Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
      • Neuroimmunology: To Sense and Protect
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Cloning and Characterization of the Guinea Pig Eosinophil Eotaxin Receptor, C-C Chemokine Receptor-3: Blockade Using a Monoclonal Antibody In Vivo

Ian Sabroe, Dolores M. Conroy, Norma P. Gerard, You Li, Paul D. Collins, Theodore W. Post, Peter J. Jose, Timothy J. Williams, Craig J. Gerard and Paul D. Ponath
J Immunol December 1, 1998, 161 (11) 6139-6147;
Ian Sabroe
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dolores M. Conroy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Norma P. Gerard
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
You Li
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul D. Collins
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Theodore W. Post
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter J. Jose
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Timothy J. Williams
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Craig J. Gerard
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul D. Ponath
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Certain C-C chemokines, signaling via the eotaxin receptor C-C chemokine receptor-3 (CCR3), are thought to be central mediators of eosinophil accumulation in allergic inflammation. To investigate the role of CCR3 in vivo, we cloned the guinea pig eotaxin receptor (guinea pig CCR3) from a genomic DNA library. We isolated a single-exon open reading frame coding for a 358-amino acid chemokine receptor protein with 67 and 69% homology to human and murine CCR3, respectively. When expressed in stable transfectants, this receptor bound 125I-labeled guinea pig eotaxin, 125I-labeled human monocyte chemotactic protein-3, and 125I-labeled human RANTES. In chemotaxis assays, guinea pig CCR3 transfectants responded only to guinea pig eotaxin, with a maximal effect at 100 nM. mAbs were raised that bound selectively to both guinea pig CCR3 transfectants and guinea pig eosinophils. One of these mAbs, 2A8, blocked both ligand binding to transfectants and their chemotaxis in response to eotaxin. The Ab also inhibited chemotaxis and the elevation of cytosolic calcium in guinea pig eosinophils in response to eotaxin. F(ab′)2 fragments of 2A8 were prepared that retained the ability to inhibit eosinophil calcium responses to eotaxin. Pretreatment of 111In-labeled eosinophils in vitro with F(ab′)2 2A8 selectively inhibited their accumulation in response to eotaxin in vivo. These data demonstrate that functional blockade of eosinophil chemokine receptors can be achieved in vivo and provide further support for the development of novel anti-inflammatory drugs targeting eosinophil recruitment through chemokine receptor antagonism.

The acute asthmatic attack is associated with a marked recruitment of eosinophils into the lung. The subsequent activation of these eosinophils is thought to be a major contributor to the observed histopathologic features of lung damage such as epithelial shedding and to the underlying bronchial hyperreactivity that is a hallmark of asthma (1, 2, 3, 4).

Eosinophils accumulate from the microcirculation in response to locally generated chemoattractants. Several types of chemoattractants are active on eosinophils in vitro (4, 5), but in allergic inflammation in vivo a central role is emerging for the C-C class of chemokines, in particular eotaxin (6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12). Eotaxin was first identified as the major eosinophil chemoattractant present in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from a guinea pig model of allergic airway inflammation (6, 13), and using primers based initially on the guinea pig protein sequence, guinea pig (14, 15), murine (16), rat (17), and human eotaxin (8) have been cloned. In sensitized guinea pigs, the elevation in eotaxin concentrations in the lung tissue of allergen-challenged animals parallels the onset of eosinophil accumulation, and all the eosinophil chemoattractant activity in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid obtained 6 h after pulmonary allergen challenge is neutralized by an anti-eotaxin Ab (10).

Further studies have investigated in more detail the mechanisms of eosinophil accumulation in vivo, central to which is the generation of a blood eosinophilia (7). We have previously obtained evidence that effective eosinophil accumulation in response to local eotaxin generation in tissues is dependent upon the elevation of blood eosinophil levels, mediated by the actions of IL-5 to release a rapidly mobilizable bone marrow pool of eosinophils (7, 10). Recently, we have shown that eotaxin alone or acting in synergy with IL-5 can mobilize bone marrow eosinophils and their progenitors (18), supporting an important role for eotaxin in eosinophil recruitment acting through both local and remote pathways. Evidence is also accumulating for an important role for eotaxin in human disease. Eotaxin mRNA and protein are up-regulated in atopic asthma, and eotaxin contributes significantly to the eosinophil chemotactic activity present in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from asthmatic patients (19, 20, 21). Eotaxin has also been implicated in eosinophil accumulation in other human diseases (22).

Chemoattractants, including chemokines, signal through seven-transmembrane, G protein-coupled receptors (23, 24, 25, 26). Guinea pig eotaxin was originally shown to be a potent stimulator of both guinea pig and human eosinophils (6). Binding and desensitization studies with eotaxin and human RANTES (hRANTES)3 on human eosinophils predicted a common receptor for these chemokines (8). The human eotaxin receptor, C-C chemokine receptor-3 (CCR3), was subsequently cloned from eosinophil cDNA using primers and probes based upon the human CCR1 and other chemokine receptor sequences (27, 28). Murine CCR3 has been cloned and characterized using similar strategies (29, 30).

Studies using an anti-human CCR3 mAb have confirmed CCR3 to be the major eosinophil chemokine receptor in the majority of the human population (12, 27), although in some individuals, eosinophils also show potent responses to chemokines including hRANTES and MIP-1α via another receptor (Ref. 31 and I. Sabroe et al., unpublished data). Furthermore, eotaxin and its recently described functional homologue eotaxin-2 (32, 33) are unusual among C-C chemokines in that they show marked receptor selectivity, signaling only via CCR3 (8, 28, 32, 33). In humans, CCR3 is also expressed on basophils (34) and some Th2 cells (35, 36, 37, 38), supporting an important role for CCR3 signaling pathways in allergic inflammation.

Blockade of CCR3 may therefore provide an effective therapy in the treatment of allergic diseases including asthma, and the development of CCR3 antagonists has been identified as a major therapeutic target (39). To understand better the role of eotaxin and its receptor in allergic inflammation, we have cloned and characterized the guinea pig eotaxin receptor, guinea pig CCR3. We have produced a blocking mAb to this receptor and demonstrate its ability to block the actions of eotaxin on eosinophils in vivo.

Materials and Methods

Materials

The Dunkin-Hartley guinea pig liver genomic DNA library in EMBL3A was purchased from Stratagene Cloning Systems (La Jolla, CA). 125I-labeled human monocyte chemotactic protein (hMCP)-3 and 125I-labeled hRANTES (each 2200 Ci/mmol) were from New England Nuclear (Boston, MA). Cell culture media and reagents including RPMI 1640, HEPES, FCS, sodium bicarbonate, sodium pyruvate, 2-ME, and geneticin (G418) were obtained from Life Technologies (Paisley, U.K.). Percoll, BSA, and general laboratory reagents were obtained from Sigma (Poole, U.K.). Restriction enzymes were purchased from Boehringer Mannheim (Indianapolis, IN). Human IL-8 was produced in Escherichia coli as described (40). Human eotaxin was purified from Sf-9 insect cell culture supernatants infected with a recombinant eotaxin baculovirus obtained using the Bac-to-Bac baculovirus expression system (Life Technologies). All other chemokines other than those below were from Peprotech EC, (London, U.K.). The following were generous gifts. Synthetic guinea pig eotaxin was from B. Guarino, G. Andrews, and H. Showell (Pfizer, Groton, CT). Recombinant human C5a (rhC5a) was from Dr. J. van Oostrum (Ciba-Geigy, Summit, NJ). ENA-2 anti-human E-selectin F(ab′)2 fragments were from Dr. M. Robinson (Celltech Therapeutics, Slough, U.K.). The murine pre-B cell line L1.2 was from Dr. E. Butcher (Stanford University, Stanford, CA).

Isolation of guinea pig CCR3 genomic bacteriophage clones

Guinea pig CCR3 DNA clones were isolated by screening 5 × 105 plaque-forming units of the guinea pig genomic DNA library using 32P-labeled human (27) and mouse (29) CCR3 cDNA sequences as probes. Plaques showing hybridization to both probes under high stringency wash conditions were purified, and restriction fragments of phage DNA with homology to the CCR3 probes were subcloned into pBluescript SK+ (Stratagene) and sequenced (Sequenase; Amersham Life Science, Cleveland, OH). A 1.1-kb single-exon open reading frame was identified, subcloned by PCR into the expression vector pcDNA3 (Invitrogen Corp., San Diego, CA) incorporating a 5′ BamHI and a 3′ XbaI linker, and resequenced to confirm PCR fidelity. The PCR N- and C-terminal primers for this reaction were as follows: GPCKR3/1, 5′-CGG GAT CCC GCC AGT GGC ATG GCG C-3′, and GPCKR3/2, 5′-GCT CTA GAG CCC TCG AGG TCG ACC-3′.

Generation of a guinea pig CCR3-expressing stable cell line

Twenty micrograms of the CCR3/pcDNA3 construct were linearized by digestion with Bsm1 (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) and used to transfect L1.2 cells as follows. Twenty five million cells were washed twice and resuspended in 0.8 ml of PBS. The cells were incubated for 10 min at room temperature with the linearized CCR3/pcDNA3 construct DNA and transferred to a 0.4-cm cuvette, and a single electroporation pulse was applied at 250 V, 960 μF. Electroporated cells were incubated for 10 min at room temperature and transferred to culture at 37°C in RPMI supplemented with 10% FCS. Geneticin (G418) was added to a final concentration of 800 μg/ml 48 h posttransfection, and the cells were plated in 96-well plates at 25,000 cells/well. After 2–3 wk under drug selection, geneticin-resistant cells were assessed for their ability to migrate to 100 nM guinea pig eotaxin in a Transwell (Costar, Cambridge MA) chemotaxis assay (8). Lines with robust migration were cloned by limiting dilution and rescreened for their ability to bind 125I-labeled hMCP-3 (described below) and their ability to migrate to guinea pig eotaxin.

Purification of guinea pig leukocytes

Guinea pigs (400–450 g) were humanely killed by the administration of an overdose of sodium pentobarbitone i.p. (May and Baker, Oxford, U.K.), and blood was taken by cardiac puncture into 10 mM EDTA. For some experiments, guinea pigs were pretreated with 1 μg/kg recombinant human IL-5 i.v. 90 min before euthanasia. The whole blood was spun at 260 × g for 20 min and the plasma discarded. Dextran (5 ml; 9% in normal saline) and 20 ml of normal saline were added per 15 ml of the buffy coat/erythrocyte cell pellet and gently mixed, and the erythrocytes were allowed to sediment over 30 min. The leukocyte-rich suspension was harvested, and the leukocytes were pelleted by centrifugation. The mononuclear cells and polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNLs, comprising eosinophils and neutrophils) were separated over a two-layer 70%/80% discontinuous PBS/Percoll gradient centrifuged at 400 × g for 25 min. Contaminating erythrocytes were removed by hypotonic shock lysis (41). The cells were washed in the appropriate assay buffer and counted using Kimura’s stain.

Chemotaxis assays

Chemotaxis experiments with L1.2 cells or L1.2 receptor transfectant cell lines were performed using Transwell tissue culture inserts (Costar) as described (8).

For guinea pig leukocyte chemotaxis, PMNLs were prepared from IL-5-treated animals as above, and the chemotaxis assay was performed as described (18). Briefly, aliquots of 5 × 105 PMNLs (containing 18% ± 3.2% (SD) eosinophils) were pretreated in 100 μl of buffer (RPMI 1640 containing 20 mM HEPES and 0.25% BSA) with or without Ab for 10 min at room temperature. The cells were transferred to Transwell inserts within 24-well tissue culture plates containing 400 μl of buffer, guinea pig eotaxin, or rhC5a per well. The plates were incubated for 1 h at 37°C, and the chemotactic responses were determined using FACS analysis to measure the eosinophil recruitment to the lower chamber, as described previously (18).

Radiolabeled ligand binding assays

Chemokine binding studies of transfected cells using 0.1 nM 125I-labeled hMCP-3 or 0.1 nM 125I-labeled hRANTES as the ligand were performed using a modified method previously reported (8). Briefly, cells were washed once in PBS and resuspended in buffer (1 × 107 cells/ml in PBS with 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5; 1 mM CaCl2; 5 mM MgCl2; 0.5% BSA; and 0.05% azide). Aliquots of 50 μl (5 × 105 cells) were dispensed into 1.5-ml Eppendorf tubes, followed by the addition of cold competitor and radiolabeled chemokines as indicated. The final reaction volume was 200 μl. Nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of 500 nM unlabeled MCP-3. After a 60-min incubation at 37°C, the cells were washed twice with 200 μl of buffer containing 0.5 M NaCl. Cell pellets were then counted. The data are presented as the percentage of specific binding calculated according to the formula 100 × (S − B)/(T − B), where S is the radioactivity of the sample, B is background nonspecific binding, and T is total binding without competitors. Duplicates were used throughout the experiments, and the SDs were always less than 10% of the mean. All experiments were repeated at least three times. Curve fit was calculated by KaleidaGraph software (Synergy Software, Reading, PA). In some experiments, binding of 125I-labeled hMCP-3 and 125I-labeled hRANTES was performed in the RPMI-based buffer as used for chemotaxis assays (see above).

Binding assays using 125I-labeled guinea pig eotaxin were performed using a modified previously described method (41). Briefly, guinea pig eotaxin was iodinated using the Iodogen (Pierce & Warriner, Chester, U.K.) method as described (6), with a specific activity of 195 Ci/mmol. Transfectants were incubated with 0.3 nM 125I-labeled guinea pig eotaxin in RPMI 1640 + 20 mM HEPES + 0.5% BSA + 0.05% sodium azide (pH 7.4) and varying concentrations of unlabeled chemokines (in a final volume of 50 μl) at room temperature for 60 min. Fifty microliters of assay buffer containing NaCl was added to a final concentration of 0.5 M NaCl, and the samples were mixed and layered onto tubes containing 150 μl of silicone oil. The cells were pelleted through the oil by centrifugation (13,000 × g for 5 min at 15°C). The cell pellet and supernatant were counted separately in a Canberra Packard Cobra 5010 gamma counter (Canberra Packard, Pangebourne, U.K.). Data are presented without the subtraction of nonspecific binding. Curve fits and calculation of ligand Kd were performed using MacLigand software (NIH version 4.92).

Measurement of cytosolic calcium in purified guinea pig eosinophils

Guinea pig peritoneal eosinophils were elicited in response to horse serum and purified over discontinuous Percoll gradients as previously described (5). Eosinophils (1 × 107/ml) were loaded with 1 μM fura 2 as previously described (41), washed in PBS + 0.1% BSA, and resuspended at a final concentration of 1 × 106 cells/ml in PBS + 0.25% BSA + 10 mM HEPES + 10 mM glucose. Aliquots of cells (2 ml) were dispensed into quartz cuvettes and equilibrated with 1 mM calcium at 37°C for 10 min before use. Changes in fluorescence were measured in a Perkin-Elmer (Norwalk, CT) LS-50 fluorescence spectrophotometer as previously described (41). Calculation of intracellular free calcium was derived from the fluorescence spectra (excitation wavelengths, 340 and 380 nm; emission wavelength, 510 nm) in accordance with established methods (41).

Generation of anti-guinea pig CCR3 receptor mAbs and flow cytometry

mAbs reactive with guinea pig CCR3 were generated by immunizing C57BL6 mice with 1–2 × 107 receptor transfectants i.p. six to eight times at 2-wk intervals. The final immunization was given i.v. Three days later, the spleen was removed and the splenic lymphocytes were fused with the SP2/0 cell line as described (27). Candidate anti-guinea pig CCR3 mAbs were initially identified by flow cytometry. Hybridoma supernatants were incubated with guinea pig CCR3 receptor transfectants and untransfected L1.2 cells, and bound Ab were detected using FITC-conjugated F(ab′)2 goat anti-mouse IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA). mAbs showing selectivity for guinea pig CCR3 transfectants were cloned by limiting dilution and rescreened against a panel of L1.2 cell chemokine receptor transfectants and guinea pig leukocytes. For flow cytometry of guinea pig leukocytes, 5 × 105 cells were incubated with mAbs in 100 μl of buffer (PBS containing 10 mM HEPES, 10 mM glucose, and 0.1% BSA) for 60 min on ice, washed twice (220 × g for 7 min), and incubated for 30 min on ice with FITC-conjugated F(ab′)2 goat anti-mouse IgG. The cells were washed once and resuspended in PBS before FACS analysis.

Generation of F(ab′)2 fragments of mAb 2A8

For use in vivo, F(ab′)2 fragments of mAb 2A8 were generated by TSD BioServices (Germantown, NY) as follows. The 2A8 (IgG2a) Ab was first purified from cell culture supernatant by passage over a protein A-Sepharose column (Pharmacia) and elution of Ab with 20 mM sodium acetate, pH 4.0. F(ab′)2 fragments were prepared from the Ab by digestion with immobilized pepsin (Pierce and Warriner, Chester, U.K.) and purified from Fc by protein A chromatography. The final product contained <3.0 endotoxin units (EU) of endotoxin/mg.

Inhibition of 111In-labeled eosinophil accumulation by mAb pretreatment in vivo

Eosinophils from four donor animals were purified over discontinuous Percoll gradients, pooled, and labeled with 111InCl3 as previously described (5). The radiolabeled eosinophils were divided into two aliquots and pretreated with either a control F(ab′)2 Ab (ENA2, anti-human E selectin; 100 μg/ml) or 100 μg/ml 2A8 F(ab′)2 in buffer (HBSS + 0.25% BSA + 30 mM HEPES) for 10 min at room temperature. The cells were washed and injected i.v. via an ear vein into sedated recipient animals (2.5 × 106 cells/animal, with four animals receiving control F(ab′)2 Ab-treated cells and four animals receiving anti-guinea pig CCR3 2A8 F(ab′)2 Ab-treated cells). Five minutes later, test agents (in 100 μl) were injected intradermally into the shaved dorsal skin of the recipients in a randomized pattern. After 2 h, the recipients were humanely killed. Blood was taken by cardiac puncture for calculation of circulating eosinophil numbers, the back skin of the animals was removed, and the skin sites were punched out and counted in a Cobra 5010 gamma counter. Results are expressed as the calculated number of 111In-labeled eosinophils accumulating per site according to established protocols (5, 6).

Results

Cloning of the guinea pig CCR3 receptor

Two clones from the guinea pig genomic library showing homology to both human and murine CCR3 probe sequences were selected for further investigation and were found to contain the same sequence; one clone alone contained the complete open reading frame. Analysis of the open reading frame showed it to encode a G protein-coupled seven-transmembrane receptor with 67 and 69% homologies to human and murine CCR3, respectively (Fig. 1⇓). The predicted protein sequence contained the familiar amino acid motif, DRYLAIV, a highly conserved chemokine receptor amino acid sequence across both receptor types and animal species. Similarly to human CCR3, and in contrast to many other human chemokine receptors (including CCR1, CCR2, CCR4, CXCR1, and CXCR2), the N-terminus of the guinea pig receptor lacks sites for N-linked glycosylation. In common with other C-C and C-X-C chemokine receptors, the sequence contains a serine- and a threonine-rich C terminus, sites that are likely to be important in receptor regulation through phosphorylation by G protein receptor kinases (41, 42, 43). RT-PCR using specific primers for the guinea pig CCR3 sequence amplified a band of predicted size from mRNA purified from guinea pig peritoneal eosinophils (data not shown).

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Sequence of the guinea pig eotaxin receptor, guinea pig CCR3. A 1.1-kb sequence was isolated from a guinea pig genomic DNA library encoding a 358-amino acid protein with 67 and 69% homology to human and murine CCR3, respectively. The predicted protein sequence of the open reading frame is shown above, together with the sequences of human and murine CCR3, with human CCR1 and CCR2b for comparison. Residues showing homology with these comparative sequences are shown in boldface type. The sequence has been deposited in the GenBank database and assigned accession number AF060698.

Construction of guinea pig CCR3 stable transfectants and characterization of receptor ligand binding

Stable guinea pig CCR3 transfectants were generated and assessed for their ability to migrate in response to guinea pig eotaxin. Two cell lines showing robust chemotaxis to guinea pig eotaxin (2A1 and 4B4) were further characterized for their ability to bind radiolabeled chemokines. Cell lines 2A1 and 4B4 showed identical ligand binding profiles, and therefore only data from the 4B4 line are shown here.

The 4B4 cells bound 125I-labeled guinea pig eotaxin (Fig. 2⇓a), which was displaced by unlabeled guinea pig eotaxin in a concentration-dependent fashion. In previous studies using guinea pig eosinophils, binding of 125I-labeled guinea pig eotaxin was displaced both by hMCP-3 and hRANTES as well as guinea pig eotaxin (44). In keeping with these data, 4B4 cells, but not their untransfected parent cell line, also bound 125I-labeled hMCP-3 (Fig. 2⇓, a and b) and 125I-labeled hRANTES (Fig. 2⇓b). Scatchard analysis of the binding data indicated dissociation constants (Kd) of 3.0 nM for hMCP-3 (Fig. 2⇓a) and 4.5 nM for guinea pig eotaxin (mean of three experiments; data not shown), with a mean receptor density of 47,000 receptors per cell (Fig. 2⇓a).

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

a, The ligand binding of the guinea pig CCR3 stable transfectant cell line 4B4. i, Transfectants were incubated with 0.3 nM 125I-labeled guinea pig eotaxin and varying concentrations of unlabeled guinea pig eotaxin. After washing, the transfectant cell pellets were counted in a gamma counter, and the results are presented as a percentage of maximum binding. All experiments were performed in triplicate, and data shown are the means ± SEM of three or four experiments. ** signifies p < 0.01, and *** signifies p < 0.001 (both significant competitions; ANOVA and Bonferroni’s post test). ii, Competition of 0.1 nM 125I-labeled hMCP-3 binding by increasing concentrations of unlabeled ligand. Inset, Scatchard transformation of the data, calculation of which showed a receptor density of 47,000 receptors/cell with a Kd of 3.0 nM. Data are from a representative experiment (duplicates ± SD) of two to four experiments. b, Competition of binding of 125I-labeled guinea pig eotaxin, 125I-labeled hMCP-3, and 125I-labeled hRANTES to 4B4 cell transfectants. Transfectants were incubated with 0.3 nM 125I-labeled guinea pig eotaxin (i) or 0.1-nM concentrations of 125I-labeled hMCP-3 (ii) and 125I-labeled hRANTES (iii) and 100-nM concentrations of the unlabeled chemokines indicated. After washing, the transfectant cell pellets were counted in a gamma counter; ligand binding is displayed as a percentage of maximum specific binding. i, Data are the means from three or four experiments ± SEM. ii and iii, Data are from a representative experiment (duplicates ± SD) of two to four experiments. c, Chemotactic responses of the guinea pig CCR3 transfectant cell line. 4B4 cell transfectants were placed in Transwell cell culture inserts and incubated at 37°C in 24-well plates containing buffer or varying concentrations of guinea pig, human, and murine eotaxin; hMCP-3; hMCP-4; and human IL-8 as indicated. The chemotactic responses of the transfectants in response to these chemokines were measured by flow cytometry. Guinea pig eotaxin alone induced a chemotactic response that was maximal at 100 nM. No other tested agonist induced a chemotactic response, and these symbols overlap on the baseline. Data shown are from a representative experiment ± SD, which was repeated three times.

Binding of 125I-labeled guinea pig eotaxin, 125I-labeled hMCP-3, and 125I-labeled hRANTES was displaced by an excess of unlabeled guinea pig eotaxin or hMCP-3 (Fig. 2⇑b). hRANTES failed to compete for 125I-labeled guinea pig eotaxin or 125I-labeled hMCP-3 binding in these experiments using the buffers described. However, when 125I-labeled hMCP-3 binding studies were performed in the RPMI buffer used in transfectant cell chemotaxis assays, 100 nM hRANTES competed for 53% of 0.1 nM 125I-labeled hMCP-3 binding to 4B4 cells (data not shown).

To evaluate ligand specificity further, we tested the chemotactic responses of the 4B4 cell line to the chemokines used in the radiolabeled ligand binding assays. Human IL-8 was included as a negative control. Untransfected L1.2 cells were unresponsive to all chemokines tested (Ref. 27 and data not shown). Fig. 2⇑c shows that only guinea pig eotaxin was able to induce a chemotactic response in the receptor transfectants, producing a characteristic bell-shaped dose-response profile with a peak response at 100 nM. This profile is similar to that found for human eotaxin acting on human CCR3 transfectants (27). Despite the similar Kds of hMCP-3 and guinea pig eotaxin for guinea pig CCR3, hMCP-3 was unable to induce a chemotactic signal at concentrations up to 500 nM.

Development of mAbs to guinea pig CCR3

Previous studies with a blocking mAb to human CCR3 have demonstrated the importance of this receptor in chemokine-induced chemotactic responses of eosinophils in vitro (12). This mAb does not cross-react with guinea pig CCR3 on either transfectants or guinea pig eosinophils, and therefore a panel of anti-guinea pig CCR3 mAbs was generated to explore the in vivo relevance of CCR3 in well characterized guinea pig models of allergic inflammation (6, 7, 10). Following the first fusion, 1000 hybridomas were generated, and two Abs, 1C3 and 2A8, were isolated. Both mAbs bound to guinea pig CCR3 transfectants and showed minor cross-reactivity with the human CCR3 transfectant cell line (data not shown). Neither Ab stained a murine CCR3 transfectant or any other human CCR (1, 2, 4, 5) or CXCR (1, 2, 3) transfectant tested (data not shown). The specificity of Abs 1C3 and 2A8 for guinea pig leukocytes was therefore investigated, and Fig. 3⇓ shows that these Abs bound selectively to guinea pig eosinophils in PMNL populations purified from blood. There was no detectable binding of either 1C3 or 2A8 to guinea pig blood neutrophils (Fig. 3⇓), monocytes, or lymphocytes as determined by flow cytometry (data not shown), in keeping with the previously described expression patterns of human CCR3 (27). A second fusion and round of hybridoma formation resulted in the identification of four further anti-guinea pig CCR3 mAbs with binding characteristics identical to those of 1C3 and 2A8 (data not shown).

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Binding of anti-guinea pig CCR3 mAbs 1C3 and 2A8 to guinea pig leukocytes. Guinea pig PMNLs (comprising eosinophils and neutrophils) were incubated with purified 1C3 and 2A8 IgG (10 μg/ml). The cells were washed and incubated with FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary Abs. Following one further wash, the presence of bound Ab was detected by flow cytometry. A, Separation of guinea pig eosinophils and neutrophils in PMNL populations according to their light-scatter characteristics on FACS analysis. Both Abs bound to eosinophils (B), and neither Ab bound to neutrophils (C).

Blockade of ligand binding and chemotactic responses of guinea pig CCR3 transfectants by anti-guinea pig CCR3 mAbs

To investigate the potential of the anti-guinea pig CCR3 mAbs to block ligand binding, the 4B4 cell line stable guinea pig CCR3 transfectants were pretreated with mAb 1C3 or 2A8, and the subsequent binding of 125I-labeled hMCP-3 was determined. Pretreatment of transfectants with mAb 2A8 blocked 125I-labeled hMCP-3 binding to transfectants in a concentration-dependent manner; in contrast, mAb 1C3 did not inhibit ligand binding at any concentration tested (Fig. 4⇓). The binding characteristics of guinea pig CCR3 deduced from Fig. 2⇑, a and b, and Ref. 44 predict that guinea pig eotaxin and hMCP-3 share a common binding site on guinea pig CCR3. Accordingly, pretreatment with 2A8 also blocked chemotaxis of the guinea pig CCR3 transfectants to guinea pig eotaxin in a concentration-dependent manner, at similar concentrations to those needed to inhibit 125I-labeled hMCP-3 binding (Fig. 4⇓). Pretreatment of cells with the mAb 1C3 did not inhibit chemotaxis.

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

Inhibition of 4B4 cell transfectant ligand binding and chemotaxis by pretreatment with mAb 2A8. In binding studies, Ab-pretreated cells were incubated with 0.1 nM 125I-labeled hMCP-3, and the cell pellets were counted in a gamma counter. In chemotaxis assays, Ab-pretreated cells were placed in Transwell cell culture inserts and incubated at 37°C in 24-well plates containing guinea pig eotaxin. The chemotactic responses of the transfectants were measured by flow cytometry (cells/30 s). The Ab 2A8, but not mAb 1C3, inhibited both ligand binding and chemotaxis at similar concentrations. Data shown are representative of at least three (inhibition of chemotaxis) and two (inhibition of radioligand binding) experiments.

Blockade of guinea pig eotaxin signaling on guinea pig eosinophils by mAb 2A8

mAb 2A8 bound specifically to both guinea pig CCR3 transfectants and guinea pig eosinophils and blocked both ligand binding and chemotactic responses of guinea pig CCR3 transfectants. Therefore, the ability of 2A8 to block the in vitro responses of guinea pig eosinophils to guinea pig eotaxin was investigated using assays of chemotaxis and intracellular calcium flux. Pretreatment with 2A8 (10 μg/ml) of PMNLs purified from the blood of IL-5-treated guinea pigs caused a potent inhibition of eosinophil chemotaxis in response to guinea pig eotaxin but had no effect on the eosinophil chemotactic response to rhC5a (Fig. 5⇓). In the same cell populations, guinea pig neutrophils showed a chemotactic response to rhC5a, but not to guinea pig eotaxin, and this was not inhibited by 2A8 pretreatment (data not shown).

FIGURE 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5.

Inhibition of guinea pig eosinophil chemotactic and cytosolic calcium responses to eotaxin by pretreatment with mAb 2A8. Guinea pig PMNLs purified from the blood of IL-5-treated donor animals were pretreated for 10 min with 2A8 (10 μg/ml) or buffer and were placed in Transwell cell culture inserts, which were incubated for 1 h at 37°C in 24-well plates containing guinea pig eotaxin (30 nM) or rhC5a (3 nM). The chemotactic responses of the leukocytes in response to these agonists were measured by flow cytometry (top). Pretreatment of the cells with 2A8 inhibited the chemotactic response to guinea pig eotaxin (*p < 0.05, ANOVA and Bonferroni’s post test) but not to rhC5a. Data shown are the means of four experiments ± SEM. In the lower panels, purified eosinophils were loaded with fura 2, and their intracellular calcium responses to guinea pig eotaxin were determined in the presence of buffer, 2A8 (12 μg/ml), and 1C3 (12 μg/ml). mAb 2A8 completely inhibited the guinea pig eosinophil calcium response to eotaxin.

To investigate further the blocking efficacy of 2A8 on guinea pig CCR3-mediated signaling in guinea pig eosinophils, elicited eosinophils were loaded with fura 2, and their intracellular calcium response to guinea pig eotaxin was tested. Fig. 5⇑ shows that mAb 2A8 (12 μg/ml) completely blocked the calcium signal in response to 3 nM guinea pig eotaxin. In contrast, mAb 1C3 had no effect on the calcium flux induced by guinea pig eotaxin at the same concentration.

Blockade of guinea pig eosinophil CCR3 signaling by F(ab′)2 fragments of mAb 2A8

In pilot experiments, i.v. administration of mAb 2A8 (1 mg/kg) to guinea pigs caused a rapid clearance of eosinophils from the circulation (data not shown), possibly mediated through nonspecific interactions of the Fc portion of the mAb. Therefore, for the use of 2A8 as a blocking anti-guinea pig CCR3 Ab in vivo, F(ab′)2 fragments of 2A8 were prepared. Fig. 6⇓ shows that 2A8 F(ab′)2 fragments (30 μg/ml) bound to eosinophils similarly to whole Ab (10 μg/ml). 2A8 F(ab′)2 fragments (30 μg/ml) retained their ability to inhibit the eosinophil cytosolic calcium response to 3 nM guinea pig eotaxin but did not inhibit responses to rhC5a, used as a control to show that the eosinophil responses to other ligands were not blocked (Fig. 6⇓). Surprisingly, the results shown in Fig. 6⇓ also suggest that guinea pig eotaxin partially desensitized the calcium response to rhC5a and that the blockade of eotaxin-induced responses by 2A8 pretreatment prevented this heterologous desensitization of the rhC5a response. Previous studies have found little evidence of heterologous desensitization of chemoattractant signaling in human eosinophils (45). This is in contrast to the patterns of heterologous desensitization observed in human neutrophils, in which C5a is a potent desensitizer of responses to chemokines, but C5a responses are not readily desensitized by chemokines (41, 45, 46).

FIGURE 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 6.

2A8 F(ab′)2 binds to guinea pig eosinophils and inhibits cytosolic calcium responses induced by guinea pig eotaxin. 2A8 IgG (10 μg/ml) and F(ab′)2 2A8 (10 and 30 μg/ml) were incubated with guinea pig PMNLs for 60 min on ice, the cells were washed, and the presence of bound Ab was detected by flow cytometry after incubation of the cells with FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary Abs. Eosinophils and neutrophils were separated according to their light scatter characteristics (Fig. 3⇑). 2A8 bound, as whole molecules and F(ab′)2 fragments, to guinea pig eosinophils but not to neutrophils. Binding of F(ab′)2 fragments at a concentration of 30 μg/ml was similar to that obtained for whole IgG binding at a concentration of 10 μg/ml. Purified eosinophils were loaded with fura 2, and their calcium response to guinea pig eotaxin was determined in the presence of F(ab′)2 fragments of 2A8 (0, 10, and 30 μg/ml). There was a concentration-dependent inhibition of the intracellular calcium response to eotaxin by pretreatment of cells with F(ab′)2 fragments of 2A8 that was associated with an apparent enhancement of the subsequent calcium response to rhC5a used as a positive control for cell responses.

Blockade of 111In-labeled eosinophil accumulation in vivo by mAb 2A8

In contrast to unfragmented 2A8 IgG, F(ab′)2 2A8 did not result in any clearance of circulating eosinophils when administered i.v. to guinea pigs at a dose of 1 mg/kg (data not shown). Eosinophils were labeled with 111In and pretreated with 100 μg/ml concentrations of either a control F(ab′)2 mAb (ENA-2, anti-human E selectin) or F(ab′)2 2A8 as described in Materials and Methods. The cells were washed to remove unbound Ab and injected i.v. into recipient animals. Buffer, guinea pig eotaxin, or leukotriene B4 (LTB4) was then injected intradermally into the recipients, and the local accumulation of circulating radiolabeled eosinophils was allowed to proceed for 2 h. Fig. 7⇓ shows that pretreatment of eosinophils with F(ab′)2 fragments of 2A8 significantly inhibited the dermal accumulation of eosinophils in response to eotaxin, but not in response to LTB4. There was no significant difference in circulating 111In-labeled eosinophil numbers between control and 2A8-treated groups (14.7% ± 2.35% (SD) for ENA-2-pretreated cell recipients vs 10.1% ± 4.28% for 2A8-pretreated cell recipients).

FIGURE 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 7.

Inhibition of eosinophil accumulation in vivo by pretreatment with F(ab′)2 fragments of 2A8. Purified eosinophils were labeled with 111In and pretreated with 100 μg/ml F(ab′)2 fragments of 2A8 or control Ab. After washing to remove unbound Ab, the cells were injected i.v. into eight recipients (four per Ab). Duplicate injections of buffer, guinea pig eotaxin, or LTB4 were performed intradermally in the recipients in a randomized pattern. Two hours later, the animals were humanely killed, and the skin sites were punched out and counted in a gamma counter to determine the number of 111In-labeled eosinophils accumulating per skin site. * signifies p < 0.05 (significant difference between control F(ab′)2 fragment-treated cells and 2A8 F(ab′)2 fragment-treated cells; ANOVA and Bonferroni’s post test).

Discussion

The potent eosinophil chemoattractant eotaxin was first isolated as a protein present in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid taken from a guinea pig model of allergic inflammation (6, 10). More recent studies in mice and humans have emphasized the role of this C-C chemokine, acting specifically on the CCR3 receptor, in mediating eosinophil accumulation (11, 16, 19, 21, 22, 30). CCR3 also functions as a coreceptor for HIV and may be particularly important in aspects of the pathology of AIDS such as HIV encephalopathy (47, 48). To understand further the roles of eotaxin and its receptor CCR3 in allergic inflammation, we have cloned and characterized guinea pig CCR3 and produced blocking mAbs that are effective in vivo.

Simultaneous screening of a guinea pig genomic DNA library with human and murine CCR3 cDNA probes identified a clone with homology to both these sequences. The DNA contained a single exon open reading frame coding for a G protein-coupled receptor with highest homology to human and murine CCR3 (67 and 69%, respectively).

When stably expressed in L1.2 cells, the receptor bound 125I-labeled guinea pig eotaxin with high affinity (Kd 4.5 nM). The binding of radiolabeled ligand was effectively displaced both by unlabeled guinea pig eotaxin and hMCP-3. Human eotaxin was also able to displace 40% of the binding of 125I-labeled guinea pig eotaxin from the guinea pig CCR3 transfectants. The binding of 125I-labeled guinea pig eotaxin to guinea pig eosinophils has been shown to be competed by excess unlabeled guinea pig eotaxin, hMCP-3, and hRANTES (44). Indeed, hMCP-3 and hRANTES are antagonists of guinea pig eotaxin at this receptor in vitro, and hRANTES has been exploited as a prototypic receptor antagonist in vivo (44). In keeping with these data, the 4B4 cell stable guinea pig CCR3 transfectants also bound 125I-labeled hMCP-3 and 125I-labeled hRANTES. Binding of these ligands was effectively competed by an excess of unlabeled guinea pig eotaxin, indicating that they shared a common binding site on guinea pig CCR3.

125I-labeled hMCP-3 (available at a specific activity 11 times higher than that of 125I-labeled guinea pig eotaxin) was used to determine accurately guinea pig CCR3 expression levels on the transfectants and to verify the Kd. These studies demonstrated a mean receptor density on the 4B4 cells of 47,000 receptors per cell (Kd 3.0 nM), in keeping with expression levels previously observed for other chemokine receptors using this expression system (27).

The binding of ligands to human CCR3 is very susceptible to minor variations in local buffer conditions (49). In our experiments, competition of ligand binding to stable guinea pig CCR3 transfectants (4B4 cells) was also partly influenced by the buffer (either a PBS-based or RPMI-based buffer) in which the binding studies were performed. In particular, competition of radiolabeled ligand binding to guinea pig CCR3 transfectants by unlabeled hRANTES was more dependent upon local conditions than the other ligands tested. 125I-labeled hRANTES bound to the 4B4 cells in both the PBS-based and the RPMI-based buffers (Fig. 2⇑b and data not shown), and this binding was displaced by unlabeled guinea pig eotaxin, hRANTES, and hMCP-3. However, displacement of 125I-labeled guinea pig eotaxin and 125I-labeled hMCP-3 binding to the 4B4 cell line by unlabeled hRANTES was not observed (Fig. 2⇑, a and b). When 125I-labeled hMCP-3 binding studies were then performed in the RPMI-based buffer (vs the PBS-based buffer used in the initial experiments), 53% displacement of 125I-labeled hMCP-3 by hRANTES was demonstrated. These variations in excess unlabeled hRANTES competition may also be partly explained by the tendency of this chemokine to become extensively aggregated at physiologic pH (50).

Of those ligands showing binding to guinea pig CCR3, only guinea pig eotaxin caused a functional response in the stably transfected 4B4 cell line. Chemotaxis, which was maximal in response to 100 nM guinea pig eotaxin, occurred over a concentration range similar to that seen with other L1.2 cell stable transfectants and their respective ligands (27). Guinea pig eotaxin is the only known native ligand for guinea pig CCR3. In particular, guinea pig RANTES has been cloned but has been shown to be active on guinea pig macrophages and not on guinea pig eosinophils (51).

To allow the investigation of the role of CCR3 and its ligands in vivo, we raised mAbs against guinea pig CCR3. From a panel of mAbs that bound to stable guinea pig CCR3 transfectants but not the parental L1.2 cell line, two (1C3 and 2A8) were chosen for further investigation. Both Abs bound selectively to guinea pig CCR3 transfectants; there was minimal cross-reactivity only with transfectants expressing human CCR3. These Abs also bound with high affinity to guinea pig eosinophils, but not monocytes, lymphocytes, or neutrophils, in keeping with the known expression patterns of CCR3 on human leukocytes (12). The mAb 2A8 inhibited both the binding of 125I-labeled hMCP-3 to stable transfectants and their chemotactic response to guinea pig eotaxin, and similarly inhibited the chemotactic and intracellular calcium responses of guinea pig eosinophils to guinea pig eotaxin.

In humans, there is evidence that T lymphocytes cultured in cytokines resulting in a Th2-type phenotype express CCR3 (35, 36, 37, 38). CCR3+ lymphocytes in the circulation occur in very small numbers (35) and, even under stimulated Th2-type culture conditions, lymphocyte CCR3 expression may be at low levels compared with receptors such as CCR4 (37). It is possible that the numbers of T lymphocytes expressing CCR3 in either blood or bronchoalveolar lavage may be up-regulated in sensitized animals after allergen challenge, and this is a subject of further studies.

In preliminary experiments, we found that 2A8 IgG when injected i.v. into guinea pigs caused clearance of eosinophils from the circulation. Therefore, before in vivo investigation of the role of CCR3 by Ab-mediated receptor blockade, we prepared F(ab′)2 fragments of 2A8 to avoid possible Fc-mediated effects on eosinophil recruitment. These fragments retained their ability to block the guinea pig eosinophil responses to guinea pig eotaxin as determined in assays of intracellular calcium flux, with some reduction in potency, and had no effect on circulating eosinophil numbers.

To investigate the role of eosinophil CCR3 in the accumulation of eosinophils in response to chemokines, we pretreated 111In-labeled guinea pig eosinophils in vitro with control F(ab′)2 fragments or F(ab′)2 2A8 and examined their ability to accumulate in vivo in response to intradermal injections of guinea pig eotaxin and LTB4. Pretreatment of guinea pig eosinophils with F(ab′)2 2A8 selectively inhibited their accumulation in response to eotaxin but not to LTB4. Inhibition of eosinophil recruitment in response to intradermal eotaxin by F(ab′)2 2A8 was not complete. It is possible from the intradermal accumulation data alone to speculate the existence of a further functional guinea pig eotaxin receptor on guinea pig eosinophils that was not blocked by F(ab′)2 2A8 pretreatment. Insufficient F(ab′)2 2A8 was available to allow the coadministration of Ab i.v. with radiolabeled cells in sufficient concentration to block new or unblocked guinea pig CCR3 on circulating radiolabeled eosinophils and formally test this hypothesis. However, the existence of a second functional eotaxin receptor in the guinea pig would run counter to experience in all other species to date (52, 53, 54), and the in vitro data discussed above provide no support for the existence of a second functional eotaxin receptor on guinea pig eosinophils. This suggests that over the 2-h period during which the Ab-treated radiolabeled eosinophils circulated in vivo, there was either internalization of CCR3 with a subsequent reexpression of functional receptors not bound by 2A8 or some loss of F(ab′)2 2A8 from the cell surface.

In summary, we have cloned and sequenced the guinea pig eosinophil eotaxin receptor, guinea pig CCR3. We have characterized the ligand binding and signaling of this receptor and raised mAbs against it, one of which is a functional blocker of the receptor on guinea pig eosinophils in vitro. We have shown that pretreatment of guinea pig eosinophils with F(ab′)2 fragments of this Ab selectively inhibits eosinophil accumulation in response to guinea pig eotaxin in vivo, without affecting circulating eosinophil levels. Early evidence in vivo for the importance of chemoattractant receptors in leukocyte recruitment was provided by studies demonstrating the inhibition of neutrophil recruitment by pretreating cells with pertussis toxin (55). More recent studies have demonstrated that blockade of eosinophil CCR3 in the guinea pig using hRANTES can inhibit eosinophil accumulation in vivo (44). Similarly, methionine-RANTES has been shown to inhibit eosinophil accumulation in mice (56). The present study is the first to show inhibition of eosinophil accumulation in vivo by a specific Ab directed against a chemokine receptor. Abs to chemokine receptors will be valuable tools to analyze the component parts of different types of inflammatory reactions. Such Abs may prove to be efficacious in certain inflammatory diseases in humans and provide proof-of-principle data for the development of small-molecule chemokine receptor antagonists.

Acknowledgments

We thank Peter Barrett for technical assistance during receptor cloning.

Footnotes

  • ↵1 This work was supported by the Medical Research Council and the National Heart and Lung Institute/Royal Brompton Hospital Academic Initiative (I.S.), the European Commission (D.M.C.), the Wellcome Trust (P.D.C., P.J.J.), and the National Asthma Campaign (T.J.W.).

  • ↵2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Ian Sabroe, Leukocyte Biology Section, Biomedical Sciences Division, Sir Alexander Fleming Building, Imperial College School of Medicine, South Kensington, London SW7 2A2, U.K.

  • ↵3 Abbreviations used in this paper: h, human; CCR3, C-C chemokine receptor-3; MCP, monocyte chemotactic protein; rhC5a, recombinant human C5a; PMNL, polymorphonuclear leukocyte; LTB4, leukotriene B4.

  • Received April 23, 1998.
  • Accepted August 7, 1998.
  • Copyright © 1998 by The American Association of Immunologists

References

  1. ↵
    de Monchy, J. G. R., H. F. Kauffman, P. Venge, G. H. Koeter, H. M. Jansen, H. J. Sluiter, K. de Vries. 1985. Bronchoalveolar eosinophilia during allergen-induced late asthmatic reactions. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 131: 373
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    Bousquet, J., P. Chanez, J. Y. Lacoste, G. Brnéon, N. Ghavanian, I. Enanger, P. Venge, S. Ahlstedt, J. Simony-Lafontaine, P. Godard, F.-B. Michel. 1990. Eosinophilic inflammation in asthma. N. Engl. J. Med. 323: 1033
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Bradley, B. L., M. Azzawi, M. Jacobson, B. Assoufi, J. V. Collins, A. M. Irani, L. B. Schwartz, S. R. Durham, P. K. Jeffery, A. B. Kay. 1991. Eosinophils, T-lymphocytes, mast cells, neutrophils, and macrophages in bronchial biopsy specimens from atopic subjects with asthma: comparison with biopsy specimens from atopic subjects without asthma and normal control subjects and relationship to bronchial hyperresponsiveness. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 88: 661
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Kroegel, C., J. A. Warner, J.-C. Virchow, Jr, H. Matthys. 1994. Pulmonary immune cells in health and disease: the eosinophil leucocyte (Part II). Eur. Respir. J. 7: 743
    OpenUrlAbstract
  5. ↵
    Faccioli, L. H., S. Nourshargh, R. Moqbel, F. M. Williams, R. Sehmi, A. B. Kay, T. J. Williams. 1991. The accumulation of 111In-eosinophils induced by inflammatory mediators, in vivo. Immunology 73: 222
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    Jose, P. J., D. A. Griffiths-Johnson, P. D. Collins, D. T. Walsh, R. Moqbel, N. F. Totty, O. Truong, J. J. Hsuan, T. J. Williams. 1994. Eotaxin: a potent chemoattractant cytokine detected in a guinea-pig model of allergic airways inflammation. J. Exp. Med. 179: 881
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Collins, P. D., S. Marleau, D. A. Griffiths-Johnson, P. J. Jose, T. J. Williams. 1995. Cooperation between interleukin-5 and the chemokine eotaxin to induce eosinophil accumulation in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 182: 1169
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Ponath, P. D., S. Qin, D. J. Ringler, I. Clark-Lewis, J. Wang, N. Kassam, H. Smith, X. Shi, J.-A. Gonzalo, W. Newman, J.-C. Gutierrez-Ramos, C. R. Mackay. 1996. Cloning of the human eosinophil chemoattractant, eotaxin. J. Clin. Invest. 97: 604
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Gonzalo, J. A., G. Q. Jia, V. Aguirre, D. Friend, A. J. Coyle, N. A. Jenkins, G. S. Lin, H. Katz, A. Lichtman, N. Copeland, M. Kopf, J.-C. Gutierrez-Ramos. 1996. Mouse eotaxin expression parallels eosinophil accumulation during lung allergic inflammation but it is not restricted to a Th2-type response. Immunity 4: 1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Humbles, A. A., D. M. Conroy, S. Marleau, S. M. Rankin, R. T. Palframan, A. E. I. Proudfoot, T. N. C. Wells, D. Li, P. K. Jeffery, D. A. Griffiths-Johnson, T. J. Williams, P. J. Jose. 1997. Kinetics of eotaxin generation and its relationship to eosinophil accumulation in allergic airways disease: analysis in a guinea pig model in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 186: 601
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Rothenberg, M. E., J. A. MacLean, E. Pearlman, A. D. Luster, P. Leder. 1997. Targeted disruption of the chemokine eotaxin partially reduces antigen-induced tissue eosinophilia. J. Exp. Med. 185: 1
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Heath, H., S. Qin, P. Rao, L. Wu, G. LaRosa, N. Kassam, P. D. Ponath, C. R. Mackay. 1997. Chemokine receptor usage by eosinophils: the importance of CCR3 demonstrated using an antagonistic monoclonal antibody. J. Clin. Invest. 99: 178
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Griffiths-Johnson, D. A., P. D. Collins, A. G. Rossi, P. J. Jose, T. J. Williams. 1993. The chemokine, eotaxin, activates guinea-pig eosinophils in vitro and causes their accumulation into the lung in vivo. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 197: 1167
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Jose, P. J., I. M. Adcock, D. A. Griffiths-Johnson, N. Berkman, T. N. C. Wells, T. J. Williams, C. A. Power. 1994. Eotaxin: cloning of an eosinophil chemoattractant cytokine and increased mRNA expression in allergen-challenged guinea-pig lungs. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 205: 788
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Rothenberg, M. E., A. D. Luster, C. M. Lilly, J. M. Drazen, P. Leder. 1995. Constitutive and allergen-induced expression of eotaxin mRNA in the guinea pig lung. J. Exp. Med. 181: 1211
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Rothenberg, M. E., A. D. Luster, P. Leder. 1995. Murine eotaxin: an eosinophil chemoattractant inducible in endothelial cells and in interleukin 4-induced tumor suppression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 8960
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Williams, C. M. M., D. J. Newton, S. A. Wilson, T. J. Williams, J. W. Coleman, B. F. Flanagan. 1998. Conserved structure and tissue expression of rat eotaxin. Immunogenetics 47: 178
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Palframan, R. T., P. D. Collins, T. J. Williams, S. M. Rankin. 1998. Eotaxin induces a rapid release of eosinophils and their progenitors from the bone marrow. Blood 91: 2240
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Lamkhioued, B., P. M. Renzi, S. Abi-Younes, E. A. Garcia-Zepeda, Z. Allakhverdi, O. Ghaffar, M. D. Rothenberg, A. D. Luster, Q. Hamid. 1997. Increased expression of eotaxin in bronchoalveolar lavage and airways of asthmatics contributes to the chemotaxis of eosinophils to the site of inflammation. J. Immunol. 159: 4593
    OpenUrlAbstract
  20. ↵
    Mattoli, S., M. A. Stacey, G. Sun, A. Bellini, M. Marini. 1997. Eotaxin expression and eosinophilic inflammation in asthma. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 236: 299
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Ying, S., D. S. Robinson, Q. Meng, J. Rottman, R. Kennedy, D. J. Ringler, C. R. Mackay, B. L. Daugherty, M. S. Springer, S. R. Durham, T. J. Williams, A. B. Kay. 1997. Enhanced expression of eotaxin and CCR3 mRNA and protein in atopic asthma: association with airway hyperresponsiveness and predominant co-localization of eotaxin mRNA to bronchial epithelial and endothelial cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 27: 3507
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Garcia-Zepeda, E. A., M. E. Rothenberg, R. T. Ownbey, J. Celestin, P. Leder, A. D. Luster. 1996. Human eotaxin is a specific chemoattractant for eosinophil cells and provides a new mechanism to explain tissue eosinophilia. Nat. Med. 2: 449
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Gerard, N. P., C. Gerard. 1991. The chemotactic receptor for human C5a anaphylatoxin. Nature 349: 614
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Gerard, C., N. P. Gerard. 1994. The pro-inflammatory seven-transmembrane segment receptors of the leukocyte. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 6: 140
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Murphy, P. M.. 1996. Chemokine receptors: structure, function and role in microbial pathogenesis. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 7: 47
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Power, C. A., T. N. C. Wells. 1996. Cloning and characterization of human chemokine receptors. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 17: 209
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    Ponath, P. D., S. Qin, T. W. Post, J. Wang, L. Wu, N. P. Gerard, W. Newman, C. Gerard, C. R. Mackay. 1996. Molecular cloning and characterization of a human eotaxin receptor expressed selectively on eosinophils. J. Exp. Med. 183: 2437
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Daugherty, B. L., S. J. Siciliano, J. A. DeMartino, L. Malkowitz, A. Sirotina, M. S. Springer. 1996. Cloning, expression, and characterization of the human eosinophil eotaxin receptor. J. Exp. Med. 183: 2349
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    Post, T. W., C. R. Bozic, M. E. Rothenberg, A. D. Luster, N. Gerard, C. Gerard. 1995. Molecular characterization of two murine eosinophil β chemokine receptors. J. Immunol. 155: 5299
    OpenUrlAbstract
  30. ↵
    Gao, J.-L., A. I. Sen, M. Kitaura, O. Yoshie, M. E. Rothenberg, P. M. Murphy, A. D. Luster. 1996. Identification of a mouse eosinophil receptor for the CC chemokine eotaxin. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 223: 679
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. Rot, A., M. Krieger, T. Brunner, S. C. Bischoff, T. J. Schall, C. A. Dahinden. 1992. RANTES and macrophage inflammatory protein 1α induce the migration and activation of normal human eosinophil granulocytes. J. Exp. Med. 176: 1489
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    Forssmann, U., M. Uguccioni, P. Loetscher, C. A. Dahinden, H. Langen, M. Thelen, M. Baggiolini. 1997. Eotaxin-2, a novel CC chemokine that is selective for the chemokine receptor CCR3, and acts like eotaxin on human eosinophil and basophil leukocytes. J. Exp. Med. 185: 2171
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    White, J. R., C. Imburgia, E. Dul, E. Appelbaum, K. O’Donnell, D. J. O’Shaughnessy, M. Brawner, J. Fornwald, J. Adamou, N. A. Elshourbagy, K. Kaiser, J. J. Foley, D. B. Schmidt, K. Johanson, C. Macphee, K. Moores, D. McNulty, G. F. Scott, R. P. Schleimer, H. M. Sarau. 1997. Cloning and functional characterization of a novel human CC chemokine that binds to the CCR3 receptor and activates human eosinophils. J. Leukocyte Biol. 62: 667
    OpenUrlAbstract
  34. ↵
    Garcia-Zepeda, E. A., C. Combadiere, M. E. Rothenberg, M. N. Sarafi, F. Lavigne, Q. Hamid, P. M. Murphy, A. D. Luster. 1996. Human monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-4 is a novel CC chemokine with activities on monocytes, eosinophils, and basophils induced in allergic and nonallergic inflammation that signals through the CC chemokine receptors (CCR)-2 and -3. J. Immunol. 157: 5613
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    Sallusto, F., C. R. Mackay, A. Lanzavecchia. 1997. Selective expression of the eotaxin receptor CCR3 by human T helper 2 cells. Science 277: 2005
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    Gerber, B. O., M. P. Zanni, M. Uguccioni, M. Loetscher, C. R. Mackay, W. J. Pichler, N. Yawalkar, M. Baggiolini, B. Moser. 1997. Functional expression of the eotaxin receptor CCR3 in T lymphocytes co-localizing with eosinophils. Curr. Biol. 7: 836
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    Bonecchi, R., G. Bianchi, P. P. Bordignon, D. D’Ambrosio, R. Lang, A. Borsatti, S. Sozzani, P. Allavena, P. A. Gray, A. Mantovani, F. Sinigaglia. 1998. Differential expression of chemokine receptors and chemotactic responsiveness of type 1 T helper cells (Th1s) and Th2s. J. Exp. Med. 187: 129
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    Sallusto, F., D. Lenig, C. R. Mackay, A. Lanzavecchia. 1998. Flexible programs of chemokine receptor expression on human polarized T helper 1 and 2 lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 187: 875
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    Gura, T.. 1996. Chemokines take center stage in inflammatory ills. Science 272: 954
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    Wu, L., N. Ruffing, X. Shi, W. Newman, D. Soler, C. R. Mackay, S. Qin. 1996. Discrete steps in binding and signaling of interleukin-8 with its receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 271: 31202
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    Sabroe, I., T. J. Williams, C. A. Hébert, P. D. Collins. 1997. Chemoattractant cross-desensitization of the human neutrophil IL-8 receptor involves receptor internalization and differential receptor subtype regulation. J. Immunol. 158: 1361
    OpenUrlAbstract
  42. ↵
    Premont, R. T., J. Inglese, R. J. Lefkowitz. 1995. Protein kinases that phosphorylate activated G protein-coupled receptors. FASEB J. 6: 175
  43. ↵
    Prossnitz, E. R., C. M. Kim, J. L. Benovic, R. D. Ye. 1995. Phosphorylation of the N-formyl peptide receptor carboxyl terminus by the G protein-coupled receptor kinase, GRK2. J. Biol. Chem. 270: 1130
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    Marleau, S., D. A. Griffiths-Johnson, P. D. Collins, Y. S. Bakhle, T. J. Williams, P. J. Jose. 1996. Human RANTES acts as a receptor antagonist for guinea pig eotaxin in vitro and in vivo. J. Immunol. 157: 4141
    OpenUrlAbstract
  45. ↵
    Kitayama, J., M. W. Carr, S. J. Roth, J. Buccola, T. A. Springer. 1997. Contrasting responses to multiple chemotactic stimuli in transendothelial migration: heterologous desensitization in neutrophils and augmentation of migration in eosinophils. J. Immunol. 158: 2340
    OpenUrlAbstract
  46. ↵
    Tomhave, E. D., R. M. Richardson, J. R. Didsbury, L. Menard, R. Snyderman, H. Ali. 1994. Cross-desensitization of receptors for peptide chemoattractants. J. Immunol. 153: 3267
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    Choe, H., M. Farzan, Y. Sun, N. Sullivan, B. Rollins, P. D. Ponath, L. Wu, C. R. Mackay, G. LaRosa, W. Newman, N. Gerard, C. Gerard, J. Sodroski. 1996. The β-chemokine receptors CCR3 and CCR5 facilitate infection by primary HIV-1 isolates. Cell 85: 1135
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    He, J., Y. Chen, M. Farzan, H. Choe, A. Ohagen, S. Gartner, J. Busciglio, X. Yang, W. Hofmann, W. Newman, C. R. Mackay, J. Sodroski, D. Gabuzda. 1997. CCR3 and CCR5 are co-receptors for HIV-1 infection of microglia. Nature 385: 645
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    Dairaghi, D. J., E. R. Oldham, K. B. Bacon, T. J. Schall. 1997. Chemokine receptor CCR3 function is highly dependent on local pH and ionic strength. J. Biol. Chem. 272: 28206
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    Skelton, N. J., F. Aspiras, J. Ogez, T. J. Schall. 1995. Proton NMR assignments and solution conformation of RANTES, a chemokine of the C-C type. Biochemistry 34: 5329
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    Campbell, E. M., A. E. I. Proudfoot, T. Yoshimura, B. Allet, T. N. C. Wells, A.-M. White, J. Westwick, M. L. Watson. 1997. Recombinant guinea pig and human RANTES activate macrophages but not eosinophils in the guinea pig. J. Immunol. 159: 1482
    OpenUrlAbstract
  52. ↵
    Rollins, B. J.. 1997. Chemokines. Blood 90: 909
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  53. ↵
    Luster, A. D.. 1998. Chemokines: chemotactic cytokines that mediate inflammation. N. Engl. J. Med. 338: 436
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    Baggiolini, M.. 1998. Chemokines and leukocyte traffic. Nature 392: 565
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    Nourshargh, S., T. J. Williams. 1990. Evidence that a receptor-mediated event on the neutrophil mediates neutrophil accumulation in vivo. J. Immunol. 145: 2633
    OpenUrlAbstract
  56. ↵
    Teixeira, M. M., T. N. Wells, N. W. Lukacs, A. E. Proudfoot, S. L. Kunkel, T. J. Williams, P. G. Hellewell. 1997. Chemokine-induced eosinophil recruitment: evidence of a role for endogenous eotaxin in an in vivo allergy model in mouse skin. J. Clin. Invest. 100: 1657
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 161, Issue 11
1 Dec 1998
  • Table of Contents
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cloning and Characterization of the Guinea Pig Eosinophil Eotaxin Receptor, C-C Chemokine Receptor-3: Blockade Using a Monoclonal Antibody In Vivo
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Cloning and Characterization of the Guinea Pig Eosinophil Eotaxin Receptor, C-C Chemokine Receptor-3: Blockade Using a Monoclonal Antibody In Vivo
Ian Sabroe, Dolores M. Conroy, Norma P. Gerard, You Li, Paul D. Collins, Theodore W. Post, Peter J. Jose, Timothy J. Williams, Craig J. Gerard, Paul D. Ponath
The Journal of Immunology December 1, 1998, 161 (11) 6139-6147;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Cloning and Characterization of the Guinea Pig Eosinophil Eotaxin Receptor, C-C Chemokine Receptor-3: Blockade Using a Monoclonal Antibody In Vivo
Ian Sabroe, Dolores M. Conroy, Norma P. Gerard, You Li, Paul D. Collins, Theodore W. Post, Peter J. Jose, Timothy J. Williams, Craig J. Gerard, Paul D. Ponath
The Journal of Immunology December 1, 1998, 161 (11) 6139-6147;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • The Crystal Structure of the MHC Class I (MHC-I) Molecule in the Green Anole Lizard Demonstrates the Unique MHC-I System in Reptiles
  • Loss of the Transfer RNA Wobble Uridine–Modifying Enzyme Elp3 Delays T Cell Cycle Entry and Impairs T Follicular Helper Cell Responses through Deregulation of Atf4
  • Structure and Functional Characterization of a Humanized Anti-CCL20 Antibody following Exposure to Serum Reveals the Formation of Immune Complex That Leads to Toxicity
Show more MOLECULAR AND STRUCTURAL IMMUNOLOGY

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Public Access
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606