Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
      • Neuroimmunology: To Sense and Protect
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Cutting Edge: The T Cell Chemoattractant IFN-Inducible Protein 10 Is Essential in Host Defense Against Viral-Induced Neurologic Disease

Michael T. Liu, Benjamin P. Chen, Patricia Oertel, Michael J. Buchmeier, David Armstrong, Thomas A. Hamilton and Thomas E. Lane
J Immunol September 1, 2000, 165 (5) 2327-2330; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.165.5.2327
Michael T. Liu
*Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, University of California, Irvine, CA 92612;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benjamin P. Chen
*Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, University of California, Irvine, CA 92612;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patricia Oertel
*Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, University of California, Irvine, CA 92612;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael J. Buchmeier
†Department of Neuropharmacology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Armstrong
‡Department of Immunology, The Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH 44195
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas A. Hamilton
‡Department of Immunology, The Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH 44195
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas E. Lane
*Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, University of California, Irvine, CA 92612;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The contribution of the T cell chemoattractant chemokine IFN-inducible protein 10 (IP-10) in host defense following viral infection of the CNS was examined. IP-10 is expressed by astrocytes during acute encephalomyelitis in mouse hepatitis virus-infected mice, and the majority of T lymphocytes infiltrating into the CNS expressed the IP-10 receptor CXCR3. Treatment of mice with anti-IP-10 antisera led to increased mortality and delayed viral clearance from the CNS as compared with control mice. Further, administration of anti-IP-10 led to a >70% reduction (p ≤ 0.001) in CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocyte infiltration into the CNS, which correlated with decreased (p ≤ 0.01) levels of IFN-γ. These data indicate that IP-10 functions as a sentinel molecule in host defense and is essential in the development of a protective Th1 response against viral infection of the CNS.

Chemokines have been the subject of numerous studies to define the functional contributions of these molecules in inflammation (for review, see Ref. 1). Growing evidence indicates that chemokine expression represents a pivotal point in host defense by initiating specific inflammatory events that lead to leukocyte activation, extravasation, migration, and ultimately clearance of foreign Ag (2, 3, 4). IFN-inducible protein 10 (IP-10)3 is a non-ELR (glutamic acid-leucine-arginine) CXC chemokine that has been shown to be a potent chemoattractant for activated T cells and NK cells by binding to the receptor CXCR3 (5, 6, 7, 8). Both human and mouse IP-10 expression is inducible by type I and II IFNs following treatment of a wide variety of cell types (9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18). Functionally, IP-10 is thought to contribute to various inflammatory pathologies by attracting leukocytes to sites of infection or injury (19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27). In addition, IP-10 exhibits antitumor properties by inhibiting angiogenesis and has recently been shown to exhibit an antiviral role (4, 28, 29).

IP-10 is expressed early within the CNS in response to infection with a wide variety of viruses (30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37). Expression often represents a dominant and localized response, suggesting that IP-10 acts as a sentinel molecule in host defense by serving to initiate and maintain an inflammatory response (38). However, the contributions of IP-10 in response to viral infection of the CNS have not been fully evaluated. To assess functional significance, IP-10 activity was selectively neutralized by administration of anti-IP-10 antisera to mice infected with the neurotropic coronavirus mouse hepatitis virus (MHV). The results presented indicate that IP-10 is an essential component in host defense by coordinating the trafficking of Th1 T lymphocytes into the CNS in response to viral infection.

Materials and Methods

Virus and mice

The MHV strain V5A13.1 (referred to henceforth as MHV) was derived from wild-type MHV-4 as previously described (39). Age matched (5–7 wk), male wild-type C57BL/6 mice (H-2b background) were used for studies described. Mice were purchased from Harlan Sprague-Dawley Laboratories (San Diego, CA). Mice were injected intracranially with 10 PFU MHV suspended in 30 μl sterile saline (2). Control (sham) animals were injected with sterile saline alone. Animals were sacrificed at days 7 and 10 postinfection (p.i.), at which point brains and spinal cords were removed. One-half of each brain was used for plaque assay on the DBT astrocytoma cell line to determine viral burden (2). The remaining half of each brain was used for either RNA isolation, FACS analysis, or ELISA.

Ab preparation and treatment of mice

The generation of rabbit polyclonal antisera specific for mouse IP-10 has previously been described (28). This reagent has previously been shown to be specific for IP-10 and does not cross-react with other known chemokines (28). MHV-infected mice were divided into two groups and treated with either normal rabbit serum (NRS) or anti-IP-10. Mice were injected i.p. with 0.5 ml anti-IP-10 antisera or NRS on days 0, 2, 5, 7, and 9 p.i. and sacrificed at days 7 and 10 p.i.

Confocal microscopy

Primary Abs (diluted in PBS containing 5% normal horse serum) used for dual fluorescent detection of cellular Ags were as follows: rat anti-mouse CD4 (PharMingen, San Diego, CA) at 1:100, rat anti-mouse CD8 (PharMingen) at 1:50, and goat anti-mouse CXCR3 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) at 1:50. For CD4 and CD8 primary Abs, a TRITC-conjugated secondary Ab was used (1:50; Sigma, St. Louis, MO). For CXCR3 primary Ab, a FITC-conjugated secondary Ab was used (1:50; Zymed, South San Francisco, CA). Staining was performed on 8-μm frozen sections fixed in acetone for 10 min at −20°C. Dual-stained slides were then subjected to confocal microscopy using a Bio-Rad MRC UV laser-scanning confocal microscope (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA).

T cell isolation and flow cytometry

Cells were obtained from brains of anti-IP-10- or NRS-treated MHV-infected mice at 7 days p.i. using a previously described protocol (2). FITC-conjugated rat anti-mouse CD4 and CD8 were used to detect infiltrating CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (PharMingen). As a control, an isotype-matched FITC-conjugated Ab was used. Cells were incubated with Abs for 30 min at 4°C, washed, fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde, and analyzed on a FACStar (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA).

Ribonuclease protection assay (RPA)

Total RNA was extracted from the brains of NRS- or anti-IP-10-treated mice at day 7 p.i. using TRIzol reagent (2, 37). Cytokine transcripts were analyzed using a multitemplate probe set (mCK3; PharMingen). RPA analysis was performed using 15 μg of total RNA using a previously described protocol (2, 37).

IFN-γ ELISA

IFN-γ levels were quantified using the Quantikine M mouse IFN-γ immunoassay kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) using brains of mice obtained at day 7 p.i. using previously described protocols (2).

Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed by performing the Mann-Whitney Rank Sum test using Sigma Stat 2.0 software. Values of p ≤ 0.05 were considered significant.

Results and Discussion

To determine the functional significance of IP-10 expression following viral infection of the CNS, mice were infected with a neurotropic strain of MHV, a positive-strand RNA virus. Intracranial infection of mice with MHV results in an acute encephalomyelitis followed by chronic neurologic disease in susceptible strains of mice (40, 41). The acute stage of disease is represented by widespread viral infection of neurons and glial cells, whereas the chronic stage is characterized by viral persistence in astrocytes and oligodendrocytes accompanied by mononuclear cell infiltration and myelin destruction (40, 41). IP-10 is expressed very early (day 1 p.i.) within the CNS following MHV infection and remains the predominant chemokine expressed during the acute phase of disease (37). IP-10 activity was selectively inhibited through i.p. administration of rabbit polyclonal anti-IP-10 antisera. Such treatment led to an increase in mortality with <5% of anti-IP-10-treated mice surviving until day 12 p.i. (Fig. 1⇓). In marked contrast, ∼50% of NRS-treated control mice survived MHV infection (Fig. 1⇓). Correlating with increased mortality was a pronounced decrease in the ability of anti-IP-10-treated mice to clear virus from the CNS as compared with NRS-treated mice. Surviving anti-IP-10-treated mice displayed a 2-log increase in viral titers in the brain as compared with titers present in NRS-treated mice at day 10 p.i. (Table I⇓).

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Increased mortality in anti-IP-10-treated mice. Mice were infected intracranially with 10 PFU MHV and treated i.p. with either anti-IP-10 or NRS. By 12 days p.i., ∼50% of NRS-treated mice survived the infection, whereas <5% of anti-IP-10-treated mice survived. Anti-IP-10, n = 27; NRS, n = 27.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table I.

Delayed viral clearance from the CNS in anti-IP-10-treated mice

Numerous studies have shown that CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are important in clearing MHV from the CNS (2, 42, 43, 44). Therefore, IP-10 expression may be important in host defense by attracting T lymphocytes into the CNS in response to viral infection. In support of this is the demonstration that the majority of infiltrating CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes express the IP-10 receptor, CXCR3. CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes expressing CXCR3 were present within the meninges as well as the parenchyma, indicating these cells were able to migrate into the brain (Fig. 2⇓A). Flow cytometric analysis revealed that anti-IP-10 treatment of MHV-infected mice resulted in a significant decrease (p ≤ 0.001) in both CD4+ (82.3% decrease) and CD8+ (70.4% decrease) infiltration as compared with infected mice treated with NRS (Fig. 2⇓B). Both anti-IP-10- and NRS-treated mice displayed comparable levels of monocyte/macrophage infiltration, suggesting that IP-10 does not attract these cells into the CNS following viral infection (data not shown).

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

A, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells express CXCR3. CXCR3 expression on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells was confirmed using confocal microscopy. Brains were removed from mice at 7 days p.i., and dual fluorescent staining for CXCR3 and CD4 or CD8 Ag was performed. Top row, Representative staining from brains of mice stained for either CXCR3 alone (green cells), CD8 (red cells), or dual-labeled CXCR3/CD8-positive cells (yellow cells). Bottom row, Representative staining from brains of mice stained for either CXCR3 (green cells), CD4 (red cells), or dual-labeled CXCR3/CD4-positive cells (yellow cells). Original magnification, ×40. B, Decreased level of infiltrating T lymphoctyes within the CNS of anti-IP-10-treated mice. Single-cell suspensions were obtained from brains of infected mice at 7 days p.i., and CD4 and CD8 Ag expression was evaluated. Anti-IP-10-treated mice resulted in a 82.3% decrease in infiltrating CD4+ T cells and a 70.4% decrease in infiltrating CD8+ T cells when compared with NRS-treated mice. ∗, p ≤ 0.001. Data presented as mean ± SEM and represents the results of two independent experiments. NRS, n = 5; anti-IP-10, n = 5.

One potential mechanism by which infiltrating T lymphocytes contribute in host defense against MHV infection of the CNS is through the release of the antiviral cytokine IFN-γ (42, 45, 46). To determine whether the decrease in T lymphocyte infiltration observed in anti-IP-10-treated mice correlated with decreased IFN-γ expression, IFN-γ mRNA and protein levels within the brains of anti-IP-10- and NRS-treated mice were determined by RPA and ELISA, respectively. The data shown in Fig. 3⇓A indicates that neutralization of IP-10 resulted in decreased (p ≤ 0.05) mRNA transcripts for IFN-γ as compared with transcript levels present within the brains of NRS-treated mice. Correlating with the decrease in IFN-γ mRNA transcript levels was an ∼80% decrease in IFN-γ protein levels (NRS, 386 ± 56.7 pg/ml, n = 5; anti-IP-10, 72 ± 31 pg/ml, n = 5; p ≤ 0.01) at day 7 as compared with levels found in control mice treated with NRS (Fig. 3⇓B). Although the levels of IFN-γ mRNA transcripts in anti-IP-10-treated mice were slightly higher than would be predicted based on the IFN-γ ELISA data, this is most likely due to mouse-to-mouse variation and sensitivity in the RPA and not the result of IP-10 modulating IFN-γ mRNA translation.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

A, Analysis of IFN-γ mRNA transcripts. IFN-γ mRNA transcript levels were determined by RPA analysis of total RNA obtained from brains of mice at day 7 p.i. Data is presented as normalized units representing the ratio of signal intensity of IFN-γ to internal L32 included in the probe set. Values were obtained from the scanned autoradiograph using NIH Image 1.61 software (2,37 ). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ∗, p ≤ 0.05. NRS, n = 3; anti-IP-10, n = 3. B, Decreased expression of IFN-γ in anti-IP-10-treated mice. IFN-γ protein levels present within the brains of mice at day 7 p.i. were determined by ELISA. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ∗, p ≤ 0.01. NRS, n = 5; anti-IP-10, n = 5.

The data presented in this report have demonstrated that early and prominent expression of IP-10 within the CNS following MHV infection is important in initiating and maintaining a protective Th1 immune response characterized by high-level production of the antiviral cytokine IFN-γ. IP-10 is prominently expressed within the CNS of mice following infection with other viruses such as lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (34) and Theiler’s virus (35, 36). Therefore, based upon the data presented in this manuscript, it is not unreasonable to suggest that IP-10 may play a similar role in host defense by promoting T cell infiltration into the CNS following viral infection. However, no data on the role of IP-10 in host defense within these models or others is available. Similar to IP-10, the non-ELR CXC chemokine Mig (monokine induced by IFN-γ) is induced by IFN-γ and has been shown to exert a chemotactic effect upon T lymphocytes by binding to CXCR3 (6). Studies are currently in progress to evaluate the contributions of Mig to T lymphocyte infiltration into the CNS following MHV infection.

In addition to being expressed during the acute stage of MHV infection, IP-10 is expressed during chronic stages of disease almost exclusively within areas of viral persistence undergoing demyelination (37). A recent study has demonstrated that CD4+ T lymphocytes are essential in driving demyelination in mice persistently infected with MHV (2). Collectively, these observations indicate that early expression of IP-10 is beneficial through attracting Th1 T lymphocytes into the CNS that participate in viral clearance. However, chronic expression of IP-10 may ultimately be detrimental by recruiting CD4+ T cells to sites of MHV persistence, which then contribute to demyelination through the release of additional chemokines such as RANTES (2). Indeed, treatment of MHV-infected mice with anti-RANTES antisera results in a significant decrease in the severity of demyelination by reducing macrophage infiltration (2). The data presented within this study also indicates that targeting IP-10 may offer a unique target for interventional therapies for the treatment of neuroinflammatory disorders in which IP-10 is expressed and considered to contribute to neurologic disease such as multiple sclerosis (47, 48).

Acknowledgments

We thank Matthew Trifilo and Wil Glass for reading the manuscript and helpful discussion.

Footnotes

  • ↵1 This work was supported by National Multiple Sclerosis Society Research Grant RG 30393A1/T and National Institutes of Health Grants NS37336-01 (to T.E.L.), CA39621 (to T.A.H.), and AI25913 and AI43103 (to M.J.B.). M.T.L. and B.P.C. are supported by National Institutes of Health Training Grant T32NS07444.

  • ↵2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Thomas E. Lane, Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, University of California, 3205 Biological Sciences II, Irvine, CA 92697-3900. E-mail address: tlane{at}uci.edu

  • 3 Abbreviations used in this paper: IP-10, IFN-inducible protein 10; NRS, normal rabbit serum; RPA, ribonuclease protection assay; p.i., postinfection; MHV, mouse hepatitis virus.

  • Received May 31, 2000.
  • Accepted June 29, 2000.
  • Copyright © 2000 by The American Association of Immunologists

References

  1. ↵
    Luster, A. D.. 1998. Chemokines—chemotactic cytokines that mediate inflammation. N. Engl. J. Med. 338: 436
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Lane, T. E., M. T. Liu., B. P. Chen, V. C. Asensio, R. M. Samawi, A. D. Paoletti, I. L. Campbell, S. L. Kunkel, H. S. Fox, M. J. Buchmeier. 2000. A central role for CD4+ T cells and RANTES in virus-induced central nervous system inflammation and demyelination. J. Virol. 74: 1415
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Cook, D. N., M. A. Beck, T. M. Coffman, S. L. Kirby, J. F. Sheridan, I. B. Pragnell, O. Smithies. 1995. Requirement of MIP-1α for an inflammatory response to viral infection. Science 269: 1583
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Mahalingam, S., J. M. Farber, G. Karupiah. 1999. The interferon-inducible chemokines MuMig and Crg-2 exhibit antiviral activity in vivo. J. Virol. 73: 1479
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Loetscher, M., B. Gerber, P. Loetscher, S. A. Jones, L. Piali, I. C. Lewis, M. Baggiolini, B. Moser. 1996. Chemokine receptor specific for IP-10 and Mig: structure, function, and expression in activated T-lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 184: 963
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Farber, J. M.. 1997. Mig and IP-10: CXC chemokines that target lymphocytes. J. Leukocyte Biol. 61: 246
    OpenUrlAbstract
  7. ↵
    Piali, L., C. Weber, G. LaRosa, C. R. Mackay, T. A. Springer, I. Clark-Lewis, B. Moser. 1998. The chemokine receptor CXCR3 mediates rapid and shear-resistant adhesion-induction of effector T lymphocytes by the chemokines IP10 and Mig. Eur. J. Immunol. 28: 961
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Biddison, W. E., W.W. Cruikshank, D. M. Center, C. M. Pelfrey, D. D. Taub, R. V. Turner. 1998. CD8+ myelin peptide-specific T cells can chemoattract CD4+ myelin peptide-specific T cells: importance of IFN-inducible protein 10. J. Immunol. 160: 444
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Farber, J. M.. 1990. A macrophage mRNA selectively induced by γ-interferon encodes a member of the platelet factor 4 family of cytokines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87: 5238
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Farber, J. M.. 1992. A collection of mRNA species that are inducible in the RAW264.7 mouse macrophage cell line by γ interferon and other agents. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12: 1535
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Sauty, A., M. Dziejman, R. A. Taha, A. S. Iarossi, K. Neote, E. A. Garcia-Zepeda, Q. Hamid, A. D. Luster. 1999. The T cell-specific CXC chemokines IP-10, Mig, and I-TAC are expressed by activated human bronchial epithelial cells. J. Immunol. 162: 3549
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Cassatella, M. A., S. Gasperini, F. Calzetti, A. Bertagnin, A. D. Luster, P. P. McDonald. 1997. Regulated production of the interferon-γ-inducible protein-10 (IP-10) chemokine by human neutrophils. Eur. J. Immunol. 1: 111
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    Luster, A. D., J. C. Unkeless, J. V. Ravetch. 1985. Gamma-interferon transcriptionally regulates an early-response gene containing homology to platelet proteins. Nature 315: 672
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Luster, A.D., J. V. Ravetch. 1987. Biochemical characterization of a gamma interferon-inducible cytokine (IP-10). J. Exp. Med. 166: 1084
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Gasperini, S., M. Marchi, F. Calzetti, C. Laudanna, L. Vicentini, H. Olsen, M. Murphy, F. Liao, J. Farber, M. A. Cassatella. 1999. Gene expression and production of the monokine induced by IFN-γ (MIG), IFN-inducible T cell α chemoattractant (I-TAC), and IFN-γ-inducible protein-10 (IP-10) chemokines by human neutrophils. J. Immunol. 162: 4928
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Narumi, S., L. M. Wyner, M. H. Stoler, C. S. Tannenbaum, T. A. Hamilton. 1992. Tissue-specific expression of murine IP-10 mRNA following systemic treatment with interferon γ. J. Leukocyte Biol. 52: 27
    OpenUrlAbstract
  17. ↵
    Ohmori, Y., T. A. Hamilton. 1993. Cooperative interaction between interferon (IFN) stimulus response element and κB sequence motifs controls IFNγ- and lipopolysaccharide-stimulated transcription from the murine IP-10 promoter. J. Biol. Chem. 268: 6677
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Ohmori, Y., T. A. Hamilton. 1995. The interferon-stimulated response element and a κB site mediate synergistic induction of murine IP-10 gene transcription by IFN-γ and TNF-α. J. Immunol. 154: 5235
    OpenUrlAbstract
  19. ↵
    Narumi, S., Y. Tominaga, M. Tamaru, S. Shimai, H. Okumura, K. Nishioji, Y. Itoh, T. Okanoue. 1997. Expression of IFN-inducible protein-10 in chronic hepatitis. J. Immunol. 158: 5536
    OpenUrlAbstract
  20. ↵
    Engelhardt, E., A. Toksoy, M. Goebler, S. Debus, E. B. Brocker, R. Gillitzer. 1998. Chemokines IL-8, GRO-α, MCP-1, IP-10, and Mig are sequentially and differentially expressed during phase-specific infiltration of leukocyte subsets in human wound healing. Am. J. Pathol. 153: 1849
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Bradley, L. M., V. C. Asensio, L. K. Schoitz, J. Harbertson, T. Krahl, G. Patstone, N. Woolf, I. L. Campbell, N. Sarvetnick. 1999. Islet-specific Th1, but not Th2, cells secrete multiple chemokines and promote rapid induction of autoimmune diabetes. J. Immunol. 162: 2511
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Shields, P. L., C. M. Morland, M. Salmon, S. Qin, S.G. Hubscher, D. H. Adams. 1999. Chemokine and chemokine receptor interactions provide a mechanism for selective T cell recruitment to specific liver compartments within hepatitis C-infected liver. J. Immunol. 163: 6236
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    Uguccioni, M., P. Gionchetti, D. F. Robbiani, F. Rizzello, S. Peruzzo, M. Campieri, M. Baggiolini. 1999. Increased expression of IP-10, IL-8, MCP-1, and MCP-3 in ulcerative colitis. Am. J. Pathol. 155: 331
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Romagnani, P., C. Beltrame, F. Annunziato, L. Lasagni, M. Luconi, G. Galli, L. Cosmi, E. Maggi, M. Salvadori, C. Pupilli, M. Serio. 1999. Role for interactions between IP-10/Mig and CXCR3 in proliferative glomerulonephiritis. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 10: 2518
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Luster, A. D., R. D. Cardiff, J. A. MacLean, K. Crowe, R. D. Granstein. 1998. Delayed wound healing and disorganized neovascularization in transgenic mice expressing the IP-10 chemokine. Proc. Assoc. Am. Phys. 110: 183
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    Ransohoff, R. M., T. A. Hamilton, M. Tani, M. H. Stoler, H. E. Shick, J. A. Major, M. L. Estes, D. M. Thomas, V. K. Tuohy. 1993. Astrocyte expression of mRNA encoding cytokines IP-10 and JE/MCP-1 in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. FASEB J. 7: 592
    OpenUrlAbstract
  27. ↵
    Glabinski, A. R., M. Tani, R. M. Strieter, V. K. Tuohy, R. M. Ransohoff. 1997. Synchronous synthesis of α and β chemokines by cells of diverse lineage in the central nervous system of mice with relapses of chronic experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Am. J. Pathol. 150: 617
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. ↵
    Tannenbaum, C. S., R. Tubbs, D. Armstrong, J. H. Finke, R. M. Bukowski, T. A. Hamilton. 1998. The CXC chemokines IP-10 and Mig are necessary for IL-12 mediated regression of the mouse RENCA tumor. J. Immunol. 161: 927
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    Keane, M. P., J. A. Belperio, D. A. Arenberg, M. D. Burdick, Z. J. Xu, Y. Y. Xue, R. M. Strieter. 1999. IFN-γ-inducible protein-10 attenuates bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis via inhibition of angiogenesis. J. Immunol. 163: 5686
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    Kolb, S. A., B. Sporer, F. Lahrtz, U. Koedel, H. W. Pfister, A. Fontana. 1999. Identification of a T cell chemotactic factor in the cerebralspinal fluid of HIV-infected individuals as interferon gamma inducible protein 10. J. Neuroimmunol. 93: 172
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    Farber, J. M.. 1998. Chemokines, lymphocytes, and HIV. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 31: 11
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. ↵
    Charles, P. C., X. Chen., M. S. Horwitz, C. F. Brosnan. 1999. Differential chemokine induction by the mouse adenovirus type-1 in the central nervous system of susceptible and resistant strains of mice. J. Neurovirol. 5: 55
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    Cheret, A., R. Le Grand, P. Caufour, O. Neildez, F. Matheux, F. Theodoro, F. Boussin, B. Vaslin, D. Dormont. 1997. Chemoattractant factors (IP-10, MIP-1α, IL-16) mRNA expression in mononuclear cells from different tissues during acute SIVmac251 infection of macaques. J. Med. Primatol. 26: 19
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    Asensio, V. C., I. L. Campbell. 1997. Chemokine gene expression in the brains of mice with lymphocytic choriomeningitis. J. Virol. 71: 7832
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    Hoffman, L. M., B. T. Fife, W. S. Begolka, S. D. Miller, W. J. Karpus. 1999. Central nervous system chemokine expression during Theiler’s virus-induced demyelinating disease. J. Neurovirol. 5: 635
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    Theil, D. J., I. Tsunoda., J. E. Libbey, T. J. Derfuss, R. S. Fujinami. 2000. Alterations in cytokine but not chemokine mRNA expression during three distinct Theiler’s virus infections. J. Neuroimmunol. 104: 22
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    Lane, T. E., V. C. Asensio, N. Yu, A. D. Paoletti, I. L. Campbell, M. J. Buchmeier. 1998. Dynamic regulation of α and β chemokine expression in the central nervous system during mouse hepatitis virus-induced demyelinating disease. J. Immunol. 160: 970
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    Asensio, V. C., C. Kincaid, I. L. Campbell. 1999. Chemokines and the inflammatory response to viral infection in the central nervous system with a focus on lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus. J. Neurovirol. 5: 65
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    Dalziel, R. G., P. W. Lampert, M. J. Buchmeier. 1986. Site-specific alteration of murine hepatitis virus type 4 peplomer glycoprotein E2 results in reduced neurovirulence. J. Virol. 59: 463
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    Houtman, J. J., J. O. Fleming. 1996. Pathogenesis of mouse hepatitis virus-induced demyelination. J. Neurovirol. 2: 361
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    Buchmeier, M. J., T. E. Lane. 1999. Viral-induced neurodegenerative disease. Curr. Opin. Micro. 2: 398
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  42. ↵
    Pearce, B. D., M. V. Hobbs, T. S. McGraw, M. J. Buchmeier. 1994. Cytokine induction during T-cell-mediated clearance of mouse hepatitis virus from neurons in vivo. J. Virol. 68: 5483
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    Williamson, J. S. P., S. A. Stohlman. 1990. Effective clearance of mouse hepatitis virus from the central nervous system requires both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. J. Virol. 64: 4589
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    Yamaguchi, K., N. Goto, S. Kyuwa, M. Hayami, Y. Toyoda. 1991. Protection of mice from a lethal coronavirus infection in the central nervous system by adoptive transfer of virus-specific T cell clones. J. Neuroimmunol. 32: 1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    Lane, T. E., A. D. Paoletti, M. J. Buchmeier. 1997. Disassociation between the in vitro and in vivo effects of nitric oxide on a neurotropic murine coronavirus. J. Virol. 71: 2202
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    Parra, B., D. R. Hinton, N. W. Marten, C. C. Bergmann, M. T. Lin, C. S. Yang, S. A. Stohlman. 1999. IFN-γ is required for viral clearance from central nervous system oligodendroglia. J. Immunol. 162: 1641
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    Sorensen, T., M. Tani, J. Jensen, V. Pierce, C. Lucchinetti, V. A. Folcik, S. Qin, J. Rottman, F. Sellebjerg, R. M. Strieter, J. L. Frederiksen, R. M. Ransohoff. 1999. Expression of specific chemokines and chemokine receptors in the central nervous system of multiple sclerosis patients. J. Clin. Invest. 103: 807
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    Balashov, K. E., J. B. Rottman, H. L. Weiner, W. W. Hancock. 1999. CCR5+ and CXCR3+ T cells are increased in multiple sclerosis and their ligands MIP-1α and IP-10 are expressed in demyelinating brain lesions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 6873
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 165 (5)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 165, Issue 5
1 Sep 2000
  • Table of Contents
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cutting Edge: The T Cell Chemoattractant IFN-Inducible Protein 10 Is Essential in Host Defense Against Viral-Induced Neurologic Disease
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Cutting Edge: The T Cell Chemoattractant IFN-Inducible Protein 10 Is Essential in Host Defense Against Viral-Induced Neurologic Disease
Michael T. Liu, Benjamin P. Chen, Patricia Oertel, Michael J. Buchmeier, David Armstrong, Thomas A. Hamilton, Thomas E. Lane
The Journal of Immunology September 1, 2000, 165 (5) 2327-2330; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.5.2327

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Cutting Edge: The T Cell Chemoattractant IFN-Inducible Protein 10 Is Essential in Host Defense Against Viral-Induced Neurologic Disease
Michael T. Liu, Benjamin P. Chen, Patricia Oertel, Michael J. Buchmeier, David Armstrong, Thomas A. Hamilton, Thomas E. Lane
The Journal of Immunology September 1, 2000, 165 (5) 2327-2330; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.5.2327
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results and Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Cutting Edge: Hypoxia-Induced Ubc9 Promoter Hypermethylation Regulates IL-17 Expression in Ulcerative Colitis
  • Cutting Edge: Mouse SARS-CoV-2 Epitope Reveals Infection and Vaccine-Elicited CD8 T Cell Responses
  • Cutting Edge: Heterogeneity in Cell Age Contributes to Functional Diversity of NK Cells
Show more Cutting Edge

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Public Access
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606