Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) are a heterogeneous group of cells that play a critical role in tumor associated immune suppression. In an attempt to identify a specific subset of MDSC primarily responsible for immunosuppressive features of these cells, 10 different tumor models were investigated. All models showed variable but significant increase in the population of MDSC. Variability of MDSC expansion in vivo matched closely the effect of tumor cell condition medium in vitro. MDSC consists of two major subsets of Ly6G+Ly6Clow granulocytic and Ly6G−Ly6Chigh monocytic cells. Granulocytic MDSC have increased level of reactive oxygen species and undetectable level of NO whereas monocytic MDSC had increased level of NO but undetectable levels of reactive oxygen species. However, their suppressive activity per cell basis was comparable. Almost all tumor models demonstrated a preferential expansion of granulocytic subset of MDSC. We performed a phenotypical and functional analysis of several surface molecules previously suggested to be involved in MDSC-mediated suppression of T cells: CD115, CD124, CD80, PD-L1, and PD-L2. Although substantial proportion of MDSC expressed those molecules no differences in the level of their expression or the proportion, positive cells were found between MDSC and cells from tumor-free mice that lack immune suppressive activity. The level of MDSC-mediated T cell suppression did not depend on the expression of these molecules. These data indicate that suppressive features of MDSC is caused not by expansion of a specific subset but more likely represent a functional state of these cells.
The myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC)4 are a group of myeloid cells comprised of precursors of macrophages, granulocytes, dendritic cells and myeloid cells at earlier stages of differentiation (reviewed in Refs. 1, 2, 3, 4). In mice these cells are broadly defined as Gr-1+CD11b+ cells. They have a very rapid turnover and accumulate in large numbers in lymphoid tissues of tumor-bearing mice as well as in mice with infectious diseases, sepsis, and trauma (5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10). MDSC have also been described in cancer patients (11, 12, 13, 14, 15). In a recent study circulating MDSC were found to be significantly increased in cancer patients of all stages relative to healthy volunteers. A significant correlation between circulating MDSC and clinical cancer stage was also observed. Among stage IV patients, those with extensive metastatic tumor burden had the highest percentage and absolute number of MDSC (16). The main feature of these cells is their ability to suppress T cell responses in Ag-specific or nonspecific manners depending on the condition of T cell activation (2, 4). These cells are now considered as one of the major factors responsible for tumor associated immune defects and are an attractive target for therapeutic intervention. In naive tumor-free mice, Gr-1+CD11b+ immature myeloid cells (IMC) are present in bone marrow and in small numbers in the spleen. IMC contain precursors of mature myeloid cells and quickly differentiate in vitro or after adoptive transfer in vivo (17). Importantly in contrast to MDSC, these cells lack immunosuppressive activity (18, 19, 20, 21).
The heterogeneous nature of these cells prompted a search for more narrowly defined specific populations that are primarily responsible for the observed effect of MDSC. Identification of such population would help not only better understand the biology of tumor-induced immune suppression, but also would provide better targets for therapeutic intervention. A number of different surface molecules (CD80, M-CSF receptor, IL-4Rα, PD-L1, PD-L2, B7-H4) were suggested to define different immune suppressive myeloid cells (22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27). However, their specificity for MDSC remains unknown. It is not clear whether there is an expansion of specific subsets within the population of MDSC as compared with their normal nonimmunosuppressive counterpart IMC. Such an expansion would be a first sign of specific role of individual subgroup of MDSC in cancer. It is not clear whether individual subsets are different in their ability to inhibit T cell responses. Most of the studies of MDSC were restricted to one or two tumor models and conflicting results are often reported regarding phenotype of these cells. This raises a question about the tumor specificity of the observations. In this study we tried to address those questions by evaluating side by side in vivo and in vitro 10 different models of lung, breast, colon cancer, melanoma, and sarcoma developed in three different strains of mice. We performed a phenotypic and functional analysis of different subsets of MDSC with the goal to identify a subset of MDSC directly responsible for immune suppression attributed to these cells.
Materials and Methods
Mice, reagents, and tumor models
Female BALB/c, C57BL/6, and FVB/N mice at 6 to 8 wk of age were obtained from the National Cancer Institute (Frederick, MD). Mice were kept in pathogen-free conditions and handled in accordance with the requirements of the Guideline for Animal Experiments. The following s.c. tumor models were used: C57BL/6 mice, EL-4 thymoma (obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC)), Lewis Lung Carcinoma (LLC), B16F10 melanoma provided by E. Celis (H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL), MC38 colon carcinoma provided by I. Turkova (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA), and C3 sarcoma provided by W. Kast (University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA); BALB/c mice, DA3 mammary carcinoma provided by D. Lopez (University of Miami, Miami, FL), 4T1 mammary carcinoma provided by S. Ostrand-Rosenberg (University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD), CT26 colon carcinoma (ATCC), and MethA sarcoma provided by L. J. Old (Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, New York, NY); and FVB/N mice, ANV mammary carcinoma provided by K. Knutson (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN). The number of tumor cells injected was different for each model and was selected based on the ability to form tumor with 1.5 cm in diameter within 2–3 wk of injection. To generate tumor cell conditioned medium (TCCM), subconfluent cells were kept in RPMI 1640 medium with a reduced (3%) serum concentration for 48 h. After that time, supernatants were collected, aliquoted and kept at −80°C until further use.
b, anti-I-Ad, anti-H2-Kb, anti-H2-Kd, anti-CD80, anti-CD86, anti-CD124 (IL-4Rα), and isotype control Abs were obtained from BD Pharmingen; anti-PD-L1, anti-PD-L2, and anti-CD115 Abs were purchased from eBioscience. Neutralizing anti-PD-L1 Ab was provided by Dr. L. Chen (John Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD). OVA-derived (H-2Kb, SIINFEKL) and control (H-2Kb, RAHYNIVTF) peptides were obtained from QCB.
Spleens were harvested under sterile conditions. Single-cell suspensions were prepared, and red cells were removed using ACK lysing buffer. Two million splenocytes were incubated for 30 min on ice in staining medium (1% FBS in PBS) with the relevant Abs and then washed with PBS. For intracellular staining of nitrotyrosine, cells were labeled with anti-CD11b-allophycocyanin, anti-Ly6C-FITC, and anti-Ly6G-PE, fixed, permeabilized with Cytofix/Cytoperm buffer (BD Biosciences), and washed with a 1X Perm/Wash solution (BD Biosciences). The cells were incubated with rabbit polyclonal anti-nitrotyrosine Ab for 1 h on ice. After washing, the cells were incubated with the secondary detection reagents, goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) Alexa Fluor 647 for 45 min on ice. After washing, the samples were analyzed using a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and were analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star).
Generation of cells from bone marrow progenitors
Bone marrow cells were obtained from the femurs and tibias. One million bone marrow cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS, 10 ng/ml GM-CSF, 10 ng/ml IL-4, and 50 μM 2-ME, alone or in the presence of 30% v/v control (from 3T3 fibroblasts) or TCCM. The cultures were maintained at 37°C in 5% CO2-humidified atmosphere in 24-well plates. On day 3 of culture, floating cells were gently removed, and fresh medium with cytokines and TCCM was replaced. Cells were collected on day 5 and analyzed by flow cytometry.
Isolation of cells and functional assays
MDSC and their subsets were isolated from spleens of tumor-bearing or control mice using cell sorting on FACSAria cell sorter (BD Biosciences). The purity of cell populations was >99%. As responder cells we used total spleen cells from OT-1 mice. CD8+ T cells from these mice have a TCR that recognize OVA-derived peptide SIINFEKL. The number of IFN-γ-producing cells in response to stimulation to the specific or control peptides (10 μg/ml) was evaluated in an ELISPOT assay and performed as described earlier (28). The numbers of spots were counted in triplicates and calculated using an automatic ELISPOT counter (Cellular Technology). Cell proliferation induced by Ag-specific or CD3/CD28 stimulation (0.5/5 μg/ml) was evaluated using [3H]thymidine incorporation as previously described (29). For experiments that examined the effect of NO, arginase, or reactive oxygen species (ROS) inhibitor, l-NMMA (0.5 mM; Calbiochem), nor-NOHA (NW-hydroxyl-nor-l-arginine, 0.5 mM; Calbiochem), or catalase (1000 U/ml; Sigma-Aldrich) were added at the beginning of the culture.
The oxidation-sensitive dye hydroethidine was used for the measurement of ROS production by MDSC. Cells were incubated at room temperature in DMEM in the presence of 1 μM hydroethidine with or without 300 nM PMA for 30 min, washed with PBS, and then labeled with anti-CD11b-allophycocyanin, anti-Ly6C-FITC, and anti-Ly6G-PE. After incubation on ice for 20 min, cells were washed with PBS and analyzed using flow cytometry.
Arginase activity was measured in cell lysates, as previously described (30). Briefly, cells were lysed for 30 min with 100 μl of 0.1% Triton X-100. Subsequently, 100 μl of 25 mM Tris-HCl and 10 μl of 10 mM MnCl2 were added, and the enzyme was activated by heating for 10 min at 56°C. Arginine hydrolysis was conducted by incubating the lysate with 100 μl of 0.5 M l-arginine (pH 9.7) at 37°C for 120 min. The reaction was stopped with 900 μl of H2SO4 (96%)/H3PO4 (85%)/H2O (1/3/7, v/v/v). Urea concentration was measured at 540 nm after addition of 40 μl of α-isonitrosopropiophenone (dissolved in 100% ethanol), followed by heating at 95°C for 30 min.
Equal volumes of culture supernatants (100 μl) were mixed with Greiss reagent (1% sulfanilamide in 5% phosphoric acid and 0.1% N-1-naphthyl-ethylenediamine dihydrochloride in double-distilled water). After a 10-min incubation at room temperature, the absorbance at 550 nm was measured using microplate plate reader (Bio-Rad). Nitrite concentrations were determined by comparing the absorbance values for the test samples to a standard curve generated by serial dilution of 0.25 mM sodium nitrite.
The statistical significance between values was determined by Student’s t test. All data were expressed as the mean ± SD. Probability values of p ≤ 0.05 were considered significant.
The expansion of MDSC in different tumor models
To address the main question of the study 10 different tumor models on three different mouse strains were used. All mice were injected s.c. with a different number of tumor cells to provide for the development of similar size (1.5 cm in diameter) tumors within 3 wk of inoculation. These conditions were selected because they were routinely used in experiments with MDSC-mediated immune suppression. Spleens from naive tumor-free mice contained less than 2.5% of Gr-1+CD11b+ cells (Fig. 1⇓, A and B). The total number of splenocytes was increased in all tumor models from 1.5- to 3-fold (data not shown). A significant increase in the proportion of Gr-1+CD11b+ MDSC in spleens was observed in all 10 tumor models (Fig. 1⇓B). There was variability in MDSC frequency between different tumor models. Some tumor models were associated with a substantial expansion (>15%) of MDSC (EL-4, DA3, 4T1, and CT26), some had limited (<5%) expansion (MC38, C3, ANV) and some had intermediate (10–15%) level of MDSC (LLC, B16, MethA) (Fig. 1⇓B). We asked whether this variability was mediated by tumor-derived factors or was attributed to specific mouse strains. Bone marrow cells from naive C57BL/6 or BALB/c mice were cultured for 5 days with GM-CSF and IL-4 in the presence of conditioned medium from control 3T3 fibroblasts or different tumor cell lines. The proportion of Gr-1+CD11b+ cells was evaluated after 5 days. There was a high level of concordance between the effect of TCCM on MDSC production in vitro and the frequency of MDSC in tumor-bearing mice. TCCM from the LLC, C3, and MethA sarcoma cell lines produced very little change in the frequency of MDSC in vitro (Fig. 1⇓C). These three models were characterized by a relatively small expansion of MDSC in vivo (Fig. 1⇓B). In contrast, TCCM from EL-4, B16, and CT26 induced a significantly higher generation of Gr-1+CD11b+ cells in vitro (Fig. 1⇓C). These three models also showed a high proportion of MDSC in spleens (Fig. 1⇓B).
MDSC subsets are differentially regulated in tumor-bearing mice
Myeloid differentiation Ag Gr-1 consists of two epitopes recognized by anti-Ly6G and anti-Ly6C Abs. Accordingly, a population of CD11b+Gr-1+ MDSC consists of two major subsets: cells with granulocytic phenotype that express Ly6G marker and cells with monocytic phenotype expressing Ly6C marker. Recent reports indicated that these two populations might have different functions in infectious and autoimmune diseases and cancer (10, 31, 32, 33). We asked how these populations are changed in spleens of tumor-bearing mice by analyzing the frequency of CD11b+Ly6G+Ly6Clow granulocytic and CD11b+Ly6G−Ly6Chigh monocytic populations (Fig. 2⇓A). In naive mice, the ratio between these two populations was 3:1. In tumor-bearing mice the population of granulocytic CD11b+Ly6G+Ly6Clow MDSC was consistently increased in all tumor models, whereas the frequency of monocytic CD11b+Ly6G−Ly6Chigh MDSC was significantly increased in only few models (EL-4, LLC, and ANV). Moreover, in mice bearing EL-4 or ANV tumors granulocytic population of MDSC was increased substantially more than the monocytic cells. In only one model (LLC) these two populations were increased equally (Fig. 2⇓B). Thus, granulocytic subset of MDSC was a predominant population of MDSC expanded in tumor-bearing mice.
The function of MDSC subsets was evaluated in the model of EL-4 tumor-bearing mice because this model was characterized by an increase in both cell populations. Gr-1+CD11b+, CD11b+Ly6G+Ly6Clow, and CD11b+Ly6G−Ly6Chigh cells were sorted from spleens of tumor-bearing mice (Fig. 2⇑C). These cells were added at different ratios to OT-1 splenocytes in the presence of specific (SIINFEKL) or control peptides and T cell proliferation or IFN-γ production was evaluated. At a 1:3 ratio, all MDSC population significantly suppressed CD8+ T cell proliferation and IFN-γ production, whereas at a 1:12 ratio no suppressive activity was observed (Fig. 2⇑, D and E). Slight trend in increased T cell proliferation could be seen at a 1:12 ratio. However, it did not reach statistical significance. T cell proliferation was similar in the presence of all MDSC populations (Fig. 2⇑D). When the ability of CD8+ T cells to produce IFN-γ was evaluated, granulocytic MDSC demonstrated more profound (although not statistically significant) suppressive activity per cell basis than monocytic or total population of MDSC (Fig. 2⇑E). However, this effect was observed only at the highest MDSC to splenocyte ratio (1:3) and was not seen at lower MDSC concentrations. Neither of MDSC populations was able to inhibit T cell proliferation induced by anti-CD3/CD28 Abs (Fig. 2⇑F). Moreover, slight increase in T cell proliferation, albeit not statistically significant, was observed in the presence of all MDSC subsets tested in these experiments.
To evaluate the possible mechanism of suppressive activity of different MDSC subsets, Gr-1+CD11b+, CD11b+Ly6G+Ly6Clow, and CD11b+Ly6G−Ly6Chigh cells were sorted from spleens of tumor-bearing mice, and the level of arginase activity, NO, and ROS production was evaluated. No statistically significant differences were observed in the level of arginase activity between those cell populations (Fig. 3⇓A). Major differences between cell populations were observed in the ability of cells to produce NO and ROS. In response to stimulation with LPS (Fig. 3⇓B) or in the presence of OT-1 T cells stimulated with specific peptide or anti-CD3/CD28 Ab (Fig. 3⇓, C and D) monocytic CD11b+Ly6G−Ly6Chigh MDSC produced significantly higher level of NO than granulocytic MDSC or the total population of MDSC. In contrast, CD11b+Ly6G+Ly6Clow granulocytic MDSC had significantly higher levels of ROS production than CD11b+Ly6G−Ly6Chigh monocytic MDSC (Fig. 3⇓E). MDSC production of peroxynitrites was previously implicated in a number of studies in MDSC-mediated T cell suppression (34, 35). We asked whether MDSC subsets differed in their ability to produce peroxynitrite (as was evaluated by the level of nitrotyrosine in the cells). Both granulocytic and monocytic subsets of MDSC expressed dramatically (6- to 10-fold) higher levels of nitrotyrosine than CD11b negative cells (Fig. 3⇓F). CD11b+Ly6G−Ly6Chigh monocytic subset of MDSC expressed 2-fold higher level of nitrotyrosine than CD11b+Ly6G+Ly6Clow granulocytic MDSC (Fig. 3⇓F). To investigate whether those differences would affect the ability of MDSC to increase nitrotyrosine level in T cells, OT-1 splenocytes were cultured at a 3:1 ratio with sorted subsets of MDSC in the presence of specific peptide. The proportion of nitrotyrosine-positive cells among CD8+ T cells was evaluated by flow cytometry after 24 h of incubation. Monocytic subset of MDSC induced substantially higher level of nitrotyrosine-positive CD8+ cells than granulocytic subset (Fig. 3⇓G). Consistent with previous observations Gr-1+CD11b+ cells from naive mice did not affect the level of nitrotyrosine in CD8+ T cells (Fig. 3⇓G).
Inhibitor of hydroxylperoxide, catalase completely blocked suppressive activity of granulocytic MDSC subset but had no effect of monocytic MDSC (Fig. 3⇑H). In contrast, combination of inducible NO synthase inhibitor LMMA with arginase inhibitor nor-NOHA blocked suppressive activity of monocytic MDSC but not granulocytic MDSC (Fig. 3⇑H).
We asked whether there was a difference in the ability of MDSC subsets to differentiate in vitro. CD11b+Ly6G+Ly6Clow granulocytic and CD11b+Ly6G−Ly6Chigh monocytic MDSC were sorted as described and cultured in the presence of GM-CSF for 3 and 5 days. During culture monocytic MDSC did not acquire markers of granulocytic MDSC and vice versa (data not shown). However, major differences were found in the ability of these subsets to acquire markers of mature myeloid cells. Granulocytic MDSC retained immature Gr-1+ CD11b+ phenotype during 5-day culture, whereas monocytic MDSC rapidly differentiated. By day 3, less than half of the cells retained immature phenotype and by day 5 only one-third of cells were Gr-1+CD11b+ cells (Fig. 4⇓A). A bit more than 10% of granulocytic MDSC differentiated into CD11c+ dendritic cells, whereas more than 50% of cells differentiated from monocytic MDSC were CD11c+ cells (Fig. 4⇓B). An ∼20% of granulocytic MDSC acquired F4/80 marker specific for macrophages comparing with more than 60% of cells differentiated from monocytic MDSC (Fig. 4⇓C). Please note that total proportion of CD11c+, F4/80+, and Gr-1+ cells is higher than 100% because some of the cells express several of these markers. This result may reflect different stages of myeloid cell differentiation.
Potential role of B7 family molecules in MDSC-mediated T cell suppression in cancer
Previous studies have demonstrated that Gr-1+CD11b+ IMC isolated from spleens of naive mice lack suppressive activity against T cells, whereas cells with similar phenotype (Gr-1+CD11b+) from tumor-bearing mice showed potent suppressive activity. Therefore, if MDSC subset expressing specific surface marker is truly responsible for the MDSC function, then its proportion among MDSC should be substantially higher than among IMC or this cell population should have higher suppressive activity on a per cell basis. Based on this assumption, we investigated the role of various molecules in MDSC function.
Inhibitory PD-L1 and PD-L2 receptors of B7 family are expressed on the variety of myeloid cells and were shown to be directly involved in suppression of immune responses (36, 37). Another member of this family B7.1 (CD80) was recently implicated in MDSC-mediated immune suppression in ovarian carcinoma (38). We evaluated the level of the expression of these molecules on MDSC. Most of IMC and MDSC expressed PD-L1 and CD80 but not PD-L2 (data not shown). We compared the percentage of positive cells and the level of expression of these molecules between IMC from naive tumor-free mice and MDSC from tumor-bearing mice. No significant differences were found in the percentage of PD-L1- or CD80-positive cells within the populations of Gr-1+CD11b+ MDSC and Gr-1+CD11b+ IMC (data not shown). No increase in the level of expression of either PD-L1 or CD80 was found in MDSC compared with IMC. Moreover, in 6 of 10 tested tumor models, MDSC had significantly lower levels of PD-L1 expression than IMC (Fig. 5⇓A). Similar results were obtained after the analysis of CD80 expression. In two models the levels of CD80 expression on MDSC were significantly lower than those at IMC (Fig. 5⇓B). Lack of increased expression of these molecules in MDSC may suggest that PD-L1, PD-L2, and CD80 may have a limited role in MDSC-mediated immune suppression in cancer.
To directly test the functional role of PD-L1 in MDSC-mediated T cell suppression, expression of PD-L1 on MDSC surface was blocked in vitro using anti-PD-L1 Ab (Fig. 5⇑C). MDSC were then added at a 1:4 ratio to OT-1 splenocytes and incubated with control or specific peptides for 36 h. The response of CD8+ T cells was measured in IFN-γ ELISPOT assay. Block of PD-L1 expression did not eliminate suppressive activity of MDSC (Fig. 5⇑D). In another set of experiments, CD8+ T cell tolerance was induced in mice after an adoptive transfer of OT-1 T cells and MDSC as previously described (18, 35). Anti-PD-L1 Ab was i.p. injected three times: 2 days before cell transfer and immunization, 2 days after immunization of mice, and 3 days later. Treatment of mice with anti-PD-L1 Ab was not able to eliminate or reduce MDSC-induced T cell tolerance (Fig. 5⇑E).
Potential role of M-CSF receptor and IL-4R in MDSC-mediated T cell suppression in cancer
It has been previously reported that CD11b+ cells expressing M-CSF receptor (CD115) or IL-4Rα (CD124) had potent immunosuppressive activity (22, 23). In our study most of MDSC expressed both these receptors (Fig. 6⇓, A and B and data not shown). However, in only two models (EL-4 and DA3), the level of IL-4R (CD124) in MDSC was significantly higher than in IMC (Fig. 6⇓A). Similar selectivity was observed in the expression of CD115. In only two of the tested models (DA3 and MC38), the level of CD115 in MDSC was significantly higher than in IMC, whereas in three models (EL-4, B16, and CT26) it was substantially lower (Fig. 6⇓B).
To compare immune suppressive activity of these cells, five populations were sorted from spleens of EL-4 tumor-bearing mice: total population of Gr-1+CD11b+ MDSC; Gr-1+CD11b+CD115+; Gr-1+CD11b+CD115−; Gr-1+CD11b+CD124+; and Gr-1+CD11b+CD124− (Fig. 7⇓A). Cells were then added at different ratios to OT-1 splenocytes and incubated in the presence of OT-1 specific or control peptides. CD8+ T cell response was evaluated in IFN-γ ELIPOST assay and proliferation assay. At a 1:5 ratio, all five populations significantly inhibited CD8+ T cells response (Fig. 7⇓, B and C). At 1:10 and 1:20 ratio, suppressive effect was undetectable in all populations. No differences in the level of suppressive activity were detected between all these populations. Thus, at least in EL-4 tumor model expression of CD115 or IL-4Rα did not render MDSC more or less immune suppressive.
In recent years an important role of MDSC in tumor-associated immune suppression has been established in a large number of studies (reviewed in Refs. 2, 4, 39). Besides cancer, an increased production of MDSC was also reported in a number of pathological conditions including traumatic stress and bacterial and parasitic infections (24, 40, 41). It became apparent that MDSC does not represent single cell population but in fact are comprised of immature myeloid cells at different stages of cell differentiation (12, 42, 43, 44, 45). The characterization of specific subset of these cells, primarily responsible for tumor-associated immune suppression, would be very important for understanding the biology of these cells and mechanisms of tumor escape. To address this question, we used 10 different tumor models on three different mouse strains. The purpose of using a broad array of different types of tumor was to establish common mechanisms of MDSC expansion in cancer. MDSC are produced in a response to a variety of tumor-derived factors. These factors differ from one tumor model to another. This may explain the often contradictory results regarding the phenotype of these cells reported in different studies. We found that although the level of MDSC was significantly elevated in all tumor models the extent of MDSC expansion varied between different tumor models. Sarcomas demonstrated the lowest level of MDSC expansion, whereas breast carcinoma, thymoma, and colon carcinoma the highest. Our in vitro data suggest that the level of MDSC expansion was determined by the nature of soluble factors produced by tumors. Currently, the number of factors affecting myeloid cell expansion in cancer has been proposed. They include COX-2 and prostaglandins (46, 47, 48), stem cell factor (49), GM-CSF (50), VEGF (51), CXCR2 ligands (10) and others. Detailed characterization of the factors responsible for MDSC accumulation was outside the scope of this investigation. However, the described differences in the level of MDSC between different tumor models could be exploited for identification of the specific tumor-derived factors mediating this phenomenon. It is not clear at this time whether these findings are directly attributed to cancer patients. Previous and recent studies have demonstrated a substantial expansion of MDSC in cancer patients that correlated with the stage of the disease (11, 13, 14, 16). However, a direct comparison between different types of cancer has not been performed yet.
It is known that population of Gr-1+CD11b+ cells are comprised of two subsets: cells with granulocytic phenotype that express Ly6G marker and cells with monocytic phenotype expressing Ly6C marker. Recent reports indicated that these two populations might have different functions in infectious and autoimmune diseases and cancer (10, 31, 32, 33). Our data demonstrated expansion of only one subset Ly6G+Ly6ClowCD11b+ granulocytic MDSC in most of the tumor models. This result would seem to contradict with a recently reported study that demonstrated both populations were equally increased in mice bearing T cell lymphoma and thymoma (33). However, this case underscores the importance of analysis of the wide range of tumors to draw a conclusion regarding the potential role of MDSC subsets in cancer. In our study EL-4 tumor model was one of the notable exceptions showing that its monocytic subset of MDSC was substantially expanded. This tumor was precisely the type used in a previous study (33). Apparently, various tumor-derived factors produced by different types of tumor cells define the expansion of MDSC subsets. The exact nature of these factors needs to be determined.
Our data demonstrated that these two populations used different mechanisms of T cell suppression. Granulocytic subset of MDSC expressed a high level of ROS and very little NO, whereas monocytic subset had very little ROS but a high level of NO. Accordingly immune suppressive activity of granulocytic MDSC was blocked by ROS inhibitor catalase, whereas activity of monocytic subset of MDSC by inducible NO synthase inhibitor LMMA. Interestingly despite that different mechanism of action, both populations suppressed Ag-specific T cell function equally. This result may explain why MDSC-mediated T cell suppression is observed in all tested tumor models regardless of the type of MDSC subset that preferentially expanded. Both populations of MDSC had increased level of peroxynitrite. This increase is not surprising because peroxynitrite is a product of interaction between NO and superoxide. Therefore, either increased level of ROS or NO would result in an increased peroxynitrite level. Observed differences in the levels of peroxynitrite between monocytic and granulocytic subsets apparently were not sufficient to significantly affect their T cell suppressive activity. More studies are needed to clarify exact role of specific mechanisms mediating immune suppression by these MDSC subsets.
We have investigated the potential role of a number of different surface molecules implicated in immune suppressive activity of MDSC. To determine that specific population of MDSC has a specific role in T cell suppression, we used two basic principles. This population should be either preferentially expanded in tumor-bearing mice or have a higher suppression activity per cell basis. As a baseline we used Gr-1+CD11b+ IMC isolated from spleens of naive tumor-free mice. It is known that these cells are not able to induce T cell suppression (18, 19, 20, 21). Members of the B7 family inhibitory molecules like PD-L1 and PD-L2 and receptors of B7 family CD80 are expressed on a variety of myeloid cells and were shown to be directly involved in the suppression of immune responses (36, 37). Although the total number of MDSC expressing these molecules was increased in tumor-bearing mice, there was no preferential accumulation of the cells expressing PD-L1, PD-L2, or CD80 in any of tested tumor model. Moreover in most of the models we observed a significant decrease in the level of expression of these molecules compared with control IMC. Direct experiments with block of PD-L1 in vitro or in vivo did not prevent an inhibitory effect of MDSC. These data indicate that these molecules may not necessarily be directly involved in T cell suppression by MDSC.
CD11b+ cells expressing M-CSF receptor (CD115) or IL-4Rα (CD124) have been shown to have immunosuppressive activity (22, 23). We found higher levels of CD115 and CD124 expression in only two tumor models (DA3 breast carcinoma for both receptors, EL-4 thymoma for CD124, and MC38 colon carcinoma for CD115). After sorting of these cells, we found that IL-4Rα- and M-CSF receptor-positive MDSC suppressed Ag-specific T cell responses at the same level as nonseparated MDSC.
Our data support previous observation that MDSC expressing M-CSF receptor or IL-4Rα have potent immune suppressive activity (22, 23). However, they also indicate that the role of these molecules apparently is restricted to only few tumor models and at least in EL-4 tumor-bearing mice these cells are equally potent in suppressing T cells.
Our data may clarify the nature of immune suppressive activity of MDSC in cancer. These cells represent not a defined subset of cells but rather a group of phenotypic heterogeneous myeloid cells that are bound together by common biological activity rather than specific phenotypic characteristics. It is possible that immune suppression activity of MDSC is not restricted to one or several subsets of these cells, but rather attributed to an entire population of these cells that reflect the biology of these cells in cancer.
We thank Drs. W. Kast, D. Lopez, L. J. Old, Ostrand-Rosenberg, E. Celis, I. Turkova, and K. Knutson for providing tumor cell lines. We thank Dr. L. Chen for providing neutralizing anti-PD-L1 Ab.
The authors have no financial conflict of interest.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
↵1 This work was supported by Grant CA84488 from the National Institutes of Health (to D.I.G.). This work was supported in part by the Analytic Microscopy and Flow Cytometry Core Facility at the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center.
↵2 J.-I.Y. and S.N. contributed equally to this work.
↵3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Dmitry I. Gabrilovich, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, MRC 2067, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612. E-mail address:
↵4 Abbreviations used in this paper: MDSC, myeloid-derived suppressor cell; ROS, reactive oxygen species; TCCM, tumor cell conditioned medium; IMC, immature myeloid cell.
- Received May 29, 2008.
- Accepted August 18, 2008.
- Copyright © 2008 by The American Association of Immunologists