Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
      • Neuroimmunology: To Sense and Protect
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

In Vitro Comparison of the Biologic Activities of Monoclonal Monomeric IgA, Polymeric IgA, and Secretory IgA

Kathryn B. Renegar, Graham D. F. Jackson and Jiri Mestecky
J Immunol February 1, 1998, 160 (3) 1219-1223;
Kathryn B. Renegar
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Graham D. F. Jackson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jiri Mestecky
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Secretory IgA (S-IgA), a major humoral mediator of mucosal immunity, is a polymeric Ig containing an unusual extra polypeptide, secretory component (SC), added during transcytosis through epithelial cells. Polymeric S-IgA is more effective than monomeric IgA (mIgA) and IgG in neutralizing viruses. It is not known whether this increased efficacy is due solely to the polymeric structure of the molecule or whether SC itself makes S-IgA more efficient; a quantitative in vitro comparison of the biologic activities of S-IgA and pIgA has not been reported. We prepared purified pIgA and mIgA mAbs directed toward the H1 hemagglutinin of PR8 influenza virus and purified monoclonal S-IgA (made from monoclonal pIgA injected into a Lewis rat and collected as S-IgA from bile) and compared their abilities to carry out hemagglutination inhibition (HI) and neutralization of the infectivity of PR8 influenza virus in vitro. The polymeric Igs (pIgA and S-IgA) were 5 times more effective than mIgA in HI and 7 to 10 times more effective than mIgA in virus neutralization. Addition of SC to pIgA did not modify its ability to mediate HI and had only a minimal effect (S-IgA was 1.4 times more effective) on its ability to neutralize influenza virus in vitro. Trypsin preincubation partially abolished mIgA- or pIgA-mediated, but not S-IgA-mediated, viral neutralization. Thus, although S-IgA is more stable functionally than pIgA, the addition of SC does not influence, positively or negatively, the biologic activity associated with the Fab of S-IgA.

  • Received April 24, 1997.
  • Accepted October 8, 1997.
  • Copyright © 1998 by The American Association of Immunologists
View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 160, Issue 3
1 Feb 1998
  • Table of Contents
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
In Vitro Comparison of the Biologic Activities of Monoclonal Monomeric IgA, Polymeric IgA, and Secretory IgA
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
In Vitro Comparison of the Biologic Activities of Monoclonal Monomeric IgA, Polymeric IgA, and Secretory IgA
Kathryn B. Renegar, Graham D. F. Jackson, Jiri Mestecky
The Journal of Immunology February 1, 1998, 160 (3) 1219-1223;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
In Vitro Comparison of the Biologic Activities of Monoclonal Monomeric IgA, Polymeric IgA, and Secretory IgA
Kathryn B. Renegar, Graham D. F. Jackson, Jiri Mestecky
The Journal of Immunology February 1, 1998, 160 (3) 1219-1223;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • The Crystal Structure of the MHC Class I (MHC-I) Molecule in the Green Anole Lizard Demonstrates the Unique MHC-I System in Reptiles
  • Structure and Functional Characterization of a Humanized Anti-CCL20 Antibody following Exposure to Serum Reveals the Formation of Immune Complex That Leads to Toxicity
  • Loss of the Transfer RNA Wobble Uridine–Modifying Enzyme Elp3 Delays T Cell Cycle Entry and Impairs T Follicular Helper Cell Responses through Deregulation of Atf4
Show more MOLECULAR AND STRUCTURAL IMMUNOLOGY

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Public Access
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606