Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
      • Neuroimmunology: To Sense and Protect
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Differential Role of Fas/Fas Ligand Interactions in Cytolysis of Primary and Metastatic Colon Carcinoma Cell Lines by Human Antigen-Specific CD8+ CTL

Elke S. Bergmann-Leitner and Scott I. Abrams
J Immunol May 1, 2000, 164 (9) 4941-4954; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.164.9.4941
Elke S. Bergmann-Leitner
Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, Division of Basic Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott I. Abrams
Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, Division of Basic Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Comparison of SW480 to SW620 cells for differences in tumorigenic properties. A, Cellular penetration in a Boyden chamber as an in vitro assay of chemoinvasion, as described in Materials and Methods. After incubation, the cells that penetrated the membrane filter were enumerated under the microscope. Data were expressed as the mean ± SEM of five separate experiments. B, Tumor growth in athymic mice as a measure of tumorigenicity. Athymic mice were inoculated with either SW480 or SW620 tumor cells (10 × 106 or 3 × 106 cells/mouse in experiments 1 and 2, respectively). Data were expressed as the mean ± SEM of five and four mice/group at each time point in experiments 1 and 2, respectively. C, Tumor cell migration to draining lymph nodes as a surrogate assessment of metastatic ability. At the end of experiment 2 (by day 30), TDLN and the contralateral non-TDLN were analyzed by flow cytometry for cell-surface expression of DF3. Staining with MOPC-21 as an isotype-matched primary Ab (range, 3–11%) was subtracted from the values shown. Data were expressed as the mean ± SEM of four mice/tumor-bearing group. Similar patterns were observed by intracellular staining of human cytokeratin, which distinguishes normal from malignant cells (not shown).

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Fas-dependent and Fas-independent pathways in CTL-mediated lysis of IFN-γ-pretreated SW480 and SW620 cells. A, CTL-mediated lysis of IFN-γ-pretreated SW480 or SW620 cells was measured by 51Cr release at multiple E:T ratios (in a 12-h assay; spontaneous release of 51Cr for all targets was ≤13%). Assays were also conducted in the absence and presence of anti-Fas mAb, clone ZB4 (10 μg/ml). Because of the size or overlap of symbols, error bars may be partly masked. Percent specific lysis of untreated SW480 cells at E:T ratios of 20:1 and 5:1, 8 ± 4 and 4 ± 1; for untreated SW620 cells, 22 ± 3 and 13 ± 1. B, IFN-γ-pretreated SW480 or SW620 cells were radiolabeled with [125I]IUdR and tested against anti-ras CTL (E:T ratio, 10:1; 12 h assay) to determine the extent of nuclear damage. Assays were also conducted in the absence and presence of Ab, as in A. Data in A and B were expressed as the mean ± SEM of triplicate cultures and are representative of five and four separate experiments, respectively. C, Effect of IFN-γ pretreatment on expression of the mutant ras Val12 determinant in SW480 and SW620 cells. Cell lysates were collected from tumor cells, as shown, and then assayed in titrating amounts in a mutant ras Val12-specific ELISA. Data were expressed as the mean OD (490 nm) ± SEM of five separate experiments.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Comparison of SW480 to SW620 cells for functional Fas expression. A, Tumor cells, either untreated (−IFN-γ) or pretreated with IFN-γ (+IFN-γ), were incubated with CH-11 or an isotype-matched Ab (at the highest concentration tested, 3 μg/ml). Cell death was measured by 51Cr release (18 h assay). B, In parallel, these same tumor cell lines were incubated with sFasL or TNF-α (at the highest dose tested, 100 ng/ml; ∼1000 U/ml). The extent of CH-11 (A)- or sFasL (B)-induced lysis of SW620 cells was the same with or without IFN-γ pretreatment. Also, in A and B, Jurkat cells served both as a Fas- and TNF-sensitive positive control. C, Anti-MART-127–35-specific CTL were incubated either in the absence (“unstimulated”) or presence (“pre-activated”) of immobilized anti-CD3 mAb. Afterward, one aliquot was analyzed for FasL expression by flow cytometry, while a second aliquot was used as effectors in 51Cr release assays against the indicated target cells (E:T ratio, 10:1). CH-11 or isotype (1μ/ml) used as in A. D, In additional control experiments, clone ZB4 was tested at multiple concentrations for potency, based on its ability to inhibit CH-11 (1 μg/ml)-mediated lysis of Jurkat and IFN-γ-pretreated SW480 cells. Percent specific lysis of Jurkat and IFN-γ-pretreated SW480 cells with CH-11, but without ZB4, 94 ± 5 and 48 ± 2, respectively. Data in all panels were expressed as the mean ± SEM of triplicate cultures and are representative of four separate experiments for A–C and two separate experiments for D.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Apoptotic cell death induced by agonistic anti-Fas mAb. IFN-γ-pretreated SW480 (A) or SW620 (B) cells were incubated without (dashed line) or with (solid thick line) CH-11 (1 μg/ml). Solid thin line represents untreated tumor cells incubated with CH-11. (C) Jurkat cells were incubated without (solid thin line) or with CH-11 (solid thick line). After a 24-h incubation, all tumor cell populations were analyzed for apoptotic death by the TUNEL assay. Dotted line in all panels denotes tumor cells (Jurkat or IFN-γ-pretreated SW480 or SW620 cells) cultured with CH-11 but analyzed by the TUNEL assay without the enzyme. Data are representative of four separate experiments.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    Ag-specific CTL-mediated lysis of IFN-γ-pretreated SW480 and SW620 cells involves distinct effector mechanisms. A, Cytotoxicity against IFN-γ-pretreated tumor cells (E:T ratio, 10:1) was assayed in the presence of the indicated blocking mAb. Isotype-matched Ab had no significant inhibitory effect (not shown). Assays were also conducted in the presence of CMA (10 μM). B, In a separate experiment, cytotoxicity against IFN-γ-pretreated tumor cells was assayed in the presence of anti-FasL mAb, anti-Fas mAb, CMA, or a combination of both anti-Fas mAb and CMA. Ab, 10 μg/ml; CMA (10 μM). Data in A and B were expressed as the mean ± SEM of triplicate cultures and are representative of four separate experiments. CMA (at an optimal inhibitory dose of 10 μM, based on titration experiments) did not alter viability of either cell population, as determined by trypan blue dye exclusion and spontaneous release of 51Cr from radiolabeled targets. The inhibitory effect was at the level of the effector cell, because pretreatment of the CTL, but not of the target cells, resulted in reduction of lysis (not shown).

  • FIGURE 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 6.

    IFN-γ-pretreated SW480 and SW620 cells were lysed by a second, independently isolated, HLA-A2-restricted, anti-ras Val12-specific CD8+ CTL line. Using a second anti-ras Val12-specific CD8+ CTL line, the nature and spectrum of cytotoxic mechanisms used against Ag-bearing, IFN-γ-pretreated SW480 and SW620 cells was determined as in Figs. 2 and 5. 51Cr release assays were conducted in the absence (“no Ab”) and presence of ZB4 or an isotype control, or CMA to determine the role of Fas-dependent and Fas-independent pathways in Ag-specific tumor cell killing of SW480 (A) or SW620 (B) tumor cells. Data in both panels were expressed as the mean ± SEM of triplicate cultures and are representative of four separate experiments.

  • FIGURE 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 7.

    Induction of FasL expression on anti-ras Val12 CD8+ CTL lines after TCR stimulation. Anti-ras 4–12(Val12)-specific CTL and anti-ras 5–14(Val12)-specific CTL were stimulated in vitro with immobilized anti-CD3 mAb or adherent IFN-γ-pretreated SW480 or SW620 cells. Parallel CTL cultures incubated in the absence of anti-CD3 mAb or tumor cells were characterized as unstimulated. Nonadherent cell suspensions were then analyzed for cell-surface expression of both CD8 and FasL markers. Data are representative of three separate experiments.

  • FIGURE 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 8.

    Effect of 5-FU treatment on susceptibility of SW480 and SW620 cells to Fas-mediated lysis by agonistic anti-Fas mAb. SW480 and SW620 cells were pretreated with 5-FU at multiple concentrations and recultured with CH-11 or an isotype control Ab (MOPC-104E) (each at 1 μg/ml). Untreated (−IFN-γ) and IFN-γ-pretreated tumor cells (in the absence of 5-FU pretreatment) were examined at the same time for comparison (see insert). Cell death was determined by 51Cr release assays (18 h assay). 5-FU pretreatment alone, at the concentrations shown, did not alter SW480 or SW620 cellular viability based on trypan blue dye exclusion and spontaneous release of 51Cr relative to the untreated controls. Data were expressed as the mean ± SEM of triplicate cultures and are representative of four separate experiments.

  • FIGURE 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 9.

    5-FU sensitizes SW480, but not SW620, to Fas-mediated cytotoxicity in response to Ag-specific CTL. A, SW480 cells were pretreated with IFN-γ or 5-FU as in Fig. 8. After treatment, tumor cells were used as targets in 51Cr release assays, and lytic activity was determined using anti-ras 4–12(Val12)-specific CTL at multiple E:T cell ratios. B, In a separate experiment, the nature of the CTL effector mechanisms against 5-FU-pretreated (30 μg/ml) SW480 cells was determined (E:T ratio, 10:1) in the absence (“none”) and presence of ZB4 or an isotype control (MOPC-21) (each at 10 μg/ml) or CMA (10 μM). C, Same as in A, except targets were SW620 tumor cells. Data in all panels were expressed as the mean ± SEM of triplicate cultures and are representative of four separate experiments.

  • FIGURE 10.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 10.

    Isolation of Fas-insensitive SW480 cells with enhanced metastatic ability. A, SW480.sel were tested for functional Fas activity, as in Fig. 3A, using IFN-γ-pretreated cells (with CH-11 or MOPC-104E isotype, each at 1 μg/ml). SW480.sel/ZB4 cells, derived in the presence of IFN-γ, CH-11, and ZB4, were included as a control for specificity of CH-11-mediated effects. B, Anti-ras CTL-mediated lysis of IFN-γ-pretreated SW480 or SW480.sel cells (at E:T ratio of 10:1), as determined in Fig. 5. C, SW480.sel cells retain their Ag recognition capability, as determined by cold target inhibition. Anti-ras 4–12(Val12) CTL was assayed against 51Cr-labeled (“hot”) IFN-γ-pretreated SW480 targets (effector:hot target ratio, 10:1) in the presence of various unlabeled (“cold”) IFN-γ-pretreated competitor targets (shown in the legend box) at multiple cold target densities. CTL were preincubated with cold targets for 30 min before adding hot targets (assay length, 12 h). Percent specific lysis in the absence of cold target competitor, 50 ± 1. Data in A–C were expressed as the mean ± SEM of triplicate cultures and are representative of at least four separate experiments. D, Tumor cell dissemination to draining lymph nodes, as determined in Fig. 1C. Athymic mice received 5 × 106 cells/mouse s.c. Tumor growth by SW480 and SW480.sel cells at the time of analysis averaged 1345 ± 334 and 1424 ± 262 mm3, respectively. TDLN and non-TDLN from each mouse were analyzed for DF3 cell-surface expression. Data were expressed as the mean ± SEM of five mice/tumor-bearing group and are representative of two separate experiments.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table I.

    Phenotypic comparison of SW480 to SW620 colon carcinoma cells before and after IFN-γ pretreatmenta

    Tumor Cell LineIFN-γ PretreatmentmAb Directed Against % Positive Cells (MFI)
    HLA-A2ICAM-1LFA-3Fas
    SW480Untreated72 ± 839 ± 696 ± 0.413 ± 4
    (68 ± 7)(42 ± 6)(114 ± 9)(30 ± 2)
    Pretreated 97 ± 1 98 ± 1 96 ± 0.4 65 ± 4
    (544 ± 32) (289 ± 35) (90 ± 9)(41 ± 3)
    SW620Untreated96 ± 153 ± 897 ± 0.42 ± 0.4
    (100 ± 10)(35 ± 5)(92 ± 5)(18 ± 2)
    Pretreated97 ± 0.4 95 ± 1 96 ± 1 15 ± 4
    (499 ± 23) (214 ± 26) (70 ± 3)(20 ± 1)
    • a Tumor cells, either untreated or pretreated with IFN-γ, were evaluated by flow cytometry for cell-surface expression of the indicated molecule. Data were expressed as the mean ± SEM of the percentage positive cells and MFI (in parentheses) of 8 (for HLA-A2, ICAM-1), 4 (for LFA-3), and 12 (for Fas) separate experiments. Staining with the appropriate isotype control Ab, which ranged from 2 to 10%, was subtracted from the values shown above. Data in bold type indicate statistically significant responses, based on comparison with the corresponding untreated preparations. For SW480 cells: HLA-A2: percentage positive cells, p < 0.02; MFI, p < 0.0001; ICAM-1: percentage positive cells, p < 0.0001; MFI, p < 0.0001; Fas: percentage positive cells, p < 0.0001. For SW620 cells: HLA-A2: MFI, p < 0.0001; ICAM-1: percentage positive cells, p < 0.001; MFI, p < 0.001; Fas: percentage positive cells, p < 0.005.

    • View popup
    Table II.

    Effect of IFN-γ pretreatment of SW480 and SW620 colon carcinoma cells on effector cell-target cell conjugate formation

    Tumor Cell LineIFN-γ (+/–)aCTLbAbc% Conjugatesd
    SW480– ras None4.4 ± 0.03
    –MART-1None4.9 ± 0.03
    SW480+ ras None35.4 ± 0.6
    + ras Anti-ICAM-14.5 ± 0.2
    + ras Isotype35.2 ± 1.8
    +MART-1None4.2 ± 0.1
    SW620– ras None5.7 ± 0.3
    –MART-1None2.9 ± 0.9
    SW620+ ras None30.6 ± 1.4
    + ras Anti-ICAM-15.2 ± 0.8
    + ras Isotype38.1 ± 1.4
    +MART-1None3.9 ± 0.5
    • a Tumor cells, untreated (–) or pretreated (+) with IFN-γ, as described in Table I⇑ and Fig. 2⇑, were then labeled with a red fluorescent marker (PKH26).

    • b Anti-ras 4-12(Val12) CTL or anti-MART-127–35 CTL were prelabeled with a green fluorescent marker (BCECF).

    • c Anti-ICAM-1 or isotype control (MOPC-21) (10 μg/ml) were included in the assay.

    • d After incubation, cell suspensions (E:T ratio, 2:1) were immediately analyzed by flow cytometry for dual expression of BCECF+ PKH26+ events within the PKH26+ population. Additional controls included tumor cells 1) incubated in the absence of effectors; and 2) mixed with relevant effectors (ras CTL), but analyzed immediately without prior incubation. Under those conditions, two-color staining was <4%. The data were expressed as the mean ± SEM of triplicate tubes/group and are representative of three separate experiments.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 164 (9)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 164, Issue 9
1 May 2000
  • Table of Contents
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Differential Role of Fas/Fas Ligand Interactions in Cytolysis of Primary and Metastatic Colon Carcinoma Cell Lines by Human Antigen-Specific CD8+ CTL
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Differential Role of Fas/Fas Ligand Interactions in Cytolysis of Primary and Metastatic Colon Carcinoma Cell Lines by Human Antigen-Specific CD8+ CTL
Elke S. Bergmann-Leitner, Scott I. Abrams
The Journal of Immunology May 1, 2000, 164 (9) 4941-4954; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.9.4941

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Differential Role of Fas/Fas Ligand Interactions in Cytolysis of Primary and Metastatic Colon Carcinoma Cell Lines by Human Antigen-Specific CD8+ CTL
Elke S. Bergmann-Leitner, Scott I. Abrams
The Journal of Immunology May 1, 2000, 164 (9) 4941-4954; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.9.4941
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Differential Susceptibility to Staphylococcal Superantigen (SsAg)-Induced Apoptosis of CD4+ T Cells from Atopic Dermatitis Patients and Healthy Subjects: The Inhibitory Effect of IL-4 on SsAg-Induced Apoptosis
  • HIV-1 Vaccination Administered Intramuscularly Can Induce Both Systemic and Mucosal T Cell Immunity in HIV-1-Uninfected Individuals
  • Osteopontin (Eta-1) and Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 Cross-Talk in Angiogenesis
Show more Clinical Immunology

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • FAR 889
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606