Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Chemoattraction of neutrophils by substance P and transforming growth factor-beta 1 is inadequately explained by current models of lipid remodeling.

K A Haines, S L Kolasinski, B N Cronstein, J Reibman, L I Gold and G Weissmann
J Immunol August 1, 1993, 151 (3) 1491-1499;
K A Haines
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S L Kolasinski
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B N Cronstein
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J Reibman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L I Gold
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G Weissmann
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

"Classical" chemoattractants, such as FMLP, C5a, or leukotriene B4, not only elicit directed motility but also activate neutrophils (degranulation, release of active oxygen species). Signal transduction after ligation of receptors for these classical chemoattractants is mediated by pertussis toxin (PT)-sensitive, heterotrimeric G proteins and the early production of lipid messengers via phospholipases. In contrast, we have previously shown that substance P (SP) and transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-beta 1) are "pure" chemoattractants in that they elicit chemotaxis without activating neutrophils. Paradoxically, pure chemoattractants also activate G proteins (plasmalemmal GTPase activity) without eliciting increments in cytosolic calcium ([Ca]i) and thus inositol trisphosphate. We therefore determined lipid remodeling and signal transduction in response to pure chemoattractants. Increments in plasmalemmal GTPase activated by SP (0.1 microM) and TGF-beta 1 (40 fM), like that after FMLP, were PT-sensitive (SP = 6.6 +/- 2 pm/mg/min vs SP + PT = 1.1 +/- 0.9 over basal activity; TGF-beta 1 = 4.3 +/- 1.6 vs TGF-beta 1 + PT = 2.3 +/- 0.9). In parallel, treatment of PMN with PT (1 microgram/ml, 30 min) inhibited chemotaxis (under agarose) after FMLP (2175 +/- 176 (SEM) microns vs 726 +/- 267) and SP (411 +/- 99 microns vs 103 +/- 62 microns) and TGF-beta 1 (40 fM, 375 +/- 53 microns vs 83 +/- 47). However, G proteins coupled to receptors for SP and TGF-beta 1, unlike FMLP, did not appear to be linked to phospholipases in that neither increments in diacylglycerol were detected after receptor ligation (FMLP = 152 +/- 22% resting levels; SP = 101 +/- 5%; TGF-beta 1 = 105 +/- 4%) nor was alkylacylglycerol increased by exposure to SP or TGF-beta 1 (SP = 92 +/- 4%; TGF-beta 1 = 101 +/- 8%; FMLP = 226 +/- 40%). Moreover, polymorphonuclear leukocytes failed to generate phosphatidates (PA) of either species after SP (DA-PA = 79 +/- 9% resting at 60 s; EA-PA = 103 +/- 4%) or TGF-beta 1 (DA-PA = 101 +/- 5%; EA-PA = 98 +/- 9%) in contrast to FMLP (DA-PA = 155 +/- 22%; EA-PA = 149 +/- 16%). The data clearly contravene the current dogma that all chemoattractants use inositol trisphosphate and diglycerides as intracellular signals and suggest the presence of a unique subset of PT-sensitive G proteins, not coupled to "classical" phospholipases, transduce chemoattraction.

  • Copyright © 1993 by American Association of Immunologists
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 151, Issue 3
1 Aug 1993
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Chemoattraction of neutrophils by substance P and transforming growth factor-beta 1 is inadequately explained by current models of lipid remodeling.
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Chemoattraction of neutrophils by substance P and transforming growth factor-beta 1 is inadequately explained by current models of lipid remodeling.
K A Haines, S L Kolasinski, B N Cronstein, J Reibman, L I Gold, G Weissmann
The Journal of Immunology August 1, 1993, 151 (3) 1491-1499;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Chemoattraction of neutrophils by substance P and transforming growth factor-beta 1 is inadequately explained by current models of lipid remodeling.
K A Haines, S L Kolasinski, B N Cronstein, J Reibman, L I Gold, G Weissmann
The Journal of Immunology August 1, 1993, 151 (3) 1491-1499;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • FAR 889
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2022 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606