|
|
||||||||
Laboratory of Cellular Physiology and Immunology and Chris Browne Center for Immunology and Immune Diseases, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Langerin/CD207 is a type II transmembrane protein (5). Originally, Langerin was thought to be LC-specific, but it is expressed on other DCs, especially CD8+ DEC+ DCs in spleen (7) and skin draining lymph nodes (pLN), although at lower levels (6, 8, 9). The expression of Langerin by CD8+DEC+ DCs is primarily seen in BALB/c mice but is much reduced in C57BL/6 mice (8). Langerin recognizes mannose, n-acetylglucosamine, fucose, and sulfated sugars (7, 10, 11). Langerin also binds pathogens such as HIV (12) and Candida albicans (13). Langerin is responsible for Birbeck granule formation within LCs (5). Both Birbeck granules and Langerin are involved in endocytosis (5, 14). In human epidermal LCs, Langerin is predominantly found in an endosomal recycling compartment (14). In murine epidermis, Langerin was found to colocalize with MHC II in situ (15). Abs to Langerin can be internalized (5), but it is not known whether this mediates Ag presentation to T cells.
A new way to assess receptor function, including in vivo, is to deliver Ags within anti-receptor mAbs, which selectively bind to the receptor and initiate Ag uptake, processing, and presentation on MHC products. Depending on the maturation state of the targeted DCs, receptor-mediated targeting enhances or inhibits T cell responses (3, 16, 17, 18). The role of DC subsets expressing select receptors, as well as the role of the receptors themselves in Ag presentation, might therefore be determined by using specific mAbs as Ag carriers.
In this study, we use a newly developed mAb to the extracellular domain of mouse Langerin to begin to study the consequences of Ag uptake via Langerin in vivo (8). We have cloned the H and L chains of this mAb and engineered the H chain to encode OVA. We will show that OVA targeting to Langerin results in efficient presentation to OVA-specific CD4+ and CD8+ transgenic T cells.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
C57BL/6J and BALB/cJ mice were purchased from Charles River or Jackson Laboratories and used at 6–8 wk of age. OVA-specific, TCR transgenic, OT-I (C57BL/6-Tg(TcraTcrb)1100Mjb/J) and OT-II (C57BL/6-Tg(TcraTcrb)425Cbn/J) mice were used as described (17). All animals were maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions and used under institutional guidelines.
Reagents
Anti-CD16/32, FITC-anti-CD11c, allophycocyanin-anti-CD8, anti-CD4, and PE-V
2 were from BD Biosciences or eBioscience. Other reagents were RPMI 1640 and DMEM (Invitrogen Life Technologies/GIBCO), ACK (ammonium chloride potassium) lysing buffer (BioSource International), 30% BSA Solution (Sigma-Aldrich), Alexa Fluor 647 labeling kit (Invitrogen Life Technologies/Molecular Probes), and EZ-Link Biotin (Pierce).
Cloning, engineering and production of anti-Langerin Ab
Cloning of V regions from rat mAbs and engineering of hybrid mAbs with mouse IgG1 H and
light constant regions was described for mAbs III/10 (control Ig), NLDC145 (anti-DEC205) (16), and 33D1 (anti-DCIR2) (3). Similarly, the V regions of anti-mouse Langerin mAb (8) were cloned from RNAs of the L31 hybridoma with the 5' RACE system (Invitrogen Life Technologies) using rat IgG2a-specific oligonucleotides (5'-CATCCCAGGGTCACCATGGA-3' and 5'-CTGTTGTTTCAGCTGAGGAGACTG-3') and rat
-specific oligonucleotides (5'-CAACCTCACAGGTATAGAG-3' and 5'-GAAGATGGATACAGTTGGTGCAGCATC-3') following the manufacturers instructions. An OLLAS epitope sequence was inserted as a linker between the H chain and OVA for the detection of hybrid mAbs by an anti-OLLAS tag mAb (19). Hybrid mAbs were produced (3) and receptor binding was verified using Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) transfected cells by FACS.
Adoptive transfer and T cell proliferation responses
OVA-specific transgenic CD8+ or CD4+ T cells were prepared from lymph node and spleen cell suspensions of OT-I or OT-II mice (17). T cell proliferation was evaluated by injecting individual mice with either 2–3 x 106 OT-I or 3–5 x 106 OT-II cells, labeled at 107 cells/ml with 5 µM CFSE (Invitrogen/Molecular Probes) for 10 min at 37°C. Targeting mAbs were injected s.c. 24 h later. CFSE dilution was evaluated 3 days later by FACS after surface staining for CD4 (OT-II) or CD8 (OT-I) and V
2 (OVA-specific TCR). To address Ag persistence, mAbs were injected 14, 3, or 1 day before T cell transfer.
Evaluation of Ag targeting in vivo
To evaluate mAb targeting to DCs by FACS, animals were injected s.c. with 10 µg of L31-OLLAS-OVA. Spleen and pLN (popliteal, cervical, inguinal, axillary, and brachial) were harvested 24 h later. DCs were enriched by low density on dense BSA (8), and the cells were stained with anti-CD11c-FITC and anti-OLLAS-Alexa Fluor 647. For immunofluorescence, mice were injected s.c. with 25 µg of L31-OLLAS-OVA or control Ig. Twelve hours later, tissue sections were analyzed with a Zeiss LSM 510 system (8).
Statistical analysis
The Student t test was applied to reveal significant differences in fold clonal expansion of transgenic T cells, defined as the ratio of the number of cells with more than one division to the number of transgenic T cells in control mice that had not received Ag. Our results are expressed as the mean ± SE. In the figures, p values of
0.05 are labeled with a single asterisk (*) in contrast to p values of
0.01 (**) or
0.001 (***).
| Results and Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To examine the capacity of the Langerin receptor to process and present proteins through the MHC I and II pathways, we genetically engineered mAbs against Langerin (8), DEC (16), DCIR2 (3), and a nonreactive control Ig (ISO) to express OVA. To track Ab expression and binding, we added a linker tag sequence between the C terminus of the Ab H chain and OVA named OLLAS, recognized by an anti-OLLAS mAb (19) (Fig. 1A). In each case, the fusion H chain had a molecular mass of
110 kDa (Fig. 1B) and reacted with anti-mouse Ig, anti-OVA, and anti-OLLAS mAbs by Western blotting (Fig. 1C). By FACS, each fusion mAb bound appropriately to CHO transfectants expressing receptor (Fig. 1D, gray histograms), but not to untransfected CHO (CHO/Neo; Fig. 1D, black histograms), while the control Ig-OVA did not bind to Langerin, DEC, or DCIR2 (Fig. 1D). Thus, each mAb to three endocytic receptors can be engineered to express both OVA as an Ag and OLLAS as a sensitive tag.
|
To assess targeting of anti-Langerin to DCs in vivo, we injected BALB/c mice s.c. in the footpads with anti-Langerin-OLLAS-OVA or control mAb and detected OLLAS by FACS analysis and immunofluorescence. The isotype control mAb (ISO-OLLAS-OVA, where ISO is isotype control) did not bind to DCs (Fig. 2A, top), whereas anti-Langerin-OLLAS-OVA targeted all subsets of Langerin+ cells, e.g., both CD11chigh (
25 ± 5% of Langerin+ cells) and CD11clow (
70 ± 5% of Langerin+ cells) DCs in spleen and in pLN (Fig. 2A). By FACS, the DC labeling by anti-OLLAS tag mAb was selective for those CD11c+ cells that also were labeled with anti-Langerin (data not shown). By immunofluorescence of tissue sections, anti-OLLAS also selectively stained cells reactive with anti-Langerin in the T cell area of pLN (Fig. 2B). These results indicate that s.c. injection of hybrid anti-Langerin Abs targets Langerin+ DCs selectively and systemically (spleen) in vivo.
|
C57BL/6 mice were injected with graded doses of each OLLAS-OVA fusion mAb 1 day after inoculating CFSE-labeled OT-I or OT-II T cells, the latter to monitor Ag presentation in vivo. After 3 days, pLN and spleen were evaluated for T cell proliferation by CFSE dilution and the total number of expanded CFSE-low cells. Anti-DEC, anti-Langerin, and anti-DCIR2- OLLAS-OVA induced responses by MHC I-restricted CD8+ OT-I cells, as well as MHC II-restricted OT-II cells, in both spleen and pLN. Virtually all T cells entered cell cycle and underwent 4–8 cell divisions after a single dose of 3 µg of anti-Langerin-OLLAS-OVA (Fig. 3A). Similar results were obtained when we inoculated fusion mAbs lacking the OLLAS tag, indicating that the OLLAS sequence did not affect Ag presentation in vivo (data not shown). We also reproduced prior work (3) showing that 33D1 anti-DCIR2, which selectively targets CD8– DCs, was more efficient in inducing CD4+ T cell expansion while anti-DEC was more efficient for CD8+ T cells (Fig. 3B). Anti-Langerin-OVA was intermediate in its behavior, slightly less effective than anti-DEC for triggering OT-I expansion but more effective for OT-II T cells (Fig. 3B). The observations with OT-II cells in C57BL/6 mice were confirmed on DO11.10 T cells in BALB/c mice (data not shown). Taken together, Langerin delivers OVA Ag for efficient presentation on MHC I and II products.
|
To evaluate the persistence of presented Ag, we injected the different OVA fusion mAbs and 1, 3, or 14 days later we injected CFSE-labeled, OVA-specific OT-I or OT-II cells. Presentation to CD8+ T cells after one dose of anti-Langerin-OLLAS-OVA was long-lasting (Fig. 4), being vigorous in pLN and spleen 14 days after mAb injection. In contrast, as shown previously (3) presentation by CD8– DCs via anti-DCIR2 persisted for 3 days (Fig. 4). Functional peptide MHC complexes persisted to a slightly greater extent at day 14 when OVA was targeted via Langerin rather than DEC (Fig. 4).
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Disclosures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 This work was supported by the Center for AIDS Vaccine Discovery, National Institutes of Health Grants AI 13013, AI 40874, and AI 057158 (to R.M.S.) and AI 057158 (to C.G.P.), and the Canadian Histiocytosis Association. ![]()
2 J.I. and C.C. contributed equally to this work. ![]()
3 C.G.P. and R.M.S. are equally contributing senior authors. ![]()
4 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Chae Gyu Park or Dr. Ralph M. Steinman, Laboratory of Cellular Physiology and Immunology and Chris Browne Center for Immunology and Immune Diseases, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065. E-mail addresses: steinma{at}mail.rockefeller.edu and parkc{at}mail.rockefeller.edu ![]()
5 Abbreviations used in this paper: DC, dendritic cell; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; LC, Langerhans cell; pLN, skin draining lymph node. ![]()
Received for publication November 29, 2007. Accepted for publication January 25, 2008.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Nagao, F. Ginhoux, W. W. Leitner, S.-I. Motegi, C. L. Bennett, B. E. Clausen, M. Merad, and M. C. Udey Murine epidermal Langerhans cells and langerin-expressing dermal dendritic cells are unrelated and exhibit distinct functions PNAS, March 3, 2009; 106(9): 3312 - 3317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Idoyaga, N. Suda, K. Suda, C. G. Park, and R. M. Steinman Antibody to Langerin/CD207 localizes large numbers of CD8{alpha}+ dendritic cells to the marginal zone of mouse spleen PNAS, February 3, 2009; 106(5): 1524 - 1529. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Dickgreber, P. Stoitzner, Y. Bai, K. M. Price, K. J. Farrand, K. Manning, C. E. Angel, P. R. Dunbar, F. Ronchese, J. D. Fraser, et al. Targeting Antigen to MHC Class II Molecules Promotes Efficient Cross-Presentation and Enhances Immunotherapy J. Immunol., February 1, 2009; 182(3): 1260 - 1269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Caminschi, A. I. Proietto, F. Ahmet, S. Kitsoulis, J. Shin Teh, J. C. Y. Lo, A. Rizzitelli, L. Wu, D. Vremec, S. L. H. van Dommelen, et al. The dendritic cell subtype-restricted C-type lectin Clec9A is a target for vaccine enhancement Blood, October 15, 2008; 112(8): 3264 - 3273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |