|
|
||||||||


* Division of Dermatology, University of California, San Diego, and Veterans Affairs San Diego Health Care System, San Diego, California 92161;
Discovery Research Laboratories, Shionogi and Company, Osaka, Japan; and
Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, National Jewish Medical and Research Center, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado 80206
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In atopic dermatitis (AD), unlike in psoriasis or rosacea, the expression of cathelicidin is less than expected at sites of inflammation. The decrease in expected expression is explained in part by the excess of Th2 cytokines in AD, such as IL-4 and IL-13, which down-regulate the expression of cathelicidin (7, 14, 15). A consequence of decreased cathelicidin and other AMPs in atopics is that this increases the susceptibility of the skin to infection. Cathelicidins also inhibit inflammatory cytokine release mediated by TLR4 in dendritic cells (DC), and are associated with the suppression of contact hypersensitivity (16). These observations suggest that low expression of cathelicidin may contribute to the disease manifestations of AD in two ways: their decreased expression leads to an increase in microbial susceptibility and an increase in inflammatory mediators released by DC.
The trigger for inflammation in AD is unclear but is known to follow the symptom of itch, and thought to result from trauma due to the scratch response. Small fragment hyaluronan (HA) was recently found to be released from skin following minor trauma such as would occur from scratching, and is an endogenous ligand for TLR4 as well as CD44 (17, 18). Small fragment HA is generated during inflammation or injury (19, 20, 21), and has the opposite function to high m.w. HA, which normally exists abundantly in the skin to form an essential part of the extra-cellular matrix and prevents cell activation by coating the cell surface (19). CD44, which is the most common receptor of HA, is involved in HA-induced cytokine release by forming a TLR4-CD44 complex (22).
Because both cathelicidin and HA modulate TLR4 function, in this study we sought to clarify the involvement of these molecules in development of AD using a chronic dermatitis model in mice induced by repeated hapten application, which produces AD-like skin inflammation with Th2 responses (23). We show that cathelicidin inhibits HA function by blocking the HA-TLR4-CD44 interaction, and show that the presence of cathelicidin influences the development of dermatitis in this model. These observations provide new insight into the mechanisms responsible for the development of skin inflammation in AD.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
LPS (Escherichia coli, 026:B6) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Macrophage-activating lipopeptide of 2-kDa molecular mass (MALP-2) was obtained from Alexis Biochemicals. Murine macrophage-CSF (M-CSF) was obtained from R&D Systems. Pertussis toxin (PTX) and the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor AG1478 were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich and Calbiochem (EMD Biosciences), respectively. 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Mouse MIP-2 and human IL-8 ELISA kits were obtained from R&D Systems. Mouse IL-6 and Mouse IgE ELISA kits were obtained from BD Biosciences. The mouse TNF ELISA kit was obtained from eBioscience.
Hyaluronan
Hyaluronan was prepared by the method previously described (22). Human umbilical cord HA was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and contains at wide range of sizes up to 500 kDa based on HPLC analysis. Small 1 ml HA batches were boiled for 1 h to inactivate any enzyme or protein contamination. Samples were then run on endotoxin-removal columns (Associates of Cape Cod) twice to remove any possibility of endotoxin contamination. HA preparations were free of DNA contamination, as preparations showed no peaks at 260 and 280 nm using a spectrometer.
Peptides
LL-37, mouse cathelicidin-related antimicrobial peptide (mCRAMP), KR-20, EK-20, and biotin-labeled-Pep1 were commercially synthesized and purified by HPLC to obtain >95% purity as previously described (11, 24).
Mice
Cathelicidin deficient male mice (Camp–/–) were generated in our laboratory as previously described (6) and backcrossed into the BALB/c background for seven generations. Cd44–/– (Cd44tm1Hbg) and Cd44+/+ control mice on a B6/129 background were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory. All animal experiments were approved by the Veterans Administration of San Diego Committee on Animal Use.
Cell culture and medium
Bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) were isolated from the tibia and femur of euthanized mice. Cells were seeded on a cell culture plate in RPMI 1640 medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with L-glutamine, 10% FCS, penicillin/streptomycin (100 U/ml and 50 µg/ml, respectively), 0.05 mM 2-ME, and 5 ng/ml M-CSF for 24 h. Nonadherent cells were collected and plated on 96-well plates at a concentration of 1 x 105 cells/well in the above medium. The medium was changed every other day. Experiments on BMDMs were performed on day 7. The human monocyte cell line, THP-1, was purchased from American Type Culture Collection (TIB-202). Cells were grown in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with L-glutamine, 10% FCS, penicillin/streptomycin (100 U/ml and 50 µg/ml, respectively), and 0.05 mM 2-ME. Normal human epidermal keratinocytes (NHEK; Cascade Biologics) were grown in EpiLife medium (Cascade Biologics) supplemented with 0.06 mM CaCl2, 1% EpiLife defined growth supplement, and penicillin/streptomycin (100 U/ml and 50 µg/ml, respectively). Cells were maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2.
Chronic dermatitis model
Chronic dermatitis was induced by the method previously described (23). Age-matched mice were painted with DNFB or vehicle (acetone/olive oil = 3/1) once weekly for 5 wk. Twenty-five microliters of 0.15% DNFB in vehicle or vehicle were painted on each side of both ears. Ear thickness was measured using a micrometer (Mitutoyo) before and 24 h after painting. Serum and tissue samples were obtained 24 h after the fifth painting. Mouse ears were fixed with 10% neutral formalin (Sigma-Aldrich), and embedded in paraffin by standard procedures. Sections were stained with H&E. Number of infiltrating polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) were counted and averaged in three high-power fields (magnification, x400).
Measurement of cyokine release from BMDMs
BMDMs were washed once with culture medium without M-CSF before the assay, and stimulated with HA (5 µg/ml) or MALP-2 (100 ng/ml) for 24 h in culture medium without M-CSF at 37°C. For the inhibition assay, cells were pretreated with peptides, Ab or inhibitor for 1 h at 37°C, and then stimulated. After incubation, culture supernatants were centrifuged to obtain a cell-free supernatant. Cytokines in culture supernatants were measured by ELISA according to the manufacturers protocols.
Measurement of mRNA expression in tissues
The expression of mRNA was analyzed by real-time PCR using TaqMan Gene Expression Assays (Applied Biosystems). Total RNA was extracted by TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturers protocols. Tissue samples of ear or cervical lymph node were placed in a tube with 1 ml of TRIzol and 2 mm Zirconia beads (BioSpec Products) and were beaten twice at full speed in a minibead beater apparatus (BioSpec Products) for 1 min. The cDNA was synthesized from 1 µg of extracted RNA by the iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories) according to the manufacturers protocols. GAPDH gene was used to normalize for each sample.
Measurement of MIP-2 in the ear
A mouse ear was placed in a tube with 1 ml of RIPA buffer (50 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% SDS, 0.25% deoxycholic acid, and 0.5% Nonidet P-40 (pH 7.4)) containing protease inhibitors (Roche Applied Science), and then beaten with 2 mm Zirconia beads in a minibead beater apparatus as described above, for 45 s on full speed. Beating was performed 5 times with a 5 min interval on ice between each beating to avoid heating. Tubes were centrifuged for 15 min, 12,000 x g at 4°C. The supernatant was transferred to a new tube and used as the ear extract in later experiments. MIP-2 in the ear extract was measured by ELISA as described above. Protein concentration of the ear extract was measured using a BCA protein assay kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories). The values from ELISA were corrected for protein concentration in each sample.
HA staining
HA staining was performed by previously described methods (24). Mouse ears were embedded in OCT compound (Sakura Finetek), frozen at –80°C and sectioned (9 µm thick). Biotin-labeled Pep-1 (25 µg/ml) containing 1% BSA was incubated on slides overnight at 37°C. In some experiments, slides were pretreated with Streptomyces hyaluronidase (Sigma-Aldrich) at 10 U/ml in 100 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 6.0) for 5 h at 37°C. The slides were developed using 1 h incubation with FITC-conjugated streptavidin (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) diluted 1/100 in PBS containing 1% BSA and mounted with ProLong Gold with DAPI (Invitrogen). Skin sections were evaluated under an Olympus BX51 fluorescence microscope equipped with an Olympus DP71 digital camera system and DP manager software (Olympus Corporation).
Measurement of HA in the ear
HA in the ear was measured by dot blotting using a biotin-labeled hyaluronic acid binding protein (Associates of Cape Cod) as described previously (22). The ear extract described above was dotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane using dot blot apparatus. The ear extract (2.5 µl) was diluted in 200 µl of TBS; 200 µl of this was placed in one well of the dot blot apparatus and the rest was diluted either five or twenty-five times. The HA described above was used to make a standard curve. The membrane was incubated with HRP-conjugated streptavidin (R&D Systems) and developed with Western Lightning Chemiluminescence (PerkinElmer). The intensity of dot blots was analyzed using Image-J (National Institutes of Health). The values of HA concentration were corrected for protein concentration in each sample.
Measurement of IL-8 release from NHEK
IL-8 release from NHEKs was performed by previously described methods (11). NHEKs were cultured to 70–80% confluence and treated with or without 25 µg/ml HA for 1 h, followed by stimulation with 3 or 10 µM LL-37 for 24 h. The culture supernatants were centrifuged to obtain a cell-free supernatant. IL-8 in culture supernatant was measured by ELISA according to the manufacturers protocols.
HA-mediated cell adhesion assay
An HA-mediated cell adhesion assay was performed by previously described methods with some modification (25, 26). HA solutions (10 or 100 µg/ml, 100 µl/well, 0.1 M sodium carbonate (pH 9.5)) were added to 96-well EIA plates (Corning Life Sciences) and incubated overnight at 4°C. The HA-coated wells were washed three times with PBS and blocked with 100 µl of DMEM (Lonza) containing 1% FCS for 1 h at 37°C. THP-1 cells were stimulated with 1 µg/ml LPS (Sigma-Aldrich) overnight, washed three times with DMEM containing 10% FCS, and resuspended in DMEM containing 1% FCS at a concentration of 1 x 106 cells/ml. Cells were incubated with 50 µg/ml BSA or 10 µM LL-37 for 1 h, then 100 µl cell suspension was plated on HA-coated wells, and incubated for 2 h. In some experiments, HA-coated wells were preincubated with 50 µg/ml BSA or 10 µM LL-37 in DMEM containing 1% FCS for 1 h to adjust the final concentration. Alternatively, the cells and HA-coated plates were incubated with 100 µM or 300 µM Pep-1 as described above. After incubation, plates were washed four to six times with warm DMEM containing 1% FCS by pipetting to remove nonadherent cells. The adherent cells were fixed with 10% formalin, stained with 0.1% crystal violet, and eluted with 0.2% Triton X-100. The absorbance at 540 nm in the eluent was measured by a plate reader. Data shown are the mean ± SD of the percentages of total input cells (#, p < 0.05; ##, p < 0.01; n = 3–5 per experiment).
Statistical analysis
A paired Students t test for statistical analyses and a value of p < 0.05 was considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
HA induces abundant MIP-2 release from BMDMs in a TLR4- and CD44-dependent manner (22). To determine whether the presence of cathelicidin peptides could modify HA-induced MIP-2 release from BMDMs, cells were stimulated with HA for 24 h, and MIP-2 levels in culture supernatants were measured. HA induced MIP-2 release from BMDMs in a dose-dependent and CD44-dependent manner (Fig. 1A). In the presence of cathelicidin peptides, this response was inhibited (Fig. 1B). This inhibition was seen with the mouse cathelicidin mCRAMP, which dose-dependently inhibited the HA-induced MIP-2 release from BMDMs (46, 65, and 91% inhibition at 1, 3, and 10 µM mCRAMP, respectively), and the human cathelicidin LL-37, which inhibited HA-induced MIP-2 release at lower concentrations compared with mCRAMP (96 and 98% inhibition at 3 and 10 µM LL-37, respectively). Incubation of BMDMs with mCRAMP or LL-37 alone at 10 µM did not affect MIP-2 release. Furthermore, alternatively processed peptide forms of human cathelicidin, EK-20 and KR-20, which have similar or increased antibacterial potency compared with LL-37 (11), also inhibited HA-induced MIP-2 release (43 and 38% inhibition at 10 µM, respectively), but the inhibitory activity of these LL-37-derived peptides was less than LL-37 (Fig. 1B). Pep-1, a specific inhibitor of HA (26), also dose-dependently inhibited HA-induced MIP-2 release from BMDMs, but the inhibitory activity of Pep-1 (58% inhibition at 300 µM) was at least 100-fold weaker than that of mCRAMP (76% inhibition at 3 µM) (Fig. 1C).
|
release from BMDMs showed that cathelicidin peptides also inhibited their release (Fig. 1D). Meanwhile, no cytotoxicity was observed in an MTT assay, performed by the incubation of BMDMs with mCRAMP or LL-37 alone for 24 h at 10 µM (data not shown). To examine the selectivity of inhibition of MIP-2 release by cathelicidins, we tested the effect of cathelicidins against TLR2-induced MIP-2 release. Stimulation with the TLR2 ligand MALP-2 (100 ng/ml) induced similar MIP-2 release as HA stimulation of BMDMs. mCRAMP and LL-37 did not inhibit MALP-2-induced MIP-2 release at 10 µM (Fig. 1E). These results indicate that cathelicidins selectively inhibit HA-induced MIP-2 release.
Previous studies have shown that cell activation and signaling by cathelicidins were Gi protein or EGFR dependent (8, 11, 12). To examine whether these signaling systems contributed to the mechanism of inhibitory activity of cathelicidins against HA-induced cytokine release, BMDMs were preincubated with the Gi protein inhibitor, PTX, or the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor AG1478 for 1 h, before adding mCRAMP. Interestingly, preincubation with PTX or AG1478 alone enhanced the HA-induced MIP-2 release from BMDMs. However, preincubation with PTX or AG1478 did not block the inhibitory activity of mCRAMP (Fig. 1F). These results suggest that the mechanism of inhibitory activity of cathelicidins against HA-induced MIP-2 release is independent of Gi protein or EGFR activation.
HA does not affect cathelicidin-induced IL-8 release in keratinocytes
Previous studies have shown that some cathelicidin peptides, including LL-37, can induce IL-8 release from NHEKs (11). Because cathelicidins are strongly positively charged peptides (27), while HA is slightly negative charged, we next sought to examine the possibility that cathelicidins directly bind to HA to inhibit HA function. As expected, LL-37 induced IL-8 release from NHEKs, but pretreatment of NHEKs with 25 µg/ml HA (5 times the amount required for BMDM stimulation) did not block LL-37-induced IL-8 release (Fig. 2). Furthermore, HA alone did not affect IL-8 release from NHEKs. These results suggest that the mechanism of inhibitory activity of cathelicidin against HA-induced cytokine release is not due to direct binding of cathelicidins to HA, and that the HA-induced cytokine release is cell specific.
|
CD44 is best known as a receptor for HA (28), and has been shown in Fig. 1A and in prior reports (22) to be necessary for maximum cytokine release from HA-stimulated BMDMs. Hence, we next examined whether cathelicidins inhibit the CD44-HA interaction in the human monocyte THP-1 cell line, which expresses CD44 abundantly following LPS stimulation and binds to HA in a CD44-dependent manner (25). LPS-stimulated THP-1 cells were shown to adhere to a solid plastic matrix in an HA dependent manner, and LL-37 or mCRAMP significantly blocked this binding at a concentration of 10 µM (Fig. 3, A and B). Pep-1 also inhibited THP-1 cell binding at a concentration of 300 µM, but no inhibition was observed at 100 µM (Fig. 3B). To compare the potency of inhibition, both THP-1 cells and HA-coated wells were preincubated with cathelicidins or Pep-1. However, preincubation of HA-coated wells with cathelicidins was not necessary to demonstrate inhibitory activity and simultaneous addition yielded similar results (data not shown).
|
Patients with AD have diminished induction of cathelicidin in lesional skin compared with expression in lesional skin of other inflammatory skin disorders (7, 15). Furthermore, Pep-1, a HA specific inhibitor, has been shown to inhibit the development of DNFB-induced chronic dermatitis in mice (26). In the above experiments, we observed that cathelicidins had more potent anti-inflammatory activity than Pep-1 in the inhibition of HA function. These results encouraged us to examine the involvement of a cathelicidin-HA system for the development of AD in an in vivo model using mice deficient in cathelicidin (Camp–/–).
The function of cathelicidin and HA was examined in a chronic dermatitis model induced by repeated DNFB application. This dermatitis model produces AD-like skin inflammation with high serum IgE levels in an IL-4 dependent manner (23). Camp–/– mice and wild-type (WT) mice were painted with either DNFB or vehicle on both ears once a week for a total of five applications over 29 days. The application of DNFB to mice induced a scratch response to the ear, and repeated tissue trauma. To confirm that this skin trauma from hapten exposure and scratching resulted in the expected increase in HA expression, HA abundance was evaluated by immunhistochemistry and by quantitative dot-blot analysis. HA expression increased in both the epidermis and dermis of DNFB treated mice compared with vehicle treated mice (Fig. 4A). A particularly strong HA signal was detected in the intercellular space of the dermis. In accordance with the histological observations, quantitative analysis of HA by dot blotting showed a significant increase of HA in the ear of DNFB treated mice as compared with vehicle treated mice. There were no differences observed between Camp–/– mice and WT mice in the DNFB or vehicle treated groups (Fig. 4B).
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The functions of cathelicidins and other AMPs in the host immune response are complex and dependent on the cell type and assay systems used to examine their activity (11, 31). Cathelicidins inhibit LPS-TLR4 signaling and show anti-inflammatory activity in vitro and in vivo. Cathelicidins inhibit LPS-induced DC activation, and inhibit LPS-induced cytokine release from macrophages and DC in vitro (16, 31, 32). Cathelicidins also protect against LPS-induced sepsis (27), and cathelicidin deficiency exacerbates allergic contact dermatitis in vivo (16). The suggested mechanism of inhibitory activity of cathelicidins against LPS is the direct binding to LPS or the blockage of TLR4 action in the cell membrane (16, 27, 31, 33). In the current study, we show that cathelicidins block the function of HA, known as an endogenous CD44 and TLR4 ligand. Both mCRAMP and human LL-37 showed inhibitory activity against HA function. The inhibitory activity of cathelicidins against HA was selective and not due to nonspecific toxic effects because cathelicidins did not affect TLR2 ligand MALP2-induced cytokine release, and because no significant cytotoxic effect was observed by MTT assay. Furthermore, the inhibitory activity of cathelicidins was sequence specific and independent of antimicrobial activity because the inhibitory activity of the LL-37-derived peptides, EK-20 and KR-20, which have same antibacterial potency (11), was apparently weaker than that of original LL-37. The anti-LPS activity of cathelicidin is less likely to explain the observed observations because the presence of LPS is not dependent on the development of inflammation in vivo and the in vitro assays were done under conditions with undetectable levels of LPS in the HA preparations.
Previous studies have shown that some cellular activation events attributable to cathelicidins are Gi protein or EGFR dependent (8, 11). In our experiments, the inhibitory activity of mCRAMP against HA was independent of Gi protein or EGFR activation, because pretreatment with PTX (Gi coupled receptor inhibitor) or AG1478 (EGFR inhibitor) failed to block the inhibitory activity of mCRAMP. Furthermore, we investigated the possibility that cathelicidins bind directly to HA and neutralize HA function. Precedence for glycosaminoglycan binding to cathelicidin has been reported for heparin, which can bind and neutralize antibacterial activity of LL-37 (34). However, preincubation of LL-37 with an excess amount of HA did not affect LL-37-induced IL-8 release in keratinocytes. In addition, preincubation of LL-37 with HA-coated plates was not necessary for the inhibitory activity of LL-37 against HA-mediated THP-1 cell binding. These results suggest that even if cathelicidins and HA bind to each other, the impact of binding is negligible for their function. Furthermore, the inhibitory activity of Pep-1 supports this explanation. Pep-1 can bind selectively to HA and inhibit HA function (26), but the maximal inhibitory activity of Pep-1 against HA-induced MIP-2 release was
50% at 300 µM. Compared with Pep-1, cathelicidins completely block HA-induced MIP-2 release. This suggests that the mechanism of inhibitory activity of cathelicidins is different from that of Pep-1 (i.e., not direct binding to HA).
The mechanism through which cathelicidin blocks HA-dependent activation and skin inflammation is not clear but previous studies have shown that cathelicidins can alter cell membrane structure and fluidity in a manner that inhibits TLR signaling (11, 16). The same mechanism might be responsible for the effects of cathelicidins in BMDMs. Cathelicidins might block the formation of the TLR4-CD44 complex needed for HA-induced cytokine release (22). This mechanism may also explain the inhibition of HA-mediated THP-1 cell binding because, for HA-mediated cell binding to occur, oligomerization of CD44 on the cell membrane is required (35). Blockage of CD44 oligomerization inhibits binding of HA to CD44, and inhibits CD44-HA-induced uPA expression (36). Precedence for this exists as cathelicidins block the aggregation of ICAM-1 on cell membrane in DCs (16).
CD44-HA signaling has previously been shown to have several effects on inflammation, with the nature of this effect depending on the inflammatory process and the type of HA present. For example, in a lung injury model, CD44 deficiency exacerbates inflammation associated with a lack of clearance of HA (37) and administration of Pep-1 diminished inflammation (17). The size of HA is critical for this function. HA in the 200–500 kDa range induces inflammatory cytokines, but smaller HA fragments less than 100 kDa have been reported to show different effects on host cells (38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43). The HA prepared for the experiments described herein contained a wide range of sizes up to 500 kDa based on HPLC analysis, and has overall been reported to have proinflammatory activity (21, 22). Different responses to HA can also be mediated by cell or tissue specificity due to expression of different forms of glycosylated CD44 (44), or involvement of other receptors LYVE-1 (45) and TSG-6 (46, 47). Therefore, the HA response is complex and varied depending on HA size and cell specific receptor patterns. Further work is needed to clarify the mechanism of inhibition of HA by cathelicidin, but our findings clearly show that these peptides have potent capacity to block proinflammatory mediators released by BMDM in response to HA.
The utility of repeated DNFB application as a model of AD is supported by observations in WT mice that no increase in expression of cathelicidin mRNA was observed in ears by real-time PCR, or protein by immunohistochemical analysis, with the development of dermatitis. Increased expression of cathelicidin was only detected in infiltrated PMNs (data not shown). This is consistent with the diminished induction of cathelicidin in lesional skin of AD, and with data from a recent study that has shown that the expression of cathelicidin in skin is decreased with the development of dermatitis induced by repeated Oxazolone application (48). Furthermore, this model increases IL-4 and IgE levels, but no differences were observed between Camp–/– and WT mice in this response. Thus, our findings suggest that cathelicidin is not able to modulate Th1/Th2 balance in mice and does not exert its influence on inflammation through this mechanism.
There is much evidence to indicate that HA is involved in the development of allergic skin inflammation and thereby linking our observations in BMDM with the findings in Camp–/– mice. Administration of anti-CD44 Ab reduced ear swelling in mice with contact dermatitis (49). CD44 deficiency was associated with diminished skin inflammation and low leukocyte infiltration in an allergic dermatitis model (50). Furthermore, administration of Pep-1 inhibits inflammation in the chronic dermatitis model (26, 51). In this study, we demonstrated that cathelicidins had more potent inhibitory activity than Pep-1 against HA function. We also observed that CD44 deficiency reduced skin inflammation in the chronic allergic dermatitis model, but that the features of Cd44–/– mice with dermatitis were totally different to those of Camp–/– mice (e.g., cell infiltration or MIP-2 expression). We therefore hypothesize that the effects of cathelicidin to suppress HA effects in BMDMs may partly explain the exacerbation of tissue inflammation seen in Camp–/– mice after repeated hapten exposure. Supporting this hypothesis are observations that HA expression and fragmentation are induced by inflammation or injury (20) and our current observations that HA expression was increased in both the epidermis and dermis of DNFB-treated mice. Because scratching is an important factor in development of inflammation in hapten-induced chronic dermatitis models (52), as well as in human AD (53), the increase in HA may be due to destruction of the skin barrier and subsequent accelerated production of HA. Interestingly, in our experiments, no difference in HA expression was observed between Camp–/– and WT mice despite the large differences in ear swelling. This supports our hypothesis that the lack of cathelicidin fails to inhibit HA-induced inflammatory responses rather than suppressing the tissue injury itself.
In this research, no species differences were observed in the inhibition of HA function by cathelicidin, further work using human AD skin samples are needed to clarify the involvement of HA in the development of AD. Furthermore, additional experiments are needed to fully understand the influence of cathelicidin in inflammatory responses because cathelicidin can also exacerbate inflammation in skin in models of rosacea and psoriasis (9, 13). Several mechanisms have been proposed to be responsible for proinflammatory responses to cathelicidins including activation of FPRL-1 on monocytes (12, 54) and complexing with self-DNA in psoriasis to activate TLR9 that stimulate an IFN response in plasmacytoid DCs (13). The target cell type is essential to interpretation of these effects and the in vivo endpoint can guide interpretation. For example, in our experiments HA neither affected LL-37-induced IL-8 release, nor induced cytokine release from keratinocytes. This suggests that the functions of LL-37 and HA are different in different cell types and in different diseases. Supporting this, and in contrast to the proposed model of cathelicidin-dependent TLR9 activation of plasmacytoid DCs in psoriasis, murine cathelcidin does not appear to be necessary for IFN production in the skin as no difference in IFN-
production was seen Camp–/– mice compared with WT mice after trauma (M. Gilliet, unpublished observations). It is possible that high expression of LL-37 in keratinocytes would exacerbate the development of psoriasis or rosacea, whereas low expression of cathelicidin in AD will exacerbate this inflammatory disorder. Thus, our findings demonstrate that in addition to increased susceptibility to infections, low expression of cathelicidin itself may be a risk factor of the development of dermatitis in AD.
| Disclosures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants NIH R01AR052728, NIH R01 AI052453, and a Veterans Affairs Merit Award (to R.L.G.) and NIH AR41256 (to D.L.). ![]()
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Richard L. Gallo, Division of Dermatology, University of California, San Diego, Veterans Affairs San Diego Health Care System, San Diego, 9111B, 3350 La Jolla Village Drive, San Diego, California 92161. E-mail address: rgallo{at}ucsd.edu ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: AMP, antimicrobial peptide; AD, atopic dermatitis; WT, wild type; DC, dendritic cell; HA, hyaluronan; M-CSF, macrophage-CSF; PTX, pertussis toxin; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; DNFB, 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene; mCRAMP, mouse cathelicidin-related antimicrobial peptide; BMDM, bone marrow derived macrophage; NHEK, normal human epidermal keratinocyte; PMNs, polymorphonuclear leukocyte; MALP-2, macrophage-activating lipopeptide of 2-kDa molecular mass. ![]()
Received for publication April 29, 2008. Accepted for publication July 8, 2008.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
induces functionally active hyaluronan-adhesive CD44 by activating sialidase through p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated human monocytic cells. J. Biol. Chem. 278: 37275-37287.
B-dependent mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 272: 8013-8018.
-dependent mechanism in murine macrophages. J. Clin. Invest. 91: 2368-2377. [Medline]
to induce the C-X-C chemokines mig and interferon-inducible protein-10 in mouse macrophages. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 35088-35094.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |