Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Tumor-Specific CD4+ T Lymphocytes from Cancer Patients Are Required for Optimal Induction of Cytotoxic T Cells Against the Autologous Tumor

Constantin N. Baxevanis, Ioannis F. Voutsas, Ourania E. Tsitsilonis, Angelos D. Gritzapis, Roula Sotiriadou and Michael Papamichail
J Immunol April 1, 2000, 164 (7) 3902-3912; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.164.7.3902
Constantin N. Baxevanis
Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Center, Saint Savas Cancer Hospital, Athens, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ioannis F. Voutsas
Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Center, Saint Savas Cancer Hospital, Athens, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ourania E. Tsitsilonis
Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Center, Saint Savas Cancer Hospital, Athens, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Angelos D. Gritzapis
Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Center, Saint Savas Cancer Hospital, Athens, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roula Sotiriadou
Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Center, Saint Savas Cancer Hospital, Athens, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Papamichail
Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Center, Saint Savas Cancer Hospital, Athens, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Titration of MLTC-derived responder CD4+ T cells (A) and stimulatory DCs pulsed with AWE from the autologous tumor (AuTu-AWE-DC) or whole autologous tumor cells (AuTu) in the proliferation assays (B). In B, responder CD4+ T cells were added at 4 × 104 cells/well. Values are mean ± SD from two patients in each case. Details for the proliferation assay are given in Materials and Methods.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    MLTC-activated CD4+ T cells proliferate in response to the stimulatory autologous tumor cells in the presence of autologous DCs as APC. CD4+ T cells were collected from MLTC and tested for proliferative responses in microculture plates in the presence of whole autologous tumor cells (AuTu) and autologous DCs (A) and autologous DCs pulsed with AWE from the autologous tumor cells (AuTu-AWE-DC) (B). All mAbs were added at 10 μg/ml final concentration throughout the culture period. Bars represent mean values ± SD from 19 experiments (all 19 patients were tested). Control anti-TNP mAb, isotype-matched to anti-MHC class II mAb, was included in four experiments.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Specificity of CD4+ T cells activated during the MLTC. CD4+ T cells from patients 1, 9, 5, and 6 were tested in a proliferation assay against autologous DCs pulsed with AWE from autologous or allogeneic tumor cells. Columns indicate mean cpm ± SD from triplicate cultures. Pairs of columns indicate results from the same donor obtained with CD4+ T cells in parallel cultures set up in the absence (A) or presence (B) of anti-MHC-class II mAb.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Specificity of CD8+ T cells activated during the MLTC. CD8+ T cells from patients 1, 9, 5, and 6 were tested in cytotoxicity assays for killing of the autologous DCs pulsed with AWE from autologous or allogeneic tumor cells. Columns indicate mean percent cytotoxicity from triplicates ± SD. Pairs of bars indicate results obtained with CD8+ T cells from the same patient in parallel cultures set up without (A) or with (B) anti-MHC-class I mAb.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    Cytotoxicity against autologous tumor targets mediated by CD8+ T cells collected from MLTC cultures set up using as responders whole MEAMNC (▪); CD4+ T cell-depleted MEAMNC (▴); CD14+ cell-depleted MEAMNC (•) (A); or CD8+CD4+ T cells and AuTu-AWE-DC (▪); CD8+ T cells and AuTu-AWE-DC (▴); CD8+ and CD4+ T cells pulsed with AWE (•) (B) (see text for details). Killing of K562 (▵) was marginal in both A and B. □, Inhibition with anti-MHC class I mAb. Inhibition with isotype-matched to anti-MHC class I mAb at the same E:T ratio is also shown (▿). Results are given as mean percent cytotoxicity ± SD from four experiments conducted with an equal number of patients.

  • FIGURE 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 6.

    Activated, AuTu-AWE-DC are capable of stimulating CD8+ T cells to lyse autologous tumor targets in the absence of CD4+ T cells. AuTu-AWE-DC were treated for 48 h as indicated in “Preincubation system.” Thereafter, CD4+ T cells and/or excess mAbs were removed (see also Materials and Methods) and the treated AuTu-AWE-DC were cocultured with autologous CD8+ T cells (stimulation phase). In one group (control group; ♦), CD4+ T cells from the preincubation system were added back to the culture during the stimulation phase. After 10 days of incubation, 3 rounds of restimulation were performed (restimulation phase) with MEAMNC depleted of CD4+ T cells and pulsed with AWE (MEAMNC (−CD4+) + AWE) except in group ♦, in which CD4+ T cells were included in AWE-pulsed MEAMNC. CD8+ T cells recovered from each group were then tested against autologous tumor targets and the results are expressed as mean percent cytotoxicity ± SD from five experiments.

  • FIGURE 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 7.

    Intracellular cytokine production of CD8+ T cells. AuTu-AWE-DC were preincubated for 48 h with autologous CD4+ T cells in the presence (□) or absence (▪) of anti-CD40L mAb or in plain medium (▦). Treated AuTu-AWE-DC were used to stimulate CD8+ T cells during the stimulation phase. After 10 days, cells were fixed with paraformaldehyde and permeabilized, followed by three-color staining with PE-labeled mAbs against IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-2, GM-CSF, and IL-4 and with surface anti-CD8-FITC and anti-CD3-PerCP mAbs. Columns are the percentage of triple positive (CD3+CD8+cytokine+) cells.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table I.

    HLA serotypes of the patients included in experiments assessing specificity of CD4+ and CD8+ T cellsa

    PatientbHLA-AHLA-BHLA-CHLA-DRHLA-DQ
    12.1c 335, 41W4, W71, 136, 7
    224, 3218, 51W4, W72, 35, 2
    32.1, 1935W511, 145, 10
    41, 3235, 21W65, 102, 3
    52.1, 1138W84, 75, 7
    624, 3251W11, 113
    71, 2827, 51W29, 141, 9
    81, 1944, 60W38, 121, 3
    92.1, 318W84, 135, 7
    1011, 2818, 27W2, W72, 54, 7
    • a Results from specificity experiments are shown in Figs. 3⇓ and 4⇓ and presented in Tables II and III.

    • b Patients are listed in the same order as in Figs. 3⇓ and 4⇓ and Tables II and III.

    • c Expression of HLA-A2.1 subtype was determined with the BB7.2 mAb.

    • View popup
    Table II.

    MLTC-derived CD4+ T cells proliferate in vitro in response to autologous DC pulsed with AWE from autologous but not allogeneic metastatic tumors

    CD4+ T Cell Donorsa (patient no.)AWE Donors (patient no.)
    12345678910
    1 17.96b 0.950.850.54 9.26 0.391.010.35 5.87 0.24
    20.71 12.91 0.320.671.350.561.700.921.950.76
    31.521.71 15.76 0.790.850.921.630.751.070.93
    40.630.350.97 10.59 1.321.250.761.230.690.91
    5 5.35 0.520.440.32 11.52 0.390.620.53 6.30 0.65
    60.220.950.550.780.51 10.25 0.420.400.430.44
    71.721.950.620.760.392.10 21.23 0.951.250.35
    80.520.230.170.650.720.350.17 8.90 1.900.35
    9 6.25 0.720.830.69 9.65 0.520.720.70 19.87 0.71
    101.052.010.720.360.640.570.620.920.76 13.55
    • a MLTC-activated CD4+ T cells were tested for proliferative responses in cultures with autologous DC pulsed with AWE from autologous or allogeneic metastatic tumors (see also Materials and Methods).

    • b Mean values from triplicate cultures are given as cpm × 10−3. The SD was always <15% of the mean values and thus is omitted. Values in bold indicate statistically significant (p < 0.01) proliferative responses over background values (i.e., CD4+ T cells with nonpulsed DC, which never exceeded 1200 cpm).

    • View popup
    Table III.

    MLTC-derived CD8+ T cells lyse AuTu-AWE-DC or whole autologous tumor targets but not autologous DC pulsed with AWE from allogeneic tumors or whole allogeneic tumor targets

    CTL Donorsa (patient no.)AWEb /Whole Tumor Cellc Donors (Patient No.)
    12345678910
    140b /45c,d3/21 /22/5 27 /22 2/32/31 /2 20 /23 1 /4
    21 /2 17/20 3 /10.5/12 /21/10.5/11 /12 /31 /2
    33 /25/4 25 /21 3/25 /36/54/23 /32 /15 /3
    41 /32/53 /3 34/35 3 /25/33/55 /23 /33 /6
    5 20 /17 3/51 /31/2 35 /39 2/11/12 /3 25 /20 3 /3
    62 /53/42 /12/23 /3 26/23 4/21 /35 /23 /5
    71 /10.5/12 /23/42 /35/2 32/30 3 /24 /35 /2
    83 /25/41 /10.5/22 /22/35/2 37 /42 1 /12 /2
    9 19 /17 3/65 /33/4 17 /20 0.5/11/26 /5 29 /32 2 /3
    105 /23/36/53/27/53/52/33/32 /5 22 /25
    • a MLTC-activated CD8+ CTL were tested in cytotoxicity assays against autologous DCs pulsed with AWE from autologous or allogeneic tumors or against whole autologous or allogeneic tumor targets. Results are expressed as mean percent cytotoxicity from triplicate cultures. The SD never exceeded 25% of the means and thus is omitted.

    • b Autologous or allogeneic tumors.

    • c Whole autologous or allogeneic tumor targets.

    • d Values in bold indicate statistically significant (p < 0.01) lytic responses over background values.

    • View popup
    Table IV.

    Levels of adhesion, costimulatory and MHC class II molecules on treated DCs

    TreatmentaCD54CD80CD86HLA-DR
    Plain medium6143423681064
    CD4+ T cells206980815461854
    Anti-CD40 mAb234459814351754
    CD4+ T cells+ anti-CD40L mAb8183835501006
    • a DCs were treated for 48 h as described in Materials and Methods. Results show the median fluorescence intensity. Background values are subtracted.

    • View popup
    Table V.

    Concentrations of cytokines during the stimulation phase of CD4+ T cells with variously treated AWE-pulsed autologous DCs

    Preculture SystemaCulture SystembCD8+ T Cells + AuTu-AWE-DC
    IFN-γTNF-αIL-2GM-CSF
    1. CD4+ T cells+ AuTu-AWE-DC7–45c6–2619–985–37
    2. CD4+ T cells+ AuTu-AWE-DC+ anti-CD40L mAb0.9–130.5–37–271–11
    3. AuTu-AWE-DC0.3–100.7–43–300.7–9
    • a DCs pulsed with AWE from the autologous tumor (AuTu-AWE-DC) were incubated for 48 h with autologous CD4+ T cells or as otherwise indicated (for details see Materials and Methods).

    • b CD8+ T cells were stimulated for 10 days with AuTu-AWE-DC, precultured as indicated in Column 1. Cytokines in culture supernatants were measured on day 10.

    • c The range of concentrations (in nanograms per milliliter) from four patients tested are given.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 164 (7)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 164, Issue 7
1 Apr 2000
  • Table of Contents
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Tumor-Specific CD4+ T Lymphocytes from Cancer Patients Are Required for Optimal Induction of Cytotoxic T Cells Against the Autologous Tumor
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
Citation Tools
Tumor-Specific CD4+ T Lymphocytes from Cancer Patients Are Required for Optimal Induction of Cytotoxic T Cells Against the Autologous Tumor
Constantin N. Baxevanis, Ioannis F. Voutsas, Ourania E. Tsitsilonis, Angelos D. Gritzapis, Roula Sotiriadou, Michael Papamichail
The Journal of Immunology April 1, 2000, 164 (7) 3902-3912; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.7.3902

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Tumor-Specific CD4+ T Lymphocytes from Cancer Patients Are Required for Optimal Induction of Cytotoxic T Cells Against the Autologous Tumor
Constantin N. Baxevanis, Ioannis F. Voutsas, Ourania E. Tsitsilonis, Angelos D. Gritzapis, Roula Sotiriadou, Michael Papamichail
The Journal of Immunology April 1, 2000, 164 (7) 3902-3912; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.7.3902
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Differential Susceptibility to Staphylococcal Superantigen (SsAg)-Induced Apoptosis of CD4+ T Cells from Atopic Dermatitis Patients and Healthy Subjects: The Inhibitory Effect of IL-4 on SsAg-Induced Apoptosis
  • HIV-1 Vaccination Administered Intramuscularly Can Induce Both Systemic and Mucosal T Cell Immunity in HIV-1-Uninfected Individuals
  • Osteopontin (Eta-1) and Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 Cross-Talk in Angiogenesis
Show more CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Public Access
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2019 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606