|
|
||||||||


* Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520;
Department of Human Developmental Biology, Jagiellonian University, College of Medicine, Krakow, Poland; and
Department of Genetics, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A critical issue that remains unresolved regarding the DTH/CS initiation pathway concerns the identity of the B cells responsible for generating the initiating IgM Abs. B cells are divided into several populations including B-2, B-1a and b, and marginal zone B cells, and recent evidence strongly suggests the existence of additional populations (10). Our previous studies identified the B cells responsible for CS initiation as a population of B-1 cells, based on their expression of CD11b in the PerC and CD5 in the spleen (1, 2, 4, 7). However, the modern definition of B-1 cells has been expanded to include high expression of IgM and low expression of IgD, among others (see below) (11, 12), which necessitates a re-evaluation of the identity of the B cell responsible for DTH/CS initiation. Indeed, our previous studies have suggested that the CS initiation response may differ from those classically attributed to the B-1 subsets. B-1a cells, which express CD5, are typically associated with the constitutive production of polyspecific "natural" Abs (13, 14) and indeed significant amounts of hapten-binding IgM can be identified in the sera of naive mice (Ref. 15 and our unpublished observations). However, these Abs are unable to mediate CS initiation, which is dependent on previous sensitization to Ag (2, 4). B-1b cells do not express CD5 and have been shown to produce IgM Abs in response to infection (16, 17).
Following sensitization, initiating activity can be detected in the sera within only 1 day (1, 2, 18, 19). Because quantitative changes in Ag-specific IgM in the serum are too small to measure reliably, we hypothesize that DTH/CS initiation is mediated by a small subset of these Abs with special qualities, e.g., with sufficient affinity for Ag. Activation-induced deaminase (AID) is an enzyme critical to the development of mature high-affinity Ab responses because it is essential for somatic hypermutation (SHM) which drives affinity maturation (20, 21). Its activity has been best characterized in B-2 cells, in which it is associated with T cell-dependent activation of B cells in lymphoid follicles. Although CS initiation is T cell independent, AID expression and activity can be induced extrafollicularly and independent of T cell help under some circumstances, e.g., in response to LPS (22, 23, 24, 25). Because AID is central to processes that produce qualitative changes in Ab responses following immunization, AID deficiency may be a model to investigate the mechanisms of the DTH/CS initiation response. We hypothesized that CS initiation is dependent on AID-mediated SHM.
In this study, using models of hapten-induced CS, we show that CS initiation is dependent on AID, since AID–/– mice cannot mount the early initiating response to challenge. We show that impaired CS initiation is specifically due to a defect in a subpopulation of B cells that share some properties with B-1 cells. Using adoptive transfer experiments, we show that CS initiation can be transferred with a novel population of Ag-binding CD19+CD5+Thy-1int splenocytes isolated from sensitized mice. Phenotypic analysis of these cells suggests that they differ from classically defined B-1 cells and therefore may represent a separate subset that we term "initiator B cells." We go on to show evidence that these cells undergo AID-mediated SHM, most likely at some point during their development. Together, these findings suggest that CS initiation is driven by a unique population of initiator B cells that are dependent on AID for their activity.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
BALB/c, CBA/J, and CBA/CaHN-Btkxid/J (xid) mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory. AID–/– mice were originally obtained from Dr. T. Honjo (Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan) and bred onto the BALB/c background (>10 generations) by Dr. D. Schatz (Yale University, New Haven, CT). JH–/– mice on a BALB/c background (>10 generations) were obtained from Dr. M. Shlomchik (Yale University) and bred in house. All mice were housed under pathogen-free conditions. Experiments were conducted according to the guidelines of the Animal Care and Use Committee of Yale University School of Medicine.
Elicitation of CS
A 2-cm2 section of the abdomen was shaved and 25 µl of 0.5% 2,4-dinitro-1-fluorobenzene (DNFB; Sigma-Aldrich) in acetone and olive oil (4:1) was applied to the area. In some experiments, 0.1% DNFB was used to sensitize mice. Mice were then challenged 1 or 5 days later by application of 5 µl of 0.1% DNFB in acetone and olive oil (4:1) to each side of both ears. Ear thickness was measured before challenge (baseline) and again 2 and 24 h after challenge using a micrometer (Mitutoyo). For all experiments, baseline ear thickness was subtracted from postchallenge values to determine net ear thickness.
In some experiments, CS was elicited to the hapten picryl chloride (TNP-Cl; Chemica Alta) as previously described (2, 26). Briefly, a 4-cm2 section of the abdomen was shaved and 150 µl of a 5% (containing 7.5 mg of TNP-Cl) TNP-Cl solution in acetone and olive oil (4:1) was applied to the area. Mice were ear challenged 4 days later with 0.4% TNP-Cl in acetone and olive oil (1:1).
Generation of DNP-PE
DNP-haptenated R-PE (Invitrogen) was generated by a standard protocol (27). Briefly, 2 mg of PE was suspended in 0.15 M K2CO3. 2.2 µl of a 100-mg/ml solution of 2,4-dinitrobenzene sulfonic acid dihydrate (Sigma-Aldrich) was added and the resulting mixture was incubated at 37°C overnight. Free 2,4-dinitrobenzene sulfonic acid was removed by further filtration (30,000 MWCO Amicon Ultra Centrifugal Filter; Millipore). Because PE is a fluorescent protein, it is not possible to directly measure the hapten:protein ratio based on absorbance. However, DNP was added to PE in a 1000:1 molar ratio which, in our hands, results in a 5:1 conjugation ratio when BSA rather than PE is used. A relatively low haptenation level was used to try to select for higher affinity cells.
Adoptive transfer
Donor mice were either left naive or sensitized to hapten as indicated. For isolation of PerC cells, mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation and the PerC was flushed with ice-cold PBS. Cells were washed and then FACS sorted (BD Biosciences FACSAria) based on the expression of CD19 and CD11b (Abs from BD Pharmingen). Cells were resuspended in PBS and injected i.p. into recipients. In all experiments, cells were harvested from
1.5 donor mice per recipient mouse to account for loss of cells during isolation.
For transfer of splenocytes, spleens were harvested from donor mice and dissociated using frosted slides. Erythrocytes were lysed in ACK buffer (0.8% NH4Cl, 0.1% KHCO3, and 0.004% EDTA), after which cells were FACS sorted based on the expression of CD19 and CD5. When DNP-PE was used as a marker for cell sorting, splenocytes were first incubated with DNP-PE and then with anti-PE-conjugated magnetic microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec). After magnetic enrichment for DNP-PE binding, cells were FACS sorted for expression of CD19, CD5, or Thy-1 as indicated. Sorted cells were resuspended in PBS and injected i.v. to recipients. In all experiments, cells were harvested from
1.5 donor mice per recipient mouse to account for loss of cells during isolation.
FACS
FACS was performed according to protocols outlined previously (28). Briefly, PerC cells and splenocytes were harvested as described above. They were then stained with combinations of anti-CD5 (53-7.3) conjugated to FITC or PE-Cy5, anti-CD21 (7G6) conjugated to PE-Cy5.5, anti-IgD (11-26c.2a) conjugated to PE-Cy7 or allophycocyanin-Cy5.5, anti-IgM (331) conjugated to allophycocyanin-Cy7 or PE-Cy7, anti-B220 (RA3-6B2) conjugated to allophycocyanin, anti-CD23 (B3B4) conjugated to allophycocyanin-Cy5.5, anti-Thy.1 (53-2.1) conjugated to FITC, anti-CD19 (1D3) conjugated to allophycocyanin and a mixture of anti-CD3 (145-2C11), anti-CD8 (53-6.7), and anti-F4/80 conjugated to Pacific Blue for negative selection. Abs were purchased from BD Pharmingen. Noncommercial conjugates to fluorochromes were prepared as previously described (29). After washing, cells were analyzed on a BD Biosciences LSR II. FlowJo software was used for data analysis. In all cases, doublets were excluded based on forward scatter area vs height gating and dead cells were excluded by staining with propidium iodide (PI; BD Biosciences).
Sorting of cell subsets for adoptive transfer or isolation of DNA was performed on a BD Biosciences FACSAria. Briefly, cells were isolated and purified by FACS as follows: PerC B-1 cells (CD19+CD5+) were isolated from cells harvested from three to four mice. To purify splenic CD19+CD5highThy-1int DNP-PE+ cells, spleen cells from BALB/c or AID–/– mice were harvested and enriched for binding to DNP-PE using magnetic beads conjugated to anti-PE (Miltenyi Biotec). FACS was then used to further purify cells for CD19+CD5highThy-1int DNP-PE+. Activated Peyers patch B cells (CD19+GL-7+, Abs from BD Pharmingen) were purified from Peyers patch cells pooled from three or four naive mice.
Somatic hypermutation assay
The JH4 intron assay for SHM was performed as previously described (30). DNA was isolated from purified cells by phenol-chloroform extraction. JH4 intron regions were amplified using the following primers: forward, 5'-gcctgacatctgaggactctgc and reverse, 5'-cctctccagtttcggctgaatcc. Amplified regions of the correct size (
1.5 kb) were selected by gel electrophoresis, purified, and cloned for sequencing (Topo TA cloning kit; Invitrogen). All sequencing was performed at the Keck Foundation Biotechnology Research Laboratory at Yale University.
Sequences and alignments were analyzed using ChromasPro software (Technelysium) with ClustalW multiple alignment. Comparison of V(D)J joining regions was used to ensure that all sequences being assayed for SHM were unique. The first 580 bp of the JH4 intron following the V gene were analyzed for mutations by comparing them to the consensus sequence (derived from Ref. 30).
Statistics
Data in graphs are shown as mean ± SEM unless indicated otherwise. ANOVA followed by Students t test with Bonferroni correction was used for multiple comparisons. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To determine whether AID is required for the development of CS initiation mechanisms, wild-type (WT) BALB/c or AID–/– mice on a BALB/c background were skin sensitized with DNFB and ear challenged 5 days later. Sensitized WT mice developed the characteristic mild swelling of the ears 2 h postchallenge (Fig. 1A, left), followed by the greater, delayed response 24 h postchallenge (Fig. 1A, right). In contrast, no ear swelling was observed 2 h postchallenge in similarly sensitized AID–/– mice and the 24-h response was significantly blunted by 50% compared with wild type. Indeed, the response in AID–/– mice was identical to that previously observed in JH–/– mice (Ref. 4 and below), which lack B cells entirely, suggesting that the B cells responsible for CS initiation are entirely defective in the absence of AID.
|
The defect in CS initiation in AID–/– mice is due to a defect in B-1-like cells
We previously demonstrated that CS initiation is mediated by a subset of B cells with B-1-like characteristics, defined as B cells expressing CD11b in the PerC or CD5 in the spleen (1, 4). Indeed, transfer of purified B220+CD11b+ PerC cells (3) or CD19+CD5+ splenic cells (2, 7) confers initiation activity to B cell-deficient mice, demonstrating that these cells alone are sufficient to mediate initiation. To determine whether the defect in CS initiation observed in AID–/– mice is due to functional impairment of this same subset of cells, CD19+CD11b+ or CD19+CD11b– (B-2 cells) were isolated from the PerC of WT mice. These were then transferred i.p. into AID–/– recipient mice to populate the PerC with WT cells. Control mice did not receive cells. One day after transfer, recipients were sensitized to DNFB and then ear challenged 5 days later. As observed above, ear swelling 2 h postchallenge was significantly lower in AID–/– compared with sensitized WT mice and was no different from unsensitized controls (Fig. 2A, left). A small increase in 2-h ear swelling was observed in mice that received CD19+CD11b+ B cells, but this did not reach statistical significance. However, the transfer of these cells, but not CD19+CD11b– B-2 cells, permitted the subsequent development of a full delayed response 24 h after challenge (Fig. 2A, right), which is an indicator that CS initiation is functional.
|
We performed experiments to determine whether AID–/– B cells are capable of mediating CS initiation, i.e., if transfer of activated AID–/– cells from sensitized mice would transfer initiation mechanisms. With this protocol, AID deficiency is limited to B cells and any potential effects of an AID-deficient environment are excluded. Recipient B cell-deficient JH–/– mice were sensitized to DNFB (see Fig. 2C for protocol). These mice do not have initiation mechanisms, but the T cell component that mediates the delayed response is intact (4). We have previously shown that CS initiation can be restored in these mice through transfer of 1-day activated CD5+ splenic B cells (1, 4, 31) or sera from sensitized WT mice (19). The day before challenge, JH–/– mice were administered splenocytes (containing activated B cells with initiator activity) isolated from WT or AID–/– mice 1day after the donors had been sensitized with DNFB. As demonstrated above (Figs. 1B and 2B), at this early time after sensitization, the mechanisms of initiation are active in the donor mice, but the T cell component is not. Thus, the mechanisms of CS initiation and the T cell-mediated delayed component are isolated from each other, since they are generated in different mice (CS initiation in the donor, T cell immunity in the recipient). One day after transfer, recipient mice were ear challenged with DNFB and the early and late phases of the ensuing inflammatory response were assayed. Two hours after challenge, mild ear swelling was observed in mice that received WT 1-day activated splenic cells (Fig. 2C, left). At 24 h after challenge, a full inflammatory response comparable to that observed in WT mice developed (Fig. 2C, right), demonstrating that initiation mechanisms were effectively transferred to the recipient mice. In contrast, AID–/– cells were completely unable to transfer initiation mechanisms because no ear swelling was observed 2 h postchallenge and the delayed response was no different from control mice that did not receive cells.
Because adoptively transferred cells mediated a relatively weak 2-h ear swelling response noted above, a different experiment was performed to confirm that defects in CS initiation in the absence of AID directly impair the delayed response. In reverse to the previous experiments, initiation mechanisms were induced in the recipients and the T cell component was adoptively transferred from JH–/– mice. Donor JH–/– mice were sensitized to DNFB and 4 days later spleen cells (containing activated T cells) were harvested and transferred to 1-day sensitized BALB/c or AID–/– mice. One day after transfer, recipient mice were ear challenged with DNFB. As expected, 2 h postchallenge significant ear swelling was observed in BALB/c, but not in AID–/– recipient mice (Fig. 2D, left). In the absence of CS initiation, the adoptively transferred T cell-mediated response was unable to develop as demonstrated by the complete absence of ear swelling in AID–/– recipients at 24 h (Fig. 2D, right). In contrast, transferred T cells effectively mounted a delayed response in 1-day immune WT recipients.
Together, the above studies demonstrate that AID is required specifically for the development of the mechanisms of CS initiation and that, in its absence, the delayed response is significantly blunted. In addition, the defect in CS initiation in AID–/– mice can be overcome by transfer of either naive WT PerC cells before sensitization or previously activated WT splenic cells before challenge.
Analysis of B-1 cells in AID–/– mice
We previously identified the B cells responsible for initiation as B-1 cells (see above and Ref. 1). Therefore, multicolor FACS analysis was used to analyze B-1 cells in naive and DNFB-sensitized WT and AID–/– mice. B-1 cells in the PerC have been phenotypically defined as IgMhighIgDlow, with B-1a cells also expressing CD5 (11, 12). Based on this gating strategy, no differences in PerC B-1 or B-1a cell numbers were observed between naive WT and naive AID–/– mice (Fig. 3A and Table I), suggesting that development of these cells is normal in the absence of AID. Splenic B-1 cells are CD21low and CD23low, in addition to IgMhighIgDlow (11, 12). One day after sensitization, there was no measurable increase in the ratio or total number of B-1a (B220+IgMhighIgDlowCD21lowCD23lowCD5+) cells in the spleen of either WT or AID–/– mice (Fig. 3B and Table II). These results suggest that AID is not required for the development of the general B-1 cell population. Also, it demonstrates that sensitization does not result in a large scale accumulation of this population in the spleen. Therefore, CS initiation may be dependent on a small subset of activated B-1 cells that migrate to the spleen, rather than the general B-1 population, or may be mediated by a separate population that does not share the IgMhighIgDlowCD23lowCD21low phenotype of B-1 cells.
|
|
|
We set out to better characterize and identify the B cell subset responsible for CS initiation. First, we generated a DNP-PE to specifically stain B cells bearing a DNP-specific BCR. Cells were harvested from 2 days rather than from 1-day sensitized mice, assuming that an extra day would allow further accumulation of more of the relevant cells, but would still be too early for the development of T cell immunity. To purify very rare DNP-PE-binding B cells from the spleens of 2-day sensitized WT mice, cells were first enriched for DNP-PE binding using magnetic beads conjugated to anti-PE Abs. This enrichment protocol typically resulted in an approximate 10-fold increase in the proportion of DNP-PE-binding CD19+ B cells (from 1 to 12%; e.g., see Fig. 5A, unenriched vs enriched). Note that the process of enrichment did not result in a "pure" population of DNP-PE-binding B cells, which is why an additional FACS sort was performed for CD19 and DNP-PE staining to obtain highly pure Ag-specific B cells. CD19+ DNP-PE-binding cells were sorted from the enriched positive pool of cells, while CD19+ DNP-PE-nonbinding cells were sorted from the pool of negative flow through cells and then transferred to separate groups of sensitized xid mice, which lack initiation mechanisms but have functional T cell immunity (Fig. 4A, analogous to the experiments described in Fig. 2C using JH–/– mice). CD19+DNP-PE+, but not CD19+DNP-PE– cells transferred CS initiation mechanisms to sensitized xid mice, since significant swelling 2 h postchallenge was only observed in mice receiving these cells (Fig. 4A, left). This resulted in significantly greater ear swelling at 24 h (Fig. 4A, right). This experiment demonstrates that B cells with initiation activity in DNFB-induced CS can be isolated based on DNP-PE binding.
|
|
Multicolor FACS analysis of initiator B cells was performed to determine whether additional cell surface markers could be used to distinguish them from the general B-1 population. Our analysis of initiator B cells revealed that they are both IgMhigh and IgDhigh, since the surface expression of these isotypes was on the border that classically separates B-2 and B-1 cells (Fig. 5B). The majority also highly express CD21, which differentiates them from classical B-1 cells (Fig. 5C). Intermediate Thy-1 staining of the initiator B-1 population was confirmed, as labeling was higher than control, but much lower than on T cells (Fig. 5D, histogram). The enrichment process was not responsible for the phenotype of the initiator B cells since IgM, IgD, and CD21 expression was identical on the rare cells with initiator phenotype (CD19+CD5+, Thy-1int Ag binding) in unenriched samples (data not shown). Very slightly higher Thy-1 staining was the only difference observed following enrichment.
Our calculations indicate that the DNP-PE-binding initiator B cells are relatively rare, making up <0.05% of the total population of spleen cells or 5–7 x 103 cells/spleen. Indeed, injection of
1.5 x 104 cells was capable of transferring CS initiation activity (Fig. 4B).
IgMhighIgDhigh initiator B cells, but not IgMhighIgDlowB-1 cells, mediate CS initiation
It is possible that BCR stimulation during incubation with Ag (DNP-PE) during the enrichment process may inappropriately activate or desensitize the DNP-PE-binding initiator B cells (35). Indeed, the slight increase in Thy-1 expression following enrichment with DNP-PE (see above) and the fact that the CS initiation response appears to be blunted following adoptive transfer protocols compared with unmanipulated mice (cf Fig. 1A with Fig. 4B) suggests that BCR activation may be a confounding effect on our studies. A separate possible concern is that expression of cell surface markers such as IgM and IgD by initiator B cells (Fig. 5B) is somewhat heterogeneous, and it is possible that it is the cells with a more "B-1-like phenotype" that mediate CS initiation. To address both concerns, cells with initiator B cell phenotype (as determined in the previous section: CD19+IgMhighIgDhighCD5+) or B-1 cells (CD19+IgMhighIgDlowCD5+) were sorted without DNP-PE enrichment from 2-day immune CBA/J mice and adoptively transferred to immunized xid mice, akin to the experiment shown in Fig. 4B. Adoptive transfer of IgMhighIgDhigh initiator B cells, but not IgMhighIgDlow B-1 cells, effectively transferred CS initiation mechanisms (Fig. 6, left), resulting in a strong subsequent delayed response 24 h later (Fig. 6, right). This confirms that initiator B cells are phenotypically distinct from B-1 cells.
|
In mice, AID is known to mediate both class-switch recombination and SHM. We previously demonstrated that DTH/CS initiation is mediated by IgM (4, 7, 19) and therefore the mechanism by which AID contributes to initiation is almost certainly SHM. Regardless, we looked for evidence of SHM in the BCR H chain genes of initiator B cells. The JH4 intron assay is the standard assay for SHM, as evaluation of a noncoding intron segment just 3' of the V(D)J joining region avoids confounding selection factors (30). However, this assay is limited by the fact that AID activity decreases with increased distance from the transcriptional start site (20, 21). Therefore, mutation rates are not as high in the JH4 intron as they are in the upstream variable exon.
DNA was isolated from initiator B cells (CD19+CD5+, Thy-1int DNP-PE binding) harvested from age-matched 2-day sensitized BALB/c and AID–/– mice as described above (Fig. 4B). The JH4 intron region was amplified by high-fidelity PCR and cloned for sequencing; each clone representing an individual BCR gene. Consistent with a role for AID-mediated SHM in initiator B cells, combined analysis of the JH4 intron region from two rounds of experiments revealed a low rate of mutation in WT initiator B-1 cells (Table III). In contrast, no mutations were observed in JH4 intron sequences from cells with the initiator B-1 phenotype from AID–/– mice, further confirming that the mutations observed in WT cells are the result of AID-dependent SHM.
|
In B-2 cells, SHM drives the process of affinity maturation, resulting in generation of higher affinity Abs that render B cells more sensitive to lower concentration of Ag. To test the Ag sensitivity of initiation mechanisms, groups of mice were sensitized to decreasing concentrations of TNP-Cl. Four days after sensitization, all groups were challenged on the ears and swelling was assayed 2 and 24 h after challenge. Both early and late responses were clearly evident in mice sensitized with 0.008% TNP-Cl (12 µg) or greater (Fig. 7). At lower concentrations, the delayed response was not evident, suggesting that these concentrations are not sufficient to induce T cell immunity. However, the early CS initiation response was clearly evident in mice sensitized with a 240-fold lower concentration of TNP-Cl (50 ng of TNP-Cl). This clearly demonstrates the independence of CS initiation from T cell immunity. Also, because the CS initiation response is sensitive to very low amounts of hapten, it implies that Abs with high specificity for hapten are required.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previously, in our extensive investigation of the mechanisms of DTH/CS initiation, we identified the cells responsible for initiation as B-1 cells. This was based on the T cell-independent and rapid nature of the initiation response, the fact that it can be reconstituted in deficient mice by CD11b+ PerC B cells (1, 4) or CD5+ B cells from the spleens of immunized mice (1, 2), and that B-2 cells express neither CD11b nor CD5 and do not reconstitute CS initiation (4, 7). B-1 cells were originally defined as CD5+ B cells (14). The more modern phenotypic definition has been expanded to be IgMhighIgDlowCD21low and CD23low with the addition of CD11b expression in the PerC (11, 12). Because cells with this phenotype have been identified that are CD5–, the population has been split into B-1a (CD5+) and B-1b (CD5–). Our initiator B cells do not fit this more modern phenotypic definition of B-1 cells and, therefore, until their relationship with the B-1 cell populations is further clarified, we assume that these cells are a separate population. Nevertheless, initiator B cells clearly share some features with B-1 cells. Phenotypically, both (can) express CD5 as well as CD11b in the PerC, as shown here and previously (2, 3, 7). Functionally, initiator B cells more closely resemble B-1b cells since sensitization is required to induce biological activity. Recent studies demonstrated that B-1b cells produce Abs in response to infection by bacteria and are important for their ultimate clearance (16, 17). However, in contrast to CS initiation, B-1b function was shown to be independent of AID and SHM (16). B-1a cells are typically associated with constitutive production of natural Abs which contribute to the early control of both viral and bacterial infections (17, 36). Some natural Abs have been shown to bear mutations (37, 38). However, natural Abs in naive mice cannot mediate CS initiation (4).
As described above, the cells responsible for initiation reside in the PerC until they are activated to migrate to the spleen to generate Ag-specific IgM. It is not clear whether the phenotypic description of the splenic initiator B cell also applies to the cells in the PerC or whether it represents an activated state. Based on evidence presented here and in our previous studies (3), we know that cells in the PerC, like B-1 cells, express CD11b. Although it is clear that CD5 expression can be used to enrich for PerC cells with initiator activity, it may not define the population because we previously found that transfer of either CD5+ or CD5–CD11b+ PerC cells could transfer initiation (1, 3). CD5 expression may be induced or further up-regulated on initiator B cells activated by sensitization, as all B cells are capable of expressing CD5 when activated (10, 11). Thy-1 is also a marker for B cell activation (34) and may also be induced on initiator B cells after they reach the spleen. Note that our previous studies demonstrated that anti-Thy-1 Ab treatment of splenocytes eliminated the transfer of initiation activity (31, 32, 33, 35). However, Thy-1 staining on initiator B cells did not differ from B-1a cells, demonstrating that it is not unique to this population.
The contribution of AID to CS initiation is almost certainly through SHM. Since initiator B cells are IgM positive and our past studies have demonstrated that CS initiation is mediated by IgM Abs (3, 4, 7, 19), Class-switch recombination resulting in isotype switching can be excluded, as can gene conversion which is not known to occur in mice (20). The formal possibility remains that some other, as yet unidentified, biological function of AID is required for the development of CS initiation. However, our observation of low levels of AID-dependent SHM in BCR H chain genes derived from DNP-PE-binding initiator B cells suggests that this is the most likely mechanism. However, the majority of cells in our analysis did not contain mutations. Therefore, it is likely that only the cells bearing mutations resulting in BCR with sufficiently high affinity for hapten can mediate CS initiation. Indeed, the fact that CS initiation is sensitive to extremely low levels of hapten suggests that it is mediated by high-affinity Ab. Since SHM is central to the development of high-affinity Ab, this is a likely explanation for why AID is required for CS initiation.
It is not clear when AID expression and SHM would take place in initiator B cells. In B-2 cells, SHM is a process that occurs over a number of days following immunization. Due to the very rapid nature of the initiation response (active within 1 day of sensitization), it is most likely that AID expression and SHM in initiator B cells took place before sensitization, potentially during cell development. Similar to B-1 cells, initiator B cells may be dependent on a positive selection event, where BCR binding to a self-Ag is required to generate a survival signal (11, 39). Indeed, the fact that xid mice, which have defective BCR signaling, are deficient in both B-1 cells (11, 39) and mechanisms of CS initiation (1, 4, 19) suggests that this may be the case. Therefore, positive selection early in the development of initiator B cells is a likely time for AID expression and SHM to occur, resulting in an expanded repertoire capable of responding to haptens. Alternatively, SHM driven by TLR ligands has been shown to occur in the bone marrow during early B cell development and therefore mutations may occur at this stage without BCR stimulation (25). It should be noted that AID-mediated events are not necessary for the development of cells with the DNP-PE-binding CD19+CD5+Thy-1int phenotype, since they could be isolated from AID–/– mice. This system may be analogous to recent observations that human B cells with a marginal zone phenotype bear receptors that were mutated before encountering Ag (40). Indeed, there is evidence that postrearrangement mutations during development are a significant source of BCR diversity in the sheep (41), demonstrating that this is a viable mechanism for the expansion of murine initiator B cell specificities. However, because LPS can provoke AID expression in the absence of BCR stimulation (22, 23, 24, 25), SHM may also occur after initiator B cells take up residence in the PerC.
Rapid advances in FACS technology have permitted increasingly precise definitions of leukocyte subsets based on surface markers. Despite this, many aspects of the biology of these subsets remain less clear. Recent evidence suggests that B-1a cells develop early in the neonate from a unique precursor, whereas B-1b cells may develop later in life (14, 17, 42). However, the lineage(s) of B-1a and B-1b cells and their relationship to each other remain controversial (11, 14). Similarly, although B-1a cells have been associated with constitutive production of natural Abs and B-1b cells with responses to immune challenge (13, 16, 17, 36, 43, 44), there remains no agreement on functional distinctions between these subsets. In our own previous studies, we perhaps naively defined B-1 cells as B cells that are not B-2 or marginal zone B cells, using the minimal number of markers possible. Clearly, our past investigations of the role of B cells in DTH/CS initiation must now be re-read in the light of this current study using more markers to identifying a putative novel initiator B cell population. It is tempting to speculate that at least some of the differences in the literature regarding the development and function of B-1 cells are due to similar less-precise definitions of the subsets and attributes that have been attributed to B-1 cells actually represent those of initiator B cells or other as-yet undefined subsets. Indeed, the majority of studies that we cite to describe the function and development of B-1 cells also only used CD11b or CD5 expression to differentiate them from B-2 cells (16, 17, 42). Those studies that use high expression of IgM to define B-1 cells would similarly not discriminate B-1 cells from initiator B cells (16)). All of this is further complicated by the fact that B-1 cells, as defined by strict modern phenotypic criteria, are found only in laboratory strains of mice derived from M. musculus domesticus, but not other strains of mice (10), suggesting that there is heterogeneity in the phenotype and perhaps function and development of the minor B cell subsets across species. Regardless, it is clear that these minor populations have very important roles in the control of immune responses in health and disease and further investigation into defining B cell subsets and their function will become increasingly important as we seek to manipulate immune diseases through these pathways.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Disclosures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 This work was supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health (AI-59801), the American Academy of Allergy Asthma and Immunology, and the Polish Committee of Scientific Research. S.M.K. is funded by a fellowship from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. ![]()
2 Current address: One Breakthrough Way, Nevada Cancer Institute, Las Vegas, NV 89135. E-mail address: jtung{at}nvcancer.org ![]()
3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Philip Askenase, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, P.O. Box 208013, New Haven, CT 06520. E-mail address: Philip.Askenase{at}yale.edu ![]()
4 Abbreviations used in this paper: DTH, delayed-type hypersensitivity; AID, activation-induced deaminase; CS, contact sensitivity; DNFB, 2,4-dinitro-1-fluorobenzene; PerC, peritoneal cavity; SHM, somatic hypermutation; TNP-Cl, picryl chloride; PI, propidium iodide; WT, wild type. ![]()
Received for publication September 26, 2007. Accepted for publication May 19, 2008.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
14+ NKT cells and B-1 B cells. Trends Immunol. 25: 441-449. [Medline]
14 NKT cells stimulating B-1 B cells to initiate T cell recruitment for elicitation of contact sensitivity. J. Exp. Med. 198: 1785-1796.
light chains recruit T cells independent of complement. J. Immunol. 169: 4113-4123.
β T-cell receptor CD4 CD8 double-positive non-specific suppressor T cells that inhibit contact sensitivity via transforming growth factor-β. Immunology 115: 42-54. [Medline]
RII+). J. Invest Dermatol. 102: 321-327. [Medline]Related articles in The JI:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |