Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Cutting Edge: Evidence for a Dynamically Driven T Cell Signaling Mechanism

William F. Hawse, Matthew M. Champion, Michelle V. Joyce, Lance M. Hellman, Moushumi Hossain, Veronica Ryan, Brian G. Pierce, Zhiping Weng and Brian M. Baker
J Immunol June 15, 2012, 188 (12) 5819-5823; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1200952
William F. Hawse
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew M. Champion
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michelle V. Joyce
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lance M. Hellman
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556;Harper Cancer Research Institute, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Moushumi Hossain
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Veronica Ryan
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian G. Pierce
Program in Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhiping Weng
Program in Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian M. Baker
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556;Harper Cancer Research Institute, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

T cells use the αβ TCR to bind peptides presented by MHC proteins (pMHC) on APCs. Formation of a TCR–pMHC complex initiates T cell signaling via a poorly understood process, potentially involving changes in oligomeric state, altered interactions with CD3 subunits, and mechanical stress. These mechanisms could be facilitated by binding-induced changes in the TCR, but the nature and extent of any such alterations are unclear. Using hydrogen/deuterium exchange, we demonstrate that ligation globally rigidifies the TCR, which via entropic and packing effects will promote associations with neighboring proteins and enhance the stability of existing complexes. TCR regions implicated in lateral associations and signaling are particularly affected. Computational modeling demonstrated a high degree of dynamic coupling between the TCR constant and variable domains that is dampened upon ligation. These results raise the possibility that TCR triggering could involve a dynamically driven, allosteric mechanism.

T cells use the αβ TCR to bind antigenic peptides presented by MHC proteins (pMHC) and initiate T cell signaling. Multiple mechanisms have been proposed to explain how TCR ligation triggers signaling, including TCR oligomerization, binding-induced conformational changes, and mechanical stress (1). Each of these mechanisms, alone or in combination, has been purported to alter the relationship between the TCR and its associated CD3 dimers and initiate signaling. Although results from solution measurements have been varied (2), there is evidence that ligand binding does lead to TCR oligomerization on T cell membranes, contributing to the development of higher-order supramolecular complexes (3). Likewise, although large changes in TCR conformation outside of the Ag binding site have not been observed to occur upon pMHC binding, small conformational shifts have been seen in the constant domains (4). Lastly, mechanical forces augment T cell signaling in a manner that is dependent upon the association of the CD3 subunits with the TCR (5).

In general, oligomerization, stronger associations with neighboring subunits, and conformational changes can all be facilitated by changes in molecular flexibility. Global reductions in protein flexibility can help overcome the entropy barrier associated with binding and enhance complementarity at interfaces (6). More defined conformational changes that occur upon binding often take place at regions with heightened intrinsic flexibility (7). Importantly, recent work in a number of systems has demonstrated how ligand binding can alter protein flexibility across time and length scales, affecting binding behavior at distant sites in the absence of crystallographically observed structural changes (8–10). This process, termed dynamically driven allostery, has attracted attention as a unifying mechanism for the general phenomenon of allostery and is of particular interest in cases where signaling occurs in the absence of clear structural changes (reviewed in Ref. 11).

As large conformational changes that could communicate pMHC binding have not been observed in the TCR, we wished to explore the potential for alterations in protein flexibility as a mechanism to communicate receptor engagement. In multiple systems and by both experiment and computation, we found that TCR ligation results in a global reduction in protein flexibility, extending from the variable into the constant domains. Regions in the TCR constant domains implicated in signaling and lateral associations on the T cell membrane were particularly affected. Altogether, our results raise the possibility that dynamically driven allostery could play a role in T cell signaling.

Materials and Methods

Protein expression and purification

Recombinant A6, DMF5, and HLA-A2 were refolded from inclusion bodies and purified as described previously (12). Constructs were stabilized either with an engineered disulfide bond (13) or a C-terminal leucine zipper (14). Synthetic peptide was purchased from Genscript.

Hydrogen/deuterium exchange

Exchange was initiated by diluting samples at 25°C in 25 mM HEPES, 50 mM NaCl, pH 7.4, 10-fold with the same buffer made with 99.9% 2H2O. For analysis of free A6, DMF5, and Tax/HLA-A2, protein concentration after dilution was 10 μM. For analysis of bound A6, concentrations after dilution were 10 μM TCR, 40 μM pMHC, resulting in 94% occupancy. These concentrations were reversed for analysis of bound Tax/HLA-A2. For examination of high affinity DMF5, concentrations after dilution were 20 μM TCR and 80 μM pMHC, resulting in 100% occupancy. For A6 with noncognate MART-126–35/HLA-A2, concentrations after dilution were 10 μM TCR and 45 μM pMHC.

After dilution into 2H2O, 5-μl aliquots were removed at time points ranging from 5 s to 10 h. For each aliquot, exchange was quenched at 0°C with 100 μl 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid at pH 2.4, conditions under which the rate of hydrogen/deuterium exchange is minimal (15). Pepsin (8 μl at 1 mg/ml) was added and digestion performed for 5 min before freezing in liquid nitrogen. Samples were stored at −80°C until analysis.

Identification of peptic fragments of TCR and HLA-A2

Peptic fragments were identified by LC/MS/MS. Five hundred nanograms of the pepsin digest was loaded onto a 75 μm × 15 cm C12 column. Peptides were eluted using an Eksigent Nano UltraLC into the nanospray source of an AB Sciex 5500 QTrap spectrometer. An individual survey scan was performed, and up to six dependent MS/MS acquisitions were collected every cycle. Data were searched using the Paragon algorithm in thorough search mode with no enzyme specificity (16). The sequences of the TCR, HLA-A2, β2-microglobulin (β2m), and potential contaminants (keratins, pepsin, and the Escherichia coli genome) were searched. False detection rates were determined using a decoy-database strategy (17). In all cases, the relevant proteins were the top hit and all peptides passed on for further analysis identified at a 99% confidence interval. An example LC/MS/MS spectrum is shown in Supplemental Fig. 1.

MALDI mass spectrometry

A matrix solution of 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid in 50:50 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (pH 2.4) and acetonitrile was prepared and mixed 1:1 with the acidified protein on a chilled MALDI target. The target was dried under vacuum to minimize back exchange; experiments in which fully deuterated fragments were processed the same way indicated back exchange never exceeded 5%. Spectra were acquired on a Bruker Autoflex III Smartbeam MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer. The instrument was calibrated with a standard peptide mixture prior to collection of each data set.

MALDI data processing

The centroid (mass weighted average) of the isotopic envelope for each peptide was calculated via a spreadsheet after data export. The level of backbone deuterium incorporation for each peptide was calculated as:Embedded Imagewhere ‹m› is the centroid mass, m0% is the mass of the undeuterated sample, and m100% is the mass of the peptide in which the backbone is fully deuterated. In all cases examined, exchange was complete by 10 min as shown in Fig. 1B and Supplemental Fig. 1; thus, percent deuteration at 10 min was used for comparisons.

Surface plasmon resonance

Surface plasmon resonance experiments with the wild-type and high-affinity variant of DMF5 were performed using a steady-state assay with a Biacore 3000 instrument as previously described (12). Solution conditions were 10 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 3 mM EDTA, 0.005% surfactant P-20, pH 7.4, 25°C.

Anisotropic network model calculations

Anisotropic network model (ANM) calculations were performed using the ANM server with a cutoff for interactions between α carbon atoms of 15 Å and a distance weight for interactions between α carbon atoms of 2.5 (18). Calculations were performed on the separately solved structures of A6 and its complex with pMHC (14, 19).

Structure-based computational design of a high-affinity DMF5 variant

Design of the high-affinity DMF5 variant was performed using the ZAFFI algorithm (20) and the structure of wild-type DMF5 in complex with the decameric MART-1 epitope (21). Briefly, mutations were simulated with the interface protocol of Rosetta 2.3 (22), using gradient-based minimization to refine backbone and torsion angles and rigid-body position before and after mutation (this was superior for reproducing binding affinities compared with the fixed backbone protocol used originally). From this analysis, the threshold of the ZAFFI filter function was raised to 0.3. Computational mutagenesis of 31 DMF5 residues resulted in 589 mutants. Ten of the highest scoring mutants were evaluated experimentally, and two that led to enhanced binding (αD26Y, βL98W) combined to generate the high-affinity variant.

Results and Discussion

Ligation by pMHC globally rigidifies the A6 TCR

Although NMR remains the most powerful method for investigating protein motions, complications resulting from the size, complexity, and stability of TCRs and their complexes have limited NMR studies of TCR–pMHC interactions, requiring the use of simplified systems (23). To circumvent these challenges, we used hydrogen/deuterium exchange monitored by proteolysis and mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) as a tool to probe flexibility (reviewed in Ref. 24). In HDX-MS, protein prepared in aqueous solution is incubated in 2H2O, digested into fragments, and backbone deuteron incorporation for each fragment determined via mass spectrometry. Increased levels of deuteron incorporation indicate that backbone amides become more accessible to exchange through greater sampling of more open, solvent-exposed states, whereas lower levels of incorporation indicate that amides are protected from exchange through less frequent excursions into solvent-exposed states. HDX-MS has been used in a number of cases to explore protein motions and their changes and has been particularly useful in characterizing low-frequency motions in samples not easily adaptable to NMR (24).

We began by performing HDX-MS on the ectodomain of the well-characterized A6 TCR in the absence and presence of its cognate pMHC ligand, the Tax peptide presented by the class I MHC HLA-A*0201 (HLA-A2). The A6 TCR is particularly amenable to this analysis, as its high affinity toward Tax/HLA-A2 allows full receptor occupancy to be achieved without requiring concentrations of pMHC that would hinder detection of TCR signals in the analysis of the exchange reactions (12). As shown in Fig. 1A, the A6 TCR showed decreased levels of deuteration upon ligation. Data for each peptide fragment were collected as a function of time out to several hours, but in all cases examined, exchange was essentially complete within 10 min as shown in Fig. 1B and Supplemental Fig. 1. The average deuteration of the free TCR after 10 min of exchange was 35%, whereas in the complex the average deuteration after 10 min of exchange was 18% (Fig. 1C). These values were reproducible, with a repeat experiment yielding free and bound levels of 34% and 16%, respectively. As shown in Fig. 1C, the reduced deuteration was distributed across the TCR, indicating that TCR ligation results in a global reduction in structural fluctuations, extending from the variable to the constant domains, although the extent varies throughout the molecule. Similar global reductions in flexibility upon ligand binding have been seen in other protein systems, such as the allosterically modulated DNA binding protein BirA (25).

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Hydrogen/deuterium exchange reveals that the A6 TCR undergoes a global reduction in flexibility upon pMHC binding. (A) MALDI-TOF mass spectra for the fragment of the FG loop (sequence 225WTQDRAKPVTQ235) of A6 free (blue) and bound to Tax/HLA-A2 (red) 10 min after initiation of hydrogen/deuterium exchange. (B) Time courses for the exchange reaction of the FG loop fragment in (A) demonstrates that in both free and bound A6, exchange follows simple kinetics and is complete within 10 min. (C) Percent deuteration of each fragment of free and ligand-bound A6 at the 10-min time point. Fragments including the CDR and the AB, DE, and FG loops in the constant domains are indicated. The dashed blue and red lines indicate the average deuteration of the free and bound protein, respectively.

As expected, peptide fragments covering the A6 CDR loops showed reduced deuteration. Beyond the CDR loops, reduced deuteration was also seen for other key regions of the TCR, including a more than 3-fold reduction in deuteration for a fragment spanning the β-chain FG loop, a prominent structural feature that forms part of a cavity that has been proposed as a docking site for CD3εγ (26). A molecular dynamics simulation has shown that the CD3εδ subunit also rigidifies upon binding (in this case an mAb) (27). It is not known if CD3εγ likewise rigidifies upon ligand binding; however, stronger binding of one or both of the CD3ε subunits to the TCR resulting from pMHC-induced rigidification could play a role in T cell triggering.

Although the FG loop is the most prominent feature affected in the TCR constant domains, the reduction in flexibility includes other elements also implicated in either TCR oligomerization or interactions with CD3 subunits (3, 28). This includes the α-chain AB loop, which has been suggested to play a role in mediating interactions between adjacent TCRs on T cell membranes. Reduced AB loop flexibility could underlie a prior observation of a conformational change occurring upon TCR ligation (4), which is observed to a small extent when comparing the bound and free structures of A6 (19).

The ectodomain of the A6 TCR used for the data in Fig. 1 included an engineered disulfide bond near the base of the TCR constant domains to ensure heterodimer stability and facilitate proper chain pairing during protein refolding (13). An experiment with an alternate construct stabilized instead by a C-terminal heterodimeric coiled coil (14) also showed reduced deuteration upon binding at regions distant from the Ag binding site (Supplemental Fig. 1), indicating that the results in Fig. 1 are not a consequence of the method used to stabilize the receptor. A control experiment in which HDX-MS was performed with A6 before and after mixing with noncognate ligand did not show reduced deuteration (Supplemental Fig. 1).

Ligation by pMHC globally rigidifies the DMF5 TCR

To ask if the reduction in exchange occurring upon binding was general or specific to A6, we repeated the HDX-MS experiments using the DMF5 TCR, which recognizes the MART-126–35 peptide presented by HLA-A2 (21). However, DMF5 binds more weakly than A6, and achieving high receptor occupancy required excess ligand concentrations that negatively affected detection of TCR signals by MALDI mass spectrometry. We thus used a high-affinity DMF5 variant, produced using the recently developed structure-guided TCR design algorithm ZAFFI (20). Surface plasmon resonance analysis of 10 DMF5 point mutants predicted to improve affinity identified two that when combined yielded a variant that bound with an affinity of 43 nM, more than 250-fold tighter than wild-type (Fig. 2A).

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

The DMF5 TCR also undergoes a global reduction in flexibility upon pMHC binding. (A) Steady-state surface plasmon resonance experiment showing the affinities of the native (left) and high-affinity (right) variant of DMF5 for the MART-126–35/HLA-A2 ligand. The high-affinity variant shows a >250-fold enhancement in binding affinity. (B) Percent deuteration of fragments of free and ligand-bound high-affinity DMF5 variant at the 10-min time point. Fragments including the CDR, AB, CC′, and FG loops and the C and F strands are indicated. The dashed blue and red lines indicate the average deuteration of the free and bound protein, respectively.

HDX-MS experiments with the high-affinity DMF5 variant showed a reduction in hydrogen/deuterium exchange upon ligation that closely resembled that observed with A6 (Fig. 2B, Supplemental Fig. 1). The average deuteration of DMF5 before and after binding was 37% and 19%, respectively, with a repeat experiment yielding values of 35% and 18%. As with A6, the reduction was distributed across the TCR and included the FG loop and the AB loop, as well as other regions implicated in TCR oligomerization or association with CD3 subunits (3, 28). The reduction in exchange behavior for both DMF5 and A6 mapped to the structures of the TCRs is shown in Fig. 3.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Percent change in deuteration upon binding of each A6 and DMF5 fragment mapped to the TCR structure. The distributed reduction in exchange behavior stemming from the Ag binding site to the constant domains is clearly visible. As indicated by the scale, warmer colors indicate a large change, and cooler colors indicate a smaller change. Fragments colored gray were not resolved in the experiments.

Highly correlated internal dynamics of the TCR are dampened upon ligation

To investigate changes in TCR dynamics upon pMHC binding further, we performed ANM dynamics simulations, which report on low-frequency protein motions captured by HDX-MS (reviewed in Ref. 29). In ANM simulations, slow motions inaccessible to traditional molecular dynamics simulations are sampled by modeling protein structures as connected nodes whose motions are regulated by empirically determined force constants. ANM simulations have been used to study the dynamics of complex systems as large as ribosomes and have been particularly useful in exploring how ligand-induced changes in flexibility can give rise to allosteric effects. Several comparisons have shown good agreement between ANM data and experimental assessments of low-frequency protein motions, including data from hydrogen/deuterium exchange and NMR (29).

ANM simulations of the free and complexed A6 TCR reproduced the general features of the HDX-MS analysis, showing the global dampening of dynamics associated with ligand binding (Fig. 4A). The motions of the binding loops were extensively affected, as were those of the FG loop and other elements of the constant domains. We next performed a cross-correlation analysis of the data to examine the dynamic coupling between regions of the TCR. In its free state, a high degree of local, fragment-level correlated motion was observed throughout the TCR, including both within and across the Vα, Vβ, Cα, and Cβ domains (Fig. 4B). These correlated local motions were significantly reduced in the ligated state. Rather than correlated motion occurring between individual elements such as the CDR and constant domains loops, in the bound state the domains themselves moved in correlated, en bloc motions (Fig. 4C). This switch from fragment-level correlated to domain-level correlated motion suggests the TCR is mechanically optimized to respond dynamically to pMHC ligation. The interconnected nature of the Ig fold could underlie this behavior. Interdomain dynamics and their reduction upon binding could be communicated through the domain linkers, which in other modular proteins have been shown to be key elements in propagating signals from one domain to another (30). Another contributor could be the inherent flexibility in the relative positioning of the TCR variable domains (31), the reduction of which upon binding could impact the motions within and between the constant domains.

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

ANM simulations indicate the TCR possesses a high degree of correlated internal motion that is reduced upon ligand binding. (A) Fluctuations in the first normal mode plotted for the A6 TCR α-chain (left) and β-chain (right). Consistent with the HDX-MS experiments, the simulations show a global dampening of TCR motions. The positions of the CDR, FG, and AB loops are indicated. (B) Correlation analysis for the first normal mode of the free TCR reveals a high degree of correlated motion within and across the Vα, Vβ, Cα, and Cβ domains. As indicated in the scale at the bottom, green indicates no correlation, blue indicates full negative correlation (in-phase motion in which two groups move toward and away from each other), and red indicates full positive correlation (in-phase motion in which two groups move in the same direction). (C) Ligand binding results in a substantial reduction in the correlated motion of individual fragments, with correlated motion instead occurring between individual domains. The scale is the same as in (B).

TCR ligation also rigidifies the HLA-A2 H chain and β2m

To determine if TCR ligation alters the dynamics of the MHC, we performed HDX-MS on Tax/HLA-A2. TCR ligation resulted in an overall reduction in deuteration of the HLA-A2 H chain from 27 to 16% (Supplemental Fig. 2, with supporting mass spectrometry data in Supplemental Fig. 1). As expected, the α1 and α2 helices had decreased incorporation of deuterons when ligated to the TCR. However, distant regions (including sites that contact the CD8 coreceptor) also had lower levels of deuteration, indicating that, similar to the TCR, the MHC also rigidifies upon binding. β2m also rigidified, showing a reduction in deuteration from 24 to 18%. The latter observation confirms that binding-induced changes in flexibility can be communicated across interfaces in noncovalently associated complexes. Further, the distributed reduction in pMHC flexibility could underlie recent observations of cooperative CD8 binding to a TCR–pMHC complex, with a concomitant positive impact on T cell signaling (32).

In conclusion, we demonstrate that formation of a TCR–pMHC complex results in global TCR rigidification. Via entropic and packing effects, rigidification will promote associations with other neighboring proteins and strengthen the stability of existing complexes. New or strengthened assemblages could impact the density, positions, and accessibility of cytoplasmic domains and their associated kinases, as well as prime a complex to communicate a mechanical stress. Overall, our data raise the possibility that the TCR and its pMHC ligand are components of a dynamically modulated, allosteric T cell signaling system.

Disclosures

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by Grants GM067079, GM084884, and RR025761 from the National Institutes of Health, the Walther Cancer Research Foundation, and Grant PF-11-143-01 from the American Cancer Society.

  • The online version of this article contains supplemental material.

  • Abbreviations used in this article:

    ANM
    anisotropic network model
    HDX-MS
    hydrogen/deuterium exchange monitored by proteolysis and mass spectrometry
    β2m
    β2-microglobulin
    pMHC
    peptide/MHC complex.

  • Received March 30, 2012.
  • Accepted April 17, 2012.
  • Copyright © 2012 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

References

  1. ↵
    1. van der Merwe P. A.,
    2. O. Dushek
    . 2011. Mechanisms for T cell receptor triggering. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 11: 47–55.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Deng L.,
    2. R. J. Langley,
    3. P. H. Brown,
    4. G. Xu,
    5. L. Teng,
    6. Q. Wang,
    7. M. I. Gonzales,
    8. G. G. Callender,
    9. M. I. Nishimura,
    10. S. L. Topalian,
    11. R. A. Mariuzza
    . 2007. Structural basis for the recognition of mutant self by a tumor-specific, MHC class II-restricted T cell receptor. Nat. Immunol. 8: 398–408.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Kuhns M. S.,
    2. A. T. Girvin,
    3. L. O. Klein,
    4. R. Chen,
    5. K. D. C. Jensen,
    6. E. W. Newell,
    7. J. B. Huppa,
    8. B. F. Lillemeier,
    9. M. Huse,
    10. Y. H. Chien,
    11. et al
    . 2010. Evidence for a functional sidedness to the alphabetaTCR. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107: 5094–5099.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Beddoe T.,
    2. Z. Chen,
    3. C. S. Clements,
    4. L. K. Ely,
    5. S. R. Bushell,
    6. J. P. Vivian,
    7. L. Kjer-Nielsen,
    8. S. S. Pang,
    9. M. A. Dunstone,
    10. Y. C. Liu,
    11. et al
    . 2009. Antigen ligation triggers a conformational change within the constant domain of the alphabeta T cell receptor. Immunity 30: 777–788.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Kim S. T.,
    2. K. Takeuchi,
    3. Z.-Y. J. Sun,
    4. M. Touma,
    5. C. E. Castro,
    6. A. Fahmy,
    7. M. J. Lang,
    8. G. Wagner,
    9. E. L. Reinherz
    . 2009. The alphabeta T cell receptor is an anisotropic mechanosensor. J. Biol. Chem. 284: 31028–31037.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Frederick K. K.,
    2. M. S. Marlow,
    3. K. G. Valentine,
    4. A. J. Wand
    . 2007. Conformational entropy in molecular recognition by proteins. Nature 448: 325–329.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Tobi D.,
    2. I. Bahar
    . 2005. Structural changes involved in protein binding correlate with intrinsic motions of proteins in the unbound state. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 18908–18913.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Zhang J.,
    2. M. J. Chalmers,
    3. K. R. Stayrook,
    4. L. L. Burris,
    5. Y. Wang,
    6. S. A. Busby,
    7. B. D. Pascal,
    8. R. D. Garcia-Ordonez,
    9. J. B. Bruning,
    10. M. A. Istrate,
    11. et al
    . 2011. DNA binding alters coactivator interaction surfaces of the intact VDR-RXR complex. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18: 556–563.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Popovych N.,
    2. S. Sun,
    3. R. H. Ebright,
    4. C. G. Kalodimos
    . 2006. Dynamically driven protein allostery. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13: 831–838.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Tzeng S.-R.,
    2. C. G. Kalodimos
    . 2009. Dynamic activation of an allosteric regulatory protein. Nature 462: 368–372.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Smock R. G.,
    2. L. M. Gierasch
    . 2009. Sending signals dynamically. Science 324: 198–203.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Davis-Harrison R. L.,
    2. K. M. Armstrong,
    3. B. M. Baker
    . 2005. Two different T cell receptors use different thermodynamic strategies to recognize the same peptide/MHC ligand. J. Mol. Biol. 346: 533–550.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Boulter J. M.,
    2. M. Glick,
    3. P. T. Todorov,
    4. E. Baston,
    5. M. Sami,
    6. P. Rizkallah,
    7. B. K. Jakobsen
    . 2003. Stable, soluble T-cell receptor molecules for crystallization and therapeutics. Protein Eng. 16: 707–711.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Ding Y. H.,
    2. B. M. Baker,
    3. D. N. Garboczi,
    4. W. E. Biddison,
    5. D. C. Wiley
    . 1999. Four A6-TCR/peptide/HLA-A2 structures that generate very different T cell signals are nearly identical. Immunity 11: 45–56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Englander S. W.,
    2. T. R. Sosnick,
    3. J. J. Englander,
    4. L. Mayne
    . 1996. Mechanisms and uses of hydrogen exchange. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 6: 18–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Shilov I. V.,
    2. S. L. Seymour,
    3. A. A. Patel,
    4. A. Loboda,
    5. W. H. Tang,
    6. S. P. Keating,
    7. C. L. Hunter,
    8. L. M. Nuwaysir,
    9. D. A. Schaeffer
    . 2007. The Paragon Algorithm, a next generation search engine that uses sequence temperature values and feature probabilities to identify peptides from tandem mass spectra. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 6: 1638–1655.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Balgley B. M.,
    2. T. Laudeman,
    3. L. Yang,
    4. T. Song,
    5. C. S. Lee
    . 2007. Comparative evaluation of tandem MS search algorithms using a target-decoy search strategy. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 6: 1599–1608.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Eyal E.,
    2. L.-W. Yang,
    3. I. Bahar
    . 2006. Anisotropic network model: systematic evaluation and a new web interface. Bioinformatics 22: 2619–2627.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Scott D. R.,
    2. O. Y. Borbulevych,
    3. K. H. Piepenbrink,
    4. S. A. Corcelli,
    5. B. M. Baker
    . 2011. Disparate degrees of hypervariable loop flexibility control T-cell receptor cross-reactivity, specificity, and binding mechanism. J. Mol. Biol. 414: 385–400.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Haidar J. N.,
    2. B. Pierce,
    3. Y. Yu,
    4. W. Tong,
    5. M. Li,
    6. Z. Weng
    . 2009. Structure-based design of a T-cell receptor leads to nearly 100-fold improvement in binding affinity for pepMHC. Proteins 74: 948–960.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Borbulevych O. Y.,
    2. S. M. Santhanagopolan,
    3. M. Hossain,
    4. B. M. Baker
    . 2011. TCRs used in cancer gene therapy cross-react with MART-1/Melan-A tumor antigens via distinct mechanisms. J. Immunol. 187: 2453–2463.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Kortemme T.,
    2. D. Baker
    . 2002. A simple physical model for binding energy hot spots in protein-protein complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 14116–14121.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Varani L.,
    2. A. J. Bankovich,
    3. C. W. Liu,
    4. L. A. Colf,
    5. L. L. Jones,
    6. D. M. Kranz,
    7. J. D. Puglisi,
    8. K. C. Garcia
    . 2007. Solution mapping of T cell receptor docking footprints on peptide-MHC. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104: 13080–13085.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Marcsisin S. R.,
    2. J. R. Engen
    . 2010. Hydrogen exchange mass spectrometry: what is it and what can it tell us? Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 397: 967–972.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Laine O.,
    2. E. D. Streaker,
    3. M. Nabavi,
    4. C. C. Fenselau,
    5. D. Beckett
    . 2008. Allosteric signaling in the biotin repressor occurs via local folding coupled to global dampening of protein dynamics. J. Mol. Biol. 381: 89–101.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Kim S. T.,
    2. M. Touma,
    3. K. Takeuchi,
    4. Z.-Y. J. Sun,
    5. V. P. Dave,
    6. D. J. Kappes,
    7. G. Wagner,
    8. E. L. Reinherz
    . 2010. Distinctive CD3 heterodimeric ectodomain topologies maximize antigen-triggered activation of α β T cell receptors. J. Immunol. 185: 2951–2959.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Martínez-Martín N.,
    2. R. M. Risueño,
    3. A. Morreale,
    4. I. Zaldívar,
    5. E. Fernández-Arenas,
    6. F. Herranz,
    7. A. R. Ortiz,
    8. B. Alarcón
    . 2009. Cooperativity between T cell receptor complexes revealed by conformational mutants of CD3epsilon. Sci. Signal. 2: ra43.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Kuhns M. S.,
    2. M. M. Davis
    . 2007. Disruption of extracellular interactions impairs T cell receptor-CD3 complex stability and signaling. Immunity 26: 357–369.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Bahar I.,
    2. T. R. Lezon,
    3. L.-W. Yang,
    4. E. Eyal
    . 2010. Global dynamics of proteins: bridging between structure and function. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 39: 23–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Ma B.,
    2. C.-J. Tsai,
    3. T. Haliloğlu,
    4. R. Nussinov
    . 2011. Dynamic allostery: linkers are not merely flexible. Structure 19: 907–917.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Gagnon S. J.,
    2. O. Y. Borbulevych,
    3. R. L. Davis-Harrison,
    4. R. V. Turner,
    5. M. Damirjian,
    6. A. Wojnarowicz,
    7. W. E. Biddison,
    8. B. M. Baker
    . 2006. T cell receptor recognition via cooperative conformational plasticity. J. Mol. Biol. 363: 228–243.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Jiang N.,
    2. J. Huang,
    3. L. J. Edwards,
    4. B. Liu,
    5. Y. Zhang,
    6. C. D. Beal,
    7. B. D. Evavold,
    8. C. Zhu
    . 2011. Two-stage cooperative T cell receptor-peptide major histocompatibility complex-CD8 trimolecular interactions amplify antigen discrimination. Immunity 34: 13–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 188 (12)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 188, Issue 12
15 Jun 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cutting Edge: Evidence for a Dynamically Driven T Cell Signaling Mechanism
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
Citation Tools
Cutting Edge: Evidence for a Dynamically Driven T Cell Signaling Mechanism
William F. Hawse, Matthew M. Champion, Michelle V. Joyce, Lance M. Hellman, Moushumi Hossain, Veronica Ryan, Brian G. Pierce, Zhiping Weng, Brian M. Baker
The Journal of Immunology June 15, 2012, 188 (12) 5819-5823; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1200952

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Cutting Edge: Evidence for a Dynamically Driven T Cell Signaling Mechanism
William F. Hawse, Matthew M. Champion, Michelle V. Joyce, Lance M. Hellman, Moushumi Hossain, Veronica Ryan, Brian G. Pierce, Zhiping Weng, Brian M. Baker
The Journal of Immunology June 15, 2012, 188 (12) 5819-5823; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1200952
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results and Discussion
    • Disclosures
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Cutting Edge: G Protein Subunit β 1 Negatively Regulates NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation
  • Cutting Edge: IL-17B Uses IL-17RA and IL-17RB to Induce Type 2 Inflammation from Human Lymphocytes
  • Cutting Edge: Core Binding Factor β Is Required for Group 2 Innate Lymphoid Cell Activation
Show more CUTTING EDGE

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Public Access
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2019 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606