Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
      • Neuroimmunology: To Sense and Protect
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Differential Regulation of Chemoattractant-Stimulated β2, β3, and β7 Integrin Activity

Chanchal Sadhu, Boris Masinovsky and Donald E. Staunton
J Immunol June 1, 1998, 160 (11) 5622-5628;
Chanchal Sadhu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Boris Masinovsky
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Donald E. Staunton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Leukocyte adhesion to endothelium and extravasation are dynamic processes that require activation of integrins. Chemoattractants such as IL-8 and FMLP are potent activators of leukocyte integrins. To compare the chemoattractant-stimulated activation of three integrins, α4β7, αLβ2, and αVβ3, in the same cellular context, we expressed an IL-8 receptor (IL-8RA) and FMLP receptor (FPR) in the lymphoid cell line JY. Chemoattractants induced a rapid increase in αLβ2- and αVβ3-dependent JY adhesion within 5 min, and it was sustained for 30 min. In contrast, stimulation of α4β7-dependent adhesion was transient, returning to basal levels by 30 min. The activation profiles of the integrins were similar regardless of whether IL-8 or FMLP was used for induction. We also demonstrate that α4β7-dependent adhesion was uniquely responsive to the F actin-disrupting agent cytochalasin D and the protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor chelerythrin. While αVβ3- and αLβ2-mediated cell adhesion was significantly reduced by cytochalasin D, α4β7-mediated adhesion was enhanced. Chelerythrin inhibited both the IL-8 and PMA activation of αLβ2 and αVβ3. In contrast, inducible α4β7 activity was unaffected, and basal activity was increased. These findings demonstrate that the mechanism of α4β7 regulation by chemoattractants is different from that of αLβ2 and αVβ3 and that it appears to involve distinct cytoskeletal and PKC dependencies. In addition, PKC activity may be a positive or negative regulator of integrin-dependent adhesion.

Extravasation of circulating leukocytes through the endothelium into tissues is a multistep process involving primary and secondary adhesion (1, 2, 3, 4). Primary adhesion involves an interaction with a rapid association and dissociation rate that mediates initial contact and rolling of leukocytes on endothelium under flow conditions. Selectins and the integrins α4β1 and α4β7 can mediate primary adhesion (1, 5). During secondary adhesion, leukocytes adhere firmly to the endothelium and undergo a change in cell shape. Binding of leukocyte β2 (CD18) and α4 integrins to endothelial cell ICAMs and VCAM-1 can mediate secondary adhesion (1, 3).

Firm adhesion of leukocytes to the endothelium is dependent on signaling that leads to integrin activation, which is manifested in increased avidity for ligands. Leukocyte integrins can be activated via different receptor types. For example, engagement of T cell surface molecules such as TCR and L-selectin has been shown to activate binding of the leukointegrin αLβ2 (CD11a/CD18, LFA-1) to ICAM-1 (6, 7). In addition, soluble mediators such as chemoattractants including chemokines have been reported to induce increased integrin-dependent leukocyte adhesion. Classical chemoattractants such as FMLP and C5a have been shown to activate CD18 integrins on eosinophils (8). Among the different chemokines, IL-8 can activate integrins on neutrophils and regulate transendothelial migration of neutrophils (9).

Chemoattractants activate integrins subsequent to binding their heterotrimeric G protein-coupled receptors. However, little is known of the exact downstream signaling pathway or the effects of these inducers on individual integrins. Emerging evidence suggest that protein kinase C (PKC2) and phosphatidyl inositol-3 kinase contribute to the signals leading to integrin activation (10). Work by Campbell et al. (11) and Weber et al. (8) suggests a complex effect by chemoattractants on integrin activation and chemotaxis. The T cell line Jurkat, expressing the receptors for IL-8, MIP-1α, C5a, or FMLP, showed a strong but transient activation of α4β1-dependent adhesion in the presence of a high concentration of the appropriate agonist (11). However, suppression of chemotaxis was observed at higher than optimum agonist concentrations, indicating distinct regulation of adhesion and chemotaxis. Stimulation of human eosinophils with RANTES, MCP-3, or C5a produced a rapid and transient activation of α4β1 but prolonged activation of αMβ2 (8). These results suggest a differential regulation of the β1 and β2 integrins.

Here, we report different signaling and cytoskeletal requirements for chemoattractant-stimulated activation of three integrins in the background of one cell type. We have generated lymphoid cell lines to address the mechanism of integrin activation subsequent to stimulation by agonists of G protein-coupled receptors. Thus, we have studied IL-8- and FMLP-mediated activation of α4β7, αvβ3, and αLβ2 in a B lymphoid cell line, JY, expressing IL-8 or FMLP receptors. Our results demonstrate a distinct regulation of α4β7 integrin activity relative to that of αLβ2 and αvβ3 integrins.

Materials and Methods

Antibodies

The FLAG epitope-specific mAb M1 was from Eastman Kodak (Rochester, NY). Cells producing the αL mAb, TS1/22, were from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), Rockville, MD, and the β1 mAb, 3S3, was a gift from Dr. John Wilkins, University of Manitoba (Winnipeg, Canada). The β2 mAb, 22F12C, and the α4 mAb, 72A1H, were generated at ICOS. Fib 504.64, a rat anti-mouse β7 mAb (12) that also binds to human β7, was obtained from ATCC. All of the Abs were purified according to standard procedures.

Generation of human lymphoid cell lines expressing IL-8 or FMLP receptor

The human IL-8RA (IL-8 receptor subtype A) (13) sequence was amplified from genomic DNA. The FMLP receptor (FPR) cDNA was a gift from Dr. Richard Ye (The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA). HindIII and XbaI restriction endonuclease sites were added by PCR to the 5′ and 3′ ends of the IL-8RA and the FPR cDNA clones. For IL-8RA, the following oligonucleotide primers were used: 5′ (HindIII), 5′ATGCAAGCTTTCAAAT ATTACAGATCCA 3′; and 3′ (XbaI), 5′ATGCTCTAGATTTTCAGAGGTTGGAAGAG AC 3′. Sequences of the oligonucleotide primers used for the FPR cDNA are: 5′ (HindIII), 5′ATGCAAGCTTGAGACAAATTCCTCTCTC 3′; and 3′ (XbaI), 5′ATGCTCTAG ATCACTTTGCCTGTAACGCCAC 3′. The PCR-amplified products were verified by DNA sequencing. The mammalian expression vector, pcDNA3 (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA) was modified by inserting the bovine prolactin signal sequence and the FLAG epitope (Eastman Kodak) 3 prime to the CMV promoter. The HindIII-XbaI site-adapted cDNAs were then ligated to the corresponding sites of the pcDNA3-FLAG expression vector. In the resulting construct, the IL-8RA and FPR cDNAs were in-frame to the prolactin signal sequence and the FLAG epitope.

The FLAG-tagged receptors were expressed in the human B lymphoblastoid cell line, JY, obtained from ATCC. For each electorporation, 1 × 107 cells were centrifuged, washed in ice-cold PBS, and resuspended in 0.5 ml of PBS. Thirty micrograms of the expression construct DNA was added to the cell suspension and incubated on ice for 10 min. Electroporation was done at 250 V, 960 μFd capacitance, using a Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA) electroporator. After incubating the electroporated cells on ice for 10 min, they were transferred to the growth medium for 24 h. The transfected cells were then selected using G418 at 1 mg/ml in medium. Expression of the receptors on the surface of the transfected cells was monitored using the anti-FLAG Ab, M1 (Eastman Kodak). About 10% of the G418-resistant cells expressed the FLAG epitope. The cell population was stained with the M1 Ab and sorted for high levels of receptor-expressing cells. After two rounds of sorting, 95% of the cells expressed the FLAG epitope. Functional expression of the receptors was confirmed by cell adhesion and chemotactic assays in the presence of IL-8 and FMLP (see below). These cells were designated JY-8 and JY-fp.

Adhesion assay

Adhesion assays were performed in 96-well Easy Wash plates (Corning Glass, Corning, NY) using a modified procedure (14). Each well was coated with 50 μl of ICAM-1/Fc (10 μg/ml), VCAM-1/Fc (5 μg/ml), or vitronectin (0.5 μg/ml) in 50 mM bicarbonate buffer (pH 9.6). Some wells were coated with a β2 mAb (22F12C, ICOS), to quantitate the maximum number of input cells binding, (taken as 100%) or glycophorin, to determine background binding. Plates were blocked with 1% BSA in PBS for 1 h at room temperature. Wells were then rinsed and 200 μl of adhesion buffer (RPMI + 0.2% human serum albumin) was added with or without PMA (20 ng/ml), IL-8, or FMLP. Cells (100 μl of 1 × 106/ml) were then added to each well, and plates were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for the indicated time. Cells were allowed to settle on the plate for 25 min, and then PMA (20 ng/ml) or IL-8 or FMLP was added. In some assays, cells were mixed with cytochalasin D and added to the wells such that the final concentration of cytochalasin D was 10 μg/ml. For chelerythrin treatment, cells were preincubated with the inhibitor at 37°C for 10 min and then added to wells. Adherent cells were fixed with the addition of 50 μl of a 10% glutaraldehyde solution and stained with 0.5% crystal violet (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) solution. The plates were washed in several changes of water. After washing, 70% ethanol was added, and adherent cells were quantitated by determining absorbance at 570 nm using a SPECTRAmax 250 microplate spectrophotometer system (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). Percentage of cell binding was determined using the formula: Math

Results

Establishment of IL-8 and FMLP receptor-expressing cell lines

For a detailed analysis of integrin activation by chemoattractants, we have established cell lines stably expressing either of two chemoattractant receptors. The formyl peptide receptor, FPR, is representative of the classical chemoattractant receptor, and the other, IL-8RA (CCR1), is a member of the α chemokine (CXC) receptor family. Based on their pertussis toxin sensitivity, it is believed that both of these receptors transduce a signal through the Gi class of G proteins (15, 16). These receptors were tagged with the FLAG epitope at their N termini and were expressed in the human B lymphoid cell line JY. JY cells express the integrins αLβ2, αvβ3, and α4β7 (Fig. 1⇓), all of which may be stimulated by PMA (data not shown). The untransfected cells did not respond to the chemoattractants, as there was no increased αLβ2-, αVβ3-, or α4β7-dependent binding observed in the presence of either FMLP or IL-8 (data not presented). After transfection and G418 selection, cells were sorted using a mAb that binds to the FLAG epitope. Following two rounds of sorting, cell lines expressing high levels of FPR (JY-fp) and IL-8RA (JY-8) were established (Fig. 1⇓). Cell surface expression of both the IL-8 and FMLP receptors remained stable for months without subsequent G418 selection.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Expression of chemoattractant receptors and integrins on JY transfectants. JY cells were transfected with either IL-8RA (JY-8) or FPR (JY-fp) expression constructs, selected with G418, and sorted using the anti-FLAG mAb, M1. Cell surface expression (shaded areas) of the indicated molecule was determined by staining with the following mAb: IL-8RA (M1); αL (TS1/22); β2 (22F12C); FPR (M1); αVβ3 (mAb 1976; αVβ5 (mAb 1961); α4 (72A1H); β1 (3S3); β7 (Fib 504.64). Unshaded curves show staining with isotype-matched irrelevant mAb. Expression of integrins in JY-8 cells are shown. The pattern of integrin expression in JY-fp cells (not shown) was identical to that of the JY-8 cells. The level of FPR expression by the JY-fp cells is shown in the bottom right panel.

IL-8- or FMLP-induced activation of integrins on JY transfectants

We tested JY-8 and JY-fp for their ability to activate integrins upon treatment with IL-8 or FMLP. Of the four known β2 (CD18) integrins, JY cells express only αLβ2, which binds to ICAM-1. As shown in Figure 2⇓, IL-8 stimulated JY-8 adhesion to ICAM-1 in a concentration-dependent manner. The maximum response was observed at about 60 ng/ml of IL-8 (Fig. 2⇓A). This concentration of IL-8 also resulted in maximal stimulation of α4β7- and αVβ3-dependent adhesion (data now shown). At this concentration, there was a two- to threefold increase in αLβ2-mediated adhesion to ICAM-1. This response was similar in magnitude to PMA-stimulated JY-8 adhesion to ICAM-1 (Fig. 2⇓A). Adhesion of JY-8 to ICAM-1 was completely and specifically blocked by the αL (CD11a) mAb and the β2 (CD18) mAb (data not shown). JY cells transfected with the expression vector (JY-vector) did not demonstrate IL-8-stimulated binding (Fig. 2⇓A).

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Dose-response of agonist-induced cell adhesion to ICAM-1. A, IL-8 concentration dependence of JY-8 (open bars) and JY-vector (solid bars) adhesion; B, FMLP concentration dependence of JY-fp (open bars) and JY-vector (solid bars) adhesion. Error bars show the range of triplicate samples. One representative example of several experiments is shown. Percentage of cell binding was determined by crystal violet staining, quantification of A570, and normalized according to the formula presented in Materials and Methods.

JY-fp binding to ICAM-1 was specifically stimulated by FMLP, with maximum binding observed at ∼600 nM (Fig. 2⇑B). At this concentration of FMLP, there was an approximately threefold increase in binding of JY-fp to ICAM-1. FMLP did not stimulate adhesion of JY-vector cells (Fig. 2⇑B). Thus, JY-fp and JY-8 express functional chemoattractant receptors.

Activation profiles of αLβ2, αvβ3, and α4β7 by IL-8 and FMLP

We determined and compared the magnitude and rate of chemoattractant-mediated activation of three integrins expressed in JY-8 and JY-fp. JY cells express the integrins α4β7 and αVβ3 (Fig. 1⇑), which bind to VCAM-1 and vitronectin, respectively (17, 18). JY cells may express a very low level of β1 integrin (Fig. 1⇑, second row, middle panel), however, binding to VCAM-1 was blocked by β7-blocking mAb, and not by β1-blocking mAb (data not shown). Thus, we compared binding of the JY-8 and JY-fp cells to ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and vitronectin as an indication of the activation profile of αLβ2, α4β7, and αVβ3.

In the absence of stimulation, there was a slight increase in JY-8 and JY-fp binding to ICAM-1 within the first 5 min. Thereafter, this level of binding did not change significantly for up to 30 min (Fig. 3⇓, A and D). In the presence of the appropriate agonists, however, both the JY-8 and the JY-fp cells showed two- to threefold enhanced binding to ICAM-1 within 5 min. Thus, there is a rapid activation of αLβ2 induced by the binding of either agonist to their corresponding receptors. The initial two- to threefold increase in binding was sustained for at least 30 min.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

IL-8 or FMLP induced prolonged activation of αLβ2 and αVβ3 and transient activation of α4β7. Shown are the time courses of agonist induced cell adhesion to ICAM-1 (10 μg/ml), VCAM-1 (5 μg/ml), and vitronectin (0.5 μg/ml). A, B, C, IL-8; D, E, F, FMLP. Gray bar indicates with agonist; open bar, without agonist. Final concentration of IL-8 was 100 ng/ml and that of FMLP was 500 nM. After cells settled, agonists were added and the plate was incubated at 37°C. Incubation was stopped by the addition of glutaraldehyde (final concentration of 1.5%) at the indicated times. Percentage of cell adhesion was determined as described in Figure 2⇑ legend. Shown is one representative of three experiments.

The activation profile of αVβ3 was similar to that of αLβ2 (Fig. 3⇑, C and F). There was a rapid increase in JY-8 and JY-fp cell binding to vitronectin within 5 min of adding either IL-8 or FMLP, as compared with the binding in the absence of either agonist. The maximum level of induced binding in the presence of the agonists was two- to threefold. Since the activation of αvβ3 was sustained, the ratio of induced binding to uninduced binding did not change significantly for as long as 30 min.

The activation profile of α4β7 in JY-8 and JY-fp differed from that of αLβ2 and αVβ3. As shown in Figure 3⇑B, there was increased binding of the JY-8 cells to VCAM-1 within the first 5 min after adding IL-8, indicating a rapid activation of α4β7. Both the response time and fold increase was similar to that of αLβ2 and αVβ3. However, the induced α4β7-mediated binding in response to IL-8 was not sustained. After the initial 5 min, a steady decrease in binding was observed. By 30 min, the extent of cell adhesion to VCAM-1 in the presence of IL-8 was essentially the same as in the absence of IL-8. This resulted in a decreased ratio of binding to VCAM-1 in the presence of IL-8 vs in the absence of IL-8. The observed decrease in the ratio between 5 and 30 min is in contrast to the profile of binding to ICAM-1 and vitronectin, indicating a differential temporal regulation of α4β7.

Chemoattractant-stimulated binding of JY-fp cells to VCAM-1 was similar to that of JY-8. As shown in Figure 3⇑E, FMLP caused a rapid increase in the JY-fp cell binding to VCAM-1 within 5 min. With longer periods of incubation, the agonist-stimulated binding was not sustained. Since both JY-8 and JY-fp demonstrated a transient induction of binding to VCAM-1 relative to ICAM-1 and vitronectin, this suggests a unique and integrin-proximal modulation of the α4β7 activity.

Differential effect of cytochalasin D on activation of αLβ2-, α4β7-, and αVβ3-mediated activation of cell adhesion

Cytochalasin D, which prevents actin polymerization (19), blocks PMA-induced αLβ2-mediated aggregation of JY cells, suggesting a role for F actin in the regulation of αLβ2 activity (20). We tested whether IL-8- or PMA-induced activation of integrins on JY-8 requires an intact cytoskeleton. Because FMLP- and IL-8-stimulated responses were identical, with perhaps both receptors interacting with the same Gαi, only IL-8 was used in these and subsequent assays. Cytochalasin D treatment significantly reduced both IL-8- and PMA-induced cell binding to ICAM-1 (Fig. 4⇓A). A similar pattern of cytochalasin D inhibition was observed for αVβ3-dependent adhesion to vitronectin (Fig. 4⇓C). In contrast to that of αLβ2 and αVβ3, α4β7-mediated JY-8 binding was markedly enchanced in the presence of the same concentration of cytochalasin D (Fig. 4⇓B). A greater than threefold enhancement of α4β7-mediated JY-8 cell binding to VCAM-1 was observed in the presence of cytochalasin D alone. IL-8 or PMA further increased JY-8 cell adhesion to VCAM-1 in the presence of cytochalasin D. Thus, α4β7 differs from αLβ2 and αVβ3 in its requirement of F actin.

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

Differential cytoskeleton dependency for integrin-dependent cell adhesion. JY-8 cells were treated with cytochalasin D (solid bars) or DMSO (open bars) and allowed to bind to ICAM-1 (A)-, VCAM-1 (B)-, or vitronectin (VN) (C)-coated surfaces. Cells were incubated for an additional 5 min in the presence of no agonist, IL-8, or PMA. Percentage of cell adhesion was determined as described in the Figure 2⇑ legend. Shown is one representative of three experiments.

Role of PKC in IL-8-stimulated integrin activation

Members of the PKC family of enzymes can stimulate integrin-dependent adhesion, since the PKC agonist, PMA, stimulates integrin activity. Calphostin C, a potent inhibitor of diacylglycerol and Ca2+-dependent PKC isoforms (21), can block PMA-induced α4β1 and αMβ2 integrin activation (16). However, calphostin C did not inhibit IL-8- or FMLP-stimulated α4β1- and αMβ2-dependent adhesion (16).

We used chelerythrin (22), a catalytic domain antagonist of different PKC isoforms, to determine whether different PKC family members are involved in IL-8-mediated integrin activation in JY-8. Although chelerythrin may have broad specificity, its IC50 for different PKC isoforms can vary. Initially, we determined the effect of a range of concentrations of chelerythrin on αLβ2-dependent JY-8 adhesion to ICAM-1 (Fig. 5⇓). At concentrations <6 μM, chelerythrin did not inhibit IL-8- or PMA-stimulated binding. At 6 μM, there was no inhibition of PMA-stimulated binding, although IL-8-stimulated binding was blocked 50%, while at 12.5 μM or higher concentrations, chelerythrin substantially blocked both IL-8- and PMA-stimulated cell adhesion. These results suggest a role for PKC in IL-8- mediated stimulation of αLβ2.

FIGURE 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5.

Inhibition of αLβ2-mediated cell adhesion by the PKC inhibitor chelerythrin. JY-8 cells were pretreated with chelerythrin for 10 min at 37°C and allowed to settle in wells coated with ICAM-1. Percentage of cell binding at the end of 5 min (with no inducer □, IL-8 □, or PMA ▪) was measured as described in the legends to Figures 2⇑ and 4⇑. Final concentration of chelerythrin in each well is indicated. Duration and concentration of chelerythrin during the experiment did not affect cell viability as measured by trypan blue staining. One representative of three experiments is shown.

We further compared the effect of chelerythrin on αLβ2, α4β7, and αVβ3 activity. Because at 12.5 μM chelerythrin blocked both chemoattractant- and PMA-stimulated adhesion of JY-8 to ICAM-1 (Fig. 5⇑), it was used in additional experiments. Chelerythrin was not used at higher concentrations at which additional PKC isoforms or kinases might be inhibited. As seen in Figure 6⇓, A and C, at this concentration chelerythrin markedly inhibited both IL-8- and PMA-stimulated αLβ2 and αvβ3 activity. In contrast, chelerythrin did not inhibit IL-8-stimulated JY-8 adhesion and only marginally inhibited PMA-stimulated adhesion (Fig. 6⇓B) to VCAM-1 (Fig. 6⇓B). Furthermore, chelerythrin treatment increased basal level binding to VCAM-1 by approximately twofold and IL-8-induced binding by about 20%. These results indicate that α4β7 differs from αLβ2 and αVβ3 in PKC dependency.

FIGURE 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 6.

Differential effect of chelerythrin on integrin activation. JY-8 cells were pretreated with chelerythrin as described in Figure 5⇑ legend and allowed to bind to ICAM-1 (A), VCAM-1 (B), or vitronectin (C) in the presence of no agonist, IL-8, or PMA as described in Figure 3⇑. Activation by the agonists was terminated at the end of 5 min, and bound cells were quantitated. Shown is one representative of three experiments.

Discussion

We expressed functional chemoattractant receptors in the human B lymphoid cell line, JY, to compare activation as well as cytoskeletal and PKC dependencies of three integrins, αLβ2, αVβ3, and α4β7, in a common cellular context. These studies resulted in three key observations. First, stimulation of JY transfectants with the appropriate chemoattractant resulted in a rapid activation of all three integrins. Second, although their initial activation profiles were similar, a significant difference was observed in the temporal behavior of the integrins. IL-8 or FMLP induced prolonged stimulation of αLβ2 and αVβ3-dependent adhesion, whereas under similar conditions, α4β7-dependent adhesion was transient. After 5 min of IL-8 or FMLP stimulation, α4β7-mediated cell adhesion to VCAM-1 begins to decline, and by 30 min it returns to the unstimulated level. Third, the α4β7 integrin differed from αLβ2 and αVβ3 in its sensitivity to both cytochalasin D and chelerythrin treatment. While αLβ2- and αVβ3-dependent adhesion was significantly reduced by cytochalasin D, α4β7 function was enhanced under identical conditions. Chelerythrin significantly blocked αLβ2 and αVβ3 activity, whereas, at the same concentration, it enhanced α4β7 activity. These data demonstrate differential integrin regulation in JY cells.

Different temporal regulation of integrin activity by chemoattractants has been demonstrated in leukocytes isolated from blood. In human eosinophils, α4β1 activity was up-regulated in a transient manner, whereas αMβ2 activity demonstrated a prolonged increase in the presence of several chemoattractants (8). In accordance with these results, transient activation of α4β1 in Jurkat cell transfectants expressing the IL-8RA has been reported (11). A transient up-regulation of the activity of α4β7 in mouse pre-B cell transfectants expressing β7 and FPR has also been reported (11). Our results with JY cells that express endogenous α4β7 further extends this observation. Collectively, these studies demonstrate that the α4 integrins α4β1 and α4β7 are transiently activated by several chemokines/chemoattractants in a variety of cell types. Data presented here provide evidence that two chemoattractants can stimulate prolonged up-regulation of the activity of αLβ2 and αVβ3 in the same cell that demonstrates transient α4β7 activity. Thus, α4β7 may possess a different integrin-proximal mechanism of regulation. To begin to determine the mechanism for this difference, we addressed the role of F actin involvement.

Our results with cytochalasin D demonstrate a requirement of intact actin filaments in JY cells for both IL-8- and PMA-stimulated αLβ2 and αVβ3-dependent adhesion. Consistent with this finding, cytochalasin B has been reported to abolish PMA-stimulated, αLβ2-mediated aggregation of JY cells (20). At similar concentrations of cytochalasin D as that used in our assays, Kucink et al. (23) also reported inhibition of αLβ2 activity, although at lower concentrations cytochalasin D showed a stimulatory effect. Both our data and others (20) suggest that an intact actin cytoskeleton is essential for αLβ2-mediated adhesion. In addition, using CHO cells expressing a chimeric integrin, αIIbαL/β3β2, which contains the cytoplasmic tails of αL and β2 chains, a similar inhibitory effect of cytochalasin on adhesion to fibrinogen was observed, although it did not alter the high affinity status of the integrin thus implying a requirement for an αLβ2 cytoplasmic tail-cytoskeleton interaction for adhesion (24). These results contrasts with that of the activity of another β2 integrin, αMβ2 (Mac-1), in eosinophils. Chemoattractant-stimulated increase in the adhesiveness of αMβ2 in eosinophils was unaffected by cytochalasin treatment (8). Thus, even though both αLβ2 and αMβ2 share a common β-chain, they demonstrate distinct regulation. This difference may therefore be a function of their α-chains or of the different cell types utilized. Integrins that share a common α-chain, α4β1 and α4β7, may also differ in their cytochalasin sensitivity. We demonstrated that in JY cells α4β7-dependent basal level adhesion was enhanced by cytochalasin. In addition, IL-8- or PMA-induced α4β7-dependent adhesion was further augmented by cytochalasin. However, in human eosinophils the chemoattractant-stimulated increase in the activity of α4β1 was inhibited by cytochalasins, suggesting a requirement of an intact cytoskeleton (8). Thus, the cytochalasin-sensitive or -insensitive nature of α4 integrins could be attributed to the β-chains (β1 vs β7) or to differences in the cell types used in the binding studies.

In addition to F-actin, we also addressed the role of PKC in integrin activation. Chelerythrin binds to the catalytic domain of PKC and is thought to inhibit all PKC isoforms (22). IL-8 and PMA stimulate translocation of PKC from the cytosol to the membrane in JY-8 (C. Sadhu, K. Dick, and D. E. Staunton, unpublished observation). Our data show that both PMA and IL-8 stimulation of αLβ2- and αVβ3-dependent adhesion are chelerythrin sensitive, indicating a role for PKC in the signaling pathways employed by both stimuli. However, under identical conditions chelerythrin had an opposite effect on activation of α4β7. While chelerythrin inhibited αLβ2 and αVβ3 activity, it enhanced the activity of α4β7. This suggests that PKC may also function as a negative regulator of α4β7-dependent adhesion.

In summary, we have shown that in the same cellular context, α4β7 regulation differs from αLβ2 and αVβ3 in its 1) temporal pattern of activation, 2) requirement of an intact cytoskeleton, and 3) sensitivity to PKC inhibition. These results suggest the existence of integrin-specific steps in the pathways of integrin regulation. The transient nature of α4β7 adhesion and relative independence of F actin structure may reflect the distinct function of α4β7 in primary or rolling adhesion.

Acknowledgments

We thank Drs. Richard Ye and Carol Raport for the FPR and IL-8RA cDNAs; Dr. John Wilkins for the 3S3 mAb; Lee Hendrickson and Amy Wilson for excellent technical assistance; and Alice Dersham for assistance in preparing the manuscript. Helpful discussions and critical comments by Dr. David Crowe are gratefully acknowledged.

Footnotes

  • ↵1 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Chanchal Sadhu, ICOS Corp., 22021 20th Avenue SE, Bothell, WA 98021.

  • 2 Abbreviations used in this paper: PKC, protein kinase C; FPR, FMLP receptor.

  • Received October 30, 1997.
  • Accepted February 3, 1998.
  • Copyright © 1998 by The American Association of Immunologists

References

  1. ↵
    Butcher, E. C.. 1991. Leukocyte-endothelial cell recognition: three (or more) steps to specificity and diversity. Cell 67: 1033
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Springer, T. A.. 1994. Traffic signals for lymphocyte recirculation and leukocyte emigration: the multistep paradigm. Cell 76: 301
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Luscinskas, F. W., G. S. Kansas, H. Ding, P. Pizcueta, B. E. Schleiffenbaum, T. F. Tedder, M. A. Gimbrone, Jr. 1994. Monocyte rolling, arrest and spreading on IL-4-activated vascular endothelium under flow is mediated via sequential action of L-selectin, beta 1-integrins, and beta 2-integrins. J. Cell Biol. 125: 1417
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Bargatze, R. F., M. A. Jutila, E. C. Butcher. 1995. Distinct roles of L-selectin and integrins alpha 4 beta 7 and LFA-1 in lymphocyte homing to Peyer’s patch-HEV in situ: the multistep model confirmed and refined. Immunity 3: 99
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Berlin, C., R. F. Bargatze, J. J. Campbell, U. H. von Andrian, M. C. Szabo, S. R. Hasslen, R. D. Nelson, E. L. Berg, S. L. Erlandsen, E. C. Butcher. 1995. Alpha 4 integrins mediate lymphocyte attachment and rolling under physiologic flow. Cell 80: 413
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Dustin, M. L., T. A. Springer. 1989. T-cell receptor cross-linking transiently stimulates adhesiveness through LFA-1. Nature 341: 619
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Sikorski, M. A., D. E. Staunton, J. W. Mier. 1996. L-selectin crosslinking induces integrin-dependent adhesion: evidence for a signaling pathway involving PTK but not PKC. Cell Adhes. Commun. 4: 355
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Weber, C., J. Kitayama, T. A. Springer. 1996. Differential regulation of beta 1 and beta 2 integrin avidity by chemoattractants in eosinophils. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 10939
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Huber, A. R., S. L. Kunkel, R. F. Todd, III, S. J. Weiss. 1991. Regulation of transendothelial neutrophil migration by endogenous interleukin-8. Science 254: 99
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Kolanus, W., B. Seed. 1997. Integrins and inside-out signal transduction: converging signals from PKC and PIP3. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9: 725
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Campbell, J. J., S. Qin, K. B. Bacon, C. R. Mackay, E. C. Butcher. 1996. Biology of chemokine and classical chemoattractant receptors: differential requirements for adhesion-triggering versus chemotactic responses in lymphoid cells. J. Cell Biol. 134: 255
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Andrew, D. P., C. Berlin, S. Honda, T. Yoshino, A. Hamann, B. Holzmann, P. J. Kilshaw, E. C. Butcher. 1994. Distinct but overlapping epitopes are involved in alpha 4 beta 7-mediated adhesion to vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, mucosal addressin-1, fibronectin, and lymphocyte aggregation. J. Immunol. 153: 3847
    OpenUrlAbstract
  13. ↵
    Holmes, W. E., J. Lee, W. J. Kuang, G. C. Rice, W. I. Wood. 1991. Structure and functional expression of a human interleukin-8 receptor. Science 253: 1278
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Morla, A., Z. Zhang, E. Ruoslahti. 1994. Superfibronectin is a functionally distinct form of fibronectin. Nature 367: 193
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Murphy, P. M.. 1994. The molecular biology of leukocyte chemoattractant receptors. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 12: 593
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Laudanna, C., J. J. Campbell, E. C. Butcher. 1996. Role of Rho in chemoattractant-activated leukocyte adhesion through integrins. Science 271: 981
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Berlin, C., E. L. Berg, M. J. Briskin, D. P. Andrew, P. J. Kilshaw, B. Holzmann, I. L. Weissman, A. Hamann, E. C. Butcher. 1993. Alpha 4 beta 7 integrin mediates lymphocyte binding to the mucosal vascular addressin MAdCAM-1. Cell 74: 185
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Smith, J. W., D. A. Cheresh. 1990. Integrin (alpha v beta 3)-ligand interaction. Identification of a heterodimeric RGD binding site on the vitronectin receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 265: 2168
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Cooper, J. A.. 1987. Effects of cytochalasin and phalloidin on actin. J. Cell Biol. 105: 1473
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Rothlein, R., M. L. Dustin, S. D. Marlin, T. A. Springer. 1986. A human intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM-1) distinct from LFA-1. J. Immunol. 137: 1270
    OpenUrlAbstract
  21. ↵
    Kobayashi, E., H. Nakano, M. Morimoto, T. Tamaoki. 1989. Calphostin C (UCN-1028C), a novel microbial compound, is a highly potent and specific inhibitor of protein kinase C. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 159: 548
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Herbert, J. M., J. M. Augereau, J. Gleye, J. P. Maffrand. 1990. Chelerythrine is a potent and specific inhibitor of protein kinase C. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 172: 993
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Kercik, D. F., M. L. Dustin, J. M. Miller, E. J. Brown. 1996. Adhesion activating phorbol ester increases the mobility of leukocyte integrin LFA-1 in cultured lymphocytes. J. Clin. Invest. 97: 2139
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Peter, K., T. E. O’Toole. 1995. Modulation of cell adhesion by changes in alpha L beta 2 (LFA-1, CD11a/CD18) cytoplasmic domain/cytoskeleton interaction. J. Exp. Med. 181: 315
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 160, Issue 11
1 Jun 1998
  • Table of Contents
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Differential Regulation of Chemoattractant-Stimulated β2, β3, and β7 Integrin Activity
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Differential Regulation of Chemoattractant-Stimulated β2, β3, and β7 Integrin Activity
Chanchal Sadhu, Boris Masinovsky, Donald E. Staunton
The Journal of Immunology June 1, 1998, 160 (11) 5622-5628;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Differential Regulation of Chemoattractant-Stimulated β2, β3, and β7 Integrin Activity
Chanchal Sadhu, Boris Masinovsky, Donald E. Staunton
The Journal of Immunology June 1, 1998, 160 (11) 5622-5628;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Antigen presentation by dendritic cells in the aortic wall triggers T helper immune responses in atherosclerosis (54.16)
  • Eph receptors are involved in the pro-inflammatory response following spinal cord injury (54.21)
  • Liver sinusoidal endothelial cells undergo apoptosis during sepsis, leading to organ dysfunction. (54.13)
Show more Inflammation

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Public Access
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606