Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
      • Neuroimmunology: To Sense and Protect
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Cutting Edge: The Neurotoxic Prion Peptide Fragment PrP106–126 Is a Chemotactic Agonist for the G Protein-Coupled Receptor Formyl Peptide Receptor-Like 1

Yingying Le, Hiroshi Yazawa, Wanghua Gong, Zuxi Yu, Victor J. Ferrans, Philip M. Murphy and Ji Ming Wang
J Immunol February 1, 2001, 166 (3) 1448-1451; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.166.3.1448
Yingying Le
*Laboratory of Molecular Immunoregulation, Division of Basic Sciences, National Cancer Institute-Frederick and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hiroshi Yazawa
*Laboratory of Molecular Immunoregulation, Division of Basic Sciences, National Cancer Institute-Frederick and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wanghua Gong
†Intramural Research Support Program, Science Applications International Corporation-Frederick, Frederick, MD 21702;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zuxi Yu
‡Pathology Section, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Victor J. Ferrans
‡Pathology Section, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philip M. Murphy
§Laboratory of Host Defenses, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ji Ming Wang
*Laboratory of Molecular Immunoregulation, Division of Basic Sciences, National Cancer Institute-Frederick and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Prion diseases are transmissible and fatal neurodegenerative disorders which involve infiltration and activation of mononuclear phagocytes at the brain lesions. A 20-aa acid fragment of the human cellular prion protein, PrP106–126, was reported to mimic the biological activity of the pathologic isoform of prion and activates mononuclear phagocytes. The cell surface receptor(s) mediating the activity of PrP106–126 is unknown. In this study, we show that PrP106–126 is chemotactic for human monocytes through the use of a G protein-coupled receptor formyl peptide receptor-like 1 (FPRL1), which has been reported to interact with a diverse array of exogenous or endogenous ligands. Upon stimulation by PrP106–126, FPRL1 underwent a rapid internalization and, furthermore, PrP106–126 enhanced monocyte production of proinflammatory cytokines, which was inhibited by pertussis toxin. Thus, FPRL1 may act as a “pattern recognition” receptor that interacts with multiple pathologic agents and may be involved in the proinflammatory process of prion diseases.

Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in humans, scrapie in sheep, and spongiform encephalopathy in cattle (BSE, or “mad cow disease”) are transmissible and fatal neurodegenerative diseases (1). The etiological agent of these diseases is proposed to be an aberrant isoform of the cell surface glycoprotein, the prion protein (PrPc) (1). The pathologic isoform of PrPc (PrPSc) is deposited in the extracellular space of diseased CNS at sites infiltrated by activated astrocytes and mononuclear phagocytes (microglia) (2, 3). Although a direct neurotoxic effect of prion or its peptide fragment is reported to account for the neurodegeneration in prion diseases (4), other evidence implicates an indirect pathway, mediated by neurotoxins and proinflammatory cytokines released by prion-stimulated microglial cells (5, 6). A 20-aa fragment of the human prion protein, PrP106–126, has been shown to form fibrils in vitro and to elicit a diverse array of biological responses in mononuclear phagocytes, i.e., monocytes and microglia, including calcium mobilization, protein tyrosine phosphorylation, and production of cytokines (7, 8, 9, 10). However, the identity of the cellular receptor(s) that mediate the activity of PrP106–126 remains unresolved. Our data show that the PrP106–126 induces directional migration of human monocytic phagocytes and further demonstrates that PrP106–126 uses the G protein-coupled receptor formyl peptide receptor-like 1 (FPRL1)4 to activate cells. To our knowledge, this is the first receptor described to mediate the biological activity of PrP106–126.

Materials and Methods

Reagents and cells

PrP106–126 was purchased from Bachem Bioscience (King of Prussia, PA) or synthesized and purified by the Department of Biochemistry, Colorado State University (Fort Collins, CO), according to the published sequence (4). The purity was >90% and the amino acid composition was verified by mass spectrometry. The endotoxin levels in the dissolved peptide were undetectable. PrP106–126 was dissolved in DMSO at 10 mM as stock solution and was diluted in RPMI 1640 containing 1% BSA for experiments. The final concentration of DMSO in a solution of 50 μM PrP106–126 was 0.5%. This concentration of DMSO was used in control medium and we found no effect on cell responsiveness. The synthetic N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLF) was purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Human peripheral blood monocytes were isolated from buffy coats (Transfusion Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD) enriched for mononuclear cells by using an iso-osmotic Percoll gradient. The purity of the cell preparations was examined by morphology and was >90%. Rat basophilic leukemia cell line (RBL-2H3) transfected with epitope-tagged formyl peptide receptor (FPR) (designated ETFR) was a kind gift from R. Snyderman (Duke University, Durham, NC). cDNA cloning and establishment of FPRL1-transfected HEK/293 cells (FPRL1/293) have been described previously (11). All of the transfected cells were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS (HyClone, Logan, UT), 1 mM glutamine (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY), and 800 μg/ml geneticin (G418; Life Technologies).

Chemotaxis assays

Chemotaxis assays were performed using 48-well chemotaxis chambers (Neuroprobe, Cabin John, MD) as described previously (12). The chemotaxis index was used which represented the fold increase in the number of cells migrated in response to chemoattractants over the spontaneous cell migration (in response to control medium).

Calcium mobilization

Cells (2 × 107 cells/ml) were incubated with 5 μM fura-2-acetoxymethyl ester (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) in loading medium (DMEM, 10% FBS, 2 mM glutamine) for 30 min at room temperature. Ca2+ mobilization induced by stimulants was measured with a luminescence spectrometer (LS-50B; Perkin-Elmer, Beaconsfield, U.K.) as previously described (12).

FPRL1 internalization

FPRL1/293 cells cultured on chamber slides (Nalge Nunc International, Naperville, IL) were stimulated for 15 min at 37°C with peptides. Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature. After washing with PBS, cells were incubated with PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 and 5% normal goat serum for 1 h to block nonspecific binding sites and to permeabilize the cells. The slides were incubated for 1 h at room temperature with a rabbit polyclonal Ab that recognizes the C-terminal 20 aa of FPRL1 (a kind gift from C.-C. Li, Science Applications International Corporation-Frederick, National Cancer Institute-Frederick; 1:50 dilution in PBS-Tween 20-normal goat serum). The slides were then washed three times with PBS and further incubated with a FITC-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Sigma; 1:150 dilution in TBS containing 3% BSA) for 30 min. The slides finally were mounted with an anti-fade water-based mounting medium with 4′,6′-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) and analyzed with a laser scanning confocal fluorescence microscope (Leica TCS-4D DMIRBE; Leica, Heidelberg, Germany). Excitation wavelengths of 365 nm (for DAPI) and 488 nm (for FITC) were used to generate fluorescence emission in blue and green, respectively.

Measurements of cytokine production

Monocytes were first preincubated with or without 50 ng/ml pertussis toxin (PT) at 37°C for 4 h and then incubated with stimulants for another 24 h in RPMI 1640 without FCS or BSA. Supernatants were collected and secreted cytokines were measured by ELISA using QuantiGlo ELISA kits (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN).

Statistical analysis

All experiments were performed at least three times and the results presented are from representative experiments. The significance of the difference between test and control groups was analyzed with Student’s t test.

Results and Discussion

Microglia, the resting monocytes in the brain, and peripheral blood monocytes accumulate and are activated at sites of prion plaques (2, 3). We therefore investigated the capacity of PrP106–126 to induce directional migration of monocytes, a crucial step in the accumulation of cells at sites of origin of chemotactic factors. Freshly dissolved PrP106–126 induced a dose-dependent migration of human monocytes with a maximal cell response occurring at 50 μM of the peptide (Figs. 1⇓ and 2⇓A), a concentration comparable to or lower than needed to activate other functions of microglia or monocytes (5, 7, 8, 9, 10). When incubated at 37°C (500 μM PrP106–126 diluted in PBS) to promote the formation of fibrils, the aggregated peptide induced a comparable level of monocyte migration as freshly dissolved PrP106–126 (Fig. 2⇓A). The monocyte migration is dependent on the chemotactic rather than the chemokinetic activity of the PrP106–126, as evaluated with checkerboard analyses (data not shown). A peptide with a scrambled amino acid sequence of PrP106–126 was completely inactive (data not shown). Since many known leukocyte chemotactic factors use G protein-coupled receptors to induce directional cell migration, we investigated whether PrP106–126 also activated such a receptor. Monocyte migration in response to soluble PrP106–126 was completely inhibited by treatment of the cells with PT, an inhibitor of Gi and Go proteins (Fig. 2⇓B), suggesting that a G protein-coupled receptor was involved. This was supported by induction of transient mobilization of intracellular calcium (Ca2+) in monocytes by PrP106–126 (Fig. 2⇓C), which was also completely inhibited by pretreatment of the cells with PT (data not shown).

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Monocyte chemotaxis induced by PrP106–126. Left, Monocyte migration in the absence of stimuli. Open arrow indicates a micropore on the polycarbonate filter. Filled arrow denotes a monocyte migrated across the filter. Center, Monocyte migration in response to 50 μM freshly dissolved PrP106–126. Right, Monocyte migration induced by 10 nM bacterial chemotactic peptide fMLF. Original magnification, ×400.

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Activation of human monocytes by PrP106–126. A, Migration of monocytes induced by freshly prepared PrP106–126 and PrP106–126 “aged” at 37°C for 3 or 7 days. B, Effect of preincubation with medium (PT−) or PT+ (100 ng/ml, 37°C, 30 min) on monocyte migration to PrP106–126. fMLF at 100 nM was used as a control. C, Ca2+ mobilization induced by PrP106–126 in monocytes. D, Attenuation of PrP106–126-induced Ca2+ flux in monocytes by fMLF.

We then examined the capacity of a variety of other chemoattractants to cross-desensitize PrP106–126-induced Ca2+ mobilization. This method has been effectively used previously to identify the sharing of receptors by chemotactic factors. The bacterial chemotactic peptide fMLF clearly attenuated PrP106–126-induced Ca2+ flux in monocytes (Fig. 2⇑D). Since high concentrations of fMLF were required to completely desensitize the cell response to PrP106–126 (Fig. 2⇑D), and such concentrations of fMLF have been found to additionally activate a G protein-coupled receptor FPRL1, which is also termed as the low-affinity fMLF receptor based on its homology to the high-affinity fMLF receptor FPR (13), we postulated that PrP106–126 might share FPRL1 with fMLF. It was therefore determined that PrP106–126 induced significant Ca2+ mobilization in FPRL1/293 cells (Fig. 3⇓A), which was also completely inhibited by PT (data not shown). Untransfected parental cells (data not shown) or cells transfected with other chemoattractant receptors including FPR (Fig. 3⇓E) did not respond to PrP106–126. PrP106–126 signaling in FPRL1/293 cells was desensitized by prior stimulation of the cells with high concentrations of fMLF (data not shown) and bidirectionally by another ligand for FPRL1, a synthetic peptide MMK-1 (14) (Fig. 3⇓, B–D). Furthermore, FPRL1/293 cells, but not parental 293 cells or cells transfected with FPR, migrated in response to PrP106–126 (Fig. 3⇓F). The concentrations required for PrP106–126 to activate FPRL1 were similar to those for monocytes, suggesting a major role for FPRL1 in monocyte activation by this prion protein fragment.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Activation of FPRL1/293 cells by PrP106–126. A, Ca2+ mobilization induced by PrP106–126 in FPRL1/293 cells. B–D, Cross-desensitization of calcium mobilization between PrP106–126 and MMK-1 in FPRL1/293 cells. E, Ca2+ flux induced by fMLF and PrP106–126 in FPR-expressing RBL cells (ETFR). F, Migration of FPRL1/293 and ETFR cells induced by PrP106–126. fMLF at 100 nM was used as a control. G, Confocal micrographs of FPRL1/293 cells stained with anti-FPRL1 Ab (green) showing localization of FPRL1 in the cell membrane (left). FPRL1 internalization is induced by PrP106–126 (50 μM; center) and WKYMVm (W peptide, 2 μM; right) in these cells. The nuclei appear blue (DAPI counterstain). Original magnification, ×600.

The possibility that FPRL1 contributed to the intracellular accumulation of prion fibrils was examined. Confocal microscopy showed that PrP106–126 induced a rapid internalization of FPRL1 in FPRL1/293 cells (Fig. 3⇑G). As a peptide control, it was shown that another synthetic peptide WKYMVm (W peptide), a ligand for FPRL1 (12), similarly induced internalization of FPRL1. These results suggest that FPRL1 may also play a role in the uptake of prion peptide by FPRL1-bearing cells.

We further investigated the capacity of ligand activation of FPRL1 to enhance the production of proinflammatory cytokines in monocytes. PrP106–126 at concentrations that induced FPRL1-mediated cell migration stimulated a PT-sensitive production of proinflammatory cytokines in monocytes (Table I⇓). The FPRL1 ligand MMK-1 had similar effects. In contrast, cytokine production in response to bacterial LPS, which does not use G protein-coupled receptor, was resistant to PT. Thus, in addition to mediating cell migration, FPRL1 activation by PrP106–126 induced the release of proinflammatory cytokines that have been implicated in the neurotoxic effect of monocyte supernatants (10).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table I.

Induction of IL-1β and IL-6 by PrP106-126a

PrP106–126 was derived from the amino acid sequence of human prion. In vitro, this peptide fragment has a high propensity to form amyloid-like aggregates and to induce apoptotic death of neuronal cells (4, 5, 6, 10). It was subsequently established that the neurotoxic effect of PrP106–126 requires the presence of microglia or monocytes (4, 5, 6, 10), and PrP106–126 induces signaling events in these cells that typically involved activation of cell surface receptor(s) (7, 8, 9, 10). Our study identifies FPRL1 as a functional receptor used by PrP106–126 to induce monocytic cell migration and activation.

FPRL1 is a G protein-coupled receptor that is capable of interacting with a number of agonists, including peptide domains derived from HIV-1 envelope proteins (13) and at least four host-derived molecules, serum amyloid A (15), lipid metabolite lipoxin A4 (16), β amyloid peptide,5, and cathelicidin (17). FPRL1 mediates the chemotactic activity of peptide agonists and serum amyloid A, which is an acute phase protein and forms amyloid deposit during chronic inflammation (18). Consequently, FPRL1 behaves as a “pattern recognition” receptor that is activated to transduce signals by a wide variety of unrelated ligands. Stimulation of FPRL1 by its chemotactic agonists triggers a series of G protein-mediated signaling cascades leading to cell adhesion, migration, protein tyrosine phosphorylation, release of reactive oxygen intermediates, as well as gene activation and production of proinflammatory cytokines (13). These properties of FPRL1 account for various biological activities reported for PrP106–126. FPRL1 is expressed in a number of cell types including cells of the nonhematopoietic origin such as epithelia (13). We found that human astrocytoma cells express FPRL1 and can be activated by FPRL1-specific agonists (19). We also detected FPRL1 gene expression in a neuroblastoma cell line and in a murine microglial cell line N9 (Y. Le, unpublished observation). Whether normal human neurons and astroglial cells express the functional FPRL1 and its role in glial activation and neuronal destruction are under further investigation.

A relatively high concentration (50 μM) of PrP106–126 was required to induce an FPRL1-dependent maximal monocyte chemotactic response. Therefore, PrP106–126 appears to interact with FPRL1 with a relatively low affinity. However, many chemoattractants, including some chemokines, also show low-affinity interaction with their receptors and such interactions nevertheless contribute to the recruitment of leukocytes to the sites of inflammation (20). Although our results are based on in vitro models, they have repeatedly been shown to correlate directly with in vivo disease states (2, 3) in which infiltration of mononuclear phagocytes (monocytes and microglia) was found in and around prion disease lesions in association with proinflammatory reactions (2, 3). Thus, the low-affinity PrP106–126 and FPRL1 interaction may help direct monocytes/microglia migrate to the vicinity of prion lesions which contain high concentrations of these amyloidogenic precursors and aggregated fragments including PrP106–126 (4, 21, 22, 23, 24). Interestingly, a recent study revealed that PrP106–126 was detected in brain lesions of some Alzheimer’s disease patients, suggesting the coexistence of prion disease pathology in Alzheimer’s disease (25). Our observation of FPRL1 as a functional receptor, used by PrP106–126 to chemoattract and activate mononuclear phagocytes, should promote further assessment of this receptor as a mediator of proinflammatory responses in neurodegenerative diseases and as a potential therapeutic target.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. J. J. Oppenheim for critical review of this manuscript. The technical support of N. M. Dunlop and secretarial assistance of C. Fogle and C. Nolan are gratefully acknowledged.

Footnotes

  • ↵1 This project has been funded in part with federal funds from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, under Contract NO1-CO-56000.

  • ↵2 The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. government. The publisher or recipient acknowledges right of the U.S. government to retain a nonexclusive, royalty-free license in and to any copyright covering the article.

  • ↵3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Ji Ming Wang, Laboratory of Molecular Immunoregulation, Division of Basic Sciences, National Cancer Institute-Frederick, Building 560, Room 31-40, Frederick, MD 21702. E-mail address: wangji{at}mail.ncifcrf.gov

  • ↵4 Abbreviations used in this paper: FPRL1, formyl peptide receptor-like 1; fMLF, N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine; DAPI, 4′,6′-diamidino-2-phenylindole; PT, pertussis toxin; FPR, formyl peptide receptor.

  • 5 Y. Le, et al. Amyloid β42 activates a G-protein-coupled chemoattractant receptor FPR-like 1. Submitted for publication.

  • Received October 18, 2000.
  • Accepted November 30, 2000.
  • Copyright © 2001 by The American Association of Immunologists

References

  1. ↵
    Prusiner, S. B.. 1998. Prions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 13363
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Perry, V. H., S. J. Bolton, D. C. Anthony, S. Betmouni. 1998. The contribution of inflammation to acute and chronic neurodegeneration. Res. Immunol. 149: 721
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Brown, D. R., H. A. Kretzschmar. 1997. Microglia and prion disease: a review. Histol. Histopathol. 12: 883
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    Forloni, G., N. Angeretti, R. Chiesa, E. Monzani, M. Salmona, O. Bugiani, F. Tagliavini. 1993. Neurotoxicity of a prion protein fragment. Nature 362: 543
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Brown, D. R., B. Schmidt, H. A. Kretzschmar. 1996. Role of microglia and host prion protein in neurotoxicity of a prion protein fragment. Nature 380: 345
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Giese, A., D. R. Brown, M. H. Groschup, C. Feldmann, I. Haist, H. A. Kretzschmar. 1998. Role of microglia in neuronal cell death in prion disease. Brain Pathol. 8: 449
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    Peyrin, J. M., C. I. Lasmezas, S. Haik, F. Tagliavini, M. Salmona, A. Williams, D. Richie, J. P. Deslys, D. Dormont. 1999. Microglial cells respond to amyloidogenic PrP peptide by the production of inflammatory cytokines. NeuroReport 10: 723
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Silei, V., C. Fabrizi, G. Venturini, M. Salmona, O. Bugiani, F. Tagliavini, G. M. Lauro. 1999. Activation of microglial cells by PrP and β-amyloid fragments raises intracellular calcium through L-type voltage sensitive calcium channels. Brain Res. 818: 168
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Herms, J. W., A. Madlung, D. R. Brown, H. A. Kretzschmar. 1997. Increase of intracellular free Ca2+ in microglia activated by prion protein fragment. Glia 21: 253
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Combs, C. K., D. E. Johnson, S. B. Cannady, T. M. Lehman, G. E. Landreth. 1999. Identification of microglial signal transduction pathways mediating a neurotoxic response to amyloidogenic fragments of β-amyloid and prion proteins. J. Neurosci. 19: 928
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Gao, J. L., P. M. Murphy. 1993. Species and subtype variants of the N-formyl peptide chemotactic receptor reveal multiple important functional domains. J. Biol. Chem. 268: 25395
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Le, Y., W. Gong, B. Li, N. M. Dunlop, W. Shen, S. B. Su, R. D. Ye, J. M. Wang. 1999. Utilization of two seven-transmembrane, G protein-coupled receptors, formyl peptide receptor-like 1 and formyl peptide receptor, by the synthetic hexapeptide WKYMVm for human phagocyte activation. J. Immunol. 163: 6777
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Le, Y., B. Li, W. Gong, W. Shen, J. Hu, N. M. Dunlop, J. J. Oppenjheim, and J. M. Wang. 2000. Novel pathophysiological role of classical chemotactic peptide receptors and their communications with chemokine receptors. Immunol. Rev. In press.
  14. ↵
    Klein, C., J. I. Paul, K. Sauve, M. M. Schmidt, L. Arcangeli, J. Ransom, J. Trueheart, J. P. Manfredi, J. R. Broach, A. J. Murphy. 1998. Identification of surrogate agonists for the human FPRL-1 receptor by autocrine selection in yeast. Nat. Biotechnol. 16: 1334
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Su, S. B., W. Gong, J. L. Gao, W. Shen, P. M. Murphy, J. J. Oppenheim, J. M. Wang. 1999. A seven-transmembrane, G protein-coupled receptor, FPRL1, mediates the chemotactic activity of serum amyloid A for human phagocytic cells. J. Exp. Med. 189: 395
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Serhan, C. N., T. Takano, J. F. Maddox. 1999. Aspirin-triggered 15-epi-lipoxin A4 and stable analogs on lipoxin A4 are potent inhibitors of acute inflammation: receptors and pathways. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 447: 133
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Yang, D., Q. Chen, A. P. Schmidt, G. M. Anderson, J. M. Wang, J. Wooters, J. J. Oppenheim, O. Chertov. 2000. LL-37, the neutrophil granule- and epithelial cell-derived cathelicidin, utilizes formyl peptide receptor-like 1 (FPRL1) as a receptor to chemoattract human peripheral blood neutrophils, monocytes, and T cells. J. Exp. Med. 192: 1069
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Sipe, J. D.. 1990. The acute-phase response. J.J. Oppenheim, and E.M. Shevach, eds. Immunophysiology: The Role of Cells and Cytokines in Immunity and Inflammation 259 Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
  19. ↵
    Le, Y., J. Hu, W. Gong, W. Shen, B. Li, N. M. Dunlop, D. O. Halverson, D. G. Blair, J. M. Wang. 2000. Expression of functional formyl peptide receptors by human astrocytoma cell lines. J. Neuroimmunol. 111: 102
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Foxman, E. F., J. J. Campbell, E. C. Butcher. 1997. Multistep navigation and the combinatorial control of leukocyte chemotaxis. J. Cell Biol. 139: 1349
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Meyer, R. K., M. P. McKinley, K. A. Bowman, M. B. Braunfeld, R. A. Barry, S. B. Prusiner. 1986. Separation and properties of cellular and scrapie prion proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83: 2310
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Bruce, M. E., P. A. McBride, C. F. Farquhar. 1989. Precise targeting of the pathology of the sialoglycoprotein, PrP, and vacuolar degeneration in mouse scrapie. Neurosci. Lett. 102: 1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    DeArmond, S. J., W. C. Mobley, D. L. DeMott, R. A. Barry, J. H. Beckstead, S. B. Prusiner. 1987. Changes in the localization of brain prion proteins during scrapie infection. Neurology 37: 1271
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Giaccone, G., L. Verga, O. Bugiani, B. Frangione, D. Serban, S. B. Prusiner, M. R. Farlow, B. Ghetti, F. Tagliavini. 1992. Prion protein preamyloid and amyloid deposits in Gerstmann-Straussler-Scheinker disease, Indiana kindred. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89: 9349
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Leuba, G., K. Saini, A. Savioz, Y. Charnay. 2000. Early-onset familial Alzheimer disease with coexisting β-amyloid and prion pathology. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 283: 1689
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 166 (3)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 166, Issue 3
1 Feb 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cutting Edge: The Neurotoxic Prion Peptide Fragment PrP106–126 Is a Chemotactic Agonist for the G Protein-Coupled Receptor Formyl Peptide Receptor-Like 1
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Cutting Edge: The Neurotoxic Prion Peptide Fragment PrP106–126 Is a Chemotactic Agonist for the G Protein-Coupled Receptor Formyl Peptide Receptor-Like 1
Yingying Le, Hiroshi Yazawa, Wanghua Gong, Zuxi Yu, Victor J. Ferrans, Philip M. Murphy, Ji Ming Wang
The Journal of Immunology February 1, 2001, 166 (3) 1448-1451; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.3.1448

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Cutting Edge: The Neurotoxic Prion Peptide Fragment PrP106–126 Is a Chemotactic Agonist for the G Protein-Coupled Receptor Formyl Peptide Receptor-Like 1
Yingying Le, Hiroshi Yazawa, Wanghua Gong, Zuxi Yu, Victor J. Ferrans, Philip M. Murphy, Ji Ming Wang
The Journal of Immunology February 1, 2001, 166 (3) 1448-1451; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.3.1448
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results and Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Cutting Edge: Mouse SARS-CoV-2 Epitope Reveals Infection and Vaccine-Elicited CD8 T Cell Responses
  • Cutting Edge: Hypoxia-Induced Ubc9 Promoter Hypermethylation Regulates IL-17 Expression in Ulcerative Colitis
  • Cutting Edge: Heterogeneity in Cell Age Contributes to Functional Diversity of NK Cells
Show more Cutting Edge

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Public Access
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606