Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Inhibition of Borrelia burgdorferi-Tick Interactions In Vivo by Outer Surface Protein A Antibody

Utpal Pal, Ruth R. Montgomery, Denise Lusitani, Pierre Voet, Vincent Weynants, Stephen E. Malawista, Yves Lobet and Erol Fikrig
J Immunol June 15, 2001, 166 (12) 7398-7403; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.166.12.7398
Utpal Pal
Section of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ruth R. Montgomery
Section of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Denise Lusitani
Section of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pierre Voet
SmithKline Beecham Biologicals, Rixensart, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vincent Weynants
SmithKline Beecham Biologicals, Rixensart, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen E. Malawista
Section of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yves Lobet
SmithKline Beecham Biologicals, Rixensart, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erol Fikrig
Section of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Borrelia burgdorferi outer surface protein (Osp) A is preferentially expressed by spirochetes in the Ixodes scapularis gut and facilitates pathogen-vector adherence in vitro. Here we examined B. burgdorferi-tick interactions in vivo by using Abs directed against OspA from each of the three major B. burgdorferi sensu lato genospecies: B. burgdorferi sensu stricto, Borrelia afzelii, and Borrelia garinii. Abs directed against B. burgdorferi sensu stricto (isolate N40) destroy the spirochete and can protect mice from infection. In contrast, antisera raised against OspA from B. afzelii (isolate ACA-1) and B. garinii (isolate ZQ-1) bind to B. burgdorferi N40 but are not borreliacidal against the N40 isolate. Our present studies assess whether these selected OspA Abs interfere with B. burgdorferi-tick attachment in a murine model of Lyme disease with I. scapularis. We examined engorged ticks that had fed on B. burgdorferi N40-infected scid mice previously treated with OspA (N40, ACA-1, ZQ-1, or mAb C3.78) or control Abs. OspA-N40 antisera or mAb C3.78 destroyed B. burgdorferi N40 within the engorged ticks. In contrast, treatment of mice with OspA-ACA-1 and OspA-ZQ-1 antisera did not kill B. burgdorferi N40 within the ticks but did effectively interfere with B. burgdorferi-I. scapularis adherence, thereby preventing efficient colonization of the vector. These studies show that nonborreliacidal OspA Abs can inhibit B. burgdorferi attachment to the tick gut, highlighting the importance of OspA in spirochete-arthropod interactions in vivo.

BBorrelia burgdorferi sensu lato is the etiologic agent of Lyme disease, a spirochetal infection that is predominantly transmitted by Ixodes scapularis and Ixodes ricinus ticks (1, 2, 3). Lyme disease is the most common vector-borne disease in the United States and has been widely documented in many parts of the world, including Europe and Asia (1). B. burgdorferi sensu lato contains at least nine distinct genospecies from different geographic locations (2). The most abundant genospecies associated with human disease include B. burgdorferi sensu stricto, which is common in both the United States and Europe, and Borrelia afzelii and Borrelia garinii, which are primarily distributed throughout Europe (1, 2). During infection, B. burgdorferi are first deposited in the skin, often resulting in a pathognomonic cutaneous lesion, erythema migrans, and subsequently disseminate to many organs (3). If left untreated, the spirochetes may eventually cause disease involving the joints, heart, and nervous system (3).

In North America, B. burgdorferi are maintained in a complex enzootic cycle involving wild rodents and I. scapularis ticks (4). Experimental laboratory models with mice have been developed to study the elaborate B. burgdorferi life cycle and provide insight into the pathogenesis of Lyme disease (5, 6). Mice infected with B. burgdorferi by intradermal experimental syringe challenge or via tick transmission develop an initial cutaneous infection that remains localized to the skin for up to 1 wk (7). Spirochetes then disseminate to distant tissues, and arthritis and carditis become apparent at 2–3 wk (7). Disease resolves in immunocompetent mice over several weeks, but the mice remain persistently infected (7); in SCID mice, disease and infection continue indefinitely (5). The spirochete undergoes major alterations in antigenic composition as it migrates from the arthropod vector to the mammalian host, and these changes may aid in immune evasion or pathogenesis (4). As one example, B. burgdorferi express outer surface protein (Osp)3 A in the tick gut, and then down-regulate OspA and up-regulate OspC during engorgement and early infection within mammals (8, 9, 10, 11). During mammalian infection, decorin binding protein A and BBK32 (a fibronectin binding protein) appear to have a role in adherence of B. burgdorferi to the extracellular matrix, and several other Ags are preferentially produced by the spirochete in the vertebrate (12, 13). In addition, B. burgdorferi undergo antigenic variation involving specific loci such as the vls gene cluster, and this may also contribute to immune evasion and spirochete persistence (14).

Recombinant OspA elicits protective immunity in mice and humans and serves as a Lyme disease vaccine (15, 16). OspA is a transmission-blocking vaccine that affects spirochetes in the arthropod (8). OspA Abs enter the tick during the feeding process and destroy spirochetes in the gut—before B. burgdorferi have had the opportunity to down-regulate OspA (8, 17). During murine infection, OspA generally is not expressed (9, 18, 19). Then, when larval ticks engorge on B. burgdorferi-infected mice, the spirochetes once again up-regulate OspA during migration to the tick (19). Indeed, the postinfection administration of OspA Abs to B. burgdorferi-infected mice has little or no effect on the murine infection, but such Abs are able to interfere with the establishment of B. burgdorferi infection within the feeding tick (17, 20). The temporal and tissue-specific expression of OspA in the gut of the tick suggests that OspA may have a function in the vector, and we have recently shown that OspA mediates the attachment of B. burgdorferi to I. scapularis in vitro (21). In our study, recombinant nonlipidated OspA from B. burgdorferi bound to the I. scapularis gut tissue and this attachment was partially abrogated by site-directed mutagenesis of OspA aa 229–247 (21).

Here we examine spirochete-tick adherence in vivo by using the differential protective capacity of OspA antisera from selected Borrelia genospecies. It has been shown that antigenic diversity in OspA among the B. burgdorferi sensu lato genospecies can result in a lack of cross-protection by OspA antisera (22, 23). For instance, OspA antisera against a B. burgdorferi sensu stricto isolate may not necessarily protect mice against challenge with a B. afzelii or B. garinii isolate and vice versa (22, 23). Protective OspA Abs prominently bind to epitopes within the carboxyl terminal half of OspA, and antigenic diversity within this region of OspA influences the ability of protective OspA Abs to kill B. burgdorferi (24, 25). For example, active immunization of mice with OspA from B. burgdorferi N40 or passive immunization with OspA-N40 mAb C3.78 is protective against B. burgdorferi N40 but not B. burgdorferi 25015 (26). This lack of cross protection is attributable to several amino acid differences in the carboxyl terminus of OspA between B. burgdorferi 25015 and B. burgdorferi N40 that alter the ability of protective B. burgdorferi OspA N40 Abs to bind to B. burgdorferi 25015 (26). Therefore, we now have used OspA mAb C3.78 and OspA antisera from three B. burgdorferi sensu lato genospecies, B. burgdorferi sensu stricto (isolate N40), B. afzelii (isolate ACA-1), and B. garinii (isolate ZQ-1), to differentiate the roles of in vitro characterized borreliacidal and nonborreliacidal OspA Abs in spirochete-vector interactions and to investigate the importance of OspA in B. burgdorferi-tick adherence in vivo.

Materials and Methods

B. burgdorferi and I. scapularis

A low-passage clonal isolate of B. burgdorferi N40 that is infectious to mice was used throughout (27). Spirochetes were cultivated in Barbour-Stoenner-Kelly (BSK) II medium at 33°C. Adult female I. scapularis ticks were collected in Connecticut. The egg mass was laid in the laboratory. Hatched larvae were allowed to feed on uninfected C3H mice to produce pathogen-free nymphs. All tick rearing was performed in an incubator at 26°C in 85% relative humidity and a 12-h light-dark photoperiod cycle.

Antisera and mAb

B. burgdorferi N40 OspA mAb C3.78, which can protect mice from spirochete infection, was purified from a C3.78-producing hybridoma culture supernatant (16). Supernatant (40 ml) was passed over a 0.5-ml protein A column (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) that then was washed twice with 20 ml of PBS, pH 7.4. The bound IgG was eluted in 1 ml of 0.1 M glycine, pH 3.0. The Ab then was concentrated and desalted with a spin column (Amicon, Beverly, MA), and the protein concentration was determined by using a Bio-Rad protein assay kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories) with BSA (American Bioanalyticals, Natick, MA) as a standard. The concentration of purified C3.78 IgG was 11.25 μg/ml.

Polyclonal rabbit antisera against recombinant OspA from B. afzelii (isolate ACA-1) and B. garinii (isolate ZQ-1) were supplied by SmithKline Beecham Biologicals (Philadelphia, PA; Ref. 22). Rabbit antisera against recombinant OspA-, OspF-, and OspE-related protein (Erp) T from B. burgdorferi N40 have been described previously by our group (16, 28, 29). OspF is encoded by a member of a multigene family (erps) that are differentially expressed throughout the B. burgdorferi life cycle (30). B. burgdorferi erpT is preferentially expressed in vivo, and antiserum directed against ErpT is not borreliacidal (28).

ELISA

Microtiter wells (ICN Biomedical, Costa Mesa, CA) were coated with 0.1 μg of recombinant OspA-N40 and incubated overnight at 4°C. Nonspecific sites then were blocked by PBS with 15% FBS. The wells were incubated with 100 μl of OspA antisera in PBS with 0.05% Tween 20 (PBS-T) at 37°C for 1 h. Abs specific for OspAs were detected with HRP-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) for 1 h at 37°C. After incubation with tetramethylbenzidine peroxidase substrate (Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories, Gaithersburg, MD) for 15 min, the absorbance at 450 nm was measured.

Immunoblot

Wild-type or mutant recombinant OspAs from B. burgdorferi N40 with selected amino acid mutations (designated M4, M5, and M6) in the major tick gut-OspA binding epitope (aa 229–247) were expressed and purified in the nonlipidated form without a fusion partner (21). The amino acid number and sequence in single-letter abbreviation in these mutant OspAs are M4 (K231 to ΔA), M5 (VF236–237 to ΔGS), M6 (TIT242–244 to ΔANA; Ref. 21). Mutant OspAs together with wild-type OspA and an OspA (M3) with a mutation in another region of the protein (EVFK100–103 to ΔAVFA) were probed with OspA mAb C3.78 by immunoblot. Two micrograms of recombinant OspA were electrophoresed in a 10% SDS-PAGE, transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes, and then incubated with mAb C3.78 (1/100 dilution). The signal was detected with a goat anti-mouse IgG-conjugated alkaline phosphatase (Sigma).

Ab characterization in vitro

Immunofluorescence.

For staining of cultured spirochetes, B. burgdorferi N40 (107 spirochetes/ml) were suspended in PBS and 10-μl aliquots were placed on sialylated glass slides (PGC Scientific, Gaithersburg, MD) and allowed to air dry. Each slide then was fixed with acetone for 5 min, washed three times with PBS, and incubated in PBS-T with 5% FCS (blocking buffer) for 30 min at room temperature. The samples were then labeled with OspA antisera at a dilution of 1/100 in blocking buffer, washed, and subsequently incubated for 1 h with FITC-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG (Sigma). The samples were washed three times with PBS-T, mounted in glycerol, and examined with a Zeiss Axioskop fluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss, Thornwood, NY).

[3H]Adenine incorporation and bactericidal assay.

Abs were tested for their bactericidal activity against B. burgdorferi N40 both by dark-field microscopy and by monitoring the uptake of [3H]adenine (31, 32). Spirochetes (5 × 106/ml) were incubated in rabbit sera (Sigma) with selected OspA or control Abs (1/25 dilution) for 24 h at 37°C, after which the percentage of viable spirochetes was determined by dark-field microscopy. Fifty-microliter aliquots were plated in 96-well plates with 200 μl of BSK/20% rabbit serum/[3H]adenine (5 μCi/well; ICN Biomedical), for 48 h at 33°C. Incorporation of [3H]adenine by dividing spirochetes increases in a linear fashion over 48 h with a spirochete density of 1 × 104 to 1 × 106/ml (31). In addition, for visual detection of spirochete viability, aliquots (10 μl) were assessed for spirochete motility and refractivity in five random fields by dark-field microscopy. Spirochetes were considered killed when complete loss of motility and refractivity was observed. Control samples were treated with PBS or control nonbactericidal B. burgdorferi N40 Abs such as OspF or ErpT antisera. In addition, 100-μl samples were removed from each tube, inoculated into 5 ml of BSK medium, and incubated at 33°C for 5 days. The B. burgdorferi then were counted, and these results were compared with the initial viability by dark-field microscopy in a double-blind manner. Bactericidal assays also were performed with different concentrations of OspA mAb C3.78.

In vivo infection and adherence studies

Pathogen-free NCr immunodeficient mice (NCr-SCID) from the National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD) were infected with B. burgdorferi N40 (105 spirochetes/mouse, 3–5 animals/group) by intradermal injection into the back. After 4 wk, mAb C3.78 (2.5 μg) or selected polyclonal antisera were administered to groups of mice (100 μl i.p. and 100 μl s.c.). Twenty-four hours later, 10 I. scapularis nymphs were placed on each mouse. The animals again were treated with mAb or antisera on the next day. The nymphs were allowed to feed to repletion and detach from the mice, which usually occurred at ∼72 h. Guts from each group of nymphs were dissected under a microscope in PBS (20 μl/gut) and examined at 24, 48, 72, and 96 h after tick detachment. Five-microliter aliquots were examined for viable spirochetes under dark-field microscopy. Selected nymphs from each group also were reared in an incubator at 26°C with 85% relative humidity and a 12-h light-dark photoperiod regimen for ∼1 mo until they molted to adults.

Organs from nymphal ticks were prepared for microscopy as described previously (33) by dissection of gut diverticula in PBS (20 μl/gut). The lumen of each gut diverticulum was exposed by a vertical incision with a fine blade so that individual diverticula were separated from each other, and both ends were opened to facilitate outflow of blood. The organs were washed three times under a dissecting microscope until the cessation of visible flow of blood from open diverticula. The isolated organs were placed on sialylated glass slides (PGC Scientific) to enhance attachment, allowed to dry, and fixed with acetone for 5 min. Acetone-fixed slides were rinsed twice with PBS and incubated for 30 min with PBS-T and 5% normal goat serum at room temperature. Organs were incubated with an affinity-purified FITC-labeled goat anti-B. burgdorferi Ab (Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories) at a dilution of 1/50 in PBS-T with 5% normal goat serum at room temperature for 1 h. The samples were counterstained with propidium iodide (50 μl of a 10-μg/ml solution) for 3 min at room temperature, washed three times with PBS-T, and mounted in glycerol for examination. The tissues were viewed with a Zeiss LSM 510 scanning laser confocal microscope equipped with an argon/krypton laser. The distribution of spirochetes in the gut was determined by scanning the entire organ from end to end and throughout its depth at each point.

Statistical analysis

Results are expressed as the mean ± SE. The significance of the difference between the mean values of the groups was evaluated by Student’s t test or repeated-measure ANOVA with the Fisher protected least significant difference test with Statview software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

Results

Characterization of OspA Abs

The borreliacidal activities of OspA antisera and mAb were characterized so that the influence of these Abs on B. burgdorferi-I. scapularis interactions in vivo could be studied. C3.78 is an OspA mAb directed against B. burgdorferi N40 that can protect mice from B. burgdorferi N40 infection (16). We first determined that 0.4 μg/ml of mAb C3.78 was sufficient to kill the vast majority of B. burgdorferi N40 in vitro (Table I⇓). As expected, we then demonstrated that antisera against OspA from B. burgdorferi N40 (OspA-N40), but not antisera against OspA from B. afzelii ACA-1 (OspA-ACA-1) or B. garinii ZQ-1 (OspA-ZQ-1), were able to kill B. burgdorferi N40 (Table I⇓). Similar bactericidal activities of mAb C3.78 and OspA-N40 antisera were detected in our bactericidal assay when heat-inactivated serum was used (data not shown). Therefore, for the purpose of this study, we termed N40 Abs (mAb C3.78 and OspA-N40 antisera) as “borrelicidal” and non-N40 Abs (OspA-ACA-1 and OspA-ZQ-1) were termed as “nonborrelicidal.” Control antisera against OspF-N40 or ErpT-N40 (a B. burgdorferi gene expressed in vivo) did not have significant borreliacidal activity (Table I⇓). However, antisera against OspA-ACA-1 or OspA-ZQ-1 were able to kill B. afzelii and B. garinii at dilutions of 1/3000 and 1/7000, respectively (data not shown). The borreliacidal effect of the Abs studied was determined both visually, by loss of motility, and was confirmed after an extended period of time by incorporation of [3H]adenine into dividing spirochetes.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table I.

Borreliacidal activity of OspA Abs against B. burgdorferi N40a

In contrast to their strain-specific killing capacity, all of the OspA Abs were able to bind to OspA-N40. Each of the OspA antisera strongly stained B. burgdorferi N40 spirochetes as shown by immunofluorescence microscopy (Fig. 1⇓A) and recognized recombinant OspA-N40 in ELISA to a dilution of at least 1/12,500 (Fig. 1⇓B). Therefore, OspA-ACA-1 or OspA-ZQ-1 antisera effectively bound to, but did not kill, B. burgdorferi N40. Moreover, in a standard agglutination assay (34), neither of these OspA antisera resulted in appreciable agglutination of N40 spirochetes (data not shown).

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Recognition of B. burgdorferi N40 and OspA-N40 by diverse OspA Abs. A, Immunofluorescence of B. burgdorferi N40 stained with OspA-N40 (lane 1), OspA-ACA-1 (lane 2), OspA-ZQ-1 (lane 3), or without primary antisera (lane 4). Spirochetes were fixed in acetone and labeled as described in Materials and Methods. All antisera were used at a 1/100 dilution. B, OspA Ab levels by ELISA. Recombinant OspA-N40 was probed with antisera to OspA-N40, OspA-ACA-1, and OspA-ZQ-1 (at 1/100, 1/500, 1/2,500, 1/12,500, and 1/62,500 dilutions). Data shown are OD450 (mean ± SE; n = 3).

OspA Abs inhibit association of spirochetes with the tick gut in vivo

We next examined whether B. burgdorferi N40 exposed to different OspA Abs could effectively colonize I. scapularis, particularly in cases where the Abs did not have borreliacidal activity. SCID mice were used in these studies because the animals cannot mount their own humoral response to B. burgdorferi during infection; thus, the effects of the administered Abs can be evaluated without the contribution of any acquired host response to the spirochete. Groups of three SCID mice were challenged with B. burgdorferi N40, and within 4 wk all the mice had developed visible swelling of the tibiotarsal joints (data not shown). Then OspA antisera (N40, ACA-1, or ZQ-1), mAb C3.78, control (OspF or ErpT) antisera, or PBS were administered to groups of animals. Twenty-four hours later, 10 uninfected ticks were allowed to feed to repletion on each mouse, and the engorged ticks were collected. Tick guts were dissected and the luminal contents examined for B. burgdorferi under dark-field microscopy. In ticks that fed on animals treated with OspA-ACA-1 or OspA-ZQ-1 antisera, control antisera, or PBS, viable B. burgdorferi were consistently detected (Fig. 2⇓). For example, control (PBS-treated) slides (5 μl of tick content out of a total volume of 20 μl of tick content) contained 50 ± 8 spirochetes/slide (or 200 spirochetes/tick). In contrast, spirochetes were not detected in guts of ticks that had fed on mice administered OspA-N40 antisera or mAb C3.78 (Fig. 2⇓).

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Detection of B. burgdorferi within ticks after exposure to OspA Abs. Groups of from three to five B. burgdorferi-infected mice were administered selected antisera, mAb, or PBS before tick placement. OspA-ACA-1, OspA-ZQ-1, and OspA-N40 antisera and OspA mAb C3.78 were used. Control groups were treated with ErpT-N40 and OspF-N40 antisera or PBS. Three days after attachment, at least 10 engorged ticks from each group of mice were dissected and examined by dark-field microscope for motile, viable spirochetes. Fifty fields were examined under a ×43 objective, and the results are expressed relative to the B. burgdorferi within ticks that fed on control (PBS) mice (200 ± 32). Data represent the mean ± SE for three experiments. Spirochete numbers in control (PBS), ErpT-N40, OspF-0N40, OspA-ACA-1, and OspA-ZQ-1 groups were similar (ANOVA or Student’s t test, p > 0.5). Spirochete numbers in the OspA-N40 or mAb C3.78 groups were essentially zero (ANOVA or Student’s t test, p < 0.001).

To determine whether specific OspA antisera could interfere with the ability of B. burgdorferi to adhere to the tick gut, we examined Borrelia-tick tissue associations at 24, 48, 72, and 96 h after tick engorgement. The tick gut diverticula were dissected, washed to remove unbound luminal contents, and examined by double-labeled confocal microscopy. B. burgdorferi in the control groups (PBS and OspF and ErpT antisera) were found in close proximity to the lumen of the nymphal tick gut (Fig. 3⇓A and Table II⇓). In contrast, OspA-ACA-1 or OspA-ZQ-1 antisera-treated samples had fewer spirochetes associated with the gut (Fig. 3⇓A and Table II⇓). Gut diverticula were devoid of spirochetes in samples treated with OspA-N40 antisera or mAb C3.78 (Fig. 3⇓A and Table II⇓). We then examined the persistence of the spirochetes in I. scapularis by allowing some groups of ticks to molt to the adult stage. The effects of borreliacidal and nonborreliacidal Abs were maintained at the adult stage (Fig. 3⇓B).

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Distribution of B. burgdorferi within the I. scapularis gut. A, Nymphal ticks were allowed to engorge for 72 h on B. burgdorferi-infected mice that had been treated with selected antisera: OspA-N40, OspA mAb C3.78, OspA-ACA-1, OspA-ZQ-1, or controls (OspF, ErpT, and PBS). The spirochetes (arrows) were stained with an FITC-labeled goat anti-B. burgdorferi Ab (green), and the nuclei of the gut epithelial cells were stained with propidium iodide. Images from both fluorescent chambers were recorded at ×630 magnification and are presented as a single image for clarity. B, Spirochetes (arrows) in adult ticks. Selected engorged nymphal ticks (A) were allowed to molt to the adult stage and then were then examined for B. burgdorferi in a similar fashion. The representative images show that spirochetes did not flourish in the guts of tick that had been exposed as nymphs either to borreliacidal or nonborreliacidal OspA Abs. Images were recorded at ×400.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table II.

Effect of OspA Abs on attachment of B. burgdorferi to the tick guta

Bactericidal OspA mAb C3.78 binds to OspAs with mutations in major gut binding epitope

To further differentiate the regions of OspA that are important in tick gut binding from the epitopes that bind to borreliacidal OspA (24, 25), we examined whether mAb C3.78, which we know binds to the borreliacidal epitope, could bind to recombinant OspAs with mutations in the tick gut binding domain, aa 229–247. Protective OspA mAbs such as C3.78 have been shown to bind to a conformational epitope in the carboxyl terminus of OspA and are sufficient to protect mice against B. burgdorferi infection (16, 25). Our previous work demonstrated that OspA aa 229–247 contain an epitope that is important in OspA-gut binding and that mutations in this region greatly reduced OspA-gut interaction (21). Therefore, we expressed several recombinant OspAs with such mutations in this area, including M4 (K231 to ΔA), M5 (VF236–237 to ΔGS), and M6 (TIT242–244 to ΔANA) (21) and determined whether mAb C3.78 could bind to these OspAs. M5 and M6 have been shown previously to have reduced binding to the tick gut when compared with wild-type OspA (21). Wild-type OspA and a mutant OspA (M3) with an alteration in a different region of the protein (EVFK100–103 to ΔAVFA) that does not appear to be involved in spirochete-tick gut binding, served as controls. In a standard immunoblot, mAb C3.78 readily bound to wild-type or all the mutant OspAs (M4, M5, and M6) with alterations in the OspA-tick gut binding region (data not shown), suggesting that the important gut binding domain is distinct from the borreliacidal domain.

Discussion

B. burgdorferi display an array of different proteins on their outer surface throughout their life cycle, with OspA being prominently exposed within the tick vector (19). In general, B. burgdorferi express ospA in the gut of unfed ticks (8). ospA is repressed as spirochetes migrate from the tick and is not normally expressed by B. burgdorferi during murine infection (9, 18). ospA then is induced again as B. burgdorferi move from the mammalian host back into the arthropod vector (19). These temporal and tissue-specific observations suggest an important role for OspA within the tick, and it has been demonstrated that OspA facilitates B. burgdorferi-I. scapularis adherence in vitro (21). The current report used nonborreliacidal and borreliacidal OspA Abs to demonstrate the importance of OspA in spirochete colonization of the vector in vivo.

Antisera against OspA-ACA-1 and OspA-ZQ-1 were borreliacidal in vitro against B. afzelii ACA-1 and B. garinii ZQ-1, respectively (data not shown), but unable to kill B. burgdorferi N40 (Table I⇑). As expected, OspA-N40 antisera were borreliacidal against B. burgdorferi N40. These results are consistent with prior reports on the genospecies-specific borreliacidal activity of OspA antisera, both in vitro and by in vivo passive immunization studies (22, 26). In general, diversity in the carboxyl terminus of OspA among B. burgdorferi sensu lato contributes to the inability of specific borreliacidal OspA Abs to bind diverse OspAs and the lack of cross-protective immunity. The selective borreliacidal capacities of these OspA antisera provide a framework for investigation of in vivo effects of such antisera on the interaction of B. burgdorferi N40 with I. scapularis.

Our in vivo studies examine the ability of nonborreliacidal OspA antisera to prevent effective tick colonization by B. burgdorferi. To assess the effect of host OspA Abs on B. burgdorferi entry to ticks, Abs were administered to B. burgdorferi-infected mice. OspA Abs transferred after initiation of infection do not protect from infection with B. burgdorferi, in part because the spirochetes down-regulate ospA in the host (9, 18). The influence of OspA Abs becomes apparent when the spirochetes express OspA as they reenter the tick (8). We used SCID mice in this study so that acquired humoral or cellular immune responses to B. burgdorferi during the course of infection could not influence B. burgdorferi within the vector. Our in vivo experiments demonstrate that OspA antisera effectively prevent B. burgdorferi from associating with the I. scapularis gut, even those that do not kill spirochetes. Viable, motile B. burgdorferi were found in ticks exposed to OspA-ACA-1 or OspA-ZQ-1 antisera during engorgement, showing that these antisera did not hinder B. burgdorferi from entering the vector. However, the OspA-ACA-1 or OspA-ZQ-1 antisera diminished the ability of the spirochetes to associate with the gut of the engorged ticks. In addition, markedly fewer B. burgdorferi persisted through the molt from nymph to adult ticks, further demonstrating that these antisera interfered with the ability of B. burgdorferi to establish infection within the arthropod.

OspA-ACA-1 and OspA-ZQ-1 antisera may affect B. burgdorferi in several ways. Epitopes on OspA that bind borreliacidal Abs vs those that bind tick gut epithelium are likely to be different. Mapping studies have shown that protective OspA mAbs, such as LA-2 and C3.78 bind to conformational epitopes within the carboxyl terminus of OspA (25, 35). At least one of the epitopes that facilitates OspA-tick interactions is encoded within residues 229–247 (21) and we now have found that this region is not important for the binding of mAb C3.78, as these Abs bind to OspAs with mutations within residues 229–247. Nonborreliacidal OspA Abs may bind directly bind to the tick gut binding region, or alternatively, these Abs may bind to several epitopes of OspA on the B. burgdorferi surface and steric hindrance might then interfere with OspA binding to tick gut.

The mechanisms by which B. burgdorferi interact with the vector, and the influence of spirochete-tick interactions on the pathogenesis of infection remain to be fully explored. Certainly within the mammalian host, B. burgdorferi have different Ags that may serve similar functions. For example, B. burgdorferi decorin binding protein and fibronectin binding protein (BBK32) both facilitate the adherence of the spirochete to the extracellular matrix, albeit via different ligands (12, 13). Several B. burgdorferi ligands are probably involved in spirochete-tick gut interactions, and B. burgdorferi Ags that are preferentially expressed during the period of tick engorgement, such as OspC, BBK32, and BBK50 among others, may serve functions in the tick as well as the host. Ags differentially expressed during the blood meal help B. burgdorferi colonize the tick salivary glands (transiently) during the migration from the tick gut to the vertebrate host (33). Characterization of the I. scapularis ligands that interact with OspA and other B. burgdorferi Ags should increase our understanding of vector-B. burgdorferi interactions and suggest alternative protective strategies to interfere with pathogen transmission. Immunization of mice with the vector ligand for OspA or specific OspA peptides, could, theoretically at least, elicit Abs to prevent tick colonization by B. burgdorferi, and therefore interrupt the spirochete life cycle. Our current studies show that nonborreliacidal OspA Abs can block the adherence of B. burgdorferi to the tick gut and demonstrate the importance of OspA in spirochete-arthropod interactions in vivo.

Acknowledgments

We thank D. Beck for technical assistance and Syed A. Morshed and Aravinda M. de Silva for helpful discussions.

Footnotes

  • ↵1 This work was supported by grants from the National Institute of Health, Arthritis Foundation, American Heart Association, Eshe Foundation, the Community Foundation of Greater New Haven, and a gift from SmithKline Beecham Biologicals. E.F. is the recipient of a Burroughs Wellcome Clinical Scientist Award in Translational Research.

  • ↵2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Erol Fikrig, 608 Laboratory of Clinical Investigation, Section of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06520-8031. E-mail address: erol.fikrig{at}yale.edu

  • ↵3 Abbreviations used in this paper: Osp, outer surface protein; Erp, OspE-related protein.

  • Received January 11, 2001.
  • Accepted April 10, 2001.
  • Copyright © 2001 by The American Association of Immunologists

References

  1. ↵
    Nadelman, R. B., G. P. Wormser. 1998. Lyme borreliosis. Lancet 352: 557
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Wang, G., A. P. van Dam, I. Schwartz, J. Dankert. 1999. Molecular typing of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato: taxonomic, epidemiological, and clinical implications. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 12: 633
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Malawista, S. E.. 2000. Lyme Disease. W. J. Koopman, ed. Arthritis and Allied Conditions 2321 Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore.
  4. ↵
    de Silva, A. M., E. Fikrig. 1997. Arthropod- and host-specific gene expression by Borrelia burgdorferi. J. Clin. Invest. 99: 377
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Schaible, U. E., M. D. Kramer, C. Museteanu, G. Zimmer, H. Mossmann, M. M. Simon. 1989. The severe combined immunodeficiency (scid) mouse: a laboratory model for the analysis of Lyme arthritis and carditis. J. Exp. Med. 170: 1427
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Barthold, S. W., D. S. Beck, G. M. Hansen, G. A. Terwilliger, K. D. Moody. 1990. Lyme borreliosis in selected strains and ages of laboratory mice. J. Infect. Dis. 162: 133
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Barthold, S. W., M. S. de Souza, J. L. Janotka, A. L. Smith, D. H. Persing. 1993. Chronic Lyme borreliosis in the laboratory mouse. Am. J. Pathol. 143: 959
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    de Silva, A. M., S. R. Telford, L. R. Brunet, S. W. Barthold, E. Fikrig. 1996. Borrelia burgdorferi OspA is an arthropod-specific transmission-blocking Lyme disease vaccine. J. Exp. Med. 183: 271
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Montgomery, R. R., S. E. Malawista, K. J. Feen, L. K. Bockenstedt. 1996. Direct demonstration of antigenic substitution of Borrelia burgdorferi ex vivo: exploration of the paradox of the early immune response to outer surface proteins A and C in Lyme disease. J. Exp. Med. 183: 261
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Coleman, J. L., J. A. Gebbia, J. Piesman, J. L. Degen, T. H. Bugge, J. L. Benach. 1997. Plasminogen is required for efficient dissemination of Borrelia burgdorferi in ticks and for enhancement of spirochetemia in mice. Cell 89: 1111
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Schwan, T. G., J. Piesman, W. T. Golde, M. C. Dolan, P. A. Rosa. 1995. Induction of an outer surface protein on Borrelia burgdorferi during tick feeding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 2909
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Probert, W. S., B. J. Johnson. 1998. Identification of a 47 kDa fibronectin-binding protein expressed by Borrelia burgdorferi isolate B31. Mol. Microbiol. 30: 1003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Hanson, M. S., D. R. Cassatt, B. P. Guo, N. K. Patel, M. P. McCarthy, D. W. Dorward, M. Hook. 1998. Active and passive immunity against Borrelia burgdorferi decorin binding protein A (DbpA) protects against infection. Infect. Immun. 66: 2143
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Zhang, J. R., J. M. Hardham, A. G. Barbour, S. J. Norris. 1997. Antigenic variation in Lyme disease borreliae by promiscuous recombination of VMP-like sequence cassettes. Cell 89: 275
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Sigal, L. H., J. M. Zahradnik, P. Lavin, S. J. Patella, G. Bryant, R. Haselby, E. Hilton, M. Kunkel, D. Adler-Klein, T. Doherty, et al 1998. A vaccine consisting of recombinant Borrelia burgdorferi outer-surface protein A to prevent Lyme disease: Recombinant Outer-Surface Protein A Lyme Disease Vaccine Study Consortium. N. Engl. J. Med. 339: 216
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Fikrig, E., S. W. Barthold, F. S. Kantor, R. A. Flavell. 1990. Protection of mice against the Lyme disease agent by immunizing with recombinant OspA. Science 250: 553
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    de Silva, A. M., N. S. Zeidner, Y. Zhang, M. C. Dolan, J. Piesman, E. Fikrig. 1999. Influence of outer surface protein A antibody on Borrelia burgdorferi within feeding ticks. Infect. Immun. 67: 30
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Golde, W. T., K. J. Kappel, G. Dequesne, C. Feron, D. Plainchamp, C. Capiau, Y. Lobet. 1994. Tick transmission of Borrelia burgdorferi to inbred strains of mice induces an antibody response to P39 but not to outer surface protein A. Infect. Immun. 62: 2625
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Schwan, T. G., J. Piesman. 2000. Temporal changes in outer surface proteins A and C of the Lyme disease-associated spirochete, Borrelia burgdorferi, during the chain of infection in ticks and mice. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38: 382
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    de Silva, A. M., D. Fish, T. R. Burkot, Y. Zhang, E. Fikrig. 1997. OspA antibodies inhibit the acquisition of Borrelia burgdorferi by Ixodes ticks. Infect. Immun. 65: 3146
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Pal, U., A. M. de Silva, R. R. Montgomery, D. Fish, J. Anguita, J. F. Anderson, Y. Lobet, E. Fikrig. 2000. Attachment of Borrelia burgdorferi within Ixodes scapularis mediated by outer surface protein A. J. Clin. Invest. 106: 561
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Gern, L., C. M. Hu, P. Voet, P. Hauser, Y. Lobet. 1997. Immunization with a polyvalent OspA vaccine protects mice against Ixodes ricinus tick bites infected by Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto, Borrelia garinii, and Borrelia afzelii. Vaccine 15: 1551
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Schaible, U. E., R. Wallich, M. D. Kramer, L. Gern, J. F. Anderson, C. Museteanu, M. M. Simon. 1993. Immune sera to individual Borrelia burgdorferi isolates or recombinant OspA thereof protect SCID mice against infection with homologous strains but only partially or not at all against those of different OspA/OspB genotype. Vaccine 11: 1049
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Golde, W. T., J. Piesman, M. C. Dolan, M. Kramer, P. Hauser, Y. Lobet, C. Capiau, P. Desmons, P. Voet, D. Dearwester, J. C. Frantz. 1997. Reactivity with a specific epitope of outer surface protein A predicts protection from infection with the Lyme disease spirochete. Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect. Immun. 65: 882
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Sears, J. E., E. Fikrig, T. Y. Nakagawa, K. Deponte, N. Marcantonio, F. S. Kantor, R. A. Flavell. 1991. Molecular mapping of Osp-A mediated immunity against Borrelia burgdorferi, the agent of Lyme disease. J. Immunol. 147: 1995
    OpenUrlAbstract
  26. ↵
    Fikrig, E., S. W. Barthold, D. H. Persing, X. Sun, F. S. Kantor, R. A. Flavell. 1992. Borrelia burgdorferi strain 25015: characterization of outer surface protein A and vaccination against infection. J. Immunol. 148: 2256
    OpenUrlAbstract
  27. ↵
    Barthold, S. W., E. Fikrig, L. K. Bockenstedt, D. H. Persing. 1995. Circumvention of outer surface protein A immunity by host-adapted Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect. Immun. 63: 2255
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Fikrig, E., M. Chen, S. W. Barthold, J. Anguita, W. Feng, S. R. Telford, R. A. Flavell. 1999. Borrelia burgdorferi erpT expression in the arthropod vector and murine host. Mol. Microbiol. 31: 281
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Lam, T. T., T. P. Nguyen, R. R. Montgomery, F. S. Kantor, E. Fikrig, R. A. Flavell. 1994. Outer surface proteins E and F of Borrelia burgdorferi, the agent of Lyme disease. Infect. Immun. 62: 290
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    Stevenson, B., J. L. Bono, T. G. Schwan, P. Rosa. 1998. Borrelia burgdorferi Erp proteins are immunogenic in mammals infected by tick-bite, and their synthesis is inducible in cultured bacteria. Infect. Immun. 66: 2648
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    Pavia, C. S., S. Bittker. 1988. Assessment of in vitro growth of Borrelia burgdorferi by tritiated adenine incorporation. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 539: 410
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. ↵
    Kochi, S. K., R. C. Johnson. 1988. Role of immunoglobulin G in killing of Borrelia burgdorferi by the classical complement pathway. Infect. Immun. 56: 314
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    de Silva, A. M., E. Fikrig. 1995. Growth and migration of Borrelia burgdorferi in Ixodes ticks during blood feeding. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 53: 397
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    Sadziene, A., P. A. Thompson, A. G. Barbour. 1992. In vitro inhibition of Borrelia burgdorferi growth by antibodies. J. Infect. Dis. 167: 165
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    Li, H., J. J. Dunn, B. J. Luft, C. L. Lawson. 1997. Crystal structure of Lyme disease antigen outer surface protein A complexed with an Fab. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 3584
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 166 (12)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 166, Issue 12
15 Jun 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Inhibition of Borrelia burgdorferi-Tick Interactions In Vivo by Outer Surface Protein A Antibody
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
Citation Tools
Inhibition of Borrelia burgdorferi-Tick Interactions In Vivo by Outer Surface Protein A Antibody
Utpal Pal, Ruth R. Montgomery, Denise Lusitani, Pierre Voet, Vincent Weynants, Stephen E. Malawista, Yves Lobet, Erol Fikrig
The Journal of Immunology June 15, 2001, 166 (12) 7398-7403; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.12.7398

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Inhibition of Borrelia burgdorferi-Tick Interactions In Vivo by Outer Surface Protein A Antibody
Utpal Pal, Ruth R. Montgomery, Denise Lusitani, Pierre Voet, Vincent Weynants, Stephen E. Malawista, Yves Lobet, Erol Fikrig
The Journal of Immunology June 15, 2001, 166 (12) 7398-7403; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.12.7398
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Early Self-Regulatory Mechanisms Control the Magnitude of CD8+ T Cell Responses Against Liver Stages of Murine Malaria
  • Sublethal Hyperoxia Impairs Pulmonary Innate Immunity
  • Dependence of IL-4, IL-13, and Nematode-Induced Alterations in Murine Small Intestinal Smooth Muscle Contractility on Stat6 and Enteric Nerves
Show more Host Defense

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Public Access
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2019 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606