Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Inhibition of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by MHC class II binding competitor peptides depends on the relative MHC binding affinity of the disease-inducing peptide.

M H Wauben, I Joosten, A Schlief, R van der Zee, C J Boog and W van Eden
J Immunol April 15, 1994, 152 (8) 4211-4220;
M H Wauben
Institute of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
I Joosten
Institute of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A Schlief
Institute of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R van der Zee
Institute of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C J Boog
Institute of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W van Eden
Institute of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Blocking of the Ag presentation function of MHC molecules by competitor peptides has been proposed as a potential immunotherapy for MHC-associated autoimmune diseases. Despite the fact that successful inhibition of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) by coimmunization with competitor peptides had been achieved, it remained questionable whether the in vivo activity of such peptides was solely the result of MHC blockade. In the peptide MBP72-85-induced EAE model in Lewis rats, we designed a single amino acid-substituted analogue of MBP72-85 with a superior MHC binding capacity, and with the capacity to activate encephalitogenic MBP72-85-specific T cells. Subsequently, two well-defined competitor peptides, one EAE related and one non-EAE related, were studied for their respective efficacies to inhibit the in vitro proliferation of an encephalitogenic T cell clone induced by the original MBP72-85 or the superior MHC binding analogue peptide. It appeared that the response to MBP72-85 was inhibited very efficiently by both competitor peptides, whereas the response to the superior MHC binding analogue peptide was not. Co-immunization of either the related or non-related competitor peptide together with MBP72-85 inhibited EAE induction in a concentration-dependent manner. In such protected rats, polyclonal T cell responses against MBP72-85 were dramatically decreased. However, EAE induced by the stronger MHC binding MBP72-85 analogue could not be inhibited by either of the competitor peptides. Moreover, in these rats, T cell priming for both MBP72-85 and the MBP72-85 analogue was not inhibited. These results show that competition for MHC binding in vivo could lead to inhibition of EAE induction.

  • Copyright © 1994 by American Association of Immunologists

Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 1 day for US$37.50

Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 152, Issue 8
15 Apr 1994
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Inhibition of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by MHC class II binding competitor peptides depends on the relative MHC binding affinity of the disease-inducing peptide.
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Inhibition of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by MHC class II binding competitor peptides depends on the relative MHC binding affinity of the disease-inducing peptide.
M H Wauben, I Joosten, A Schlief, R van der Zee, C J Boog, W van Eden
The Journal of Immunology April 15, 1994, 152 (8) 4211-4220;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Inhibition of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by MHC class II binding competitor peptides depends on the relative MHC binding affinity of the disease-inducing peptide.
M H Wauben, I Joosten, A Schlief, R van der Zee, C J Boog, W van Eden
The Journal of Immunology April 15, 1994, 152 (8) 4211-4220;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • FAR 889
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2022 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606