Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
      • Neuroimmunology: To Sense and Protect
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Differentiation of Naive CTL to Effector and Memory CTL: Correlation of Effector Function with Phenotype and Cell Division

Stephan Oehen and Karin Brduscha-Riem
J Immunol November 15, 1998, 161 (10) 5338-5346;
Stephan Oehen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karin Brduscha-Riem
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Surface marker modulation after in vitro activation of 318-CFSE CTL. CFSE-labeled 318 spleen cells were stimulated with 2 × 10−8 M peptide p33 and analyzed after 72 h for cell division in CD8-PE versus CFSE contour plots and in CFSE histograms after gating on CD8+CTL. Marker expression levels were determined after gating on the respective populations in the contour plots and displaying the third color in the histograms below. Numbers indicate division cycles. Naive = expression levels on naive 318 CTL. A representative result from at least three independent experiments is shown.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    In vivo detection of cell division after viral infection. 318-CFSE spleen cells were transferred into recipients 1 day before i.v. injection with the indicated doses of LCMV WE. Three days after infection, spleen cells and mesenteric lymph node cells were stained with anti-CD8-PE and analyzed by two-color flow cytometry. Lines represent CFSE fluorescence intensities of CTL that have divided zero to seven times. A representative of at least two experiments is shown.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Surface marker analysis of in vivo differentiating CTL. Recipients were transfused with 318-CFSE spleen cells, and mesenteric lymph nodes were analyzed 3 days after i.v. injection of 5 × 103 PFU of LCMV WE. Cells were stained for CD8 and for the indicated surface markers. Expression levels in dependence of cell cycle number were determined as described in Fig. 1. Endogenous = endogenous CTL population. Naive = surface marker expression levels on naive 318 CTL. Surface marker expression levels on 318 CTL 3 days after transfer into naive recipients were indistinguishable from fresh naive 318 CTL. A representative result from at least three independent experiments is shown.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    TCR modulation after viral infection. 318-CFSE spleen cells were transfused into recipients and activated in vivo by i.v. injection of 5000 PFU of LCMV WE (Effector). Uninfected recipients (Naive) served as a comparison. After 3 days, mesenteric lymph nodes were stained with anti-CD8-PE or anti-Vα2-PE, to directly compare transgenic TCR modulation on proliferating CD8+CTL (upper versus lower panels). Black and white arrows point at TCRhigh and TCRlow CTL, respectively, which are absent in the noninfected controls (left plot), but are visible in the infected recipients (right plot). A representative result from at least four mice is shown.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    A, CTL acquire cytotoxic effector function within one cell division. 318-CFSE spleen cells were activated in vitro with p33, as described in Fig. 1. After 16 h (0 div) or 30 h (0–1 div), standard cultures were harvested and an aliquot was analyzed for cell division by gating on CD8-PE+CTL and displaying CFSE intensities in a histogram (upper panels). Cultures were then tested in a 5-h 51Cr release assay (lower graph). Cultures that had not divided yet (boxes) or that had divided once (triangles) were analyzed on unpulsed (open symbols) or p33-pulsed (filled symbols) EL-4 target cells. Spontaneous release was <12% for all targets. B, Cytotoxic effector function of acutely activated and memory CTL. 318-CFSE spleen cell cultures were stimulated with p33 for 48 h (div 0–4) to obtain effector CTL. For long-term cultures, 318-CFSE spleen cells were stimulated by a single addition of p33 (final concentration: 10−8 M), washed after 3 days, split at a ratio of 1:4, and recultured for an additional 4 days (div 6–10). Cell cycle numbers were determined as described above (top two panels). Cytotoxic activity (bottom panel) was determined in a 51Cr release assay at the indicated E:T ratios on p33-pulsed (closed symbols) and unpulsed (open symbols) EL-4 target cells. 0–4 div cultures were incubated for 5 h (squares); 6–10 div cultures for 5 h (triangles) and 20 h (circles). After 5 h, spontaneous releases were <10%; after 20 h, <25%. C, Phenotype of short-term (0–4 div) and long-term (6–10 div) cultures. Cultures from B were stained for CD8 and CD44 or CD62L. After gating on the most prominent division peak (div2 and div8, respectively), surface marker expression levels were displayed in a histogram and compared with naive 318 CTL. A representative of three independent cultures is shown.

  • FIGURE 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 6.

    A, In vivo effector function of naive, effector, and memory CTL. Day 3 effector mice (Effector) were generated by transfusing 3 × 107 318 spleen cells into syngeneic hosts and infecting them with 1000 PFU of LCMV. Memory mice were obtained by adoptively transferring 1 × 106 318 spleen cells into naive recipients and infecting them i.v. with 200 PFU of LCMV WE 30 or 60 days (17) before determination of CTL effector function. Untreated 318 mice served as naive control mice. To analyze CTL effector function in vivo, target cells were prepared by pulsing syngeneic spleen cells with p33 and labeling them with a high CFSE intensity. To control for Ag specificity, unpulsed syngeneic spleen cells were labeled with a low CFSE intensity. A 1:1 mixture of 3 × 107 cells of each of the target cell populations was injected i.v. into the naive 318 controls, the effector, or the memory mice. After 4, 11, and 20 h, blood was collected from the tail vein and analyzed in a single-parameter flow-cytometric analysis for the presence of the CFSEhigh (p33-pulsed) and CFSElow (unpulsed) target cell populations. To test for contact-dependent, specific cytotoxic effector function, the elimination of p33-pulsed CFSEhigh spleen cells was monitored and the ratio (r) between percentage of nonpulsed and percentage of p33-pulsed indicator cells was calculated. Data show a representative of three mice. B, CD62L expression on naive, effector, and memory LCMV-specific CTL. Blood was collected from the mice described in A before transfer of the target cells and triple stained for transgenic Vα2, CD8, and CD62L or CD44 (not shown). CD62L expression is shown after gating on CD8- and Vα2-positive lymphocytes. A representative result from three independent day 30 memory mice is shown.

  • FIGURE 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 7.

    CD62L-negative effector memory CTL are predominately located in the spleen and exert rapid effector function. Day 30 memory mice were generated as described in Fig. 6. An aliquot of spleen and pooled mesenteric and inguinal lymph node cells was triple stained for CD8, Vα2, and CD62L. CD62L expression levels in spleen and lymph node are displayed in the histograms after gating on the CD8+Vα2+ transgenic CTL. To assay for immediate and delayed effector function, spleen cells and lymph node cells were tested in a 6- and 19-h cytotoxicity assay, respectively, on p33-coated (filled boxes) and uncoated (open boxes) EL-4 target cells at the indicated E:T ratios (bottom panels). A representative histogram from three mice is shown for spleen and lymph nodes. The results from three memory mice are depicted in the cytotoxicity assay.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table I.

    Summary of surface marker modulations on CTL activated in vitro and in vivoa

    Surface MarkerIn Vitro Cell Division NumberbIn Vivo Cell Division Numberc
    0123456012345
    CD25↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↔↔↔↑↑↑↑↑↑
    CD69↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↔↔↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑
    CD62L↔↔↔↔↔↔↔↔↔↓↓↓↓↓↓↓
    CD44↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↔↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑
    Fas↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↔↑↑↑↑↑↔
    FasL↑↑↑↑↑↑↔↔↔NDNDNDNDNDND
    TCR↔↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↔d↓d↓↓d↓↓↓d↓↓↓dNVd
    • a Marker modulations are compared to naive 318 CTL: ↔, no modulation; ↑, 0- to 5-fold up-regulation; ↑↑, 5- to 10-fold up-regulation; ↑↑↑, ≥10-fold up-regulation; ↓, 0- to 5-fold down-regulation; ↓↓, 5- to 10-fold down-regulation; ↓↓↓, ≥10-fold down-regulation; ND, not done; NV, not visible.

    • b Data taken from Fig. 1⇑.

    • c Data taken from Fig. 3⇑.

    • d Data taken from Fig. 4⇓.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 161, Issue 10
15 Nov 1998
  • Table of Contents
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Differentiation of Naive CTL to Effector and Memory CTL: Correlation of Effector Function with Phenotype and Cell Division
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Differentiation of Naive CTL to Effector and Memory CTL: Correlation of Effector Function with Phenotype and Cell Division
Stephan Oehen, Karin Brduscha-Riem
The Journal of Immunology November 15, 1998, 161 (10) 5338-5346;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Differentiation of Naive CTL to Effector and Memory CTL: Correlation of Effector Function with Phenotype and Cell Division
Stephan Oehen, Karin Brduscha-Riem
The Journal of Immunology November 15, 1998, 161 (10) 5338-5346;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Innate Immunity Together with Duration of Antigen Persistence Regulate Effector T Cell Induction
  • Regulatory Roles of IL-2 and IL-4 in H4/Inducible Costimulator Expression on Activated CD4+ T Cells During Th Cell Development
  • Induction of CD4+ T Cell Apoptosis as a Consequence of Impaired Cytoskeletal Rearrangement in UVB-Irradiated Dendritic Cells
Show more CELLULAR IMMUNOLOGY AND IMMUNE REGULATION

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • FAR 889
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606