Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
      • Neuroimmunology: To Sense and Protect
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Neutrophil-activating peptides NAP-2 and IL-8 bind to the same sites on neutrophils but interact in different ways. Discrepancies in binding affinities, receptor densities, and biologic effects.

F Petersen, H D Flad and E Brandt
J Immunol March 1, 1994, 152 (5) 2467-2478;
F Petersen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H D Flad
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E Brandt
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

IL-8 and the neutrophil-activating peptide 2 (NAP-2) are members of the chemokine family of host defense cytokines. Although IL-8 was shown to interact with two different high affinity receptors on polymorphonuclear neutrophil granulocytes (PMN), direct demonstration of specific binding sites for NAP-2 is difficult, because the NAP-2 molecule lacks iodinable side chains. Here we present a modified labeling procedure for the chemokine that does not affect its biologic activity. The 125I-labeled NAP-2 specifically bound to PMN with two different affinities (KD = 0.65 and 22.4 nM). We observed complete cross-competition of unlabeled IL-8 with 125I-labeled-NAP-2 and of unlabeled NAP-2 with 125I-labeled IL-8, indicating the absence of monospecific binding sites for either chemokine. However, in contrast to former work by others, the total number of accessible sites was considerably lower for NAP-2 (13,000/cell) than for IL-8 (59,000/cell). In addition, PMN prepared from heparinized blood expressed significantly more receptors for NAP-2 than cells prepared from citrated blood, whereas receptor numbers for IL-8 were unchanged. Desensitization experiments suggested a regulatory role for the NAP-2 high affinity site. Short-term priming of PMN with a nonstimulatory dose of NAP-2 (or MGSA) but not with IL-8 led to drastic down-regulation of the subsequent degranulation response, challenged by higher dosages of NAP-2, MGSA, or IL-8. Reduced functional responsiveness of cells correlated with the rapid down-regulation and internalization of NAP-2 and IL-8 high affinity binding sites. Thus, our data indicate that chemokines could mediate by individual modes of interaction with common receptor's different biologic functions.

  • Copyright © 1994 by American Association of Immunologists
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 152, Issue 5
1 Mar 1994
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Neutrophil-activating peptides NAP-2 and IL-8 bind to the same sites on neutrophils but interact in different ways. Discrepancies in binding affinities, receptor densities, and biologic effects.
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Neutrophil-activating peptides NAP-2 and IL-8 bind to the same sites on neutrophils but interact in different ways. Discrepancies in binding affinities, receptor densities, and biologic effects.
F Petersen, H D Flad, E Brandt
The Journal of Immunology March 1, 1994, 152 (5) 2467-2478;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Neutrophil-activating peptides NAP-2 and IL-8 bind to the same sites on neutrophils but interact in different ways. Discrepancies in binding affinities, receptor densities, and biologic effects.
F Petersen, H D Flad, E Brandt
The Journal of Immunology March 1, 1994, 152 (5) 2467-2478;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • FAR 889
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606