Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
      • Neuroimmunology: To Sense and Protect
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Regulation of Chemokine Gene Expression in Human Peripheral Blood Neutrophils Phagocytosing Microbial Pathogens

Mohamed Hachicha, Palaniswami Rathanaswami, Paul H. Naccache and Shaun R. McColl
J Immunol January 1, 1998, 160 (1) 449-454;
Mohamed Hachicha
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Palaniswami Rathanaswami
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul H. Naccache
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shaun R. McColl
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Production of chemokines (chemotactic cytokines) by neutrophils is likely to be important in the regulation of inflammation and the control of infection. In this study we show that exposure of human neutrophils to various microbial pathogens leads to the production of both macrophage inflammatory protein 1α (MIP-1α) and IL-8. The bacterial microbes, Salmonella typhimurium and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus all strongly induced both IL-8 and MIP-1α secretion, whereas Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and the opportunistic yeast Candida albicans were less potent. Saccharomyces cerevisiae and zymosan both induced IL-8 secretion but failed to stimulate that of MIP-1α. Coincubation of neutrophils with the proinflammatory cytokine TNF-α and the micro-organisms also led to differential expression of MIP-1α and IL-8. Significant enhancement of the induction of both MIP-1α and IL-8 by S. typhimurium, P. aeruginosa, and S. pneumoniae as well as by C. albicans was observed. In contrast, while IL-8 production in response to S. cerevisiae and zymosan was enhanced in the presence of TNF-α, no MIP-1α was produced. These combined results indicate that while neutrophils exposed to some micro-organisms alone or in the presence of inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α will produce both MIP-1α and IL-8, resulting in generation of signals for the recruitment of mononuclear leukocytes and neutrophils, respectively, certain types of micro-organisms can skew this response toward synthesis of IL-8.

In response to chemotactic factors and cytokines released at sites of infection, neutrophils migrate from the bloodstream through the vascular endothelium and into tissue. Once at the site, neutrophils release a variety of agents, including cytokines, in response to appropriate stimulation in an attempt to resolve the inflammatory response (1, 2). Neutrophil function at sites of infection may be modulated by various agonists, including chemotactic factors and cytokines. Additionally, a potent activation of neutrophils occurs when the cells undergo phagocytosis. It is becoming increasingly apparent that neutrophils may play a more active role in the afferent limb of the immune response than was previously believed (1, 2). It has been shown that neutrophils are capable of significant RNA and protein synthesis in response to soluble agonists, particularly the cytokines granulocyte-macrophage CSF and TNF-α (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9); however, one of the most important recent findings has been that neutrophils undergoing phagocytosis have the ability to synthesize and release large amounts of the C-X-C chemokine, IL-8 (10, 11). In fact, it appears that IL-8 may be one of the major protein products secreted by these cells, since its secretion by neutrophils is of the same magnitude as that by mononuclear phagocytes under the same conditions.

IL-8 is a prominent member of the chemokine gene superfamily. This family is composed of four structurally distinct branches, the C-X-C, C-C, C, and CX3C chemokines (also known as the α, β, γ, and δ chemokines, respectively) (12, 13, 14, 15). The C-X-C chemokine family includes the neutrophil-activating factor (IL-8), melanoma growth stimulatory activity, and neutrophil activating peptide-2. The second branch or the C-C chemokines, includes monocyte chemotactic protein-1, -2, -3, and -4; I-309; RANTES; and macrophage inflammatory protein-1α (MIP-1α)3 and -1β. The C branch currently has only one member, lymphotactin, as does the recently discovered CX3C branch, which contains neurotactin (also known as fractalkine), a molecule that appears to be a membrane-bound chemokine (16, 17). The biologic importance of the chemokine gene superfamliy stems from the fact that they attract overlapping as well as distinct leukocyte populations and are thus likely to play an important role in leukocyte trafficking. In general, the C-X-C chemokines are chemotactic and activating factors for neutrophils, whereas the C-C chemokines attract and activate monocytes, specific lymphocyte subsets, and granulocytes other than neutrophils. Lymphotactin has been reported to selectively attract CD8+ T lymphocytes (18), and although discrepancies exist, neurotactin has been reported to act as a chemoattractant for T cells, monocytes, and neutrophils (16, 17).

The observation that stimulated neutrophils are able to secrete IL-8, a chemotactic cytokine to which they can respond, implies that this cell population may be capable of directing its own recruitment to sites of inflammation and infection and thus autoamplify acute inflammatory responses to infection. In addition, recent studies show that neutrophils also produce the C-C chemokines MIP-1α and MIP-1β in response to TNF-α and LPS (19, 20), which theoretically gives them the capacity to emit signals to recruit mononuclear cells. However, our recent studies show that MIP-1α synthesis is inhibited by neutrophils phagocytosing the inflammatory microcrystals monosodium urate (MSU) and calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate (CPPD) (11), whereas under the same conditions IL-8 synthesis is enhanced. The present study was undertaken to determine whether the inhibition of MIP-1α production by MSU and CPPD aligned with enhancement of IL-8 secretion is a general phenomenon in neutrophils undergoing phagocytosis. Since a major function of the neutrophil in the innate immune system is phagocytosis of microbial pathogens during infection, we have investigated the regulation of MIP-1α and IL-8 expression by neutrophils during phagocytosis of microbial pathogens.

Materials and Methods

Materials

TNF-α was a gift from Knoll Pharmaceuticals (Whippany, NJ). TNF-α stock was stored at −80°C in PBS containing 0.01% BSA. Zymosan was obtained from Sigma/Aldrich (Castle Hill, Australia). HBSS and RPMI medium 1640 were purchased from Life Technologies (Mulgrove, Australia). Ficoll-Paque and Dextran T-500 were obtained from AMRAD/Pharmacia (Wantirna, Australia). HyClone FCS was purchased from Professional Diagnostics (Edmonton, Canada). All the above reagents contained <5 pg/ml of endotoxin as determined by the amebocyte lysate assay (BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD). Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella typhimurium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Staphylococcus epidermidis were obtained from stocks within the Department of Microbiology and Immunology at the University of Adelaide. Candida albicans and Saccharomyces cerevisiae were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD). Hybond-N membranes, [γ-32P]ATP, and [α-32P]dCTP were purchased from Amersham Canada (Oakville, Canada). All other reagents used in this study were of molecular biologic grade and were obtained from Sigma/Aldrich.

Preparation of opsonized zymosan and opsonized micro-organisms

The bacteria and yeast were harvested, resuspended in 20 ml of sterile RPMI 1640, and incubated for 1 h at 100°C. The bacteria were washed twice with sterile RPMI 1640 and counted. The pellet was resuspended in 20 ml of nondecomplemented human serum and incubated for 1 h at 37°C, and the bacteria were washed twice with RPMI 1640. The pellet was then resuspended in a sterile solution of RPMI 1640 at a concentration of 1010 microbes/ml. The same procedure was followed to opsonize zymosan at a final concentration of 30 mg/ml.

Isolation of human PMNL

Whole blood was obtained by venipuncture and collected into tubes containing heparin; following dextran sedimentation, neutrophils were purified by centrifugation on Ficoll-Paque cushions (11, 21). Erythrocytes were removed by hypotonic lysis, and the cells were resuspended in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 1% FCS at a final concentration of 107 cells/ml. One-milliliter aliquots were used for all experimental points except those involved in the generation of total RNA for Northern analysis, in which case 4-ml aliquots were used. Cell viability, as determined by trypan blue exclusion, was >98%, and the percentage of neutrophils in the cell preparations used in this study exceeded 97%. On average, the other 3% comprised other granulocytes (2%), lymphocytes (0.8%), and monocytes (at most 0.2%). Only neutrophil preparations containing <2 × 104 monocytes/107 cells were used in this study. Detectable levels of IL-8 and MIP-1α were only observed when 5 × 104 purified monocytes or more were incubated in the presence of TNF-α or phagocytic agonists. The entire separation was conducted under sterile conditions at room temperature.

Isolation of cytoplasmic RNA and Northern blot analysis

After activating cells with the desired stimuli, total RNA was prepared by the RNAzol method as recommended by the supplier, and Northern blots were performed as previously described (6, 11). The cDNA probes used in this study were radiolabeled with [α-32P]dCTP using the random primers DNA labeling system. The human MIP-1α cDNA was isolated using PCR with an antisense primer made against nucleotides 283 to 236 of the published LD78 sequence and a sense primer comprising nucleotides −19 to 3 (11). The IL-8 probe used in this study was a 244-bp PstI/EcoRI cDNA fragment representing the coding region of the IL-8 cDNA from nucleotides 49 to 293 (11). To confirm equal loading of RNA, the membranes were rehybridized with a synthetic oligonucleotide for 28S ribosomal RNA (data not shown) as described previously (22).

ELISA for IL-8 and MIP-1α

Human neutrophils were isolated and resuspended at 107 cells/ml in 4-ml sterile tubes and treated as described in the figure legends. The supernatants were collected and analyzed for chemokine content. In experiments involving the assessment of intracellular chemokine content, the cell pellets were washed three times in ice-cold sterile PBS and lysed by three consecutive freeze-thaw cycles. Levels of IL-8 and MIP-1α were assessed using ELISA kits purchased from R&D Systems, Inc. (Minneapolis, MN).

Statistical analysis

Numerical values in the figures are the levels of immunoreactive IL-8 or MIP-1α per 107 neutrophils (mean ± SEM). The data for each group were analyzed as a repeated measures analysis of variance with an unstructured covariance matrix. Statistical significance was considered to be achieved at p < 0.05.

Results

Expression of MIP-1α and IL-8 in neutrophils

To determine the basic kinetics of chemokine production by neutrophils in response to microbial pathogens, the cells were incubated with diluent, TNF-α (100 ng/ml), opsonized zymosan (1 mg/ml), or opsonized heat-killed S. aureus (10:1, bacteria:neutrophil) at 37°C for increasing periods of time. The concentration of each of these agonists was chosen from the results of previous studies (4, 6, 8, 9, 23) or from pilot experiments (not shown). A time-dependent release of MIP-1α and IL-8 was observed in response to TNF-α (Fig. 1⇓). Heat-killed opsonized S. aureus also led to a time-dependent release of both MIP-1α and IL-8. In contrast, opsonized zymosan stimulated the production of IL-8 but not MIP-1α. Opsonization enhanced the efficiency of stimulation of chemokine production, increasing both the rate and the amount of synthesis (data not shown).

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Kinetics of the production of IL-8 and MIP-1α by neutrophils in response to phagocytic agonists. Supernatants from neutrophils incubated with diluent, TNF-α (100 ng/ml), opsonized zymosan (1 mg/ml), or heat-killed opsonized S. aureus at a ratio of 10:1 (bacteria:neutrophil) were collected following different incubation periods and analyzed for presence of MIP-1α or IL-8. The results are the mean ± SEM of triplicate determinations from three separate experiments.

We next examined the effects of a range of micro-organisms on the production of MIP-1α and IL-8 by neutrophils. Neutrophils were therefore incubated with heat-killed opsonized bacterial micro-organisms at a ratio of 10:1 (micro-organisms:neutrophils) at 37°C for 24 h. The supernatants were collected and analyzed for IL-8 and MIP-1α content. In terms of IL-8 secretion, the most potent agonists were S. typhimurium, P. aeruginosa, and S. aureus (Table I⇓). Although stimulating significant IL-8 production above the control values, S. pneumoniae, S. epidermidis, C. albicans, and S. cerivisiae were less potent. As shown in Figure 1⇑, zymosan was also a potent inducer of IL-8 synthesis. As observed with IL-8 secretion, S. typhimurium, P. aeruginosa, and S. aureus were all potent inducers of MIP-1α production compared with basal levels. Moreover, as observed with IL-8 secretion, while stimulating a release of MIP-1α that was significantly greater than the control value, S. pneumoniae, S. epidermidis, and C. albicans were far less potent. In contrast to that observed with respect to IL-8 secretion, S. cerivisiae and zymosan failed to induce detectable secretion of MIP-1α and, in fact, significantly inhibited the basal release of MIP-1α.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table I.

Effect of various treatments on MIP-1α and IL-8 production by human neutrophils

Expression of MIP-1α and IL-8 mRNA in neutrophils

To determine whether the micro-organisms up-regulated MIP-1α and IL-8 expression at the mRNA level, Northern blots were performed. Neutrophils were stimulated under the conditions described above, except that the period of incubation was 3 h rather than 24 h. The cell pellets were collected, total RNA was extracted, and equal amounts of RNA were loaded onto agarose gels for transfer onto nylon filters for Northern analysis (Fig. 2⇓). According to densitometric values (data not shown), all agents except C. albicans and S. cerevisiae induced an accumulation of IL-8 mRNA greater than that of the control. However, while densitometric analysis (data not shown) indicated that S. aureus, S. pneumoniae, S. epidermidis, and P. aeruginosa stimulated an accumulation of IL-8 mRNA greater than the control levels, they were not as potent as zymosan or S. typhimurium. In contrast, all the microbes except C. albicans and S. cerivisiae induced an increase in the level of MIP-1α mRNA at least fivefold greater than the control level. Zymosan also strongly induced accumulation of MIP-1α mRNA.

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Expression of MIP-1α and IL-8 mRNA in human neutrophils. Neutrophils were incubated with diluent, TNF-α (100 ng/ml), zymosan (1 mg/ml), or heat-killed opsonized microbial pathogens, as indicated in the figure, at a ratio of 10:1 (bacteria:neutrophils) in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 1% FCS for 3 h at 37°C. Total RNA was then prepared, Northern blots were performed, and the filters were hybridized with MIP-1α and IL-8 cDNA probes as described in Materials and Methods. The filter was also hybridized with a 28S oligonucleotide probe to indicate the relative levels of total RNA present in each lane. The results shown in this figure are from one experiment, which is representative of two others performed using neutrophils from different donors with similar results.

Effect of TNF-α and micro-organisms in combination on MIP-1α and IL-8 production

Since neutrophils at sites of inflammation or infection are likely to be exposed simultaneously to several agonists, either soluble or particulate, we examined the effect of coincubation of neutrophils with TNF-α and the micro-organisms on MIP-1α and IL-8 production. Neutrophils were therefore incubated at 37°C with diluent or the micro-organisms, either alone or in combination with TNF-α for 24 h. The supernatants were collected, and the amounts of MIP-1α and IL-8 present were assessed by ELISA. As described above, S. typhimurium, P. aeruginosa, and S. aureus alone were able to induce significant release of IL-8 and MIP-1α, whereas S. pneumoniae and S. epidermidis were far less potent (Fig. 3⇓). When neutrophils were coincubated with TNF-α and the microbial pathogens, differential effects were observed on IL-8 and MIP-1α synthesis. Taking into account the effect of TNF-α alone, IL-8 and MIP-1α secretion was significantly enhanced only in response to S. typhimurium, P. aeruginosa, and S. pneumoniae. The effect of coincubation with TNF-α on the ability of zymosan, C. albicans and S. cerivisiae to induce IL-8 and MIP-1α secretion was also examined (Fig. 4⇓). Incubation in the presence of TNF-α led to greater release of IL-8 in response to C. albicans, zymosan, and S. cerivisiae. No MIP-1α was detected in the supernatants of cells incubated with TNF-α in the presence of zymosan or S. cerivisiae, and the statistical analysis showed that both these agonists significantly inhibited the production of MIP-1α induced by TNF-α.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Effect of TNF-α and bacterial micro-organisms in combination on MIP-1α and IL-8 protein secretion by neutrophils. Neutrophils were incubated in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 1% FCS for 24 h at 37°C with the indicated combinations of agonists. The same concentrations of agonists were used as indicated in Figure 1⇑ and Table I⇑. The supernatants were collected and analyzed for the presence of MIP-1α or IL-8 using specific ELISAs. The results are the mean ± SEM of triplicate determinations from three separate experiments. NS, not significantly different from control values; *, significantly greater than control values at p < 0.05.

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

Effect of TNF-α and yeast in combination on MIP-1α and IL-8 protein secretion by neutrophils. Neutrophils were incubated in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 1% FCS for 24 h at 37°C with the indicated combinations of agonists. The same concentrations of agonists were used as indicated in Figure 1⇑ and Table I⇑. The supernatants were collected and analyzed for the presence of MIP-1α or IL-8 using specific ELISAs. The results are the mean ± SEM of triplicate determinations from three separate experiments. NS, not significantly different from control values; *, significantly different from control values at p < 0.05; **, significantly lower than control values at p < 0.05.

Discussion

Phagocytosis of microbes, cell debris, and other particulate matter by neutrophils is one of the major functions of these cells and may play an important role in the development of adaptive immune responses, possibly through the release of extracellular mediators such as chemokines. We have therefore examined the regulation of chemokine gene expression in neutrophils phagocytosing bacteria and yeast.

The results of the present study show that exposure of human neutrophils to various bacteria generally leads to the production of both MIP-1α and IL-8, although the response depends on the micro-organism to which the neutrophil is exposed. The most potent agonists were the Gram-negative micro-organisms, S. typhimurium and P. aeruginosa, and S. aureus (Gram-positive). Other Gram-positive microbes, S. pneumoniae and S. epidermidis, were less potent, as was the opportunistic yeast C. albicans. While the results of the studies on bacterial microbial pathogens and C. albicans showed co-ordinated regulation of MIP-1α and IL-8 production, differential regulation of the expression of these two chemokines was observed when neutrophils were exposed to zymosan or S. cerivisiae. Zymosan and S. cerivisiae both induced the production of IL-8. However, in contrast to that observed with all the aforementioned microbial pathogens, neither zymosan nor S. cerevisiae induced detectable secretion of MIP-1α. Taken together, these results indicate that neutrophils exposed to bacterial microbial pathogens or C. albicans at sites of infection will generally release both MIP-1α and IL-8, and in view of the known biologic activities of these two chemokines (24, 25, 26), this suggests that signals for the recruitment of mononuclear leukocytes and neutrophils, respectively, will be generated. In contrast, agonists such as zymosan, S. cerevisiae, and, as previously shown, the inflammatory microcrystals MSU and CPPD (11) fail to induce MIP-1α production, thereby potentially skewing chemokine production by neutrophils toward IL-8 production, theoretically leading to the enhancement of neutrophil recruitment.

The demonstration that several of the agonists used in this study, the Gram-positive bacteria S. pneumoniae and S. epidermidis and the opportunistic yeast C. albicans, are relatively weak inducers of IL-8 and MIP-1α production in neutrophils suggests that signals in addition to phagocytosis are required for the induction of high levels of expression of the two chemokine genes. Of relevance, previous studies have demonstrated that LPS is a potent agonist of the induction of both these chemokines by neutrophils (19, 20). The Gram-negative bacteria S. typhimurium and P. aeruginosa express high levels of LPS and, as shown in the present study, are powerful agonists of both IL-8 and MIP-1α production by neutrophils. Moreover, S. aureus expresses lipoteichoic acid (LTA), which also binds to CD14. Of relevance is a recent study demonstrating the ability of LTA derived from S. aureus to induce MIP-1α production (27). However, several of our data suggest that signals other than CD14 may be involved in the stimulation of chemokine expression. For instance, the two other Gram-positive microbes used in the present study, S. pneumoniae and S. epidermidis, also possess LTA (28, 29, 30, 31) but are weak agonists of IL-8 and MIP-1α production. Moreover, zymosan (present study) and the inflammatory microcrystals MSU and CPPD (11), which do not contain LPS or LTA, are strong inducers of IL-8 production. Additional studies will be required to delineate the molecular mechanisms involved in the regulation of these two chemokine genes by the various phagocytic agonists.

At sites of infection, neutrophils are likely to be exposed to multiple agonists. Activated monocyte/macrophages and neutrophils produce TNF-α, an agent that has been shown to directly stimulate gene expression in neutrophils as well as to prime neutrophils for enhanced responsiveness to other signals (6, 32). In this report we show that coincubation of neutrophils with TNF-α enhances IL-8 and MIP-1α expression in response to S. typhimurium, P. aeruginosa, and S. pneumoniae; IL-8 production in response to zymosan and S. cerevisiae; and IL-8 and MIP-1α production in response to C. albicans. TNF-α failed to enhance IL-8 or MIP-1α expression to any of the other microbial pathogens or zymosan. Previous studies have shown that TNF-α enhances phagocytosis by neutrophils in vitro (33, 34). However, this clearly is not a general phenomenon, since in the present study only coincubation of TNF-α with S. typhimurium, P. aeruginosa, and S. pneumoniae significantly enhanced IL-8 and MIP-1α production. On the other hand, S. cerevisiae and zymosan (which is derived from S. cerevisiae) failed to induce MIP-1α production in the presence or the absence of TNF-α, thereby demonstrating that the induction of MIP-1α by TNF-α is inhibited under these conditions. These observations place zymosan and S. cerevisiae in the same category as the inflammatory microcrystals, MSU and CPPD, both of which not only fail to directly induce MIP-1α production in neutrophils, but also inhibit the ability of TNF-α to do so (11).

The inhibition of TNF-α-induced MIP-1α protein production by opsonized zymosan, S. cerevisiae, MSU, or CPPD suggests several possibilities. First, these agonists may inhibit secretion, but not translation of MIP-1α. This possibility was eliminated by assessing the intracellular level of MIP-1α. This was not altered regardless of the stimulation conditions (not shown). Second, MIP-1α may be degraded by these agonists, or they may be interfering with the detection of MIP-1α by ELISA. This possibility was also eliminated by conducting experiments in which neutrophils incubated with these agents were spiked with known quantities of MIP-1α, incubated for 24 h under the various conditions at 37°C, and then subjected to ELISA. The results of these experiments clearly showed that these agents neither interfered with the immunodetection of MIP-1α nor degraded the chemokine (not shown). A third possibility is that these phagocytic agonists may inhibit MIP-1α translation, fail to activate MIP-1α translation, or both. With respect to this possibility, while we cannot determine whether the agonists activate MIP-1α gene transcription without activating translation, it is possible that they inhibit translation of the MIP-1α gene, since coincubation of neutrophils with zymosan, S. cerevisiae, MSU, or CPPD and TNF-α effectively inhibits MIP-1α production by TNF-α. Moreover, both zymosan and S. cerevisiae induced accumulation of mRNA for MIP-1α, although no immunoreactive MIP-1α was detected. We are presently conducting studies to determine the mechanism by which such a translational inhibition may occur.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the excellent technical assistance of Mr. Sylvain Levasseur.

Footnotes

  • ↵1 This work was supported by grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia and the Medical Research Council and Arthritis Society of Canada.

  • ↵2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Shaun R. McColl, Molecular Inflammation, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Adelaide, Frome Rd., Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia. E-mail address: smccoll{at}microb.adelaide.edu.au

  • ↵3 Abbreviations used in this paper: MIP-1α, macrophage inflammatory protein-1α; MSU, monosodium urate; CPPD, calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate; LTA, lipoteichoic acid.

  • Received March 21, 1997.
  • Accepted September 22, 1997.
  • Copyright © 1998 by The American Association of Immunologists

References

  1. ↵
    McColl, S. R., H. J. Showell. 1994. Neutrophil-derived inflammatory mediators. T. J. Williams, and P. G. Helliwell, eds. In Immunopharmacology of the Neutrophil Vol. 4: 95 Academic Press, London.
  2. ↵
    Lloyd, A. R., J. J. Oppenheim. 1992. Poly’s lament: the neglected role of the neutrophil in the afferent limb of the immune response. Immunol. Today 13: 169
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Loetscher, P., M. Seitz, I. Clark Lewis, M. Baggiolini, B. Moser. 1994. Monocyte chemotactic proteins MCP-1, MCP-2, and MCP-3 are major attractants for human CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes. FASEB J. 8: 1055
    OpenUrlAbstract
  4. ↵
    Beaulieu, A. D., R. Paquin, P. Rathanaswami, S. R. McColl. 1992. Nuclear signaling in human neutrophils: stimulation of RNA synthesis is a response to a limited number of proinflammatory agonists. J. Biol. Chem. 267: 426
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Beaulieu, A. D., S. R. McColl. 1994. Differential expression of two major cytokines produced by neutrophils, interleukin-8 and the interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, in neutrophils isolated from the synovial fluid and peripheral blood of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 37: 855
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    McColl, S. R., R. Paquin, C. Menard, A. D. Beaulieu. 1992. Human neutrophils produce high levels of the interleukin 1 receptor antagonist in response to granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor and tumor necrosis factor alpha. J. Exp. Med. 176: 593
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    McColl, S. R., R. Paquin, A. D. Beaulieu. 1990. Selective synthesis and secretion of a 23 kD protein by neutrophils following stimulation with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and tumor necrosis factor. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 172: 1209
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    Pouliot, M., P. P. McDonald, P. Borgeat, S. R. McColl. 1994. Granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor stimulates the expression of the 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein (FLAP) in human neutrophils. J. Exp. Med. 179: 1225
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Pouliot, M., P. P. McDonald, L. Khamzina, P. Borgeat, S. R. McColl. 1994. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor enhances 5-lipoxygenase levels in human polymorphonuclear leukocytes. J. Immunol. 152: 851
    OpenUrlAbstract
  10. ↵
    Bazzoni, F., M. A. Castella, F. Rossi, M. Ceska, B. DeWald, M. Baggiolini. 1991. Phagocytosing neutrophils produce and release high amounts of the neutrophil-activating peptide-1/interleukin 8. J. Exp. Med. 173: 771
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Hachicha, M., P. H. Naccache, S. R. McColl. 1995. Inflammatory microcrystals differentially regulate the secretion of macrophage inflammatory protein 1 and interleukin 8 by human neutrophils: a possible mechanism for neutrophil recruitment to sites of inflammation in synovitis. J. Exp. Med. 182: 2019
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Baggiolini, M., B. Dewald, B. Moser. 1994. Interleukin-8 and related chemotactic cytokines: CXC and CC chemokines. Adv. Immunol. 55: 97
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. ↵
    Schall, T. J., K. B. Bacon. 1994. Chemokines, leukocyte trafficking, and inflammation. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 6: 865
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Schall, T. J.. 1991. Biology of the RANTES/SIS cytokine family. Cytokine 3: 165
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Oppenheim, J. J., C. O. Zachariae, N. Mukaida, K. Matsushima. 1991. Properties of the novel proinflammatory supergene “intercrine” cytokine family. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 9: 617
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Bazan, J. F., K. B. Bacon, G. Hardiman, W. Wang, K. Soo, D. Rossi, D. R. Greaves, A. Zlotnik, T. J. Schall. 1997. A new class of membrane-bound chemokine with a CX(3)C motif. Nature 385: 640
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Pan, Y., C. Lloyd, H. Zhou, S. Dolich, J. Deeds, J.-A. Gonzalo, J. Vath, M. Gosselin, J. Ma, B. Dussault, E. Woolf, G. Alperin, J. Culpepper, J. C. Gutierrez-Ramos, D. Gearing. 1997. Neurotactin, a membrane-anchored chemokine upregulated in brain inflammation. Nature 387: 611
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Kelner, G. S., J. Kennedy, K. B. Bacon, S. Kleyensteuber, D. A. Largaespada, N. A. Jenkins, N. G. Copeland, J. F. Bazan, K. W. Moore, T. J. Schall, A. Zlotnick. 1994. Lymphotactin: a cytokine that represents a new class of chemokine. Science 266: 1395
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Kasama, T., R. M. Streiter, T. J. Standiford, M. D. Burdick, S. L. Kunkel. 1993. Expression and regulation of human neutrophil-derived macrophage inflammatory protein-1. J. Exp. Med. 178: 63
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Kasama, T., R. M. Strieter, N. W. Lukacs, M. D. Burdick, S. L. Kunkel. 1994. Regulation of neutrophil-derived chemokine expression by IL-10. J. Immunol. 152: 3559
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Boyum, A.. 1968. Isolation of mononuclear cells and granulocytes from human blood. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 97: 77
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    Rathanaswami, P., M. Hachicha, M. Sadick, T. J. Schall, S. R. McColl. 1993. Expression of the cytokine RANTES in human rheumatoid synovial fibroblasts: differential regulation of RANTES and interleukin-8 genes by inflammatory cytokines. J. Biol. Chem. 268: 5834
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    McColl, S. R., J. F. DiPersio, A. C. Caon, P. Ho, P. H. Naccache. 1991. Involvement of tyrosine kinases in the activation of human peripheral blood neutrophils by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Blood 78: 1842
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Peveri, P., A. Walz, B. Dewald, M. Baggiolini. 1988. A novel neutrophil activating factor produced by human mononuclear phagocytes. J. Exp. Med. 167: 1547
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Taub, D. D., K. Conlon, A. R. Lloyd, J. J. Oppenheim, D. J. Kelvin. 1993. Preferential migration of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in response to MIP-1. Science 260: 355
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Schall, T. J., K. Bacon, R. D. Camp, J. W. Kaspari, D. V. Goeddel. 1993. Human macrophage inflammatory protein alpha (MIP-1 alpha) and MIP-1 beta chemokines attract distinct populations of lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 177: 1821
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Danforth, J. M., R. M. Streiter, S. L. Kunkel, D. A. Arenberg, G. M. VanOtteren, T. J. Standiford. 1995. Macrophage inflammatory protein-1 in vivo and in vitro: the role of lipotechoic acid. Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 74: 77
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    Keller, R., W. Fischer, R. Keist, S. Bassetti. 1992. Macrophage response to bacteria: induction of marked secretory and cellular activities by lipoteichoic acids. Infect. Immun. 60: 3664
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    Fischer, W., T. Behr, R. Hartmann, J. P. Katalinic, H. Egge. 1993. Teichoic acid and lipoteichoic acid of Streptococcus pneumoniae possess identical chain structures: a reinvestigation of teichoid acid (C polysaccharide). Eur. J. Biochem. 215: 851
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Wakabayashi, G., J. A. Gelfand, W. K. Jung, R. J. Connolly, J. F. Burke, C. A. Dinarello. 1991. Staphylococcus epidermidis induces complement activation, tumor necrosis factor and interleukin-1, a shock-like state and tissue injury in rabbits without endotoxemia: comparison to Escherichia coli. J. Clin. Invest. 87: 1925
  31. ↵
    Chugh, T. D., G. J. Burns, H. J. Shuhaiber, G. M. Bahr. 1990. Adherence of Staphylococcus epidermidis to fibrin-platelet clots in vitro mediated by lipoteichoic acid. Infect. Immun. 58: 315
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    McColl, S. R., D. Beauseigle, C. Gilbert, P. H. Naccache. 1990. Priming of the human neutrophil respiratory burst by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and tumor necrosis factor-alpha involves regulation at a post-cell surface receptor level: enhancement of the effect of agents which directly activate G proteins. J. Immunol. 145: 3047
    OpenUrlAbstract
  33. ↵
    Klebanoff, S. J., M. A. Vadas, J. M. Harlan, L. H. Sparks, J. R. Gamble, J. M. Agosti, A. M. Waltersdorph. 1986. Stimulation of neutrophils by tumor necrosis factor. J. Immunol. 136: 4220
    OpenUrlAbstract
  34. ↵
    Shalaby, M. R., B. B. Aggarwal, E. Rinderknecht, L. P. Svedersky, B. S. Finkle, M. A. Palladino, Jr. 1985. Activation of human polymorphonuclear neutrophil functions by interferon-gamma and tumor necrosis factors. J. Immunol. 135: 2069
    OpenUrlAbstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 160, Issue 1
1 Jan 1998
  • Table of Contents
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Regulation of Chemokine Gene Expression in Human Peripheral Blood Neutrophils Phagocytosing Microbial Pathogens
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Regulation of Chemokine Gene Expression in Human Peripheral Blood Neutrophils Phagocytosing Microbial Pathogens
Mohamed Hachicha, Palaniswami Rathanaswami, Paul H. Naccache, Shaun R. McColl
The Journal of Immunology January 1, 1998, 160 (1) 449-454;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Regulation of Chemokine Gene Expression in Human Peripheral Blood Neutrophils Phagocytosing Microbial Pathogens
Mohamed Hachicha, Palaniswami Rathanaswami, Paul H. Naccache, Shaun R. McColl
The Journal of Immunology January 1, 1998, 160 (1) 449-454;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Antigen presentation by dendritic cells in the aortic wall triggers T helper immune responses in atherosclerosis (54.16)
  • Eph receptors are involved in the pro-inflammatory response following spinal cord injury (54.21)
  • Liver sinusoidal endothelial cells undergo apoptosis during sepsis, leading to organ dysfunction. (54.13)
Show more Inflammation

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • FAR 889
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606