The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 

The Journal of Immunology, 2008, 181, 1224 -1231
Copyright © 2008 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Horne, P. H.
Right arrow Articles by Bumgardner, G. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Horne, P. H.
Right arrow Articles by Bumgardner, G. L.

Critical Role of Effector Macrophages in Mediating CD4-Dependent Alloimmune Injury of Transplanted Liver Parenchymal Cells1

Phillip H. Horne*,{dagger}, Jason M. Zimmerer*, Mason G. Fisher*, Keri E. Lunsford{dagger}, Gyongyi Nadasdy{ddagger}, Tibor Nadasdy{ddagger}, Nico van Rooijen§ and Ginny L. Bumgardner2,*

* Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Transplant Center, {dagger} Integrated Biomedical Science Graduate Program, College of Medicine, and {ddagger} Department of Pathology, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210; and § Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Vrije University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
Despite the recognition that humoral rejection is an important cause of allograft injury, the mechanism of Ab-mediated injury to allograft parenchyma is not well understood. We used a well-characterized murine hepatocellular allograft model to determine the mechanism of Ab-mediated destruction of transplanted liver parenchymal cells. In this model, allogeneic hepatocytes are transplanted into CD8-deficient hosts to focus on CD4-dependent, alloantibody-mediated rejection. Host serum alloantibody levels correlated with in vivo allospecific cytotoxic activity in CD8 knockout hepatocyte rejector mice. Host macrophage depletion, but not CD4+ T cell, NK cell, neutrophil, or complement depletion, inhibited in vivo allocytotoxicity. Recipient macrophage deficiency delayed CD4-dependent hepatocyte rejection and inhibited in vivo allocytotoxicity without influencing alloantibody production. Furthermore, hepatocyte coincubation with alloantibody and macrophages resulted in Ab-dependent hepatocellular cytotoxicity in vitro. These studies are consistent with a paradigm of acute humoral rejection in which CD4+ T cell-dependent alloantibody production results in the targeting of transplanted allogeneic parenchymal cells for macrophage-mediated cytotoxic immune damage. Consequently, strategies to eliminate recipient macrophages during CD4-dependent rejection pathway may prolong allograft survival.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
Acute Ab-mediated allograft rejection is an important cause of solid organ graft dysfunction and failure. Complement-split product deposition at the graft site has become an important component of the pathologic diagnostic criteria for Ab-mediated graft damage (1). C4d deposition correlates with the occurrence of renal (2, 3, 4, 5), lung (6, 7), liver (8, 9, 10), and cardiac (11, 12, 13) allograft loss, suggesting that complement is a key mediator of graft tissue destruction. The concurrent presence of innate and adaptive immune cellular infiltrates at the graft site reported in many studies in which complement deposition is observed and humoral immunity is operative (14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20), as well as known Ab-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC)3 mechanisms (21), bring into question the role of graft-infiltrating cells in alloantibody-mediated damage to the graft parenchyma.

We have previously reported that liver parenchymal cell (hepatocellular) allografts initiate a robust humoral immune response (especially when CD8+ T cell-mediated immunity is perturbed) which is sufficient to mediate hepatocyte rejection in a dose-dependent fashion. Acute rejection in CD8-deficient hosts is CD4+ T cell dependent, B cell dependent, and allospecific (22). The histology associated with alloantibody-mediated hepatocellular allograft rejection is remarkable for absence of injury to the native liver tissue. Hepatocellular allografts are distinguished from solid organ allografts by the absence of donor endothelium intervening between the vasculature and graft parenchymal cells. Consequently, the target of humoral alloimmunity after hepatocyte transplant is not donor endothelium, suggesting that alloantibody is able to target donor liver parenchymal cells specifically and clear them efficiently. A possible mechanism for this selective targeting and destruction of donor parenchymal cells include complement activation and resultant membrane attack complex-mediated lysis of the donor cells. Another mechanism, ADCC, involves other immune cell mediators, such as NK cells, macrophages, and neutrophils. These mechanisms are relevant to clinical cell (islet (23, 24) and bone marrow (25)) and solid organ allografts in which alloantibodies are a known barrier to early and long-term graft survival (14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20).

The current studies were performed to determine the in vivo mechanism of alloantibody-mediated damage of transplanted liver parenchymal cells. We found that host macrophages, and not complement, CD4+ T cells, NK cells, or neutrophils, were critical for in vivo-allospecific cytotoxic effector function generated during CD4-dependent Ab-mediated hepatocyte allograft rejection (CD8 KO recipients). The role of host macrophages as cellular effectors of Ab-mediated graft rejection was supported using three experimental approaches including the CD8-depleted macrophage "deficient" op/op host, macrophage depletion of a CD8 KO host, and an in vitro cytotoxicity assay in which hepatocellular cytotoxicity was determined in the presence of alloantibody, macrophages, or both alloantibody and macrophages. Therapies designed to limit or block interactions between alloantibody and host macrophages could prevent graft injury by humoral mechanisms which can occur despite effective control of T cell-mediated rejection responses.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
Experimental animals

FVB/N (H-2q; Taconic Farms), CD8 KO (H-2b, C57BL/6Cd8atm1Mak; The Jackson Laboratory), and op/op osteopetrosis (B6C3Fe a/a-Csf1op/Csf1op, H-2b, a gift from Dr. C. Marsh, Ohio State University) mouse strains were used in this study. Transgenic FVB/N mice expressing human {alpha}-1- antitrypsin (hA1AT-FVB/N, H-2q) were the source of "donor" hepatocytes. This strain was created, bred, and maintained at the Biotechnology Center and Transgenic Animal Facility (Ohio State University) (26, 27). Mice that were 6–9 wk of age were used in the experiments. All experiments were performed in compliance with the guidelines of the Institutional Laboratory Animal Care and Use Committee of the Ohio State University (Protocol 2007A0071).

Hepatocyte isolation and purification

Hepatocyte isolation and purification was performed as described previously (26, 27). Briefly, the liver was perfused with 0.09% EGTA-containing calcium-free salt solution followed by a 0.05% collagenase solution (type IV; Sigma-Aldrich) in 1% albumin. Liver tissue was minced, filtered, and washed in RPMI 1640 with 10% FBS. Hepatocytes were purified on a 50% Percoll gradient (Pharmacia Biotech). Hepatocyte viability and purity were both consistently >99%.

Hepatocyte transplantation and monitoring of hepatocyte graft function

Donor hepatocytes were retrieved from transgenic mice expressing hA1AT under control of the liver-specific hA1AT promoter and transplanted into recipients by intrasplenic injection with circulation of donor hepatocytes to the host liver, as previously described (27). Graft function was determined by detection of the secreted transgenic reporter product hA1AT in serial recipient serum samples. Graft survival was reflected by stable and persistent serum hA1AT levels, whereas graft rejection was reflected by rapidly decreasing serum hA1AT (usually over 5–7 days) to undetectable levels (<0.5 µg/ml) (26, 27).

In vivo host treatment

Recipients were depleted of circulating CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, NK cells (NK1.1+), or neutrophil (Ly6G+) cells using mAbs. Anti-CD4 (GK1.5), anti-CD8 (53.6.72), and anti-Ly6G (RB6-8C5) were obtained from Bioexpress Cell Culture Services. Anti-NK1.1 (PK136) mAb was purified from ascites produced in pristane-primed mice. Hepatocyte recipients (as well as nontransplanted control mice) were depleted of CD4+ T cells, NK cells, or neutrophils by i.p. treatment with 250 µg of anti-CD4, 300 µg of anti-NK1.1, or 100 µg of anti-Ly6G mAbs, respectively, 48 h before the in vivo cytotoxicity assay. Depletion was confirmed through flow cytometric analysis of recipient splenocytes. MCSF–/– (op/op) and wild-type littermate recipient mice were depleted of CD8+ T cells using anti-CD8 mAb (300 µg i.p.) on days –4, –2, 7, and 14 relative to hepatocyte transplant. Depletion was confirmed through flow cytometric analysis of PBLs.

Recipient macrophages were depleted through i.p. injection of liposome-encapsulated clodronate. To determine the contribution of host macrophages to in vivo cytotoxic effector function, hepatocyte recipients were depleted of host macrophages (0.2 ml of liposome clodronate i.p.) 48 h before the in vivo cytotoxicity assay. To determine the role of host macrophages in the effector phase of hepatocyte rejection, CD8 KO hepatocyte recipients were depleted of host macrophages (0.2 ml of liposome clodronate i.p.) on days 5, 9, 13, 17, and 21 posttransplant while monitoring graft survival. Liposome clodronate and control liposomes containing only PBS were prepared as previously described (28). Clodronate was a gift from Roche Diagnostics. Depletion of macrophages was confirmed through flow cytometric analysis of F4/80+ (CI:A3-1, Caltag Laboratories) cells in recipient splenocytes.

Host complement was depleted through i.p. treatment of 25 µg of cobra venom factor (Naja melanoleuca; Venom Supplies). Host depletion of complement was confirmed through reduction in hemolysis of Ab-sensitized sheep erythrocytes in gelatin Veronal buffer according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Sigma-Aldrich).

In vivo cytotoxicity assay

An in vivo cytotoxicity assay, initially designed to detect cytolytic T cell function in vivo through clearance of CFSE-stained allogeneic and syngeneic target cells, has been previously described (29). Syngeneic target splenocytes from C57BL/6 mice were stained with 0.2 µM CFSElow (Molecular Probes). Allogeneic target splenocytes from FVB/N mice were stained with 2.0 µM CFSE (CFSEhigh). Equal numbers of CFSE-labeled syngeneic and allogeneic target splenocytes (20 x 106 each, mixed 1:1) were injected into the tail veins of allograft recipient and control untransplanted mice. Eighteen hours after CFSE-labeled target cell injection, splenocytes from hepatocyte recipients were retrieved and analyzed by flow cytometry, gating on CFSE-positive splenocytes. Percent allospecific cytotoxicity was calculated using the following formula where no. of CFSEhigh represents the number of allogeneic target cells and no. of CFSElow represents the number of syngeneic target cells recovered from either untransplanted or experimental mice:

Formula

Donor-reactive Ab

Host serum was assayed for the presence of donor-specific IgG alloantibodies by incubating serum (diluted 1/10) obtained 14 days after transplant with FVB/N target splenocytes followed by incubation with FITC-conjugated goat F(ab')2 anti-mouse IgG Fc (Organon Teknika) and analysis by FACS. Alloantibody level is represented as the percentage of target cells labeled by secondary fluorescent Ab as described previously (22).

Immunohistochemistry

Tissue was snap frozen in liquid nitrogen, fixed in cold acetone, quenched in hydrogen peroxide solution to block endogenous peroxidase activity, and endogenous biotin was blocked using a biotin-blocking system (DakoCytomation). For detection of donor hepatocytes engrafted within recipient liver parenchyma, the polyclonal rabbit anti-human {alpha}-1-antitrypsin Ab was used (DakoCytomation). Biotinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L; Vector Laboratories BA-5000) secondary Ab (1/200) was used before the Vectastain Elite ABC Kit (Vector Laboratories PK-7100) for detection. Liver macrophages (F4/80+ cells) were detected with rat anti-mouse F4/80 Ab (1/25; Serotec) and goat anti-rat IgG, HRP (mouse adsorbed, 1/25; Serotec). Both anti-hA1AT or anti-F4/80 Abs were visualized with liquid diaminobenzidine-positive substrate (DakoCytomation). Slides were counterstained with Richard-Allen hematoxylin and the histology was assessed by blinded analysis.

In vitro cytotoxicity assay

Purified mouse FVB/N allogeneic hepatocytes (H-2q) were incubated for 30 min (37°C) with serum from naive or rejecter CD8 KO mice (H-2b; 14 days after hepatocyte transplantation). Aliquots of hepatocytes were then added to 12-well plates with 10% FBS medium. Macrophages were harvested from C57BL/6 mice (H-2b) as previously described (30). Briefly, 1 ml of 4% Brewer thioglycolate medium was injected into the peritoneal cavity of wild-type mice. Five days later, the peritoneal cavity was washed with 10 ml of PBS. Subsequently, the peritoneal exudate cells were plated for 1 h and the adherent macrophages were collected (85- 95% purity by CD68 flow cytometry; data not shown). Macrophages were then added to the wells at various E:T ratios (10:1 or 40:1). Following the addition of macrophages, hepatocytes were cultured for an additional 8 h at 37°C. Supernatants were then collected and analyzed for alanine transaminase (ALT) release (Department of Clinical Laboratories, Ohio State University).

Statistical analysis

Graft survival between experimental groups was compared using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank statistics (SPSS). Other statistical calculations were performed using Student’s t test to analyze differences between experimental groups. A value of p < 0.05 was considered significant.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
Recipient serum alloantibody levels correlate with the magnitude of in vivo cytotoxic effector function in CD8 KO hepatocyte rejector mice

We have previously reported that in the absence of host CD8+ T cells (CD8 KO, CD8+ T cell-depleted C57BL/6, and SCID hosts reconstituted with CD8-depleted splenocytes), rejection of hepatocellular allografts is CD4+ T cell dependent and mediated by alloantibody (22, 26). These studies prompted further analysis of the mechanism of Ab-mediated allogeneic parenchymal cell damage. Untreated CD8 KO (H-2b) recipients were transplanted with FVB/N (H-2q) hepatocellular allografts and monitored for graft rejection which occurred, as in previous studies, with median survival time (MST) of 14 days (26). Following rejection, the hosts were tested for in vivo cytotoxic effector function using an in vivo cytotoxicity assay by the adoptive transfer of syngeneic and allogeneic target splenocytes. This assay was originally designed to detect CD8+ T cell- or NK cell-mediated cytotoxic activity in vivo (31, 32). Despite the absence of the CD8+ cytotoxic T cell subset, CD8 KO hepatocellular allograft rejector mice developed potent cytotoxic effector activity (n = 16; Fig. 1). All CD8 KO hepatocyte rejector mice generated detectable levels of alloantibody in recipient serum. To determine whether this cytotoxic activity was mediated by immune cells capable of cytotoxic effector function, such as CD4+ T cells or NK cells, CD8 KO hepatocyte hosts that had rejected hepatocyte allografts were depleted of CD4+ T cells (GK1.5) and/or NK cells (PK136) 48 h before the in vivo cytotoxicity assay. The high magnitude cytotoxic activity generated in CD8 KO transplant rejectors was not significantly decreased in the absence of host CD4+ T cells (n = 19), NK cells (n = 4), or both CD4+ T cells and NK cells (n = 5), in comparison to nondepleted rejectors (p, NS; Fig. 1). We noted a small decrease in cytotoxicity with CD4 depletion, although the effect was not statistically significant. Nevertheless, in subsequent cytotoxicity experiments, all hosts were depleted of CD4+ T cells to remove any potential cytotoxic contributions from CD4+ T cells and to clarify interpretation of data.


Figure 1
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 1. CD8 KO rejector mice have high-magnitude in vivo cytotoxic effector function which is not mediated by CD4+ T or NK cellular effectors. FVB/N (H-2q) hepatocytes were transplanted into untreated CD8 KO (H-2b) mice. After graft rejection occurred (MST = 14 days), CD8 KO hosts were left untreated (no Rx), or were depleted of CD4+ T cells (CD8 KO anti-CD4), NK cells (CD8 KO anti-NK1.1), or both CD4+ T cells and NK cells (CD8 KO anti-CD4 anti-NK1.1) 48 h before the in vivo cytotoxicity assay. The bars represent average cytotoxicity ± SD for each group. Individual cytotoxicity values are represented by the circles. Allocytotoxicity in all groups was statistically similar (p, NS).

 
In previous studies, we reported that CD4-dependent rejection in CD8 KO recipients is accompanied by a variable level of alloantibody production (22). In the current studies, we also detected a variable level of alloantibody in CD8 KO hepatocyte rejectors (Fig. 1). To determine the correlation between recipient serum alloantibody and the magnitude of in vivo allocytotoxicity, we measured the serum alloantibody levels (day 14 posttransplant) and in vivo cytotoxic activity in CD8 KO hepatocyte rejectors (1 wk postrejection). A group of these CD8 KO rejector recipients were depleted of CD4+ T cells 48 h before the cytotoxicity assay. Fig. 2 shows that CD8 KO hepatocyte rejectors (with or without CD4+ T cell depletion) could be separated into groups with "high" (87 ± 12%) or "low" (28 ± 11%) serum alloantibody levels (p < 0.0001). Alloantibody levels were consistent between days 14 and 28 within individual mice (data not shown). Recipients with high serum alloantibody levels had a significantly higher magnitude of cytotoxicity (98 ± 3% for both untreated and CD4-depleted groups) than recipients with low serum alloantibody levels (26 ± 20% allocytotoxicity for both untreated and CD4-depleted groups) as shown in Fig. 2 (p < 0.0001). Thus, in vivo-allospecific cytotoxic effector function in CD8 KO hepatocyte rejectors is not mediated by CD4+ T cells or NK cells but strongly correlates with the recipient alloantibody level, supporting a causal relationship between Ab and in vivo cytotoxic effector function.


Figure 2
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 2. Recipient serum alloantibody levels correlate with the magnitude of in vivo- allospecific cytotoxic effector function in CD8 KO hepatocyte rejectors. FVB/N (H-2q) hepatocytes were transplanted into untreated (no Rx) CD8 KO (H-2b) mice. After graft rejection occurred (MST = 14 days), CD8 KO hosts were assessed for both alloantibody and in vivo cytotoxic effector function postrejection. Hepatocyte rejector mice were divided into groups with "high" (>60%, n = 10) or "low" (<60%, n = 6) serum alloantibody levels. Some hepatocyte rejectors with high (n = 8) or low (n = 4) alloantibody levels were also depleted of CD4+ T cells (anti-CD4) before the in vivo cytotoxicity assay to eliminate the potential contribution of CD4+ T cells to allocytotoxicity. Serum alloantibody levels in high compared with low alloantibody groups were statistically different (p < 0.0001) and are represented by the circles with the black lines indicating the averages. The average cytotoxicity ± SD for hepatocyte rejector mice with high or low serum alloantibody levels (with or without recipient CD4+ T cell depletion) is represented by the bars. Hosts with high levels of alloantibody demonstrated significantly higher levels of cytotoxicity than hosts with low Ab levels (p < 0.0001 for undepleted as well as CD4-depleted groups).

 
In vivo cytotoxic effector function in CD8 KO rejector mice does not require complement

Activation of the classical complement cascade through cross-linking Abs on the surface of a target cell can result in lysis of the target cell through formation of the membrane attack complex. This potential mechanism in addition to evidence that complement is involved in Ab-mediated rejection in other experimental models (17, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39) prompted our investigation of whether complement is critical to the in vivo cytotoxic effector mechanism observed in CD8 KO hepatocyte rejector mice. Early and/or late phases of the classical complement cascade could contribute to target cell destruction through opsonization or direct lysis of allogeneic target cells, respectively; therefore, cobra venom factor was chosen as a reagent to physiologically exhaust functional complement in recipient hosts (reviewed in Ref. 40). Hepatocellular allografts were transplanted into CD8 KO hosts without immunosuppression. Alloantibody was assayed in CD8 KO rejector mice and only recipients with high serum alloantibody levels (>40% binding of target splenocytes) previously shown to correlate with maximal in vivo cytotoxic effector function (Fig. 2) were used for subsequent experimentation. Following graft rejection, hosts were depleted of CD4+ T cells to focus on alloantibody-mediated immunity and treated with cobra venom factor 24–36 h before the cytotoxicity assay. Complement-depleted hosts (n = 6) did not show any loss of in vivo allocytotoxicity in comparison to hosts not treated with cobra venom factor (n = 10, p, NS; Fig. 3). The two host groups had similar high levels of alloantibody (p, NS). Therefore, complement activity is not required to effect the observed high-magnitude in vivo cytotoxic effector function which is generated in CD8 KO rejector mice.


Figure 3
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 3. In vivo- allospecific cytotoxic effector function generated in CD8 KO rejector mice is mediated by macrophages. FVB/N (H-2q) hepatocytes were transplanted into untreated CD8 KO (H-2b) recipients. Following graft rejection, hosts were depleted of CD4+ T cells alone (n = 10) or CD4+ T cells in addition to NK cells (n = 5), neutrophils (PMN, n = 6), complement (C'; n = 6), or macrophages (Mac; n = 7). In vivo cytotoxicity was assessed within 48 h of host treatment. The average ± SD of allocytotoxicity for each treatment group is shown by the bars. Serum alloantibody level for recipients within the treatment groups is represented by the circles. Alloantibody levels were similar between treatment groups (p, NS). Depletion of host macrophages significantly reduces in vivo allocytotoxicity in comparison to all other groups (p < 0.00001). Treatment of a separate cohort with PBS liposomes as a vehicle control for liposome clodronate did not interfere with cytotoxic activity (n = 2).

 
Host macrophages (but not NK cells or neutrophils) mediate in vivo allospecific cytotoxic effector function in CD8 KO rejector mice

Innate immune cells can contribute to Ab-bound target cell destruction by binding alloantibody through their Fc receptors and triggering cytotoxicity (reviewed in Ref. 41). To determine whether ADCC by innate immune cells is involved in the allocytotoxicity observed in CD8 KO rejector mice, CD8 KO recipients of FVB/N allogeneic hepatocytes were monitored for graft rejection and alloantibody production. Following rejection, the hosts were depleted of CD4+ T cells (GK1.5) and neutrophils (RB6-8C5), NK cells (PK136), or macrophages (liposome-enclosed clodronate) 48 h before the in vivo cytotoxicity assay. As shown in Fig. 3, in vivo allocytotoxicity was not influenced by the depletion of CD4+ T cells alone (n = 10) or CD4+ T cells in conjunction with neutrophils (n = 6) or NK cells (n = 5). In contrast, in the absence of macrophages (n = 7), all hosts showed significantly decreased allocytotoxicity (p < 0.0001), despite similar levels of alloantibody (p, NS between groups). PBS-filled liposomes were used as a control for the liposome treatment and did not deplete host macrophages or reduce the cytotoxic activity of CD8 KO rejector mice (p, NS; PBS liposome-treated hosts compared with hosts not treated with liposomes). Collectively, these data support the conclusion that humoral immune damage of transplanted liver parenchymal cells in CD8 KO hepatocyte rejector mice occurs by an ADCC mechanism mediated by recipient macrophages. We therefore hypothesized that CD8-deficient recipients with genetically impaired macrophage populations or which were macrophage depleted would exhibit prolonged hepatocellular allograft survival.

Host macrophages are required to effect rapid CD4-dependent, alloantibody-mediated hepatocyte rejection

To determine whether macrophages are necessary for CD4-dependent, alloantibody-mediated allogeneic hepatocyte rejection, FVB/N hepatocytes (H-2q) were transplanted into op/op recipient mice (H-2b), which are macrophage "deficient" due to the genetic absence of a macrophage growth and differentiation factor (M-CSF). This genetic defect is known to result in a general reduction of resident macrophages, including in the spleen and liver (42). These recipients were transiently depleted of CD8+ T cells to focus on the CD4-dependent, Ab-mediated rejection pathway. M-CSF+/+ littermates depleted of CD8+ T cells were used as controls and graft survival was compared between the groups (Fig. 4). The CD8-depleted M-CSF+/+ hosts rejected hepatocyte allografts with a MST of 14 days (n = 4), which is equivalent to the rejection kinetics in untreated CD8 KO hosts (shown in Fig. 5 as "no Treatment"; p, NS). However, transiently CD8-depleted macrophage-deficient op/op (M-CSF–/–) hosts demonstrated delayed rejection of hepatocellular allografts with a MST of 35 days (n = 4; p = 0.007). Rejection at this time point coincided with reconstitution of CD8+ T cells in the periphery (Fig. 4). The op/op hosts generated similar levels of alloantibody as the M-CSF+/+ control recipients (60 ± 12% in op/op vs 65 ± 36% in M-CSF+/+; p, NS), suggesting that host macrophage "deficiency" did not affect priming of alloantibody production after hepatocyte transplant. Rather, host macrophages appear important to the efferent phase of CD4-dependent, Ab-mediated hepatocyte rejection.


Figure 4
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 4. Hepatocyte allograft rejection in CD8-depleted recipients is significantly delayed in macrophage-deficient hosts. FVB/N (H-2q) hepatocytes were transplanted into CD8+ T cell-depleted (days –4, –2, 7, and 14) op/op M-CSF-deficient hosts, (which have generally reduced numbers of host macrophages including in the liver and spleen) or into CD8+ T cell-depleted M-CSF wild-type (wt) littermate controls (both H-2b). CD8-depleted M-CSF wild-type controls (n = 4) rejected hepatocyte allografts with a MST of 14 days, similar to CD8 KO hosts (p, NS). CD8-depleted, macrophage-deficient op/op hosts (n = 4) rejected hepatocyte allografts with a MST of 35 days (p = 0.007). Flow cytometric analysis of PBLs was performed to monitor circulating CD8+ T cells in recipient mice. CD8+ T cell reconstitution in transiently CD8-depleted recipient mice is shown by the gray area.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 5. Depletion of host macrophages during the efferent immune phase significantly delays rejection in CD8 KO recipients. FVB/N (H-2q) hepatocytes were transplanted into CD8 KO (H-2b) recipients. Recipients were depleted of macrophages (liposome clodronate) or treated with control liposome-enclosed PBS on days 5, 9, 13, 17, and 21 after hepatocyte transplant. A third group of CD8 KO hosts remained untreated. Hepatocyte allografts were rejected with a MST of 10 days in untreated hosts and 14 days in control PBS liposome-treated hosts (p, NS). Macrophage depletion during the effector phase of CD4-dependent, alloantibody-mediated graft rejection significantly prolonged hepatocyte allograft survival (MST = 25 days; p < 0.001 relative to untreated hosts, p = 0.003 relative to control liposome PBS-treated hosts).

 
An additional experimental approach to focus on the role of macrophages during the effector arm of CD4-dependent Ab-mediated hepatocyte rejection was used. CD8 KO recipients were transplanted with allogeneic FVB/N hepatocytes and rejection permitted to ensue for 5 days posttransplant. Then host macrophages were depleted from untreated CD8 KO recipients during the efferent immune phase with clodronate liposomes, a macrophage depletion treatment technology developed by Van Rooijen and Sanders (28), which is reported to be effective for ~5–6 days per treatment. The effect of host macrophage depletion in CD8 KO recipients by treatment with clodronate liposomes was compared with CD8 KO recipients treated with control PBS liposomes. Serial host macrophage depletion beginning day 5 posttransplant did not affect the level of alloantibody production compared with control liposome-treated hosts or untreated hosts (alloantibody level: 68 ± 24% in liposome clodronate-treated hosts, n = 6; 62 ± 39% in PBS liposome-treated hosts, n = 4; 61 ± 26% in untreated CD8 KO hosts, n = 7). Hepatocyte allograft rejection was similar in untreated hosts (MST = 10 days; n = 7) and control PBS liposome treated hosts (MST = 14 days; n = 4; p, NS). In contrast, in hosts depleted of macrophages, hepatocellular allograft survival was prolonged with a MST of 25 days (n = 6; p < 0.001 compared with untreated hosts, p = 0.003 compared with liposome clodronate treated hosts; Fig. 5).

Immunohistochemistry of recipient livers (days 8 and 9 after transplant) confirmed the depletion of host macrophages (F4/80+ cells) in hepatocyte recipients treated with liposome clodronate (Fig. 6, A and B). Donor hepatocytes, detected by staining for the transgenic reporter product hA1AT, were present in the recipient liver in both macrophage-replete and macrophage-depleted hosts (Fig. 6, C and D). No evidence for C4d staining of recipient liver tissue was noted (data not shown). Cumulative histologic assessment of successive sections of the host livers on days 8 and after transplant showed, even at this early time point following macrophage depletion, more abundant donor hepatocytes in the macrophage-depleted hosts in comparison to the undepleted hosts, concordant with the extended graft survival in macrophage-depleted hosts. In macrophage-replete (untreated) mouse liver sections, 44 ± 13.7 donor hepatocytes were detected (x20 high-power field) while significantly more donor (hA1AT-positive) hepatocytes were found in liver sections from macrophage-depleted mice (91 ± 13.2 hepatocytes; p = 0.0032).


Figure 6
View larger version (164K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 6. Liver immunohistochemical staining in liposome clodronate-treated CD8 KO recipients. Immunohistochemical staining for F4/80+ (macrophage marker) cells (arrows) in the liver of an untreated CD8 KO recipient 9 days after FVB/N hepatocyte transplantation (A). Staining for F4/80+ cells in the liver of liposome clodronate-treated hosts 8 days following hepatocyte transplantation shows the complete absence of liver macrophages (B). The presence of donor hepatocytes engrafted within the recipient liver parenchyma (arrows) are detectable in untreated CD8 KO recipients (C), as well as in liposome clodronate-treated (macrophage-depleted) hosts (D) on days 8 and 9 posttransplant. Serial section analysis revealed more clusters of donor hepatocytes present in the livers of macrophage-depleted recipients in comparison to untreated recipients.

 
Alloantibody and macrophages together effect in vitro hepatocellular cytotoxicity

To further explore the role of macrophages in humoral immune damage of allogeneic hepatocytes, hepatocytotoxicity was evaluated using an in vitro cellular cytotoxicity assay. Alloantibody in serum from CD8 KO (H-2b) mice was collected 14 days after allogeneic (FVB/N, H-2q) hepatocyte transplantation. Hepatocytes (FVB/N) were cultured with alloantibody, serum from untransplanted (H-2b) mice, or left untreated (37°C, 30 min). Following incubation with Ab, hepatocytes were plated into culture dishes and cultured alone or cocultured with macrophages for 8 h. Macrophages (H-2b) were added to the appropriate wells with hepatocytes at specific E:T ratios (E:T = 10:1 or 40:1). ALT release in the culture supernatant was measured as a reflection of hepatocellular injury. As a positive control, hepatocytes were mechanically disrupted in deionized H2O which resulted in a "maximum" ALT release of 202.0 ± 9.5 U/ml (data not shown). Hepatocytes that were cultured alone and hepatocytes cultured with serum-containing alloantibody showed similar baseline ALT release (50.7 ± 4.1 U/ml vs 44.4 ± 4.1 U/ml; Fig. 7). Untreated hepatocytes that were cocultured with macrophages (E:T = 10:1 and 40:1) also showed similar baseline ALT release (41.7 ± 5.9 and 44.7 ± 4.5 U/ml, respectively) when compared with the untreated control. However, hepatocytes that were treated with serum-containing alloantibody and cocultured with macrophages (E:T = 10:1 and 40:1) exhibited a significant increase in ALT release (89.8 ± 2.3 and 116.2 ± 7.7 U/ml, respectively; p < 0.0001 for both E:T ratios) compared with untreated hepatocytes or hepatocytes cultured with alloantibody or macrophages alone.


Figure 7
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 7. Alloantibody and macrophage effect in vitro hepatocellular cytotoxicity. The role of macrophages in effecting Ab-dependent immune injury to hepatocytes was examined using an in vitro hepatocytotoxicity assay based on the release of intracellular ALT into the culture supernatant. Purified FVB/N (H-2q) mouse hepatocytes that were untreated or incubated with serum from untransplanted (naive) mice (H-2b) or serum-containing alloantibody (from CD8 KO, H-2b, hepatocyte rejectors) were subsequently cocultured with macrophages (H-2b) at various E:T ratios (E:T = hepatocytes alone, 10:1, or 40:1). Hepatocytotoxicity was measured by supernatant quantification of ALT release from injured hepatocytes. Hepatocytes that were treated with alloantibody and cocultured with macrophages (E:T = 10:1 and 40:1) exhibited a significant increase in ALT release (p < 0.0001 for both E:T ratios; *, significance) compared with hepatocytes untreated or treated with serum from untransplanted (naive) mice and hepatocytes incubated with alloantibody or macrophages alone. Error bars denote the SDs of triplicate wells. The data are representative of three experiments.

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
Disclosures
 References
 
Both clinical and experimental studies highlight the barrier that acute Ab-mediated allograft rejection (AAMR) poses to successful allograft survival (reviewed in Refs. 1 , 25 , and 43, 44, 45, 46). Acute Ab-mediated rejection occurs despite the use of maintenance immunosuppression to prevent rejection and is associated with worse graft outcome than T cell-mediated rejection (47). The detection of C4d complement-split product in graft tissue is an integral component of the recently established standards used to diagnose AAMR in kidney and cardiac allograft recipients (48). Complement deposition is usually detected perivascularly, supporting the inference that Ab and complement primarily target graft endothelial cells with subsequent ischemic graft damage (reviewed in Refs. 1 , 21 , 44 , and 48). The current studies which focus on humoral immune damage of transplanted allogeneic liver parenchymal cells add an additional dimension to existing studies which focus on donor endothelial cell damage.

Our studies used a well-characterized hepatocellular allograft model that is known to initiate brisk alloantibody production and CD4-dependent rejection in the absence of CD8+ T cells (26). Alloantibody is sufficient to mediate acute rejection of hepatocellular allografts engrafted in the liver in the absence of host T or B cells and without nonspecific tissue or vascular injury to the native liver (22). In the current studies, CD4-dependent (CD8-independent) rejection of allogeneic liver parenchymal cells in CD8 KO recipients was accompanied by alloantibody production and the development of high-magnitude in vivo cytotoxic effector activity which is not mediated by CD4+ T cells or NK cells. In vivo cytotoxic effector activity is highly correlated with graft rejection in this transplant model since rejection is always accompanied by the detection of in vivo allocytotoxicity and in vivo allocytotoxicity is always absent with graft acceptance (induced by effective immunotherapy) (29). Since in vivo allocytotoxicity in CD8 KO rejector mice is not mediated by CD4+ T cells, it is likely that the allospecificity of the observed cytotoxic effector function is attributable to serum alloantibody. The observation that recipient serum alloantibody levels correlated with the magnitude of in vivo-allospecific cytotoxic activity is consistent with this conclusion. Furthermore, we have previously reported that alloantibodies in rejector mice bind to allogeneic but not third-party or syngeneic hepatocytes by flow cytometric analysis (22). Additionally, the observed in vivo cytotoxicity is allospecific since differential target cell clearance is only observed when allogeneic and syngeneic targets are injected into recipient mice. Rejector mice do not differentially clear third-party targets when coinjected with syngeneic targets (32).

Different mechanisms of Ab-mediated graft endothelial cell injury have been described. These include both complement-dependent (membrane attack complex lysis, recruitment of innate inflammatory cells, and opsonization by complement proteins with subsequent phagocytosis) and complement-independent cytotoxic mechanisms (ADCC) (21). Our studies did not support a complement-dependent cytotoxic mechanism of allogeneic parenchymal cell damage since complement-depleted hosts retained high cytotoxic effector function. Rather, our studies are consistent with a paradigm of acute humoral rejection by an ADCC mechanism in which CD4+ T cell-dependent alloantibody production results in targeting of transplanted allogeneic parenchymal cells for macrophage-mediated cytotoxic immune damage (Fig. 8). This paradigm is supported by the observation that only depletion of host macrophages (and not NK cells or neutrophils) in CD8 KO rejector mice markedly reduces in vivo cytotoxic effector function. The remaining low-level in vivo allocytotoxicity could be attributed to incomplete macrophage depletion or to the activity of CD4–CD8– TCR+ killer cells and/or eosinophils in CD8 KO mice. Furthermore, genetic deficiency of recipient macrophages in op/op hosts, or transient depletion of host macrophages with liposome clodronate following the onset of CD4-dependent allograft rejection in CD8 KO recipients, resulted in significant prolongation of allograft survival in comparison to macrophage-replete controls. Prolongation of graft survival in macrophage-deficient recipients could not be attributed to differences in serum alloantibody since alloantibody levels were equivalent in both macrophage-deficient and macrophage replete hosts. The data also demonstrate that host macrophages were critical during the effector phase of rejection in CD8 KO hosts since transient macrophage depletion after the onset of rejection effectively delayed rejection. Furthermore, macrophages are sufficient to effect alloantibody-dependent hepatocyte cytotoxicity in vitro. Resident liver Kupffer cells are presumably a primary macrophage population involved in ADCC-associated humoral rejection in this model since hepatocytes are transplanted to the liver. Human Kupffer cells have been shown to express Fc{gamma}RI in areas of liver inflammation, as well as Fc{gamma}RII and Fc{gamma}RIII, all of which participate in ADCC (49, 50). The donor-directed Ab developing in response to hepatocellular allografts is polyclonal, developing high titers of IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, and IgG3 isotypes (P. H. Horne, unpublished observation); consequently, all Fc receptor types may be relevant. However, if further experimentation revealed that one receptor was used predominantly, therapy targeting the individual receptor could be developed to avoid systemic macrophage depletion.


Figure 8
View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 8. Proposed paradigm for Ab-mediated rejection of parenchymal cells in solid organ allografts. Circulating alloantibody (AlloAb) binds alloantigen (AlloAg), presumably but not limited to donor MHC molecules, on donor vascular endothelial cells (ECs). Activation of the complement cascade results in injury to capillary endothelial cells with subsequent efflux of alloantibody and recruited inflammatory cells (1). Within the surrounding graft parenchymal tissue, alloantibody binding to MHC alloantigen (and/or non-MHC Ags) on parenchymal cells allows for specific humoral targeting of donor cells (2). FcR interaction of recruited and resident macrophages (Mac) with Ab-bound allogeneic parenchymal cells (3) initiates macrophage-mediated ADCC and destruction of graft parenchyma (4).

 
The role of ADCC in allograft rejection in humans has been proposed, but limited clinical data are available to support this as an effector mechanism during AAMR (reviewed in Refs. 21 and 44). Many clinical and experimental studies of AAMR after cardiac (14, 15, 17), renal (18, 51), and liver (8, 52) transplantation have been notable for increased macrophage infiltration in concert with C4d staining in the graft tissue. However, in these studies, the role of macrophages as effectors of acute humoral rejection was not examined. To our knowledge, the current report is the first to demonstrate a role of macrophages as effectors of CD4/alloantibody-mediated in vivo cytotoxicity and acute rejection of allogeneic parenchymal cells. Results of the current studies have direct implications for humoral immune damage of clinical cellular allografts, such as hepatocyte, bone marrow, or islet allografts; alloantibody in sensitized bone marrow or islet allograft human recipients is a known barrier for successful cellular engraftment (23, 25). These results also suggest that the macrophage infiltration noted in solid organ allografts during Ab-mediated rejection may be active participants in the humoral rejection process.

Although the current studies did not show a role for complement for in vivo cytotoxic effector function or evidence of C3d staining during hepatocyte allograft rejection, allograft rejection is a complex process requiring recruitment of inflammatory cells to the graft site, recognition of target cells by host immune cells, and local activation of effector mechanisms. Complement can contribute to macrophage-dependent infiltration of the graft tissue, as has been reported in clinical (reviewed in Refs. 11 , 43 , and 53) and experimental studies (34, 54). Experimental studies have also demonstrated a role for complement in the pathogenicity of alloantibody for acute rejection of cardiac allografts (55). Another study demonstrated that recipient macrophages provide an important source of terminal complement protein C6, which is necessary for membrane attack complex formation and humoral rejection of cardiac allografts (56). Thus, complement may be important for recruitment of macrophages, alloantibody pathogenicity, and/or have a role as a macrophage effector product. Perhaps in solid organ allografts, which possess donor-type vasculature, complement activation on donor endothelial cells with membrane attack complex formation results in damage to the graft blood vessels with subsequent inflammatory cell and alloantibody influx into the parenchyma. Once the vascular bed is compromised, macrophages can more readily access the parenchyma and along with native tissue macrophages exert complement-independent humoral immune injury (ADCC) to graft parenchymal cells. In allograft tissues such as the liver, which possesses fenestrated endothelial barriers, damage to the graft endothelium may not be necessary to allow Ab access to graft parenchyma. In this situation, immune damage to engrafted allogeneic parenchymal cells could occur in the absence of endothelial damage and complement activity.

In conclusion, acute humoral rejection of organ allografts is marked in severe cases by vasculitis, thrombosis, and hemorrhage. In the absence of these advanced hallmark histologic characteristics, the presence of C4d in concert with relevant clinical indicators is diagnostic for Ab-mediated rejection. The current studies support a novel paradigm of humoral immune injury to allogeneic parenchymal cells, which occurs through a macrophage-mediated ADCC mechanism. Depletion or impairment of recipient macrophages significantly reduced in vivo allocytotoxicity and enhanced hepatocellular allograft survival in two models, suggesting a promising therapeutic target for CD4-dependent, Ab-mediated rejection of graft parenchymal cells. Targeting macrophage-mediated mechanisms of graft parenchymal destruction could afford time to attempt more permanent therapies to inhibit alloantibody production.


   Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr. Gregg Hadley (Ohio State University Comprehensive Transplant Center) for critical review of this manuscript and helpful comments and Lori Fiessinger for assistance with manuscript preparation.


   Disclosures
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
References
 
The authors have no financial conflict of interest.


   Footnotes
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 This work was supported in part by grants from the American Society of Transplantation Basic Science Physician Scientist Award, Roche Organ Transplantation Research Foundation, American Society of Transplant Surgeons, and National Institutes of Health (Grant DK072262). Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Ginny L. Bumgardner, Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant, Ohio State University Medical Center, 1654 Upham Drive, 373 Means Hall, Columbus, OH 43210. E-mail address: ginny.bumgardner{at}osumc.edu Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: ADCC, Ab-dependent cellular cytotoxicity; KO, knockout; ALT, alanine transaminase; MST, median survival time; AAMR, Ab-mediated allograft rejection. Back

Received for publication January 29, 2008. Accepted for publication May 13, 2008.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 

  1. Terasaki, P. I., J. Cai. 2005. Humoral theory of transplantation: further evidence. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 17: 541-545. [Medline]
  2. Koo, D. D., I. S. Roberts, I. Quiroga, J. Procter, M. C. Barnardo, M. Sutton, L. Cerundolo, D. R. Davies, P. J. Friend, P. J. Morris, S. V. Fuggle. 2004. C4d deposition in early renal allograft protocol biopsies. Transplantation 78: 398-403. [Medline]
  3. Poduval, R. D., P. V. Kadambi, M. A. Josephson, R. A. Cohn, R. C. Harland, B. Javaid, D. Huo, J. R. Manaligod, J. R. Thistlethwaite, S. M. Meehan. 2005. Implications of immunohistochemical detection of C4d along peritubular capillaries in late acute renal allograft rejection. Transplantation 79: 228-235. [Medline]
  4. Bohmig, G. A., M. Exner, A. Habicht, M. Schillinger, U. Lang, J. Kletzmayr, M. D. Saemann, W. H. Horl, B. Watschinger, H. Regele. 2002. Capillary C4d deposition in kidney allografts: a specific marker of alloantibody-dependent graft injury. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 13: 1091-1099. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Vargha, R., T. Mueller, K. Arbeiter, H. Regele, M. Exner, D. Csaicsich, C. Aufricht. 2006. C4d in pediatric renal allograft biopsies: a marker for negative outcome in steroid-resistant rejection. Pediatr. Transplant. 10: 449-453. [Medline]
  6. Girnita, A. L., R. Duquesnoy, S. A. Yousem, A. T. Iacono, T. E. Corcoran, M. Buzoianu, B. Johnson, K. J. Spichty, J. H. Dauber, G. Burckart, et al 2005. HLA-specific antibodies are risk factors for lymphocytic bronchiolitis and chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Am. J. Transplant. 5: 131-138. [Medline]
  7. Magro, C. M., A. E. Abbas, K. Seilstad, A. L. Pope-Harman, T. Nadasdy, P. Ross, Jr. 2006. C3d and the septal microvasculature as a predictor of chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Hum. Immunol. 67: 274-283. [Medline]
  8. Sawada, T., A. Shimizu, K. Kubota, S. Fuchinoue, S. Teraoka. 2005. Lobular damage caused by cellular and humoral immunity in liver allograft rejection. Clin. Transplant. 19: 110-114. [Medline]
  9. Schmeding, M., A. Dankof, V. Krenn, M. G. Krukemeyer, M. Koch, A. Spinelli, J. M. Langrehr, U. P. Neumann, P. Neuhaus. 2006. C4d in acute rejection after liver transplantation: a valuable tool in differential diagnosis to hepatitis C recurrence. Am. J. Transplant. 6: 523-530. [Medline]
  10. Lorho, R., B. Turlin, N. Aqodad, N. Triki, A. S. de Lajarte-Thirouard, C. Camus, M. Lakehal, P. Compagnon, E. Dupont-Bierre, B. Meunier, et al 2006. C4d: a marker for hepatic transplant rejection. Transplant. Proc. 38: 2333-2334. [Medline]
  11. Abrams, J., O. Amir, W. B. Etheridge, O. H. Frazier. 2007. Histologic findings proving the existence of humoral rejection in a cardiac allograft. Cardiovasc. Pathol. 16: 38-42. [Medline]
  12. Vasilescu, E. R., E. K. Ho, L. de la Torre, S. Itescu, C. Marboe, R. Cortesini, N. Suciu-Foca, D. Mancini. 2004. Anti-HLA antibodies in heart transplantation. Transpl. Immunol. 12: 177-183. [Medline]
  13. Smith, R. N., N. Brousaides, L. Grazette, S. Saidman, M. Semigran, T. Disalvo, J. Madsen, G. W. Dec, A. R. Perez-Atayde, A. B. Collins. 2005. C4d deposition in cardiac allografts correlates with alloantibody. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 24: 1202-1210. [Medline]
  14. Ratliff, N. B., J. T. McMahon. 1995. Activation of intravascular macrophages within myocardial small vessels is a feature of acute vascular rejection in human heart transplants. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 14: 338-345. [Medline]
  15. Lones, M. A., L. S. Czer, A. Trento, D. Harasty, J. M. Miller, M. C. Fishbein. 1995. Clinical-pathologic features of humoral rejection in cardiac allografts: a study in 81 consecutive patients. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 14: 151-162. [Medline]
  16. Michaels, P. J., M. L. Espejo, J. Kobashigawa, J. C. Alejos, C. Burch, S. Takemoto, E. F. Reed, M. C. Fishbein. 2003. Humoral rejection in cardiac transplantation: risk factors, hemodynamic consequences and relationship to transplant coronary artery disease. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 22: 58-69. [Medline]
  17. Qian, Z., C. Y. Lee, K. Murata, J. Liu, K. Fox-Talbot, B. A. Wasowska, W. M. Baldwin, 3rd. 2006. Antibody and complement-mediated injury in transplants following sensitization by allogeneic blood transfusion. Transplantation 82: 857-864. [Medline]
  18. Magil, A. B., K. Tinckam. 2003. Monocytes and peritubular capillary C4d deposition in acute renal allograft rejection. Kidney Int. 63: 1888-1893. [Medline]
  19. Mauiyyedi, S., M. Crespo, A. B. Collins, E. E. Schneeberger, M. A. Pascual, S. L. Saidman, N. E. Tolkoff-Rubin, W. W. Williams, F. L. Delmonico, A. B. Cosimi, R. B. Colvin. 2002. Acute humoral rejection in kidney transplantation: II. Morphology, immunopathology, and pathologic classification. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 13: 779-787. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Trpkov, K., P. Campbell, F. Pazderka, S. Cockfield, K. Solez, P. F. Halloran. 1996. Pathologic features of acute renal allograft rejection associated with donor-specific antibody, analysis using the Banff grading schema. Transplantation 61: 1586-1592. [Medline]
  21. Cai, J., P. I. Terasaki. 2005. Humoral theory of transplantation: mechanism, prevention, and treatment. Hum. Immunol. 66: 334-342. [Medline]
  22. Horne, P. H., K. E. Lunsford, A. M. Eiring, Y. Wang, D. Gao, G. L. Bumgardner. 2005. CD4+ T-cell-dependent immune damage of liver parenchymal cells is mediated by alloantibody. Transplantation 80: 514-521. [Medline]
  23. Mohanakumar, T., K. Narayanan, N. Desai, S. Ramachandran, S. Shenoy, M. Jendrisak, B. M. Susskind, B. Olack, N. Benshoff, D. L. Phelan, et al 2006. A significant role for histocompatibility in human islet transplantation. Transplantation 82: 180-187. [Medline]
  24. Rickels, M. R., M. Kamoun, J. Kearns, J. F. Markmann, A. Naji. 2007. Evidence for allograft rejection in an islet transplant recipient and effect on β-cell secretory capacity. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 92: 2410-2414. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Xu, H., P. M. Chilton, M. K. Tanner, Y. Huang, C. L. Schanie, M. Dy-Liacco, J. Yan, S. T. Ildstad. 2006. Humoral immunity is the dominant barrier for allogeneic bone marrow engraftment in sensitized recipients. Blood 108: 3611-3619. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Bumgardner, G. L., D. Gao, J. Li, J. Baskin, M. Heininger, C. G. Orosz. 2000. Rejection responses to allogeneic hepatocytes by reconstituted SCID mice, CD4 KO, and CD8 KO mice. Transplantation 70: 1771-1780. [Medline]
  27. Bumgardner, G. L., M. Heininger, J. Li, D. Xia, J. Parker-Thornburg, R. M. Ferguson, C. G. Orosz. 1998. A functional model of hepatocyte transplantation for in vivo immunologic studies. Transplantation 65: 53-61. [Medline]
  28. Van Rooijen, N., A. Sanders. 1994. Liposome-mediated depletion of macrophages: mechanism of action, preparation of liposomes and applications. J. Immunol. Methods 174: 83-93. [Medline]
  29. Lunsford, K. E., M. A. Koester, A. M. Eiring, D. Gao, P. H. Horne, G. L. Bumgardner. 2005. Targeting LFA-1 and CD154 suppresses the in vivo activation and development of cytolytic (CD4-independent) CD8+ T cells. J. Immunol. 175: 7855-7866. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Luo, Y., H. Yamada, D. P. Evanoff, X. Chen. 2006. Role of Th1-stimulating cytokines in bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)-induced macrophage cytotoxicity against mouse bladder cancer MBT-2 cells. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 146: 181-188. [Medline]
  31. Kean, L. S., K. Hamby, B. Koehn, E. Lee, S. Coley, L. Stempora, A. B. Adams, E. Heiss, T. C. Pearson, C. P. Larsen. 2006. NK cells mediate costimulation blockade-resistant rejection of allogeneic stem cells during nonmyeloablative transplantation. Am. J. Transplant. 6: 292-304. [Medline]
  32. Horne, P. H., M. A. Koester, K. Jayashankar, K. E. Lunsford, H. L. Dziema, G. L. Bumgardner. 2007. Disparate primary and secondary allospecific CD8+ T cell cytolytic effector function in the presence or absence of host CD4+ T cells. J. Immunol. 179: 80-88. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Amano, H., A. Bickerstaff, C. G. Orosz, A. C. Novick, H. Toma, R. L. Fairchild. 2005. Absence of recipient CCR5 promotes early and increased allospecific antibody responses to cardiac allografts. J. Immunol. 174: 6499-6508. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Wang, H., J. Jiang, W. Liu, D. Kubelik, G. Chen, D. Gies, B. Garcia, R. Zhong, R. P. Rother. 2005. Prevention of acute vascular rejection by a functionally blocking anti-C5 monoclonal antibody combined with cyclosporine. Transplantation 79: 1121-1127. [Medline]
  35. Li, R., G. Chen, H. Guo, D. W. Wang, L. Xie, S. S. Wang, W. Y. Wang, Y. L. Xiong, S. Chen. 2006. Prolonged cardiac allograft survival in presensitized rats after a high activity Yunnan-cobra venom factor therapy. Transplant. Proc. 38: 3263-3265. [Medline]
  36. Minami, K., K. Murata, C. Y. Lee, K. Fox-Talbot, B. A. Wasowska, M. D. Pescovitz, W. M. Baldwin, 3rd. 2006. C4d deposition and clearance in cardiac transplants correlates with alloantibody levels and rejection in rats. Am. J. Transplant. 6: 923-932. [Medline]
  37. Qian, Z., F. M. Jakobs, T. Pfaff-Amesse, F. Sanfilippo, W. M. Baldwin, 3rd. 1998. Complement contributes to the rejection of complete and class I major histocompatibility complex: incompatible cardiac allografts. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 17: 470-478. [Medline]
  38. Nakashima, S., Z. Qian, S. Rahimi, B. A. Wasowska, W. M. Baldwin, 3rd. 2002. Membrane attack complex contributes to destruction of vascular integrity in acute lung allograft rejection. J. Immunol. 169: 4620-4627. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Lin, T., W. Zhou, C. A. Farrar, R. E. Hargreaves, N. S. Sheerin, S. H. Sacks. 2006. Deficiency of C4 from donor or recipient mouse fails to prevent renal allograft rejection. Am. J. Pathol. 168: 1241-1248. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Morgan, B. P., C. L. Harris. 2003. Complement therapeutics: history and current progress. Mol. Immunol. 40: 159-170. [Medline]
  41. Siberil, S., C. A. Dutertre, W. H. Fridman, J. L. Teillaud. 2007. Fc{gamma}R: the key to optimize therapeutic antibodies?. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 62: 26-33. [Medline]
  42. Naito, M., S. Hayashi, H. Yoshida, S. Nishikawa, L. D. Shultz, K. Takahashi. 1991. Abnormal differentiation of tissue macrophage populations in "osteopetrosis" (op) mice defective in the production of macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Am. J. Pathol. 139: 657-667. [Abstract]
  43. Moll, S., M. Pascual. 2005. Humoral rejection of organ allografts. Am. J. Transplant. 5: 2611-2618. [Medline]
  44. Colvin, R. B., R. N. Smith. 2005. Antibody-mediated organ-allograft rejection. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 5: 807-817. [Medline]
  45. Shimizu, A., R. B. Colvin. 2005. Pathological features of antibody-mediated rejection. Curr. Drug Targets Cardiovasc. Haematol. Disord. 5: 199-214. [Medline]
  46. Vongwiwatana, A., A. Tasanarong, L. G. Hidalgo, P. F. Halloran. 2003. The role of B cells and alloantibody in the host response to human organ allografts. Immunol. Rev. 196: 197-218. [Medline]
  47. Lorenz, M., H. Regele, M. Schillinger, M. Exner, S. Rasoul-Rockenschaub, M. Wahrmann, J. Kletzmayr, G. Silberhumer, W. H. Horl, G. A. Bohmig. 2004. Risk factors for capillary C4d deposition in kidney allografts: evaluation of a large study cohort. Transplantation 78: 447-452. [Medline]
  48. Takemoto, S. K., A. Zeevi, S. Feng, R. B. Colvin, S. Jordan, J. Kobashigawa, J. Kupiec-Weglinski, A. Matas, R. A. Montgomery, P. Nickerson, et al 2004. National conference to assess antibody-mediated rejection in solid organ transplantation. Am. J. Transplant. 4: 1033-1041. [Medline]
  49. Wu, J. Z., C. K. Ogle, J. D. Ogle, J. W. Alexander. 1993. A comparison of hepatic, splenic, peritoneal, and alveolar macrophages with respect to PGE2, TXB2, production and ADCC function. Prostaglandins Leukotrienes Essent. Fatty Acids 48: 149-153. [Medline]
  50. Tomita, M., K. Yamamoto, H. Kobashi, M. Ohmoto, T. Tsuji. 1994. Immunohistochemical phenotyping of liver macrophages in normal and diseased human liver. Hepatology 20: 317-325. [Medline]
  51. Tinckam, K. J., O. Djurdjev, A. B. Magil. 2005. Glomerular monocytes predict worse outcomes after acute renal allograft rejection independent of C4d status. Kidney Int. 68: 1866-1874. [Medline]
  52. Dankof, A., M. Schmeding, L. Morawietz, R. Gunther, M. G. Krukemeyer, B. Rudolph, M. Koch, V. Krenn, U. Neumann. 2005. Portal capillary C4d deposits and increased infiltration by macrophages indicate humorally mediated mechanisms in acute cellular liver allograft rejection. Virchows Arch. 447: 87-93. [Medline]
  53. Fahim, T., G. A. Bohmig, M. Exner, N. Huttary, H. Kerschner, S. Kandutsch, D. Kerjaschki, A. Brambock, K. Nagy-Bojarszky, H. Regele. 2007. The cellular lesion of humoral rejection: predominant recruitment of monocytes to peritubular and glomerular capillaries. Am. J. Transplant. 7: 385-393. [Medline]
  54. Rahimi, S., Z. Qian, J. Layton, K. Fox-Talbot, W. M. Baldwin, III, B. A. Wasowska. 2004. Non-complement- and complement-activating antibodies synergize to cause rejection of cardiac allografts. Am. J. Transplant 4: 326-334. [Medline]
  55. Wasowska, B. A., Z. Qian, D. L. Cangello, E. Behrens, K. V. Tran, J. Layton, F. Sanfilippo, W. M. Baldwin. 2001. Passive transfer of alloantibodies restores acute cardiac rejection in IgKO mice. Transplantation 71: 727-736. [Medline]
  56. Qian, Z., B. A. Wasowska, E. Behrens, D. L. Cangello, J. R. Brody, S. S. Kadkol, L. Horwitz, J. Liu, C. Lowenstein, A. D. Hess, et al 1999. C6 produced by macrophages contributes to cardiac allograft rejection. Am. J. Pathol. 155: 1293-1302. [Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Horne, P. H.
Right arrow Articles by Bumgardner, G. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Horne, P. H.
Right arrow Articles by Bumgardner, G. L.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS