Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
      • Neuroimmunology: To Sense and Protect
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

In Vitro Comparison of the Biologic Activities of Monoclonal Monomeric IgA, Polymeric IgA, and Secretory IgA

Kathryn B. Renegar, Graham D. F. Jackson and Jiri Mestecky
J Immunol February 1, 1998, 160 (3) 1219-1223;
Kathryn B. Renegar
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Graham D. F. Jackson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jiri Mestecky
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Binding of influenza-specific S-IgA and pIgA by anti-rat SC and anti-mouse α antibodies. Purified monoclonal pIgA (open symbols) or S-IgA (closed symbols) was assayed for its ability to bind to influenza virus in an ELISA. Bound Abs were assayed for mouse α-chains (circles) or rat SC (squares) with the appropriate antisera. The dotted line represents the background level of anti-SC binding.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    ELISA titers of pIgA, S-IgA, and mIgA anti-influenza mAbs. Purified S-IgA (closed squares), pIgA (open squares), and mIgA (closed circles) were tested simultaneously for their ability to bind to influenza virus in an ELISA. One ELISA binding unit of each preparation was calculated as the Ab dilution that gave an OD of 1 in this assay.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Hemagglutination inhibition by pIgA, S-IgA, and mIgA. PR8 influenza virus (2 HAU) was incubated for 30 min at room temperature with varying amounts of purified pIgA, S-IgA, or mIgA, then mixed with 0.5% CRBCs and incubated on ice until an HA pattern was apparent.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Neutralization of PR8 influenza virus by pIgA, S-IgA, and mIgA anti-H1 mAbs. Various dilutions of purified pIgA (open squares), S-IgA (closed squares), or mIgA (closed circles) were incubated on ice for 1 h with 102.5 TCID50 PR8 influenza virus, then 10-fold serial dilutions of the neutralization mixture were assayed on MDCK cells using the standard neutralization protocol. Fractionated normal rat bile and ZF11-15 IgA Ab, which were included as controls, did not neutralize virus.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    Effect of trypsin preincubation. S-IgA or pIgA (0.1, 1, or 10 EBU) or mIgA (1, 10, or 100 EBU) was preincubated overnight at 34°C in the presence or the absence of 0.0002% trypsin, then incubated on ice for 1 h with 102.5 TCID50 PR8 influenza virus. Tenfold serial dilutions of the neutralization mixture were assayed on MDCK cells using the standard neutralization protocol.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 160, Issue 3
1 Feb 1998
  • Table of Contents
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
In Vitro Comparison of the Biologic Activities of Monoclonal Monomeric IgA, Polymeric IgA, and Secretory IgA
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
In Vitro Comparison of the Biologic Activities of Monoclonal Monomeric IgA, Polymeric IgA, and Secretory IgA
Kathryn B. Renegar, Graham D. F. Jackson, Jiri Mestecky
The Journal of Immunology February 1, 1998, 160 (3) 1219-1223;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
In Vitro Comparison of the Biologic Activities of Monoclonal Monomeric IgA, Polymeric IgA, and Secretory IgA
Kathryn B. Renegar, Graham D. F. Jackson, Jiri Mestecky
The Journal of Immunology February 1, 1998, 160 (3) 1219-1223;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • The Crystal Structure of the MHC Class I (MHC-I) Molecule in the Green Anole Lizard Demonstrates the Unique MHC-I System in Reptiles
  • Structure and Functional Characterization of a Humanized Anti-CCL20 Antibody following Exposure to Serum Reveals the Formation of Immune Complex That Leads to Toxicity
  • Loss of the Transfer RNA Wobble Uridine–Modifying Enzyme Elp3 Delays T Cell Cycle Entry and Impairs T Follicular Helper Cell Responses through Deregulation of Atf4
Show more MOLECULAR AND STRUCTURAL IMMUNOLOGY

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Public Access
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606