Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Type I IFNs and IL-18 Regulate the Antiviral Response of Primary Human γδ T Cells against Dendritic Cells Infected with Dengue Virus

Chen-Yu Tsai, Ka Hang Liong, Matilda Gertrude Gunalan, Na Li, Daniel Say Liang Lim, Dale A. Fisher, Paul A. MacAry, Yee Sin Leo, Siew-Cheng Wong, Kia Joo Puan and Soon Boon Justin Wong
J Immunol April 15, 2015, 194 (8) 3890-3900; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1303343
Chen-Yu Tsai
Department of Microbiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117545, Republic of Singapore;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ka Hang Liong
Department of Microbiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117545, Republic of Singapore;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matilda Gertrude Gunalan
Department of Microbiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117545, Republic of Singapore;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Na Li
Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology, Singapore 138602, Republic of Singapore;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel Say Liang Lim
Department of Microbiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117545, Republic of Singapore;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dale A. Fisher
Division of Infectious Diseases, National University Hospital, Singapore 119074, Republic of Singapore;Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119228, Republic of Singapore;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul A. MacAry
Department of Microbiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117545, Republic of Singapore;Immunology Programme, Life Science Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117456, Republic of Singapore;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yee Sin Leo
Department of Infectious Diseases, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore 308433, Republic of Singapore;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Siew-Cheng Wong
Singapore Immunology Network, Agency for Science Technology and Research, Singapore 138648, Republic of Singapore; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kia Joo Puan
Singapore Immunology Network, Agency for Science Technology and Research, Singapore 138648, Republic of Singapore; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Soon Boon Justin Wong
Department of Microbiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117545, Republic of Singapore;Immunology Programme, Life Science Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117456, Republic of Singapore;Department of Pathology, National University Hospital, Singapore 119074, Republic of Singapore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    γδ T cells in peripheral blood are activated during acute dengue fever. Blood from 11 patients diagnosed with acute dengue fever (positive for either dengue IgM or plasma dengue viral RNA) was obtained within 8 d of the onset of fever and analyzed using flow cytometry. Blood from 11 age- and sex-matched healthy nonfebrile individuals served as experimental controls. The gating strategy used to define γδ T cells is shown in Supplemental Fig. 1A. “Fluorescence minus one” (FMO) staining controls were used to set the boundary gates between positive and negative populations. (A) The frequency of CD38+ cells among CD3+ γδ TCR+ cells in PBMC from patients with acute dengue fever or healthy nonfebrile individuals. The contour plots depict expression of CD38 on γδ T cells from a representative patient with acute dengue fever (lower left panel) and from a representative nonfebrile individual (lower right panel). (B) Frequency of CD69+ γδ T cells and representative expression of CD69 on γδ T cells in PBMC from patients with acute dengue fever or from nonfebrile controls. (C) Geometric mean fluorescence intensity of staining for CD107a among γδ T cells in PBMC from patients with acute dengue fever or nonfebrile controls. Representative expression of CD107a on γδ T cells from a patient with acute dengue fever, a nonfebrile individual, and the FMO staining control are also depicted. (D) Frequency of Ki-67+ γδ T cells and representative expression of Ki-67 on γδ T cells in PBMC from patients with acute dengue fever or from nonfebrile controls. For all summary plots, the horizontal lines represent the median and interquartile ranges. **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001 unpaired t test.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Primary γδ T cells in PBMC respond to autologous DC infected with DV. DC were infected with DV at MOI = 1 and, at 24 h postinfection, were cocultured in vitro for an additional 4 h with autologous PBMC. The response of CD3+ γδ TCR+ cells was analyzed by flow cytometry. The gating strategy used to define γδ T cells is shown in Supplemental Fig. 1A. DC exposed to heat-inactivated DV (i.e., mock-infected DC) or DC that had not been exposed to any DV (i.e., uninfected DC) served as experimental controls. The response of γδ T cells in PBMC not cocultured with DC (PBMC only) is also shown. (A) The frequency of IFN-γ+ cells among CD3+ γδ TCR+ cells. Contour plots depict representative IFN-γ responses of γδ T cells in PBMC cocultured with DV-infected DC or with mock-infected DC. (B) Frequency of CD69+ γδ T cells and representative CD69 expression on γδ T cells in PBMC cocultured with DV-infected DC or mock-infected DC. (C) Summary of CD107a mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values and representative expression of this marker on γδ T cells in PBMC cocultured with DV-infected DC or mock-infected DC. Data in (A)–(C) are the mean of six independent experiments, each using PBMC from different donors. Error bars denote the SD. *p < 0.05, ****p < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA with Holm–Sidak post hoc test. (D) The Vδ2+ subset represents the majority of IFN-γ–producing γδ T cells in PBMC that respond to DV-infected DC. PBMC were cocultured with autologous DV-infected DC, as described for (A)–(C), using individuals with a balanced distribution of Vδ2+ and non-Vδ2+ γδ T cells in their blood. The FACS gating strategy used and the distribution of Vδ2+ and non-Vδ2+ γδ T cells are depicted. Results from four independent experiments using PBMC from different donors are depicted. p = 0.72, paired t test. (E) The frequency of IFN-γ+ cells among CD3+ γδ TCR+ Vδ2+ cells in PBMC. Contour plots depict representative responses to DV-infected DC or mock-infected DC. (F) The frequency of IFN-γ+ cells among CD3+ γδ TCR+ Vδ2− cells in PBMC. Contour plots depict representative responses to DV-infected DC or mock-infected DC. (G) Relative proportion of Vδ2+ versus non-Vδ2+ cells among CD3+ γδ TCR+ cells in PBMC that produced IFN-γ when cocultured with DV-infected DC. The FACS gating strategy and contour plot showing representative response are depicted in Supplemental Fig. 1B. Data in (E)–(G) are the mean of four independent experiments using PBMC from different donors. The error bars denote SD. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 paired t test. ns, not significant.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    The IFN-γ response of γδ T cells to DV-infected DC is dependent on type I IFN, IL-18, and the ATP-P2X7 receptor pathway. DC that were infected with DV (as described in Fig. 2) were pretreated for 30 min with the indicated cytokine inhibitors, blocking Abs, or isotype-control Abs and then cocultured with autologous PBMC for an additional 4 h. For blocking the P2X7 receptor, DC were pretreated with 100 μM of 15D for 30 min prior to coculture with PBMC, and the final concentration of 15D in coculture was maintained at 100 μM. The IFN-γ response of CD3+ γδ TCR+ cells was analyzed by flow cytometry using the gating strategy depicted in Supplemental Fig. 1B, unless otherwise stated. (A) Blockade of type I IFN with recombinant B18R protein derived from vaccinia virus or Ab-mediated neutralization of IL-18 or TNF-α. (B) Expression of IL-18Rα and IFN-γ on γδ T cells in PBMC cocultured with DV-infected DC. (C) Antagonizing the P2X7 receptor with 15D. The IFN-γ response of γδ T cells was analyzed by flow cytometry using the gating strategy depicted in Supplemental Fig. 4A. (D) Blockade of IL-1 with rIL-1R antagonist. (E) Ab-mediated blockade of IL-7. (F) Ab-mediated blockade of IL-12 or IL-15. (G) Inhibition of the mevalonate pathway of IPP synthesis with mevastatin. Data in (A), (B), and (D)–(G) are the mean value obtained from three independent experiments using blood from different donors, whereas data in (C) are from four independent experiments using blood from different donors. Error bars denote the SD. **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001 one-way ANOVA with Holm–Sidak post hoc test. ns, not significant.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    The IFN-γ response of purified γδ T cells to DV-infected DC is diminished compared with the response of γδ T cells within unfractionated PBMC, which is associated with diminished IL-18 levels in the former cultures; conversely, exogenous IL-18 augments the anti-DV responses of purified γδ T cells. (A) DC infected with DV, as described in Fig. 2, were cocultured with purified autologous primary γδ T cells for 4 h. The IFN-γ response of γδ T cells was analyzed by flow cytometry. Mock-infected DC or uninfected DC served as experimental controls. Data shown are the mean obtained from five independent experiments, each using cells from different donors. Error bars represent the SD. (B) Less IL-18 is present in the supernatant of cocultures containing DV-infected DC and purified γδ T cells compared with cocultures of DV-infected DC with PBMC. DV-infected DC were cocultured with purified autologous γδ T cells or unfractionated PBMC. Culture supernatant was harvested after 24 h for the measurement of IL-18 by ELISA. Cocultures containing mock-infected DC served as experimental controls. (C) Exogenous IL-18 is sufficient to increase the IFN-γ response of purified γδ T cells to DV-infected DC. DV-infected DC were cocultured with purified autologous γδ T cells for 4 h in the presence of either rIL-18 (100 ng/ml) or rIFN-α (1,000 or 10,000 U/ml), added at the time of coculture. Cocultures containing mock-infected DC served as experimental controls. (D) γδ T cells primed overnight with IL-18 showed increased ability to kill DV-infected DC. DV-infected DC were loaded with BATDA reagent and cocultured for 2.5 h with either purified autologous γδ T cells that had been primed for 16 h with IL-18 (100 ng/ml) or γδ T cells that had not been exposed to exogenous IL-18, both at an E:T ratio of 10. The percentage of specific lysis was determined as described in Materials and Methods. Mock-infected DC cocultured with γδ T cells served as experimental controls. Data in (B)–(D) are the mean obtained from four independent experiments, each using cells from different donors. Error bars represent the SD. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 one-way ANOVA with Holm–Sidak post hoc test. ns, not significant.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    Depletion of monocytes from PBMC diminished the IFN-γ response of γδ T cells to DV-infected DC and was associated with reduced IL-18 levels in culture supernatant. DC infected with DV (as described in Fig. 2) were cocultured with autologous PBMC or PBL for 4 h. Mock-infected DC cocultured with PBMC served as experimental controls. (A) The IFN-γ response of γδ T cells was analyzed by flow cytometry using the gating strategy depicted in Supplemental Fig. 1B. Data are mean values obtained from four independent experiments, each using cells from different donors, Error bars represent the SD. (B) DV-infected DC were cocultured with autologous PBMC or PBL. After 24 h, culture supernatant was harvested for the measurement of IL-18 by ELISA. Mock-infected DC cocultured with PBMC served as controls. The mean result from 13 experiments is depicted, each using cells from different donors. Error bars represent the SD. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 one-way ANOVA with Holm–Sidak post hoc test.

  • FIGURE 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 6.

    CD16+ monocytes augmented the IFN-γ response of purified γδ T cells against DV-infected DC. DC infected with DV (as outlined in Fig. 2) were cocultured for an additional 4 h with purified autologous primary γδ T cells, alone or together with CD14+ or CD16+ autologous monocytes that had been isolated as described in Materials and Methods. Mock-infected DC cocultured with purified γδ T cells alone or with γδ T cells and the indicated subset of monocytes served as experimental controls. IFN-γ (A) and CD107a (B) responses of γδ T cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. The mean values obtained from four independent experiments that each used cells from different donors are depicted. Error bars represent SD. *p < 0.05 one-way ANOVA with Holm–Sidak post hoc test. ns, not significant.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table I. Clinical characteristics of 11 patients with acute DV and expression of markers of activation, degranulation, and proliferation on γδ T cells in blood samples obtained from these individuals during acute infection
    GenderAge (y)Fever DaysRT-PCRAnti-DV IgMAnti-DV IgGCD38 (%)CD69 (%)CD107a (MFI)Ki-67 (%)
    Male225−++85.948.06696.6
    Male304−++60.59.67168.4
    Female334+ (DV1)XX49.143.98242.3
    Female344+ (DV2)XX92.721.16975.4
    Male244+ (DV2)XX88.220.27900.0
    Male533+ (DV4)XX43.020.69352.6
    Male248−+−76.033.364813.9
    Female297−++92.524.445225.6
    Male268−+−58.510.360912.9
    Female317−++61.813.06114.4
    Female418−++83.923.773823.7
    • MFI, mean fluorescence intensity; −, negative reaction; +, positive reaction; X, test not performed.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Data Supplement

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Figures 1 (PDF)
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 194 (8)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 194, Issue 8
15 Apr 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Type I IFNs and IL-18 Regulate the Antiviral Response of Primary Human γδ T Cells against Dendritic Cells Infected with Dengue Virus
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
Citation Tools
Type I IFNs and IL-18 Regulate the Antiviral Response of Primary Human γδ T Cells against Dendritic Cells Infected with Dengue Virus
Chen-Yu Tsai, Ka Hang Liong, Matilda Gertrude Gunalan, Na Li, Daniel Say Liang Lim, Dale A. Fisher, Paul A. MacAry, Yee Sin Leo, Siew-Cheng Wong, Kia Joo Puan, Soon Boon Justin Wong
The Journal of Immunology April 15, 2015, 194 (8) 3890-3900; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1303343

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Type I IFNs and IL-18 Regulate the Antiviral Response of Primary Human γδ T Cells against Dendritic Cells Infected with Dengue Virus
Chen-Yu Tsai, Ka Hang Liong, Matilda Gertrude Gunalan, Na Li, Daniel Say Liang Lim, Dale A. Fisher, Paul A. MacAry, Yee Sin Leo, Siew-Cheng Wong, Kia Joo Puan, Soon Boon Justin Wong
The Journal of Immunology April 15, 2015, 194 (8) 3890-3900; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1303343
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosures
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • The Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Mal-D96N Mice Provide New Insights into Functionality of Mal in TLR Immune Responses
  • The Kinesin Light Chain–Related Protein PAT1 Promotes Superoxide Anion Production in Human Phagocytes
  • IL-17A Recruits Rab35 to IL-17R to Mediate PKCα-Dependent Stress Fiber Formation and Airway Smooth Muscle Contractility
Show more INNATE IMMUNITY AND INFLAMMATION

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Public Access
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2019 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606