Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Antagonism of Direct Alloreactivity of an HLA-B27-Specific CTL Clone by Altered Peptide Ligands of Its Natural Epitope

Marina García-Peydró, Alberto Paradela, Juan P. Albar and José A. López de Castro
J Immunol November 15, 2000, 165 (10) 5680-5685; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.165.10.5680
Marina García-Peydró
*Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias, Cantoblanco, Madrid, Spain; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alberto Paradela
*Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias, Cantoblanco, Madrid, Spain; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juan P. Albar
†Immunology and Oncology Department, Pharmacia-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología, Cantoblanco, Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
José A. López de Castro
*Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias, Cantoblanco, Madrid, Spain; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Antagonism of allospecific CTL by altered MHC ligands is a potential approach to specific immunomodulation of allogeneic T cell responses in acute graft rejection and graft-vs-host disease. In this study we have analyzed the capacity of peptide analogs of a natural HLA-B27-allospecific CTL epitope to antagonize direct alloreactivity. Alanine scanning demonstrated that positions 4, 5, and 7 of the peptide epitope were critical for allorecognition. A number of relatively conservative substitutions at each of these positions were then tested for their effect on allorecognition and antagonism. All substitutions at position 5 abrogated cytotoxicity. In contrast, a few changes at positions 4 and 7 were tolerated, indicating a limited flexibility of the allospecific CTL in recognition of peptide epitope variants. Most of the substitutions impairing cytotoxicity actually induced antagonism. However, whereas epitope variants with changes at positions 4 and 7 behaved as weak or intermediate antagonists, some of the variants with changes at position 5 antagonized CTL alloreactivity almost completely. The results in this study demonstrate for the first time that antagonism of direct class I-mediated alloreactivity can be achieved by variants of a natural allospecific peptide epitope.

CD8+ T cells recognize, via their TCR, antigenic peptides bound to MHC class I molecules on the cell surface. This interaction is highly specific, as subtle changes in the structure of the peptide epitope or the MHC molecule can affect CTL recognition, but endowed with some flexibility (1, 2). Thus, single amino acid substitutions of TCR contact residues in the peptide epitope can generate agonists that are still recognized by the specific CTL. In addition, altered peptide ligands can also act either as partial agonists, eliciting only a subset of CTL effector functions (3, 4, 5), or as antagonists, which are recognized by CTL but inhibit their effector response to the antigenic peptide. Indeed, naturally occurring variants of viral epitopes, or epitopes from other intracellular parasites, can antagonize the corresponding CTL responses in vitro (6, 7, 8, 9). Antagonists can also be generated by modifications of haptens covalently attached to peptide side chains (10) or by N-hydroxylation of the peptidic main chain (11).

The mechanism involved in TCR antagonism remains obscure, and diverse models have been proposed to explain this effect. The kinetic model (12) suggests that a lower time of occupancy of the TCR by the antagonist/MHC complex is crucial. Antagonists may show faster TCR dissociation rates (13) or lower affinity (14), but antagonists with higher affinity for the TCR have also been described (15), which might challenge this hypothesis. Structural models propose that antagonists prevent conformational change in the TCR that would be necessary for intracellular signaling. The similar structure of the same TCR complexed with either an agonist or an antagonist (16) disfavors this possibility. Alternatively, antagonists could prevent formation of supramolecular structures, as observed in class II-restricted systems (17, 18). Finally, the antagonist/MHC complex might compete with the agonist/MHC complex for TCR binding, inhibiting the formation of signal-inducing agonist/MHC/TCR complexes and engaging the TCR in unproductive interactions (10). An important question is whether TCR interaction with an antagonist peptide generates a dominant-negative signal that prevents cell responsiveness. Two recent reports concerning class I-restricted Ags (19, 20) have demonstrated that exposure of a TCR to a specific antagonist does not inhibit a second independent TCR, expressed on the same T cell, from eliciting a cellular response upon recognizing its antigenic peptide. However, the opposite finding has been reported for class II-restricted T cells (21, 22).

The ability of self-restricted CTL to cross-react with peptide epitope variants containing single amino acid substitutions has been extensively explored (4, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27), and numerous antagonists have been reported for this type of CTL (4, 6, 7, 8, 15, 28, 29). In contrast, equivalent studies in alloreactivity are hampered by the difficulty of identifying the peptides specifically recognized by alloreactive T cell clones (30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36). To circumvent this problem, a recent study used peptide libraries to obtain class II-restricted alloreactive T cell antagonists without knowledge of the natural epitope (37). To our knowledge, only one recent study (38) has reported antagonism of direct alloreactivity for a class I-specific CTL clone by analogs of an allorestricted peptide. The identity of this peptide with the endogenously processed natural allospecific epitope was not established.

Studies on alloreactive CTL antagonism are of great potential importance in exploring the possibilities to antagonize CTL responses mediating acute allograft rejection and graft-vs-host disease (GVHD)3 in vivo. A basis for such hope is that, despite the diversity of alloreactive CTL, it is known that allospecific T cell populations infiltrating human allografts that are being rejected show a highly restricted clonality (39, 40, 41). Selective clonal expansions of alloreactive CTL also occur during GVHD (42, 43). Thus, it is conceivable that antagonists of immunodominant epitopes in these harmful responses might effectively modulate acute graft rejection and GVHD. A prerequisite for a rational design of such antagonists is to identify peptide epitopes involved in alloreactivity, and to test the capacity of altered epitope ligands to induce antagonism of specific allo-CTL.

We have previously identified the RRFFPYYV octamer as the natural ligand recognized by the HLA-B27-allospecific CTL clone 27S69 (36). This provided the opportunity to test the capacity of analogs of a natural allospecific epitope to antagonize direct alloreactivity, and to identify the structural features of such antagonists. For this purpose, those residues of the natural peptide epitope that were critical for specific T cell recognition were first identified. Then, the effect of relatively conservative substitutions at these positions on CTL allorecognition and antagonism was analyzed.

Materials and Methods

CTL 27S69

This alloreactive CTL clone was raised against B*2705. Its culture conditions and fine specificity with other HLA-B27 subtypes have been described (44).

HLA-B27 transfectant cell lines

HMy2.C1R (C1R) is a human lymphoid cell line with low expression of its endogenous class I Ags. B*2705-C1R transfectant cells were cultured in DMEM (Life Technologies, Paisley, U.K.) with 5% heat-inactivated FCS. T2 is a TAP-deficient human cell line of lymphoid origin (45). The B*2705-T2 transfectant was a gift from Dr. David Yu (University of California, Los Angeles, CA). It was cultured in DMEM supplemented with 5% FCS. RMA-S is a TAP-deficient murine cell line (46). B*2705-RMA-S transfectant cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FCS. When cultured at 26°C, T2 and RMA-S transfectants express class I molecules presumably devoid of peptides or bound to low affinity ligands (47). These molecules are unstable at 37°C, but their surface expression at this temperature can be stabilized by exogenous peptide ligands.

Peptide synthesis and purification

The natural B*2705 ligands RRFFPYYV (36), RRYQKSTEL, and FRYNGLIHR (48), and a set of analogs of the former peptide carrying single amino acid substitutions at residues 1, 4, 5, or 7, were used in this study. Peptide variants were designated with the one-letter code of the amino acid introduced followed by the number of the position changed. All peptides were synthesized using standard fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl chemistry and purified by HPLC. Their correct composition and molecular mass were confirmed by amino acid analysis using a 6300 amino acid analyzer (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA), which also allowed their quantification, and by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight (MALDI-TOF) and electrospray ion/trap mass spectrometry (MS).

Epitope stabilization assay

The quantitative procedure used has been described (49). Briefly, B*2705-RMA-S transfectant cells were incubated at 26°C for 24 h. Then, the synthetic peptide was added at 10−4 to 10−9 M. Cells were incubated for 1 h at 26°C, then at 37°C, and collected for flow microcytometry analysis after 2 h. Binding of the natural RRFFPYYV octamer was quantitated as the molar concentration of this peptide at 50% of the maximum fluorescence obtained. Binding efficiency of the peptide variants was measured as the molar concentration of these peptides required to obtain half-maximal fluorescence of the RRFFPYYV octamer (EC50). Values of EC50 ≤ 10 μM were considered to reflect high affinity. EC50 values between 10 and 50 μM were considered as intermediate affinity, EC50 > 50 μM indicated low affinity.

Cytotoxicity assays

In assays to test peptide analogs of the CTL 27S69 epitope for agonist activity, B*2705-T2 targets were preincubated in the absence of peptide for 18–20 h at 26°C, 51Cr-labeled, and incubated for 30 min at room temperature with synthetic peptides in RPMI 1640 medium (Life Technologies) with 1% FCS. Effector cells were then added, and incubation at 37°C was conducted for 5 h in the continuous presence of peptide. The procedures have been described in detail elsewhere (36). Recognition of the natural epitope of CTL 27S69 was quantitated as the peptide concentration required to obtain half of the maximum lysis observed with this peptide in the concentration range used. Recognition of epitope variants was measured as the peptide concentration required to obtain half-maximal lysis of the octamer epitope (LC50).

In experiments to determine whether peptide epitope variants were antagonists, peptides were added to 51Cr-labeled B*2705-C1R targets, which constitutively express the natural epitope, and incubated for 30 min at room temperature in RPMI 1640 medium (Life Technologies) with 1% FCS. Effector cells were then added and incubation at 37°C was conducted for 4 h in the continuous presence of peptide. Antagonist activity was calculated as percent inhibition of lysis relative to the specific lysis of the B*2705-C1R targets without adding exogenous peptide.

In addition, the following classical TCR antagonism assay was performed. 51Cr-labeled B*2705-T2 targets were prepulsed with a low dose (10−8 M) of the RRFFPYYV epitope in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 2% FCS for 20 min at room temperature. Cells were washed twice and then pulsed with various amounts of the octamer analogs in the same conditions. Finally, effector cells were added and incubation was conducted for 4 h. Antagonist activity was calculated as percent inhibition of lysis relative to the specific lysis of the B*2705-T2 targets prepulsed only with the octamer epitope.

Results

Identification of epitope residues critical for recognition by CTL 27S69

Molecular modeling of the B*2705/RRFFPYYV complex (36) predicted that Arg1, Phe4, Pro5, and Tyr7 of the octamer epitope were potentially accessible to the TCR. To assess their contribution to CTL allorecognition, analogs of the octamer with Ala substitutions at these positions were used to sensitize B*2705-T2 targets for lysis by CTL 27S69 (Fig. 1⇓A). The only replacement tolerated by this clone was the change at position 1, whereas all other Ala analogs completely abrogated recognition. Efficient binding (EC50, 4–15 μM) of all Ala analogs to B*2705 in an epitope stabilization assay (Fig. 1⇓B) indicated that lack of recognition of A4, A5, and A7 was not due to inability to bind B*2705 at the cell surface. These results indicate that recognition of the RRFFPYYV epitope by CTL 27S69 critically depends on the Phe4, Pro5, and Tyr7 side chains, but not on Arg1.

           FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

A, Lysis of B*2705-T2 transfectant cells sensitized with the natural RRFFPYYV octamer epitope or monosubstituted Ala variants by CTL 27S69. The natural B*2705 ligand RRYQKSTEL was used as negative control. LC50 values (the peptide concentration required to obtain half-maximal lysis of the octamer epitope) for RRFFPYYV and ARRFFPYYV are indicated. Other analogs were not recognized (n.r.) in this assay. The E:T ratio used was 2.5:1. Data are means of three independent experiments. B, Epitope stabilization assay showing binding of Ala-monosubstituted RRFFPYYV analogs to HLA-B*2705 on RMA-S transfectant cells. EC50 values (see Materials and Methods) are indicated. Data are means of two experiments.

CTL 27S69 recognizes epitope variants substituted at positions 4 and 7, but not 5

To further investigate the molecular interactions of the 27S69 TCR with Phe4, Pro5, and Tyr7 of the octamer epitope, a panel of peptide variants carrying relatively conservative substitutions (in size and/or polarity) at these three positions were synthesized. As shown in Table I⇓, none of these substitutions significantly affected peptide binding to B*2705 (EC50, 2–9 μM). The ability of CTL 27S69 to recognize these analogs was tested in peptide sensitization assays using B*2705-T2 target cells (Fig. 2⇓ and Table I⇓). Among the substitutions at position 4 (Fig. 2⇓A), the change of Phe to Tyr decreased recognition by CTL 27S69 only about 10-fold relative to the natural epitope. Other peptide variants substituted at this position were recognized much less efficiently; recognition of W4 was reduced about 104-fold, L4 and V4 about 106 to 107-fold, and I4 was not recognized. In addition, all the substitutions of Pro5 tested (Fig. 2⇓B) abolished allorecognition. Among analogs substituted at position 7 (Fig. 2⇓C), recognition of H7 and L7 was reduced only about 20-fold, recognition of F7 about 300-fold, and the remaining substitutions were either marginally (W7 and V7) or not recognized (T7).

           FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Cytotoxicity of CTL 27S69 against B*2705-T2 targets incubated with RRFF PYYV and analogs of this peptide with single amino acid changes at positions 4 (A), 5 (B), or 7 (C). Data are means of three experiments.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table I.

Effect of substitutions at residues 4, 5, and 7 of the RRFFPYYV epitope on recognition by CTL 27S69 and B*2705 binding

These results indicate that none of the RRFFPYYV variants tested can fully mimic the CTL 27S69 epitope. However, efficient recognition of Y4, H7, and L7 revealed a limited flexibility of this epitope at positions 4 and 7. In contrast, CTL 27S69 exhibited an apparently exquisite specificity for Pro5.

RRFFPYYV analogs can antagonize recognition of this epitope by CTL 27S69

We next examined whether peptide epitope variants could act as antagonists of CTL 27S69 by testing their ability to inhibit lysis of B*2705-C1R target cells, which express the endogenous epitope (Fig. 3⇓ and Table II⇓). Four analogs containing substitutions of Phe4 that were poorly (L4, V4) or not recognized (A4, I4) by CTL 27S69 were tested in this assay (Fig. 3⇓A). Significantly reduced lysis (>50% inhibition) was obtained with A4 and V4. While A4 inhibited lysis in a dose-dependent manner, maximal inhibition by V4 was observed at intermediate concentrations and progressively declined at higher ones. L4 behaved as a weak antagonist (about 30% maximal inhibition), and I4 failed to antagonize lysis at any concentration tested. All four variants substituted at position 5 (A5, I5, L5, V5) inhibited CTL 27S69-mediated lysis in a dose-dependent manner by >50% (Fig. 3⇓B). L5 and I5 were the most powerful antagonists because they almost completely abolished recognition at the highest concentration used. V5 and A5 inhibited lysis up to ∼60%. Finally, the three epitope variants carrying substitutions of Tyr7 (A7, T7, and V7) showed various degrees of dose-dependent inhibition of lysis ranging from ∼30% (T7) to 65% (V7) maximal inhibition. The possibility that the decreased lysis observed with most analogs was due to displacement of the endogenous B*2705-bound RRFFPYYV epitope was excluded, as no significant inhibition was induced by an unrelated ligand, FRYNGLIHR, whose binding affinity to B*2705 (EC50, 4 μM) (49) is similar to those of the epitope variants, or by I4, which was also used as an internal control in these experiments. In addition, antagonism of V4 at intermediate, but not higher, concentrations (Fig. 3⇓A) further excludes this possibility. The pattern shown by V4 has also been observed with other CTL antagonists (4).

           FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Inhibition of CTL 27S69-mediated lysis of B*2705-C1R target cells by RRFFPYYV epitope variants with single substitutions at residues 4 (A), 5 (B), and 7 (C). The B*2705 natural ligand FRYNGLIHR was used as negative control. Cells were preincubated with various amounts of the octamer analogs as described in Materials and Methods. Specific lysis of B*2705-C1R targets in the absence of exogenous peptide variants, at the E:T ratio used (0.8:1), was 52%. Data are means of three to five experiments.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table II.

Inhibition of CTL 27S69-mediated lysis of B*2705-C1R target cells by RRFFPYYV epitope variants

These data demonstrate that multiple substitutions in the allospecific RRFFPYYV epitope that largely decrease or abrogate recognition by CTL 27S69 induce antagonism of this CTL clone.

Allospecific epitope variants are not “superantagonists”

Because the previous antagonism assays involved endogenously presented alloantigen, they did not allow us to estimate the concentration of octamer variants, relative to the natural epitope, required to inhibit recognition by CTL 27S69. Thus, the inhibitory effect of the most powerful antagonists, I5 and L5, was tested on B*2705-T2 targets prepulsed with a suboptimal concentration of the RRFFPYYV epitope (Fig. 4⇓). I5 and L5 significantly inhibited lysis only at 1000-fold or higher molar excess over the octamer, and almost completely abrogated recognition at the maximal antagonist/agonist ratio tested. These results confirm the antagonist function of the two altered epitope ligands and further indicate that a large excess over the natural allospecific peptide is required. Therefore, I5 and L5 do not behave as the “superantagonists” reported in some self-restricted responses (6, 7), which are able to inhibit CTL effector function at amounts well below that of the natural epitope.

           FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

Inhibitory effect of octamer analogs on recognition of B*2705-T2 targets prepulsed with the natural epitope by CTL 27S69. Cells were first incubated with 10−8 M of RRFFPYYV, washed, and then pulsed with various amounts of the I5 or L5 epitope variants (see Materials and Methods). The B*2705 natural ligand FRYNGLIHR and the I4 analog were used as negative controls. Specific lysis of target cells incubated only with the octamer, at the E:T ratio used (2:1), was 48%. Data are means of three independent experiments. Percent maximal inhibition of lysis ± SD is indicated for each peptide.

Discussion

A rational design of peptidic or nonpeptidic antagonists of alloreactive CTL requires sufficient knowledge about the role of peptide residues in allospecific T cell recognition and the flexibility of alloreactive CTL in the recognition of epitope variants. Numerous studies have addressed these issues for self-restricted CTL. However, similar studies in alloreactivity are hampered by the few natural class I MHC ligands known to be allospecific peptide epitopes (30, 31, 32, 34, 35, 36) and the great difficulties of identifying them.

It is by no means obvious that the role of peptide residues in T cell recognition or antagonism is the same in self-restriction and alloreactivity. Lack of selection against allo-MHC molecules during thymic development raises the possibility that a more significant role of MHC residues in alloreactivity may limit the capacity of allospecific T-cells to discriminate among subtle peptide changes. This has actually been reported for a class II-specific T cell clone, for which recognition of two residues of its allospecific epitope was much more degenerate than for a self-restricted peptide also recognized by the same T cell (50). However, it has also been reported that self-restricted and alloreactive T cell clones are comparably dependent on their interaction with MHC class I residues (51), suggesting that self-restricted and allospecific T cell epitopes may have similar structural features.

Knowledge of a natural ligand of HLA-B27 that is an allospecific T cell epitope allowed us to analyze the flexibility of a class I-directed alloreactive CTL clone in the recognition of peptide epitope variants and their capacity to act as antagonists. The results in this study indicate that CTL 27S69 behaves similarly to self-restricted CTL in 1) the critical involvement of nonanchor peptide positions in the allospecific epitope, and 2) the limited flexibility of this CTL clone for recognizing epitope variants with changes at these positions. That removal of Pro5 always abrogated lysis suggests that this is the most critical residue of the allospecific peptide epitope. This may be for its implication in direct contacts with the TCR, for its role in maintaining the conformation of the epitope, or both. A critical conformational role of Pro5 is likely because this residue imposes stronger stereochemical constraints than any other amino acid due to its rigid structure and unique ability to form stable cis peptide bonds. Phe4 was the second most restricted residue, as only the conservative Tyr4 was largely tolerated. A somewhat larger permissiveness of CTL 27S69 for changes at position 7 was suggested by the significant cross-reaction with the H7, L7, and F7 analogs.

The possibility of modulating alloreactive T cell responses through the use of antagonists depends, in the very first place, on the ease with which alterations of allospecific peptide epitopes lead to antagonism. For self class I-restricted CTL, an extensive study (4) demonstrated that as many as 40% of 64 peptide epitope variants with changes at individual TCR contact positions behaved as antagonists for three CTL clones specific for the same peptide. Significantly, changes in some positions led to antagonism much more easily than in others. For instance, 13 of 16 variants in position 4 of the peptide epitope in that study were antagonists. The relative ease with which antagonist of self-restricted CTL can be generated explains that antagonism is used as a mechanism of subversion of CTL responses by viruses or other intracellular pathogens through mutation of relevant epitopes (6, 7, 8, 9, 28).

That peptide antagonism was more readily detected in recognition of syngeneic than allogeneic peptide-MHC complexes by a clonal CTL line showing such double specificity (15) raised the possibility that allo- and self-restricted CTL recognition might differ in their susceptibility to antagonism. This view could be consistent with reported observations that TCR affinity tends to be higher for allogeneic than syngeneic peptide-MHC complexes (52, 53) and also with the view that contribution of the peptide, relative to the MHC molecule to the binding energy of TCR-peptide-MHC interactions, may be lower in alloreactivity than in self-restricted recognition (54).

Aside from this study, to our knowledge only one very recent report has described antagonism of the direct alloreactivity of class I-directed CTL by analogs of its allospecific epitope (38). In this previous study, only 8 of 61 (16%) epitope variants substituted at any of three putative TCR contact residues showed >50% antagonism of the CTL activity. This is a significantly lower number of antagonists than reported for self-restricted CTL (4). In contrast, our results showed that 7 of 11 peptide epitope variants (64%) antagonized CTL alloreactivity by >50%. This substantially higher percentage might be simply due to the fact that we have restricted our screening of potential antagonists to relatively conservative substitutions rather than performed a systematic screening of amino acid changes at each position. However, an additional difference that might be relevant to antagonism by altered peptide ligands is that, in contrast to our case, the allospecific epitope in that study (38) was derived by homology with a cross-reactive viral epitope and matching with human proteins (25), and therefore was not necessarily the natural endogenous ligand recognized by the allospecific CTL.

In two important aspects our results are coincident with those of Burrows et al. (38) and with analogous studies on self-restricted CTL (21). First, it is possible to obtain very potent clonal antagonists (>80% antagonistic activity: I5, L5) of alloreactive CTL by peptide epitope ligands altered at positions involved in TCR contact. Second, changes in one of these positions led to strong antagonism (>50%) much more frequently (in our case, with 4 of 4 changes at position 5). Therefore, it can be concluded that class I-directed CTL alloreactivity can be inhibited by antagonistic peptide epitope variants, just as self-restricted CTL, and that, with some antagonists, this inhibition can be virtually complete for individual CTL clones. Although some peptide antagonists in antiviral T cell responses have been reported that inhibit CTL recognition at molar equivalence or even at 1000-fold lower concentration than the natural peptide epitope (6, 7), a high molar excess of the antagonists is more frequently required to antagonize T cells, as found in our study.

These conclusions raise hopes about the potential use of alloreactive CTL antagonists in the modulation of allogeneic responses in vivo because 1) the restricted clonal heterogeneity often observed in allograft infiltrates and GVHD (39, 40, 41, 42, 43) might help to overcome the problem of clonal diversity in alloreactivity; and 2) the relative ease with which certain structural alterations of the allospecific peptide epitope led to antagonism suggests the feasibility of designing nonnatural MHC ligands (11, 55, 56) with enhanced biostability for immunomodulation of alloreactive responses in vivo.

Acknowledgments

We thank Jesus Vazquez and Samuel Ogueta (Protein Chemistry Laboratory, Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa) for their help in mass spectrometry, Francisco Gavilanes (Universidad Complutense de Madrid) for help in amino acid analyses, and David Yu (University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA) for the B*2705-T2 cell line.

Footnotes

  • ↵1 This work was supported by Grants SAF97/0182 and SAF99/0055 from the Plan Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo and Grant 08.3/0022/1998 from the Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid. We thank the Fundación Ramón Areces for an institutional grant to the Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa.

  • ↵2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. José A. López de Castro, Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias, Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain. E-mail address: aldecastro{at}cbm.uam.es

  • ↵3 Abbreviations used in this paper: GVHD, graft-vs-host disease; C1R, HMy2.C1R.

  • Received December 20, 1999.
  • Accepted August 24, 2000.
  • Copyright © 2000 by The American Association of Immunologists

References

  1. ↵
    Kersh, G. J., P. M. Allen. 1996. Essential flexibility in the T cell recognition of antigen. Nature 380: 495
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Sloan-Lancaster, J., P. M. Allen. 1996. Altered peptide ligand-induced partial T cell activation: molecular mechanisms and role in T cell biology. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 14: 1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Evavold, B. D., P. M. Allen. 1991. Separation of IL-4 production from Th cell proliferation by an altered T cell receptor ligand. Science 252: 1308
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Jameson, S. C., F. R. Carbone, M. J. Bevan. 1993. Clone-specific T cell receptor antagonists of major histocompatibility complex class I-restricted cytotoxic T cells. J. Exp. Med. 177: 1541
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Jameson, S. C., M. J. Bevan. 1995. T cell receptor antagonists and partial agonists. Immunity 2: 1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Klenerman, P., S. Rowland Jones, S. McAdam, J. Edwards, S. Daenke, D. Lalloo, B. Koppe, W. Rosenberg, D. Boyd, A. Edwards, et al 1994. Cytotoxic T-cell activity antagonized by naturally occurring HIV-1 Gag variants. Nature 369: 403
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Bertoletti, A., A. Sette, F. V. Chisari, A. Penna, M. Levrero, M. De Carli, F. Fiaccadori, C. Ferrari. 1994. Natural variants of cytotoxic epitopes are T-cell receptor antagonists for antiviral cytotoxic T cells. Nature 369: 407
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Sewell, A. K., G. C. Harcourt, P. J. Goulder, D. A. Price, R. E. Phillips. 1997. Antagonism of cytotoxic T lymphocyte-mediated lysis by natural HIV-1 altered peptide ligands requires simultaneous presentation of agonist and antagonist peptides. Eur. J. Immunol. 27: 2323
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Gilbert, S. C., M. Plebanski, S. Gupta, J. Morris, M. Cox, M. Aidoo, D. Kwiatkowski, B. M. Greenwood, H. C. Whittle, A. V. Hill. 1998. Association of malaria parasite population structure, HLA, and immunological antagonism. Science 279: 1173
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Preckel, T., R. Grimm, S. Martin, H. U. Weltzien. 1997. Altered hapten ligands antagonize trinitrophenyl-specific cytotoxic T cells and block internalization of hapten-specific receptors. J. Exp. Med. 185: 1803
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Hin, S., C. Zabel, A. Bianco, G. Jung, P. Walden. 1999. Cutting edge: N-hydroxy peptides: a new class of TCR antagonists. J. Immunol. 163: 2363
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Rabinowitz, J. D., C. Beeson, D. S. Lyons, M. M. Davis, H. M. McConnell. 1996. Kinetic discrimination in T-cell activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 1401
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Kersh, G. J., E. N. Kersh, D. H. Fremont, P. M. Allen. 1998. High- and low-potency ligands with similar affinities for the TCR: the importance of kinetics in TCR signaling. Immunity. 9: 817
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Alam, S. M., P. J. Travers, J. L. Wung, W. Nasholds, S. Redpath, S. C. Jameson, N. R. Gascoigne. 1996. T cell receptor affinity and thymocyte positive selection. Nature 381: 616
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Sykulev, Y., Y. Vugmeyster, A. Brunmark, H. L. Ploegh, H. N. Eisen. 1998. Peptide antagonism and T cell receptor interactions with peptide-MHC complexes. Immunity. 9: 475
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Ding, Y. H., B. M. Baker, D. N. Garboczi, W. E. Biddison, D. C. Wiley. 1999. Four A6-TCR/peptide/HLA-A2 structures that generate very different T cell signals are nearly identical. Immunity 11: 45
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Monks, C. R., B. A. Freiberg, H. Kupfer, N. Sciaky, A. Kupfer. 1998. Three-dimensional segregation of supramolecular activation clusters in T cells. Nature 395: 82
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Grakoui, A., S. K. Bromley, C. Sumen, M. M. Davis, A. S. Shaw, P. M. Allen, M. L. Dustin. 1999. The immunological synapse: a molecular machine controlling T cell activation. Science 285: 221
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Daniels, M. A., S. L. Schober, K. A. Hogquist, S. C. Jameson. 1999. Cutting edge: a test of the dominant negative signal model for TCR antagonism. J. Immunol. 162: 3761
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Stotz, S. H., L. Bolliger, F. R. Carbone, E. Palmer. 1999. T cell receptor (TCR) antagonism without a negative signal: evidence from T cell hybridomas expressing two independent TCRs. J. Exp. Med. 189: 253
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Robertson, J. M., B. D. Evavold. 1999. Cutting edge: dueling TCRs: peptide antagonism of CD4+ T cells with dual antigen specificities. J. Immunol. 163: 1750
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Dittel, B. N., I. Stefanova, R. N. Germain, C. A. J. Janeway. 1999. Cross-antagonism of a T cell clone expressing two distinct T cell receptors. Immunity 11: 289
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Chen, W., J. McCluskey, S. Rodda, F. R. Carbone. 1993. Changes at peptide residues buried in the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I binding cleft influence T cell recognition: a possible role for indirect conformational alterations in the MHC class I or bound peptide in determining T cell recognition. J. Exp. Med. 177: 869
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Dressel, A., J. L. Chin, A. Sette, R. Gausling, P. Hollsberg, D. A. Hafler. 1997. Autoantigen recognition by human CD8 T cell clones: enhanced agonist response induced by altered peptide ligands. J. Immunol. 159: 4943
    OpenUrlAbstract
  25. ↵
    Burrows, S. R., S. L. Silins, R. Khanna, J. M. Burrows, M. Rischmueller, J. McCluskey, D. J. Moss. 1997. Cross-reactive memory T cells for Epstein-Barr virus augment the alloresponse to common human leukocyte antigens: degenerate recognition of major histocompatibility complex-bound peptide by T cells and its role in alloreactivity. Eur. J. Immunol. 27: 1726
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Ono, T., T. P. DiLorenzo, F. Wang, A. M. Kalergis, S. G. Nathenson. 1998. Alterations in TCR-MHC contacts subsequent to cross-recognition of class I MHC and singly substituted peptide variants. J. Immunol. 161: 5454
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Hausmann, S., W. E. Biddison, K. J. Smith, Y. H. Ding, D. N. Garboczi, U. Utz, D. C. Wiley, K. W. Wucherpfennig. 1999. Peptide recognition by two HLA-A2/Tax11–19-specific T cell clones in relationship to their MHC/peptide/TCR crystal structures. J. Immunol. 162: 5389
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Dong, T., D. Boyd, W. Rosenberg, N. Alp, M. Takiguchi, A. McMichael, S. Rowland-Jones. 1996. An HLA-B35-restricted epitope modified at an anchor residue results in an antagonist peptide. Eur. J. Immunol. 26: 335
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Kessler, B. M., P. Bassanini, J. C. Cerottini, I. F. Luescher. 1997. Effects of epitope modification on T cell receptor-ligand binding and antigen recognition by seven H-2Kd-restricted cytotoxic T lymphocyte clones specific for a photoreactive peptide derivative. J. Exp. Med. 185: 629
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    Udaka, K., T. J. Tsomides, H. N. Eisen. 1992. A naturally occurring peptide recognized by alloreactive CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes in association with a class I MHC protein. Cell 69: 989
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    Henderson, R. A., A. L. Cox, K. Sakaguchi, E. Appella, D. F. Hunt, V. H. Engelhard. 1993. Direct identification of an endogenous peptide recognized by multiple HLA-A2.1-specific cytotoxic T cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90: 10275
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    Aldrich, C. J., A. DeCloux, A. S. Woods, R. J. Cotter, M. J. Soloski, J. Forman. 1994. Identification of a Tap-dependent leader peptide recognized by alloreactive T cells specific for a class Ib antigen. Cell 79: 649
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    Poindexter, N. J., B. Naziruddin, D. W. McCourt, T. Mohanakumar. 1995. Isolation of a kidney-specific peptide recognized by alloreactive HLA-A3-restricted human CTL. J. Immunol. 154: 3880
    OpenUrlAbstract
  34. ↵
    Malarkannan, S., M. Afkarian, N. Shastri. 1995. A rare cryptic translation product is presented by Kb major histocompatibility complex class I molecule to alloreactive T cells. J. Exp. Med. 182: 1739
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    Wang, W., P. H. Gulden, R. A. Pierce, J. A. Shabanowitz, S. T. Man, D. F. Hunt, V. H. Engelhard. 1997. A naturally processed peptide presented by HLA-A*0201 is expressed at low abundance and recognized by an alloreactive CD8+ cytotoxic T cell with apparent high affinity. J. Immunol. 158: 5797
    OpenUrlAbstract
  36. ↵
    Paradela, A., M. Garcia-Peydro, J. Vazquez, D. Rognan, J. A. Lopez de Castro. 1998. The same natural ligand is involved in allorecognition of multiple HLA-B27 subtypes by a single T cell clone: role of peptide and the MHC molecule in alloreactivity. J. Immunol. 161: 5481
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    de Koster, H. S., C. J. Vermeulen, H. S. Hiemstra, R. Amons, J. W. Drijfhout, F. Koning. 1999. Definition of agonists and design of antagonists for alloreactive T cell clones using synthetic peptide libraries. Int. Immunol. 11: 585
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    Burrows, S. R., R. Khanna, D. J. Moss. 1999. Direct alloreactivity by human cytotoxic T lymphocytes can be inhibited by altered peptide ligand antagonism. Blood 93: 1020
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    Miceli, M. C., O. J. Finn. 1989. T cell receptor β-chain selection in human allograft rejection. J. Immunol. 142: 81
    OpenUrlAbstract
  40. ↵
    Finn, O. J., M. C. Miceli. 1989. Effector T-cell repertoire selection in human allograft rejection. Transplant. Proc. 21: 346
    OpenUrlPubMed
  41. ↵
    Frisman, D. M., A. A. Hurwitz, W. T. Bennett, L. A. Boyle, J. T. Fallon, G. W. Dec, R. B. Colvin, J. T. Kurnick. 1990. Clonal analysis of graft-infiltrating lymphocytes from renal and cardiac biopsies: dominant rearrangements of TcR β genes and persistence of dominant rearrangements in serial biopsies. Hum. Immunol. 28: 208
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    Dietrich, P. Y., A. Caignard, A. Lim, V. Chung, J. L. Pico, C. Pannetier, P. Kourilsky, T. Hercend, J. Even, F. Triebel. 1994. In vivo T-cell clonal amplification at time of acute graft-versus-host disease. Blood 84: 2815
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    Gaschet, J., C. Denis, N. Milpied, M. M. Hallet, F. Romagne, A. Necker, R. Vivien, J. David-Ameline, F. Davodeau, M. Bonneville. 1995. Alterations of T cell repertoire after bone marrow transplantation: characterization of over-represented subsets. Bone Marrow Transplant. 16: 427
    OpenUrlPubMed
  44. ↵
    Lopez, D., R. Garcia Hoyo, J. A. Lopez de Castro. 1994. Clonal analysis of alloreactive T cell responses against the closely related B*2705 and B*2703 subtypes: implications for HLA-B27 association to spondyloarthropathy. J. Immunol. 152: 5557
    OpenUrlAbstract
  45. ↵
    Cerundolo, V., J. Alexander, K. Anderson, C. Lamb, P. Cresswell, A. McMichael, F. Gotch, A. Townsend. 1990. Presentation of viral antigen controlled by a gene in the major histocompatibility complex. Nature 345: 449
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    Ljunggren, H. G., and K. Karre. 1985. Host resistance directed selectively against H-2-deficient lymphoma variants: analysis of the mechanism. J. Exp. Med. 1:162:1745.
  47. ↵
    De Silva, A. D., A. Boesteanu, R. Song, N. Nagy, E. Harhaj, C. V. Harding, S. Joyce. 1999. Thermolabile H-2Kb molecules expressed by transporter associated with antigen processing-deficient RMA-S cells are occupied by low-affinity peptides. J. Immunol. 163: 4413
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    Jardetzky, T. S., W. S. Lane, R. A. Robinson, D. R. Madden, D. C. Wiley. 1991. Identification of self peptides bound to purified HLA-B27. Nature 353: 326
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    Galocha, B., J. R. Lamas, J. A. Villadangos, J. P. Albar, J. A. Lopez de Castro. 1996. Binding of peptides naturally presented by HLA-B27 to the differentially disease-associated B*2704 and B*2706 subtypes, and to mutants mimicking their polymorphism. Tissue Antigens 48: 509
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    Daniel, C., S. Horvath, P. M. Allen. 1998. A basis for alloreactivity: MHC helical residues broaden peptide recognition by the TCR. Immunity 8: 543
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    Hornell, T. M., J. C. Solheim, N. B. Myers, W. E. Gillanders, G. K. Balendiran, T. H. Hansen, J. M. Connolly. 1999. Alloreactive and syngeneic CTL are comparably dependent on interaction with MHC class I α-helical residues. J. Immunol. 163: 3217
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    Sykulev, Y., A. Brunmark, T. J. Tsomides, S. Kageyama, M. Jackson, P. A. Peterson, H. N. Eisen. 1994. High-affinity reactions between antigen-specific T-cell receptors and peptides associated with allogeneic and syngeneic major histocompatibility complex class I proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 11487
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. ↵
    Garcia, K. C., M. D. Tallquist, L. R. Pease, A. Brunmark, C. A. Scott, M. Degano, E. A. Stura, P. A. Peterson, I. A. Wilson, L. Teyton. 1997. αβ T cell receptor interactions with syngeneic and allogeneic ligands: affinity measurements and crystallization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 13838
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. ↵
    Eisen, H. N., Y. Sykulev, T. J. Tsomides. 1996. Antigen-specific T-cell receptors and their reactions with complexes formed by peptides with major histocompatibility complex proteins. Adv. Protein Chem. 49: 1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    Krebs, S., J. R. Lamas, S. Poenaru, G. Folkers, J. A. de Castro, D. Seebach, D. Rognan. 1998. Substituting nonpeptidic spacers for the T cell receptor-binding part of class I major histocompatibility complex-binding peptides. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 19072
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. ↵
    Rognan, D., L. Scapozza, G. Folkers, A. Daser. 1995. Rational design of nonnatural peptides as high-affinity ligands for the HLA-B*2705 human leukocyte antigen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 753
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 165 (10)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 165, Issue 10
15 Nov 2000
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Antagonism of Direct Alloreactivity of an HLA-B27-Specific CTL Clone by Altered Peptide Ligands of Its Natural Epitope
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Antagonism of Direct Alloreactivity of an HLA-B27-Specific CTL Clone by Altered Peptide Ligands of Its Natural Epitope
Marina García-Peydró, Alberto Paradela, Juan P. Albar, José A. López de Castro
The Journal of Immunology November 15, 2000, 165 (10) 5680-5685; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.10.5680

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Antagonism of Direct Alloreactivity of an HLA-B27-Specific CTL Clone by Altered Peptide Ligands of Its Natural Epitope
Marina García-Peydró, Alberto Paradela, Juan P. Albar, José A. López de Castro
The Journal of Immunology November 15, 2000, 165 (10) 5680-5685; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.10.5680
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Efficient Identification of Tembusu Virus CTL Epitopes in Inbred HBW/B4 Ducks Using a Novel MHC Class I–Restricted Epitope Screening Scheme
  • Poor-Quality Vβ Recombination Signal Sequences and the DNA Damage Response ATM Kinase Collaborate to Establish TCRβ Gene Repertoire and Allelic Exclusion
  • Multifaceted Activities of Seven Nanobodies against Complement C4b
Show more MOLECULAR AND STRUCTURAL IMMUNOLOGY

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • FAR 889
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2022 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606