Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Cutting Edge: Activation of HIV-1 Transcription by the MHC Class II Transactivator

Mohammed Saifuddin, Kenneth A. Roebuck, Cheong-hee Chang, Jenny P. Y. Ting and Gregory T. Spear
J Immunol April 15, 2000, 164 (8) 3941-3945; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.164.8.3941
Mohammed Saifuddin
Department of Immunology/Microbiology, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kenneth A. Roebuck
Department of Immunology/Microbiology, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cheong-hee Chang
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jenny P. Y. Ting
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27514
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gregory T. Spear
Department of Immunology/Microbiology, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Both macrophages and activated CD4+ T cells can be productively infected by HIV-1, and both cell types express MHC class II molecules. Expression of MHC class II proteins in these cells is regulated by a specific transcriptional coactivator, the class II transactivator (CIITA). In this study, we report for the first time that CIITA expression profoundly influences HIV-1 replication. Stable expression of CIITA in Jurkat cells markedly increased 1) HIV-1 replication as assessed by the p24 Ag production and 2) luciferase expression after transfection with full-length provirus or long terminal repeat constructs. Similarly, transient expression of CIITA increased provirus expression as well as long terminal repeat promoter activity in 293 and HeLa-T4 cells. In contrast, mutant forms of CIITA did not increase HIV-1 expression. This study shows that expression of CIITA increases HIV-1 replication through a transcriptional mechanism.

Transcription of HIV-1 is dependent on host transcription factors binding to an array of cis-acting DNA elements in the 5′ long terminal repeat (LTR)3 (1, 2, 3, 4). In addition to these protein-DNA interactions, most RNA polymerase II promoters are also regulated by proteins that do not directly contact DNA. These so-called coactivator proteins are recruited to the promoter through protein-protein interactions and function as integrators in the assembly of a stable transcription complex (5, 6). Recent evidence suggests that the cellular coactivators p300 and cAMP response element binding protein (CREB) binding protein (CBP) activate HIV-1 transcription through interaction with transcriptional activator, Tat (7, 8, 9, 10). However, there is little information concerning the role of cellular coactivator in the Tat-independent activation of HIV-1 transcription.

MHC class II gene expression is activated by a specific transcriptional coactivator protein, the class II transactivator (CIITA), which directs the assembly of a stable transcription complex on class II promoters (11, 12, 13). CIITA is believed to activate promoters for MHC class II proteins, MHC class I proteins, and other proteins involved in Ag presentation such as DM and invariant chain (14, 15, 16, 17, 18). CIITA is a 124-kDa protein originally identified by Steimle et al. (19). It has an acidic N-terminal activation domain and a C-terminal domain important for protein-protein interactions (20, 21, 22). The CIITA protein does not bind directly to class II promoter elements, but interacts with sequence-specific X-box DNA-binding protein RFX5 in a yeast two-hybrid system (23). Other reports have suggested that nuclear factor-Y (NF-Y) binds to RFX to stabilize the interaction between CIITA and RFX (11, 12, 24, 25). CIITA also recruits TFIID to the class II promoter through interactions with TAFII32 (26). Recently, CIITA was shown to functionally interact with CBP, a transcriptional integrator that increases MHC class II transcription (27, 28). CBP is thought to activate gene transcription by changing promoter accessibility through its intrinsic histone acetyltransferase activity (29, 30).

Recently, we observed that MHC class II Ag HLA-DR expression in T cell lines correlated with higher HIV-1 expression (our unpublished data). In these cells, higher virus expression correlated with increased HIV-1 promoter activity, suggesting a transcriptional mechanism. Because MHC class II gene expression correlated with HIV-1 expression and because class II expression is controlled by CIITA, it seemed possible that CIITA might activate HIV-1 gene transcription in activated T cells and macrophages. In this study, we demonstrate the functional role of CIITA in the activation of HIV-1 expression and replication in several types of cells and suggest a novel mechanism by which HIV expression is regulated in target cells.

Materials and Methods

Cells and viruses

The Jurkat (TIB 152) and H9 (HTB 176) T cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA). All T cell lines were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD) supplemented with 10% heat inactivated FBS (HyClone, Logan, UT). The HeLa cells expressing CD4 (HeLa-T4) and the 293 human embryonic kidney cells were obtained from the National Institutes of Health AIDS Research and Reference Reagents Program (Rockville, MD) and were cultured in DMEM (BioWhittaker) supplemented with 10% FBS. HeLa-T4 cells were maintained in the presence of 500 μg/ml of G418 (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA).

Cell-free virus was obtained from H9 cells infected with the HIV-1MN strain (National Institutes of Health AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program). The amount of virus was quantified by measuring p24 Ag by ELISA (Coulter, Hialeah, FL).

Expression plasmids

The pNL4–3.Luc.R−E− (pNL4–3LucE−), an env− HIV-1 provirus that expresses firefly luciferase, was obtained from the National Institutes of Health AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program. The HIV-1 LTR-Luc construct was obtained from Andrea Cara (National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). The pRL-TKLuc construct, which expresses Renilla luciferase and is driven by the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (TK) promoter, was purchased from Promega (Madison, WI). The human MHC class II transactivator, CIITA cDNA (pcDNA-CIITA) and its mutants, p3FGCIITA8 STOP3 and pcDNA3 GTP2del constructs, were prepared as described (16, 20, 31), and the KEBS-NLS-L335 mutant was described (32) and obtained from Dr. Victor Steimle (Hans-Spemann Laboratories, Max-Planck-Institut fur Immunbiologie, Freiburg, Germany). The p3FGCIITA8 STOP3 mutant lacks C-terminal 41 aa (aa 1090–1130), the pcDNA3GTP2del lacks aa 461–464 (DAYG), and the KEBS-NLS-L335 mutant contains complete deletion of N-terminal acidic and proline/serine/threonine-rich region (aa 1–334). All three mutants express in the cells but unable to transactivate class II promoter; however, they do exhibit a transdominant negative effect when coexpressed with wild-type CIITA (16, 20, 32). Plasmid DNA was isolated by CsCl density gradient ultracentrifugation.

Generation of stable CIITA transfectants of Jurkat cells

To create a stable cell line that constitutively expresses CIITA, 107 Jurkat cells were transfected with 25 μg of CIITA cDNA plasmid (pcDNA-CIITA) and 1 μg of neomycin cDNA by electroporation (300 V, 960 μF) using the Gene Pulser Transfection Apparatus (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA) according to the manufacturers protocol. The CIITA-positive cells (Jurkat-CIITA) were selected by culturing the transfected cells for 3 wk in the presence of 1 mg/ml G418 (Calbiochem) and then maintained at 500 μg/ml G418. Surface expression of HLA-DR induced by CIITA was confirmed by flow cytometry as described (33).

Transient transfection and reporter assays

Cells were transiently transfected with various combinations of pNL4–3LucE−, HIV-1 LTR-Luc, CIITA cDNA, pcDNA vector, and mutant CIITA constructs using DMRIE-C or Lipofectamine reagent (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY). For Jurkat and Jurkat-CIITA cells, 250 ng to 2 μg pNL4–3LucE− or 1 μg HIV-1 LTR-Luc DNA was incubated with 3 μl of DMRIE-C reagent in 500 μl serum-free Opti-MEM (Life Technologies) for 45 min at room temperature. Cells (1 × 106) were pretreated for 2–4 h with Opti-MEM before the DNA mixture was incubated with the cell pellet for 2–3 h at 37°C. Cells were then cultured in 48-well plates (2 × 105/well) in RPMI 1640 medium with 2% FBS. DNA complexes were similarly prepared for 293 or HeLa-T4 cells by incubating 125–500 ng pNL4–3LucE− or 500 ng HIV-1 LTR-Luc DNA in the presence or absence of 0.5–5 μg of CIITA cDNA, pcDNA vector, or CIITA mutant constructs with 6 μl Lipofectamine reagent in 500 μl Opti-MEM. Cells were cultured for 24 h in 48-well plates, preincubated with Opti-MEM, and then DNA mixtures were added to the cells (100 μl/well) for 2–3 h before cells were cultured in DMEM with 1% FBS. After 48–72 h of transfection, cells were harvested, and HIV-1 expression was determined in cell lysates using the Luciferase Assay (Promega). In some experiments, cells were cotransfected with pNL4–3LucE−, pRL-TKLuc (Renilla luciferase) and CIITA expression plasmids and analyzed by the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega) to assess the specific effect of CIITA on HIV-1 expression.

HIV-1 infection of cells

The Jurkat or Jurkat-CIITA cells were infected with HIV-1MN produced in H9 cells by incubating cell pellets (1 × 106) with virus (moi 0.001) at 37°C for 2 h. Cells were then washed and cultured in 48-well plates (5 × 104 cells/well; Costar, Cambridge, MA). Six days after infection, supernatants were analyzed for the level of HIV-1 replication by p24 Ag ELISA.

Results

CIITA increases HIV-1 expression in Jurkat T cells

To determine whether CIITA can affect HIV-1 expression, we created a stable Jurkat T cell line (Jurkat-CIITA) that constitutively expresses CIITA by transfection of the CIITA expression plasmid. As expected, expression of CIITA in Jurkat cells induced high levels of HLA-DR expression (99% positive). Untransfected Jurkat cells do not express HLA-DR. Expression of other surface proteins including CD3, CD4, CD25, CD28, and CXCR4 remained essentially unchanged after transfection (data not shown).

To assess the effect of CIITA expression on HIV-1 replication, Jurkat and Jurkat-CIITA cells were infected with HIV-1MN virus. As shown in Fig. 1⇓A, HIV-1MN replicated to higher levels in Jurkat-CIITA than in non-CIITA expressing Jurkat cells with more than 5-fold greater p24 Ag detected in Jurkat-CIITA cells 6 days after infection. These data indicate that expression of the transactivator CIITA can increase HIV-1 replication.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Effect of CIITA on HIV-1 expression in Jurkat T cells. A, Jurkat T cells and Jurkat cells expressing CIITA (Jurkat-CIITA) were infected with HIV-1MN and cultured for 6 days. Virus replication was determined by measuring p24 Ag levels in culture supernatants. B, Jurkat and Jurkat-CIITA cells were transfected with 0.25–2.0 μg DNA of the noninfectious pNL4–3LucE− construct. After 72 h, HIV-1 expression was detected by measuring the luciferase activity in cell lysates. The results are shown as mean ± SE of three separate experiments (some of the SE bars were too small to see).

To determine whether expression of CIITA increases virus transcription, Jurkat and Jurkat-CIITA cells were transiently transfected with an env− HIV-1 provirus construct, pNL4–3LucE−, which contains a firefly luciferase gene inserted in place of the nef gene. Introduction of this provirus construct into cells results in the production of luciferase under the control of the HIV-1 promoter. Jurkat-CIITA cells expressed markedly higher levels of luciferase than Jurkat cells at all concentrations of transfected pNL4–3LucE− DNA (Fig. 1⇑B). For example, transfection of 2.0 μg pNL4–3LucE− DNA resulted in 17-fold higher luciferase expression in Jurkat-CIITA cells than in Jurkat cells. Luciferase expression was also higher in Jurkat-CIITA cells transfected with 0.25 μg plasmid DNA than in Jurkat cells transfected with 2.0 μg of DNA, indicating that expression of CIITA in Jurkat cells increased HIV-1 transcriptional activity.

CIITA increases HIV-1 expression in multiple cell types

To determine whether CIITA could also increase HIV-1 transcriptional activity in other cell types, 293 and HeLa-T4 cells were cotransfected with increasing amounts of the CIITA expression plasmid (pcDNA-CIITA) or vector DNA (pcDNA) along with a constant amount of pNL4–3LucE− DNA. Transfection of the CIITA plasmid increased luciferase expression up to 29-fold in 293 cells and up to 25-fold in HeLa-T4 cells, whereas transfection of the pcDNA vector plasmid did not increase luciferase expression (Fig. 2⇓A). In control experiments, 293 cells were also transfected with equal amounts of either CIITA or three different nonfunctional CIITA mutants. Wild-type CIITA enhanced HIV-1 expression, while none of the CIITA mutants increased virus expression (Fig. 2⇓B).

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Transient expression of CIITA increases HIV-1 transcriptional activity. A, 293 and HeLa-T4 cells were cotransfected with 125 ng and 500 ng of pNL4–3LucE− DNA, respectively, and 2–5 μg of pcDNA-CIITA (CIITA) or pcDNA vector plasmid. The results are expressed as fold increase by dividing the luciferase activity obtained from the CIITA or pcDNA-cotransfected cells by the activity from the cells transfected with pNL4–3LucE− alone. The data represent the mean fold increase ± SE calculated from three separate experiments (some smaller SE bars could not be seen). B, 293 cells were transfected with 125 ng pNL4–3LucE− plus 3 μg of either pcDNA-CIITA, three different CIITA mutants (STOP3, GTP2del, or KEBS-NLS) or the pcDNA vector. The results are expressed as mean luciferase activity ± SE of triplicate experiment (one smaller SE bar could not be seen). RLU, relative light units. C, HeLa-T4 cells were cotransfected with 500 ng pNL4–3LucE−, 80 ng pRL-TKLuc, and 0–3 μg CIITA plasmids. Values are shown as mean luciferase activity ± SE of three experiments (one smaller SE bars could not be seen). Three days after transfection cell lysates were analyzed by measuring the activity for either firefly luciferase (A and B) or both firefly and Renilla luciferase (C).

To determine whether the CIITA effect was specific for the HIV-1 LTR promoter in our system, transfection experiments were performed with HeLa-T4 cells where pNL4–3LucE− was cotransfected with the CIITA plasmid and the pRL-TKLuc plasmid, which expresses Renilla luciferase driven by TK promoter. As shown in Fig. 2⇑C, while transfection of CIITA plasmid into HeLa-T4 cells significantly increased luciferase expression driven by the HIV-1 LTR, CIITA had no effect on luciferase expression driven by the TK promoter. Transfection of pcDNA vector plasmid did not increase the luciferase expression driven by either the HIV-1 promoter or the TK promoter (data not shown). Taken together, these results indicate that CIITA can increase HIV-1 expression specifically from the LTR promoter in multiple cell types.

CIITA directly activates the HIV-1 LTR

The pNL4–3LucE− provirus construct used in the above experiments contained intact coding regions for HIV-1 transactivator Tat and several other accessory proteins that may have been required for the effect of CIITA on HIV-1 expression. To determine whether the effect was mediated directly by the HIV-1 LTR, or required HIV-encoded accessory proteins, an HIV-1 LTR-Luc construct, which contains the HIV-1 LTR linked to the luciferase gene, was transfected into Jurkat and Jurkat-CIITA cells, or cotransfected along with the CIITA expression plasmid into HeLa-T4 cells. Expression of CIITA increased luciferase activity from the HIV-1 LTR by 7-fold in Jurkat cells which was comparable to that of the provirus (Fig. 3⇓A), and by 20-fold in HeLa-T4 cells compared with 31-fold by provirus (Fig. 3⇓B). Transfection of pcDNA vector increased neither provirus nor LTR activity (Fig. 3⇓B). These results indicate that CIITA can directly activate the HIV-1 LTR in the absence of HIV-1-encoded accessory proteins.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

CIITA increases HIV-1 LTR promoter activity. A, Jurkat and Jurkat-CIITA cells were transfected with 1.0 μg of pNL4–3LucE− or HIV-1 LTR-Luc plasmid. B, HeLa-T4 cells were cotransfected with 0.5 μg pNL4–3LucE− or HIV-1 LTR-Luc plasmid alone or in combination with 3.5 μg of pcDNA-CIITA (CIITA) or pcDNA vector expression plasmid. Luciferase activity was measured in cell lysates 3 days after transfection. The results are shown as mean fold increase ± SE of three separate experiments.

Discussion

The observation that HIV-1 expression and replication is substantially higher in HLA-DR-positive T cell lines than HLA-DR negative cells led us to hypothesize that intracellular CIITA may enhance HIV-1 expression. We found that both stable and transient expression of CIITA enhanced the expression of HIV-1 provirus and LTR. These findings are significant because activated CD4+ T cells and macrophages, the two major cell types infected by HIV-1 in vivo (34, 35) express CIITA. Human macrophages constitutively express HLA-DR, HLA-DP, and HLA-DQ and can be further induced by cytokines, whereas T cells express MHC class II only after activation by Ag or mitogen. Resting memory T cells do not express CIITA (36), and HIV-1 expression in these cells is very low (37), further suggesting that CIITA expression is involved in virus expression.

CIITA does not bind directly to class II DNA promoter elements to increase the expression of class II genes (16, 19). However, the N-terminal acidic domain of CIITA is a strong transcriptional activator and the C-terminal domain interacts with one or more of the transcription factor(s) specific for class II promoter DNA elements including the W-, X-, and Y-boxes (16, 21, 22). CIITA specifically regulates the expression of MHC class II or related genes; however, a role for CIITA in HIV-1 expression has not previously been reported. The data herein demonstrate that CIITA expression in a variety of cell types enhances HIV-1 LTR expression, implying an interaction between CIITA and HIV-1 promoter element(s). However, the nature of that interaction is yet to be determined. It is possible that RFX and NF-Y proteins important for recruiting CIITA into the class II promoter (23, 38, 39) bind to sites in the LTR. Although RFX sites in the HIV-1 LTR have not been reported, database sequence analysis identified a putative NF-Y site within HIV-1 LTR (40, 41).

Recently, the X2-box DNA binding protein of CIITA-responsive promoters was identified as the CREB (42), and the CIITA protein was shown to recruit CBP to increase expression of class II genes (27, 28). Although the mechanism of CIITA binding to the HIV-1 promoter is not known, CREB has been reported to bind HIV-1 LTR through AP-1 binding sites (43, 44), and CBP interacts directly with CREB (29, 45) and CIITA (27, 28). Thus, CIITA could be recruited to the HIV-1 promoter via a CBP-CREB complex. CBP is also known to interact with general transcription factors including TATA binding protein (46, 47) and TFIIB (29) and facilitate chromatin remodeling and activation of cellular transcription through its intrinsic histone acetyltransferase activity (29, 30). Chromatin remodeling has recently been shown to be an important mechanism in the activation of latent HIV-1 expression (3, 48, 49, 50).

Interestingly, CIITA activated the HIV-1 LTR both in the presence and absence of the viral transactivator Tat, demonstrating CIITA can function independently of Tat or other viral accessory proteins. Thus, CIITA may play a role in the early stages of HIV infection or in the activation from latency in memory T cells. In conclusion, we demonstrated for the first time that the class II transactivator CIITA increases HIV-1 replication through transcriptional activation of the LTR promoter. Understanding the mechanism of CIITA-mediated HIV-1 expression could provide a new target for developing therapeutics or preventive measures against HIV or other viral infections.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Mark Peeples for his constructive criticism.

Footnotes

  • ↵1 This research was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant AI 31812.

  • ↵2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Mohammed Saifuddin, Department of Immunology/Microbiology, Rush University, 1653 West Congress Parkway, Chicago, IL 60612. E-mail address:msaifudd{at}rush.edu

  • ↵3 Abbreviations used in this paper: LTR, long terminal repeat; CIITA, MHC class II transactivator; CREB, cAMP response element binding protein; CBP, CREB binding protein; NF-Y, nuclear factor-Y; pNL4–3LucE−, an env− HIV-1 provirus expressing luciferase; LTR-Luc, LTR expressing luciferase; TK, thymidine kinase; pRL-TKLuc, herpes simplex virus TK promoter expressing Renilla luciferase.

  • Received December 2, 1999.
  • Accepted February 11, 2000.
  • Copyright © 2000 by The American Association of Immunologists

References

  1. ↵
    Al-Harthi, L., K. A. Roebuck. 1998. Human immunodeficiency virus type-1 transcription: role of the 5′-untranslated leader region. Int. J. Mol. Med. 1: 875
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    Gaynor, R. 1992. Cellular transcription factors involved in the regulation of HIV-1 gene expression [published erratum appears in 1992, AIDS 6:following 606]. AIDS 6:347.
  3. ↵
    Roebuck, K. A., M. Saifuddin. 1999. Regulation of HIV-1 transcription. Gene Expression 8: 67
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    Van Lint, C., C. A. Amella, S. Emiliani, M. John, T. Jie, E. Verdin. 1997. Transcription factor binding sites downstream of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transcription start site are important for virus infectivity. J. Virol. 71: 6113
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Burley, S. K., R. G. Roeder. 1996. Biochemistry and structural biology of transcription factor IID (TFIID). Annu. Rev. Biochem. 65: 769
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Orphanides, G., T. Lagrange, D. Reinberg. 1996. The general transcription factors of RNA polymerase II. Genes Dev. 10: 2657
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Benkirane, M., R. F. Chun, H. Xiao, V. V. Ogryzko, B. H. Howard, Y. Nakatani, K. T. Jeang. 1998. Activation of integrated provirus requires histone acetyltransferase. p300 and P/CAF are coactivators for HIV-1 Tat. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 24898
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Hottiger, M. O., G. J. Nabel. 1998. Interaction of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat with the transcriptional coactivators p300 and CREB binding protein. J. Virol. 72: 8252
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Marzio, G., M. Tyagi, M. I. Gutierrez, M. Giacca. 1998. HIV-1 tat transactivator recruits p300 and CREB-binding protein histone acetyltransferases to the viral promoter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 13519
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Song, C. Z., P. M. Loewenstein, M. Green. 1994. Transcriptional activation in vitro by the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat protein: evidence for specific interaction with a coactivator(s). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 9357
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Boss, J. M.. 1997. Regulation of transcription of MHC class II genes. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 9: 107
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Mach, B., V. Steimle, E. Martinez-Soria, W. Reith. 1996. Regulation of MHC class II genes: lessons from a disease. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 14: 301
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Muhlethaler-Mottet, A., L. A. Otten, V. Steimle, B. Mach. 1997. Expression of MHC class II molecules in different cellular and functional compartments is controlled by differential usage of multiple promoters of the transactivator CIITA. EMBO J. 16: 2851
    OpenUrlAbstract
  14. ↵
    Chang, C. H., R. A. Flavell. 1995. Class II transactivator regulates the expression of multiple genes involved in antigen presentation. J. Exp. Med. 181: 765
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Chin, K. C., C. Mao, C. Skinner, J. L. Riley, K. L. Wright, C. S. Moreno, G. R. Stark, J. M. Boss, J. P. Ting. 1994. Molecular analysis of G1B and G3A IFN gamma mutants reveals that defects in CIITA or RFX result in defective class II MHC and Ii gene induction. Immunity 1: 687
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Chin, K. C., G. Li, J. P. Ting. 1997. Activation and transdominant suppression of MHC class II and HLA-DMB promoters by a series of C-terminal class II transactivator deletion mutants. J. Immunol. 159: 2789
    OpenUrlAbstract
  17. ↵
    Ting, J. P., K. L. Wright, K. C. Chin, W. J. Brickey, and G. Li. 1997. The DMB promoter: delineation, in vivo footprint, trans-activation, and trans-dominant suppression. J. Immunol. 159:5457.
  18. ↵
    Wright, K. L., K. C. Chin, M. Linhoff, C. Skinner, J. A. Brown, J. M. Boss, G. R. Stark, J. P. Ting. 1998. CIITA stimulation of transcription factor binding to major histocompatibility complex class II and associated promoters in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 6267
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Steimle, V., L. A. Otten, M. Zufferey, B. Mach. 1993. Complementation cloning of an MHC class II transactivator mutated in hereditary MHC class II deficiency (or bare lymphocyte syndrome). Cell 75: 135
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Chin, K. C., G. G. Li, J. P. Ting. 1997. Importance of acidic, proline/serine/threonine-rich, and GTP-binding regions in the major histocompatibility complex class II transactivator: generation of transdominant-negative mutants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 2501
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Riley, J. L., S. D. Westerheide, J. A. Price, J. A. Brown, J. M. Boss. 1995. Activation of class II MHC genes requires both the X box region and the class II transactivator (CIITA). Immunity 2: 533
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Zhou, H., L. H. Glimcher. 1995. Human MHC class II gene transcription directed by the carboxyl terminus of CIITA, one of the defective genes in type II MHC combined immune deficiency. Immunity 2: 545
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Scholl, T., S. K. Mahanta, J. L. Strominger. 1997. Specific complex formation between the type II bare lymphocyte syndrome-associated transactivators CIITA and RFX5. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 6330
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Reith, W., C. A. Siegrist, B. Durand, E. Barras, B. Mach. 1994. Function of major histocompatibility complex class II promoters requires cooperative binding between factors RFX and NF-Y. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 554
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Wright, K. L., B. J. Vilen, Y. Itoh-Lindstrom, T. L. Moore, G. Li, M. Criscitiello, P. Cogswell, J. B. Clarke, J. P. Ting. 1994. CCAAT box binding protein NF-Y facilitates in vivo recruitment of upstream DNA binding transcription factors. EMBO J. 13: 4042
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    Fontes, J. D., B. Jiang, B. M. Peterlin. 1997. The class II trans-activator CIITA interacts with the TBP-associated factor TAFII32. Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 2522
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Fontes, J. D., S. Kanazawa, D. Jean, B. M. Peterlin. 1999. Interactions between the class II transactivator and CREB binding protein increase transcription of major histocompatibility complex class II genes. Mol. Cell Biol. 19: 941
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Kretsovali, A., T. Agalioti, C. Spilianakis, E. Tzortzakaki, M. Merika, J. Papamatheakis. 1998. Involvement of CREB binding protein in expression of major histocompatibility complex class II genes via interaction with the class II transactivator. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18: 6777
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    Kwok, R. P., J. R. Lundblad, J. C. Chrivia, J. P. Richards, H. P. Bachinger, R. G. Brennan, S. G. Roberts, M. R. Green, R. H. Goodman. 1994. Nuclear protein CBP is a coactivator for the transcription factor CREB. Nature 370: 223
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Ogryzko, V. V., R. L. Schiltz, V. Russanova, B. H. Howard, Y. Nakatani. 1996. The transcriptional coactivators p300 and CBP are histone acetyltransferases. Cell 87: 953
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    Chang, C. H., J. D. Fontes, M. Peterlin, R. A. Flavell. 1994. Class II transactivator (CIITA) is sufficient for the inducible expression of major histocompatibility complex class II genes. J. Exp. Med. 180: 1367
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    Bontron, S., C. Ucla, B. Mach, V. Steimle. 1997. Efficient repression of endogenous major histocompatibility complex class II expression through dominant negative CIITA mutants isolated by a functional selection strategy. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17: 4249
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    Saifuddin, M., M. Ghassemi, C. Patki, C. J. Parker, G. T. Spear. 1994. Host cell components affect the sensitivity of HIV type 1 to complement-mediated virolysis. AIDS Res, Hum. Retroviruses 10: 829
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. ↵
    Finzi, D., R. F. Silliciano. 1998. Viral dynamics in HIV-1 infection. Cell 93: 665
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    Wahl, S. M., J. M. Orenstein. 1997. Immune stimulation and HIV-1 viral replication. J. Leukocyte Biol. 62: 67
    OpenUrlAbstract
  36. ↵
    Chang, C. H., S. C. Hong, C. C. Hughes, C. J. Janeway, R. A. Flavell. 1995. CIITA activates the expression of MHC class II genes in mouse T cells. Int. Immunol. 7: 1515
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    Finzi, D., J. Blankson, J. D. Siliciano, J. B. Margolick, K. Chadwick, T. Pierson, K. Smith, J. Lisziewicz, F. Lori, C. Flexner, et al 1999. Latent infection of CD4+ T cells provides a mechanism for lifelong persistence of HIV-1, even in patients on effective combination therapy. Nat. Med. 5: 512
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    Moreno, C. S., E. M. Rogers, J. A. Brown, J. M. Boss. 1997. Regulatory factor X, a bare lymphocyte syndrome transcription factor, is a multimeric phosphoprotein complex. J. Immunol. 158: 5841
    OpenUrlAbstract
  39. ↵
    Westerheide, S. D., P. Louis-Plence, D. Ping, X. F. He, J. M. Boss. 1997. HLA-DMA and HLA-DMB gene expression functions through the conserved S-X- Y region. J. Immunol. 158: 4812
    OpenUrlAbstract
  40. ↵
    Heinemeyer, T., E. Wingender, I. Reuter, H. Hermjakob, A. E. Kel, O. V. Kel, E. V. Ignatieva, E. A. Ananko, O. A. Podkolodnaya, F. A. Kolpakov, et al 1998. Databases on transcriptional regulation: TRANSFAC, TRRD and COMPEL. Nucleic Acids Res. 26: 362
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    Heinemeyer, T., X. Chen, H. Karas, A. E. Kel, O. V. Kel, I. Liebich, T. Meinhardt, I. Reuter, F. Schacherer, E. Wingender. 1999. Expanding the TRANSFAC database towards an expert system of regulatory molecular mechanisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 27: 318
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    Moreno, C. S., G. W. Beresford, P. Louis-Plence, A. C. Morris, J. M. Boss. 1999. CREB regulates MHC class II expression in a CIITA-dependent manner. Immunity 10: 143
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    Rabbi, M. F., M. Saifuddin, D. S. Gu, M. F. Kagnoff, K. A. Roebuck. 1997. U5 region of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 long terminal repeat contains TRE-like cAMP-responsive elements that bind both AP-1 and CREB/ATF proteins. Virology 233: 235
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    Rabbi, M. F., L. al-Harthi, M. Saifuddin, K. A. Roebuck. 1998. The cAMP-dependent protein kinase A and protein kinase C-β pathways synergistically interact to activate HIV-1 transcription in latently infected cells of monocyte/macrophage lineage. Virology 245: 257
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    Chrivia, J. C., R. P. Kwok, N. Lamb, M. Hagiwara, M. R. Montminy, R. H. Goodman. 1993. Phosphorylated CREB binds specifically to the nuclear protein CBP. Nature 365: 855
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    Abraham, S. E., S. Lobo, P. Yaciuk, H. G. Wang, E. Moran. 1993. p300, and p300-associated proteins, are components of TATA-binding protein (TBP) complexes. Oncogene 8: 1639
    OpenUrlPubMed
  47. ↵
    Dallas, P. B., P. Yaciuk, E. Moran. 1997. Characterization of monoclonal antibodies raised against p300: both p300 and CBP are present in intracellular TBP complexes. J. Virol. 71: 1726
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    el Kharroubi, A., M. A. Martin. 1996. Cis-acting sequences located downstream of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 promoter affect its chromatin structure and transcriptional activity. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16: 2958
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    Sheridan, P. L., T. P. Mayall, E. Verdin, K. A. Jones. 1997. Histone acetyltransferases regulate HIV-1 enhancer activity in vitro. Genes Dev. 11: 3327
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    Van Lint, C., S. Emiliani, M. Ott, E. Verdin. 1996. Transcriptional activation and chromatin remodeling of the HIV-1 promoter in response to histone acetylation. EMBO J. 15: 1112
    OpenUrlPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 164 (8)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 164, Issue 8
15 Apr 2000
  • Table of Contents
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cutting Edge: Activation of HIV-1 Transcription by the MHC Class II Transactivator
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
Citation Tools
Cutting Edge: Activation of HIV-1 Transcription by the MHC Class II Transactivator
Mohammed Saifuddin, Kenneth A. Roebuck, Cheong-hee Chang, Jenny P. Y. Ting, Gregory T. Spear
The Journal of Immunology April 15, 2000, 164 (8) 3941-3945; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.8.3941

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Cutting Edge: Activation of HIV-1 Transcription by the MHC Class II Transactivator
Mohammed Saifuddin, Kenneth A. Roebuck, Cheong-hee Chang, Jenny P. Y. Ting, Gregory T. Spear
The Journal of Immunology April 15, 2000, 164 (8) 3941-3945; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.8.3941
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Cutting Edge: Blockade of Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins Sensitizes Neutrophils to TNF- but Not Lipopolysaccharide-Mediated Cell Death and IL-1β Secretion
  • Cutting Edge: Protection by Antiviral Memory CD8 T Cells Requires Rapidly Produced Antigen in Large Amounts
  • Cutting Edge: Imbalanced Cation Homeostasis in MAGT1-Deficient B Cells Dysregulates B Cell Development and Signaling in Mice
Show more CUTTING EDGE

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Public Access
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2018 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606