|
|
||||||||



* Department of Veterans Affairs New York Harbor Healthcare System and Department of Pathology,
Department of Pharmacology and Kimmel Center for Biology and Medicine at the Skirball Institute, and
Department of Biochemistry, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CD4 T cells typically recognize short peptide fragments derived from exogenous Ags that are internalized and processed by professional APCs and presented as MHC class II (MHC-II)3 -peptide complexes on the cell surface (reviewed in Ref. 16). Thus, Ag processing, conducted by an array of endolysosomal proteases, is a critical step frequently required for the generation of most CD4 T cell epitopes (17). Specific aspartic and cysteine proteases have been shown to be necessary for the processing of certain Ags, such as the asparagine-specific endopeptidase required in the initial cleavage of tetanus toxoid C fragment (18), but little is currently known about the complete range of enzymes and enzymatic processes involved in processing individual Ags. The processing of antigenic proteins with posttranslational modifications is even less well understood, even though many of the peptide epitopes recognized by T cells are derived from proteins that are posttranslationally modified by acetylation (19), isoaspartylation (20), phosphorylation (21), or glycosylation (22, 23).
Many viral Ags that are important targets for the immune system are glycoproteins. The HIV envelope gp120, for example, is so highly glycosylated that the glycans (20–30 per molecule) account for half of the m.w. of this molecule. Although CD4 T cells have been found occasionally to recognize epitopes that contain few sugar residues or other modifications (22, 23, 24), most CD4 T cell epitopes are typically devoid of large carbohydrates. Indeed, heavy glycosylation on Ags, such as tumor Ags MUC1 and HER-2/neu, has been shown to hinder intracellular transport and processing in dendritic cells, rendering these Ags to be poorly immunogenic (25, 26). Interestingly, the presence of an N-linked glycosylation located outside the T cell epitope has also been shown to interfere with CD4 T cell recognition of influenza hemagglutinin Ag (27, 28), although the mechanisms by which such a glycan exerts its effect are not completely clear. In addition to steric hindrance that prevents peptide binding to MHC-II or restricts the proteolytic enzymes from having access to the proteolytic cleavage sites, the presence of large carbohydrate moieties on the protein surface also affects the folding and secondary or tertiary conformation of the protein Ag (29), thereby influencing the way the Ag is processed and presented on MHC-II (30).
Although many studies have shown the profound effects of N-linked glycans on the envelope gp120 of HIV or SIV on Ab and CD8 T cell responses to these Ags (31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38), very little is known about how these glycans affect gp120 Ag processing and its MHC-II presentation to the CD4 T cells. Previous studies have shown that CD4 T cell epitopes tend to cluster at specific nonglycosylated gp120 regions that are flanked with multiple N-linked glycosylation sites (39, 40), but it is not known how these N-glycans actually influence CD4 T cell recognition of gp120 epitopes. Botarelli et al. demonstrated that 20% of the CD4 T cell clones obtained from humans immunized with a recombinant, nonglycosylated form of gp120 failed to respond to glycosylated gp120 of the same HIV-1 isolate (41). They further identified that one of the epitopes recognized by such clones contained two asparagines that were glycosylated in the native glycosylated gp120 and therefore were not efficiently recognized by the CD4 T cells (41), indicating that the presence of N-linked glycans within or near to an epitope can have a serious impact on its recognition by CD4 T cells. However, the obstructive effects of N-linked glycosylation on CD4 T cell recognition are not a universal phenomenon (22, 23, 24).
In this study, we investigated the contribution of three conserved glycosylation sites flanking the CD4 T cell epitope cluster in the C4 region of gp120 (designated G1, G2, and G3 at positions 406, 448, and 463, respectively). The glycosylation sites at N406 and N463 have been shown to bear complex oligosaccharides, while high mannose or hybrid glycans have been found at N448 (42). Previously, elimination of these three N-linked glycans was shown not to increase exposure of known neutralizing epitopes or uncover new B cell epitopes (43, 44). However, immunization with gp120 lacking these three glycans resulted in the loss of T cell responses to a specific epitope located in the nearby C4 region (45), although the mechanism(s) by which the N-linked glycans affect the T cell recognition were not at all understood. To investigate this issue, we produced gp120 proteins lacking single or triple glycans at these three positions and examined their recognition by CD4 T cell lines specific for the C4 epitopes or other distant epitopes. We identified that the N-linked glycan at position 448 was absolutely necessary for the CD4 T cell recognition of the C4 epitopes. We further demonstrated by trypsin digestion and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (MS) that the loss of this particular N-glycan rendered the C4 region of gp120 more resistant to proteolytic digestion, thereby hindering the release and presentation of the C4 epitopes. Hence, N-glycans located near CD4 T cell epitopes on HIV gp120 are critical determinants for efficient processing, generation, and consequently the recognition of these epitopes by the T cells.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recombinant baculovirus-derived gp120IIIB purchased from ImmunoDiagnostics was used for in vitro antigenic stimulation to expand the primary CD4 T cells specific for the different gp120 epitopes. Gp120BH10 proteins with the wild-type (WT) sequence and with various N-to-Q mutations tested in this study were generated in our laboratory as described below. Synthetic gp120 peptides were provided by the National Institutes of Health AIDS Reagent Repository or the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control Centre for AIDS Reagents, except for the gp120 peptide (residues 432–452) with an N-to-Q mutation at position 448, which was purchased from Global Peptide. Peptides AQUA-C4 (MYAPPISGQI*R) and AQUA-C2 (VSFEPIPIHYCAPAGFAIL*K) bearing 13C and 15N-labeled K or R residues were purchased from Sigma-Genosys. Human gp120-specific mAbs used in this study were generous gifts from Drs. Susan Zolla-Pazner (New York University School of Medicine) James Robinson (Tulane University School of Medicine), and Abraham Pinter (Public Health Research Institute), as well as from Drs. Hermann Katinger (2G12), Dennis Burton, and Carlos Barbas (b12) through the National Institutes of Health AIDS Reagent Repository Program.
CD4 T cells
Primary HIV-1 gp120-specific CD4 T cell lines PS01, PS02, and PS05 were generated from PBMCs of chronically infected HIV-1 patients and have been maintained as short-term cultures (
8 wk) by in vitro stimulation with irradiated autologous PBMCs treated with gp120IIIB in the presence of IL-2 (Roche) (46). These human CD4 T cells recognize the dominant epitopes in the C1, C2, and C4 regions of gp120 (Fig. 1). All subjects whose cells were used to establish the T cell lines gave informed consent, and the study was reviewed and approved by the Veterans Affairs New York Harbor Healthcare System Institutional Review Board. A gp120-specific mouse CD4 T cell clone T1 was provided by Drs. Jeffrey Ahler and Jay Berzofsky (National Institutes of Health). This line recognizes an epitope in C4 region of gp120 that partially overlaps with that of PS05 (Fig. 1) (47). Gp120 peptide-pulsed irradiated syngeneic mouse splenocytes were used as APCs to stimulate the T cells.
|
The pEE14 vector expressing glutamine synthetase and HIV-1 glycoprotein gp120BH10 genes was obtained from Dr. Simon Jeffs (Division of Medicine, Imperial College, London U.K.) via Dr. Luigi Buonaguro (Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Fondazione "G. Pascale", Napoli, Italy) (48). The gp120BH10 gene and an upstream tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) signal peptide sequence were amplified using the Expand Long Template PCR System (Roche). The primers introduced unique HindIII and EcoRI restriction sites upstream and downstream of the amplified fragment. The tPA-gp120BH10 cassette was then inserted into pUC19 to make a template construct for introducing the N-to-Q mutations that remove N-linked glycosylation sites at positions 406, 448, and 463 (designated G1, G2 and G3) (Fig. 1). The three pairs of primers designed to introduce these mutations are as follows: pair 1: 5'-TGGAGTACTAAAGGGTCACAGAACACTGAAGGAAGTGACA-3' and 5'-TGTCACTTCCTTCAGTGTTCTGTGACCCTTTAGTACTCCA-3'; pair 2: 5'-TGGACAAATTAGATGTTCATCACAGATTACAGGGCTGCTATTAACAAG-3' and 5'-CTTGTTAATAGCAGCCCTGTAATCTGTGATGAACATCTAAT TTGTCCA-3'; pair 3: 5'-TGGTGGTAATAGCAACCAGGAGTCCGAGATCTTCAGAC-3' and 5'-GTCTGAAGATCTCGGACTCCTGGTTGCTATTACCACCA-3'). Site-directed mutagenesis was performed with the QuikChange XL Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene) according to the manufacturers instructions. The entire gp120 gene of each mutant was sequenced to confirm that the specific mutations were introduced successfully without any other changes. To introduce multiple mutations, each mutagenesis was done sequentially. After the mutations were introduced, the tPA-gp120BH10 cassette was then removed from pUC19 and inserted back to the pEE14-expressing vector for transfection and expression of soluble gp120 in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells.
Expression and purification of gp120 proteins
Transfection of CHO-L761h cells with the pEE14 expression vector was performed by calcium phosphate precipitation. The selection of stable clones was conducted by glutamine depletion (48). Briefly, transfected cells were selected by growing in glutamine-free DMEM media (SAFC Biosciences) supplemented with 10% of glutamine-free FCS and nonessential amino acids. Additionally, L-methionine sulfoximine was added to inhibit the endogenous L-glutamine synthesis gene. Detection of gp120 in the culture supernatant was done by an in-house sandwich ELISA with sheep anti-C5 Ab (Cliniqa) and a mAb specific to the V3 region of gp120 (694-98D). Clones with stable gp120 expression were selected for large-scale gp120 production.
Stably transfected clones were expanded in T75 flasks in the presence of 200 µM of L-methionine sulfoximine. Supernatants were collected every 3–4 days and stored at –80°C. Gp120 proteins were purified from the supernatants by affinity chromatography using the anti-V3 mAb 694-98D coupled to an AminoLink plus coupling gel column (Pierce Biotechnology). Fractions containing most of the gp120 proteins were collected and dialyzed against PBS. Purified proteins were aliquoted and stored at –80°C until use. Purity of each gp120 preparation was assessed by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie blue staining, and their concentrations were determined by the Bio-Rad AC DC protein assay.
mAb reactivities and function of gp120 proteins
ELISA to detect mAb binding to gp120 proteins was done as previously described (49). Gp120 proteins were captured onto the wells by sheep anti-C5 Abs (Cliniqa) and reacted with different human anti-gp120 mAbs. Detection of the mAb binding was done using alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-human IgG (Sigma-Aldrich). CD4 binding was detected similarly using the mouse anti-CD4 mAb OKT4 and alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG.
The capacity of the WT or mutant proteins to mediate virus entry was determined using single-cycle pseudovirions in U87-CD4+CXCR4+ and TZM-bl cells. A 580-bp BglII fragment of gp120BH10 was cloned into the HXB2-env backbone (50). The pseudovirions were then generated by transfecting 293T cells with the envelope constructs along with pSV-rev (51, 52) and Env-defective pNL4-3.LucR-E- (53, 54). Virus infectivity was assessed by infecting the target U87 or TZM-bl cells with each of the pseudovirions at the same amounts of p24 and/or RT. The luciferase activity was measured 48 h after infection. The following reagents were obtained through the AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program (Division of AIDS, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health): pNL4-3.Luc.R-E- from Dr. Nathaniel Landau, HXB2-env from Dr. Kathleen Page and Dr. Dan Littman, and pSV-rev from Dr. Marie-Louis Hammarskjold and Dr. David Rekosh.
T cell proliferation assay
T cell proliferation was assessed by the standard [3H]thymidine incorporation assay as described previously (49). Autologous PBMCs or mouse splenocytes were irradiated (12,000 rad) and treated with Ags for 18–22 h before use as APCs in the assay. In some experiments, EBV-transformed autologous B lymphoblastoid cells treated with 0.5% of formaldehyde were used as APCs. T cell responses to APCs alone in the absence of any Ag were determined in each assay as background proliferation. Each experimental condition was tested in triplicate, and all experiments were performed at least twice.
In vitro proteolysis of gp120
Digestions of gp120 by endolysosomal fractions isolated from B lymphoblastoid cell lines were done according to a previously published protocol (55). Gp120 proteins were incubated with lysosomal fraction (0.75 million cell equivalents per µg of gp120) overnight at 37°C in 0.08 M of sodium acetate buffer at pH 5. The kinetics of gp120 digestion were determined by measuring intact gp120 remaining over time in the reaction using a sandwich ELISA with Abs specific for the C and N termini of gp120 (49).
Trypsin digestion and MALDI-TOF MS analysis
Denatured and native nondenatured gp120 proteins (2.5 µg) were digested by trypsin (0.5 µg) overnight at 37°C in 10 µl of 25 mM NH4HCO3 buffer (pH 8). Before digestion, all samples were filtered using C18 ZipTips (Millipore). To denature the proteins, samples were dried, reconstituted with urea, and incubated with DTT for 1 h at 56°C. The samples were then treated with iodoacetamide in the absence of light for 30 min. Digestion reaction was terminated by adding formic acid. The digested products were then analyzed by MALDI-TOF MS (TofSpec 2E, Waters Micromass).
To quantify the amounts of specific gp120 peptides generated by trypsin digestion, AQUA peptides were synthesized with identical amino acid sequences but bearing 13C- and 15N-labeled K or R terminal residues. A known concentration of the AQUA peptide was mixed with the gp120 digestion products, filtered using C18 ZipTips, and analyzed by MS as described above. The amounts of gp120 peptides in the digestion reactions were calculated according to the following equation: AreaAQUA/ConcentrationAQUA = Areasample/Concentrationsample, with AreaAQUA and Areasample representing the areas under the monoisotopic peaks for the AQUA or sample peptides in the MALDI-TOF spectra.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses for comparing mutant proteins with the WT gp120 were performed using one-way ANOVA with Dunnetts posttests or two-way ANOVA with Bonferronis posttests (GraphPad Prism 4).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Because most CD4 T cell epitopes cluster in gp120 regions that are flanked by N-linked glycosylation sites, we sought to determine the role of these N-linked glycans in the generation and recognition of the CD4 T cell epitopes. In this study, we focused on three highly conserved N-linked glycosylation sites at positions 406, 448, and 463 that flank the C4 epitope cluster, and we examined the effects of removing each of these glycans on CD4 T cell recognition of the C4 epitopes vs the more distant C1 or C2 epitopes (Fig. 1). Soluble recombinant gp120 proteins were produced with single N-to-Q mutations at each of the respective glycosylation sites (
G1,
G2, and
G3) or with triple mutations (
G123). The proteins were secreted from stably transfected CHO cell lines and affinity purified from the culture supernatant to attain >90% purity as confirmed by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 2A). Fig. 2A also shows the electrophoretic mobilities of the mutant proteins as compared with the WT protein. The
G1,
G2, and
G3 proteins migrated slightly faster than did the WT protein, consistent with a reduction of
2–3 kDa in their apparent molecular mass due to the loss of one glycan, while the
G123 protein had the lowest apparent molecular mass, confirming the lack of three N-linked glycans in this protein. MS analysis of the tryptic fragments from
G1 and
G2 also confirmed the loss of N-linked glycans at positions 406 and 448, respectively (Fig. 2B). The WT and mutant gp120 proteins all displayed similar MS spectra, except for the appearance of peptides GSQ406NTEGSDTITLPCR (m/z of 1679.8) and CSSQ448ITGLLTR (m/z of 1291.7) in the
G1 and
G2 spectra, respectively. The corresponding WT peptides with N406 and N448 were not detected in the MS spectrum, due to the additional mass of the attached oligosaccharides at G1 or G2. These data confirm both the amino acid changes and the specific glycan removals in the
G1 and
G2 proteins.
|
To determine whether the removal of single or triple N-glycans caused significant alterations in gp120 conformation and function, the ability of mutated proteins to bind to soluble CD4 was tested in ELISA. All of the mutants retained their capacity to bind CD4, although
G2 consistently displayed a small decrease in CD4 binding as compared with WT and the other mutants (p < 0.001) (Fig. 2C). Interestingly, the
G123 mutant had CD4 binding comparable to the WT protein, possibly reflecting the compensatory effects of the
G1 and/or
G3 on the CD4-binding activity of the
G2 mutant. Nevertheless, these changes are relatively minor; the loss of N-glycans at positions 406, 448, and 463, either singly or jointly, did not have detrimental effects on the capacity of gp120 to bind CD4. We also observed that when these mutations were introduced to the envelope of pseudovirions, the viruses remained infectious. In fact, when tested in U87-CD4+CXCR4+ and TZM-bl cell lines, the infectivity levels of pseudovirions bearing the mutated envelopes (
G1,
G2,
G3, and
G123) were enhanced, ranging from 134 to 216% as compared with those of the WT virus. These data are consistent with previous findings from other laboratories (56, 57); however, whether these mutant viruses also showed comparable or slightly enhanced infectivity in primary target cells such as PBMCs remains to be determined. Hence, the minor changes in CD4 binding capacity of these mutants do not appear to seriously alter the envelope functions and virus infectivity.
To further probe for structural changes in the mutated gp120 proteins, the mutant proteins were examined for their reactivity with mAbs directed to different regions of gp120, including the conformation-dependent C1/C5 epitope (C11), the CD4 binding site (b12, 38G3, 1125H, and 654), the N-terminal C1 region (EH21), the V3 loop (447), and an epitope involving mannose residues in the C3 and V4 regions (2G12). The mutant and WT gp120 proteins displayed similar reactivities with most of the mAbs tested (Fig. 2D). Only small, albeit statistically significant, alterations were observed in the reactivities of
G2 with mAbs EH21, 447, and C11, as well as in the reactivity of
G1 with mAb 2G12. Interestingly, unlike the single
G1 and
G2 mutants, the
G123 mutant did not show any significant difference in its reactivities with the mAbs tested, suggesting the potential compensatory effects of these three mutations. Overall, these results indicate that removal of the single or triple N-glycans and the N-to-Q substitutions introduced at the three conserved glycosylation sites did not greatly alter the overall gp120 conformation or function.
CD4 T cell recognition of gp120 proteins lacking single or triple N-linked glycans
To examine whether removal of N-glycans flanking the CD4 T cell epitope-rich area in the C4 region affected CD4 T cell recognition of gp120, we measured CD4 T cell proliferation in response to the mutant vs WT gp120 proteins. Three human CD4 T cell lines (PS01, PS02, and PS05) and a mouse CD4 T cell clone (T1) specific for different gp120 epitopes were tested (Fig. 3). The C1-specific PS01 and C2-specific PS02 lines recognized each of the four mutants as well as the WT (p > 0.05). However, the C4-specific PS05 line failed to respond to the
G2 and
G123 mutants at all concentrations tested (p < 0.001 when compared with WT). This particular line also responded poorly to
G2 when tested at 5 µg/ml (with stimulation index of 2, as compared with stimulation index of 11.5 for WT). Reduced recognition of
G2 and
G123 was also observed with the C4-specific clone T1 (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively). In contrast, PS05 responded well to both
G1 and
G3 at each of the concentrations tested (p > 0.05 as compared with WT). The T1 responses to
G1 and
G3 were also not significantly different from those against the WT protein (p > 0.05). These results demonstrate that the
G2 mutation at position 448 specifically affected CD4 T cell epitopes located in the nearby C4 region, and not those located in the more distant C1 or C2 regions.
|
G2 is not likely due to the N-to-Q substitution introduced to position 448 of the mutant gp120. Rather, the data support the idea that the loss of an N-linked glycan at this C4 site may affect the way CD4 T cell epitopes derived from this particular region of gp120 are processed and presented. Ag processing requirement for the different gp120 epitopes recognized by CD4 T cells
To determine whether gp120 Ag processing is necessary for the recognition of this Ag by CD4 T cells, we evaluated the CD4 T cell responses to whole undigested gp120 vs enzymatically digested gp120 that were presented by fixed APCs. WT gp120 proteins were left untreated or were pretreated in vitro overnight with lysosomal enzymes isolated from the B lymphoblastoid cell line that have been routinely used as APCs, and then they were incubated with formaldehyde-treated B cells. The fixed B cells do not ingest and process exogenous Ag but retain the capability to present preprocessed peptides in the context of the proper MHC-II. The requirement of gp120 processing for CD4 T cell lines PS01, PS02, and PS05 was evaluated. The results show that PS05 did not recognize undigested gp120 presented by the fixed APCs, but it responded to gp120 that was predigested. Similar data were obtained with the PS02 line that recognized the C2 epitope. Surprisingly, the C1-specific PS01 cell line recognized both the digested and undigested gp120 equally well (Fig. 4A). These results demonstrate that while the C1 epitope recognition can occur without any processing, the proteolytic digestion of gp120 is absolutely required for the generation and presentation of CD4 T cell epitopes derived from the C2 and C4 regions of gp120. The reason for the unusual mode of CD4 T cell recognition of the C1 epitope is not known at this point; however, the crystallographic analyses of different HIV and SIV gp120 structures demonstrate that the C1 region is a part of the inner domain of gp120 that is exposed on the protein surface and is capable of undergoing large conformational shifts and rotations (32, 58). This fragment may be sufficiently surface-exposed and mobile to interact with MHC-II without any processing, although further investigations are necessary to examine this issue.
|
G2
Because MHC-II presentation of the C4 epitope to the CD4 T cell line PS05 requires proteolytic processing, we investigated the effects of the
G2 mutation on the processing and generation of this particular epitope from in vitro digestion of the gp120 Ags by lysosomal enzymes. First, the kinetics of proteolytic digestion of WT and
G2 gp120 proteins by lysosomal enzymes were determined by measuring the amounts of intact undigested gp120 remaining in the reaction over time. Fig. 4B shows that both proteins were digested at comparable rates, and after overnight digestion, very little intact gp120 proteins, either WT or
G2, were detected. These data indicate that overall these two proteins were similarly sensitive to proteolysis by lysosomal enzymes. Nevertheless, there might be differences in proteolytic cleavage at specific gp120 regions that could not be detected in this assay. We subsequently evaluated if the C4 epitope recognized by PS05 could be generated and presented properly following in vitro digestion of
G2 as compared with that of the WT protein. After the gp120 proteins were digested overnight by lysosomal enzymes, the digestion products were incubated with fixed B cells used as APCs, and the PS05 responses to these fixed APCs were measured. Fig. 4C shows that the C4 epitope was efficiently presented to the PS05 cells after in vitro lysosomal digestion of either
G2 or WT proteins. These results rule out the possibility that the
G2 mutation might have destroyed the C4 epitope by either exposing or introducing new proteolytic sites in this region of gp120. The data also suggest that when the
G2 protein is processed by multiple lysosomal enzymes simultaneously, as occurs in the in vitro digestion condition, a sufficient level of the C4 epitope can be generated and presented on MHC-II to stimulate the PS05 cells. In contrast, the C4 epitopes may not be efficiently released following the stepwise Ag processing that is expected to take place inside the APCs.
Effect of the N-linked glycan deletion
G2 on gp120 proteolytic cleavage
The Ag processing mechanisms necessary for generating CD4 T cell epitopes from the C2 and C4 regions of gp120 are not yet known. In fact, none of the proteases involved in gp120 proteolytic processing within APCs has been defined. Hence, to test the idea that the loss of N448-linked glycan due to the
G2 mutation exerts a specific impact on the proteolysis of the C4 regions of gp120, we examined the relative sensitivity of this region as compared with the more distant C2 region to proteolytic cleavage by trypsin. MALDI-TOF MS was used to detect and quantify the different gp120 peptide fragments derived from the trypsin digestion. Gp120 tryptic fragments detectable by MS included peptides from the C1, C2, and C4 regions of gp120. Interestingly, these peptides partially overlap with each of the four CD4 T cell epitopes studied (Table I). These results confirmed previous findings by Brown et al. (59) showing that tryptic fragments of gp120 indeed overlapped with many of the immunodominant CD4 T cell epitopes already identified.
|
G2 mutation had significant effects on proteolytic cleavage of the C4 region of gp120, a C4-derived tryptic peptide fragment (designated peptide C4) that partially overlaps with the PS05 epitope was selected for the initial analyses. We compared the amounts of peptide C4 produced following trypsin digestion of the
G2,
G1, or WT gp120 proteins as a measure of the relative efficiencies by which the C4 region of the different gp120 proteins was proteolytically processed into smaller peptide fragments. Quantitative MS analyses were performed using a known quantity of an AQUA internal standard that had an identical sequence to peptide C4 but contained a 13C- and 15N-labeled arginine. Digestion of the
G2 protein produced a lower amount of peptide C4 (p < 0.05 as compared with WT) (Fig. 5, A and C). In contrast, the amount of peptide C4 released from
G1 digestion was not significantly different (p > 0.05). For comparison, the amounts of the C2 peptide generated from the trypsin digestion of the WT or mutant gp120 proteins were also analyzed and found to be comparable (p > 0.05) (Fig. 5E). However, when the gp120 proteins were irreversibly denatured and then digested, similar amounts of peptide C4 were produced from each of the three proteins (Fig. 5, B and D). These results suggest that the
G2 mutation at position 448 induces conformation changes in the C4 region of gp120 that render this particular region more resistant to proteolytic cleavage, impeding the generation of the peptide fragments from this region. The same mutation did not affect proteolytic cleavage of the more distant C2 region, and thus had no effect on the presentation of the C2 epitope. Notably, the reduction of the C4 peptide yield from the nondenatured
G2 is only
67%, but this experiment was performed with trypsin and under an in vitro condition that does not replicate the processing environment inside APCs. The processing of the C4 region from
G2 inside APCs may be much more reduced, since the C4-specific CD4 T cells PS05 did not respond well to
G2, even when the amounts were increased from 0.3 to 5 µg/ml.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Of note, the N448 glycan removal affected specifically the nearby C4 epitopes, and its effect was most dramatic on the C4 epitope closest to N448 (i.e., the PS05 epitope) (Fig. 1). The effect on a C4 epitope located slightly upstream (T1 epitope) was less profound, while the distant C1 or C2 sites were not at all affected, indicating the highly localized impact of this particular glycan. In contrast, the removal of two other glycans (linked to N406 and N463) flanking the C4 epitopes did not cause any significant alterations in CD4 T cell recognition of these epitopes. The reason for this difference is that even though the N406- and N463-linked glycans appear in the linear gp120 sequence to flank the C4 epitopes, they are not in the immediate vicinity of the C4 region in the three-dimensional structure of gp120 (Fig. 6A). Of the three glycans studied here, only the N448-linked glycan is located directly over the C4 region, while N406- and N463-linked glycans protrude from different faces of the gp120 surface. These glycans are shown in Fig. 6A in the context of the CD4-bound gp120 structure that has been determined at a relatively high resolution (65), and they are similarly positioned on the unliganded gp120 protein (58).
|
6% of these viruses lack this particular glycosylation site. One intriguing question that remains to be addressed is whether the induction of the CD4 T cell response targeting the C4 epitopes leads to selection of viruses that lack the N448-linked glycan. In most HIV-1-seropositive subjects, either chronically or acutely infected, CD4 T cell responses to C4, and other gp120 epitopes are usually weak or undetectable (46, 66, 67, 68, 69) and thus are not likely to exert sufficient selective pressure for the emergence of escape mutants. Nevertheless, robust CD4 T cells specific for the C4 epitopes were stimulated in an HIV-seronegative recipient of the recombinant gp120 vaccine (70), and upon exposure with the virus challenge, these cells may contribute to the generation of escape mutants. The data presented here show that one effective strategy that the virus can exploit to escape immune surveillance by CD4 T cells is by disposing of a glycan, such as the N448-linked glycan, which does not substantially affect virus–receptor interactions and may even enhance virus infectivity. Nevertheless, the viruses lacking this glycan may also become more susceptible to Ab-mediated neutralization and/or CD8 T cell recognition (35, 57).
Why does the removal of N448-linked glycan lead to the loss of CD4 T cell recognition of the nearby C4 region? Previous studies have shown that some T cells are specific for glycosylated peptides and fail to recognize the deglycosylated version of the same peptides. The capacity of each of the gp120-specific CD4 T cell lines studied here, including the C4-specific PS05 and T1 lines, to respond to nonglycosylated synthetic peptides, which were utilized in the first place to map the epitopes, argues against this possibility. We also consider the possibility that the removal of N448-linked glycan may introduce or expose proteolytic sites that destroy the C4 epitopes during proteolysis. However, in vitro digestion of the
G2 protein lacking the N448-glycan by APC-derived endolysosomal enzymes efficiently generated the C4 epitope for MHC-II presentation to the CD4 T cell line PS05 (Fig. 4C). These results indicate that the PS05 epitope is not destroyed following digestion of the
G2 mutant by endolysosomal proteases, although the enzymatic processes that take place during gp120 Ag processing inside the APCs are not completely understood and may be distinct from the endolysosomal enzyme digestion performed in vitro. Considering that N-linked glycosylation is known to play an important role in determining protein folding and conformation, we propose an alternative hypothesis that the loss of the N448-linked glycan G2 induces a structural change in the proximal C4 region, which hinders the proteolytic cleavage of this particular region. This idea is supported by the data from trypsin digestion and MALDI-TOF MS analysis showing that trypsin digestion of the
G2 mutant generated a lower amount of peptide from the C4 region as compared with digestion of the WT or
G1 mutant, although this C4 region was equally sensitive to trypsin cleavage when the
G2 mutant was denatured before digestion (Fig. 5). A larger peptide fragment (m/z of 2580) containing peptide C4 that was not cleaved at its C terminus was also detected in the
G2 digestion, but not in the digestion of the WT or
G1 mutant (data not shown). In contrast, the
G2 mutation has no effect on proteolytic cleavage of the unrelated C2 region. These results are consistent with the differential effects of the
G2 mutation on CD4 T cell recognition of the C4 epitopes vs the other gp120 epitopes.
The nature of structural changes induced by the loss of N448-linked glycan G2 has yet to be defined. The ELISA data demonstrate that the
G2 mutant had a small, but consistent, decreased CD4-binding activity as compared with the WT or other mutants (Fig. 2C). However, the envelope bearing this mutation remained functional and could efficiently mediate virus entry. This mutant also showed slight alterations in reactivity with mAbs specific for the C1 or C1/C5 regions (EH21 and C11) and the V3 region of gp120 (447), although its reactivities with mAbs to other gp120 regions were not altered. Hence, the loss of the G2 glycan does not cause global conformational changes on the gp120 protein, but it may simply induce localized structural changes in the C4 region. The loss of N-linked glycans has typically been associated with reduced rigidity of the nearby amino acids, thereby lowering entropy for protein–protein interactions and increasing sensitivity to enzyme activities (29). However, in the case of the
G2 mutant, the removal of a glycan actually brings about the opposite results. Glycosylation is also known to influence protein folding, and the loss of the G2 glycan may induce alterations in the β-strand-turn-β-strand structure found in the C4 region. Currently, there is no evidence for such alterations, and further studies are needed to explore this possibility. Another possibility is that the removal of the G2 glycan alters the structural arrangement of the neighboring glycans. Previous studies demonstrate that the reactivity of anti-gp120 mAb 2G12, which recognizes a cluster of oligomannose sugars on the gp120 surface, was affected by the removal of glycans that are not directly bound by mAb but are in close proximity to the epitope (71, 72, 73, 74, 75), indicating the contribution of glycan–glycan interactions in maintaining the conformation of glycans on the gp120 surface. On the three-dimensional structure of gp120, the N448-linked G2 glycan is flanked on each side by N295-linked and N262-linked glycans. These three glycans protrude to form a cluster of sugar towers that rise over the C4 region recognized by the CD4 T cells (Fig. 6B). The loss of the G2 glycan in the middle of this cluster may cause the two flanking glycans to collapse or bend over the C4 region, blocking access of proteolytic enzymes to this particular region. Studies are in progress to test this hypothesis by preparing additional gp120 mutants lacking the N262- and N295-linked glycans, as well as the N448-glycan.
In summary, this study demonstrates that N-linked glycosylation is an important determinant for modulating the processing and MHC-II presentation of HIV envelope Ag gp120, and consequently CD4 T cell responses to this Ag. While the presence of glycans on gp120 may shield some epitopes, this also allows the presentation and recognition of other epitopes, thus shaping the repertoire of the immune responses against this viral Ag. A better understanding about the roles of glycans positioned in the different surfaces of gp120 will help us design immunogens to target the immune responses toward the crucial epitopes on this viral envelope.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Disclosures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 This work was supported by funds from a Merit Review Award and the Research Enhancement Award Program of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, New York University Center for AIDS Research Immunology Core (AI-27742), the Training Program in TB and HIV Prevention and Treatment (D43 TWO1409), and by National Institutes of Health Grant AI48371. The mass spectrometry analysis was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants NS050276 and RR14662 to Dr. Thomas A. Neubert (Skirball Institute, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY). ![]()
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Catarina E. Hioe, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 423 East 23rd Street, Room 18-124 North, New York, NY 10010. E-mail address: catarina.hioe{at}med.nyu.edu ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: MHC-II, MHC class II; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; MS, mass spectrometry; tPA, tissue plasminogen activator; WT, wild type. ![]()
Received for publication August 31, 2007. Accepted for publication January 7, 2008.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-herpesvirus in B cell-deficient mice is mediated by IFN-
. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 5135-5140.
1
2 mannose residues on the outer face of gp120. J. Virol. 76: 7306-7321. This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Li, C.-F. Xu, S. Blais, Q. Wan, H.-T. Zhang, S. J. Landry, and C. E. Hioe Proximal Glycans Outside of the Epitopes Regulate the Presentation of HIV-1 Envelope gp120 Helper Epitopes J. Immunol., May 15, 2009; 182(10): 6369 - 6378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |