Abstract
CpG DNA induces plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDC) to produce type I IFN and chemokines. However, it has not been fully elucidated how the TLR9 signaling pathway is linked to these gene expressions. We examined the mechanisms involving the TLR9 and type I IFN signaling pathways, in relation to CpG DNA-induced IFN-α, IFN regulatory factor (IRF)-7, and chemokines CXCL10 and CCL3 in human pDC. In pDC, NF-κB subunits p65 and p50 were constitutively activated. pDC also constitutively expressed IRF-7 and CCL3, and the gene expressions seemed to be regulated by NF-κB. CpG DNA enhanced the NF-κB p65/p50 activity, which collaborated with p38 MAPK to up-regulate the expressions of IRF-7, CXCL10, and CCL3 in a manner independent of type I IFN signaling. We then examined the pathway through which IFN-α is expressed. Type I IFN induced the expression of IRF-7, but not of IFN-α, in a NF-κB-independent way. CpG DNA enabled the type I IFN-treated pDC to express IFN-α in the presence of NF-κB/p38 MAPK inhibitor, and chloroquine abrogated this effect. With CpG DNA, IRF-7, both constitutively and newly expressed, moved to the nuclei independently of NF-κB/p38 MAPK. These findings suggest that, in CpG DNA-stimulated human pDC, the induction of IRF-7, CXCL10, and CCL3 is mediated by the NF-κB/p38 MAPK pathway, and that IRF-7 is activated upstream of the activation of NF-κB/p38 MAPK in chloroquine-sensitive regulatory machinery, thereby leading to the expression of IFN-α.
Dendritic cells (DC)3 consist of a heterogeneous population of APC that regulates immune responses. They are characterized by surface markers and cytokines induced in response to inflammatory stimuli, including the ligands for TLRs (1), which recognize distinct families of pathogenic products. Among DC, plasmacytoid DCs (pDC) are a unique population exhibiting plasmacytoid morphology (2). The biological distinction of pDC is that they produce a large amount of IFN-α through the ligation of TLR9 (3) with bacterial DNA or its synthetic counterpart, the so-called oligoDNA containing unmethylated CpG motifs (CpG DNA) (4, 5, 6). They also produce chemokines (7, 8, 9); through the interplay with the IFN-α, pDC participate not only in innate immunity but also in adaptive immunity (2).
Due to the identification of pDC and the discovery of microbial inducers of IFN-α, IFN-α has recently been recognized as a multifunctional cytokine (2, 10). IFN-α, as a member of the type I IFN-family, deliver signals to the classical type I IFN pathway via IFN-αβ receptor, and consequently the genes whose promoters carry IFN-stimulated response elements (ISRE) are transcribed. IFN regulatory factor (IRF) 7 is one of the genes up-regulated by type I IFN (11, 12, 13). In pDC, however, IRF-7 is constitutively expressed (14, 15, 16, 17). Its association with MyD88 and TNF receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6) has recently been reported to be a prerequisite for the activation of the IFN promoter (18, 19).
Following ligation of TLR9, the adaptor MyD88 recruits signaling mediators to activate NF-κB (20). Therefore, most of the chemokines whose gene expression requires the activation of NF-κB could be induced through the TLR9 signaling in pDC. However, to our knowledge, there has not yet been any report that referred to the integral participation of NF-κB in the expression of IFN-α and chemokines in CpG DNA-stimulated human pDC. Recently, it has been demonstrated that, besides ISRE, the human IRF-7 gene promoter has a NF-κB binding site (21), and the activation of NF-κB is required for EBV latent membrane protein 1- and TNF-α-induced IRF-7 expression (21, 22). Then, we speculated that, in the end-point of TLR9 signaling, the activation of NF-κB could be involved in the up-regulation of the gene expression of IRF-7, subsequently of IFN-α, and that of other NF-κB-dependent chemokines in human pDC.
To examine our hypothesis, we used palindromic CpG DNA in an unmodified form as a natural ligand for TLR9; such DNA sequences were first reported to exist in bacillus Calmette-Guérin DNA and to induce type I IFN in mice and humans (23, 24). The gene expression of chemokines CXCL10 (IFN-γ-inducible protein-10) and CCL3 (MIP-1α) were examined in relation to IRF-7, because they are all expressed in human pDC following stimulation with CpG DNA (7, 8) and in other cells stimulated with IFN-α (25, 26), and they also have a NF-κB binding site in their gene promoters (21, 22, 27, 28). In addition, the clarification of the mechanism of IRF-7 and CXCL10 expression may help to discriminate the TLR9 signaling pathway from the type I IFN signaling pathway, because their gene promoters possess ISRE, besides the NF-κB site (11, 12, 13, 28). We first examined the kinetics of the induction of these chemokines in comparison with those of IFN-α, then the involvement of NF-κB in relation to p38 MAPK, which is important for CpG DNA-triggered gene expression (14, 29, 30), and finally the pathway for IRF-7 activation to cause IFN-α expression. We demonstrate in this study that 1) human pDC express constitutively activated NF-κB p65 and p50, which are possibly involved in the constitutive expression of IRF-7 and CCL3, 2) the activation of NF-κB by CpG DNA seems to play a crucial role in the type I IFN-independent induction of IRF-7, CXCL10, and CCL3, in collaboration with p38 MAPK, and 3) the signal(s) generated upstream of the TLR9 activation of NF-κB/p38 MAPK would be required for the expression of IFN-α, most likely through the activation of IRF-7 in the chloroquine-sensitive regulatory machinery.
Materials and Methods
Oligonucleotides (ODN)
The ODN used in this study were purchased from Hokkaido System Science and added to the culture at 5 μM. Phosphodiester GGGGGGGGGGGACGATCGTCGGGGGGGGGG (denoted as palGACGA1010 hereafter), identical with g10gacga described previously (14), was used as the IFN-α-inducing-type of CpG DNA in an unmodified form to avoid nonspecific activity, which may be caused by the phosphorothioate modification, because the CG-conversion to GC in the phosphorothioate form continued to exhibit activity to some extent in signaling assays in our preliminary experiments. Phosphodiester GGGGGGGGGGGAGCATGCTCGGGGGGGGGG was used as the control of palGACGA1010 (denoted as “control ODN” in this study). Phosphodiester 30-mer G (G30) and T (T30) were used for poly(G) and poly(T), respectively.
Reagents
The reagents added to the culture were as follows: actinomycin D (Act D), cycloheximide (CHX), dextran sulfate, fucoidan, wortmannin, chloroquine, pyrrolidinedithiocarbamate (PDTC), caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE), dexamethasone (DEX), polymixin B (PMX), and LPS from Sigma-Aldrich; anti-CD118 Ab and recombinant human IFN-αs and IFN-β from Pestka Biochemical Laboratories; SB203580, SB202474, PD98059, isohelenin, and chondroitin sulfate from Calbiochem.
Isolation and culture of pDC
PBMC were isolated from the peripheral blood of healthy volunteers (negative for HIV, hepatitis B virus, and hepatitis C virus; normal blood cell counts and sera enzymes/proteins; and without fever, medication, or symptomatic allergies) with informed consent, and a low-density fraction was separated on 47.5% Percoll (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). pDC were then enriched as blood DC Ag (BDCA)4-positive cells by positive sorting with anti-BDCA4-Ab (Miltenyi Biotec) and Dynabeads M-450 goat anti-mouse IgG (Dynal Biotech), or as lineage marker−/CD11c−/CD4+ cells by depleting the cells which reacted with Dynabeads CD14 (Dynal Biotech), and then with the anti-CD3/CD19/CD16/CD56/CD11c mAb (BD Biosciences Pharmingen) followed by Dynabeads M-450 goat anti-mouse IgG (Dynal Biotech). The positively sorted fraction contained >98% BDCA4 cells when assessed microscopically and was used for most of the experiments. The lineage marker−/CD11c−/CD4+ fraction contained >85% BDCA4 cells when analyzed by flow cytometry and was used for the analysis of phosphorylated p38 MAPK/STAT1. pDC were cultured at 1–2 × 106/ml in RPMI 1640 (Sigma-Aldrich) containing 10% heat-inactivated FCS (Equitech-Bio; endotoxins <0.03 ng/ml). In some experiments, PMX was added to prevent a response that would have otherwise been caused by a contamination of LPS in the reagents (31). Different donors’ pDC were cultured individually, and if necessary, pooled together to obtain an adequate cell number for analysis.
Real-time RT-PCR
Preparation of whole-cell, cytoplasmic, and nuclear extracts
Whole-cell, cytoplasmic, and nuclear extracts were prepared using TransAM Nuclear Extract Kits (Active Motif) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
NF-κB activity
pDC were harvested, and whole-cell lysates or nuclear extracts were prepared. NF-κB activities were measured using TransAM NF-κB Kits (Active Motif) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Flow cytometry
Cells were fixed in PBS with 2% paraformaldehyde, and then permeabilized in 90% methanol. Cells were then stained with Alexa Fluor-conjugated anti-phospho-p38 MAPK Ab (BD Pharmingen), Alexa Fluor-conjugated anti-phospho-STAT1 Ab (BD Pharmingen), or isotype control, and analyzed using the EPICS XL ADC System (Beckman Coulter).
ELISA
Cytokine/chemokine concentrations of cell-free culture supernatants were measured using ELISA kits (BioSource International), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Western blotting
The normalized amounts of cell extracts were electrophoresed on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Millipore). The transblotted membranes were blocked with skim-milk and stained with a polyclonal Ab against IRF-7 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), Histone 1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), or GAPDH (Chemicon International) followed by staining with HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit Ab (Amersham Biosciences) or with HRP-conjugated anti-mouse Ab (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Signals were detected using ECL reagents (Amersham Biosciences) and exposed to films.
Statistical analysis
Statistical significance was evaluated using Student’s or paired t test at p < 0.05.
Results
CpG DNA induces human pDCs to express CXCL10 and CCL3 in addition to IFN-α
The sequence of palGACGA1010 used in this study is composed of palindromic 5′-GACGATCGTC-3′ as the core sequence, with 10-mer G at each 5′ and 3′ site as the flanking sequence. Because the GACGATCGTC sequence exists in the bacterial genomes, with various numbers of G on each side, we used the palGACGA1010 in unmodified phosphodiester form as a counterpart of bacterial DNA, which has previously been shown to have immunostimulatory activity in mice and humans (14, 32).
In pDC freshly isolated and mock-cultured, mRNAs for IFN-αs, β, and ω, and CXCL10 were barely detectable, whereas mRNAs for CCL3 and IFN-κ were observed at a substantial level. Consistent with the data reported by Coccia et al. (17), in which the prototype palindromic CpG DNA, AAC-30 (23), was used, palGACGA1010 up-regulated the expression of all of the genes with the exception of IFN-κ (Fig. 1⇓A). Control ODN did not induce any of these genes. In the following experiments, the expression of IFN-α was represented by IFN-α1/13, and palGACGA1010 by CpG DNA, unless otherwise stated.
CpG DNA induces human pDC to express CXCL10 and CCL3, in addition to type I IFNs. A, pDC were cultured for 16 h with CpG DNA, control ODN, or medium alone, and RT-PCR was performed for the genes indicated. Data are from one of four separate experiments and shown as the mean relative expression levels in a triplicate assay. Three donors’ pDC were used for one set of assay. The CpG DNA gene induction for chemokines and type I IFNs, except that for IFN-κ, was statistically significant when compared with the respective controls. B, pDC were cultured for the time indicated, with medium alone or CpG DNA, and mRNA for each gene was assayed by RT-PCR. The expressions at 0, 2, 3, 4, and 5-h cultures were shown as the levels relative to that of 15-h culture with CpG DNA. Data shown are the mean ± SE of three independent experiments using different donors’ pDC. ∗, Statistically significant when compared with the respective controls with medium alone. C, pDC were cultured for 12 h with or without CpG DNA in the presence or absence of PMX (50 U/ml) or Act D (5 μg/ml). The concentrations of IFN-α, CXCL10, and CCL3 in the culture supernatants were measured by ELISA. Data shown are representative of three independent experiments using pDC from different donors and shown as the mean ± SD in a triplicate assay. ∗, Statistically significant when compared with the respective controls.
The time needed for up-regulation by CpG DNA of the gene expression varied somewhat among individuals, but the patterns were always similar between IFN-α, CXCL10, and CCL3 in a given pDC preparation. The data from three donors are shown in Fig. 1⇑B. In general, the gene expression for IFN-α became obvious around 4–5 h later, with transient expression as early as 2–3 h, after the stimulation with CpG DNA. The time course of CXCL10 expression was nearly similar to that of IFN-α. The expression of CCL3 spontaneously increased, and this increase was observed regardless of the isolation method of pDC (i.e., positive or negative isolation) and regardless of the presence of a LPS inhibitor, PMX. The up-regulation of CCL3 mRNA by CpG DNA was weaker when compared with that of IFN-α and CXCL10. However, the 2.5- to 4.5-fold increase in the 8-h culture (n = 4; data not shown) showed that gene induction of CCL3 by CpG DNA is substantial. The extent of the up-regulation of CCL3 mRNA may have been masked due to the spontaneous expression, which rapidly increased by 2–3 h and decreased along with the culture period.
In accordance with the gene induction, the production of IFN-α, CXCL10, and CCL3 were also increased (Fig. 1⇑C). Their up-regulation was not inhibited by the addition of PMX. Treatment of pDC with Act D abrogated the production of these proteins, indicating the de novo synthesis of CXCL10 and CCL3, in addition to IFN-α.
The expression of IFN-α, CXCL10, and CCL3 can be induced directly by the CpG DNA stimulation
Because IFN-α is capable of inducing CXCL10 and CCL3 (25, 26), type I IFNs induced by the CpG DNA stimulation may cause the expression of these chemokines through the activation of the IFN-αβ receptor. We stimulated pDC with representative type I IFN isotypes and confirmed that CXCL10 and CCL3 were expressed, as was IRF-7 that was used as a representative type I IFN-inducible gene (Fig. 2⇓A). However, CpG DNA elicited the expression of these chemokines even when the IFN-αβ receptor was blocked with anti-CD118 Ab; no statistical difference in their expression between the culture with and without Ab was observed (Fig. 2⇓B). Up-regulation of CXCL10 and CCL3 by CpG DNA thus appears to be initiated in a manner independent of the type I IFN response in pDC. This is consistent with the IFN-α-independent induction of IRF-7 and IFN-α, which we (14) and Kerkmann et al. (15) have previously reported, and we again show the data regarding the IFN-α expression in Fig. 2⇓B. For the prolonged expression of IFN-α, however, an autocrine response to type I IFN may be required, because the treatment of pDC with CD118 Ab partially suppressed the induction of IFN-α by CpG DNA.
Type I IFNs induce pDC to express CXCL10 and CCL3, but not IFN-α, whereas CpG DNA induces them to express IFN-α, CXCL10, and CCL3 in the presence of CD118 Ab. A, pDC were cultured overnight with medium alone, CpG DNA, control ODN, or 1000 IU/ml IFN-α1, α2, α4, α8, or β, and the genes for IFN-α, CXCL10, and CCL3 were measured, along with that for IRF-7 as a positive control. Data shown are the mean ± SE of four independent experiments. ∗, Statistically significant vs medium alone. B, pDC were pretreated for medium, 1 μg/ml mouse IgG2a (isotype control), or 1 μg/ml anti-CD118 Ab, which we confirmed blocked IFN-α-induced STAT1 phosphorylation in preliminary experiments, and cultured for 12 h (a) or 18 h (b) with or without CpG DNA. PCR (a) and ELISA (b) were performed to assess IFN-α, CXCL10, and CCL3 induction. Data are shown as the mean ± SE of the percentage of the values with CpG DNA in three to six experiments using different donors’ pDC. The level of IFN-α, CXCL10, and CCL3 mRNA or the amounts of each protein in the culture with CpG DNA+CD118 Ab were statistically higher when compared with the respective controls with medium alone. ∗, Statistically lower when compared with the respective values in the culture with CpG DNA alone. No effect of the isotype control on the CpG DNA-induced IFN-α/CXCL10/CCL3 production was observed in the separate set of experiments (data not shown).
Scavenger receptor (SR)-A ligand-sensitive pathway and endosomal maturation is required for the induction of CXCL10 and CCL3 as it is for IFN-α
To confirm that the CXCL10 and CCL3 are induced via endosomal maturation, a pathway which is essential for the CpG DNA induction of IFN-α expression (14), pDC were preincubated for 1 h with chloroquine, an inhibitor of endosomal maturation (29), and cultured with CpG DNA for 12–18 h. As shown in Fig. 3⇓, the production of these chemokines was significantly inhibited, as was that of IFN-α, indicating that CXCL10 and CCL3 are induced through the endosomal maturation of CpG DNA. We then tested wortmannin, an inhibitor of the class I/III PI3 kinases that facilitate phagocytosis, endocytosis, and endosomal maturation (33), and fucoidan, dextran sulfate, or poly-G, a ligand for SR-A, which is a likely candidate involved in the endocytosis of CpG DNA (34, 35), following a similar protocol to that described above. CpG DNA inductions of IFN-α, CXCL10, and CCL3 were all abrogated, without decreasing cell viability, by the pretreatment of pDC with wortmannin or SR-A ligands. The equivalent amount of the solvent DMSO, or chondroitin sulfate or poly-T used as a control of dextran sulfate or poly-G, respectively, did not alter the levels of the cytokines produced. These results suggest that the SR-A ligand-sensitive pathway is involved in the CpG DNA-induced IFN-α/chemokine production in pDC.
SR-A ligand-sensitive pathway and endosomal maturation are required for the CpG DNA-induction of CXCL10 and CCL3 as it is for IFN-α induction. pDC were cultured for 12–18 h with medium or CpG DNA in the presence or absence of chloroquine (0.2 μg/ml), wortmannin (1 and 0.1 μM), fucoidan (5 and 0.5 μg/ml), dextran sulfate (10 μg/ml), chondroitin sulfate (10 μg/ml), poly-G (5 μM), or poly-T (5 μM). The reagents’ concentrations used in this experiment did not cause cell death. The amounts of IFN-α, CXCL10, and CCL3 in culture supernatants were measured by ELISA and expressed as the percentage of the values with CpG DNA alone. Data from three independent experiments were shown in the mean ± SE. The values with chloroquine, wortmannin, fucoidan, dextran sulfate, and poly-G were statistically small when compared with the respective controls with CpG DNA alone.
The p38 MAPK pathway involved in the induction of IFN-α is also required for that of CXCL10 and CCL3
We previously demonstrated that p38 MAPK is involved in the induction of IFN-α expression by CpG DNA (14). To determine the signaling pathway through which the chemokine production is induced, the effect of p38 MAPK inhibitor SB203580 was examined. As shown in Fig. 4⇓A, the production of both CXCL10 and CCL3 by CpG DNA was decreased by the treatment of pDC with this agent, as was the IFN-α production, with the degree of inhibition being weaker in CXCL10. The IC50 for IFN-α, CXCL10, and CCL3 production were ∼2, 3, and 6 μM, respectively. The control analog SB202474 did not alter these chemokine productions at the concentrations equivalent to the effective concentrations of SB203580. No decrease in the viability of pDC treated with the agent or the equivalent amount of its solvent DMSO (<0.1%) was observed during the time of incubation. In a murine macrophage-like cell line, ERK pathway is indispensable for the CpG DNA signaling (36). However, in human pDC, treatment with PD98059 did not produce substantial inhibition for these cytokine productions (Fig. 4⇓B). p38 MAPK thus seems to be required not only for the CpG DNA induction of IFN-α, but also for that of CXCL10 and CCL3, in human pDC. In the experiments described hereafter, 10–20 μM of SB203580 was used because this agent sufficiently inhibited (>70% inhibition) IFN-α/CXCL10/CCL3 production with these concentrations.
The p38 MAPK pathway involved in the induction of IFN-α is also required for that of CXCL10 and CCL3. A, pDC were precultured for 1 h with or without various concentrations of SB208530 or SB202474, and cultured for 14 h with medium (med.) or CpG DNA (CpG). The amounts of IFN-α, CXCL10, and CCL3 in the culture supernatants were measured by ELISA, and the effects of the reagents were expressed by the percentages of the values in the culture with CpG DNA alone (in the case of CpG DNA-induced CCL3, the spontaneously produced amounts were subtracted). The equivalent amount of their solvent DMSO did not alter the levels of the cytokine productions (data not shown). Data shown are the mean ± SE of three independent experiments using different donor’s pDC. B, pDC were treated for 2 h with or without 10 μM of SB203580 (SB), or 10 or 20 μM of PD98059 (PD), and cultured for 14 h with or without CpG DNA (CpG). The amounts of cytokines in the culture supernatants were measured by ELISA and expressed by the percentages of the values in the culture with CpG DNA alone. Data are shown as the mean ± SE of three independent experiments using different donor’s pDC. ∗, Significantly decreased compared with the respective controls with CpG DNA alone.
NF-κB p65 and p50 are constitutively activated in pDC, and their activities are up-regulated by CpG DNA
There would be a common pathway, in CpG DNA-stimulated pDC, between the gene induction for IFN-α and those for the chemokines CXCL10 and CCL3, because their expressions were all independent of type I IFN receptor, but mediated by endosomal processing and p38 MAPK pathways (Figs. 2–4⇑⇑⇑). We therefore examined the involvement of NF-κB, which is a terminus of TLR9 signaling pathway, in the CpG DNA-induced CXCL10, CCL3, and IFN-α.
Because little information regarding the characteristics of NF-κB in human pDC has been reported, we first examined the activation status of various NF-κB family members, p65, p50, p52, cRel, and RelB, in fresh pDC, using an ELISA kit that allowed us to measure their binding to the consensus ODN. Although the binding activities varied greatly among various preparations of pDC, those of p65 and p50 were considered to be significant, because their activities disappeared by the addition of wild type, but not the mutated probe (Fig. 5⇓A). Those of p52, cRel, and RelB were hardly detectable. When pDC were treated for 3 h with CpG DNA, only the binding activities of p65 and p50, but not those of p52, cRel, or RelB, were enhanced (Fig. 5⇓B). Control ODN did not increase the activities for any members of the NF-κB family. Among the individual pDC tested, the increments of the p65 and p50 activities were moderate with 1.25–1.51 (n = 5) and 1.25–2.84 (n = 7) fold, respectively, but were statistically significant when analyzed across the experiments. Because the IκB gene is immediately accessible to NF-κB and is transcribed immediately after NF-κB recruitment (37), the expression of IκBα mRNA was analyzed as an alternative way to evaluate functional activity of NF-κB; the increase by CpG DNA was shown as 3-fold on average (Fig. 5⇓C). The modest increment of the binding activities by CpG DNA stimulation may be accounted for by their constitutive activation.
NF-κB p65 and p50 are constitutively activated in pDC, and their activities are up-regulated by CpG DNA. A, Different donors’ pDC were pooled, and their nuclear proteins were analyzed in triplicate for the binding activity of NF-κB family members using TransAM NFκB Kits. Values (mean ± SD) are representative data from one of five independent sets of experiments. ∗, Statistically significant when compared with the respective controls. ND, not done. B, Left: pDC were stimulated with CpG DNA for 3 h, and the whole-cell lysates were analyzed for the binding activity of NF-κB. Data are shown as the fold increase (mean ± SE) of seven (1.25- to 2.84-fold) and five (1.25- to 1.51-fold) separate experiments, for p50 and p65 activities, respectively. ∗, Statistically significant when compared with the respective controls. Right, pDC from two different donors were individually cultured for 3 h with medium, CpG DNA, or control ODN, the cells cultured under the same conditions were pooled, and expression of IκBα was analyzed by real-time PCR in triplicate (mean ± SD). Another set of experiments using different donors’ pDC resulted in the similar result. ∗, Statistically significant when compared with the control with medium alone. C, pDC were preincubated with 1 μM of PDTC for 1 h and subsequently cultured for 5 h with CpG DNA or medium. The expression of mRNA for IRF-7/IFN-α/CXCL10/CCL3 was measured by RT-PCR. Data are the mean ± SE from three independent experiments. ∗, Significantly decreased compared with the respective controls with CpG DNA alone. D, pDC were precultured for 1 h with or without 5 μg/ml CAPE and subsequently cultured for 6 h with medium, IFN-α2a (200 IU/ml), or CpG DNA. The expression of IRF-7 and CXCL10 was analyzed by RT-PCR for three different donors’ pDC (mean ± SE). ∗, Statistically significant when compared with the respective controls without CAPE. Inhibition of IFN-α-induced IRF-7 and CXCL10 by CAPE was, if any, partial and did not reach a significant level. In three other individual experiments using different NF-κB inhibitors and different concentrations of IFN-α2a (100–2000 IU/ml), the inhibition was 5–53% in IRF-7 and 8–43% in CXCL10.
CpG DNA activation of NF-κB mediates the up-regulation of CXCL10 and CCL3 as well as that of IFN-α via the up-regulation of IRF-7
To examine the involvement of NF-κB activation in the induction of IFN-α/CXCL10/CCL3, we performed a pharmacological inhibitor-inhibition test, because the biological natures of human pDC, such as a tiny population in blood, a loss of TLR9 during the culture, and an expression of IFN-α in response to short-interfering RNA (38), restrict the experimental designs.
pDC were pretreated with PDTC (an antioxidant that inhibits IκB phosphorylation (39)) or CAPE (which prevents the translocation of NF-κB and its binding to DNA, but not IκB degradation (40)), and cultured for 14–16 h with CpG DNA. The CpG DNA induction of IFN-α/CXCL10/CCL3 was inhibited by each inhibitor with almost the same concentrations of both a half maximum and a maximum inhibition: these values obtained from three donor’s pDC were around 0.1 and 1.0 μM for PDTC, and 1.0 and 3.0 μg/ml for CAPE. The inhibitions were also observed with the non-antioxidant inhibitor of NF-κB, isohelenin, which has been reported to act as a highly specific inhibitor of NF-κB activation by preventing IκBα degradation (41), at 1 μM of half maximum and 5 μM of maximum inhibitory concentrations. These inhibitors did not cause cell death even at the maximum inhibition concentrations during the time of incubation in this study. Their effectiveness was confirmed in our preliminary experiments using other cells and/or pDC. DMSO, at the concentrations carried in the culture as a vehicle for CAPE/isohelenin, did not alter the level of these cytokine productions.
Because IFN-α gene does not have NF-κB binding site, the involvement of NF-κB in the IFN-α induction may possibly be through the NF-κB-mediated expression of IRF-7 (21, 22, 31). Indeed, in pDC pretreated with PDTC, a marked reduction in the CpG DNA-induced expression of IRF-7 was observed with concurrent inhibition in that of IFN-α/CXCL10/CCL3 (Fig. 5⇑C). Type I IFN induced IRF-7 expression in pDC (Fig. 2⇑A), and this pathway was in part involved in the augmentation of IFN-α production by CpG DNA (Fig. 2⇑B). Noteworthy, however, is the fact that no contribution or if any, only partial, of NF-κB to the type I IFN-induced IRF-7 expression was observed (Fig. 5⇑D, left). This was also the case for CXCL10 (Fig. 5⇑D, right), which is known as the type I IFN-inducible gene. The expression of type I IFN-inducible genes seem to be triggered via the NF-κB pathway when pDC are activated by CpG DNA.
IRF-7 and CCL3 are constitutively expressed in pDC (Figs. 1–3⇑⇑⇑ and 5⇑). These expressions may be associated with the constitutively activated NF-κB (Fig. 5⇑A). We cultured pDC with NF-κB inhibitors and found that the basal levels of IRF-7 and CCL3 mRNA decreased during the culture (Figs. 5⇑, C and D, and 8⇓B). Our results indicate that NF-κB is involved in both the constitutive and CpG DNA-induced gene expressions.
CpG DNA causes collaborative activation in p38 MAPK and NF-κB
Because the CXCL10, CCL3, and IFN-α inductions were all suppressed by either p38 MAPK or NF-κB inhibitor, the relationship between these pathways was examined using their respective inhibitors. As shown in Fig. 6⇓A, the CpG DNA enhancement of p65 and p50 activities was abrogated following the treatment with SB203580. The CpG DNA induction of phosphorylation of p38 MAPK was also prevented by NF-κB inhibitors (Fig. 6⇓B, left). We previously reported that the induction of STAT1 phosphorylation by CpG DNA, but not by type I IFN, is mediated by p38 MAPK (14). Therefore, given that p38 MAPK activation is mediated by NF-κB, the activation of NF-κB should increase the STAT1 phosphorylation as well. Indeed, PDTC treatment of pDC decreased STAT1 phosphorylation, which was up-regulated by the short-term culture with CpG DNA (Fig. 6⇓B, right). These results suggest that CpG DNA activates both the NF-κB and p38 MAPK pathways, through which NF-κB-dependent and/or p38 MAPK-dependent gene expression is induced.
CpG DNA causes collaborative activation in p38 MAPK and NF-κB. A, pDC were treated for 1 h with or without 10 μM SB203580, and cultured for 3 h with or without CpG DNA. The activities of NF-κB p50 and p65 were analyzed as described in Fig. 5⇑. Data are the mean ± SE of four separate experiments, where both or either of p50 and p65 was analyzed. ∗, Statistically significant when compared with the respective controls without CpG DNA. B, pDC were treated for 1 h with medium, PDTC (1 μM), or CAPE (5 μg/ml), and cultured for 3 h with CpG DNA, control ODN, or medium. Phosphorylation of p38 MAPK and STAT1 was analyzed by flow cytometry using Abs against their phosphorylated forms, and expressed as mean fluorescent intensity (MFI). Four independent experiments were repeated with similar results with different donors’ pDC. ∗, Statistically significant when compared with the respective controls with medium alone.
CpG DNA can directly up-regulate the expression of IRF-7
We previously reported that constitutively expressed IRF-7 moves to the nuclei in response to CpG DNA (14). This observation suggested that IFN-α induction by CpG DNA is triggered by the activation of constitutively expressed IRF-7. Indeed, CHX-treated pDC were able to express IFN-α in response to CpG DNA (Fig. 7⇓A). However, the data shown in Figs. 2⇑B and 5⇑D suggest that type I IFN signal-independent IRF-7 contributes to the expression of IFN-α. We then tested whether IRF-7 is induced directly by CpG DNA or not (Fig. 7⇓, B and C). Time kinetics for the IRF-7 induction by CpG DNA was first analyzed showing that the up-regulation started from 3 h, continuously increased for up to 16 h, and declined thereafter. The up-regulation of IRF-7 was observed even in the presence of CHX to an extent comparable to that in the absence of CHX, in a 5-h culture, by which time point the IFN-α gene is re-expressed (Fig. 1⇑B). At 12 h with CHX, the IRF-7 was continually expressed, although the level was lower than that in the absence of CHX, where the IRF-7 expression approaches a plateau through the autocrine response to type I IFN (Fig. 2⇑B). Addition of PMX to the culture did not prevent the induction of IRF-7 (data not shown). These results indicate that CpG DNA induces pDC to express IRF-7 in a manner independent of type I IFN signaling.
CpG DNA can up-regulate the expression of IRF-7 independently of protein synthesis. A, pDC were preincubated with or without 1 μg/ml CHX, which we confirmed blocked the CpG DNA-induced production of IFN-α, CXCL10, and CCL3, and cultured for 16 h with CpG DNA or medium alone. The expression of mRNA for IFN-α was analyzed by RT-PCR in three independent experiments. Data are shown in the mean ± SE; the level of mRNA for IFN-α in the culture with CpG DNA+CHX was statistically higher when compared with that with medium alone, but lower when compared with that with CpG DNA alone. B, pDC were preincubated with or without CpG DNA for the time indicated, and the mRNA for IRF-7 was analyzed by RT-PCR. The level of mRNA in the culture with CpG DNA was expressed as a value relative to the respective control in the culture with medium alone, and summarized in the mean ± SE at each time point, based on the data from five experiments. C, pDC were preincubated for 1 h with or without CHX, and cultured for 5 and 12 h with CpG DNA or medium. The expression of IRF-7 was analyzed by RT-PCR. Data are the mean ± SE of three independent experiments. No difference was observed between 5 and 12 h, in the levels of mRNA expressed in the culture with CHX+CpG DNA.
Signal(s) generated in chloroquine-sensitive machinery independently of NF-κB/p38 MAPK activation is required for the expression of IFN-α via the activation of IRF-7
It has recently been reported in mice that the TLR7/9-induction of IFN-α needs the phosphorylation of IRF-7, by IL-1 receptor-associated kinase-1, in a complex with MyD88 and TRAF6 (42). To prove the notion that, in CpG DNA-stimulated human pDC, IRF-7 is activated through signals upstream of NF-κB activation and, consequently, IFN-α is expressed, pDC were treated or not treated with IFN-β for 3 h, then incubated for 1 h with or without the inhibitors of p38 MAPK, NF-κB, or endosomal maturation, and successively cultured for 8 h with or without CpG DNA (Fig. 8⇓Aa). Treatment of pDC with 200 IU/ml IFN-β amplified IRF-7 expression 2- to 8-fold, which was enough to induce IFN-α to an extent detectable by ELISA. No alteration in the level of TLR9 mRNA was observed (data not shown). DEX was used to prevent the CpG DNA induction of IRF-7, because a synthetic glucocorticoid has been demonstrated to block the binding of NF-κB to the κB binding site as well as to interfere with STAT1 and p38 MAPK function (43, 44, 45). The inhibitory effect of DEX on the induction of IRF-7 was shown in Fig. 8⇓B with those of IFN-α/CXCL10/CCL3. The inhibition by SB203580 and/or chloroquine of the CpG DNA induction of IFN-α and/or IRF-7 is shown in Figs. 3⇑ and 4⇑, as well as in our previous report (14). Therefore, as an alternative to biochemical technique or gene manipulation, both of which require many phenotypically stable cells, the working design shown in Fig. 8⇓Ba could be useful for the assessment of the IRF-7 function for the induction of IFN-α in human pDC.
Machinery sensitive to chloroquine but not to NF-κB/p38 MAPK is involved in the expression of IFN-α via the activation of IRF-7. A, pDC were precultured for 3 h with or without 200 IU/ml IFN-β, and then for 1 h with DEX (0.5 μM), SB203580 (SB, 20 μM), chloroquine (chlo, 0.2 μg/ml), DEX + chlo, or medium. The culture was further continued for 8 h with or without CpG DNA. The amount of IFN-α in the culture supernatant was measured by ELISA, and converted to a value relative to the amount in the culture with CpG DNA alone. The experimental design is shown in a and the data in b with the mean ± SE from five experiments. The amounts of IFN-α in no. 9 and no. 10 were statistically higher than those in no. 3 and no. 4, respectively. B, pDC were pretreated for 1 h with DEX or medium, and cultured with medium or CpG DNA for 5 h (a) and 12 h (b). Expression of IRF-7 was analyzed by Western blot (a) and that of IFN-α, CXCL10, and CCL3 by ELISA (b), showing that the concentration of DEX used in A is effective to inhibit the CpG DNA induction of these proteins. C, pDC were pretreated for 1 h with or without SB203580, and cultured for 3 h with or without CpG DNA. The cytoplasmic and nuclear IRF-7 was analyzed by Western blot. Densitometry analysis showed that the density of IRF-7 in the cytoplasmic and nuclear fraction was 36 and 9 in unstimulated pDC, 28 and 57 in CpG DNA-stimulated pDC, and 17 and 28 in SB203580-terated pDC, respectively.
When stimulated with CpG DNA, pDC pretreated with IFN-β were capable of producing a substantial amount of IFN-α even in the presence of the inhibitors, although the extent of increase was low compared with that in the culture without inhibitors (Fig. 8⇑Ab). Similar results were observed when PDTC was used instead of DEX and when the expression of IFN-α mRNA was analyzed regarding the IFN-α-treated pDC (data not shown). Control ODN did not show any effect, and chloroquine abrogated this production. These results suggest that following the stimulation with CpG DNA, IRF-7 is most likely activated upstream of the NF-κB/p38 MAPK activation, probably in chloroquine-sensitive machinery, where CpG DNA is recognized by its specific receptor TLR9 (46, 47).
To verify the activation of IRF-7, we examined the nuclear translocation of IRF-7, as an alternative to phosphorylation or ubiquitination of IRF-7. In this experiment, 20 μM of SB203580 was used to completely inhibit p38 MAPK/NF-κB pathway, and consequently, to prevent the de novo synthesis of IRF-7. Fig. 8⇑C shows that IRF-7 moved to the nuclei independently of the activation of NF-κB/p38 MAPK. Densitometry analysis showed that the combined amount of cytoplasmic and nuclear IRF-7 was as high as 1.9-fold in the CpG DNA-stimulated pDC, but remained unchanged in the presence of SB203680. The rate of nuclear translocation increased from 20 to 67% following the stimulation with CpG DNA and also increased to 62% even when the CpG DNA induction of IRF-7 was inhibited by SB203580. We propose that CpG DNA induces human pDC not only to express but also to activate IRF-7, and that the former is NF-κB-dependent, whereas the later is independent.
Discussion
In this study, we investigated the mechanisms by which CpG DNA induces pDC to express IFN-α, CXCL10, and CCL3, and found that 1) human pDC express constitutively activated NF-κB p65 and p50, and the constitutively activated NF-κB appears to be involved in the constitutive expression of IRF-7 and CCL3; 2), the CpG DNA-activated NF-κB p65/p50 seems to play a crucial role in the type I IFN-independent induction of IRF-7, CXCL10, and CCL3, in collaboration with the p38 MAPK; 3) the signals generated upstream of the activation of NF-κB/p38 MAPK is involved in the expression of IFN-α, most likely through the activation of IRF-7 in chloroquine-sensitive machinery.
We demonstrate for the first time that pDC express constitutively activated NF-κB family proteins p65 and p50. Although we were unable to define for what purpose NF-κB is constitutively activated in pDC, this activation may render the genes, which are strongly regulated by NF-κB, pre-expressed, and thus efficiently up-regulated by the stimuli that exclusively activate the NF-κB pathway. A representative case is IRF-7, because IRF-7 was constitutively expressed (Figs. 2⇑A, 5⇑, C and D, 7⇑, B and C, and 8⇑, B and C); its expression level decreased in the culture with NF-κB inhibitor (Figs. 5⇑, C and D, and 8⇑B); IRF-7 was directly induced by CpG DNA (Fig. 7⇑C), which activated NF-κB (Fig. 5⇑B); and pDC failed to up-regulate IRF-7 when pretreated with NF-κB inhibitor (Figs. 5⇑, C and D, and 8⇑B). The facile expression of IRF-7 via NF-κB may cause pDC to more efficiently participate in an early defense system against the microbe infection. Another example is CCL3. CCL3 was constitutively expressed (Figs. 1–3⇑⇑⇑), and its expression was inhibited by NF-κB inhibitors (Fig. 5⇑C). This machinery may be important for the participation of pDC in early protection against HIV infection, because the CCL3 receptor, CCR5, acts as a coreceptor for macrophage-tropic HIV-1 strains (48). In this context, the constitutively activated NF-κB seems to represent one of the intrinsic characteristics of pDC.
The second point demonstrated in this study is that, in CpG DNA-stimulated pDC, the inductions of IRF-7, CXCL10, and CCL3, which can be induced by type I IFN stimulation (Fig. 2⇑A), all seem to be mediated by the activation of NF-κB (Fig. 5⇑C) independently of type I IFN signaling (Fig. 2⇑). Of particular interest is that the induction of IRF-7 and CXCL10 by CpG DNA, whose gene expressions have been reported to require the activation of ISRE in other cells (11, 12, 13, 28) and the type I IFN signaling in mouse DC (49), was dependent on NF-κB, whereas the contribution of NF-κB was only partial when these gene expressions (IRF-7 and CXCL10) were induced by IFN-α (Fig. 5⇑D). It is not clear at present whether the signal transduction pathway for IRF-7/CXCL10 induction differ depending on the stimuli. HSV and LPS were demonstrated, quite recently, to up-regulate IRF-7 expression in a manner dependent on NF-κB in human pDC (31). NF-κB-dependent pathway would be important for human pDC in promptly inducing IFN-α-inducible genes without a preceding activation of IFN-αβ receptor.
p38 MAPK regulates NF-κB-dependent gene expression by modifying the activation process, the transcriptional function, and/or the recruitment of NF-κB, in various cells (50, 51, 52). The reverse pathway has been recently reported with respect to the expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in Candida albicans-infected monocytes (53). In CpG DNA-stimulated pDC, NF-κB and p38 MAPK appeared to collaborate with each other (Fig. 6⇑). As depicted in Fig. 4⇑, the IC50 of SB203580 in CpG DNA-stimulated pDC was ∼10-fold higher than that in LPS-stimulated monocytes (our personal observation with TNF-α production). The activity of JNK or protein kinase B kinase was reported to be inhibited at higher concentrations of SB203580 in other types of cells (54, 55). These observations might suggest the involvement of other molecule(s) in CpG DNA-activation of pDC. Further examinations are needed. Comparing the NF-κB and p38 MAPK pathways, however, the degree of inhibition by SB203580 varied among the cytokines, while the NF-κB inhibitors revealed the same efficacy to all the IFN-α/CXCL10/CCL3 production. The activation of NF-κB may compensate the function of p38 MAPK, and this may also explain the reason, in part, as to why the high concentration of SB203580 is required for the inhibition of cytokine production in CpG DNA-stimulated pDC. We have previously demonstrated that p38 MAPK pathway is involved in CpG DNA, but not type I IFN, -induced STAT1 phosphorylation in pDC (14). We provide no direct evidence showing that CpG DNA-activated STAT1 participates in IFN-α/chemokine expression. Nevertheless, considering that STAT1 phosphorylation was also inhibited by a NF-κB inhibitor (Fig. 6⇑B), the NF-κB pathway is strongly suggested to form a stem route even for the expression of the genes, which require the ISRE to be activated, such as IRF-7 and CXCL10, in CpG DNA-stimulated pDC. The collaborative action of NF-κB and p38 MAPK may facilitate the up-regulation of these gene expressions.
The third finding is the pathway through which IRF-7 is activated and consequently IFN-α is expressed. We propose that, from the results shown in Fig. 8⇑, the signaling event upstream of NF-κB/p38 MAPK activation, most likely in chloroquine-sensitive machinery, is important for the activation of IRF-7. There are some circumstantial pieces of evidence showing, in mice or cell lines, that 1) IRF-7 is a dominant transcription factor necessary for IFN-α gene expression (56, 57), 2) an association of IRF-7 with MyD88 and TRAF6 in the endosomal compartment is a prerequisite for the activation of the IFN promoter (18, 19), and 3) the kinase activity of IL-1 receptor-associated kinase-1 is necessary for transcriptional activation of IRF-7 independently of the activation of NF-κB and MAPK (42). In CpG DNA-stimulated human pDC, IRF-7 moved to the nuclei in a manner independent of NF-κB/p38 MAPK (Fig. 8⇑). Therefore, also in human pDC, IRF-7 would be activated probably through the formation of a complex with MyD88/TRAF6 in the endosomal vesicles, leading to the transcription of IFN-α gene. To what extent constitutive IRF-7 and CpG DNA-induced IRF-7 contributes to the expression of IFN-α remains uncertain, because the working design shown in Fig. 8⇑ does not show a comparison of their levels. However, the data showing that CHX did not prevent the CpG DNA induction of IRF-7 (Fig. 7⇑C), and that CpG DNA, but not type I IFN, -up-regulation of IRF-7 was completely blocked by NF-κB inhibitors as was that of IFN-α (Fig. 5⇑, C and D), suggest that NF-κB-dependent and newly expressed IRF-7 largely contributes to the expression of IFN-α in CpG DNA-stimulated human pDC.
Recently, Honda et al. (47) demonstrated that a long retention of type I IFN-inducing type of CpG DNA within endosomal vesicles in pDC causes a spatiotemporal regulation of TLR9-MyD88-IRF-7 signaling pathway, and this achieves robust production of type I IFN in the mouse. Regarding their findings, the expression of IFN-α can be augmented through the autocrine response. Indeed, culturing with IFN-α induced IRF-7 expression (Figs. 2⇑A and 5⇑D), and neutralization of IFN-αβ receptor decreased IFN-α production (Fig. 2⇑B). However, this cascade was mostly conducted in a NF-κB-independent way (Fig. 5⇑D). IFN-α has been reported to suppress activation of NF-κB (58). It remains to be elucidated how the NF-κB-dependent and -independent pathways coexist in pDC in relation to the gene induction by CpG DNA.
TLR9 is expressed in endoplasmic reticulum and recognize CpG DNA in endosomes. However, the process by which CpG DNA enter into the cells is still unclear. In a separate set of experiments, we detected SR-A in fresh pDC (positively isolated as BDCA4+ cells). In conjunction with the SR-A ligand-inhibition of cytokine induction by CpG DNA (Fig. 3⇑), it is suggested that the SR-A contributes to the responsiveness of pDC to CpG DNA. We hypothesize an overall cascade that is involved in the CpG DNA induction of IFN-α, CXCL10, and CCL3 in Fig. 9⇓.
Proposed pathways which lead to the expression of IFN-α, CXCL10, and CCL3 following stimulation of human pDC with CpG DNA. The signaling pathway depicted is based on the finding of the current and previous studies (14 ). ①, Human pDC express constitutively activated NF-κB (NF-κB(c)), which would be involved in the constitutive expression of IRF-7 (IRF-7(c)) and CCL3 (CCL3(c)). ②, When pDC are exposed to a bacterial component CpG DNA, NF-κB (NF-κB(CpG)) and p38 MAPK are activated through the TLR9 signaling pathway, leading to the de novo expression of IRF-7, CXCL10, and CCL3. ③, The signal(s) generated upstream of NF-κB/p38 MAPK activation is involved in the expression of IFN-α, most likely through the activation of IRF-7(c) and/or newly expressed IRF-7(new), in chloroquine-sensitive machinery. ④, The IFN-α, once secreted, returns to pDC via the IFN-αβ receptor and also participates in inducing the expression of IRF-7 gene through the classical type-I IFN signaling pathway. How TLR9 signaling and the IFN signaling pathway affect each other in response to CpG DNA/type I IFN still remains to be clarified.
CpG DNA has a promising potential for therapeutic use, but the action of CpG DNA in pDC differs depending on the sequence (6, 15, 28, 59). The profiles of cytokine/chemokine production by palGACGA1010 are similar to those by number 2216 (prototype CpG-A), and the mechanism demonstrated for palGACGA1010, therefore, would have similarities with that of the IFN-α-inducing type of CpG-A. A large number of microbes and microbial products trigger the production of type I IFN in vivo and in vitro (10). From the current study, pDC appear to represent a key cell type that efficiently detects invading pathogens and translates them into signals, which can be linked by innate and adaptive immunity. The rational manipulation of the NF-κB-dependent and NF-κB-independent pathway may improve the efficacy of pDC/CpG DNA- or IFN-treatment of various diseases.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Harukazu Kitagawa for the data base analysis of the bacterial genome, Dr. Takashi Yokochi for critical reading and discussion of manuscript, and Chino Kobayashi for secretarial and technical help with this study.
Disclosures
The authors have no financial conflict of interest.
Footnotes
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
↵1 This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (13670266, 16590355, and 17390458) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and for young scientists (17791165) from Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; Research on Allergic Disease and Immunology of Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (17220101); Research on Health Sciences focusing on Drug Innovation (International Collaborative Research Project SH54212 and SH54411) from the Japan Health Science Foundation; and Smoking Research Foundation.
↵2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Sumiko Iho, Department of Pathological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Fukui, 23-3 Matsuoka-Shimoaizuki, Eiheiji-cho, Yoshida-gun, Fukui 910-1193, Japan. E-mail address: ihosumik{at}fmsrsa.fukui-med.ac.jp
↵3 Abbreviations used in this paper: DC, dendritic cell; pDC, plasmacytoid DC; ISRE, IFN-stimulated response element; IRF, IFN regulatory factor; TRAF6, TNF receptor-associated factor 6; ODN, oligonucleotide; Act D, actinomycin D; CHX, cycloheximide; PDTC, pyrrolidinedithiocarbamate; CAPE, caffeic acid phenethyl ester; DEX, dexamethasone; PMX, polymixin B; BDCA, blood DC Ag; SR, scavenger receptor.
- Received September 26, 2005.
- Accepted July 11, 2006.
- Copyright © 2006 by The American Association of Immunologists