|
|
||||||||
Center for Immunology and Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
chain (
c)-receptor dependent cytokines are required for regulatory T cell (Treg) development as
c–/– mice lack Tregs. However, it is unclear which
c-dependent cytokines are involved in this process. Furthermore, thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) has also been suggested to play a role in Treg development. In this study, we demonstrate that developing CD4+Foxp3+ Tregs in the thymus express the IL-2Rβ, IL-4R
, IL-7R
, IL-15R
, and IL-21R
chains, but not the IL9R
or TSLPR
chains. Moreover, only IL-2, and to a much lesser degree IL-7 and IL-15, were capable of transducing signals in CD4+Foxp3+ Tregs as determined by monitoring STAT5 phosphorylation. Likewise, IL-2, IL-7, and IL-15, but not TSLP, were capable of inducing the conversion of CD4+CD25+Foxp3– thymic Treg progenitors into CD4+Foxp3+ mature Tregs in vitro. To examine this issue in more detail, we generated IL-2Rβ–/– x IL-7R
–/– and IL-2Rβ–/– x IL-4R
–/– mice. We found that IL-2Rβ–/– x IL-7R
–/– mice were devoid of Tregs thereby recapitulating the phenotype observed in
c–/– mice; in contrast, the phenotype observed in IL-2Rβ–/– x IL-4R
–/– mice was comparable to that seen in IL-2Rβ–/– mice. Finally, we observed that Tregs from both IL-2–/– and IL-2Rβ–/– mice show elevated expression of IL-7R
and IL-15R
chains. Addition of IL-2 to Tregs from IL-2–/– mice led to rapid down-regulation of these receptors. Taken together, our results demonstrate that IL-2 plays the predominant role in Treg development, but that in its absence the IL-7R
and IL-15R
chains are up-regulated and allow for IL-7 and IL-15 to partially compensate for loss of IL-2. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
or IL-2Rβ chains, develop lethal autoimmune disease (12, 13, 14). This was initially attributed to defective Treg development as these mice lacked CD4+CD25+ T cells. More recent studies using the transcription factor Foxp3 as an identifier of Tregs found that young IL-2–/– and IL-2R
–/– mice have relatively normal numbers of CD4+Foxp3+ Tregs (8, 15, 16). In contrast, both IL-2Rβ–/– and IL-2–/– x IL-15–/– mice exhibited significant decreases in Treg numbers, suggesting that IL-2 and IL-15 play a redundant role in Treg development (8, 9).
Importantly, although Treg differentiation is inhibited in IL-2Rβ–/– mice, Tregs are not completely absent (8, 9). This raises the possibility that other cytokines can also drive Treg differentiation. Along these lines, Watanabe et al. (17) have suggested a role for the cytokine thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP). Specifically, they suggested that TSLP production by Hassalls corpuscles plays an important role in human Treg development (17). Likewise, the common
-chain (
c), which is closely related to the TSLPR, has also been shown to be involved in Treg development. For example, we and others have demonstrated that mice lacking
c are devoid of Tregs (8, 15). The
c forms a component of multiple cytokine receptors including those for IL-2, IL-4, IL-7, IL-9, IL-15, and IL-21 (18). Thus, two key questions in Treg development are 1) which
c-dependent cytokines can induce Treg development and 2) whether TSLP signals are also involved in this process. In this study, we demonstrate that developing Tregs express IL-2Rβ, IL-7R
and IL-15R
and respond to IL-2, IL-7, and to a much lesser degree IL-15, by inducing STAT5 activation in CD4+Foxp3+ thymocytes. Similarly, IL-2-induced conversion of CD4+CD25+Foxp3– thymic Treg progenitors into CD4+Foxp3+ mature Tregs. IL-7 and IL-15 also induced conversion of thymic Treg progenitors into mature CD4+Foxp3+ Tregs, albeit much less effectively; in contrast, TSLP showed no activity in this conversion assay. IL-4 signaling also does not appear to play a role in Treg development as IL-4R
–/– x IL-2Rβ–/– mice show comparable numbers of Tregs as that seen in IL-2Rβ–/– mice. In contrast, IL-2Rβ–/– x IL-7R
–/– mice exhibit a developmental block which mimics that seen in
c–/– mice. Finally, the expression of IL-7R
and IL-15R
chains is suppressed in mature Tregs; this suppression does not occur in IL-2–/– or IL-2Rβ–/– mice, demonstrating that IL-7R
and IL-15R
down-regulation occurs via an IL-2/IL-2Rβ-dependent signaling pathway. Our findings demonstrate that IL-2, IL-7, and IL-15, are the critical
c-dependent cytokines that are responsible for promoting Treg development. In contrast, developing Tregs do not express the TSLPR
-chain, nor respond to TSLP, by inducing phospho-STAT5 (p-STAT5). Thus, at least in the mouse, TSLP does not appear to play a direct role in Treg development.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
IL-2–/–, IL-2Rβ–/–, IL-7R
–/–, and IL-4R
–/– mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratories. IL-2Rβ–/–, IL-7R
–/–, and IL-4R
–/– mice were crossed in our laboratory to obtain IL-2Rβ–/– x IL-7R
–/– and IL-4R
–/– x IL-2Rβ–/– mice. Mice used were on a C57BL/6 background with the exception of the IL-4R
–/– and IL-4R
–/– x IL-2Rβ–/– mice, which were on a mixed BALB/c x C57BL/6 background, and Foxp3-GFP reporter mice, which were on a mixed C57BL/6 x 129 background. Foxp3-GFP reporter mice were provided by Dr. Sasha Rudensky (University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Immunology, Seattle, WA).
Flow cytometry and FACS analysis
Mice were sacrificed and lymph node, spleen, and thymus were isolated. Five million cells were used per staining condition. Cells were first pretreated with an Ab that blocks Fc receptor binding (Clone 24G2). Cells were subsequently stained with the following Abs from eBioscience: CD4-Alexa 700, CD8-allophycocyanin-Alexa Fluor 750 or CD8-FITC, CD3
-FITC, CD25-PE-Cy7 (PE-Cy 7), or CD25-allophycocyanin. In addition, biotinylated Abs for CD122 (IL2Rβ), CD124 (IL4R
), CD127 (IL7R
), and IL21R
, were obtained from eBioscience. Abs for IL-9R
, TSLPR
, and IL-15R
were obtained from R&D Systems. Isotype control Abs for TSLPR
and IL-15R
were obtained from R&D Systems, while isotype controls for IL-9R
were obtained from eBioscience. Both the IL-9R
and TSLPR
were biotinylated according to the manufacturers instructions (Sigma-Aldrich, Cat. no. BTAG-1KT), while the IL-15R
Ab was purchased in a biotinylated form. Streptavidin allophycocyanin from eBioscience was used as a secondary reagent to reveal staining with biotinylated Abs. Intracellular Foxp3 staining was done after fixation, permeabilization, and overnight incubation at 4°C as described previously (8).
To examine whether IL-2 alters IL-7R
and IL-15R
expression on Tregs in IL-2–/– mice, we purified CD4+ splenocytes from IL-2–/– mice by MACS beads enrichment (Miltenyi Biotec). Purified cells were then stimulated with IL-2 (100 U/ml) for 4, 8, 12, and 24 h. Cells were then harvested and stained for IL-7R
, IL-15R
, and Foxp3 expression and analyzed on an LSR II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences).
Flow cytometry for p-STAT5
Single-cell suspensions were generated from isolated spleens and thymii from Foxp3-GFP reporter mice. These cell suspensions were pretreated with an Ab that blocks Fc receptor binding. Cells were then stained for the surface markers CD4, CD8, and CD25. Five million cells were then serum starved in 500 µl of 1x DMEM for 30 min at 37°C, then stimulated with either 100 U/ml of IL-2 (PeproTech), or 50 ng/ml IL-4 (PeproTech), IL-7 (R&D Systems), IL-9 (R&D Systems), TSLP (R&D Systems), IL-15 (R&D Systems), or IL-21 (PeproTech) for 20 min. After stimulation, the cells were washed with 1x DMEM to remove all traces of the supernatant; they were then resuspended in 100 µl of fixation medium from the Caltag Fix and Perm kit and incubated at 37°C for 15 min. Afterward, 1 ml of 4°C 100% methanol was added and the cells were incubated overnight at 4°C in the dark. Intracellular p-STAT5 staining was done using the Caltag Fix and Perm kit and PE-conjugated anti-p-STAT5 (BD Biosciences). Nonstimulated cells were used as negative controls.
Treg conversion assay
The conversion assay of Treg progenitors into CD4+Foxp3+ Tregs was conducted as previously described (10). In brief, CD4+CD25+Foxp3– Treg progenitors were sorted from Foxp3-GFP reporter mice (19) and placed in culture in the presence of the indicated amounts of cytokine. Twenty-four hours later cells were stained for CD4 and CD25 and analyzed for expression of these markers plus Foxp3-GFP using an LSR II flow cytometer.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, IL-7R
, IL-9R
, IL-15R
, IL-21R
, and TSLPR
on CD4+Foxp3+ thymocytes and CD4+Foxp3+ splenocytes. We found four basic patterns of cytokine receptor expression. First, the IL-2Rβ-chain was selectively expressed on CD4+Foxp3+ thymocytes (Fig. 1). This pattern of expression was maintained in splenic Foxp3+ vs Foxp3– T cells. Second, IL-9R
and TSLPR
were not observed on either Foxp3+ or Foxp3– thymocytes. To confirm that our staining for these receptors was working, we also stained peritoneal B1 B cells and CD19+ pre-B cells, which have previously been reported to express the IL-9R
and TSLPR
chains, respectively (17, 18). We detected IL-9R
expression on peritoneal B1 B cells; as expected, we also observed TSLPR
expression on pre-B cells in the bone marrow, thereby indicating that our Abs to IL9R
and TSLPR
are capable of detecting expression of these receptors (data not shown). Third, IL-4R
and IL-21R
were expressed equally on Foxp3+ vs Foxp3– thymocytes and splenic T cells (Fig. 1). Last, we observed a dynamic expression pattern for the IL-7R
and IL-15R
chains. Expression of both of these receptors was observed in CD4+Foxp3+ thymocytes, but was significantly reduced in splenic Tregs (Fig. 1). Thus multiple
c-dependent cytokine receptors, but not the TSLPR
-chain, are expressed on developing Tregs in the thymus.
|
-chain via trans presentation in vivo (21). It is possible, therefore, that our ex vivo stimulation studies may not have allowed for optimal transpresentation of IL-15 to CD4+Foxp3+ Tregs. Thus, developing thymic Tregs respond to IL-2 and IL-7, and to a lesser degree IL-15.
|
|
were the predominant receptors expressed on developing thymocytes suggested that IL-2, IL-7, and IL-15 were most likely the key
c-dependent cytokines that drive Treg development. However, given the expression of the IL-4R
-chain on developing Tregs, we examined whether IL4-dependent signals also played a role in this process. IL-4R
–/– mice show no decrease in the percentage of Tregs in the thymus relative to littermate control (LMC) mice (Fig. 4). Furthermore, splenic Tregs were also not reduced in IL-4R
–/– mice (Fig. 4). To examine whether IL-2Rβ and IL-4R
-dependent signals played a redundant role in Treg development, we generated IL-2Rβ–/– x IL-4R
–/– mice. As previously reported, IL-2Rβ–/– mice exhibited reduced numbers of Tregs in both the thymus and spleen; a further reduction was not observed in IL-2Rβ–/– x IL-4R
–/– mice (Fig. 4). These findings strongly suggest that IL-4R
-dependent signals are not required for Treg development. It is important to note here that unlike our previous studies, which used IL-2Rβ–/– mice on the C57BL/6 background, the IL-4R
–/– and IL-2Rβ–/– x IL-4R
–/– mice in these experiments are on a mixed C57BL/6 x BALB/c background. We have consistently noticed that the IL-2Rβ–/– mice on the C57BL/6 x BALB/c background mice have a more severe phenotype (i.e., fewer Tregs at an earlier age) than IL-2Rβ–/– on the C57BL/6 background. This results in IL-2Rβ–/– mice on the mixed background having a reduced percentage of Tregs relative to that seen in IL-2Rβ–/– mice on the C57BL/6 background.
|
and IL-2Rβ on developing Tregs, we predicted that these two cytokine receptors might both be capable of driving Treg development. Consistent with our previous report, we found that although total numbers of T cells are greatly reduced in IL-7R
–/– mice, the percentage of Tregs relative to other T cell subsets was not affected (Fig. 5A) (8). Thus, IL7R
signaling is not required for Treg development. However, it remains possible that IL-2Rβ and IL-7R
can act redundantly to drive Treg development. To test this possibility, we compared Treg differentiation in IL-7R
–/– vs IL-2Rβ–/– x IL-7R
–/– mice. We found that IL-2Rβ–/– x IL-7R
–/– mice showed a significant decrease in Treg numbers when compared with IL-7R
–/– mice (p = 0.009, Students t test) (Fig. 5, A and B). Importantly, the numbers of Tregs found in IL-2Rβ–/– x IL-7R
–/– mice (thymus = 195 ± 75; spleen = 686 ± 136) were comparable to that which we observed in age-matched
c–/– mice (thymus = 80 ± 22; spleen = 1500 ± 651) in our previous studies (Fig. 5B) (8). These experiments demonstrate that IL-2Rβ and IL-7R
-dependent cytokines are the only
c-dependent cytokines required for Treg development.
|
and IL-15R
are expressed at quite low levels on mature splenic Tregs. Thus, it is rather surprising that splenic Tregs are maintained in young IL-2–/– mice. To examine this further, we stained CD4+Foxp3+ Tregs from LMC and IL-2–/– mice for the expression of IL-7R
and IL-15R
. We found that CD4+Foxp3+ Tregs in IL-2–/– mice expressed significantly higher levels of both the IL-7R
and IL-15R
chains (Fig. 6). We considered two explanations for these findings. First, it is possible that, in the absence of IL-2, any splenic Tregs that express higher levels of IL-7R
or IL-15R
have a competitive advantage and are selectively expanded. Alternatively, it is possible that IL-2/IL-2Rβ-dependent signals actively down-regulate IL-7R
or IL-15R
expression. To distinguish between these two possibilities, we stained the few CD4+Foxp3+ Tregs in IL-2Rβ–/– mice for IL-7R
and IL-15R
expression. Once again, we observed increased expression of both IL-7R
and IL-15R
on Tregs from IL-2Rβ–/– vs LMC mice (Fig. 6). In IL-2Rβ–/– mice, IL-15R
expression provides no competitive advantage. Thus, this latter finding strongly suggests that IL-15R
down-regulation, and likely IL-7R
as well, is due to IL-2Rβ-dependent signals. To investigate this further, we took CD4+ splenocytes from IL-2–/– mice and stimulated those cells with IL-2. We then examined expression of IL-7R
and IL-15R
chains on CD4+Foxp3+ cells (Fig. 7). We observed down-regulation of the IL-7R
-chain as early as 8 h after IL-2 stimulation; both the IL-7R
and IL-15R
chains were clearly down regulated after 24 h of IL-2 stimulation. Taken together, these studies indicate that IL-2 dependent signals can negatively regulate IL-7R
and IL-15R
expression on CD4+Foxp3+ Tregs.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
c-dependent cytokines required for Treg development in the thymus. Four pieces of data support this conclusion. First, receptors for these three cytokines are expressed on developing Tregs in the thymus. Second, these cells can respond to IL-2 and IL-7 by inducing robust STAT5 activation. The only other
c-dependent cytokine receptors expressed on thymic Tregs are IL-4R
and IL-21R
. However, IL-4 and IL-21 did not induce STAT5 activation in CD4+Foxp3+ thymocytes and only induced minimal STAT5 activation in mature CD4+Foxp3+ splenocytes. The role of IL-15 is somewhat more complicated. We observed only weak STAT5 induction following ex vivo stimulation of thymic CD4+Foxp3+ Tregs with IL-15. This may reflect the absence of accessory cells in our ex vivo stimulation cultures that would allow for effective trans presentation of IL-15 to developing Tregs. Third, IL-2 and to a lesser degree IL-7 and IL-15 were capable of inducing the conversion of CD4+CD25+Foxp3– Treg progenitors into mature Foxp3+ Tregs. In contrast, TSLP was completely ineffective in this assay. Finally, we found that IL-2Rβ–/– x IL-7R
–/– mice recapitulated the phenotype reported in
c–/– mice which are essentially devoid of Tregs. In contrast, the reduction in thymic Tregs in IL-2Rβ–/– x IL-4R
–/– mice was no more severe than that seen in IL-2Rβ–/– mice. Taken together with our previous observation that IL-2–/– x IL-15–/– mice have significantly fewer Tregs that IL-2–/– mice, our findings strongly support the conclusion that IL-2, IL-7, and IL-15, but not other
c-dependent cytokines, can contribute to Treg differentiation in the thymus.
We also examined the role of TSLP on Treg differentiation as previous studies have suggested that TSLP plays an important role in human and murine Treg development (17, 22). Our studies rule out a direct role for TSLP in murine Treg differentiation. First, consistent with our earlier observation, IL-7R
–/– mice show no reduction in Tregs relative to non-Tregs. Second, we could not detect expression of TSLPR
on thymic Tregs nor induce STAT5 activation following stimulation of these cells with TSLP. Third TSLP was incapable of inducing the conversion of thymic Treg progenitors into CD4+Foxp3+ Tregs. These findings demonstrate that TSLP cannot play a direct role in Treg development. It remains possible that TSLP plays an indirect role by acting on other cell types that may be involved in promoting Treg differentiation. However, this function is either not unique to TSLP, or not critical, as Tregs clearly develop in mice lacking the IL-7R
-chain, which is a critical component of the TSLPR.
Although our studies demonstrate that IL-2, IL-7, and IL-15 can redundantly contribute to Treg development and homeostasis, it seems likely that IL-2 is the relevant cytokine in wild-type mice. Specifically, we found that expression of IL-7R
and IL-15R
were significantly increased on Tregs in both IL-2–/– and IL-2Rβ–/– mice. Ex vivo stimulation of CD4+Foxp3+ Tregs from IL-2–/– mice with IL-2 led to rapid down-regulation of both of these receptor subunits. Thus, IL-2 plays an important role in rendering CD4+Foxp3+ Tregs uniquely responsive to IL-2-dependent signals in wild-type mice. This most likely serves to link Treg homeostasis directly to effector T cell activation and IL2 secretion. Effector T cell IL2 production appears to be critical for Tregs to expand in step with activated effector T cells and thereby mediate effective suppression. Supporting this conclusion, IL-2–/– mice, but not IL-7–/–, or IL-15–/– mice, show signs of T cell activation and ultimately succumb to lethal multiorgan autoimmune disease. Thus, although IL-7 and IL-15 are capable of sustaining Treg populations in young mice, they are not effective at expanding these cells sufficiently during ongoing immune responses. Finally, these findings also have implications for the use of low-level IL-7R
expression to identify Tregs (24, 25) as this receptor may be up-regulated under conditions of limited IL-2 availability.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Disclosures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 This work was supported in part by a Pew Scholar Award, a Cancer Research Institute Investigator Award, a Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Scholar Award, and by National Institutes of Health Grant AI061165 to M.A.F. K.B.V. was supported by a Supplement to Promote Diversity in Health-Related Research. ![]()
2 Current address: Integrated Department of Immunology, National Jewish Medical and Research Center, 1400 Jackson Street, K512C, Denver, CO 80206. ![]()
3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Michael A. Farrar, Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota, 312 Church Street SE, 6-116 Nils Hasselmo Hall, Minneapolis, MN 55455. E-mail address: farra005{at}tc.umn.edu ![]()
4 Abbreviations used in this paper: Treg, regulatory T cell;
c, common gamma chain; p-STAT5, phospho-STAT5; LMC, littermate control; TSLP, thymic stromal lymphopoietin. ![]()
Received for publication March 19, 2008. Accepted for publication June 29, 2008.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
chain regulates the size and content of the peripheral lymphoid compartment. Immunity 3: 521-530. [Medline]
recycles and presents IL-15 In trans to neighboring cells. Immunity 17: 537-547. [Medline]This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
X. Chen, L. Fang, S. Song, T. B. Guo, A. Liu, and J. Z. Zhang Thymic Regulation of Autoimmune Disease by Accelerated Differentiation of Foxp3+ Regulatory T Cells through IL-7 Signaling Pathway J. Immunol., November 15, 2009; 183(10): 6135 - 6144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Le Campion, M.-C. Gagnerault, C. Auffray, C. Becourt, M. Poitrasson-Riviere, E. Lallemand, B. Bienvenu, B. Martin, F. Lepault, and B. Lucas Lymphopenia-induced spontaneous T-cell proliferation as a cofactor for autoimmune disease development Blood, August 27, 2009; 114(9): 1784 - 1793. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L.-F. Lu and A. Rudensky Molecular orchestration of differentiation and function of regulatory T cells Genes & Dev., June 1, 2009; 23(11): 1270 - 1282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. L. Molinero, J. Yang, T. Gajewski, C. Abraham, M. A. Farrar, and M.-L. Alegre CARMA1 Controls an Early Checkpoint in the Thymic Development of FoxP3+ Regulatory T Cells J. Immunol., June 1, 2009; 182(11): 6736 - 6743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Wu, U. Rauch, E. Korpos, J. Song, K. Loser, P. R. Crocker, and L. M. Sorokin Sialoadhesin-Positive Macrophages Bind Regulatory T Cells, Negatively Controlling Their Expansion and Autoimmune Disease Progression J. Immunol., May 15, 2009; 182(10): 6508 - 6516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Phan and M. L. Disis Tumor-Specific Th1 Lymphocytes: Modulation of the Tumor Microenvironment to Enhance Cross-Priming Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. Educ. Book, April 18, 2009; 2009(1): 199 - 202. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Wiendl and R. Hohlfeld Multiple sclerosis therapeutics: Unexpected outcomes clouding undisputed successes Neurology, March 17, 2009; 72(11): 1008 - 1015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |