|
|
||||||||
Expression by IL-7 and TCR Signaling1
* Department of Experimental Immunology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands and
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
is essential for the development and homeostatic maintenance of mature T cells. Studies in humans and mice have shown that IL-7R
expression is reduced by its cognate cytokine, IL-7, and Ag, suggesting that active regulation of IL-7 responsiveness is necessary to balance T cell numbers. We show that IL-7- or TCR/CD28-mediated signaling induced a rapid down-regulation of IL-7R
expression on naive T cells on the mRNA and protein level, with a mild (10-fold) or strong (50-fold) gene suppression, respectively. In both situations, the down-regulation of IL-7R
was blocked by cyclohexamide and actinomycin D, indicating the involvement of an active mechanism dependent on new transcription and protein synthesis. Upon IL-7 withdrawal, IL-7R
mRNA and surface protein reappeared in a transcription-dependent manner within 7 h. Yet, IL-7R
was hardly re-expressed during the same period after TCR/CD28-activation. Likewise, T cells that were activated through CMV in vivo did not re-express IL-7R
after in vitro culture. Functionally, IL-7-induced down-regulation of IL-7R
did not hinder the responsiveness of naive T cells to IL-7. Conversely, down-regulation of IL-7R
on TCR/CD28-activated cells limited IL-7 responsiveness. Strikingly, ectopic expression of IL-7R
cells on TCR/CD28-activated cells conferred a selective advantage in the response to IL-7. In conclusion, our data show that IL-7- and TCR/CD28-mediated signaling differentially regulate IL-7R
expression on human T cells with a transient and chronic effect, respectively. The stringent and active regulation of IL-7R
may constitute a homeostatic mechanism to curtail unwarranted T cell expansion. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
in T cell ontogeny and maintenance is well established. The variable expression found at different stages of T cell development, activation, and differentiation infers that the IL-7R
locus is under active control. IL-7 regulates the homeostasis of naive T cells in the periphery together with signals from low affinity interactions between TCR and self-peptide-major histocompatibility complexes (1, 2, 3). IL-7 belongs to the common cytokine-receptor
-chain family. It binds a dimeric receptor constituted by the high affinity IL-7R
-chain (CD127) and the
-chain (CD132) (4). IL-7 may be a limiting survival factor because its levels in the circulation correlate inversely with T cell numbers (5, 6, 7). Both human and mouse naive T cells expanded in IL-7 maintain their phenotype, except for the conspicuous down-regulation of IL-7R
(8, 9). For murine T cells, it has been established that this is an active process regulated at the transcriptional level (9, 10). These findings have led to the assumption that the down-regulation of IL-7R
constitutes a homeostatic mechanism to regulate IL-7 consumption by naive T cells (9). Although a similar mechanism may be expected, the certainty of this principle remains to be demonstrated in humans.
Studies with human and mouse T cells have demonstrated that antigenic stimulation also causes a down-regulation of cell surface IL-7R
protein in T cells (10, 11, 12, 13, 14). Current models explain the biological significance of this dynamic regulation as a homeostatic mechanism that controls IL-7 responsiveness. We performed a comprehensive characterization on the impact of IL-7- or combined TCR/CD28-activation on the regulation of IL-7R
in human naive T cells. Our data demonstrated that the expression of IL-7R
in T cells was actively and differentially controlled by these two distinct signals. Markedly, whereas IL-7 induced a transient down-regulation of IL-7R
, TCR/CD28-mediated signaling caused a chronic down-regulation of this receptor. These dissimilarities are reflected in the subsequent responsiveness to IL-7.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The mAbs PE-conjugated CD4, PerCP-conjugated CD3, allophycocyanin-conjugated CD3, PerCP-conjugated CD8, and Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated pSTAT5 were purchased from Becton Dickinson. Isotype controls consisted of mouse IgG1. Allophycocyanin-conjugated CD8, PE-conjugated and allophycocyanin-conjugated CD45RA were obtained from Coulter. CD27-FITC (clone 3A12) and allophycocyanin-conjugated HLA-A2 tetramer loaded with the CMV pp65-derived NLVPTMVATV peptide and HLA-B7 tetramer loaded with the CMV pp65-derived TPRVTGGGAM peptide were obtained from Sanquin. PE-conjugated anti-IL-7R
(CD127) was purchased from Immunotech. Microbeads coated with anti-human CD4 or CD8 (CD4 or CD8 microbeads) were purchased from Miltenyi Biotec, MACS. Cells were stained with indicated mAbs and were analyzed on a FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences). Cyclohexamide (CHX)5 and actinomycin D (Act D) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich.
Cell preparation
Human PBMCs from healthy donors, and umbilical cord blood mononuclear cells were isolated by Ficoll-Isopaque density gradient centrifugation (Nycomed, Pharma). Naive CD4+ or CD8+ T cells were purified from total umbilical cord blood mononuclear cells by positive selection using the MACS system, as described previously (15). The sample purity was assessed by FACS, with PE-conjugated CD4 and PerCP-conjugated CD3 mAb or PerCP-conjugated CD3 and allophycocyanin-conjugated CD8. The purity ranged 90–95%.
The J16 clone was derived from the human T acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell line Jurkat by limiting dilution and was selected for CD95 sensitivity (16).
CFSE labeling
Purified naive CD4+ T cells were pelleted and resuspended in PBS at a final concentration of 5–10 x 106 cells/ml. Next, cells were labeled in 0.5 µM (final concentration) of CFSE (Molecular Probes Europe BV) in PBS for 10 min at 37°C. Cells were washed and subsequently resuspended in IMDM supplemented with L-Glutamine, 25 mM HEPES (Biowhittaker), containing 10% human pool serum (Biowhittaker), streptamycin (100 ng/ml) (Invitrogen Life Technologies), penicillin (10 U/ml) (Yamanouchi, Pharma), and 3.57 x 10–4 % (v/v) β-mercapto ethanol (Merck) (culture medium).
Cell culture and viability
Cells were cultured in culture medium for the indicated time points at 37°C in 5% CO2 atmosphere. For cytokine activation, cells were cultured in the presence or absence of a range of concentrations (0.1–10 ng/ml) of IL-7 (Strathmann) or IL-15 (R&D Systems). For combined TCR/CD28 activation, cells were cultured with plate-bound anti-CD3 mAb (0.25–1.0 µg/ml) (clone 16A9; Sanquin) in the presence or absence of soluble anti-CD28 mAb (5 µg/ml) (clone 15E8; Saquin). Cell viability was assessed on the FACS by propidium iodide (5 µg/ml) exclusion or live gating based on forward scatter/side scatter.
Real-time PCR
Total RNA was extracted from freshly isolated cells (resting) and cytokine- or TCR/CD28-stimulated T cells using GenElute Mamalian total RNA Miniprep kit (Sigma-Aldrich). Oligodeoxythymidine-primed cDNA was synthesized using avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). From these cDNA pools, specific targets where amplified by PCR performed with Lightcycler FastStart DNA Master SYBR Green I from Roche, using the sense and antisense IL-7R
primers 5'-TCGCAGCACTCACTGACC-3' and 5'-CGGGAAGGAGCCAATGAC-3', the wGFI1 primers 5'-TGACTTGGGGAAGGAATTTA-3' and 5'-CCAGTGATGAGGTTTTCACA-3', the GAPB
primers 5'-AGCATCAGTGCAATCTGCTA-3' and 5'-TTCCCAGGTGAGCTTCTATC-3' and the 18S primers 5'-GGACAACAAGCTCCGTGAAGA-3' and 5'-CAGAAGTGACGCAGCCCTCTA-3', respectively. The results were normalized to 18S rRNA.
IL-7R
cloning, retroviral constructs, and transduction
A cDNA encoding human IL-7R
was obtained via RT-PCR on RNA isolated from human naive T cells (Tap Polymerase). Forward primer: 5'-ATGAATTCCACCATGACAATTCTAGGTACAACTT-3'; reverse primer: 5'-CTCGAGTCACTGGTTTTGGTAGAAGC-3'. The forward primer has an EcoRI site followed by a Kozak sequence and a start codon. The reverse primer has a stop codon followed by a XhoI site. The PCR product was cloned into a pGEM T-vector (Promega) and after sequence verification (BigDye sequencing kit, ABI), recloned following EcoRI and XhoI digestion into the EcoRI and XhoI site of Lazarus-linker-internal ribosomal entry site (IRES)-GFP vector that has previously been published (17). Correct orientation was verified by restriction analysis. The retroviral plasmids (IL-7R
-IRES-GFP (IL-7R
) or control-IRES-GFP vector (Mock)) were transfected into the helper virus-free amphotropic producer cell line Phoenix with Fugene-6 (Roche), according to the manufacturers protocol. The medium was refreshed the next morning, and 24 h later retroviral supernatants were collected, centrifuged and frozen in cell-free aliquots at –70°C.
Transduction of total T cells or Jurkat (J16) cells was performed according to standard protocols, as described previously (16). In brief, transduction of cells was performed by 1 cycle of overnight exposure to viral supernatant on retronectin-coated (Takara Shuzo) 24-well plates. Following overnight culture, cells were washed and transferred to 24-well tissue culture-treated plates (Costar) with new medium supplemented with IL-2 (20 U/ml) and IL-15 (1 ng/ml) to maintain viability. The efficiency of transduction was estimated by determining the percentage of GFP-positive cells by flow cytometry 3 days after transduction. To remove the dead cells, transduced cells were subjected to Ficoll-Isopaque density gradient centrifugation (Nycomed, Pharma) before use.
Statistical analysis
The two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test was used for analysis of differences between groups. A p value <0.05 was considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
expression is down-regulated on T cells activated by IL-7 or TCR/CD28 engagement
We started by determining the effect of IL-7 or combined TCR/CD28 activation on the expression of IL-7R
at protein level in human naive T cells. Cells were cultured overnight (O/N) with a graded concentration of either IL-7 or anti-CD3 mAb combined with fixed doses of anti-CD28 mAb. As depicted in Fig. 1A, both stimuli induced a rapid decrease of IL-7R
cell surface expression of protein in a dose-dependent manner. Using the concentrations of both stimuli that yielded the most pronounced effect, we next evaluated the effect of prolonged activation. Naive T cells cultured in IL-7 remained IL-7R
low (Fig. 1B, upper row). In TCR/CD28-activated cells, the expression of IL-7R
was diminished compared with resting naive cells, although an increased mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was observed in cells activated for 3 days as compared with O/N stimulation (Fig. 1B, lower row). However, as the MFI from isotype control was also increased, the stickiness of 3-day TCR/CD28-activated blasts may explain the high background staining. The same results were obtained using naive CD8+ T cells (data not shown). Thus, human T cells rapidly down-regulated IL-7R
expression upon stimulation via its cognate cytokine, IL-7, or via TCR/CD28 engagement.
|
expression is differentially regulated by IL-7 and TCR/CD28-mediated signaling
It has recently been shown that IL-7 suppresses transcription of the IL-7R
gene in murine and human T cells (9, 10). Further, separate studies in humans and mice have demonstrated that IL-7R
expression is lost in T cells after antigenic stimulation (10, 11, 12, 18), although it is incompletely resolved how this is regulated at the molecular level. A comparative analysis was performed regarding the effect of IL-7 and TCR/CD28 activation on the expression of IL-7R
at both the mRNA and protein level. Naive T cells cultured in IL-7 rapidly down-regulated the IL-7R
expression (t1/2 for IL-7R
mRNA <2 h). The suppression of IL-7R
at mRNA level was sustained by prolonged culture in IL-7 (10-fold reduction) (Fig. 2A, left). IL-7R
expression was also down-regulated by TCR/CD28 activation, although with a slower initial kinetic compared with IL-7 stimulation (t1/2 for IL-7R
mRNA
4 h). Interestingly, and in contrast to IL-7 signaling, prolonged activation via TCR/CD28-engagement further decreased IL-7R
mRNA levels (ultimately to a 50-fold reduction at 72 h) (Fig. 2A, compare left and middle panel). Similar results were obtained upon TCR-engagement in the absence of CD28 and using naive CD8+ T (data not shown). At the protein level, the disappearance of IL-7R
from the cell surface followed a similar kinetic, with a more rapid down-regulation in presence of IL-7. At the 20 h time point, the lost of IL-7R
was equivalent on both populations (Fig. 2A ii). The combined activation by both stimuli induced a profound down-regulation of IL-7R
both at mRNA (with t1/2 for IL-7R
mRNA around 2 h) and protein level (Fig. 2A). To investigate the impact of IL-7 and TCR/CD28 activation on the recovery of IL-7R
expression, cells activated for either 20 or 72 h were washed thoroughly and cultured in medium for an additional 7 h. Naive T cells rapidly up-regulated IL-7R
mRNA and protein following IL-7-withdrawal either in short or prolonged cultures. After removal of the stimulus, TCR/CD28-activated cells remained, however, IL-7R
low both at mRNA and protein level during the same period (Fig. 2B, compare right and left panels). Our data demonstrated that, in contrast to the transient effect of IL-7, TCR/CD28-mediated signaling had a chronic impact on the expression of IL-7R
.
|
expression by IL-7- and TCR/CD28-mediated signaling entails new protein synthesis
The effect of IL-7 and TCR/CD28 activation on the transcription of IL-7R
mRNA suggested the existence of a mechanism that suppressed the IL-7R
gene. To evaluate whether this process was dependent on new transcription and protein synthesis, naive T cells were activated with either stimuli in the presence of ActD (inhibiting transcription) or CHX (inhibiting translation). Both treatments partially blocked the TCR/CD28- or IL-7-induced down-regulation of IL-7R
(Fig. 3A). Likewise, the recovery of IL-7R
was blocked following IL-7 withdrawal (Fig. 3B). A further reduction in IL-7R
expression was noted in previously TCR/CD28-activated cells and similar results were obtained using naive CD8+ T cells (data not shown). Recent observations have shown that the expression of murine IL-7R
is regulated by the transcriptional repressor GFI-1 and the transcription factor GABP
(9, 19). We analyzed whether these genes were differentially regulated at the transcription level by the two distinct stimuli in human naive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Yet, neither IL-7 nor TCR/CD28 activation significantly altered the expression of GABP
and GFI-1 in either subset (data not shown). Thus, although suppression of IL-7R
expression by both IL-7- and TCR/CD28-mediated signaling is an active process dependent on both new transcription and protein synthesis, the molecular factors regulating this process in human T cells remain to be identified.
|

The majority of memory CD8+ T cells specific for persistent viruses, e.g., CMV, lack expression of IL-7R
. It has been implied that this reflects a constant contact with Ag during latency that drive T cells into a more differentiated stage (11, 18). Based on phenotypic distinctions (20, 21), we tested whether IL-7R
expression would be altered in different T cell subsets, including CMV-specific cells, once removed from their in vivo environment. Overall, IL-7R
was expressed in the majority of the subsets, but effector CD27–CD45RA+ CD8+ T cells. Memory T cells exhibited consistently higher levels of IL-7R
as compared with naive T cells. IL-7R
low cells were predominantly found in effector CD27–CD45RA+ CD8+ T cells and in small fraction of both CD4 and CD8 T cells included within the CD27–CD45RA+ and CD27–CD45RA– gate, respectively (Fig. 4A). Culture in medium enhanced IL-7R
expression in CD4+ T cell subsets, but not in CD27–CD45RA+ CD4+ T cells (data not shown). Within the CD8+ T cell subset, both naive and memory cells upreguated IL7R
expression, whereas CD45RA+CD27– T cells did not (Fig. 4B i). Up-regulation was blocked by treatment with Act D and CHX, suggesting that IL-7R
expression was actively restrained in vivo (data not shown). Yet, effector-type CD8+ T cells remained IL-7R
low after in vitro culture. Similarly, T cells that were activated through CMV infection in vivo, and that showed for the majority the same effector phenotype, failed to re-express IL-7R
(Fig. 4B ii). Thus, in peripheral blood, IL-7R
low T cells were only found in fully differentiated cells and those cells apparently lost the ability to re-express this receptor. Thus, chronic activation in vivo, as for CMV, has profound consequences on IL-7R
expression.
|
does not hinder responsiveness of naive T cells to IL-7
Having established a distinct effect of IL-7 or TCR/CD28 activation on the expression of IL-7R
, we next investigated whether these differences were functionally relevant. Recently, it has been suggested that suppression of IL-7R
by IL-7 constitutes a mechanism to regulate IL-7 consumption by naive T cells (9). Accordingly, down-regulation of IL-7R
in IL-7-signaled cells would facilitate the use of IL-7 by IL-7R
high naive T cells. To test this for human T cells, a competitive assay was performed assessing the responsiveness of IL-7R
low and IL-7R
high naive T cells to IL-7, using CFSE as a tag (Fig. 5A). In mixed cultures, IL-7R
low naive T cells proliferated only in presence of a high concentration of IL-7 (Fig. 5B, lower panel). At intermediate and lower doses of IL-7, viability was sustained in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 5C, upper panel). Yet, analyses of the ratios between IL-7R
low and IL-7R
high naive T cells, included in the total viable gate, demonstrated that both populations had identical survival or proliferative capacity at all concentrations of IL-7 (Fig. 5C, bottom panel). To exclude side effects of CFSE, IL-7R
high naive T cells were labeled with CFSE with identical results (Fig. 5, A and B and data not shown). The expression of IL-7R
was transient as both populations displayed similar levels of the receptor once cultured in different doses of IL-7 (Fig. 5D). To measure the responsiveness of IL-7R
low and IL-7R
high naive T cells to IL-7 at an earlier time point, we monitored the ability to both subsets to activate STAT5, a bona-fide down-stream target of IL-7 signaling (4). Upon short culture in IL-7, STAT5 phosphorylation was equivalent in both subsets, although the initial basal level of phosphorylated STAT5 was higher in IL-7R
low cells compared with IL-7R
high cells (Fig. 5E). Overall, our data suggest that the proliferative and survival response of IL-7R
low and IL-7R
high naive T cells to IL-7 was indistinguishable.
|
low cells display a limited responsiveness to IL-7
In parallel, we tested whether the persisting down-regulation of IL-7R
on T cells by TCR/CD28 signaling would influence IL-7 responsiveness (Fig. 6A). The survival and proliferative capacity of TCR/CD28-activated cells were assessed following culture in the presence of a graded concentration of IL-7 and IL-15. In the absence of cytokines, cell viability and numbers dropped dramatically within 2 days (Fig. 6). Addition of IL-7 only affected T cell viability at a high concentration. Under this condition a subtle increase in viable cell numbers was observed, suggesting that cells slightly divided in response to higher amounts of IL-7 (Fig. 6, B and C, left panel). Conversely, the responsiveness to IL-15 was higher, with dose-dependent effects on both viability and cell numbers (Fig. 6, B and C, right panels). The apoptosis of activated T cells was also inhibited at 1 ng/ml IL-2 (data not shown). These data suggest that, in concordance with the strong down-regulation of IL-7R
induced by TCR/CD28, activated T cells displayed a limited ability to respond to IL-7.
|
expression on TCR/CD28-activated cells confers a selective advantage to IL-7
The observations that IL-7R
is prominently down-regulated by TCR/CD28-mediated signaling and that TCR-activated cells have a poor response to IL-7 prompted us to test whether these two phenomena are strictly related. We addressed the functional consequences of retrovirally driven expression of IL-7R
on the survival and expansion of TCR/CD28-activated T cells to IL-7. To validate the viral construct, IL-7R
-negative Jurkat cells were transduced with retrovirus-expressing human IL-7R
-IRES-GFP (IL-7R
) (Fig. 7A). Next, primary T cells were transduced with retrovirus-expressing human IL-7R
-IRES-GFP (IL-7R
) or retrovirus containing empty expression vector (Mock) (Fig. 7B). Transduction efficiencies, expressed as percentage of GFP+ cells, ranged between 10 and 25%. The expression of IL-7R
was heterogeneous in control cells, both Mock GFP– and GFP+ cells, and IL-7R
-GFP– cells. In IL-7R
-GFP+ cells was detected a substantial increase in the expression of IL-7R
. IL-7 activation down-regulated the cell surface levels of the endogenous as the exogenous IL-7R
-chain. Thus, the IL-7R
-chain was undetectable at cell surface even when its expression was driven by a constitutive active promoter, indicating protein cellular redistribution. Yet, and contrasting with control cells, the expression of IL-7R
was sustained in IL-7R
-GFP+ cells following TCR/CD28-activation (Fig. 7C). Thus, our data suggest that the cell surface expression of exogenous IL-7R
was regulated by IL-7 as the endogenous chain, but not by TCR/CD28-activation. Subsequently, we determined the competitive fitness of transduced cells in prolonged cultures supplemented with a high concentration of IL-7 (10 ng/ml) every 4 days. During the course of the experiment, cells did not expand considerably (data not shown, comparable to Fig. 6C) and cell survival was maintained (Fig. 7D, left). Strikingly, IL-7R
-GFP+ cells exhibited a selective initial advantage to IL-7 compared with control cells (Fig. 7D, right). Thus, constitutive expression of IL-7R
increased the response of TCR/CD28-activated T cells to IL-7 and suggests that TCR-induced down-modulation of IL-7R
is a major factor in limiting the response of Ag-activated T cells to IL-7.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-chain, which is part of the dimeric IL-7 receptor, is pivotal for T cell homeostasis. Its tight regulation has been suggested to be an essential mechanism to limit IL-7 consumption (5, 9, 22). We compared the impact of IL-7 and TCR/CD28 on the expression of this receptor in human naive T cells and demonstrated that IL-7 and TCR/CD28 activation differentially regulates IL-7R
expression in a transient or chronic manner, respectively. These differences are reflected on the ability of cells to respond to IL-7. In contrast to IL-7 activation, the down-regulation of IL-7R
by TCR/CD28 stimulation limits IL-7 responsiveness. Strikingly, ectopic expression of IL-7R
on TCR/CD28-activated cells augments the responsiveness to IL-7, indicating that TCR signaling may impact the response of T cells to IL-7 by restraining the expression of its cognate receptor.
It has been demonstrated that suppression of murine IL-7R
expression by IL-7 entails newly synthesized proteins (9). Our data demonstrate an equivalent dynamic mechanism in the human system, regulating the suppression of IL-7R
by IL-7 or TCR/CD28 activation (Fig. 3). Recent data have shown that GFI-1 is a key transcriptional repressor involved in IL-7-induced suppression of the mouse IL-7R
gene, specifically in naive CD8+ T cells. Yet, the mechanism in CD4+ T cells remains to be deciphered (9). Furthermore, the transcriptional factor GABP
has been shown to regulate IL-7R
expression in mouse T cells (19). In line with a previous study by Kim et al. (24), we found no clear association between expression of IL-7R
and GFI-1 or GABP
in human lymphocytes, except a subtle increased in GFI-1 expression in naive CD8+ T cells culture with IL-7 (data not shown). Thus, in human lymphocytes, the expression of IL-7R
appears to be regulated in a GFI-1- or GABP
-independent manner.
In the absence of IL-7 and IL-7R
, the homeostasis of naive T cells is severely compromised in both humans and mice (1, 2, 25, 26, 27). Hence, the transient effect of IL-7 in the expression of IL-7R
in naive T cells (Fig. 2 and 3) may constitute a homeostatic mechanism to maintain the responsiveness of these cells to IL-7. As IL-7 is suggested to be limiting in vivo (5, 6, 7), the active regulation of IL-7 responsiveness is necessary for T cell homeostasis (9, 22). Recently, it has been proposed that suppression of IL-7R
constitutes a mechanism to maximize the use of IL-7 (9). In this viewpoint, down-regulation of IL-7R
on naive T following contact with IL-7 remove signaled-cells from the cellular competitive pool allowing other unsignalled naive cells to bind IL-7. Although our in vitro experimental setting may differ from an in vivo context in terms of the bioavailability of IL-7 signals, we found no evidence of this altruistic model in a competitive assay using limiting amounts of IL-7. In fact, the survival and proliferative response to IL-7 of naive T cells expressing high or low levels of IL-7R
is indistinguishable even in presence of limiting amounts of IL-7 (Fig. 5). The cell surface detection of IL-7R
is prevented as long as IL-7 is present. In this scenario, a continuous and sufficient newly formed IL-7R
protein may be shuttled to the cell surface allowing naive cells to received IL-7-mediated survival signals. Accordingly, the short term response of IL-7R
low naive T cells to IL-7, monitored by the ability to activate STAT5, was equivalent to the one IL-7R
high counterparts (Fig. 5D). Thus, we reason that the IL-7R
locus is not completely suppressed by IL-7 signaling. Analyses of the recovery of IL-7R
expression following IL-7 withdrawal substantiate this hypothesis (Fig. 2B). Yet, the biological significance of IL-7R
down-regulation remains undetermined. Our previous data suggest that the proliferative response of cells to IL-7 is more limited, in terms of number of divisions, as compared with other homeostatic cytokines as IL-15 (8, 15). From this perspective, a continuous expression of IL-7R
in T cells may favor unwarranted IL-7-driven proliferation. Thus, the down-regulation of IL-7R
by IL-7 may have evolved as a homeostatic mechanism to dampen IL-7-driven expansion. It is worth noting that the ectopic expression of IL-7R
on TCR-activated T cells (Fig. 7) did not confer an enormous proliferative advantage to IL-7, suggesting that the responsiveness to IL-7 may also be regulated at different level, apart of the expression of the cognate receptor.
Compared with IL-7, the impact of TCR/CD28 triggering was more prominent on the expression of IL-7R
(Fig. 2A). Additionally, the recovery of IL-7R
expression was inhibited in TCR/CD28-activated cells during the periods analyzed (7–10 h) (Fig. 2B). Similar observations were obtained 24 h after activation (data not shown). In retrovirally transduced cells, we observed that IL-7R
expression was partially retained 3 days after TCR/CD28 activation in cells cultured in low doses of IL-2 and IL-15 (Fig. 7C). Our results are in line with the data by Xue et al. (13) demonstrating that the expression of IL-7R
can be partially recovered on murine T cells following prolonged culture. A closer look at the data showed that the levels of the re-expressed IL-7R
were 2-fold lower as compared with naive cells (13), suggesting that TCR/CD28-activated cells do not have the ability to fully recover IL-7R
, again contrasting with IL-7 stimulation. Although strong TCR stimulation of T cells provokes down-regulation of IL-7R
(Fig. 2), it may be difficult to generate cells that remain completely IL-7R
negative in vitro. The situation appears to be different in vivo, in which IL-7R
is lost on fully differentiated CD27–CD45RA+/– CD8+ T cells and CD27–CD45RA+ CD4+ T cells, the last a small subset that is present in around 20% of the donors analyzed (Fig. 4) (11, 28, 29). The percentage of CD27–CD45RA+ CD8+ T cells is significantly increased in the peripheral blood of CMV-infected individuals (20, 30). Interestingly, during latency CMV-specific CD8 T cells remained for the majority IL-7R
negative (Fig. 4B) (11), an observation linked to presumed frequent Ag contact provoked by persistent CMV infection (11, 31). The exclusive impaired capacity of both effector and CMV-specific CD8+ T cells to recover IL-7R
expression once removed from their microenvironment (Fig. 4) may be a consequence of the strength, quality, and/or duration of stimulation received by T cells that result in epigenetic modifications in the IL-7R
locus. Accordingly, Kim et al. have shown that terminally differentiated IL-7R
low CD8+ T cells have increased methylation in the IL-7R
gene promoter compared with IL-7R
high CD8+ T cells (32). However, the methylation of the IL-7R
locus is not augmented via prolonged in vitro TCR activation (32), which suggest that other signals, possibly costimulatory or cytokine mediated, contribute to the cessation of the IL-7R
promoter in vivo.
Activated T cells differentially express several cytokine receptors during the course of an immune response. Concomitantly with the loss of IL-7R
, activated cells up-regulate the expression of other cytokine-receptors as IL-2R
, IL-2Rβ, and IL-15R
(4). It is accepted that these changes in the repertoire of cytokine receptors consign activated cells under the influence of other homeostatic cytokines. Our data demonstrate that, in line with a strong suppression of IL-7R
gene (Fig. 2), TCR/CD28-activate cells possess an inadequate response to IL-7. Yet, absence of IL-7R
will not impact the survival of activated cells as long as other homeostatic cytokines are available, such as IL-15 (Fig. 6). In murine models, it has been postulated that the expression of IL-7R
on the small subset of activated T cells during a primary immune response defines the population of cells that constitute the pool of long-lived memory cells (12, 14). Yet, it is not completely clear whether these memory cell precursors re-express de novo or have maintained the IL-7R
expression and if the same occurs in CD4+ T cells compartment. Regardless of this uncertainty, the expression of IL-7R
expression on activated CD8 T cells appears to be mandatory, yet not sufficient, to mediate their transition into the stable Ag-independent memory pool (33, 34). As one may expect, the formation of a stable memory pool is an intricate and integrated process regulated at distinct levels apart from the expression of a cell surface receptor. Our data suggest that ectopic expression of IL-7R
on activated T cells confers a selective advantage in the response to IL-7 (Fig. 7). These differences may have a considerable importance at biological level. Interestingly, a recent paper by Lefrancois and colleagues has demonstrated that both IL-7R
regulation and CD8 T cell memory formation occurs in IL-7-independent manner (35). We do not exclude the possibility that sustained IL-7R
expression in activated T cells confers a competitive advantage to other homeostatic factors, such as thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP). IL-7R
can form heterodimers with the TSLP receptor to specifically binds TSLP (36). Deciphering the precise role of IL-7R
in the generation of memory T cells constitutes an upcoming challenge.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Disclosures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 This study was funded by VICI and research (912-04-032) grants both from Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) to R.A.W. van Lier. ![]()
2 Current address: Unite des Cytokines et Developpment Lymphoide, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France. ![]()
3 Current address: Department of Immunology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037. ![]()
4 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. R.A.W. van Lier, Academic Medical Center, Laboratory for Experimental Immunology K0-146, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail address: r.vanlier{at}amc.uva.nl ![]()
5 Abbreviations used in this paper: CHX, cyclohexamide; Act D, actinomycin D; IRES, internal ribosomal entry site; O/N, overnight; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity; TSLP, thymic stromal lymphopoietin. ![]()
Received for publication July 26, 2007. Accepted for publication February 3, 2008.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
transcription by IL-7 and other prosurvival cytokines: a novel mechanism for maximizing IL-7-dependent T cell survival. Immunity 21: 289-302. [Medline]
gene expression is inversely correlated with cell cycle progression in IL-7-stimulated T lymphocytes. J. Immunol. 176: 6702-6708.
chain expression distinguishes functional subsets of virus-specific human CD8+ T cells. Blood 106: 2091-2098.
chain expression in activated T lymphocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 13759-13764.
-chain gene expression in T cells. Nat. Immunol. 5: 1036-1044. [Medline]
expression with aging and the potential implications of IL-7 therapy on CD8+ T cell immune responses. Blood 107: 2855-2862. [Medline]
expression in human T cells via DNA methylation. J. Immunol. 178: 5473-5479.
is necessary but not sufficient for the formation of memory CD8 T cells during viral infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 10: 11730-11735.
expression and memory CD8 T cell development. J. Immunol. 177: 4247-4251. This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Rose, O. Lambotte, C. Pallier, J.-F. Delfraissy, and J.-H. Colle Identification and Biochemical Characterization of Human Plasma Soluble IL-7R: Lower Concentrations in HIV-1-Infected Patients J. Immunol., June 15, 2009; 182(12): 7389 - 7397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |