Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Carrier Function in Anti-Hapten Antibody Responses

VI. Establishment of Experimental Conditions for Either Inhibitory or Enhancing Influences of Carrier-Specific Cells on Antibody Production

David H. Katz, William E. Paul and Baruj Benacerraf
J Immunol January 1, 1973, 110 (1) 107-117;
David H. Katz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William E. Paul
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Baruj Benacerraf
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Guinea pigs primed with 2,4-dinitrophenyl (DNP)-ovalbumin (OVA) will develop markedly enhanced secondary anti-DNP antibody responses to the heterologous conjugate DNP-bovine γ globulin (BGG) provided that they have been supplementally immunized with appropriate amounts of BGG. This phenomenon reflects the enhancing influence of BGG-specific thymus-derived (T) lymphocytes on anti-DNP antibody production. The present studies demonstrate that such enhancing T cell influences can be abolished by the following manipulations: 1) simultaneous supplemental immunization with two unrelated proteins such as BGG and keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) or glucose oxidase (GO) significantly diminished the secondary anti-DNP response upon challenge with a DNP-conjugate of one of the carriers employed; 2) the intraperitoneal injection of soluble BGG, in the appropriate dose range, 1 day before secondary DNP-BGG challenge completely abolishes the anti-DNP response regardless of whether BGG alone or BGG together with KLH had been used in the supplemental immunization; 3) a challenge with soluble KLH 1 day before secondary challenge with DNP-BGG inhibits the anti-DNP response provided KLH had been administered simultaneously with BGG in the supplemental immunization. The failure to observe similar suppression when KLH was replaced by a copolymer of d-glutamic acid and d-lysine (D-GL) which is nonimmunogenic for T cells indicates that this suppression is a reflection of a T cell-mediated influence.

We have interpreted these observations to indicate the production of soluble inhibitory mediators in phenomena such as antigen-induced suppression (“antigenic competition”) and, furthermore, that the elaboration of such mediators is most likely by T lymphocytes. Reasons for favoring the concept that enhancing or inhibitory influences on antibody production represent two ends of the spectrum of regulation exerted, perhaps, by the same T cell product are discussed.

  • Received August 9, 1972.
  • Copyright, 1972, by The Williams & Wilkins Company
  • Copyright © 1973 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 1 day for US$37.50

Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 110, Issue 1
1 Jan 1973
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Carrier Function in Anti-Hapten Antibody Responses
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Carrier Function in Anti-Hapten Antibody Responses
David H. Katz, William E. Paul, Baruj Benacerraf
The Journal of Immunology January 1, 1973, 110 (1) 107-117;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Carrier Function in Anti-Hapten Antibody Responses
David H. Katz, William E. Paul, Baruj Benacerraf
The Journal of Immunology January 1, 1973, 110 (1) 107-117;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Ligand-Activated T Cell Growth Factor-Induced Proliferation: Absorption of T Cell Growth Factor by Activated T Cells
  • Role of Nominal Antigen and Ia Antigen in the Binding of Antigen-Specific T Lymphocytes to Macrophages
  • Role of Self Carriers in the Immune Response and Tolerance
Show more Cellular Immunology

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • FAR 889
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2022 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606