Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Enzymatically Quiescent Heparanase Augments T Cell Interactions with VCAM-1 and Extracellular Matrix Components under Versatile Dynamic Contexts

Ilya Sotnikov, Rami Hershkoviz, Valentin Grabovsky, Neta Ilan, Liora Cahalon, Israel Vlodavsky, Ronen Alon and Ofer Lider
J Immunol May 1, 2004, 172 (9) 5185-5193; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.172.9.5185
Ilya Sotnikov
Department of Immunology, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rami Hershkoviz
The Sakler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Valentin Grabovsky
Department of Immunology, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Neta Ilan
Cancer and Vascular Biology Research Center, The Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Internal Medicine, Haifa, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Liora Cahalon
Department of Immunology, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Israel Vlodavsky
Cancer and Vascular Biology Research Center, The Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Internal Medicine, Haifa, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ronen Alon
Department of Immunology, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ofer Lider
Department of Immunology, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

During their migration into inflammatory sites, immune cells, such as T cells, secrete extracellular matrix (ECM)-degrading enzymes, such as heparanase, which, under mildly acidic conditions, degrade heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPG). We have previously shown that at pH 7.2, human placental heparanase loses its enzymatic activity, while retaining its ability to bind HSPG and promote T cell adhesion to unfractionated ECM. We now demonstrate that the 65-kDa recombinant human heparanase, which is devoid of enzymatic activity, but can still bind HSPG, captures T cells under shear flow conditions and mediates their rolling and arrest, in the absence or presence of stromal cell-derived factor 1α (SDF-1α; CXCL12), in an α4β1-VCAM-1-dependent manner. Furthermore, heparanase binds to and induces T cell adhesion to key ECM components, like fibronectin and hyaluronic acid, in β1 integrin- and CD44-specific manners, respectively, via the activation of the protein kinase C and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase intracellular signaling machineries. Although the nature of the putative T cell heparanase-binding moiety is unknown, it appears that heparanase exerts its proadhesive activity by interacting with the T cells’ surface HSPG, because pretreatment of the cells with heparinase abolished their subsequent response to heparanase. Also, heparanase augmented the SDF-1α-triggered phosphorylation of Pyk-2 and extracellular signal-regulated kinase-2 implicated in integrin functioning. Moreover, heparanase, which had no chemotactic effect on T cells on its own, augmented the SDF-1α-induced T cell chemotaxis across fibronectin. These findings add another dimension to the known versatility of heparanase as a key regulator of T cell activities during inflammation, both in the context of the vasculature and at extravascular sites.

The ability to secrete extracellular matrix (ECM)3-degrading enzymes, such as elastase, metalloproteinases, hyaluronidase, and heparanase, is a fundamental feature of tissue-infiltrating blood-borne cells, including tumor cells and leukocytes, such as T cells (1, 2, 3, 4, 5). These enzymes facilitate leukocyte migration toward inflamed loci by degrading the glycoprotein or proteoglycan components of the ECM, including heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPG), thereby clearing a path for cell migration (3, 4, 5, 6). However, in addition to their matrix-degrading and thus promigratory capacities, it is now becoming increasingly clear that these enzymes can also exert other biologically meaningful activities, which are all related to their enzymatic potential. For example, these enzymes can release membrane-bound mediators and biologically active small m.w. degradation products, and degrade, and thereby inactivate proinflammatory mediators (6, 7, 8, 9). Hence, depending on their context and substrate specificities, ECM-degrading enzymes can play pivotal roles both in the potentiation and down-regulation of inflammation.

HSPG are present in the ECM and on the surface of most nucleated cells and can bind ECM glycoproteins, such as various types of collagen (CO) and fibronectin (FN), as well as growth factors and chemokines (10). Heparanase is a heparan sulfate-specific endo-β-d-glucuronidase (1, 11). This activity of mammalian heparanase is pH dependent: heparanase is enzymatically active at acidic pH values (pH 5.8–6.8), and is enzymatically quiescent at the physiological pH of 7.2 (1, 12). This characteristic suggests an effector mechanism that restricts heparanase activity to discrete anatomical sites expressing acidic conditions, such as sites of inflammation and during tumor growth. However, using heparanase, which was extracted and purified from human placenta and its supernatants, we found that heparanase, at pH 7.2, can still bind HSPG, and, thereby promote CD4+ T cell adhesion to the intact ECM, in an as yet undefined manner (13). Also, it has been recently shown that when heparanase is expressed on the surface of nonadherent lymphoma cells (14), it regulates not only their cell migration, but also their cell spreading, cytoskeletal protein phosphorylation, and, subsequently, their adhesion to ECM in an apparently β1 integrin-dependent manner (15). Interestingly, this adhesion-promoting capacity of heparanase was found to be independent of its enzymatic activity, as a point-mutated, enzymatically inactive heparanase still promotes lymphoma cell adhesion (14, 15).

In light of this novel cell-adhesive function of heparanase and its putative central role in cell adhesion and migration, we examined whether the 65-kDa nonenzymatically active recombinant heparanase can affect human T cell adhesion to blood vessel wall and ECM components, other than HSPG, under shear flow conditions in blood capillaries and under the static conditions found in tissues. We also determined whether this molecule can regulate T cell adhesion and chemotaxis induced by the prototypic proinflammatory chemokine stromal cell-derived factor 1α (SDF-1α; CXCL12) (16). Our results indicate that the nonenzymatically active heparanase, which can capture T cells moving under shear stress conditions, can also bind ECM components, and mediate T cell adhesion to these ligands. Heparanase appears to exert its proadhesive activity, in a cell surface-expressed HSPG-dependent manner, by directly activating T cell cytoskeletal elements related to β1 integrin functioning. Moreover, heparanase regulates SDF-1α-induced T cell interactions with VCAM-1 and FN, under static and shear flow conditions. We suggest that in sites relatively remote from inflammatory foci, within blood vessels and extravascular tissues, heparanase can act as a T cell cytokine that is involved in regulating cell activation and behavior.

Materials and Methods

Reagents

The following reagents and chemicals were purchased from the sources indicated: RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies, Paisley, U.K.), FCS, HEPES buffer, antibiotics, and sodium pyruvate (Kibbutz Beit-Haemek, Israel); CO type IV (CO-IV; Sigma-Aldrich, Rehovot, Israel); FN (Chemicon International, Temecula, CA); hyaluronic acid (HA; Sigma, Rehovot, Israel); ECM-coated 96-well plates (NovaMed, Jerusalem, Israel); and recombinant 7-domain human soluble VCAM-1 (sVCAM-1), kindly provided by R. Lobb (Biogen, Cambridge, MA). Recombinant human SDF-1α and IL-2 were purchased from PeproTech Asia (Rehovot, Israel). The FN peptides RGDS (Arg-Gly-Asp-Ser), RGES (Arg-Gly-Glu-Ser), and LDV (Leu-Asp-Val) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. mAbs directed against human β1 integrins (CD29, clone 3SS) and against CD44 were obtained from Serotec (Oxford, U.K.). Function-blocking anti-VLA4 integrin mAb HP1/2 was the kind gift of T. Kishimoto (Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Ridgefield, CT). Polyclonal Abs against phosphorylated Pyk-2 (py881) were obtained from BioSource International (Camarillo, CA); anti-total Pyk-2 (clone N-19) and mAbs against c-myc (clone 9E10) were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA), and against phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase-2 (ERK-2) were from BioSource International; and anti-ERK-2 polyclonal Ab was from Sigma-Aldrich.

Recombinant human heparanase

HEK 293 cells, stably transfected with the human heparanase gene construct in the mammalian pSecTag vector (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA), were kindly provided by ImClone (New York, NY). This plasmid vector provides the IgG signal peptide needed to ensure efficient protein secretion, together with Myc and His tags at the protein C terminus to enable easy detection and purification. The cells were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS, glutamine, sodium pyruvate, and antibiotics. For the purification of the Myc-tagged 65-kDa latent heparanase, the cells were grown overnight in serum-free DMEM, and the conditioned medium (∼1 L) was purified on a Fractogel EMD SO3− (Merck, West Point, PA) column. The bound material was eluted with 1 M NaCl and was further purified by affinity chromatography on an anti-Myc (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) column. Using this procedure, we obtained a >95% pure 65-kDa nonenzymatically active heparanase preparation.

Human T cells

T cells were purified from healthy human donor peripheral blood. Whole blood was incubated with RosetteSep human T cell enrichment mixture (StemCell Technologies, Vencouver, British Columbia, Canada) for 20 min at room temperature. Next, the T cells were loaded on lymphocyte separation medium (ICN Biomedicals, Asse-Relegem, Belgium), isolated by density centrifugation, and washed. The purified cells obtained (>97% CD3+ T cells) were cultured in RPMI 1640 containing antibiotics, sodium pyruvate, glutamate, and 10% heat-inactivated FCS (13).

Binding of recombinant heparanase to immobilized ECM moieties

Flat-bottom microtiter well plates were precoated with FN or CO-IV (10 μg/ml), and the remaining binding sites were blocked with 0.1% BSA. Recombinant human heparanase was diluted in PBS containing 0.01% BSA and incubated on immobilized ECM proteins for 1 h at 37°C, 7% CO2 in a humidified atmosphere, and then gently washed. The remaining binding sites were blocked with 0.1% BSA. Bound protein was detected with anti-Myc tag mAb, followed by anti-mouse HRP-labeled rabbit polyclonal Ab. Peroxidase substrate (tetramethylbenzidine) was then added, and the reaction was stopped by 1 M H2SO4. The readouts represent the mean OD of triplicate samples obtained at 450 nm.

Shear flow assays

The flow chamber assays have been described in detail elsewhere (17, 18). Purified sVCAM-1 was mixed in coating medium (PBS buffered with 20 mM sodium bicarbonate, pH 8.5) with a fixed amount of carrier (2 μg/ml human serum albumin (HSA)) and adsorbed as 10-μl spots on polystyrene plates (BD Biosciences, Erembodegem, Belgium) for 18 h at 4°C, alone or with recombinant heparanase (2 μg/ml) with or without SDF-1α (2 μg/ml). Experiments with immobilized heparanase (2 μg/ml) in the absence of sVCAM-1 were also performed. Plates were washed and blocked with HSA (20 mg/ml). The flow chamber was mounted on the stage of an inverted phase contrast microscope (Diaphot 300; Nikon, Melville, NY). All flow experiments were conducted at 37°C. Cells were perfused at 106 cells/ml through the chamber at the desired flow rate generated with an automated syringe pump (Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MA). The entire periods of cell perfusion were recorded on a videotape with a high-resolution video camera (Applitech, Holon, Israel) and a Time Lapse SVHS-Video recorder (AG-6730; Panasonic, Tokyo, Japan). All cellular interactions with the adhesive substrates were determined by manually tracking the motions of individual cells along 0.9-mm field paths for 1 min. Categories of tethered cells were defined according to their subsequent motion (transient, rolling, rolling followed by arrest, and immediate arrest), as previously described (17, 18, 19). In each experiment, all events were normalized to a constant cell population flowing in the immediate proximity with the substrate. The frequency of each category of tethers was expressed in the percentage of units (event × cell−1 × 102). To block the integrin α4β1 chain on the perfused T cells, the cells were preincubated for 5 min in binding medium with 5 μg of blocking mAb HP1/2 (10 μg/ml) and perfused unwashed over the substrates. To abrogate T cell interactions with immobilized heparanase, we pretreated the cells with an excess of soluble heparanase (2 μg/ml) and then placed in the flow chambers without washing.

T cell adhesion and migration assays

Analysis of T cell adhesion to ECM components was determined, as previously described (20, 21). Briefly, flat-bottom tissue culture-treated microtiter plates were precoated with FN, LN, CO-I, CO-IV (10 μg/ml), or HA (50 μg/ml), and the remaining binding sites were blocked with 0.1% BSA. Next, 51Cr-labeled T cells were resuspended in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 1% HEPES buffer and 0.1% BSA (adhesion medium). Then the indicated activators were added to the cells, and they were seeded onto the wells (105 cells/well). The plates were further incubated (30 min, 37°C in a 7% CO2-humidified atmosphere) and then gently washed. The adherent cells were lysed (1 M NaOH, 0.1% Triton X-100 in H2O), removed, and counted using a gamma counter (Packard, Downers Grove, IL). The results are expressed as the mean (±SD) percentage of bound T cells from quadruplicate wells. Where indicated, the purified human T cells were pretreated (1 h under tissue culture conditions in serum-free medium) with Flavobacterium heparinum-derived heparinase II (1 U/ml; Sigma-Aldrich). The cells were then extensively washed, radioactively labeled, and placed onto FN-coated microtiter wells in the presence of the recombinant human heparanase or PMA. Where indicated, the following inhibitors of intracellular signal transduction pathways were used: wortmanin (a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor), GF109203X (a protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor), PD98059 (an ERK inhibitor), and pertussis toxin (a G protein inhibitor), all obtained from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA).

The migration of 51Cr-labeled T cells was examined in a 48-well Transwell chemotaxis apparatus (6.5 mm diameter; Corning Glass, Corning, NY), consisting of two compartments separated by polycarbonate filters (5 μm pore size) pretreated (1 h, 37°C) with FN (25 μg/ml), as previously described (22). 51Cr-labeled T cells (2 × 105 in 100 μl of RPMI 1640 containing 0.1% BSA, antibiotics) were added to the upper chambers with or without the indicated activators. The bottom chambers contained 0.6 ml of the same medium, with or without human SDF-1α (200 ng/ml). After incubation at 37°C for 3 h, cells that had transmigrated into the lower wells were collected, centrifuged, and lysed (in 100 μl of distilled water containing 1 M NaOH and 0.1% Triton X-100), and the radioactivity in the resulting supernatants was determined with a gamma counter. The percentage (±SD) of cell migration was calculated as the radioactivity counts in the lysates of the lower chambers divided by the total counts.

Western blot analysis of T cell lysates

Human T cells were incubated in starvation medium (RPMI 1640 medium without serum) for 48 h. Before testing, 5 × 106 cells per sample were treated with soluble heparanase (usually 10 ng/ml) for 10 or 40 min (37°C in a 7% CO2-humidified atmosphere) washed or left in the same medium, with or without subsequent incubation with SDF-1α (100 ng/ml, 10 min). The reaction was terminated by freezing the plates at −70°C for 10 min. The thawed cells were lysed (60 min, 4°C) in buffer containing EDTA (0.5 mM), NaCl (150 mM), NaF (10 nM), Tris (25 mM), Triton X-100 (1%), PMSF (200 μg/ml), and phosphatase inhibitor mixture (1%; Sigma-Aldrich), and cleared by centrifugation (30 min, 14 × 103 rpm), and the supernatants were analyzed for total protein content (using the Bradford assay). Reducing sample buffer was then added, the samples were boiled, and aliquots containing equal amounts of protein were separated on 10% SDS-PAGE gel and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were blocked (TBST buffer containing low-fat milk (5%), Tris (pH 7.5, 20 mM), NaCl (135 mM), and Tween 20 (0.1%)) and probed with appropriate Abs. Immunoreactive protein bands were visualized using HRP-conjugated secondary Ab and the ECL system (22).

Results

Intact or VCAM-1-associated recombinant heparanase regulates resting or SDF-1α-activated human T cell rolling and arrest

We first wished to identify possible nonenzymatic functions of heparanase under conditions resembling those found in small blood vessels (possibly adjacent to inflamed areas) in vivo. To this end, we analyzed T cell interactions with nonezymatically active heparanase, under low shear flow conditions (0.5 dyn/cm2). The results, shown in Fig. 1⇓A, indicate that the freshly isolated and purified human CD3+ T cells did not respond (e.g., adherence or rolling) to the HSA-coated surface (as shown in the left-hand side bar). This control group also indicates that the components of the serum, present in the medium, did not affect T cell behavior in this system. However, the T cells responded markedly (p < 0.01) to the plastic-bound heparanase by increasing their propensity to interact either transiently or stably with the enzyme-coated surfaces. This was manifested by the ability of a large fraction of the flowing cells to rapidly tether and either roll immediately or become arrested after encountering the immobilized heparanase. Note that the addition of soluble heparanase completely (p < 0.01) abrogated the effect of the bound enzyme on T cell arrest under flow conditions, but only moderately inhibited the effect of the bound enzyme on the T cells’ transient arrest. This is probably due to the fact that the cumulative influence of these forms of heparanase affects the occupancy and distribution of its putative cell surface receptor(s), as was suggested in explaining the rapid effects of SDF-1α on CXCR4-mediated T cell arrest and rolling measured under identical experimental conditions (17). This also suggests that only the bound (immobilized) form of the enzyme mediates the T cells’ arrest under flow conditions. Thus, intact heparanase alone can capture flowing T cells and induce their rolling and subsequent firm adhesion under shear flow conditions, even in the absence of selectin and integrin ligands. This suggests that such rapid T cell interaction with heparanase does not involve the activation of T cell adhesion receptors, such as integrins or selectins. Thus, heparanase may serve as a ligand for T cell adhesion by itself.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Regulation of T cell tethering events by heparanase. A, Recombinant human heparanase (65 kDa) was immobilized on plastic for 18 h with HSA as a carrier protein, and the unbound protein was then washed. Purified T cells were resuspended at 106 cells/ml, and placed in the flow chambers in the presence or absence of soluble heparanase (2 μg/ml). B, Heparanase was coimmobilized with sVCAM-1 (2 μg/ml) alone or with sVCAM-1 and SDF-1α (2 μg/ml). The involvement of integrin activation in heparanase-induced tethering events was assessed by treating T cells with mAb anti-β1 integrin (designated HP1/2; 15 μg/ml) for 5 min before the placement of the cells in the flow chambers. T cell interactions with the immobilized substrates under shear flow conditions were calculated, as described in Materials and Methods. The results shown here are from one experiment representative of three independent experiments.

Next, we measured the ability of VCAM-1-associated heparanase to modulate T cell arrest and rolling under shear flow conditions mediated by α4β1 (VLA-4), in the absence or presence of the proadhesive chemokine SDF-1α (CXCL12). The results, shown in Fig. 1⇑B, indicate that VCAM-1-associated heparanase can synergize with SDF-1α to promote both the rolling and arrest of human T cells interacting with VCAM-1. Interestingly, when the cells were exposed to both VCAM-1-complexed heparanase and coimmobilized SDF-1α, the proportion of cells completely arrested, as well as rolled/arrested, on VCAM-1 was significantly increased (p < 0.05), whereas their ability to roll over the immobilized ligands was decreased. This suggests that the juxtaposition of both VCAM-1-bound heparanase and the CXC chemokine induced a firm, rather than transient, T cell adhesion to the matrix. It is noteworthy that a nonspecific protein, HSA, which was used as a carrier protein for heparanase and SDF-1α, had no effect on T cell/VCAM-1 interactions. This also indicates that components of the serum, present in the cell medium, did not regulate this mode of interaction of T cells with VCAM-1 (Fig. 1⇑B).

We also assessed the involvement of the α4β1 integrin in these interactions by pretreating the cells with anti-VLA4 mAb, designated HP1/2, which was shown to inhibit the effects of SDF-1α in T cell interactions with endothelial cell ligands under shear flow conditions (17). We found that similar concentrations of the mAb (e.g., 15 μg/ml) abrogated, to some extent, the heparanase- and SDF-1α-induced transient arrest and rolling of T cells. This partial effect of the mAb indicates that, although such T cell responses were mediated primarily by the α4β1 integrin, other receptors, such as the putative heparanase-binding moieties, may concomitantly contribute to the heparanase- and SDF-1α-induced T cell behavior under such shear flow conditions. Thus, the intrinsic capturing ability of heparanase (Fig. 1⇑A) can potentially augment both constitutive and VLA-4-mediated T cell interactions with vessel wall-associated VCAM-1 (Fig. 1⇑B), as well as cooperate with chemokine-induced tethering of T cells under shear flow. Our results indicate that under such circumstances, heparanase can act in concert with the SDF-1α present on inflamed endothelial cells and aid in recruiting T cells to sites of inflammation.

Heparanase induces T cell adhesion to ECM, HA, CO-IV, and FN in a substrate-specific receptor manner

T cell adhesion to components of the ECM is a fundamental step in their migration from blood vessels into inflamed tissue. Therefore, we examined the ability of the recombinant heparanase to induce T cell adhesion to immobilized ECM ligands in a static adhesion assay. T cell adhesion in the absence of immobilized ECM components, but in the presence of the immobilized control substrate HSA, was always 2 ± 2% (data not shown). The results, shown in Fig. 2⇓A, indicate that heparanase induced significant levels of adhesion not only to ECM, but also to its immobilized intact components, including HA, which can also be found on blood vessel walls, in a dose-dependent manner, reaching a maximal effect at 10 ng/ml. Note that heparanase induced a significantly higher level of adhesion to FN (30% at 10 ng/ml), but had a lesser effect on unfractionated ECM, HA, and CO-IV: 20, 18, and 14% T cell adhesion, respectively. The parabolic dose-response curve of adhesion indicates a specific threshold effect of heparanase (i.e., 1–100 ng/ml), in which higher concentrations may have induced inhibition in heparanase effects in a receptor-desensitization manner. We also compared the adhesive effect of heparanase with that induced by SDF-1α and found that heparanase (at 10 ng/ml) induced a marked level of T cell adhesion to FN, comparable to that induced by SDF-1α (100 ng/ml): 28% compared with 24%, respectively, and that these effects did not involve the modulation of expression of β1 integrins (or CXCR4; data not shown).

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Heparanase induces T cell adhesion to ECM and ECM constituents in a HSPG-dependent manner. A, Human T cells were labeled with 51Cr and seeded onto microtiter wells, coated with ECM, FN, HA, or CO-IV in the presence of different amounts of heparanase. The fraction of adherent cells was determined after 40 min. Mean ± SD of quadriplicate wells is shown. The results shown here are from one experiment representative of three. Value of p < 0.01 for the heparanase-induced T cell adhesion to FN, HA, and ECM, when the enzyme’s concentrations were 10–100 ng/ml. B, T cells were pretreated (1 h, tissue culture conditions, serum-free medium) with heparinase II (1 U/ml). The cells were then extensively washed, radioactively labeled, and placed onto FN-coated microtiter wells in the presence of the human heparanase (100 ng/ml) or PMA (50 ng/ml), and their adhesion was measured as above. For both A and B, T cell adhesion obtained in one experiment representative of three is shown. ∗, p < 0.01.

It is conceivable that the T cells’ surface-expressed HSPG play a role in mediating the proadhesive functioning of heparanase. To examine this possibility, the cells were pretreated with heparinase (1 h, 1 U/ml), a heparin- and HS-degrading bacterial enzyme, and their FN-adhesive capacities were examined after removing the enzyme from the culture medium. The results indicate that the heparinase pretreatment did not affect the basal responses of T cells to FN, nor did it affect the PMA-induced T cell adhesion. In contrast, the T cell HSPG appears to be involved in mediating the effects of heparanase, as the T cell-adhesive response to the enzyme was markedly (p < 0.05) suppressed (Fig. 2⇑B).

Next, we examined the role of CD29 (the common β1 integrin chain) and CD44 in the heparanase-induced T cell adhesion to FN and HA. We compared the effects of heparanase with that of IL-2, which served as a control proinflammatory cytokine. IL-2- and heparanase-induced T cell adhesion to FN was markedly inhibited by mAb anti-CD29 (and not by mAb anti-CD44), as well as peptides representing FN α4β1 and α5β1 integrin-specific LDV- and RGD-containing amino acid sequences, respectively (Fig. 3⇓A). In parallel, T cell adhesion to HA induced by either IL-2 or heparanase was specifically inhibited by mAb anti-CD44 (Fig. 3⇓B). Note that although we used an optimal inhibitory concentration of the mAb anti-CD44 (e.g., 15 μg/ml) (21), it did not fully abolish the heparanase-induced T cell adhesion to HA, suggesting that in addition to its effect on CD44, heparanase induces the functioning of other, putative HA-specific receptors. Taken together, these results indicate that even in the absence of HSPG in the substrates, the enzymatically quiescent heparanase can induce marked T cell adhesion to ECM and its immobilized ligands in an integrin, as well as CD44-dependent manner.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Heparanase-induced T cell adhesion to FN and HA is dependent on CD29 and CD44, respectively. A, T cells were radiolabeled, pretreated (1 h) with mAb specific to the β1 integrin chain (anti-CD29, 10 μg/ml), or the RGD-, LDV-, or RGE-containing peptides (20 μg/ml). Next, heparanase (100 ng/ml) was added to the cell suspensions, which were then seeded onto FN-coated microtiter wells, and the amount of cell adhesion was assessed 40 min later. Mean ± SD of quadruplicate wells of one experiment representative of five is shown. B, Labeled T cells were incubated with mAb anti-CD44 (15 μg/ml) or anti-CD29, and then placed on microtiter plates that were precoated with HA (50 μg/ml), in the presence of soluble heparanase (100 ng/ml) for 3 h. The adherent cells were then lysed, and the amount of cell-associated radioactivity was measured. For A and B, ∗ and ∗∗, p < 0.01 comparing the mAb- or peptide-treated cells with the untreated cells. Mean ± SD of one experiment representative of four experiments is shown.

Analysis of the signaling pathways involved in the heparanase-induced T cell-FN interactions

We examined the putative functional role of diverse intracellular signaling pathways that regulate the heparanase-mediated T cell adhesion to FN. To this end, T cell adhesion to FN was assessed following exposure of the cells to SDF-1α, heparanase (both at 10 ng/ml), or PMA (25 ng/ml), while also being exposed to active concentrations of specific inhibitors of cell signaling. The results, shown in Fig. 4⇓, indicate that similar to the effect of PMA, the heparanase-induced T cell adhesion appears to involve specific intracellular signaling pathways, including the PI3K, PKC, and ERK pathways, which are associated with leukocyte cytoskeletal rearrangement, integrin functioning, and cell adhesion (23), because signaling was inhibited by the wortmanin, GF109203X (GF), and PD98059 (PD), respectively, but not by pertussis toxin (PTX), which inhibits G protein-coupled receptor signaling (Fig. 4⇓, A and B). We could not observe significant changes in cell morphology under these conditions (data not shown). Because these results show the net outcome of T cell adhesion to FN (after 30 min in a static adhesion assay), we cannot demonstrate, at the present time, which particular step in T cell adhesion is sensitive to the inhibitory compounds. In contrast, and as expected, SDF-1α-induced T cell adhesion was also inhibited by PTX (Fig. 4⇓C). Thus, although the involvement of heparanase in inducing these particular T cell activatory pathways should be examined also in the shear flow assay, our findings suggest that the enzyme is capable of affecting the PI3K, PKC, and ERK intracellular signaling pathways, which are associated with T cell-ECM interactions.

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

Signaling elements involved in the PMA-, heparanase-, and SDF-1α-induced T cell adhesion to FN. Purified and 51Cr-labeled human T cells were pretreated with the indicated intracellular signal transduction inhibitors wortmannin (5 nM), GF109203X (GF; 20 nM), PD98059 (PD; 20 μM), and PTX (2 μg/ml), or left untreated. The cells were then activated with PMA (100 ng/ml; A), heparanase (100 ng/ml; B), or SDF-1α (150 ng/ml; C), and seeded, in quadriplicates, onto FN-precoated microtiter wells. The level of T cell adhesion was determined 30 min later by measuring the amount of radioactivity in the lysates of the bound cells. Mean ± SD representative of three separate experiments. Except for PTX in A and B, all the other compounds, including PTX in C, significantly (p < 0.01) inhibited T cell adhesion to FN.

Heparanase induces Pyk-2 and ERK phosphorylation and enhances SDF-1a-induced phosphorylation of these moieties

To gain further insight into the pathways through which heparanase exerts its proadhesive functions, we examined the effect of heparanase, with or without SDF-1α, on the actual activation (phosphorylation) of the cytoskeletal and integrin-associated components, ERK and Pyk-2. The 120-kDa proline-rich cytoplasmatic tyrosine kinase 2, also called Pyk-2, is a member of the focal adhesion kinase family, which upon the phosphorylation of tyrosine, links β1 integrins to multiple signaling pathways involved in cell adhesion and migration (24). Such intracellular processes are also involved in the regulation of mitogen-activated protein kinases, such as the ERK-2 and Jun-NH2 pathways (23, 25). As shown in Fig. 5⇓, heparanase (10 ng/ml) induced a marked phosphorylation of Pyk-2, comparable to that induced by SDF-1α alone (100 ng/ml for 10 min). When both mediators were simultaneously present, the amount of Pyk-2 phosphorylation was higher than that induced by either one of them alone (Fig. 5⇓A). Note that these intracellular effects of heparanase are probably β1 integrin independent, because these studies were performed in the absence of immobilized ECM ligands. Thus, similar to its proadhesive effect, the biologically active concentration of heparanase induces Pyk-2 phosphorylation, and augments this activatory pathway upon cotreatment of the cells with SDF-1α.

FIGURE 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5.

Heparanase enhances SDF-1α-induced phosphorylation of Pyk-2 and ERK-2. A, T cells (5 × 106 per group) were treated (10 min) with heparanase (10 ng/ml) and/or SDF-1α (100 ng/ml), frozen at −70°C, and lysed. The lysates were run on 10% SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, and immunoblotted with peroxidase-labeled anti-phospho-Pyk-2 (pPYK2) and anti-total Pyk-2 (tPYK2) Abs, followed by ECL visualization and densitometry. One experiment representative of three is shown. B and C, T cells were incubated with heparanase (100 ng/ml) for 10 or 40 min, and then left in the same medium (B), or washed and resuspended in fresh medium (C) and exposed to SDF-1α (250 ng/ml) for 10 min. T cell lysates were then immunoblotted with the indicated Ab. One experiment representative of five is shown. The histograms represent a ratio between band density of phosphorylated and total protein for each sample.

We also measured the ability of heparanase to affect the phosphorylation of ERK. The results demonstrate that exposure of T cells to heparanase markedly elevated the SDF-1α-induced ERK phosphorylation, whether both mediators were simultaneously present in the T cell cultures, or whether the cells were first exposed to heparanase, and then washed and exposed to SDF-1α (Fig. 5⇑, B and C). Thus, heparanase, which induces Pyk-2 phosphorylation, also augments the SDF-1α-induced activation of this protein kinase, as well as that of ERK (which is not phosphorylated in response to heparanase alone; data not shown). It is noteworthy that although Fig. 5⇑ depicts the results of one experiment of three to five done on T cells from different donors, we always observed the same pattern of effects of heparanase on Pyk-2 and ERK. Interestingly, analysis of T cell from five different donors revealed that both the p42 and p44 isoforms of ERK were similarly affected (e.g., phosphorylated) by heparanase, although, as shown in this work, the level of phosphorylation of the p44 isoform was always lower than that of the p42 isoform. These findings may explain the ability of heparanase to activate ECM-specific receptors (i.e., β1 integrins), and its ability to rapidly stimulate T cell responses (e.g., adhesion, chemotaxis) to SDF-1α, induced by its T cell surface receptor, CXCR4.

Heparanase binds FN, retains its proadhesive activity, and regulates SDF-1α-induced chemotaxis

We have previously demonstrated that at pH 7.2, the placental-extracted heparanase can bind, but not degrade, HSPG, and thus, noncovalently associate with ECM (13). We therefore questioned whether the highly purified recombinant heparanase can also bind FN, assuming that such molecular interactions with this major cell-adhesive glycoprotein of the ECM may serve to preserve heparanase, in its enzymatic or nonenzymatic active forms, within the context of migrating lymphocytes. To this end, the microtiter wells were precoated with FN and CO-IV, and the remaining uncoated binding sites were blocked with BSA. Next, heparanase binding to immobilized FN (and CO-IV) was examined using specific anti-c-Myc tag Ab. The results, depicted in Fig. 6⇓A, show that the values of heparanase binding to the ECM substrates are above those obtained with BSA alone. Moreover, they indicate that the human heparanase binds FN in a dose-dependent manner, reaching a saturable amount of binding at 1–4 μg/ml; calculation of the amount of the FN-bound enzyme revealed that ∼1–2.5% of the input protein actually remained bound to FN (data not shown). In addition, heparanase bound, although to a much lesser degree, to CO-IV.

FIGURE 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 6.

Heparanase binds to FN and promotes T cell chemotaxis toward SDF-1α. A, Different concentrations of heparanase were incubated (1 h, 37°C) on FN- or CO-IV-coated microtiter wells, in the presence of 0.01% BSA as a carrier. The unbound material was removed, and bound heparanase was detected using mAb anti-c-Myc tag, followed by HRP-labeled secondary Ab, and substrate. The amount of bound protein was measured (at 450 nm) using a spectrophotometer. The binding values of heparanase shown were calculated as those obtained above the binding of the enzyme to immobilized BSA alone. Mean ± STD of triplicate wells of one experiment representative of two is shown. B, Polycarbonate membranes, separating the upper and lower chambers of the Transwell apparatus, were precoated with FN (1 h, 37°C), and further pretreated with heparanase or PBS (1 h, 37°C, pH 7.4). Next, the membranes were washed extensively, and the labeled T cells were placed in the upper wells, while SDF-1α was added to the lower chambers. T cell migration along the SDF-1α gradients was assayed after 2.5 h under tissue culture conditions. ∗, p < 0.01 compared with the other groups. C, T cells were placed in the upper chambers, and heparanase (100 ng/ml) was added to the upper or lower chambers, with or without SDF-1α. After 2.5 h, the cells in the lower chambers were collected by centrifugation and lysed, and their radioactivity was measured. ∗, p < 0.01 vs control, and ∗∗, p < 0.01 of the SDF-1α- and heparanase-treated groups was compared with the other groups. Values shown are mean ± SD, of a single experiment representative of three.

Next, we examined the biological ramifications of the FN-heparanase complexes by measuring T cell chemotaxis, through the immobilized ECM glycoprotein, in the absence or presence of SDF-1α. In the absence of SDF-1α, FN-bound heparanase did not affect T cell migration. However, the FN-bound heparanase markedly augmented (p < 0.01) the promigratory capacity of SDF-1α, from 30% in the absence of heparanase to 74% in the presence of the FN-heparanase complex (Fig. 6⇑B). Thus, the FN-bound heparanase enhances T cell responses to SDF-1α, as manifested in increased chemotaxis.

Finally, we examined whether soluble heparanase can induce T cell migration when it forms a concentration-dependent gradient in the Transwell system. The results indicate that, in contrast to the SDF-1α-induced T cell chemotaxis, soluble heparanase had no apparent promigratory effect on T cells (Fig. 6⇑C). However, when both mediators were placed in the bottom chambers, thus creating a combination of two chemotactic gradients, a marked elevation in T cell chemotaxis occurred (27% in the presence of SDF-1α vs 44% migration in the presence of both mediators; p < 0.01). Thus, soluble heparanase synergizes with SDF-1α to promote enhanced T cell chemotaxis through FN.

Discussion

The entry of T cells into extravascular tissues requires their recognition of blood vessel wall and ECM components, as well as the ability to orchestrate their migration based on signals received from cytokines, chemokines, acute phase reactants, and growth factors presented to the cells in soluble or cell- or ECM-bound forms (26, 27). Indeed, it has been demonstrated that some of these mediators can exert a profound biological effect when bound to blood vessel walls and ECM moieties, although their actual local concentration may be low (26, 28). We and others have shown that ECM-associated mediators, such as TNF-α, TGF-β, macrophage-inflammatory protein-1β, and RANTES, can regulate T cell adhesion and chemotaxis (20, 28, 29, 30). We also have demonstrated that, depending on the local pH, crude preparations of human placental heparanase can bind avidly to ECM-heparan sulfate proteoglycans and, thus, serve as a proadhesive mediator for human T cells (13). However, the relatively impure preparations of this enzyme that were available prevented us from continuing to study its immunological effect. The recent cloning and purification of human heparanase and the verification of its biological effects and availability (31, 32), as well as that of its enzymatically inactive counterpart, enabled us to study the putative T cell adhesion and chemotaxis-regulating effects of this 65-kDa protein. In addition, this study was prompted by the recent finding that the membrane-bound (e.g., immobilized) form of heparanase (14) induces adhesion of lymphoma cells to the ECM (15). Interestingly, this lymphoma cell adhesion was augmented irrespective of whether the cells were transfected with active or point-mutated, nonactive enzyme, indicating that heparanase functions as an adhesion molecule independent of its endoglycosidase activity.

Heparanase is occasionally expressed on the surface of leukemic and normal T cells, and dysplastic and neoplastic human colonic mucosa and stroma (14, 15, 33). This finding supports the notion that such a membrane-associated enzyme is involved in processes other than degradation of HSPG, and that its membrane-bound form favors cell adhesion. Our results indicate that heparanase may function within small blood vessels, and that it retains its proadhesive property even under shear flow conditions. This implies that heparanase secreted by moving cells in extravascular sites may diffuse into the vessels, and be presented to activated leukocytes on endothelial cell surfaces, and thus, participate in regulating T cell firm adhesion to endothelial cell ligands and their subsequent extravasation, in a manner similar to chemokines (17, 18, 34). In this respect, our findings also indicate that, together with a potent T cell chemokine SDF-1α, heparanase may have a role in augmenting VLA-4-mediated T cell adhesion to VCAM-1 on endothelial cells, as well as other T cell-adhesive and migratory interactions with ECM ligands, such as FN and HA. Although demonstrated to rapidly capture T cells from the flow in a reductionist experimental approach, using purified molecules and model substrates, we did not prove that heparanase binds VCAM-1 or cultured HUVEC cells, and thus could not assess its activity under more physiologic settings. Thus, the ability of the enzyme, once secreted by blood-borne cells, to get displayed on specific endothelial beds in vivo remains to be demonstrated. It would also be interesting to examine how soluble FN, found in the sera of healthy individuals, affects T cell responses to heparanase under shear flow conditions. However, in our systems, we preferred to focus on the effects of (soluble or immobilized) heparanase alone on T cell interactions with VCAM-1, assuming that such a reductionist approach would shed some light on the enzyme’s role within blood vessels.

It has been found that transglutaminase, a member of a family of Ca2+-dependent, intracellular and extracellular enzymes, also augments CD8+ T cell interactions with matrix and cytokine-activated HUVEC (35, 36), suggesting that other enzymes can also exhibit novel proadhesive and promigratory roles under inflammatory conditions. We have also found that FN-bound or soluble heparanase, which lacks chemotactic activity by itself, increased the promigratory potential of the CXC chemokine, SDF-1α, suggesting that within inflamed areas, heparanase may affect T cell functions in concert with other proinflammatory mediators.

Our results demonstrate that the T cell’s encounter with (soluble or bound) heparanase rapidly activates the intracellular kinases, ERK and Pyk-2, implicated in cell adhesion signaling (25). The rapid and pronounced effect of heparanase on T cell tethering and rolling (to heparanase alone and to VCAM-1; Fig. 1⇑) under shear flow conditions, in comparison with its effects on T cell adhesion and chemotaxis in the static assays, implies that heparanase may affect these T cell functions in diverse manners. Under the specified shear flow conditions, heparanase may modulate the clustering of its own receptors or the VLA-4, as was proposed for the mode of action of SDF-1α on VLA-4/VCAM-1 interactions, when the chemokine was applied to leukocytes under similar flow conditions (17). In contrast, under the relatively prolonged static conditions of cell adhesion to the ECM ligands, heparanase, by affecting the intracellular cytoskeletal-associated signaling elements, may affect the binding affinities of these receptors. The differences in time kinetics and shear forces between these two types of T cell adhesion assays may also account for the apparent differences in the dose-response effects of the enzyme. In the shear flow assay, a relatively high amount of the enzyme was required (e.g., 1–2 μg/ml), whereas in the static adhesion assay, a significantly smaller amount (e.g., 10–100 ng/ml) was sufficient to induce marked effects. However, it is noteworthy that in the T cell chemotaxis assay, 2 μg/ml heparanase was required to augment the promigratory effect of SDF-1α, although, when used alone, heparanase did not induce T cell chemotaxis. Although the mechanisms underlying these effects await to be clarified, these findings indicate that heparanase should be used in higher concentrations to exert its promigratory potential in concert with those of SDF-1α, under both the shear flow and static conditions.

Interestingly, we could not detect any morphological changes in the heparanase-responsive T cells, nor could we demonstrate actin cytoskeleton rearrangement in the matrix-bound lymphocytes (data not shown). Therefore, it is plausible that heparanase initially mediates cell attachment, and later, the actual activation of cell adhesion molecules. It was shown that the cell surface-expressed heparanase also activates cytoskeletal elements, such as focal adhesion kinase, and that the spreading of lymphoma cells depends on paxillin phosphorylation (15). Note that our findings also suggest that, in addition to its effect on β1 integrins, heparanase activates CD44, and thus, may be involved in mediating migrating cell interactions with HA, found within and outside blood vessels.

What is the nature of the putative T cell heparanase-binding moiety? The answer to this question is not clear at the moment. We found that a small proportion of radiolabeled heparanse bound to the T cells (data not shown). It is conceivable that the T cells’ HSPG play a role in mediating the proadhesive effects of heparanase. In this respect, it has been recently shown that such proteoglycans can bind and present IL-2 to responsive leukocytes (37). In this study, we found that Flavobacterium heparinum-derived heparinase pretreatment of human T cells abrogated their subsequent responses to heparanase, but not to PMA, implying that the cell surface (and ECM)-associated HSPG can present the enzyme to its recognizing and responsive T cell’s elements. We are currently exploring the existence and identity of a TCR for heparanase, and the ability of ECM- and cell surface-associated glycosaminoglycans and proteoglycans to regulate the proadhesive and prochemotactic effects of heparanase. Also, once we will have available a specific mAb anti-heparanase, it will be interesting to examine its putative existence in inflamed tissues, and its association with ECM components.

We propose that during inflammation, heparanase is secreted in physiologically meaningful amounts by diverse types of blood-borne and tissue-resident cells, such as T cells, macrophages, neutrophils (2, 3, 12), platelets (38, 39), and fibroblasts (40). In this way, heparanase regulates diverse T cell functions, including the entrance and movements of T cells into and within the ECM, and their tethering, adhesion, and chemokine-induced adhesion and chemotaxis in blood vessels and, later, in tissues. Taken together, our results further emphasize the versatility of heparanase, alone or in the presence of SDF-1α, consequently affecting the ultimate direction of T cell navigation within tissues. Once the pH decreases to the levels found in tumor sites and inflammation, heparanase can exhibit its classical endoglycosidase activity, in degrading ECM (or cell surface-expressed) HSPG.

Footnotes

  • ↵1 This study was supported by the Minerva Foundation, funded by the Committee for Scientific Cooperation between Germany and Israel, and by the Israel Science Foundation, funded by the Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities.

  • ↵2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Ofer Lider, Department of Immunology, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel. E-mail address: ofer.lider{at}weizmann.ac.il

  • ↵3 Abbreviations used in this paper: ECM, extracellular matrix; CO, collagen; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; FN, fibronectin; HA, hyaluronic acid; HSA, human serum albumin; HSPG, heparan sulfate proteoglycan; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; PKC, protein kinase C; PTX, pertussis toxin; SDF-1α, stromal cell-derived factor 1α; sVCAM-1, soluble VCAM-1.

  • Received October 23, 2003.
  • Accepted February 13, 2004.
  • Copyright © 2004 by The American Association of Immunologists

References

  1. ↵
    Vlodavsky, I., O. Goldshmidt, E. Zcharia, R. Atzmon, Z. Rangini-Guatta, M. Elkin, T. Peretz, Y. Friedmann. 2002. Mammalian heparanase: involvement in cancer metastasis, angiogenesis, and normal development. Semin. Cancer Biol. 12:121.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Mollinedo, F., M. Nakajima, A. Llorens, E. Barbosa, S. Callejo, C. Gajate, A. Fabra. 1997. Major co-localization of the ECM-degradative enzymes heparanase and gelatinase in tertiary granules of human neutrophils. Biochem. J. 327:917.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Kosir, M. A., P. A. Foley-Loudon, R. Finkenauer, S. D. Tennenberg. 2002. Multiple heparanases are expressed in polymorphonuclear cells. J. Surg. Res. 103:100.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Bame, K. J.. 2001. Heparanases: endoglycosidases that degrade heparan sulfate proteoglycans. Glycobiology 11:91.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    Lynch, C. C., L. M. Matrisian. 2002. Matrix metalloproteinases in tumor-host cell communication. Differentiation 70:561.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Seiki, M.. 2002. The cell surface: the stage for matrix metalloproteinase regulation of migration. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 14:624.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Opdenakker, G., P. E. Van den Steen, J. Van Damme. 2001. Gelatinase B: a tuner and amplifier of immune functions. Trends Immunol. 22:571.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Nelissen, I., E. Martens, P. E. Van den Steen, P. Proost, I. Ronsse, G. Opdenakker. 2003. Gelatinase B/matrix metalloproteinase-9 cleaves interferon-β and is a target for immunotherapy. Brain 126:1371.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Overall, C. M., G. A. McQuibban, I. Clark-Lewis. 2002. Discovery of chemokine substrates for matrix metalloproteinases by exosite scanning: a new tool for degradomics. Biol. Chem. 383:1059.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Dempsey, L. A., G. J. Brunn, J. L. Platt. 2000. Heparanase, a potential regulator of cell-matrix interactions. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25:349.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Vlodavsky, I., Y. Friedmann. 2001. Molecular properties and involvement of heparanase in cancer metastasis and angiogenesis. J. Clin. Invest. 108:341.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Parish, C. R., C. Freeman, M. D. Hulett. 2001. Heparanase: a key enzyme involved in cell invasion. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1471:99.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    Gilat, D., R. Hershkoviz, L. Cahalon, I. Goldkorn, G. Korner, I. Vlodavsky, O. Lider. 1995. Molecular behavior adapts to context: heparanase functions as an extracellular matrix-degrading enzyme or as a T cell adhesion molecule, depending on the local pH. J. Exp. Med. 181:1929.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Goldsmith, O., E. Zacharia, R. Abramovitch, S. Metzger, H. Aingorn, Y. Friedmann, V. Schirrmacher, E. Mitrani, I. Vlodavsky. 2002. Cell surface expression and secretion of heparanase markedly promote tumor angiogenesis and metastasis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:10031.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Goldsmith, O., E. Zacharia, M. Cohen, H. Aingorn. I. Cohen, L. Nadav, B.-Z. Katz, B. Geiger, I. Vlodavsky. 2003. Heparanase mediates cell adhesion independent of its enzymatic activity. FASEB J. 17:1015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Nanki, T., K. Hayashid, H. S. El-Gabalawy, S. Suson, K. Shi, H. J. Girschick, S. Yavuz, P. E. Lipsky. 2000. Stromal cell-derived factor-1-CXC chemokine receptor 4 interactions play a central role in CD4+ T-cell accumulation in rheumatoid arthritis synovium. J. Immunol. 165:6590.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Grabovsky, V., S. Feigelson, C. Chen, D. A. Bleijs, A. Peled, G. Cinamon, F. Baleux, F. Arenzana-Seisdedos, T. Lapidot, Y. van Kooyk, et al 2000. Subsecond induction of α4 integrin clustering by immobilized chemokines stimulates leukocyte tethering and rolling on endothelial vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 under flow conditions. J. Exp. Med. 192:495.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Chen, C., J. L. Mobley, O. Dwir, F. Shimron, V. Grabovsky, R. R. Lobb, Y. Shimizu, R. Alon. 1999. High affinity very late antigen-4 subsets expressed on T cells are mandatory for spontaneous adhesion strengthening but not for rolling on VCAM-1 in shear flow. J. Immunol. 162:1084.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Alon, R., D. A. Hammer, T. A. Springer. 1995. Lifetime of the P-selectin-carbohydrate bond and its response to tensile force in hydrodynamic flow. Nature 374:539.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Gilat, D., R. Hershkoviz, Y. A. Mekori, I. Vlodavsky, O. Lider. 1994. Regulation of adhesion of CD4+ T lymphocytes to intact or heparinase-treated subendothelial extracellular matrix by diffusible or anchored RANTES and MIP-1β. J. Immunol. 153:4899.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  21. ↵
    Ariel, A., E. J. Yavin, R. Hershkoviz, A. Avron, S. Franitza, I. Hardan, L. Cahalon, M. Fridkin, O. Lider. 1998. IL-2 induces T cell adherence to extracellular matrix: inhibition of adherence and migration by IL-2 peptides generated by leukocyte elastase. J. Immunol. 161:2465.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Hecht, I., L. Cahalon, R. Hershkoviz, A. Lahat, S. Franitza, O. Lider. 2003. Heterologous desensitization of T-cell functions by CCR5 and CXCR4 ligands: inhibition of cellular signaling, adhesion, and chemotaxis. Int. Immunol. 15:29.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    Woods, M. L., Y. Shimizu. 2001. Signaling networks regulating β1 integrin-mediated adhesion of T lymphocytes to extracellular matrix. J. Leukocyte Biol. 69:874.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Serrador, J. M., M. Nieto, F. Sanchez-Madrid. 1999. Cytoskeletal rearrangement during migration and activation of T lymphocytes. Trends Cell Biol. 9:228.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Damsky, C. H., D. Ilic. 2002. Integrin signaling: it’s where the action is. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 14:594.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Nathan, C., M. Sporn. 1991. Cytokines in context. J. Cell Biol. 113:981.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Savino, W., D. A. Mendes-da-Cruz, J. S. Silva, M. Dardenne, V. Cotta-de-Almeida. 2002. Intrathymic T-cell migration: a combinatorial interplay of extracellular matrix and chemokines?. Trends Immunol. 23:305.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    Vaday, G. G., S. Franitza, H. Schor, I. Hecht, A. Brill, L. Cahalon, R. Hershkoviz, O. Lider. 2001. Combinatorial signals by inflammatory cytokines and chemokines mediate leukocyte interactions with extracellular matrix and secretion of enzymes. J. Leukocyte Biol. 69:885.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    Franitza, S., O. Kollet, A. Brill, G. G. Vaday, I. Petit, T. Lapidot, R. Alon, O. Lider. 2002. TGF-β1 enhances SDF-1α-induced chemotaxis and homing of naive T cells by up-regulating CXCR4 expression and downstream cytoskeletal effector molecules. Eur. J. Immunol. 32:193.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Franitza, S., R. Hershkoviz, N. Kam, N. Lichtenstein, G. G. Vaday, R. Alon, O. Lider. 2000. TNFα associated with extracellular matrix fibronectin provides a stop signal for chemotactically migrating T cells. J. Immunol. 165:2738.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    Hulett, M. D., C. Freeman, B. J. Hamdorf, R. T. Baker, M. J. Harris, C. R. Parish. 1999. Cloning of mammalian heparanase, an important enzyme in tumor invasion and metastasis. Nat. Med. 5:803.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    Vlodavsky, I., Y. Friedmann, M. Elkin, H. Aingorn, R. Atzmon, R. Ishai-Michaeli, M. Bitan, O. Pappo, T. Peretz, I. Michal. 1999. Mammalian heparanase: gene cloning, expression and function in tumor progression and metastasis. Nat. Med. 5:793.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    Friedmann, Y., I. Vlodavsky, H. Ainghorn, A. Aviv, T. Peretz, I. Pecker, O. Pappo. 2000. Expression of heparanase in normal, dysplastic, and neoplastic human colonic mucosa and stroma: evidence for its colonic tumorigenesis. Am. J. Pathol. 157:1167.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    Butcher, E. C., L. J. Picker. 1996. Lymphocyte homing and homeostasis. Science 272:60.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  35. ↵
    Akimov, S. S., D. Krylov, L. F. Fleischman, A. M. Belkin. 2000. Tissue transglutaminase is an integrin-binding adhesion co-receptor for fibronectin. J. Cell Biol. 148:825.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    Mohan, K., D. Pinto, T. B. Issekutz. 2003. Identification of tissue transglutaminase as a novel molecule involved in human CD8+ T cell transendothelial migration. J. Immunol. 171:3179.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    Wrenshall, L. E., J. L. Platt, E. T. Stevens, T. N. Wight, J. D. Miller. 2003. Propagation and control of T cell responses by heparan sulfate-bound IL-2. J. Immunol. 170:5470.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    Dempsey, L. A., T. B. Plummer, S. Coombs, J. L. Platt. 2000. Platelet heparanase in vascular responses to xenotransplantation. Transplant. Proc. 32:972.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    Saadi, S., L. E. Wrenshall, J. L. Platt. 2002. Regional manifestations and control of the immune system. FASEB J. 16:849.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    Nadav, L., A. Eldor, O. Yacoby-Zeevi, E. Zamir, I. Pecker, N. Ilan, B. Geiger, I. Vlodavsky, B.-Z. Katz. 2002. Activation, processing and trafficking of extracellular heparanase by primary human fibroblasts. J. Cell Sci. 115:2179.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 172 (9)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 172, Issue 9
1 May 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Enzymatically Quiescent Heparanase Augments T Cell Interactions with VCAM-1 and Extracellular Matrix Components under Versatile Dynamic Contexts
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
Citation Tools
Enzymatically Quiescent Heparanase Augments T Cell Interactions with VCAM-1 and Extracellular Matrix Components under Versatile Dynamic Contexts
Ilya Sotnikov, Rami Hershkoviz, Valentin Grabovsky, Neta Ilan, Liora Cahalon, Israel Vlodavsky, Ronen Alon, Ofer Lider
The Journal of Immunology May 1, 2004, 172 (9) 5185-5193; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.9.5185

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Enzymatically Quiescent Heparanase Augments T Cell Interactions with VCAM-1 and Extracellular Matrix Components under Versatile Dynamic Contexts
Ilya Sotnikov, Rami Hershkoviz, Valentin Grabovsky, Neta Ilan, Liora Cahalon, Israel Vlodavsky, Ronen Alon, Ofer Lider
The Journal of Immunology May 1, 2004, 172 (9) 5185-5193; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.9.5185
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Innate Immunity Together with Duration of Antigen Persistence Regulate Effector T Cell Induction
  • Regulatory Roles of IL-2 and IL-4 in H4/Inducible Costimulator Expression on Activated CD4+ T Cells During Th Cell Development
  • Induction of CD4+ T Cell Apoptosis as a Consequence of Impaired Cytoskeletal Rearrangement in UVB-Irradiated Dendritic Cells
Show more CELLULAR IMMUNOLOGY AND IMMUNE REGULATION

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Public Access
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2019 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606