Cutting Edge: Stromal Cell-Derived Factor-1 Is a Costimulator for CD4+ T Cell Activation

Toshihiro Nanki and Peter E. Lipsky
J Immunol May 15, 2000, 164 (10) 5010-5014; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.164.10.5010

Abstract

Stromal cell-derived factor (SDF)-1 is a chemoattractant for T cells, precursor B cells, monocytes, and neutrophils. SDF-1α was also found to up-regulate expression of early activation markers (CD69, CD25, and CD154) by anti-CD3-activated CD4+ T cells. In addition, SDF-1α costimulated proliferation of CD4+ T cells and production of IL-2, IFN-γ, IL-4, and IL-10. Stimulation with SDF-1α alone did not induce activation marker expression, proliferation, or cytokine production by the CD4+ T cells. SDF-1α-mediated costimulation was blocked by anti-CXC chemokine receptor-4 mAb. RANTES also increased activation marker expression by anti-CD3-stimulated peripheral CD4+ T cells, but less effectively than SDF-1α did, and did not up-regulate IL-2 production and proliferation. These results indicate that SDF-1 and CXC chemokine receptor-4 interactions not only play a role in T cell migration but also provide potent costimulatory signals to Ag-stimulated T cells.

Stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1),4 which is one of the CXC chemokines, was originally identified as a growth factor for murine pre-B cells (1, 2). It occurs in two alternative splice variants, SDF-1α and SDF-1β (1). SDF-1 is expressed constitutively by various cells and tissues (1, 3) and has chemoattractive activity for monocytes, bone marrow neutrophils, and early-stage B cell precursors (4, 5). In addition, SDF-1 is a highly efficient and potent chemoattractant for T cells (5). Furthermore, SDF-1 induces adhesion of T cells to ICAM-1 (CD54) (6) by up-regulating the binding activity of LFA-1 (CD11a/CD18). As a result of these activities, SDF-1 is thought to play an important role in the attraction of T cells into specific sites.

Mice lacking SDF-1 or CXC chemokine receptor-4 (CXCR4), the unique ligand of SDF-1, exhibited cardiovascular, vascular, and neurologic defects as well as defective B cell lymphopoiesis and a severe impairment of bone marrow myelopoiesis (7, 8, 9). SDF-1 is thought to attract progenitor B cells into the microenvironment of stromal cells where growth and differentiation factors are released (4, 7, 10, 11). These results suggest that in certain circumstances SDF-1 and CXCR4 interactions may have other functions than merely their chemoattractant activities.

To examine other specific activities of SDF-1/CXCR4 interactions, we examined the capacity of SDF-1α to stimulate T cell activation. Costimulation with SDF-1α up-regulated the expression of activation markers, proliferation, and cytokine production by anti-CD3-activated CD4+ T cells. These findings indicate that besides a role in chemoattraction, SDF-1α may play an important role in costimulating activation of Ag-reactive T cells.

Materials and Methods

Sample

PBMCs were isolated by Ficoll-Hypaque (Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ) gradient centrifugation from healthy donors. CD4+ T cells were isolated by negative selection using StemSep columns (Stem Cell Technologies, Vancouver, Canada). Purity of the separated CD4+ T cells was more than 95%.

Culture

The purified peripheral CD4+ cells (2 × 106 cells/ml) were cultured in RPMI 1640 with 10% FCS for 6 h because this induced spontaneous expression of CXCR4, the ligand for SDF-1 on the T cells. For blocking CXCR4, 50 μg/ml anti-CXCR4 mAb (12G5; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) or isotype-matched control mAb (20102.1; R&D Systems) was added for the last hour. Afterward, the cells were incubated in medium supplemented where indicated with SDF-1α or RANTES (R&D Systems) for 2 h. Subsequently, the CD4+ T cells were transferred to 96-well microtiter plates with or without anti-CD3 mAb OKT3 (500 ng/microwell (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA)). After incubation at 37°C for 8 h, surface activation marker expression was analyzed, cytokine production was analyzed after 8–12 h, and proliferation was determined after 20–60 h.

FACS analysis

PE-conjugated anti-CXCR4 mAb (12G5; R&D Systems), FITC- or PE-conjugated anti-CD69 mAb (L78; Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA), FITC-conjugated anti-CD25 mAb (ACT-1; Dako, Carpinteria, CA), and FITC- or PE-conjugated anti-CD154 mAb (TRAP1, PharMingen, San Diego, CA; and 89h76, Becton Dickinson; respectively) were used. The stimulated peripheral CD4+ T cells were stained with the above mAbs and were analyzed with a FACScan (Becton Dickinson).

Proliferation assay

To analyze CD4+ T cell proliferation, the MTT assay (Cell Proliferation Kit I (MTT); Roche, Indianapolis, IN) was used according to the manufacturer’s protocol, and the data reported as OD units.

ELISA

Cytokine concentrations in the culture supernatant were assayed with ELISA kits for IL-2 (R&D Systems), IFN-γ (R&D Systems), IL-4 (R&D Systems), and IL-10 (BioSource International, Camarillo, CA). Cells were cultured for 8 h to assess IL-2 and IFN-γ production and for 12 h to determine IL-4 and IL-10 production.

Statistics

To compare proliferation and cytokine expression, the Student t test was used.

Results

CXCR4 expression by peripheral CD4+ T cells and cultured CD4+ T cells

Purified peripheral CD4+ T cells expressed low levels of CXCR4 (Fig. 1⇓). Culture with medium for 6 h up-regulated surface CXCR4 expression. Stimulation with anti-CD3 mAb for 8 h did not further up-regulate CXCR4 expression beyond that induced by culture in medium alone.

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.

CXCR4 expression of peripheral CD4+ T cells and cultured CD4+ T cells. CXCR4 expression was analyzed by FACS. The data shown are from CD4+ T cells stained with an isotype-matched control mAb (A), stained with anti-CXCR4 mAb (B), from CD4+ T cells cultured with medium for 6 h (C), or stimulated with anti-CD3 for 8 h (D) and stained with anti-CXCR4 mAb. Representative data from one of three independent experiments are shown.

Costimulation of CD4+ T cell function by SDF-1α

Anti-CD3 induced expression of CD69, CD25, and CD154, whereas SDF-1α did not (Fig. 2⇓). The combination of anti-CD3 + SDF-1α increased expression of all activation markers beyond that induced by anti-CD3 alone.

FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.

SDF-1α up-regulates activation marker expression by anti-CD3-stimulated CD4+ T cells. Peripheral CD4+ T cells were cultured with medium for 6 h and then were stimulated in medium supplemented with 500 ng/ml SDF-1α for 2 h. Subsequently, the T cells were transferred to microtiter plates with or without coating with anti-CD3 mAb and were cultured for 8 h. Expression of CD69 (A), CD25 (B), and CD154 (C) was measured by FACS. Representative data from one of three independent experiments are shown. Presence of SDF-1α or anti-CD3 mAb is indicated.

Similarly, anti-CD3 stimulation induced proliferation of peripheral CD4+ T cells, whereas SDF-1α alone did not (Fig. 3⇓). However, SDF-1α significantly enhanced proliferation of anti-CD3-stimulated CD4+ T cells in a concentration-dependent manner. Finally, SDF-1α costimulated cytokine production by anti-CD3-stimulated CD4+ T cells (Fig. 4⇓). Although SDF-1α alone failed to induce cytokine production by CD4+ T cells, it caused significant concentration-dependent increases in production of all cytokines measured by anti-CD3-stimulated CD4+ T cells.

FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.

SDF-1α up-regulates CD4+ T cell proliferation. Peripheral CD4+ T cells were cultured with medium for 6 h, and then the T cells were stimulated in medium supplemented with SDF-1α for 2 h. Subsequently, the T cells were transferred to microtiter plates with or without coating with anti-CD3 mAb and were cultured for 20 (A), 40 (B), and 60 h (C). The proliferation was measured by MTT assay and reported as OD units. Representative mean data from one of three independent experiments analyzed in triplicate are shown. Concentration of SDF-1α (ng/ml) and the presence of anti-CD3 mAb are indicated. ∗, p < 0.05; ∗∗, p < 0.01.

FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4.

SDF-1α up-regulates cytokine production. Peripheral CD4+ T cells were cultured with medium for 6 h and then were stimulated in medium supplemented with SDF-1α for 2 h. Subsequently, the T cells were transferred to microtiter plates with or without coating with anti-CD3 mAb and were cultured for 8 h for IL-2 and IFN-γ production or for 12 h for IL-4 and IL-10 secretion. IL-2 (A), IFN-γ (B), IL-4 (C), and IL-10 (D) concentration in the culture supernatant was analyzed by ELISA. Representative mean data from one of three independent experiments analyzed in triplicate are shown. Concentration of SDF-1α (ng/ml) and the presence of anti-CD3 mAb are indicated. ∗, p < 0.05; ∗∗, p < 0.005.

The SDF-1α-mediated enhancement of CD154, CD69, and CD25 expression by anti-CD3-stimulated peripheral CD4+ T cells was blocked by anti-CXCR4 mAb (Fig. 5⇓A and data not shown). In addition, the enhancement of IL-2 production was blocked by anti-CXCR4 mAb (Fig. 5⇓B).

FIGURE 5.
FIGURE 5.

Anti-CXCR4 mAb blocks enhancement of CD154 expression and IL-2 production by SDF-1α. Peripheral CD4+ T cells were cultured with medium for 5 h to up-regulate expression of CXCR4 and then were incubated with isotype-matched control mAb or anti-CXCR4 mAb for 1 h. Subsequently, they were stimulated in medium supplemented with 100 ng/ml SDF-1α for 2 h. The T cells were transferred to microtiter plates coated with anti-CD3 mAb and cultured for 8 h. A, Expression of CD154 was assessed by FACS. The data obtained from the cells incubated with isotype-matched control mAb (upper panels) and from the cells incubated with anti-CXCR4 mAb (lower panels) are depicted. Representative data from one of two independent experiments are shown. B, IL-2 concentration in the culture supernatant was analyzed by ELISA. Representative mean data from one of two independent experiments analyzed in triplicate are shown. Presence of SDF-1α, control mAb, or anti-CXCR4 mAb is indicated.

RANTES also increased CD154, CD69, and CD25 expression by anti-CD3-stimulated peripheral CD4+ T cells (Fig. 6⇓A and data not shown). However, the degree of the enhancement by RANTES was smaller than that by SDF-1α. Moreover, costimulation with RANTES did not up-regulate IL-2 production and proliferation by anti-CD3-stimulated peripheral CD4+ T cells (Fig. 6⇓B and data not shown).

FIGURE 6.
FIGURE 6.

Comparison of costimulatory efficacy of SDF-1α and RANTES. Peripheral CD4+ T cells were cultured with medium for 6 h and then were stimulated in medium supplemented with 50 or 500 ng/ml SDF-1α or RANTES for 2 h. Subsequently, the T cells were transferred to microtiter plates coated with anti-CD3 mAb. After an 8-h incubation, expression of CD154 was assessed by FACS (A). The data obtained from the cells incubated without chemokines (left panel), from the cells costimulated with SDF-1α (center panel), and from the cells costimulated with RANTES (right panel) are depicted. Representative data from one of two independent experiments are shown. After 60 h of culture, proliferation was measured by MTT assay and reported as OD units (B). Representative mean data from one of two independent experiments analyzed in triplicate are shown. Concentrations of SDF-1α and RANTES are indicated. ∗, p < 0.01.

Discussion

The current data show that SDF-1α is a costimulator of peripheral CD4+ T cell activation. SDF-1α up-regulated cell surface activation marker expression, proliferation, and cytokine productions by anti-CD3-stimulated CD4+ T cells. Stimulation with SDF-1α alone did not up-regulate any of these functions. It is important to note that resting peripheral CD4+ T cells express CXCR4, the ligand for SDF-1 (36–53% positive; n = 3), and can respond to SDF-1α by migration (data not shown). However, SDF-1α enhanced activation of CD4+ T cells only when they were also stimulated with anti-CD3. These results suggest that SDF-1 may play an important role not only in T cell migration but also in the effective activation of Ag-stimulated T cells.

Recently, it was shown that SDF-1 also binds a non-CXCR4 receptor (12) and could associate with heparan sulfate (13), suggesting that CXCR4 may not be a unique ligand for SDF-1. However, the current data showed that anti-CXCR4 mAb blocked the costimulation of anti-CD3-activated CD4+ T cells by SDF-1, establishing that CXCR4 is necessary for the costimulation by SDF-1.

In the periphery, mainly naive CD4+ T cells express CXCR4 (14, 15, 16), although a substantial percentage (28–37%; n = 3) of memory T cells also express CXCR4. SDF-1 and CXCR4 interactions have been thought to be primarily involved in normal homeostasis by playing a role in the homing of naive T cells to secondary lymphoid organs (17). The current data suggest that SDF-1 and CXCR4 interaction could also play a role in costimulating Ag-activated CD4+ T cells during immune responses in secondary lymphoid organs. Cytokine productions by the CD4+ T cells along with CD154 (CD40 ligand) expression were up-regulated by SDF-1 costimulation. The expressed cytokines and CD40 ligand could activate B cells and DCs in lymphoid organs. Thus, SDF-1 may not only attract T cells to secondary lymphoid organs but also may play an important role in costimulating their ability to effect a successful immune response.

Recently, we found that SDF-1 and CXCR4 interaction might be important for accumulation of CD4+ T cells in rheumatoid arthritis synovium.5 The current data showed that SDF-1 could also be a costimulator of CD4+ T cell activation. Thus, SDF-1 and CXCR4 interactions might act not only to stimulate accumulation of CD4+ T cells in the rheumatoid arthritis synovium but also to costimulate their activation and thereby the capacity to influence the ongoing inflammation in the tissue.

The mechanism by which SDF-1 costimulates anti-CD3- induced T cell activation is not known. Previous data suggested that SDF-1 inhibited anti-CD3-stimulated phosphorylation of the TCR signaling molecules ZAP-70, SLP-76, and pp36 in Jurkat cells, suggesting that SDF-1 could down-regulate T cell activation (18). However, the current data showed that SDF-1 stimulation up-regulated anti-CD3-mediated activation of peripheral CD4+ T cells. The explanation for this discrepancy is currently unknown but could relate to different signaling capabilities of Jurkat cells and peripheral CD4+ T cells. Previous data have also indicated that SDF-1 stimulation induces phosphorylation of Pyk2 via a G-coupled protein pathway (19, 20). Activated Pyk2 is known to activate mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases, including p44/42 MAP (extra-cellular signal-related kinases 1 and 2) (19, 20, 21), c-Jun amino-terminal kinase, and p38 MAP kinase (22, 23). In addition, SDF-1 stimulation increased NF-κB activity (21). These signal pathways may be important in the capacity of SDF-1 to costimulate anti-CD3-induced T cell activation. It is noteworthy that SDF-1 alone did not activate peripheral CD4+ T cells, suggesting that signaling induced via Pyk2 activation may be insufficient to activate CD4+ T cells without costimulation by engagement of the CD3-TCR complex. In this regard, phosphorylation of Pyk2 has been shown to be induced by engagement of another costimulatory molecule, α4β1 (very late Ag 4) (24), which also is unable to stimulate T cell activation without engagement of the CD3-TCR complex. Therefore, Pyk2 might be an important molecule for costimulation by both SDF-1 and very late Ag 4, although it is likely that different proximal signaling pathways are involved. One of these could involve phosphoinositide 3-kinase, which has been shown to be involved in SDF-1 signaling by a number of cell types (25, 26).

It was previously shown that RANTES, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1α, MIP-1β, and monocyte chemotactic protein-1 could enhance CD25 expression, IL-2 production, and proliferation of anti-CD3-stimulated peripheral CD3+ T cells (27), and high concentrations of RANTES stimulated T cells without anti-CD3 stimulation (28). The current data confirmed that RANTES enhanced early activation marker expression by anti-CD3-stimulated CD4+ T cells. However, the effect of RANTES appeared to be considerably weaker than that of SDF-1α in that SDF-1α but not RANTES also enhanced proliferation and IL-2 production by anti-CD3-activated CD4+ T cells. Therefore, SDF-1 appears to have a greater potential as a costimulator of peripheral CD4+ T cells. It is unlikely that the results reflect the frequency of RANTES ligand expressing peripheral CD4+ T cells because RANTES can bind to numerous receptors, including C-C chemokine receptors 1, 3, 5, and 9. Although previous studies reported that RANTES enhanced IL-2 production and proliferation by anti-CD3-stimulated peripheral CD3+ T cells (27), the current data showed that RANTES did not enhance IL-2 production and proliferation by anti-CD3-stimulated peripheral CD4+ T cells. Therefore, it is possible that CD8+ T cells or γδ T cells are necessary for up-regulation of IL-2 production and proliferation by RANTES. Recently, it was reported that MIP-3β up-regulated IL-10 production by peripheral T cells stimulated with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 (29). However, MIP-3β did not up-regulate CD69 and CD25 expression. These results suggest that other chemokines may also have the potential to costimulate T cell activation, although the pattern of activation may differ for different chemokine-chemokine receptor interactions.

Footnotes

  • ↵1 This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant AR-39169.

  • ↵2 Current address: National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, Bethesda, MD 20892.

  • ↵3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Peter E. Lipsky at the current address: National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, Building 10, Room 9N228, 10 Center Drive MSC 1820, Bethesda, MD 20892-1820. E-mail address: lipskyp{at}mail.nih.gov

  • ↵4 Abbreviations used in this paper: SDF, stromal cell-derived factor; CXCR, CXC chemokine receptor; MIP, macrophage inflammatory protein.

  • ↵5 T. Nanki, K. Hayashida, H. J. Girschick, S. Yavuz, and P. E. Lipsky. SDF-1-CXCR4 interactions play a central role in CD4+ T cell accumulation in rheumatoid arthritis synovium. Submitted for publication.

  • Received December 22, 1999.
  • Accepted March 16, 2000.

References

  1. ↵
    Tashiro, K., H. Tada, R. Heilker, M. Shirozu, T. Nakano, T. Honjo. 1993. Signal sequence trap: a cloning strategy for secreted proteins and type I membrane proteins. Science 261: 600
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Nagasawa, T., H. Kikutani, T. Kishimoto. 1994. Molecular cloning and structure of a pre-B-cell growth-stimulating factor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 2305
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Jiang, W., P. Zhou, S. M. Kahn, N. Tomita, M. D. Johnson, I. B. Weinstein. 1994. Molecular cloning of TPAR1, a gene whose expression is repressed by the tumor promoter 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate (TPA). Exp. Cell Res. 215: 284
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    D’Apuzzo, M., A. Rolink, M. Loetscher, J. A. Hoxie, I. Clark-Lewis, F. Melchers, M. Baggiolini, B. Moser. 1997. The chemokine SDF-1, stromal cell-derived factor 1, attracts early stage B cell precursors via the chemokine receptor CXCR4. Eur. J. Immunol. 27: 1788
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Bleul, C. C., R. C. Fuhlbrigge, J. M. Casasnovas, A. Aiuti, T. A. Springer. 1996. A highly efficacious lymphocyte chemoattractant, stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1). J. Exp. Med. 184: 1101
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Campbell, J. J., J. Hedrick, A. Zlotnik, M. A. Siani, D. A. Thompson, E. C. Butcher. 1998. Chemokines and the arrest of lymphocytes rolling under flow conditions. Science 279: 381
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Nagasawa, T., S. Hirota, K. Tachibana, N. Takakura, S. Nishikawa, Y. Kitamura, N. Yoshida, H. Kikutani, T. Kishimoto. 1996. Defects of B-cell lymphopoiesis and bone-marrow myelopoiesis in mice lacking the CXC chemokine PBSF/SDF-1. Nature 382: 635
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Tachibana, K., S. Hirota, H. Iizasa, H. Yoshida, K. Kawabata, Y. Kataoka, Y. Kitamura, K. Matsushima, N. Yoshida, S. Nishikawa, et al 1998. The chemokine receptor CXCR4 is essential for vascularization of the gastrointestinal tract. Nature 393: 591
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Zou, Y. R., A. H. Kottmann, M. Kuroda, I. Taniuchi, D. R. Littman. 1998. Function of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 in haematopoiesis and in cerebellar development. Nature 393: 595
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Baggiolini, M.. 1998. Chemokines and leukocyte traffic. Nature 392: 565
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Aiuti, A., I. J. Webb, C. Bleul, T. Springer, J. C. Gutierrez-Ramos. 1997. The chemokine SDF-1 is a chemoattractant for human CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells and provides a new mechanism to explain the mobilization of CD34+ progenitors to peripheral blood. J. Exp. Med. 185: 111
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Rubbert, A., C. Combadiere, M. Ostrowski, J. Arthos, M. Dybul, E. Machado, M. A. Cohn, J. A. Hoxie, P. M. Murphy, A. S. Fauci, D. Weissman. 1998. Dendritic cells express multiple chemokine receptors used as coreceptors for HIV entry. J. Immunol. 160: 3933
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Amara, A., O. Lorthioir, A. Valenzuela, A. Magerus, M. Thelen, M. Montes, J. L. Virelizier, M. Delepierre, F. Baleux, H. Lortat-Jacob, F. Arenzana-Seisdedos. 1999. Stromal cell-derived factor-1α associates with heparan sulfates through the first beta-strand of the chemokine. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 23916
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Sallusto, F., D. Lenig, C. R. Mackay, A. Lanzavecchia. 1998. Flexible programs of chemokine receptor expression on human polarized T helper 1 and 2 lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 187: 875
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Bleul, C. C., L. Wu, J. A. Hoxie, T. A. Springer, C. R. Mackay. 1997. The HIV coreceptors CXCR4 and CCR5 are differentially expressed and regulated on human T lymphocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 1925
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Forster, R., E. Kremmer, A. Schubel, D. Breitfeld, A. Kleinschmidt, C. Nerl, G. Bernhardt, M. Lipp. 1998. Intracellular and surface expression of the HIV-1 coreceptor CXCR4/fusin on various leukocyte subsets: rapid internalization and recycling upon activation. J. Immunol. 160: 1522
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Sallusto, F., A. Lanzavecchia, C. R. Mackay. 1998. Chemokines and chemokine receptors in T-cell priming and Th1/Th2-mediated responses. Immunol. Today 19: 568
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Peacock, J. W., F. R. Jirik. 1999. TCR activation inhibits chemotaxis toward stromal cell-derived factor-1: evidence for reciprocal regulation between CXCR4 and the TCR. J. Immunol. 162: 215
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Dutt, P., J. F. Wang, J. E. Groopman. 1998. Stromal cell-derived factor-1α and stem cell factor/kit ligand share signaling pathways in hemopoietic progenitors: a potential mechanism for cooperative induction of chemotaxis. J. Immunol. 161: 3652
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Misse, D., M. Cerutti, N. Noraz, P. Jourdan, J. Favero, G. Devauchelle, H. Yssel, N. Taylor, F. Veas. 1999. A CD4-independent interaction of human immunodeficiency virus-1 gp120 with CXCR4 induces their cointernalization, cell signaling, and T-cell chemotaxis. Blood 93: 2454
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Ganju, R. K., S. A. Brubaker, J. Meyer, P. Dutt, Y. Yang, S. Qin, W. Newman, J. E. Groopman. 1998. The α-chemokine, stromal cell-derived factor-1α, binds to the transmembrane G-protein-coupled CXCR-4 receptor and activates multiple signal transduction pathways. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 23169
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Blaukat, A., I. Ivankovic-Dikic, E. Gronroos, F. Dolfi, G. Tokiwa, K. Vuori, I. Dikic. 1999. Adaptor proteins Grb2 and Crk couple Pyk2 with activation of specific mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 14893
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    Pandey, P., S. Avraham, S. Kumar, A. Nakazawa, A. Place, L. Ghanem, A. Rana, V. Kumar, P. K. Majumder, H. Avraham, et al 1999. Activation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase by PYK2/related adhesion focal tyrosine kinase-dependent mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 10140
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    van Seventer, G. A., M. M. Mullen, J. M. van Seventer. 1998. Pyk2 is differentially regulated by β1 integrin- and CD28-mediated co-stimulation in human CD4+ T lymphocytes. Eur. J. Immunol. 28: 3867
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Vicente-Manzanares, M., M. Rey, D. R. Jones, D. Sancho, M. Mellado, J. M. Rodriguez-Frade, M. A. del Pozo, M. Yanez-Mo, A. M. de Ana, C. Martinez-A, et al 1999. Involvement of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase in stromal cell-derived factor-1α-induced lymphocyte polarization and chemotaxis. J. Immunol. 163: 4001
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Sotsios, Y., G. C. Whittaker, J. Westwick, S. G. Ward. 1999. The CXC chemokine stromal cell-derived factor activates a Gi-coupled phosphoinositide 3-kinase in T lymphocytes. J. Immunol. 163: 5954
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Taub, D. D., S. M. Turcovski-Corrales, M. L. Key, D. L. Longo, W. J. Murphy. 1996. Chemokines and T lymphocyte activation. I. β Chemokines costimulate human T lymphocyte activation in vitro. J. Immunol. 156: 2095
    OpenUrlAbstract
  28. ↵
    Bacon, K. B., B. A. Premack, P. Gardner, T. J. Schall. 1995. Activation of dual T cell signaling pathways by the chemokine RANTES. Science 269: 1727
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    Byrnes, H. D., H. Kaminski, A. Mirza, G. Deno, D. Lundell, J. S. Fine. 1999. Macrophage inflammatory protein-3β enhances IL-10 production by activated human peripheral blood monocytes and T cells. J. Immunol. 163: 4715
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 164 (10)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 164, Issue 10
15 May 2000
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools

Jump to section