Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Cutting Edge: Human Anaphylatoxin C4a Is a Potent Agonist of the Guinea Pig But Not the Human C3a Receptor

Stefan Lienenklaus, Robert S. Ames, Mark A. Tornetta, Henry M. Sarau, James J. Foley, Torsten Crass, Bettina Sohns, Ute Raffetseder, Melanie Grove, Anja Hölzer, Andreas Klos, Jörg Köhl and Wilfried Bautsch
J Immunol September 1, 1998, 161 (5) 2089-2093;
Stefan Lienenklaus
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert S. Ames
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark A. Tornetta
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Henry M. Sarau
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James J. Foley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Torsten Crass
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bettina Sohns
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ute Raffetseder
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Melanie Grove
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anja Hölzer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andreas Klos
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jörg Köhl
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wilfried Bautsch
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The interaction of human anaphylatoxin C4a with the guinea pig (gp) and human (hu) C3a receptors (C3aR) was analyzed using human rC4a, which exhibited C4a-specific activity on guinea pig platelets. A gpC3aR of 475 residues with a large second extracellular loop and a peptide sequence ∼60% identical to the huC3aR was isolated from a genomic DNA library and found to be expressed in guinea pig heart, lung, and spleen. HEK-293 cells cotransfected with this clone, and a cDNA encoding Gα-16 specifically bound (Kd = 1.6 ± 0.7 nM) and responded functionally to C3a with an intracellular calcium mobilization (ED50 = 0.18 ± 0.02 nM). Human rC4a weakly bound to both the hu- and gpC3aR (IC50 > 1 μM). However, only HEK-293 cells expressing the gpC3aR responded functionally to rC4a (ED50 = 8.7 ± 0.52 nM), while cells expressing the huC3aR did not (c ≤ 1 μM). Thus, through an interaction with the C3aR, huC4a may elicit anaphylatoxic effects in guinea pigs but not in man.

The anaphylatoxins C3a, C4a, and C5a are small proteins of 74 to 77 residues that are generated in an inflammatory reaction by proteolytic cleavage from the complement components C3, C4, and C5, respectively. C3a and C5a are important chemotactic proinflammatory molecules, mediating smooth muscle contraction, increase in vascular permeability, and various cell activation and granule secretion reactions (for an overview, see Refs. 1 and 2).

Human C4a, first described in 1979, is regarded as the third anaphylatoxin (3) due to its structural similarity to C3a and C5a, its dependence on a carboxyl-terminal arginine residue for biologic activity, and its proinflammatory properties in guinea pigs. Although less active than C3a and C5a, in guinea pigs, human C4a induces smooth muscle contraction, increases vascular permeability (3), and induces granule secretion from platelets and O2− generation in macrophages (4, 5).

These biologic effects of C4a are subject to low dose desensitization (tachyphylaxis). Preincubation with substimulatory concentrations of C4a abrogates the functional response toward a subsequent 100% stimulus. In addition, cross-desensitization in guinea pig ileal contraction assays was observed between C4a and C3a, but not between C4a and C5a (3, 4). Based on these observations, C3a and C4a are thought to act on a common receptor. This view, however, has recently been questioned by Murakami and coworkers, who failed to detect desensitization of C3a-induced responses after pretreatment of guinea pig macrophages with human C4a (5). Furthermore, C4a did not inhibit binding of 125I-labeled C3a to guinea pig macrophages (5). These findings would indicate distinct and separate receptors for C3a and C4a in guinea pigs.

In man, convincing evidence for anaphylatoxic effects of human C4a is still missing. C4a has been reported to inhibit C3a-induced chemotaxis of macrophages (6), although at extremely low concentrations (10−16 M!). Also, C4a and C4a analogue synthetic peptides lead to a dose-dependent wheal and flare generation when injected into human skin (3, 7), although no negative controls were included in these experiments. Evidence for C4a effects in species other than man or guinea pig has not been reported.

Recently, the C3aR from man (huC3aR)4 (8, 9, 10) and mouse (11, 12) have been cloned. Stably transfected cell lines expressing these receptors and human neutrophils have been tested for functional response towards serum-purified human C4a and found to be completely unresponsive (11, 13). This would suggest the existence of a separate C4a receptor in man and mouse, on the premise that C4a is an anaphylatoxin in these species as well. However, no positive control demonstrating biologic activity of the C4a preparation used in these experiments was presented.

Highly purified human C4a is difficult to prepare and, due to the high C4a concentrations required in most test systems, even trace contamination with other biologically active molecules, especially C3a and C5a, may jeopardize the experiments, as has been reported in one of the above-mentioned investigations for serum-purified C4a (13). This possible contamination may well be the cause for some of the discrepant results presented above. Using human rC4a and cells functionally expressing a cloned guinea pig (gp) or huC3aR, we provide evidence that C4a functions as an agonist of the gpC3aR but not the huC3aR.

Materials and Methods

Materials

Human C3a was obtained from Advanced Research Technologies (San Diego, CA), 125I-labeled human C3a from NEN-DuPont (Boston, MA), and rC5a from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). The C3a carboxyl-terminal analogue synthetic peptide (WWGKKYRASKLGLAR, (W63,W64)C3a(63-77) (14)) was obtained from Bachem (King of Prussia, PA), and the C3a synthetic peptide P117 and control peptide P251 were prepared as described (9). Oligonucleotides were obtained from MWG Biotech (Ebersberg, Germany). N-terminal hexahistidine-tagged rC4a or rC4a with an N-terminal methionine residue was expressed in Escherichia coli and purified to homogeneity. The binding and functional activities of these two preparations of rC4a were equivalent.

Guinea pig platelet release assay

Functional characterization of rC4a was performed in a guinea pig ATP release assay, as described (15). Guinea pigs from strains C2BB/R+ (C3aR positive) and C2BB/R− (C3aR-negative) from our own breeding colonies were used as platelet donors (16). Desensitization was measured by preincubation of the platelets with the deactivating stimulus (a concentration leading to <10% ATP release, determined empirically at the beginning of each experiment) for 5 min at 37°C and subsequent addition of a 100% stimulus of either C3a (c = 10 nM), rC4a (c = 4 μM), or rC5a (c = 250 nM).

Cloning of the guinea pig C3aR

A partial DNA sequence of the gpC3aR was obtained by PCR amplification of genomic DNA using oligonucleotide primers derived from regions conserved between the human and mouse C3aR sequences (8, 9, 10, 11, 12). This fragment was used to screen a guinea pig genomic DNA library in λFIXII (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). A λ clone containing a genomic insert, which encoded the gpC3aR, was identified. The open reading frame of this clone plus an extra 48 bp of genomic DNA sequence at the 3′ end was subcloned into pcDNA3 (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA) and designated pSL94.

Receptor characterization

Competitive binding assays were performed essentially as described (9). A microtiter plate-based calcium mobilization assay, utilizing a fluorometric imaging plate reader (FLIPR; Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA), was used for the functional characterization of HEK-293 cells transiently expressing either the gpC3aR or huC3aR and Gα-16 (17). Briefly, cells were transfected using Lipofectamine Plus reagent (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD), and the following day they were plated in poly-d-lysine-coated 96-well black/clear plates (Becton Dickinson, Bedford, MA). After 18 to 24 h, the medium was aspirated from each well, and the cells were loaded with Fluo-3-AM (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). At initiation of the assay, fluorescence is read once every second for 60 s and then every 3 s for the following 60 s. Agonist was added at 10 s, and the maximal fluorescence count above background after addition was used to define maximal activity for that concentration of agonist. FLIPR software normalizes fluorescence readings to give equivalent readings for all wells at zero time.

Results and Discussion

Generation and characterization of rC4a

To avoid the problem of contamination in serum-purified human C4a preparations, we expressed rC4a. As shown in Figure 1⇓A, human rC4a was approximately three orders of magnitude less potent in a guinea pig ATP release assay than C3a, but induced ATP release at high nanomolar concentrations (ED50 ≈ 400 nM), comparable with the ED50 of 600 nM determined previously for serum-purified C4a in the serotonin release assay (4). Furthermore, in this assay, complete cross-tachyphylaxis between human C3a and rC4a, but not C5a, was observed (Fig. 1⇓B). In addition, platelets of the C3aR-negative guinea pig strain C2BB/R−, an inbred strain of our own breeding colonies with a functional C3aR deficiency (16), did not respond to either C3a or rC4a (data not shown). These data demonstrate the functional activity of the rC4a and confirm previous data on guinea pig cells showing cross-tachyphylaxis between C3a and C4a (3, 4). The simplest explanation of these data would be that C3a and C4a act through the same receptor. However, postreceptor mechanisms may account for the observed cross-tachphylaxis, as in the case of the FMLP-R and C5aR (18). We, therefore, set out to clone a C4a-binding C3aR from the guinea pig.

  FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Functional characterization of rC4a in the guinea pig platelet ATP release assay. A, Activation curves of C3a (circles; ED50 = 4.9 ± 1.3 × 10−10 M), rC4a (squares; ED50 = 4.1 ± 0.6 × 10−7 M) and the C3a analogue synthetic peptide P117 (triangles) (n = 3) (9 ). B, Desensitization of rC4a and C3a, but not rC5a, responses after preincubation of the platelets with substimulatory concentrations of rC4a or the C3a analogue synthetic peptide P117, respectively, and subsequent addition of C3a (10 nM), rC4a (4 μM), or rC5a (250 nM). RLU, relative light units; “X/Y”, deactivating stimulus/100% stimulus.

Cloning and characterization of gpC3aR

The coding regions of many G protein-coupled receptors, including the human C3aR (19), are not interrupted by introns. Therefore, we cloned the gpC3aR directly from a genomic DNA library. Using primer combinations conserved in the C3aR sequences of man (8, 9, 10) and mouse (11, 12), a genomic DNA fragment was amplified with high homology to the huC3aR. Using this fragment as a probe to screen a guinea pig library, a genomic λ clone was isolated with an open reading frame of 1428 bp, which encoded a protein of 475 residues with a calculated molecular mass of 53,570 Da and four potential N-glycosylation sites (Fig. 2⇓). The sequence encodes a G protein-coupled receptor with seven hydrophobic transmembrane domains, a large second extracellular loop of 165 amino acid residues, and a high homology to the C3aR sequences of man, mouse, and rat (8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 20). However, only half of the residues are conserved in all four known C3aR sequences (240/475 = 50.5%), and only 37 of the 165 residues in the second extracellular loop (22.4%) in the gpC3aR are found at the same position in the other C3aR sequences. The peptide sequence of this gpC3aR was disclosed in a recently published book (2); however, the nucleotide sequence has not been published nor does it appear in GenBank, and no functional or binding data have been presented. It is unlikely that this receptor is a pseudogene, since by RT-PCR, expression of this transcript was detected in guinea pig heart, lung, and spleen RNA (data not shown).

  FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequence of the cloned gpC3aR. The position of the four putative N-glycosylation sites is indicated in bold, the putative seven-transmembrane regions are underlined. The GenBank accession number for this nucleotide sequence is AJ006402.

HEK-293 cells transiently transfected with this receptor specifically bound human C3a. As shown in Figure 3⇓, competitive displacement studies revealed the presence of a high affinity receptor for C3a with an apparent Kd of ∼2 nM. As previously shown with the huC3aR, this binding was specific for C3a, because 125I-labeled C3a could be displaced in a dose-dependent manner by the synthetic C3a analogue peptide P117, but not by the unrelated peptide P251 (9). In addition, supramicromolar concentrations of rC4a (IC50 > 1 μM) were able to competitively displace radiolabeled C3a from both the guinea pig and huC3aR. Although human C4a is able to bind weakly to both the gpC3aR and huC3aR, the affinity of this interaction is three orders of magnitude lower than the affinity of C3a binding to the same receptors.

  FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Competitive binding curves in HEK-293 cells transiently transfected with the gpC3aR (filled symbols) or huC3aR (open symbols), respectively. 125I-labeled C3a was competitively displaced by increasing concentrations of C3a (circles), rC4a (squares), the synthetic C3a analogue peptide P117 (triangle), or the nonrelated synthetic peptide P251 (diamonds). C3a, Kd = 1.6 ± 0.9 nM (gpC3aR); Kd = 1.0 ± 0.9 nM (huC3aR); P117, IC50 = 1.9 ± 1.0 × 10−7 M (gpC3aR) (n ≥ 3).

C4a mediates functional responses via the gpC3aR but not the huC3aR

To compare the functional activity of the gpC3aR and huC3aR, we cotransfected the cDNA for each receptor, together with a cDNA clone encoding Gα-16, into HEK-293 cells and tested for intracellular calcium mobilization in response to rC4a, rC5a, C3a, or a C3a analogue peptide. Previously, we reported that cotransfection of the huC3aR sequence with Gα-16 was necessary to render transfected HEK-293 cells responsive to C3a (9). As shown in Figure 4⇓A, cells expressing the gpC3aR responded in a dose-dependent manner not only to C3a (ED50 = 0.18 ± 0.02 nM) and the C3a peptide (ED50 = 0.15 ± 0.01 nM), but also to rC4a (ED50 = 8.7 ± 0.52 nM). Cells transfected with the cDNA for the gpC3aR or Gα-16 alone did not respond to any of the peptides tested (data not shown).

  FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

Calcium mobilization dose response curves of HEK-293 cells transiently expressing Gα-16 and the gpC3aR (A) or the huC3aR (B) to a stimulus of C3a (circles), (W63,W64)C3a(63-77) (squares), rC4a (diamonds), or rC5a (triangles). Concentration response curves for each agonist were run on six individual plates using FLIPR in two individual experiments. Values presented are the mean ± SEM.

In marked contrast to the results obtained with rC4a on cells expressing the gpC3aR, cells transiently expressing the huC3aR did not respond to rC4a concentrations as high as 1 μM, but did respond to C3a (ED50 = 0.36 ± 0.07 nM) and the C3a peptide (ED50 = 3.1 ± 0.3 nM; Fig 4⇑B). Previously, comparable results were obtained with stable cell lines expressing the cloned huC3aR (13). The gpC3aR and huC3aR responded differently to human rC4a as well as to the C3a synthetic peptide, which was virtually equipotent with C3a vs the gpC3aR but approximately an order of magnitude less potent than C3a vs the huC3aR. This may not be an unexpected result, as the biological assay originally used to characterize this “superagonist” C3a analogue peptide were all performed on guinea pig cells (14). Minimal activity was noted with rC5a on cells expressing either the gpC3aR or huC3aR, but only at supramicromolar concentrations (ED50 > 10 μM).

These data confirm that the receptor naturally expressed on guinea pig platelets is promiscuous with respect to human C3a and rC4a, and they extend these observations to demonstrate that both anaphylatoxins are also potent agonists of the cloned gpC3aR. In contrast, rC4a is not active on the huC3aR or mouse C3aR (this study and 13 . The C3aR is a single-copy gene in man (19) and guinea pig (data not shown). Thus, human C4a cannot have a biologic effect in man that is mediated via the C3aR, whereas such a pathway apparently exists in guinea pigs. However, it remains to be determined whether gpC4a will also stimulate the gpC3aR.

Our data are difficult to reconcile with the findings of Murakami and coworkers who describe separate receptors for C3a and C4a on guinea pig macrophages (5), although these differences may result from the different reagents and assays used. While there are no additional reports describing a C4aR that is distinct from the C3aR, our data do not exclude such a possibility. Through an interaction with the C3aR, human C4a may function as an anaphylatoxin in guinea pigs, but not in mouse or man.

Acknowledgments

We thank D. Bitter-Suermann for his continuous support and helpful advice. The help of Katia Rech, Claudia Rheinheimer, C. Schiebl, and Kerstin Teschner is gratefully acknowledged.

Footnotes

  • ↵1 This work was supported by a grant from the Sonderforschungsbereich (SFB) 244 “Chronische Entzündung” to J.K. and W.B.

  • ↵2 Part of this work was presented at the 28th Annual Meeting of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Immunologie, Würzburg, Germany, 1997.

  • ↵3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Wilfried Bautsch, Institute of Medical Microbiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, D-30623 Hannover, Germany. E-mail address: Bautsch.Wilfried{at}MH-Hannover.de

  • ↵4 Abbreviations used in this paper: huC3aR, human C3a receptor; gp, guinea pig (i.e., gpC3aR); FLIPR, fluorometric imaging plate reader; c, concentration.

  • Received May 22, 1998.
  • Accepted June 30, 1998.
  • Copyright © 1998 by The American Association of Immunologists

References

  1. ↵
    Köhl, J., D. Bitter-Suermann. 1993. Anaphylatoxins. K. Whaley, and M. Loos, and J. M. Weiler, eds. Complement in Health and Disease 299 Kluwer Academic Publishers, Lancaster, U.K.
  2. ↵
    Ember, J. A., M. A. Jagels, T. E. Hugli. 1998. Characterization of complement anaphylatoxins and their biological responses. J. E. Volanakis, and M. M. Frank, eds. The Human Complement System in Health and Disease 241 Marcel Deccer, New York.
  3. ↵
    Gorski, J. P., T. E. Hugli, H.-J. Müller-Eberhard. 1979. C4a: the third anaphylatoxin of the human complement system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76: 5299
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Meuer, S., T. E. Hugli, R. H. Andreatta, U. Hadding, D. Bitter-Suermann. 1981. Comparative study on biological activities of various anaphylatoxins (C4a, C3a, C5a). Inflammation 5: 263
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    Murakami, Y., T. Yamamoto, T. Imamichi, S. Nagasawa. 1993. Cellular responses of guinea-pig macrophages to C4a: inhibition of C3a-induced O2-generation by C4a. Immunol. Lett. 36: 301
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Tsuruta, T., T. Yamamoto, S. Matsubara, S. Nagasawa, S. Tanase, J. Tanaka, K. Takagi, T. Kambara. 1993. Novel function of C4a anaphylatoxin: release from monocytes of protein which inhibits monocyte chemotaxis. Am. J. Pathol. 142: 1848
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    Hugli, T. E., M. S. Kawahara, C. G. Unson, R. Molinar-Rode, B. W. Erickson. 1983. The active site of human C4a anaphylatoxin. Mol. Immunol. 20: 637
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Roglic, A., E. R. Prossnitz, S. L. Cavanagh, Z. Pan, A. Zou, R. D. Ye. 1996. cDNA cloning of a novel G protein-coupled receptor with a large extracellular loop structure. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 1305: 39
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    Crass, T., U. Raffetseder, U. Martin, M. Grove, A. Klos, J. Köhl, W. Bautsch. 1996. Expression cloning of the human C3a anaphylatoxin receptor (C3aR) from differentiated U-937 cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 26: 1944
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Ames, R. S., Y. Li, H. M. Sarau, P. Nuthulaganti, J. J. Foley, C. Ellis, Z. Zeng, K. Su, A. J. Jurwicz, R. P. Hertzberg, D. J. Bergsma, C. Kumar. 1996. Molecular cloning and characterization of the human anaphylatoxin C3a receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 271: 20231
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Tornetta, M. A., J. J. Foley, H. M. Sarau, R. S. Ames. 1997. The mouse anaphylatoxin receptor: molecular cloning, genomic organization, and functional expression. J. Immunol. 158: 5277
    OpenUrlAbstract
  12. ↵
    Hsu, M. H., J. A. Ember, M. Wang, E. R. Prossnitz, T. E. Hugli, R. D. Ye. 1997. Cloning and functional characterization of the mouse C3a anaphylatoxin receptor gene. Immunogenetics 47: 64
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Ames, R. S., M. A. Tornetta, J. J. Foley, T. E. Hugli, H. M. Sarau. 1997. Evidence that the receptor for C4a is distinct from the C3a receptor. Immunopharmacology 38: 87
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Ember, J. A., N. L. Johansen, T. E. Hugli. 1991. Designing synthetic superagonists of C3a anaphylatoxin. Biochemistry 30: 3603
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Zanker, B., H. Rasokat, U. Hadding, D. Bitter-Suermann. 1982. C3a induced activation and stimulus specific reversible desensitization of guinea pig platelets. Agents Actions 11: 147
  16. ↵
    Bitter-Suermann, D., R. Burger. 1986. Guinea pigs deficient in C2, C4, C3 or the C3a receptor. Prog. Allergy 39: 139
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    Schroeder, K. S., B. D. Neagle. 1996. FLIPR: A new instrument for accurate high throughput optical screening. J. Biomol. Screening 1: 75
    OpenUrlAbstract
  18. ↵
    Didsbury, J. R., R. J. Uhing, E. Tomhave, C. Gerard, N. Gerard, R. Synderman. 1991. Receptor class desensitization of leukocyte chemoattractant receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88: 11564
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Paral, D., B. Sohns, T. Crass, M. Grove, J. Köhl, A. Klos, and W. Bautsch. 1998. Genomic organization of the human C3a receptor. Eur. J. Immunol. In press.
  20. ↵
    Fukuoka, Y., J. A. Ember, T. E. Hugli. 1998. Cloning and characterization of rat C3a receptor: differential expression of rat C3a and C5a receptors by LPS stimulation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 242: 663
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 161, Issue 5
1 Sep 1998
  • Table of Contents
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cutting Edge: Human Anaphylatoxin C4a Is a Potent Agonist of the Guinea Pig But Not the Human C3a Receptor
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Cutting Edge: Human Anaphylatoxin C4a Is a Potent Agonist of the Guinea Pig But Not the Human C3a Receptor
Stefan Lienenklaus, Robert S. Ames, Mark A. Tornetta, Henry M. Sarau, James J. Foley, Torsten Crass, Bettina Sohns, Ute Raffetseder, Melanie Grove, Anja Hölzer, Andreas Klos, Jörg Köhl, Wilfried Bautsch
The Journal of Immunology September 1, 1998, 161 (5) 2089-2093;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Cutting Edge: Human Anaphylatoxin C4a Is a Potent Agonist of the Guinea Pig But Not the Human C3a Receptor
Stefan Lienenklaus, Robert S. Ames, Mark A. Tornetta, Henry M. Sarau, James J. Foley, Torsten Crass, Bettina Sohns, Ute Raffetseder, Melanie Grove, Anja Hölzer, Andreas Klos, Jörg Köhl, Wilfried Bautsch
The Journal of Immunology September 1, 1998, 161 (5) 2089-2093;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results and Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Cutting Edge: T Cell Responses to B.1.1.529 (Omicron) SARS-CoV-2 Variant Induced by COVID-19 Infection and/or mRNA Vaccination Are Largely Preserved
  • Cutting Edge: SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Robust Germinal Center Activity in the Human Tonsil
  • Cutting Edge: Enhanced Antitumor Immunity in ST8Sia6 Knockout Mice
Show more CUTTING EDGE

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • FAR 889
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2022 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606