Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
      • Neuroimmunology: To Sense and Protect
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

The Anti-Tumor Activity of IL-12: Mechanisms of Innate Immunity That Are Model and Dose Dependent

Mark J. Smyth, Masaru Taniguchi and Shayna E. A. Street
J Immunol September 1, 2000, 165 (5) 2665-2670; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.165.5.2665
Mark J. Smyth
*Cancer Immunology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, St. Andrews Place, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Masaru Taniguchi
†Division of Molecular Immunology, Center of Biomedical Sciences, Chiba University School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shayna E. A. Street
*Cancer Immunology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, St. Andrews Place, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    The dose and timing of IL-12 treatment dictate the relative roles of NK cells and NKT cells in its anti-metastatic effect against B16F10 melanoma. a, Groups of five B6, B6.pfp−/−, B6.IFN-γ−/−, or B6.Jα281−/− mice or B6 mice treated with anti-NK1.1 mAb on days −2, 0 (the day of B16F10 tumor inoculation), and 7 were inoculated i.v. with decreasing numbers (5 × 105, 1 × 105, 5 × 104) of B16F10 tumor cells as indicated. b, Groups of 5–10 mice, as described above, including B6.RAG-1−/− mice, were inoculated i.v. with 5 × 105 B16F10 tumor cells (untreated). Similar groups of mice were treated i.p. with 250 U of IL-12 on days −5, −4, −3, −2, −1 before and days 1–5 after B16F10 tumor inoculation (high). c, Groups of five B6, B6.Jα281−/−, B6.pfp−/−, and B6.IFN-γ−/− mice or B6 mice treated with anti-NK1.1 mAb were inoculated i.v. with 5 × 105 B16F10 tumor cells (untreated). Similar groups of mice were treated i.p. with 250 U of IL-12 on days 3–12 after B16F10 tumor inoculation (delayed) or with 50 U of IL-12 on days −5, −4, −3, −2, and −1 before and days 1–5 after tumor inoculation (low). In all experiments, 14 days after tumor inoculation the lungs of these mice were harvested, and colonies were counted and recorded as the mean number of colonies ± SE. Asterisks indicate the groups in which IL-12 treatment significantly enhanced that group’s number of lung metastases above that in the same treated control wild-type B6 mice (by Mann-Whitney test: ∗, p < 0.05; ∗∗, p < 0.01).

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    NK cells and pfp are sufficient for the anti-metastatic effect of IL-12 against EL4-S3 lymphoma. a, Groups of 10 B6, B6.Pfp−/−, B6.IFN-γ−/−, B6.RAG-1−/−, or B6.Jα281−/− mice or B6 mice treated with anti-NK1.1 mAb on days −2, 0 (the day of B16F10 tumor inoculation), and 7 were inoculated i.v. with 5 × 103 EL4-S3 tumor cells as indicated. b, Groups of mice as described above were inoculated i.v. with 5 × 104 EL4-S3 tumor cells (untreated). Similar groups of mice were treated i.p. with 250 U of IL-12 on days −5, −4, −3, −2, and −1 before and days 1–5 after EL4-S3 tumor inoculation (high). c, Groups of 5–10 B6 and B6.Jα281−/− mice or B6 mice treated with anti-NK1.1 mAb were inoculated i.v. with 5 × 104 EL4-S3 tumor cells (untreated). Similar groups of mice were treated i.p. with 250 U of IL-12 on days 3–12 after EL4-S3 tumor inoculation (delayed) or with 50 U of IL-12 on days −5, −4, −3, −2, and −1 before and days 1–5 after tumor inoculation (low). In all experiments, 14 days after tumor inoculation the lungs of these mice were harvested and fixed, and colonies counted and recorded as the mean number of colonies ± SE. Asterisks indicate the groups in which IL-12 treatment significantly enhanced that group’s number of lung metastases above that in control wild-type treated B6 mice (by Mann-Whitney test: ∗, p < 0.05; ∗∗, p < 0.01).

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    RM-1: NK cells, NKT cells, pfp, and IFN-γ contribute to the anti-metastatic effect of IL-12. a, Groups of 5–10 B6, B6.pfp−/−, B6.IFN-γ−/−, B6.RAG-1−/−, and B6.Jα281−/− mice or B6 mice treated with anti-NK1.1 mAb (on days −2, 0 (the day of i.v. RM-1 tumor inoculation), and 7) were inoculated s.c. between the shoulder blades with RM-1 tumor cells (2 × 106), and tumors were allowed to establish for 9 days. Subcutaneous tumors were then resected, and 1 × 104 RM-1 cells were injected i.v. via the tail vein. b, Groups of mice as described above were inoculated i.v. with 1 × 105 RM-1 tumor cells (untreated). Similar groups of mice were treated i.p. with 250 U of IL-12 on days −5, −4, −3, −2, and −1 before and days 1–5 after RM-1 tumor inoculation (high). c, Groups of 5–10 B6 and B6.Jα281−/− mice or B6 mice treated with anti-NK1.1 mAb were inoculated i.v. with 1 × 105 RM-1 tumor cells (untreated). Similar groups of mice were treated i.p. with 250 U of IL-12 on days 3–12 after RM-1 tumor inoculation (delayed) or with 50 U of IL-12 on days −5, −4, −3, −2, and −1 before and days 1–5 after tumor inoculation (low). In all experiments, 14 days after tumor inoculation the lungs of these mice were harvested and fixed, and colonies were counted and recorded as the mean number of colonies ± SE. Asterisks indicate the groups in which IL-12 treatment significantly enhanced that group’s number of lung metastases above that in control wild-type treated B6 mice (by Mann-Whitney test: ∗, p < 0.05; ∗∗, p < 0.01).

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 165 (5)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 165, Issue 5
1 Sep 2000
  • Table of Contents
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Anti-Tumor Activity of IL-12: Mechanisms of Innate Immunity That Are Model and Dose Dependent
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Anti-Tumor Activity of IL-12: Mechanisms of Innate Immunity That Are Model and Dose Dependent
Mark J. Smyth, Masaru Taniguchi, Shayna E. A. Street
The Journal of Immunology September 1, 2000, 165 (5) 2665-2670; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.5.2665

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Anti-Tumor Activity of IL-12: Mechanisms of Innate Immunity That Are Model and Dose Dependent
Mark J. Smyth, Masaru Taniguchi, Shayna E. A. Street
The Journal of Immunology September 1, 2000, 165 (5) 2665-2670; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.5.2665
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results and Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Early Self-Regulatory Mechanisms Control the Magnitude of CD8+ T Cell Responses Against Liver Stages of Murine Malaria
  • Sublethal Hyperoxia Impairs Pulmonary Innate Immunity
  • Dependence of IL-4, IL-13, and Nematode-Induced Alterations in Murine Small Intestinal Smooth Muscle Contractility on Stat6 and Enteric Nerves
Show more HOST DEFENSE

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • FAR 889
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606