Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
      • Neuroimmunology: To Sense and Protect
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Impaired Pulmonary Host Defense in Mice Lacking Expression of the CXC Chemokine Lungkine

Shu-Cheng Chen, Borna Mehrad, Jane C. Deng, Galya Vassileva, Denise J. Manfra, Donald N. Cook, Maria T. Wiekowski, Albert Zlotnik, Theodore J. Standiford and Sergio A. Lira
J Immunol March 1, 2001, 166 (5) 3362-3368; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.166.5.3362
Shu-Cheng Chen
*Department of Immunology, Schering-Plough Research Institute, Kenilworth, NJ 07033;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Borna Mehrad
†Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jane C. Deng
‡Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Galya Vassileva
*Department of Immunology, Schering-Plough Research Institute, Kenilworth, NJ 07033;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Denise J. Manfra
*Department of Immunology, Schering-Plough Research Institute, Kenilworth, NJ 07033;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Donald N. Cook
*Department of Immunology, Schering-Plough Research Institute, Kenilworth, NJ 07033;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria T. Wiekowski
*Department of Immunology, Schering-Plough Research Institute, Kenilworth, NJ 07033;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Albert Zlotnik
§DNAX Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA 94304
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Theodore J. Standiford
‡Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sergio A. Lira
*Department of Immunology, Schering-Plough Research Institute, Kenilworth, NJ 07033;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Lungkine (CXCL15) is a novel CXC chemokine that is highly expressed in the adult mouse lung. To determine the biologic function of Lungkine, we generated Lungkine null mice by targeted gene disruption. These mice did not differ from wild-type mice in their hematocrits or in the relative number of cells in leukocyte populations of peripheral blood or other tissues, including lung and bone marrow. However, Lungkine null mice were more susceptible to Klebsiella pneumonia infection, with a decreased survival and increased lung bacterial burden compared with infected wild-type mice. Histologic analysis of the lung and assessment of leukocytes in the bronchioalveolar lavage revealed that neutrophil numbers were normal in the lung parenchyma, but reduced in the airspace. The production of other neutrophil chemoattractants in the Lungkine null mice did not differ from that in wild-type mice, and neutrophil migration into other tissues was normal. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that Lungkine is an important mediator of neutrophil migration from the lung parenchyma into the airspace.

Chemokines are a large family of 8- to 10-kDa polypeptide molecules that regulate the immune system in many aspects, including chemotaxis of leukocytes, hemopoiesis, and angiogenesis (1, 2, 3, 4). Based on the composition of a cysteine motif located near the N terminus of these molecules, they are classified into four subgroups: C, CC, CXC, and CX3C. The CXC chemokines are characterized by four cysteine residues at the N terminus, the first two of which are separated by a nonconserved amino acid. They are further classified by the presence or the absence of the amino acid sequence glutamic acid-leucine-arginine (the ELR motif) immediately preceding the CXC sequence. Nearly all of the known neutrophil-targeted chemokines belong to the ELR+CXC chemokine family.

Lungkine is an ELR+CXC chemokine that is highly expressed by lung airway epithelial cells (5). It has recently been designated CXCL15, according to the new nomenclature system (6). The expression of Lungkine is up-regulated in response to a variety of inflammatory stimuli, including intratracheal challenge with LPS, Nippostronglyus, and Asperigillus (5). Because Lungkine induces neutrophil recruitment in vivo and in vitro (5) and because it is highly expressed in the lung in response to pathogens, it has been hypothesized that this chemokine may have a distinct biological role in pulmonary physiology, including host response to infection.

Recently, a novel hemopoietic regulatory factor, named WECHE, was isolated from an endothelial cell line using a differential gene expression method and was shown to be identical with Lungkine (7). During development, the expression of either the transcript or the protein of Lungkine/WECHE was found in sites of hemopoietic stem and progenitor cell production and maintenance, including day 9.5 dorsal aorta, day 10.5 yolk sac, aorta-gonad-mesonephrons, and fetal liver. In vitro, Lungkine inhibits the development of erythroid (BFU-E) progenitor cells obtained from either mouse fetal liver or bone marrow and is chemotactic for bone marrow cells in Transwell assays (7).

In an attempt to determine the biological roles of Lungkine in vivo, we have generated Lungkine null (−/−) mice. In this study, we report that Lungkine−/− mice have defects in pulmonary host defense.

Materials and Methods

Gene targeting of Lungkine

Two BAC clones containing genomic copies of the mouse Lungkine gene were identified in a mouse 129/Sv-derived embryonic stem (ES)3 cell genomic library (Incyte Genomics, St. Louis, MO) using PCR primers corresponding to the mouse Lungkine cDNA: GV15 (5′-TTAGGCATCACTGCCTGTCA-3′) and GV16 (5′-AATGAAGCTTCTGTATAGT3′). Several fragments containing the Lungkine gene were identified by Southern blot analysis of BAC plasmid DNA using a 500-bp cDNA probe labeled with [γ-32P]dCTP (3000 Ci/mmol; Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL) by random priming (Megaprime DNA Labeling System; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ). Two BamHI fragments (7.6 kb each) that contained either the 5′ half or the 3′ half of the Lungkine cDNA were subcloned into pBluescript (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) and mapped by restriction digest. The complete intron and exon sequences of these two subclones were further analyzed using an Applied Biosystems 377 DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). DNA fragments corresponding to the 5′ and 3′ regions of the Lungkine locus were, in turn, subcloned from this plasmid into the pOSDupDel vector (a gift from Oliver Smithies, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC) at either end of the neomycin resistance gene (neo). This targeting vector DNA was linearized using the restriction enzyme NotI before its introduction into 129/Sv-derived ES cells by electroporation. Lungkine-targeted ES clones were identified by Southern blotting. DNA was digested with BamHI, transferred to nylon membranes, and hybridized to a radiolabeled DNA probe derived from a region upstream of the 5′ region of homology. Cells whose DNAs were of the structure predicted for the targeted locus were used to generate chimeric mice using standard blastocyst injection procedures. Several correctly targeted ES cells were injected into blastocysts to generate chimeric mice. Lungkine heterozygous (+/−) offspring were identified using a PCR-based screening strategy using three oligonucleotide primers corresponding to the region of homology, the neo gene, and the deleted region of the Lungkine gene. Lungkine−/− mice were generated by interbreeding these heterozygous mice.

Mice

For the experiments described here we used Lungkine−/− mice generated in the 129 × BL6 background. Age- and sex-matched (129 SvEv × C57BL/6)F2 control mice (Lungkine+/+) were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). All mice were housed in a specific pathogen-free environment. All experiments in which animals were used were conducted in accordance with the institutional guidelines of Schering-Plough and the University of Michigan.

RNA analysis

Total RNA was extracted from lung tissues of wild-type and Lungkine−/− mice using an ULTRASPEC RNA isolation reagent (Biotecx, Houston, TX). Twenty micrograms of RNA was electrophoresed in a 1% agarose gel and blotted onto a Duralone membrane (Stratagene). A Lungkine cDNA probe was 32P-labeled using the Megaprime DNA labeling random primer kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Hybridization was conducted at 68°C in QuickHyb hybridization solution (Stratagene), and the blots were washed according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The membranes were then exposed overnight to x-ray film at −70°C with an intensifying screen.

Histology and immunohistochemistry

Tissues were either fresh-frozen for cryosection or perfused, inflated (for lung only), fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, and processed for paraffin sections. Routinely, 5-μm paraffin sections were cut and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. For immunostaining, fresh-frozen sections were fixed with cold acetone and stained with anti-CD11b/Mac-1 or anti-Gr-1 Abs (PharMingen, San Diego, CA). Binding of the Ab was amplified with a Vectastain Elite ABC kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) and detected with a diaminobenzidine substrate kit from Vector Laboratories. Slides were counterstained with hematoxylin.

Preparation of lung single-cell suspension

Single-cell suspensions of the lungs were prepared as previously described (8). Briefly, freshly resected lungs were minced with scissors to a fine slurry and incubated at 37°C for 30 min in an RPMI 1640 solution (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) containing 1 mg/ml type A collagenase (Roche, Indiana-polis, IN) and 30 U/ml DNase (Sigma). The solutions were then drawn up and down 20 times in 10-ml syringes (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) to disperse the cells mechanically. The resulting cell suspensions were pelleted, resuspended, passed through Nitex mesh filters (Tetko, Kansas City, MO), and passed through a 20% Percoll gradient (Sigma) before cell counting under a hemocytometer. Cytospin slides of this suspension were then prepared and stained (Diff-Quik Stain set; Dade Behring, Newark, DE), and differential cell counts were determined using a high-power microscope. The absolute number of a leukocyte subtype was determined by multiplication of the percentage of that cell type by the total number of lung leukocytes in that sample.

Flow cytometry

Total lung leukocytes were isolated from animals as described above. For identification of lung leukocyte subsets, FITC- or PE-conjugated CD4, CD8a, CD3, CD11c, B220, pan NK, Mac-1, F4/80, and Gr-1 were used (all reagents from PharMingen). In addition, cells were stained with anti-CD45 (PharMingen), allowing discrimination of leukocytes from nonleukocytes and thus eliminating any nonspecific binding of cell surface markers on nonleukocytes. Stained samples were kept in the dark at 4°C until analyzed on a FACScan cytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA) using CellQuest software (Becton Dickinson). Leukocyte populations were analyzed by gating on CD45-positive cells of the appropriate light scatter characteristics and then were examined for FL1 and FL2 fluorescence expression. The absolute number of a leukocyte type was determined by multiplication of the percentage of that cell type by the total number of lung leukocytes in that sample. For analyses of bone marrow and blood, single-cell suspensions were prepared from individual tissues by passage through a 100-μm pore size nylon cell strainer (BD Biosciences Labware, Bedford, MA) in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% FCS.

Hematology

Blood samples were collected from the infraorbital sinus into sterile evacuated tubes with added EDTA (Vacutainer Systems; Becton Dickinson, Rutherford, NJ). Hematologic values were determined with an automated system (Cell-Dyn 3500; Abbott, Chicago, IL). Platelet counts were performed manually when the instrument was unable to provide accurate platelet counts due to excessive clumping or excessively large platelets.

Klebsiella pneumoniae inoculation

We chose to use K. pneumoniae strain 43816, serotype 2 (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA) in our studies because a murine model of pneumonia has been well characterized using this strain (9, 10). K. pneumoniae was grown in tryptic soy broth (Difco, Detroit, MI) for 18 h at 37°C. The concentration of bacteria in broth was determined by measuring the amount of absorbance at 600 nm. A standard of absorbencies based on known CFU was used to calculate the inoculum concentration. An inoculum of 1 × 102 organisms was chosen, as this dose allowed for the development of substantial inflammation by 36–48 h without excessive mortality in wild-type animals. Mice were anesthetized with ∼1.8–2 mg of pentobarbital/animal i.p. The trachea was exposed, and 30 μl of inoculum or saline was administered via a sterile 26-gauge needle. The skin incision was closed with surgical staples.

Determination of lung K. pneumoniae CFU

At the time of sacrifice, the right ventricle was perfused with 1 ml of PBS, the lungs were removed aseptically and placed in 3 ml of sterile saline, and the tissues were homogenized with a tissue homogenizer under a vented hood. The lung homogenates were placed on ice, and serial 1/5 dilutions were made. Ten microliters of each dilution was plated on soy-base blood agar plates (Difco) and incubated for 18 h at 37°C, and then the colonies were counted.

Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL)

BAL was performed to obtain airspace cells as previously described (11). The trachea was exposed and intubated using a 0.97-mm outside diameter polyethylene catheter. BAL was performed by instilling PBS containing 5 mM EDTA in 1-ml aliquots. Approximately 5 ml of lavage fluid was retrieved per mouse. Cytospins were then prepared from BAL cells and stained with Diff-Quik (Dade Behring, Newark, DE), and differential counts were determined.

Lung harvesting for cytokine analysis

At designated time points, mice were sacrificed by carbon dioxide inhalation, and blood was collected by direct cardiac puncture. The pulmonary vasculature was perfused with 1 ml of PBS containing 5 mM EDTA via the right ventricle, and whole lungs were harvested for assessment of the various cytokine protein levels. Lungs were homogenized in 1.5 ml of complete protease inhibitor lysis buffer (Roche). Homogenates were incubated on ice for 30 min, then centrifuged at 2500 rpm for 10 min. Supernatants were collected, passed through a 0.45-μm pore size filter (Gelman Sciences, Ann Arbor, MI), then stored at −20°C for assessment of cytokine levels.

Murine cytokine ELISA

Murine TNF-α, macrophage-inflammatory protein-2 (MIP-2), and KC were measured using a modification of a double-ligand method as described previously (12). Briefly, flat-bottom 96-well microtiter plates (Immuno-Plate I 96-F; Nunc, Copenhagen, Denmark) were coated with 50 μl/well rabbit Ab against the various cytokines (1 μg/ml in 0.6 M NaCl, 0.26 M H3BO4, and 0.08 M NaOH, pH 9.6) for 16 h at 4°C and then washed with PBS (pH 7.5) and 0.05% Tween 20 (wash buffer). Nonspecific binding sites on the microtiter plates were blocked with 2% BSA in PBS and incubated for 90 min at 37°C. After rinsing four times with wash buffer, the plates were added with diluted (undiluted and 1/10) cell-free supernatants (50 μl) in duplicate, followed by incubation for 1 h at 37°C. Plates were washed four times, followed by the addition of 50 μl/well biotinylated rabbit Abs against the specific cytokines (3.5 μg/ml in PBS (pH 7.5), 0.05% Tween 20, and 2% FCS), and incubated for 30 min at 37°C. Streptavidin-peroxidase conjugate (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA) was then added after washing the plates, and incubation proceeded for 30 min at 37°C. Plates were washed again four times, and chromogen substrate (Bio-Rad) was added. The plates were incubated at room temperature to the desired extinction, and the reaction was terminated with 50 μl/well 3 M H2SO4 solution. Plates were read at 490 nm in an ELISA plate reader. Standards were half-log dilutions of recombinant murine cytokines from 1 pg/ml to 100 ng/ml. This ELISA method consistently detected murine cytokine concentrations >25 pg/ml. The ELISA did not cross-react with IL-1, IL-2, IL-4, or IL-6. In addition, the ELISA did not cross-react with other members of the murine chemokine family, including murine MIP-1, JE, RANTES, or ENA-78.

In vivo neutrophil chemotaxis

The mouse air-pouch model for in vivo chemotaxis has been described in detail previously (13). Briefly, sex- and age-matched Lungkine−/− and wild-type mice were anesthetized with ether. On experimental day 0, 5 ml of sterile air was injected s.c. under the dorsal skin; the resultant space was reinjected with 3 ml of sterile air on day 3. On day 5, 0.2 μg of Escherichia coli LPS (Sigma) in 1 ml of carboxymethylcellulose (0.5% in saline; Fluka, Buchs, Switzerland) was injected into the pouches. The animals were sacrificed 4 h later, and the air-pouchs were lavaged with 2 ml of sterile PBS. The resulting cell suspensions were pelleted, resuspended, and counted under a hemocytometer. Cytospin slides were prepared and stained (Diff-Quik Stain set; Dade Behring), and differential cell counts were determined using a high-power microscope. The absolute number of a leukocyte type was determined by multiplication of the percentage of that cell type by the total number of lung leukocytes in that sample.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using the InStat version 2.01 statistical package (GraphPad software; GraphPad, San Diego, CA). Survival data were compared using Fisher’s exact test. All other data were expressed as the mean ± SEM and compared using an unpaired two-tailed Mann-Whitney U (nonparametric) test. A p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Generation of Lungkine−/− mice

DNA sequence analysis of the Lungkine genomic locus revealed that it contains three introns and four exons. The translation start site is located in exon 1, and the open reading frame spans all four exons (Fig. 1⇓A). A targeting strategy was designed to delete a 3-kb sequence of Lungkine genomic DNA that includes the entire first and second exons and part of the third exon (Fig. 1⇓A). The targeting vector shown in Fig. 1⇓ was used to transfect ES cells. Two independent ES cell clones containing the targeted loci were identified by Southern blot analysis and injected into mouse blastocysts. Chimeras obtained from both clones were bred with C57BL/6J mice to generate heterozygotes (Lungkine+/−). PCR analysis of tail DNA from these founders confirmed germline transmission of the targeted allele (Fig. 1⇓B). Further intercrossing of these Lungkine+/− mice yielded Lungkine−/− mice within the expected Mendelian ratios, demonstrating that Lungkine expression is not essential for embryonic development.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Generation of Lungkine−/− mice. A, Targeting strategy. The DNA structures of the targeting vector, the Lungkine locus, and the targeted locus are shown. Arrows indicate the transcriptional direction of each gene. Open rectangles, exons. A DNA probe (filled rectangle) from a 5′ upstream homologous region of Lungkine gene was used to screen the ES cells. A 7.6- and a 5-kb BamHI fragment were expected for the wild-type Lungkine locus and for the targeted locus, respectively. Restriction enzymes shown are: H, HindIII; H/P, HindIII/PlmI; B, BamHI; and E, EcoRI. B, An analysis of mouse genomic DNA by PCR. An example of PCR products of wild-type (+/+), Lungkine heterozygous (+/−), and Lungkine null (−/−) mice is shown. C, Northern blot analysis of Lungkine−/− mice. Total RNA was isolated from lungs of two separate Lungkine−/− lines (L #25 and L #69) and from wild-type mice. A total of 20 μg of total RNA was loaded on each lane. Lungkine cDNA was used as a probe for the hybridization. No Lungkine mRNA was detected in lungs from either line of Lungkine−/− mice.

Northern blot analysis was used next to examine Lungkine mRNA expression in the lung tissues of Lungkine−/− mice. As shown in Fig. 1⇑C, a Lungkine mRNA of the predicted size was detected in the wild-type mouse, but not in either line of Lungkine−/− mice.

Lungkine−/− mice develop normally and have a normal complement of leukocytes in the lung

The Lungkine−/− mice developed normally and were fertile. Routine histologic analysis of all organs was unremarkable. Given Lungkine’s expression pattern and its chemotactic properties, we focused our initial analysis on the lung using immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry. Anti-Mac-1 and anti-Gr-1 Abs were used in immunohistochemical staining to examine the resident macrophage and neutrophil populations in the lung tissues of Lungkine−/− animals. No significant differences from wild-type mice were seen in the number or localization of these cell types in the lungs of Lungkine−/− mice (data not shown). The resident leukocyte population in lung tissue was further analyzed by flow cytometry. We did not detect significant differences in the absolute or relative numbers of distinct leukocytes (CD3-, CD4-, CD8a-, CD11c-, B220-, pan NK-, Mac-1-, F4/80-, and Gr-1-expressing subsets) between Lungkine−/− and wild-type animals (n = 10; data not shown).

Lungkine−/− mice have normal leukocyte subpopulations

To evaluate a possible role for Lungkine in hemopoiesis, leukocyte subpopulations in peripheral blood and bone marrow were analyzed by flow cytometry. Compared with wild-type mice, Lungkine−/− mice had no significant changes in the absolute or relative numbers of distinct cell types (CD11c-, B220-, pan NK-, Mac-1-, F4/80-, Gr-1-, CD4-, CD8a-, and CD3-expressing subsets; n = 14 for bone marrow and n = 10 for blood; data not shown). Similarly, hematocrits and total white blood cell counts of Lungkine−/− mice did not differ significantly from those of wild-type mice (n = 15; data not shown).

Lungkine−/− mice are more susceptible to pneumonia induced by Klebsiella

Given the known chemotactic properties of this molecule for neutrophils and its high levels of expression in the lung (5), we next examined the susceptibility of Lungkine−/− mice to Klebsiella pneumonia. Both Lungkine−/− and wild-type animals developed lethargy and ruffled fur 48 h postinoculation (p.i.) with a sublethal dose. However, only 56% of Lungkine−/− mice survived for longer than 10 days compared with an 85% survival rate for wild-type mice (Fig. 2⇓).

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Survival following K. pneumoniae (1 × 102 CFU) infection. Data represent the average values of two separate experiments. There were 13 or 14 mice in each group. Values of p were <0.05 compared with wild-type mice.

To investigate the cause of the observed increased mortality in Lungkine−/− mice, we measured the lung bacterial burden of Lungkine−/− and wild-type control mice. Lungs of animals challenged with 1 × 102 CFU K. pneumoniae were harvested 48 h p.i. As shown in Fig. 3⇓, there was a 73-fold increase in lung bacterial burden in Lungkine−/− mice compared with wild-type controls. This observation indicated that the absence of Lungkine resulted in significant impairment of the clearance of K. pneumoniae from the lung.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Quantification of lung K. pneumoniae CFU. Mice were challenged i.t. with K. pneumoniae (1 × 102 CFU), and their lungs were harvested 48 h later to determine K. pneumoniae CFU(log10). Data represent the average values of two separate experiments. There were 12 mice/group. ∗, p = 0.025 compared with wild-type mice challenged with K. pneumoniae.

Characterization of inflammatory cell influx in lungs of K. pneumoniae-infected mice

To determine whether the increased bacterial CFU in Lungkine−/− mice was associated with impaired cellular infiltration into the lung, we first examined the lungs of infected mice by histologic analysis at 24 and 48 h following Klebsiella inoculation. These time points were chosen to examine both early and maximum influxes of leukocytes, respectively (9). As shown in Fig. 4⇓, a dense neutrophilic infiltrate was observed in both the interstitial and alveolar compartments of wild-type lung. In contrast, neutrophils were strikingly absent from the alveoli of Lungkine−/− lung sections at 24 h p.i. In addition, compared with wild-type mice, an increase in basophilically stained bacterial particles was seen in lungs of Lungkine−/− mice at 48 h p.i. (Fig. 4⇓, C and D). To further characterize the apparent absence of airspace neutrophils in Lungkine−/− lung at 24 h p.i., we quantified the cell numbers in the BAL. In uninfected mice no differences in the relative or absolute numbers of total BAL cells, neutrophils, or mononuclear cells were noted between wild-type and Lungkine−/− mice. However, at 24 h p.i., an average 10-fold increase in the numbers of BAL neutrophils was observed in wild-type mice compared with baseline, whereas there was no appreciable increase in the numbers of airspace neutrophils in Lungkine−/− mice (Fig. 5⇓A). In contrast, at 48 h the numbers of BAL neutrophils in Lungkine−/− mice was even greater than that in wild-type animals, although this difference was not significant (p = 0.14). No significant differences in numbers of BAL mononuclear cells were observed at either 24 or 48 h following Klebsiella challenge (Fig. 5⇓B).

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

Lung histopathology following K. pneumoniae inoculation. Hematoxylin- and eosin-stained sections of lung harvested 24 h (A and B) and 48 h (C and D) after K. pneumoniae inoculation. A and C, Wild-type mice; B and D, Lungkine−/− mice. In Lungkine−/− mice, bacteria particles are visible under higher magnification at 48 h p.i. (arrows in inset of D; magnification, ×300). One of two representative experiments is shown.

FIGURE 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5.

Cell numbers in BAL of wild-type and Lungkine−/− mice 24 and 48 h following K. pneumoniae inoculation. Panels depict BAL neutrophil and mononuclear cell numbers at baseline and 24 and 48 h after i.t. K. pneumoniae administration, respectively. Data represent the average values of four separate experiments for neutrophils and two separate experiments for mononuclear cells. There were 4 mice/group for uninfected animals and 10–22/group for Klebsiella-challenged animals. ∗, p = 0.0012 compared with wild-type mice challenged with K. pneumoniae.

Lungkine is produced primarily by airway epithelial cells and is secreted into the airway (5). To determine whether Lungkine preferentially affects infiltration of neutrophils into the airway or into the parenchyma, we infected mice with K. pneumonia and prepared cells from both the lung airspace (BAL) and the parenchyma 24 h after bacterial challenge. As shown above, a reduction in the numbers of infiltrating neutrophils was observed in the airspace compartment of Lungkine−/− mice compared with that in wild-type mice. In contrast, higher numbers of neutrophils were observed in the parenchyma of Lungkine−/− mice compared with that of wild-type mice, although no statistically significant difference was seen between the two groups (Fig. 6⇓). This result suggests that a major function of Lungkine is to facilitate migration of neutrophils from the parenchyma into the airway.

FIGURE 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 6.

Parenchymal neutrophil cell numbers in the lungs of wild-type and Lungkine−/− mice 24 h after K. pneumoniae inoculation. Data represent the average values of two separate experiments. There were 12 mice/group. p = 0.29 compared with wild-type mice challenged with K. pneumoniae.

Analysis of lung neutrophil-chemotactic mediators and extrapulmonary neutrophil chemotaxis in Lungkine−/− mice

We next addressed whether a reduction in airway neutrophils of Lungkine-deficient mice is secondary to impaired production of other neutrophil chemotactic mediators. Levels of TNF-α, MIP-2, and KC in the lung were measured 24 h p.i. with K. pneumoniae. No significant differences in the levels of these cytokines were seen between lungs of wild-type and Lungkine-deficient animals (data not shown), indicating that the reduced neutrophil influx into the airway of Lungkine−/− mice is independent of other neutrophil chemoattractants.

To assess whether the Lungkine deficiency results in a general defect in neutrophil mobilization, we measured neutrophil chemotaxis at an extrapulmonary site. We used a well-characterized model in which LPS is injected into an s.c. air-pouch, (13, 14). As shown in Fig. 7⇓, at 4 h postinjection, an early time point at which the accumulation of neutrophils can be reliably assessed (14), there was no significant difference in the number of neutrophils between wild-type and Lungkine−/− animals (1.03 × 107 ± 2.9 × 106 and 8.6 × 106 ± 2.7 × 106 neutrophils, respectively). This indicates that Lungkine is not generally required for neutrophil trafficking and suggests that it is specific to the airspace of the lung.

FIGURE 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 7.

Number of neutrophils in the s.c. air-pouch in wild-type and Lungkine−/− mice after LPS instillation. LPS was injected into the air-pouches in wild-type and Lungkine−/− mice, and the infiltrating cells were lavaged at 4 h after injection as described in Materials and Methods. There were six mice per group. p = 0.65 compared with wild-type mice challenged with LPS.

Discussion

In this report, we describe the generation and preliminary characterization of mice lacking the novel CXC chemokine Lungkine. In the adult mouse, Lungkine is produced at appreciable levels only by lung epithelial cells and collects in the lung airspace, suggesting that it might function in pulmonary host defense. We now show that deletion of the Lungkine gene is associated with diminished host defense against the pulmonary pathogen K. pneumoniae.

The rapid clearance of bacterial pathogens from the respiratory tract is mediated by resident alveolar macrophages and neutrophils that are recruited from the blood into the airspace (15, 16, 17). This neutrophil recruitment is mediated by the production in the lung of chemotactic cytokines (16). ELR+ CXC chemokines, including MIP-2 and KC, contribute to antibacterial host defense by affecting neutrophil trafficking and activation (9, 11, 18).

The increased mortality in Lungkine−/− mice following infection with K. pneumonia demonstrates that Lungkine is a chemokine that has a central role in pulmonary host defense. Our finding that the numbers of neutrophils are decreased in the BAL of infected Lungkine−/− mice at 24 h p.i. (but not in the parenchyma) suggests that one function of Lungkine might be to direct neutrophils from the parenchyma into the airspace. This reduction may be of notable functional importance, given the key role of neutrophils in innate defense against bacteria in the respiratory tract that have not been killed by resident alveolar macrophages (15). In fact, at 48 h p.i., the burden of bacteria was considerably greater in Lungkine−/− mice than in wild-type control animals. The increased bacterial load may lead to tissue invasion and dissemination that is not adequately controlled despite the impressive influx of neutrophils seen in Lungkine−/− mice at this time. A similar increase in both neutrophils and bacteria was seen in mice lacking the receptor for neutrophil chemoattractant C5a following infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, although the C5a-deficient mice did not display the early deficit in airway neutrophils seen in the Lungkine−/− mice (19). This increased neutrophilic content found in the airways of both these mouse strains is probably secondary to an increased bacterial load. However, as in all genetically engineered, loss-of-function mice, we cannot exclude the possibility that other unidentified, compensatory neutrophil attractants are up-regulated in Lungkine−/− mice. Lungkine protein has been shown by others to be secreted into the alveolar space in response to inflammatory stimuli (5). This pattern of expression and secretion may favor directed migration of leukocytes from the vascular and/or interstitial spaces into the airway lumen and alveolar spaces. If that is the case, it is unclear why so few neutrophils are normally present within the lung airspace and airway despite the fact that Lungkine is expressed at high levels in these structures. Apparent paradoxes of this sort are not unique to Lungkine. Other chemokines, such as eotaxin (20, 21), have potent chemoattractant roles in vitro and are expressed at high levels in tissues that are not normally infiltrated by eosinophils, the target cells of eotaxin. We propose that Lungkine may act as a permissive factor, facilitating the transmigration of neutrophils into the airways during the early phases of inflammation. For example, Lungkine may act specifically on activated neutrophils or may work in concert with undefined molecules that are present only on the surface of inflamed endothelium. It is also possible that Lungkine, like other ELR+ CXC chemokines, may affect polymorphonuclear leukocyte activities, including respiratory burst and antimicrobial activities (1, 2, 22). Finally, the site of production (distal airway epithelial cells) and the magnitude of expression show similarities to the expression of defensin proteins (23), and this raises the possibility that Lungkine may have direct antimicrobial properties that are independent of its effects on neutrophils. Exploring these mechanistic possibilities will probably contribute to a better understanding of the role of Lungkine in host defenses and to insights into the biology of a subset of chemokines expressed constitutively in specific organs.

Acknowledgments

We thank Channa Young, Petronio Zalamea, Linda Hamilton, Susan Abbondanzo, and Peggy Monahan for excellent technical assistance. We thank Dr. Lee Sullivan for informative discussion and support throughout the course of this work. We also thank the scientists at Schering-Plough Clinical Pathology Laboratory for their excellent technical assistance in hematology.

Footnotes

  • ↵1 This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants RO1HL56402 (to T.J.S.), RO1HL57243 (to T.J.S.), P50HL60289 (to T.J.S.), and K08HL04220 (to B.M.) and American Lung Association Grant RG-005-N (to B.M.).

  • ↵2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Sergio A. Lira, Department of Immunology, Schering-Plough Research Institute, 2015 Galloping Hill Road, Kenilworth, NJ 07033. E-mail address: sergio.lira{at}spcorp.com

  • 3 Abbreviations used in this paper: ES, embryonic stem; p.i., postinoculation; BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; MIP-2, macrophage-inflammatory protein-2.

  • Received October 12, 2000.
  • Accepted December 14, 2000.
  • Copyright © 2001 by The American Association of Immunologists

References

  1. ↵
    Luster, A. D.. 1998. Chemokines: chemotactic cytokines that mediate inflammation. N. Engl. J. Med. 338: 436
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Rollins, B. J.. 1997. Chemokines. Blood 90: 909
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Broxmeyer, H. E., C. H. Kim. 1999. Chemokines and hematopoiesis. B. J. Rollins, ed. Chemokines and Cancer 263 Humana Press, Totowa.
  4. ↵
    Broxmeyer, H. E., C. H. Kim. 1999. Regulation of hematopoiesis in a sea of chemokine family members with a plethora of redundant activities. Exp. Hematol. 27: 1113
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Rossi, D. L., S. D. Hurst, Y. Xu, W. Wang, S. Menon, R. L. Coffman, A. Zlotnik. 1999. Lungkine, a novel CXC chemokine, specifically expressed by lung bronchoepithelial cells. J. Immunol. 162: 5490
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Zlotnik, A., O. Yoshie. 2000. Chemokines: a new classification system and their role in immunity. Immunity 12: 121
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Ohneda, O., K. Ohneda, H. Nomiyama, Z. Zheng, S. A. Gold, F. Arai, T. Miyamoto, B. E. Taillon, R. A. McIndoe, R. A. Shimkets, et al 2000. WECHE: a novel hematopoietic regulatory factor. Immunity 12: 141
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Huffnagle, G. B., M. F. Lipscomb, J. A. Lovchik, K. A. Hoag, N. E. Street. 1994. The role of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the protective inflammatory response to a pulmonary cryptococcal infection. J. Leukocyte Biol. 55: 35
    OpenUrlAbstract
  9. ↵
    Greenberger, M. J., R. M. Strieter, S. L. Kunkel, J. M. Danforth, L. L. Laichalk, D. C. McGillicuddy, T. J. Standiford. 1996. Neutralization of macrophage inflammatory protein-2 attenuates neutrophil recruitment and bacterial clearance in murine Klebsiella pneumonia. J. Infect. Dis. 173: 159
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Greenberger, M. J., R. M. Strieter, S. L. Kunkel, J. M. Danforth, R. E. Goodman, T. J. Standiford. 1995. Neutralization of IL-10 increases survival in a murine model of Klebsiella pneumonia. J. Immunol. 155: 722
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Tsai, W. C., R. M. Strieter, J. M. Wilkowski, K. A. Bucknell, M. D. Burdick, S. A. Lira, T. J. Standiford. 1998. Lung-specific transgenic expression of KC enhances resistance to Klebsiella pneumoniae in mice. J. Immunol. 161: 2435
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Rovai, L. E., H. R. Herschman, J. B. Smith. 1998. The murine neutrophil-chemoattractant chemokines LIX, KC, and MIP-2 have distinct induction kinetics, tissue distributions, and tissue-specific sensitivities to glucocorticoid regulation in endotoxemia. J. Leukocyte Biol. 64: 494
    OpenUrlAbstract
  13. ↵
    Edwards, J. C., A. D. Sedgwick, D. A. Willoughby. 1981. The formation of a structure with the features of synovial lining by subcutaneous injection of air: an in vivo tissue culture system. J. Pathol. 134: 147
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Perretti, M., J. G. Harris, R. J. Flower. 1994. A role for endogenous histamine in interleukin-8-induced neutrophil infiltration into mouse air-pouch: investigation of the modulatory action of systemic and local dexamethasone. Br. J. Pharmacol. 112: 801
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Toews, G. B., G. N. Gross, A. K. Pierce. 1979. The relationship of inoculum size to lung bacterial clearance and phagocytic cell response in mice. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 120: 559
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    Standiford, T. J.. 1997. Cytokines and pulmonary host defenses. Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med. 3: 81
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Broug-Holub, E., G. B. Toews, J. F. van Iwaarden, R. M. Strieter, S. L. Kunkel, R. Paine, III, T. J. Standiford. 1997. Alveolar macrophages are required for protective pulmonary defenses in murine Klebsiella pneumonia: elimination of alveolar macrophages increases neutrophil recruitment but decreases bacterial clearance and survival. Infect. Immun. 65: 1139
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Huang, S., J. D. Paulauskis, J. J. Godleski, L. Kobzik. 1992. Expression of macrophage inflammatory protein-2 and KC mRNA in pulmonary inflammation. Am. J. Pathol. 141: 981
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    Hopken, U. E., B. Lu, N. P. Gerard, C. Gerard. 1996. The C5a chemoattractant receptor mediates mucosal defence to infection. Nature 383: 86
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Rothenberg, M. E., A. D. Luster, P. Leder. 1995. Murine eotaxin: an eosinophil chemoattractant inducible in endothelial cells and in interleukin 4-induced tumor suppression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 8960
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Ganzalo, J. A., G. Q. Jia, V. Aguirre, D. Friend, A. J. Coyle, N. A. Jenkins, G. S. Lin, H. Katz, A. Lichtman, N. Copeland, et al 1996. Mouse eotaxin expression parallels eosinophil accumulation during lung allergic inflammation but it is not restricted to a Th2-type response. Immunity 4: 1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Frevert, C. W., S. Huang, H. Danaee, J. D. Paulauskis, L. Kobzik. 1995. Functional characterization of the rat chemokine KC and its importance in neutrophil recruitment in a rat model of pulmonary inflammation. J. Immunol. 154: 335
    OpenUrlAbstract
  23. ↵
    Ganz, T.. 1999. Defensins and host defense. Science 286: 420
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 166 (5)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 166, Issue 5
1 Mar 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Impaired Pulmonary Host Defense in Mice Lacking Expression of the CXC Chemokine Lungkine
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Impaired Pulmonary Host Defense in Mice Lacking Expression of the CXC Chemokine Lungkine
Shu-Cheng Chen, Borna Mehrad, Jane C. Deng, Galya Vassileva, Denise J. Manfra, Donald N. Cook, Maria T. Wiekowski, Albert Zlotnik, Theodore J. Standiford, Sergio A. Lira
The Journal of Immunology March 1, 2001, 166 (5) 3362-3368; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.5.3362

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Impaired Pulmonary Host Defense in Mice Lacking Expression of the CXC Chemokine Lungkine
Shu-Cheng Chen, Borna Mehrad, Jane C. Deng, Galya Vassileva, Denise J. Manfra, Donald N. Cook, Maria T. Wiekowski, Albert Zlotnik, Theodore J. Standiford, Sergio A. Lira
The Journal of Immunology March 1, 2001, 166 (5) 3362-3368; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.5.3362
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Early Self-Regulatory Mechanisms Control the Magnitude of CD8+ T Cell Responses Against Liver Stages of Murine Malaria
  • Sublethal Hyperoxia Impairs Pulmonary Innate Immunity
  • Dependence of IL-4, IL-13, and Nematode-Induced Alterations in Murine Small Intestinal Smooth Muscle Contractility on Stat6 and Enteric Nerves
Show more HOST DEFENSE

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Public Access
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606