Mechanisms of Immunopathology in Murine Models of Central Nervous System Demyelinating Disease

Anne M. Ercolini and Stephen D. Miller
J Immunol March 15, 2006, 176 (6) 3293-3298; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.176.6.3293

Abstract

Many disorders of the CNS, such as multiple sclerosis (MS), are characterized by the loss of the myelin sheath surrounding nerve axons. MS is associated with infiltration of inflammatory cells into the brain and spinal cord, which may be the primary cause of demyelination or which may be induced secondary to axonal damage. Both the innate and adaptive arms of the immune system have been reported to play important roles in myelin destruction. Numerous murine demyelinating models, both virus-induced and/or autoimmune, are available, which reflect the clinical and pathological variability seen in human disease. This review will discuss the immunopathologic mechanisms involved in these demyelinating disease models.

The axons of many vertebrate neurons are surrounded by a myelin sheath, which increases the speed at which the axon can conduct electrical impulses. Numerous inflammatory and metabolic disorders of the nervous system result in loss of the myelin sheath, with symptoms ranging from speech and visual disturbances to paralysis. Many of these disorders are associated with immune infiltrates into the nervous system, normally considered to be an immunologically privileged site. These inflammatory infiltrates may be the primary cause of the demyelination; alternatively, infiltrates may amass at sites of prior injury and contribute to progressive tissue damage. Multiple sclerosis (MS)3 is the most prevalent human demyelinating disease of the CNS (1). The loss of myelin in MS is thought to be autoimmune in nature because it is associated with elevated levels of CD4+ T cells specific for the major myelin proteins (2, 3, 4), as well as with the presence of myelin-specific Abs (5, 6).

Genetic and environmental factors (particularly exposure to virus or bacterial infections) are postulated to interact to varying degrees depending on disease type to initiate autoimmune demyelination. The many described murine models of CNS demyelination reflect the diversity of clinical manifestations in humans. Although none are exact replicates of the human disease, they share many similarities and have provided insight into the pathobiology of the human diseases they model.

Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE)

EAE is a frequently studied autoimmune model of MS. EAE is induced in mice by active priming with whole myelin proteins or specific myelin peptide epitopes in adjuvant; the specific myelin epitopes able to induce EAE varies with the strain of mouse used. Demyelination and paralytic episodes are associated with infiltration of myelin-specific inflammatory Th1 CD4+ T cells into the CNS (7). EAE can also be induced by adoptive transfer of myelin-specific CD4+ T cells, confirming the importance of T cells in disease induction (8). The symptoms of EAE in mice are varied and mimic different clinical manifestations seen in human MS (9). Disease can be monophasic, involving an acute paralytic episode followed by complete recovery; relapsing-remitting, which involves multiple cycles of attack interspersed by full or partial recovery; or chronic, where disease symptoms of the initial attack either stabilize at peak levels or gradually worsen over time. In the monophasic and relapse-remitting forms, recovery from disease is associated with clearance of inflammatory infiltrates from the CNS. Susceptibility to either the monophasic or relapse-remitting subtypes has been mapped to distinct genetic loci (10). Similarly, studies suggest that these two MS disease subtypes are genetically distinct entities (11, 12).

A primary hallmark of the relapsing-remitting and chronic subtypes of EAE is the phenomenon of epitope spreading, which is the diversification of the initial immune response, secondary to acute myelin destruction, to include reactivity to endogenous CNS determinants (13). In EAE, spreading can occur to different epitopes within the same myelin protein used to initiate the disease (intramolecular spreading) or to epitopes within a different myelin protein (intermolecular spreading). For example, there is a sequential and hierarchical order of epitope spreading seen in the relapse-remitting disease of SJL mice primed with PLP139–151 (myelin proteolipid protein) (14). The first relapse is associated with Th1-type CD4+ T cell reactivity to PLP178–191 and the second to MBP84–104 (myelin basic protein). Myelin destruction during the acute disease episode creates an inflammatory environment, leading to the infiltration of peripheral myeloid dendritic cells (DCs) to the CNS, which locally present endogenously acquired myelin epitopes to naive T cells (15). In both SJL and (SWR × SJL)F1 EAE models, tolerance to the primary spread epitope after induction of EAE prevented relapses and/or disease progression (16, 17). However, using a mouse transgenic for a single myelin-specific TCRs, Jones et al. (18) showed that disease relapses could occur in the absence of reactivity to spread epitopes. Epitope spreading has been shown in mice double transgenic for human TCR and MHC class II molecules associated with susceptibility to MS (19, 20). The ability to clearly assess the role of epitope spreading in MS is hampered somewhat by the heterogeneity of the disease and time it takes for disease progression in humans. A recent study showed that patients with long-term disease recognized more myelin epitopes than those with recent-onset disease, but there was no certain correlation between number of epitopes recognized and disease severity (21). This supports previous studies demonstrating epitope spreading in MS patients (22, 23).

Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis virus (TMEV)-induced demyelinating disease

TMEV is a natural mouse pathogen than can cause CNS demyelination in susceptible mouse strains. TMEV is an appealing model to study the potential role of pathogenic agents in the development of MS. Numerous epidemiological studies have shown a link between the environment and MS development (24, 25, 26), and MS relapses are often preceded by infections (27, 28). Although most reports linking infection with MS are circumstantial, efforts are ongoing to identify specific pathogens that may be important in disease development. In one study, Ags derived from human herpesvirus type 6 were found in MS plaques but not in tissues from patients with other neurological conditions (29). In another, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from MS patients was reported to show a marked increase in levels of the intracellular bacteria Chlamydia pneumoniae as compared with CSF from patients with other neurological diseases (30). The significance of these observations to MS initiation remain to be determined.

There are two subgroups of TMEV. One subgroup causes an acute and often fatal encephalitis, and the other causes and initial acute gray matter disease followed by a chronic progressive demyelination in the white matter of the spinal chord known as TMEV-induced demyelinating disease (TMEV-IDD) (31, 32, 33). The latter subgroup (Thieler’s Original) is made up of TMEV-Daniel’s strain and TMEV-BeAn; although the induced disease is slightly different depending on which strain is used, they key characteristics remain the same. Intracerebral (i.c.) injection of virus leads to persistent CNS infection in susceptible mouse strains. Although the level of infectious virus is low during the chronic phase, abundant amounts of viral RNA and viral Ag can be detected throughout the lifetime of the mouse (34, 35, 36). Importantly, TMEV-IDD is characterized by immune infiltration into the CNS that is responsible for the demyelination and resulting clinical symptoms (abnormal gait and spastic hindlimb paralysis). The immune response is initiated by the presentation of persistent viral Ags by CNS-resident APCs to Th1-type CD4+ T cells (37). Proinflammatory cytokines released by these T cells recruit monocytes and macrophages into the CNS, which cause damage to myelin. This subsequent release of myelin Ags and uptake by APCs lead to the emergence of myelin-specific CD4+ T cells. Initial studies showed that immune responses to TMEV were detectible 5–7 days postinfection but that reactivity to myelin did not appear until after the onset of clinical symptoms (30–35 days postinfection) (15, 38, 39, 40). Thus, the chronic phase of TMEV-IDD is autoimmune caused by epitope spreading from viral determinants to self-myelin determinants. Tolerance to multiple myelin proteins after virus infection significantly inhibits TMEV-IDD, which demonstrates the importance of the myelin-specific immune response in disease progression (41). In SJL mice, reactivity appears to multiple myelin epitopes starting with the immunodominant epitope PLP139–151 and spreading at later time points to other subdominant myelin determinants in a hierarchical manner similar to what is seen in EAE (15, 37, 42).

Recombinant TMEV model of molecular mimicry-induced demyelination

Among the ways in which a virus may trigger autoimmune reactions, molecular mimicry is the mechanism most often proposed. Molecular mimicry involves immunological cross-reactivity between self-epitopes and epitopes from a foreign pathogen. Activated MBP-specific T cells have been found in MS patients (43, 44, 45); the subsequent identification of pathogen-derived mimics capable of activating human MBP-specific T cell lines reinforces the theory that pathogens may induce MS via molecular mimicry (46, 47). Pathogen-derived mimics capable of cross-activating murine MBP-specific T cells have also been identified, including several mimics capable of inducing EAE in mice transgenic for an MBP-specific TCR (48, 49).

In the first attempt to create a murine model of infection-induced CNS disease via mimicry, vaccinia virus was engineered to express rat PLP (VVplp) (50). Although disease could not be directly induced by infection with this recombinant virus, VVplp-infected mice later challenged with encephalitogenic myelin peptides had enhanced EAE-type disease as compared with mice infected with control vaccinia virus. Later, we infected SJL mice with rTMEV engineered to express the immunodominant SJL myelin epitope PLP139–151 (PLP-TMEV) (51). Mice infected with this virus developed a demyelinating disease that was early onset (7–10 days postinfection) as compared with wild-type TMEV (30–40 days). This early onset was associated with inflammatory PLP13–151-specific CD4+ T cell responses that arose concomitantly with responses to the virus epitopes around day 7–14 postinfection. Hence, in contrast to wild-type TMEV, where disease is the result of epitope spreading from virus to myelin Ags, disease in the rTMEV is a result of initial priming of myelin-specific T cells. Another rTMEV was constructed using a previously identified mimic epitope of PLP139–151 derived from the bacteria Haemophilus influenzae (HI-TMEV) (52, 53). Mice infected with HI-TMEV also developed early-onset gait abnormality associated with early induction of PLP139–151-specific CD4+ T cell responses, and the disease could be inhibited by prior induction of tolerance to either the HI mimic epitope or the self PLP139–151 epitope. Significantly, infection with this mimic-expressing virus was able to induce disease, whereas priming with the mimic epitope in adjuvant could not (52, 53). This suggests that innate immune signals provided by the virus are important for disease induction. Subsequent studies showed that the relatively mild disease induced by infection with HI-TMEV could be exacerbated by giving mice a second dose of virus 2 wk following initial infection (54); the increase in clinical symptoms was associated with increases immune infiltrates into the CNS. This supports the hypothesis that while a single infection may not be sufficient to precipitate autoimmune demyelination, several infections over a person’s lifespan may eventually lead to disease.

Murine hepatitis virus (MHV)

MHV, like TMEV, is an infection-induced murine model of inflammatory CNS demyelination (55). In this model, mice are inoculated i.c. or intranasally with the neurotropic strains, JHMV or MHV-A59. CNS infection results in an influx of immune cells that for the most part will clear the virus, although the virus does persist in low amounts (56). In contrast to TMEV, susceptible mice infected with MHV have a single major symptomatic episode (ataxia, hindlimb paresis, paralysis) from which the majority will recover (57). Demyelination begins about 1 wk postinfection and peaks at week 3, after which lesion repair and remyelination occurs, although new areas of demyelination can occur throughout the lifetime of the mouse (58, 59, 60).

The exact mechanism of demyelination is somewhat controversial, but there is extensive evidence suggesting that immune responses are critical to this process. MHV infects and replicates within oligodendrocytes, the myelin-synthesizing cells of the CNS (61, 62), and it can be argued that oligodendrocyte damage or death is the major mechanism of demyelination (63, 64). However, mice exposed to immunosuppressive doses of irradiation following JHM strain of mouse hepatitis virus infection showed little demyelination despite the presence of virus in oligodendrocytes and reconstituting irradiated mice with splenocytes from unirradiated-infected mice restored demyelination (65). Similarly, T and B cell-deficient RAG1-deficient mice, which were resistant to demyelination, developed histological disease after adoptive transfer with splenocytes from MHV-inoculated mice, which involved the recruitment of activated macrophages/microglia to sites of demyelination in the spinal cord (66). Chemokine receptor knockout mice (CCR5−/−) showed reduced demyelination that correlated with reduced macrophage but not T cell infiltration into the CNS (67). Taken together, these studies suggest that macrophages are primarily responsible for myelin destruction but that T cells are required to recruit macrophages into the CNS. Other studies indicate that the presence of either CD8+ or CD4+ T cells, but not both subsets at the same time, is required for demyelination. Both β2-microglobulin- and MHC class II (I-Ab)-deficient mice display demyelination after MHV infection (68, 69, 70). However, in two reports, CD4-deficient mice showed less severe disease than CD8-deficient mice, which again correlated with recruitment of macrophages to the CNS (71, 72). There is no evidence of self-specific immunity in the CNS of MHV-infected mice (73). Therefore, the primary mechanism of demyelination in murine MHV infection appears to be bystander myelin destruction by the immune response initially recruited to the CNS to control viral infection. The implication of this model to human disease is that a pathogen may cause demyelination in an Ag-nonspecific manner if it is tropic for cells within the nervous system.

Semliki Forest virus (SFV)

SFV is a neuroinvasive and neurotropic virus that infects CNS neurons and oligodendrocytes (74, 75). In adult C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice, the virus is for the most part cleared from the CNS by day 6 postinfection. This is followed by demyelination that peaks around day 14 and then wanes, with sporadic and mild clinical symptoms (76, 77). SFV is thus an attractive model of “monosymptomatic” MS, where patients experience a single clinical episode (78).

The demyelination in SFV-infected mice is T cell mediated because demyelination is not seen in nude or SCID mice (76, 79). In BALB/c mice, depletion of CD8+, but not CD4+, T cells virtually abolished demyelinating lesions (80). This may suggest that T cell lysis rather than cytokine secretion is responsible for CNS pathology. Other studies in this model have shown that Th1-type cytokines are involved in viral clearance but not demyelination (81, 82). Although not definitively proven, it is thought that demyelination is due to cytolytic damage of virus-infected oligodendrocytes. Morphological changes were shown in optical nerve oligodendrocytes at peak of disease in BALB/c mice (83). In C57BL/6 mice, molecular mimicry may also play a role in demyelination. Infected mice have proliferative T cell responses to MBP (84), and Abs reactive to MBP and myelin oligodendrocyte protein (MOG) (85). Computer algorithms have uncovered homology between an epitope in the SFV surface protein E2 and MOG18–32 (86). Mice primed with either the E2 or MOG peptide develop an EAE-like disease whose histopathology resembles that of mice infected with SFV. It was concluded that the demyelinating lesions were due mainly to Ab responses, which were cross-reactive between MOG and the SFV E2 protein.

Sindbis Virus (SV)

Although not extensively studied as a model of demyelination, SV infection of mice provides further proof-of-principle that pathogen infection can lead to autoimmune disease. The AR339 strain replicates primarily in neurons of the brain and spinal cord, and infection is rapidly controlled by the immune response, with infectious virus becoming undetectable 7–8 days postinfection (87). In contrast to BALB/c mice, which normally remain asymptomatic following infection, SJL mice develop EAE-like paralysis starting at day 6 and continuing up to 8 wk postinfection (88). Cyclophosphamide treatment ameliorates symptoms despite increasing CNS viral titers, indicating that the paralysis induced in SJL mice is due to the immune response. CNS lymphocytes taken day 7 postinfection were specific for SV but not for MBP (89). However, MBP-specific T cells and Ab responses were detected in the periphery at 8 wk postinfection, indicating that as in TMEV-IDD, anti-myelin responses may arise due to bystander damage via epitope spreading (88). The fact that symptoms occur rapidly following SV infection indicates that, unlike TMEV-IDD, demyelination is not the primary cause of paralysis but may contribute to chronic disease. CNS inflammation resolves by 2 wk postinfection in BALB/c mice but persists for a longer period of time and is more severe in SJL mice (88, 89). CNS lymphocytes isolated from SJL mice appear to be less prone to apoptosis and local mechanisms of regulation than those from BALB/c mice (90). Comparison of CNS lymphocytes from both strains of mice showed that SJL mice had a higher percentage of CD4+ T cells during chronic infection, fewer NK cells, higher expression of IL-10, and lower expression of IL-4 (89). The significance of this differential profile to disease progression remains to be determined, as does the true contribution of the anti-myelin response.

Conclusion

As outlined in Fig. 1⇓, there are multiple pathways by which immune-mediated demyelination can occur in humans. Each of the murine models discussed above is different with respect to the underlying mechanisms thought to be responsible for myelin destruction. Moreover, the different clinical manifestations of each model reflect the spectrum of symptoms experienced by patients. Although no individual system precisely models the pathology and clinical course of human CNS disease, as a whole, these models have led to significant advances in understanding disease mechanisms and for designing novel therapies.

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.

Cells of the immune system potentially involved in demyelination. APCs can take up Ag from a foreign source (such as an invading pathogen) or from self-tissue (myelin or oligodendrocyte proteins) (no. 1). Ag is processed into peptides, which are loaded onto MHCs and presented to T cells via the TCR (no. 2). Activated cytolytic T cells (Tc, activated by MHC class I on APCs) cause damage by direct lysis of the target (no. 3). Th cells (activated by MHC class II) release inflammatory cytokines that are directly damaging to tissue and also activate monocytes/macrophages (Mφ) (no. 4). T cells may be specific for self-tissue (direct damage), specific for a tissue-resident pathogen (bystander damage), or cross-reactive with pathogen and self-epitopes (molecular mimicry). Surface Ag (foreign or self) is recognized by B cells via the BCR (no. 5). Upon receiving T cell help (no. 6), the B cell secretes Abs specific for self or dual specific for foreign and self-epitopes (molecular mimicry) (no. 7). The binding of Ab to tissue may interfere with biological function (no. 8). Abs can also simultaneously bind to and activate Mφ via its FcR (Fc), which mediate tissue damage (no. 9). Damaged tissue releases self-Ag, including new Ags not involved in the initial activation (no. 10), which are taken up by APCs (epitope spread) (no. 11). This further propagates the self-reactive immune response and leads to additional tissue damage.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge discussion with colleagues at the Myelin Repair Foundation.

Footnotes

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • ↵1 This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants NS026543, NS030871, NS023349, NS040460, and NS048411; National Multiple Sclerosis Society Research Grant RG-3489-A-6-2; and Myelin Repair Foundation Grant SM MRF-02. A.M.E. is supported by NMSS Postdoctoral Fellowship Grant FG-1596-A-1.

  • ↵2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Stephen D. Miller, Department of Microbiology-Immunology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 303 East Chicago Avenue, Chicago, IL 60611. E-mail address: s-d-miller{at}northwestern.edu

  • ↵3 Abbreviations used in this paper: MS, multiple sclerosis; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; DC, dendritic cell; EAE, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis; HI-TMEV, Haemophilus influenzae-TMEV; i.c., intracerebral; MBP, myelin basic protein; MHV, murine hepatitis virus; MOG, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein; PLP, proteolipid protein; PLP, proteolipid protein; SFV, Semliki Forest virus; SV, Sindbis virus; TMEV, Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis virus; TMEV-IDD, TMEV-induced demyelinating disease.

  • Received November 28, 2005.
  • Accepted December 13, 2005.

References

  1. ↵
    Steinman, L.. 1996. Multiple sclerosis: a coordinated immunological attack against myelin in the central nervous system. Cell 85: 299-302.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Sun, J. B., T. Olsson, W. Z. Wang, B. G. Xiao, V. Kostulas, S. Fredrikson, H. P. Ekre, H. Link. 1991. Autoreactive T and B cells responding to myelin proteolipid protein in multiple sclerosis and controls. Eur. J. Immunol. 21: 1461-1468.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Ota, K., M. Matsui, E. L. Milford, G. A. Mackin, H. L. Weiner, D. A. Hafler. 1990. T cell recognition of an immunodominant myelin basic protein epitope in multiple sclerosis. Nature 346: 183-187.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Bernard, C. C., N. K. de Rosbo. 1991. Immunopathological recognition of autoantigens in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol. 13: 171-178.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    Gerritse, K., C. Deen, M. Fasbender, R. Ravid, W. Boersma, E. Claassen. 1994. The involvement of specific anti myelin basic protein antibody- forming cells in multiple sclerosis immunopathology. J. Neuroimmunol. 49: 153-159.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Genain, C. P., B. Cannella, S. L. Hauser, C. S. Raine. 1999. Identification of autoantibodies associated with myelin damage in multiple sclerosis. Nat. Med. 5: 170-175.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Dal Canto, M. C., R. W. Melvold, B. S. Kim, S. D. Miller. 1995. Two models of multiple sclerosis: experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE) and Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis virus (TMEV) infection—a pathological and immunological comparison. Microsc. Res. Tech. 32: 215-229.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    McRae, B. L., M. K. Kennedy, L. J. Tan, M. C. Dal Canto, S. D. Miller. 1992. Induction of active and adoptive chronic-relapsing experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) using an encephalitogenic epitope of proteolipid protein. J. Neuroimmunol. 38: 229-240.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Vanderlugt, C. L., S. D. Miller. 2002. Epitope spreading in immune-mediated diseases: implications for immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2: 85-95.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Butterfield, R. J., E. P. Blankenhorn, R. J. Roper, J. F. Zachary, R. W. Doerge, J. Sudweeks, J. Rose, C. Teuscher. 1999. Genetic analysis of disease subtypes and sexual dimorphisms in mouse experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE): relapsing/remitting and monophasic remitting/nonrelapsing EAE are immunogenetically distinct. J. Immunol. 162: 3096-3102.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Kira, J., T. Kanai, Y. Nishimura, K. Yamasaki, S. Matsushita, Y. Kawano, K. Hasuo, S. Tobimatsu, T. Kobayashi. 1996. Western versus Asian types of multiple sclerosis: immunogenetically and clinically distinct disorders. Ann. Neurol. 40: 569-574.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Olerup, O., J. Hillert, S. Fredrikson, T. Olsson, S. Kam-Hansen, E. Mı̂ller, B. Carlsson, J. Wallin. 1989. Primarily chronic progressive and relapsing/remitting multiple sclerosis: two immunogenetically distinct disease entities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86: 7113-7117.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Lehmann, P. V., E. E. Sercarz, T. Forsthuber, C. M. Dayan, G. Gammon. 1993. Determinant spreading and the dynamics of the autoimmune T cell repertoire. Immunol. Today 14: 203-208.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    McRae, B. L., C. L. Vanderlugt, M. C. Dal Canto, S. D. Miller. 1995. Functional evidence for epitope spreading in the relapsing pathology of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Exp. Med. 182: 75-85.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    McMahon, E. J., S. L. Bailey, C. V. Castenada, H. Waldner, S. D. Miller. 2005. Epitope spreading initiates in the CNS in two mouse models of multiple sclerosis. Nat. Med. 11: 335-339.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Vanderlugt, C. L., T. N. Eagar, K. L. Neville, K. M. Nikcevich, J. A. Bluestone, S. D. Miller. 2000. Pathologic role and temporal appearance of newly emerging autoepitopes in relapsing experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Immunol. 164: 670-678.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Yu, M., J. M. Johnson, V. K. Tuohy. 1996. A predictable sequential determinant spreading cascade invariably accompanies progression of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis: a basis for peptide-specific therapy after onset of clinical disease. J. Exp. Med. 183: 1777-1788.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Jones, R. E., D. Bourdette, N. Moes, A. Vandenbark, A. Zamora, H. Offner. 2003. Epitope spreading is not required for relapses in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Immunol. 170: 1690-1698.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Ellmerich, S., K. Takacs, M. Mycko, H. Waldner, F. Wahid, R. J. Boyton, P. A. Smith, S. Amor, D. Baker, D. A. Hafler, et al 2004. Disease-related epitope spread in a humanized T cell receptor transgenic model of multiple sclerosis. Eur. J. Immunol. 34: 1839-1848.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Klehmet, J., C. Shive, R. Guardia-Wolff, I. Petersen, E. G. Spack, B. O. Boehm, R. Weissert, T. G. Forsthuber. 2004. T cell epitope spreading to myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein in HLA-DR4 transgenic mice during experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Clin. Immunol. 111: 53-60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Davies, S., T. Nicholson, M. Laura, G. Giovannoni, D. M. Altmann. 2005. Spread of T lymphocyte immune responses to myelin epitopes with duration of multiple sclerosis. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 64: 371-377.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    Goebels, N., H. Hofstetter, S. Schmidt, C. Brunner, H. Wekerle, R. Hohlfeld. 2000. Repertoire dynamics of autoreactive T cells in multiple sclerosis patients and healthy subjects: epitope spreading versus clonal persistence. Brain 123: 508-518.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    Muraro, P. A., K. P. Wandinger, B. Bielekova, B. Gran, A. Marques, U. Utz, H. F. McFarland, S. Jacobson, R. Martin. 2003. Molecular tracking of antigen-specific T cell clones in neurological immune-mediated disorders. Brain 126: 20-31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Kurtzke, J. F.. 1993. Epidemiologic evidence for multiple sclerosis as an infection. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 6: 382-427.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Kurtzke, J. F.. 2000. Multiple sclerosis in time and space—geographic clues to cause. J. Neurovirol. 6: (Suppl. 2):S134-S140.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    Kurtzke, J. F., C. S. Raine, H. F. McFarlin, W. W. Tourtellotte. 1997. The epidemiology of multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis: Clinical and Pathogenetic Basis 91-139. Chapman and Hall, London.
  27. ↵
    Edwards, S., M. Zvartau, H. Clarke, W. Irving, L. D. Blumhardt. 1998. Clinical relapses and disease activity on magnetic resonance imaging associated with viral upper respiratory tract infections in multiple sclerosis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 64: 736-741.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Andersen, O., P. E. Lygner, T. Bergstrom, M. Andersson, A. Vahlne. 1993. Viral infections trigger multiple sclerosis relapses: a prospective seroepidemiological study. J. Neurol. 240: 417-422.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Challoner, P. B., K. T. Smith, J. D. Parker, D. L. MacLeod, S. N. Coulter, T. M. Rose, E. R. Shultz, J. L. Bennett, R. L. Garber, M. Chang, et al 1995. Plaque-associated expression of human herpesvirus 6 in multiple sclerosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 7440-7444.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    Sriram, S., C. W. Stratton, S. Yao, A. Tharp, L. Ding, J. D. Bannan, W. M. Mitchell. 1999. Chlamydia pneumoniae infection of the central nervous system in multiple sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 46: 6-14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    Oleszak, E. L., J. R. Chang, H. Friedman, C. D. Katsetos, C. D. Platsoucas. 2004. Theiler’s virus infection: a model for multiple sclerosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 17: 174-207.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    Kim, B. S., J. P. Palna. 1999. Immune mechanisms of Theiler’s virus-induced demyelination. Exp. Mol. Med. 31: 115-121.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    Olson, J. K., J. L. Croxford, S. D. Miller. 2001. Virus-induced autoimmunity: potential role of viruses in initiation, perpetuation, and progression of T cell-mediated autoimmune diseases. Viral Immunol. 14: 227-250.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    Dal Canto, M. C., H. L. Lipton. 1982. Ultrastructural immunohistochemical localization of virus in acute and chronic demyelinating Theiler’s virus infection. Am. J. Pathol. 106: 20-29.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  35. ↵
    Lipton, H. L., G. Twaddle, M. L. Jelachich. 1995. The predominant virus antigen burden is present in macrophages in Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis virus-induced demyelinating disease. J. Virol. 69: 2525-2533.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    Trottier, M., P. Kallio, W. Wang, H. L. Lipton. 2001. High numbers of viral RNA copies in the central nervous system of mice during persistent infection with Theiler’s virus. J. Virol. 75: 7420-7428.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    Miller, S. D., C. L. Vanderlugt, W. S. Begolka, W. Pao, R. L. Yauch, K. L. Neville, Y. Katz-Levy, A. Carrizosa, B. S. Kim. 1997. Persistent infection with Theiler’s virus leads to CNS autoimmunity via epitope spreading. Nat. Med. 3: 1133-1136.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    Barbano, R. L., M. C. Dal Canto. 1984. Serum and cells from Theiler’s virus-infected mice fail to injure myelinating cultures or to produce in vivo transfer of disease: the pathogenesis of Theiler’s virus-induced demyelination appears to differ from that of EAE. J. Neurol. Sci. 66: 283-293.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    Miller, S. D., R. J. Clatch, D. C. Pevear, J. L. Trotter, H. L. Lipton. 1987. Class II-restricted T cell responses in Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis virus (TMEV)-induced demyelinating disease. I. Cross-specificity among TMEV substrains and related picornaviruses, but not myelin proteins. J. Immunol. 138: 3776-3784.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  40. ↵
    Clatch, R. J., H. L. Lipton, S. D. Miller. 1986. Characterization of Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis virus (TMEV)-specific delayed-type hypersensitivity responses in TMEV-induced demyelinating disease: correlation with clinical signs. J. Immunol. 136: 920-927.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  41. ↵
    Neville, K. L., J. Padilla, S. D. Miller. 2002. Myelin-specific tolerance attenuates the progression of a virus-induced demyelinating disease: Implications for the treatment of MS. J. Neuroimmunol. 123: 18-29.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    Katz-Levy, Y., K. L. Neville, J. Padilla, S. M. Rahbe, W. S. Begolka, A. M. Girvin, J. K. Olson, C. L. Vanderlugt, S. D. Miller. 2000. Temporal development of autoreactive Th1 responses and endogenous antigen presentation of self-myelin epitopes by CNS-resident APCs in Theiler’s virus-infected mice. J. Immunol. 165: 5304-5314.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    Allegretta, M., J. A. Nicklas, S. Sriram, R. J. Albertini. 1990. T cells responsive to myelin basic protein in patients with multiple sclerosis. Science 247: 718-721.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    Wucherpfennig, K. W., J. Zhang, C. Witek, M. Matsui, Y. Modabber, K. Ota, D. Hafler. 1994. Clonal expansion and persistence of human T cells specific for an immunodominant myelin basic protein peptide. J. Immunol. 152: 5581-5592.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  45. ↵
    Zhang, J., J. Raus. 1994. Myelin basic protein-reactive T cells in multiple sclerosis: pathologic relevance and therapeutic targeting. Cytotechnology 16: 181-187.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    Hausmann, S., M. Martin, L. Gauthier, K. W. Wucherpfennig. 1999. Structural features of autoreactive TCR that determine the degree of degeneracy in peptide recognition. J. Immunol. 162: 338-344.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    Wucherpfennig, K. W., J. L. Strominger. 1995. Molecular mimicry in T cell-mediated autoimmunity: viral peptides activate human T cell clones specific for myelin basic protein. Cell 80: 695-705.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    Grogan, J. L., A. Kramer, A. Nogai, L. Dong, M. Ohde, J. Schneider-Mergener, T. Kamradt. 1999. Cross-reactivity of myelin basic protein-specific T cells with multiple microbial peptides: experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis induction in TCR transgenic mice. J. Immunol. 163: 3764-3770.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    Ufret-Vincenty, R. L., L. Quigley, N. Tresser, S. H. Pak, A. Gado, S. Hausmann, K. W. Wucherpfennig, S. Brocke. 1998. In vivo survival of viral antigen-specific T cells that induce experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Exp. Med. 188: 1725-1738.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    Barnett, L. A., J. L. Whitton, Y. Wada, R. S. Fujinami. 1993. Enhancement of autoimmune disease using recombinant vaccinia virus encoding myelin proteolipid protein. J. Neuroimmunol. 44: 15-25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    Olson, J. K., J. L. Croxford, M. Calenoff, M. C. Dal Canto, S. D. Miller. 2001. A virus-induced molecular mimicry model of multiple sclerosis. J. Clin. Invest. 108: 311-318.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    Carrizosa, A. M., L. B. Nicholson, M. Farzan, S. Southwood, A. Sette, R. A. Sobel, V. K. Kuchroo. 1998. Expansion by self antigen is necessary for the induction of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by T cells primed with a cross-reactive environmental antigen. J. Immunol. 161: 3307-3314.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. ↵
    Croxford, J. L., H. A. Anger, S. D. Miller. 2005. Viral delivery of an epitope from Haemophilus influenzae induces central nervous system autoimmune disease by molecular mimicry. J. Immunol. 174: 907-917.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. ↵
    Croxford, J. L., J. K. Olson, H. A. Anger, S. D. Miller. 2005. Initiation and exacerbation of autoimmune demyelination of the central nervous system via virus-induced molecular mimicry: implications for the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. J. Virol. 79: 8581-8590.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. ↵
    Matthews, A. E., S. R. Weiss, Y. Paterson. 2002. Murine hepatitis virus—a model for virus-induced CNS demyelination. J. Neurovirol. 8: 76-85.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    Knobler, R. L., P. W. Lampert, M. B. Oldstone. 1982. Virus persistence and recurring demyelination produced by a temperature-sensitive mutant of MHV-4. Nature 298: 279-280.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    Lavi, E., D. H. Gilden, Z. Wroblewska, L. B. Rorke, S. R. Weiss. 1984. Experimental demyelination produced by the A59 strain of mouse hepatitis virus. Neurology 34: 597-603.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. ↵
    Wang, F. I., D. R. Hinton, W. Gilmore, M. D. Trousdale, J. O. Fleming. 1992. Sequential infection of glial cells by the murine hepatitis virus JHM strain (MHV-4) leads to a characteristic distribution of demyelination. Lab. Invest. 66: 744-754.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  59. ↵
    Takahashi, K., N. Goto, Y. Matsubara, K. Fujiwara. 1987. Postinflammatory remyelination in the spinal cord of mice infected with mouse hepatitis virus, JHM strain. Jpn. J. Exp. Med. 57: 145-151.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  60. ↵
    Erlich, S. S., J. O. Fleming, S. A. Stohlman, L. P. Weiner. 1987. Experimental neuropathology of chronic demyelination induced by a JHM virus variant (DS). Arch. Neurol. 44: 839-842.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    Powell, H. C., P. W. Lampert. 1975. Oligodendrocytes and their myelin-plasma membrane connections in JHM mouse hepatitis virus encephalomyelitis. Lab. Invest. 33: 440-445.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  62. ↵
    Lampert, P. W., J. K. Sims, A. J. Kniazeff. 1973. Mechanism of demyelination in JHM virus encephalomyelitis: electron microscopic studies. Acta Neuropathol. (Berl.) 24: 76-85.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. ↵
    van Berlo, M. F., R. Warringa, G. Wolswijk, M. Lopes-Cardozo. 1989. Vulnerability of rat and mouse brain cells to murine hepatitis virus (JHM-strain): studies in vivo and in vitro. Glia 2: 85-93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. ↵
    Barac-Latas, V., G. Suchanek, H. Breitschopf, A. Stuehler, H. Wege, H. Lassmann. 1997. Patterns of oligodendrocyte pathology in coronavirus-induced subacute demyelinating encephalomyelitis in the Lewis rat. Glia 19: 1-12.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  65. ↵
    Fleming, J. O., F. I. Wang, M. D. Trousdale, D. R. Hinton, S. A. Stohlman. 1993. Interaction of immune and central nervous systems: contribution of anti-viral Thy-1+ cells to demyelination induced by coronavirus JHM. Reg. Immunol. 5: 37-43.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  66. ↵
    Wu, G. F., S. Perlman. 1999. Macrophage infiltration, but not apoptosis, is correlated with immune-mediated demyelination following murine infection with a neurotropic coronavirus. J. Virol. 73: 8771-8780.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  67. ↵
    Glass, W. G., M. T. Liu, W. A. Kuziel, T. E. Lane. 2001. Reduced macrophage infiltration and demyelination in mice lacking the chemokine receptor CCR5 following infection with a neurotropic coronavirus. Virology 288: 8-17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. ↵
    Gombold, J. L., R. M. Sutherland, E. Lavi, Y. Paterson, S. R. Weiss. 1995. Mouse hepatitis virus A59-induced demyelination can occur in the absence of CD8+ T cells. Microb. Pathog. 18: 211-221.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. ↵
    Lavi, E., J. Das Sarma, S. R. Weiss. 1999. Cellular reservoirs for coronavirus infection of the brain in β2-microglobulin knockout mice. Pathobiology 67: 75-83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  70. ↵
    Houtman, J. J., J. O. Fleming. 1996. Dissociation of demyelination and viral clearance in congenitally immunodeficient mice infected with murine coronavirus JHM. J. Neurovirol. 2: 101-110.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  71. ↵
    Wu, G. F., A. A. Dandekar, L. Pewe, S. Perlman. 2000. CD4 and CD8 T cells have redundant but not identical roles in virus-induced demyelination. J. Immunol. 165: 2278-2286.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  72. ↵
    Lane, T. E., M. T. Liu, B. P. Chen, V. C. Asensio, R. M. Samawi, A. D. Paoletti, I. L. Campbell, S. L. Kunkel, H. S. Fox, M. J. Buchmeier. 2000. A central role for CD4+ T cells and RANTES in virus-induced central nervous system inflammation and demyelination. J. Virol. 74: 1415-1424.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  73. ↵
    Stohlman, S. A., D. R. Hinton. 2001. Viral induced demyelination. Brain Pathol. 11: 92-106.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  74. ↵
    Fazakerley, J. K., S. Pathak, M. Scallan, S. Amor, H. Dyson. 1993. Replication of the A7(74) strain of Semliki Forest virus is restricted in neurons. Virology 195: 627-637.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. ↵
    Balluz, I. M., G. M. Glasgow, H. M. Killen, M. J. Mabruk, B. J. Sheahan, G. J. Atkins. 1993. Virulent and avirulent strains of Semliki Forest virus show similar cell tropism for the murine central nervous system but differ in the severity and rate of induction of cytolytic damage. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 19: 233-239.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  76. ↵
    Amor, S., M. F. Scallan, M. M. Morris, H. Dyson, J. K. Fazakerley. 1996. Role of immune responses in protection and pathogenesis during Semliki Forest virus encephalitis. J. Gen. Virol. 77: 281-291.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  77. ↵
    Mokhtarian, F., P. Swoveland. 1987. Predisposition to EAE induction in resistant mice by prior infection with Semliki Forest virus. J. Immunol. 138: 3264-3268.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  78. ↵
    McDonald, W. I., A. Compston, G. Edan, D. Goodkin, H. P. Hartung, F. D. Lublin, H. F. McFarland, D. W. Paty, C. H. Polman, S. C. Reingold, et al 2001. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 50: 121-127.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. ↵
    Fazakerley, J. K., S. Amor, H. E. Webb. 1983. Reconstitution of Semliki forest virus infected mice, induces immune mediated pathological changes in the CNS. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 52: 115-120.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  80. ↵
    Subak-Sharpe, I., H. Dyson, J. Fazakerley. 1993. In vivo depletion of CD8+ T cells prevents lesions of demyelination in Semliki Forest virus infection. J. Virol. 67: 7629-7633.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  81. ↵
    Keogh, B., G. J. Atkins, K. H. Mills, B. J. Sheahan. 2002. Avirulent Semliki Forest virus replication and pathology in the central nervous system is enhanced in IL-12-defective and reduced in IL-4-defective mice: a role for Th1 cells in the protective immunity. J. Neuroimmunol. 125: 15-22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  82. ↵
    Keogh, B., G. J. Atkins, K. H. Mills, B. J. Sheahan. 2003. Role of interferon-γ and nitric oxide in the neuropathogenesis of avirulent Semliki Forest virus infection. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 29: 553-562.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  83. ↵
    Butt, A. M., M. G. Tutton, S. L. Kirvell, S. Amor, H. G. Jenkins. 1996. Morphology of oligodendrocytes during demyelination in optic nerves of mice infected with Semliki Forest virus. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 22: 540-547.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  84. ↵
    Mokhtarian, F., Y. Shi, P. F. Zhu, D. Grob. 1994. Immune responses, and autoimmune outcome, during virus infection of the central nervous system. Cell. Immunol. 157: 195-210.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  85. ↵
    Smith-Norowitz, T. A., R. A. Sobel, F. Mokhtarian. 2000. B cells and antibodies in the pathogenesis of myelin injury in Semliki Forest virus encephalomyelitis. Cell. Immunol. 200: 27-35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  86. ↵
    Mokhtarian, F., Z. Zhang, Y. Shi, E. Gonzales, R. A. Sobel. 1999. Molecular mimicry between a viral peptide and a myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein peptide induces autoimmune demyelinating disease in mice. J. Neuroimmunol. 95: 43-54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  87. ↵
    McFarland, H. F., D. E. Griffin, R. T. Johnson. 1972. Specificity of the inflammatory response in viral encephalitis. I. Adoptive immunization of immunosuppressed mice infected with Sindbis virus. J. Exp. Med. 136: 216-226.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  88. ↵
    Mokhtarian, F., D. Grob, D. E. Griffin. 1989. Role of the immune response in Sindbis virus-induced paralysis of SJL/J mice. J. Immunol. 143: 633-637.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  89. ↵
    Rowell, J. F., D. E. Griffin. 1999. The inflammatory response to nonfatal Sindbis virus infection of the nervous system is more severe in SJL than in BALB/c mice and is associated with low levels of IL-4 mRNA and high levels of IL-10-producing CD4+ T cells. J. Immunol. 162: 1624-1632.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  90. ↵
    Irani, D. N.. 1998. The susceptibility of mice to immune-mediated neurologic disease correlates with the degree to which their lymphocytes resist the effects of brain-derived gangliosides. J. Immunol. 161: 2746-2752.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools

Jump to section