The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


The Journal of Immunology, 2008, 180, 3019 -3027
Copyright © 2008 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jakubzick, C.
Right arrow Articles by Randolph, G. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jakubzick, C.
Right arrow Articles by Randolph, G. J.

Blood Monocyte Subsets Differentially Give Rise to CD103+ and CD103 Pulmonary Dendritic Cell Populations1

Claudia Jakubzick*, Frank Tacke2,*, Florent Ginhoux*, Amy J. Wagers{dagger}, Nico van Rooijen, Matthias Mack{ddagger}, Miriam Merad* and Gwendalyn J. Randolph3,*

* Department of Gene and Cell Medicine, Icahn Research Institute, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029; {dagger} Stowers Medical Institute, Harvard Stem Cell Institute and Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; and {ddagger} Department of Internal Medicine, Clinic of the University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
There are two major myeloid pulmonary dendritic cell (DC) populations: CD103+ DCs and CD11bhigh DCs. In this study, we investigated in detail the origins of both myeloid DC pools using multiple experimental approaches. We show that, in resting lung, Ly-6ChighCCR2high monocytes repopulated CD103+ DCs using a CCR2-dependent mechanism, and these DCs preferentially retained residual CCR2 in the lung, whereas, conversely, Ly-6ClowCCR2low monocytes repopulated CD11bhigh DCs. CX3CR1 was required to generate normal numbers of pulmonary CD11bhigh DCs, possibly because Ly-6Clow monocytes in the circulation, which normally express high levels of CX3CR1, failed to express bcl-2 and may have diminished survival in the circulation in the absence of CX3CR1. Overall, these data demonstrate that the two circulating subsets of monocytes give rise to distinct tissue DC populations.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
There are two major myeloid CD11c+MHCII+ dendritic cell (DC)4 populations in the airway and lung interstitium: CD11bhigh CD103 and CD11blowCD103+ DCs (1). CD103 is the {alpha}E integrin subunit that pairs with β7 to generate a functional integrin that binds to E-cadherin (2). In the intestine, CD103+ DCs stand out among other intestinal DCs as the critical DC subset for inducing T regulatory cells (3, 4) and instructing expression of the gut-homing molecules CCR9 and {alpha}4β7 on T cells (3). It remains unknown whether CD103+ DCs in the lung function similarly as in the intestine. Recent data indicate that CD103+ lung DCs preferentially present Ag to CD8+ T lymphocytes (5). CD11bhigh lung DCs produce a broad spectrum of chemokines (6) and may be oriented toward perpetuation of airway effector responses and inflammation (7), whereas CD103+ lung DCs produce mainly CCL17 and CCL22 that attract Th2 and regulatory T cells (6).

Both CD103+ and CD11bhigh DCs in the airway and lung parenchyma emigrate to the mediastinal (bronchial) lymph nodes, even in the steady state without overt inflammation (8). This ongoing migration out of the pulmonary space is substantial, such that the turnover time of airway DCs is brief, on the order of a few days (9, 10, 11, 12). However, the precursors that serve to replenish pulmonary DCs are fully not delineated. Recent data indicate that monocytes are precursors for pulmonary DCs (13, 14), but the various subpopulations of DCs in the lung were not specifically traced; therefore, many important questions regarding the role of monocytes as precursors for pulmonary DCs remain to be answered.

There are two main monocyte subsets in mice: CCR2highLy-6Chigh (also called Gr-1high) monocytes, which are the more classical monocytes that readily emigrate to sites of ongoing inflammation (15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23); and CCR2lowLy-6Clow (also called Gr-1low) monocytes (24, 25), which express the highest level of CX3CR1 among circulating adult leukocytes (15). The human counterparts of these subsets are CD14+CD16 and CD14lowCD16+ monocytes, respectively (15, 26). Mouse monocytes that develop in the bone marrow are mainly of the Ly-6Chigh population (27, 28). Ly-6Clow monocytes descend from Ly-6Chigh monocytes (13, 16, 28) through a conversion event that is not yet well characterized, and the biology of these monocytes is generally poorly understood. Ly-6Clow monocytes do not robustly emigrate to many tissues, but they do migrate well to lung even in the absence of inflammation (15). Thus, studies of their fate after emigration into lung may be especially useful in revealing insight into their differentiation and functional properties.

In this study, we conducted experiments to evaluate the role of each monocyte subset in giving rise to CD103+ or CD11bhigh pulmonary DCs. Our data reveal that CD103+ and CD11bhigh DCs in the lung arise from monocytes. However, the two subsets of monocytes become different types of DCs. Ly-6Clow monocytes develop into CD11bhigh DCs, whereas Ly-6Chigh monocytes become CD103+ DCs. Our data thus provide the first evidence that the two subsets of monocytes recruited to the same tissue undergo differential differentiation pathways within the DC lineage. Our data also provide insight into how the frequencies of CD103+ DCs vs CD11bhigh DCs in the lung, two populations with distinct functions in immunity, are regulated and may be manipulated.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
Parabiosis

C57BL/6 mice (CD45.2+ or CD45.1+) were purchased from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories or the National Cancer Institute. These mice, or in other experiments not shown C57BL/Ka and C57BL/Ka-actin/eGFP mouse strains (bred and maintained at the Harvard School of Public Health (29)), were used in parabiotic studies wherein two mice are surgically joined. Parabiotic mice were sacrificed by 8 wk after surgery. The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees at Mount Sinai School of Medicine or Harvard University approved all procedures.

LPS-treated mice

Fully anesthetized WT C57BL/6 mice were intranasally treated with 5 µg of LPS from Escherichia coli strain 026:B6 (catalog no. L-2880; Sigma-Aldrich), 5 µg of LPS from E. coli strain 055:B5 (catalog no. L-8274; Sigma-Aldrich), or no LPS. Intranasal deliveries were in 30-µl volumes of PBS. E. coli strain 055:B5 LPS induced a more robust neutrophil recruitment to the lungs compared with E. coli strain 026:B6 LPS. Blood and lungs were analyzed 1 day after intranasal delivery.

Transplantation of congenic bone marrow chimera

Seven- to 8-wk-old CD45.1+ congenic C57BL/6 mice were lethally irradiated with two doses of 650 rad 18 h apart. After the second irradiation, C57BL/6 CD45.1+ recipient mice received an i.v. injection of 1 x 106 cells of donor bone marrow cells. These bone marrow mixtures were WT CD45.1:WT CD45.2, WT CD45.1:CCR2 knockout (KO) CD45.2 (30), or WT CD45.1: CX3CR1gfp/gfp CD45.2 mice (31). CX3CR1gfp/gfp mice have replaced the fractalkine receptor gene with a GFP reporter, such that mice with two copies of GFP are devoid of an intact fractalkine receptor gene. For a control group, 100% WT CD45.2 bone marrow cells were transferred into lethally irradiated WT CD45.1 mice to confirm lethal irradiation of these recipient mice. Mice were sacrificed 8 wk after bone marrow transfer. All strains of mice were at least 10 generations backcrossed onto the C57BL/6 background.

Labeling monocytes with latex particles

Circulating monocytes were labeled with particulates as previously described (22, 28). In brief, Ly-6Clow monocytes were labeled by i.v. injection of 200 µl of 0.5-µm or 1.0-mm FITC-like plain latex microspheres (Polysciences) diluted to 0.1% (w/v) in PBS without calcium or magnesium. Labeling of Ly-6Chigh monocytes was achieved by first injecting 200 ml of clodronate-loaded liposomes (32) i.v. 18 h before a subsequent injection of latex beads (28). Mice were sacrificed at day 1, 2, 4, or 6 after monocyte labeling. In some cases, data were normalized to account for the fact that only a portion of a given monocyte subset carried latex. Normalization calculations were done as previously described (22). That is, we calculated the frequency of total labeled monocytes of each subset in the circulation. To do this for each animal at each time point available, we multiplied the percentage of blood PBMCs that were Ly-6Chigh or Ly-6Clow monocytes (depending on the subset being traced) by the percentage of latex+ monocytes. This value represents the percentage of latex+ PBMCs and is a reliable normalization factor because total PBMC counts did not vary significantly in response to any of the experimental manipulations. We then took a mean value of the relevant time points available. We divided the percent labeled pulmonary DCs by this fraction to derive a normalized value for how many DCs would be labeled if all monocytes of a given subset carried latex. Some mice received an i.v. injection of latex beads at the same time that 4 µg of pertussis toxin (P7208; Sigma-Aldrich) was injected, and then BAL cells carrying latex were quantified 1 day later.

Flow cytometry and monocyte counts

Blood was collected via tail vein bleeds in heparinized capillary tubes and 20 µl was placed into 400 µl of Turk’s blood diluting fluid for white blood cell counting (catalog no. 8850-16; Ricca Chemical). Total leukocyte counts were then measured using a hemocytometer. The total number of monocyte subsets per milliliter in the blood was calculated by using the percentage of a given monocyte subset, assessed by flow cytometry using the Abs described below, times the total number of leukocytes per milliliter.

Single-cell suspensions were obtained from BAL and whole lung parenchyma. Mice were sacrificed using CO2. BAL was obtained by flushing the airways four times with 1 ml of 0.5 mM EDTA/HBSS. After BAL collection, the blood was collected via the heart with a 1-ml syringe containing 10 µl of 100 mM EDTA. The blood was resuspended in 7.5 ml of ammonium chloride lysing reagent (BD Biosciences) for 5 min, followed by the addition of 7.5 ml of HBSS containing 0.2% BSA and 2 mM EDTA for 5 min. Then the blood was washed twice in DMEM. Immediately after blood extraction, the lungs were perfused through the heart with a 30-ml syringe containing 0.3 mM EDTA/PBS, which left the lungs free of visible blood. The lungs were then excised, minced, and digested with collagenase D (Roche) for 30 min. Single-cell suspensions were generated by pressing digested whole lung through a 70-µm cell strainer. Lastly, all cells were resuspended in FACS blocking solution and stained for 30 min with conjugated Abs from eBioscience or BD Biosciences. The following purified mAbs were used for staining: PE-conjugated mAbs to I-Ab, CD11b, CD115, or CD45.2; PerCP-conjugated mAbs to Gr-1 (recognizes Ly-6C and Ly-6G) or CD11b; and allophycocyanin-conjugated mAbs to CD11c, Gr-1 (recognizes Ly-6C and Ly-6G), or CD45.1. CCR2 mAb was previously described (33). Appropriate isotype-matched control mAbs were also obtained from BD Biosciences.

Polymerase chain reaction

Monocyte subsets were subjected to high-speed flow cytometric sorting to separate CD115+F4/80+ blood monocytes that were Ly-6Chigh or Ly-6Clow. RNA was isolated with TRIzol reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen Life Technologies). The purified RNA was subsequently reverse transcribed into cDNA using oligo(dT)12–18 primers (Invitrogen Life Technologies). Primers (5' to 3' sequences) for quantitative real-time PCR analysis were GAPDH sense, GTGGGGCGCCCCAGGCACCA and GAPDH antisense, GTCCTTAATGTCACGCACGATTTC. Bcl-2 primers were purchased from R&D Systems and used according to their recommendations.

Statistics

Statistical analysis was conducted using InStat and Prism software (GraphPad). All results are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Statistical tests were performed using the one-tailed Student t test. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
Pulmonary DC subsets and markers of differentiation

In contrast to other organs, CD11c expression in the lung does not distinguish DCs and macrophages. Pulmonary DC and macrophage populations are both CD11c+ but can be distinguished by differing levels of surface MHC class II (MHC II) and autofluorescence. DCs have low autofluorescence, whereas macrophages are highly autofluorescent (34, 35) in both the bronchoalveolar space and lung interstitium (Fig. 1A). Low autofluorescent, MHC II+ DCs can be further distinguished by their expression of CD11b: one pulmonary DC subset is CD11c+CD11bhighCD103 DCs and the other is CD11c+CD11blowCD103+ DCs (1, 34, 35) (Fig. 1A).


Figure 1
View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 1. Pulmonary DCs in WT and CX3CR1gfp/+ mice. A, Flow cytometry of whole lung cell suspension gated on CD11c+ cells, or BAL gated on live cells, stained for CD11c vs empty FITC fluorescent channel (left). High autofluorescent CD11c+ cells are macrophages (Mac), whereas low autofluorescent CD11c+ cells are DCs. The center flow cytometry plots show the gated DC population stained for CD11c vs CD11b or CD103 vs CD11b. On the right, the histogram plots show that both DC subsets in the lung and in the BAL express high levels of MHCII, CD11blow DC (black line), and CD11bhigh DC (gray line). B, To include all DCs in the low autofluorescence gate in CX3CR1gfp/gfp mice, WT and CX3CR1gfp/gfp DCs were identified as low autofluorescent cells using an empty FL-2 channel (PE channel), rather than FL-1, to avoid missing GFP+ cells (arrow) that include the GFP+ DCs. C, The CCR2 mAb was used to stain blood monocytes or BAL DC subsets from WT (red) and CCR2 KO mice (blue).

 
Pulmonary DCs have been reported to be GFP+ in CX3CR1gfp/+ mice (13, 14). However, we observed that whereas the majority of the CD11bhigh DCs expressed GFP in CX3CR1gfp/+ and CX3CR1gfp/gfp mice, none of the CD103+ DCs were GFP+ (Fig. 1B). Thus, tracing GFP from CX3CR1gfp mice to inclusively identify myeloid DCs in tissues is limited. When examining GFP-negative mouse strains, low autofluorescent CD11c+ cells were gated in an open (no staining) FL-1 channel typically used to observe fluorescence associated with FITC (Fig. 1A). In CX3CR1gfp mice, low autofluorescent DCs were identified using an open FL-2 channel (typically used to identify R-PE-conjugated Abs) to avoid interference with GFP+ cells (Fig. 1B, arrow) that included DCs. Finally, staining with CCR2 mAb in WT and CCR2 KO mice showed the expected reduction in CCR2 staining on Ly-6Clow monocytes compared with Ly-6Chigh monocytes. BAL DC subsets also differentially expressed CCR2, with CD103+ DCs expressing higher levels than CD11bhigh DCs (Fig. 1C).

Tracing the fate of labeled monocyte subsets in the lung and BAL

To study the fate of monocyte subsets in the lung, we first used methods to label monocytes endogenously with 0.5-µm latex beads introduced i.v. Depending on the conditions of labeling, Ly-6Chigh or Ly-6Clow monocytes are selectively labeled, and each population remains in the circulation for several days as they gradually decline in number within the blood (22, 28, 36). Within ~1 wk after Ly-6Chigh monocytes are labeled, the fraction remaining in blood converts to Ly-6Clow monocytes (28). These methods do not affect the migration patterns of labeled monocytes and do not induce inflammatory cytokines that can be detected in serum (22). Indeed, results obtained with these methods are in complete agreement with adoptive transfer approaches in different models (22, 23, 36, 37) and have the capacity to sensitively trace endogenous monocytes.

Two cohorts of mice were independently treated to label Ly-6Clow or Ly-6Chigh monocyte subsets, and the migration and differentiation of each subset in lung and BAL were traced. To analyze the contribution of monocytes giving rise to DCs in the lung and BAL, total DCs were first gated (Fig. 2A, left plots) and then latex+ DCs were examined (Fig. 2A). Approximately 80% of the recovered latex+ DCs that originated from Ly-6Clow monocytes were CD11bhigh DCs, whereas the labeled Ly-6Chigh monocytes gave rise to both DC subsets at relatively equal frequency during all time points (Fig. 2, A and B). This outcome matches the staining pattern for CCR2, since the monocyte subset with the highest CCR2 expression was the only population of monocytes that was linked to the CD103+ DCs, which likewise express higher CCR2 than their CD11bhigh counterparts (Fig. 1C).


Figure 2
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 2. Tracing monocyte fate after labeling of endogenous monocyte subsets. A, Dot plot shows latex+ DCs within the total DC gate. Histograms show distribution of CD11bhigh and CD11blow DCs among total lung DCs (left histograms) and gated latex+ DCs derived from labeled Ly-6Clow (upper row) or Ly-6Chigh (bottom row) monocyte subsets. B, Bar graph indicates the percentage of latex+ lung and BAL DCs that were CD11bhigh and CD11blow DC subpopulations after latex labeling of Ly-6Clow or Ly-6Chigh blood monocytes at days 1 through 6. These data compile results from four experiments with n = 4–6 per group in each. C, Mice were treated with PBS or pertussis toxin after latex labeling i.v. Then the number of DCs in BAL was quantified 2 days later. D, Stack bar graphs show percentage of CD11bhigh DC (gray portion of the bar) and percentage of CD11blow DC (black portion of the bar) among DCs in the lung and BAL. Data were normalized to account for the partial fraction of monocytes carrying latex; normalized data reveal the percentage of labeled DCs in lung interstitium or BAL if all monocytes within a given blood subset had carried latex beads. These data compile results from four experiments with n = 4–6 per group in each.

 
Acquisition of latex by pulmonary DCs was inhibited by pertussis toxin treatment of the mice (Fig. 2C), consistent with a role for latex+ migratory cells as their precursors rather than passive transfer of the latex to DCs. Within the total DCs, CD11bhigh DCs were often reduced in frequency following the clodronate-liposome treatment used in the Ly-6Chigh monocyte-labeling protocol (Fig. 2A, see histograms of total DCs), although treatment with the clodronate-loaded liposomes had no statistically significant impact on the total numbers of pulmonary DCs (data not shown). This finding fits well with our knowledge that Ly-6Chigh monocytes return to the blood much sooner than Ly-6Clow monocytes after clodronate treatment (16, 28) and is independently consistent with pulmonary CD11bhigh DCs arising from Ly-6Clow blood monocytes, as suggested from the latex tracing method.

To estimate the extent to which blood monocyte subsets replaced lung or BAL DCs, we normalized to account for the fraction of each subset of monocyte that was labeled. The normalized data estimate the upper limit in the fraction of total DCs that would be labeled if all monocytes of a given subset had carried latex. Because the latex-labeling method may have some so far unrecognized impact on monocyte trafficking, we emphasize that these data are merely an estimate. Nonetheless, the data suggest that, collectively, the two monocyte subsets could account for the generation of the majority of interstitial DCs by day 4 after labeling (Fig. 2D). A major difference between the subsets, however, is that DCs generated from Ly-6Chigh monocytes account for most of the CD103+ DCs (Fig. 2D, compare height of black bars). Ly-6Clow and Ly-6Chigh monocytes appeared to contribute similarly to CD11bhigh DCs (Fig. 2D), closely resembling the outcome after monocyte adoptive transfer of Ly-6Chigh monocytes (14).

By comparison to interstitial lung DCs, BAL DCs were more slowly and less efficiently labeled and, even after normalization, only ~20% of total DCs were replaced collectively by the two monocyte subsets within 6 days (Fig. 2D). Labeled DCs in the BAL were first evident at day 2, peaked at day 4, and decreased by day 6. By day 35, no latex+ DCs were found in BAL (data not shown), indicating that the label does not persist in the BAL indefinitely. Just as for interstitial DCs, essentially all latex-labeled CD103+ DCs in BAL arose only from the Ly-6Chigh monocyte subset (Fig. 2D), but both labeled monocytes subsets became CD103CD11bhigh DCs.

Monocyte subsets and pulmonary DC subsets in parabiotic mice show matched frequency of mixing between parabionts

Considering this evidence along with the finding that adoptively transferred monocytes could, at minimum, differentiate into CD11bhigh DCs (14), we closely examined monocyte subsets in parabiotic mice and specifically compared the degree of mixing between the parabiotic partner genotypes within each blood monocyte subset to the degree of mixing of partner genotypes in pulmonary DC populations. Similar to Liu et al. (38), we observed that Ly-6Chigh monocytes (called inflammatory monocytes by Liu et al. (38)) were not fully mixed between the partners, possibly because the Ly-6Chigh monocytes emigrate from bone marrow and clear from the bloodstream more rapidly than they were able to mix between partners (38) (Fig. 3A). In these same parabiotic partners, however, blood Ly-6Clow monocytes were more evenly mixed between the partners (Fig. 3A), in agreement with Liu et al. (38) who called these cells "stationary monocytes." Blood Ly-6Clow monocytes arise with a few days delay from Ly-6Chigh monocytes (13, 16, 28); therefore, these monocytes likely had circulated to the other partner before or during their conversion from Ly-6Chigh monocytes. Pulmonary CD103+ DCs showed a very similar degree of mixing between partner genotypes as Ly-6Chigh monocytes, whereas CD11bhigh DCs showed the same degree of mixing as observed in Ly-6Clow monocytes (Fig. 3A). These data, therefore, lead to a similar indication as the latex bead tracking approach above, suggesting that Ly-6Clow monocytes preferentially give rise to CD11bhigh DCs and that CD103+ pulmonary DCs primarily derive from Ly-6Chigh monocytes. Next, in individual mice, a correlation with the fraction of Ly-6Clow monocytes and the fraction of CD11bhigh pulmonary DCs was observed in response to LPS challenge. Introduction of LPS into the airway led to a doubling in the number of DCs in the BAL 24 h later (data not shown), a condition in which new DCs are rapidly recruited. LPS treatment intranasally also shifted monocyte toward the Ly-6Clow subset (Fig. 3B). We observed a close correlation between the fraction of Ly-6Clow monocytes and the fraction of CD11bhigh pulmonary DCs in lung and BAL using two types of LPS (Fig. 3B). These data fit well with the possibility that newly recruited monocytes during inflammation may differentiate into pulmonary DC subsets that reflect the frequency of monocyte subsets in the blood. In particular, there was a strong relationship between the percentage of Ly-6Clow monocytes in blood and the percentage of BAL or lung DCs (Fig. 3B) that were CD11bhigh, in agreement with the hypothesis that Ly-6Clow monocytes give rise to CD11bhigh DCs and Ly-6Chigh monocytes to CD103+ DCs.


Figure 3
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 3. Analysis of monocyte subset and pulmonary DC mixing between parabiotic mice and effect of intranasal LPS on monocytes and pulmonary DCs. A, Eight weeks after parabiosis of WT CD45.1+ and WT CD45.2+ mice, each partner was examined for the fraction of CD45.1+ and CD45.2+ cells in Ly-6Chigh and Ly-6Clow blood monocyte subsets and in CD11blow and CD11bhigh pulmonary DCs. Data from the CD45.1+ partner shown as stack bar graphs charting the frequency of CD45.1+ and CD45.2+ cells in these populations. B, Individual mice were treated intranasally with 5 µg of LPS from Escherichia coli strain 055:B5 (LPSa), LPS from E. coli strain 026:B6 (LPSb), or no LPS. Upper bar graphs, Percentage of CD11bhigh and CD11blow DCs recruited to the lungs and airways 1 day after LPS treatments. Lower bar graph, Percentage of Ly-6Clow and Ly-6Chigh monocyte shifts in the blood 1 day after LPS treatments. These data show results of one experiment (n = 3 per experimental cohort) that are representative of a total of three experiments conducted.

 
Analysis of CCR2 and CX3CR1 pathways in mice reconstituted with mixed bone marrow cells

To further test the respective roles of monocyte subsets in serving as precursors of pulmonary DCs, we analyzed how pulmonary DC subsets were affected by perturbations in the major chemokine receptor pathways that characterize the monocyte subsets. Ly-6Chigh monocytes express CCR2 (15, 24) and use it to exit the bone marrow and enter blood (27), such that in CCR2-deficient mice, Ly-6Clow monocytes in the blood are nearly normal (21, 25) but Ly-6Chigh monocytes are markedly reduced (21, 27). Thus, if Ly-6Chigh monocytes were crucial precursors for CD103+ pulmonary DCs, then these DCs should be more readily replaced by WT precursors than CCR2–/– precursors in chimeric mice bearing mixed bone marrow cells from WT and CCR2–/– mice.

Ly-6Clow monocytes express lower levels of CCR2 than Ly-6Chigh monocytes (25) (Fig. 1C), but they express high levels of CX3CR1 (15). We observed that CD11bhigh pulmonary DCs were markedly and selectively reduced in naive CX3CR1-deficient mice (CX3CR1gfp/gfp; Fig. 4A). That is, the total number of pulmonary DCs was not altered in these strains, but the fraction of CD11bhigh DCs was significantly reduced compared with their WT counterparts (Fig. 4A). Thus, in addition to generating mixed bone marrow chimeras to analyze the role of CCR2 in maintaining CD103+ pulmonary DCs in the steady state, we generated bone marrow chimeras wherein WT and CX3CR1-deficient cells were competed to determine whether reduced CD11bhigh pulmonary DCs might be linked, at least in part, to a defect in Ly-6Clow monocytes.


Figure 4
View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 4. Evaluation of the role of CCR2 and CX3CR1 in generating DC subsets in the lung. A, The total number (left) and percentage of CD11bhigh DC and CD11blowCD103+ DC in BAL (right) of individual WT or CX3CR1gfp/gfp (G = gfp) mice are shown. Each point plotted represents analysis of a single mouse. B, Absolute numbers of Ly-6Chigh or Ly-6Clow monocyte subsets in the blood of chimeric mice (left). Data shown are from one experiment with n = 4 mice per experiment, representative of four experiments conducted. C, Representative flow cytometric evaluation of monocyte subsets in the blood (left) and bone marrow (right) of mice reconstituted with equal amounts of CD45.1+ WT bone marrow cells and CD45.2+ CX3CR1gfp/gfp bone marrow cells. CD115+ monocytes were gated before the generation of these plots to reveal the frequency of Ly-6Chigh and Ly-6Clow monocytes that were from WT (CD45.2CD45.1+) or CX3CR1-deficient (CD45.2+) mice. D, Bcl-2 expression was analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR in sorted Ly-6Clow monocytes. Data are representative of two independent sorts and analyses. E, Analysis of pulmonary DC subsets in mice with chimeric, mixed bone marrow. One representative analysis in BAL and lung is shown for all chimeric animals. Cells were gated on total DCs. We determined the relative frequency of CD11bhigh DCs to CD11blow DCs (CD11bhigh DC/CD11blow DC) in each animal for both genotypes in the chimera (italicized numbers to the right of the dot plots) and then made a ratio of those two genotype values (CD45.1/CD45.2, ratio shown as bolded numeral near the lower right quadrant of each dot plot). We separately analyzed DCs in the BAL (upper panels) and the lung interstitium (lower panels). F, Scatter plot graph shows analyzed pulmonary DC subsets for all individual chimeric mice studied. Differences between WT:WT and WT:CCR2–/– or WT:CX3CR1–/– cohorts are significantly different, p < 0.001. Throughout this figure, CCR2 refers to CCR2–/– cells and CX3CR1 to CX3CR1-deficient cells.

 
Chimeric mice were generated in lethally irradiated CD45.1+ WT mice that received various mixtures of congenic bone marrow cells. Different cohorts received a 1:1 mixture of CD45.1+ WT and CD45.2+ WT bone marrow cells; a 1:1 mixture of CD45.1+ WT and CD45.2+ CCR2–/– bone marrow cells; or a 1:1 mixture of CD45.1+ WT and CD45.2+ CX3CR1gfp/gfp bone marrow cells. A control group received 100% CD45.2+ WT bone marrow cells to verify that the radiation procedure fully eliminated host bone marrow.

Analysis of the blood of mice that received a mixture of WT and CX3CR1-deficient cells revealed a selective deficiency in the number of Ly-6Clow monocytes that derived from CX3CR1-deficient cells, compared with their WT CD45.2+ counterparts (Fig. 4B). Ly-6Clow CX3CR1-deficient monocytes were not elevated in the bone marrow compared with WT monocytes in the same animals, since the fraction of CX3CR1-deficient monocytes (CD45.2+) that were Ly-6Clow was below the fraction of WT (CD45.2 CD45.1+) Ly-6Clow monocytes (Fig. 4C). Thus, CX3CR1 is apparently not required for Ly-6Clow monocytes to exit the bone marrow, as is the case for Ly-6Chigh monocytes in CCR2-deficient mice (27), but instead this chemokine receptor is apparently involved in a more downstream step that involves the conversion of Ly6Chigh monocytes into Ly6Clow monocytes or survival of these monocytes. When we examined expression of the classic antiapoptotic gene bcl-2 in Ly-6Clow monocytes, we observed that bcl-2 mRNA was very low in CX3CR1gfp/gfp compared with WT Ly-6Clow monocytes (Fig. 4D), suggesting the possibility that Ly6Clow CX3CR1-deficient monocytes may be more susceptible to death by apoptosis than their WT counterparts.

To analyze how the lack of chemokine receptors affected repopulation of pulmonary DCs, we reasoned that if both of the genotypes in the mixed bone marrow chimeras were equally efficient in generating CD103+CD11blow and CD11bhigh pulmonary DC subsets, the ratio of the pulmonary DC subsets relative to each other should be close to a value of 1.0 when the two genotypes were compared. The total number of DCs was not significantly different between the various chimeric animals (data not shown). Thus, we determined the relative frequency of CD11bhigh DCs to CD11blow DCs in each animal for both genotypes in the chimera and then made a ratio of those two values (Fig. 4E). We separately analyzed DCs in the BAL and the lung interstitium. Indeed, when data from all mice were compiled, these ratios hovered near 1.0 in the WT mixed chimeras (Fig. 4F). However, CCR2-deficient cells were less able to repopulate CD103+CD11blow DCs relative to CD11bhigh DCs, shifting the ratio toward a value of 2.0 (Fig. 4F), indicative of a requirement for CCR2 in optimal reconstitution of CD103+CD11blow DCs. Conversely, CX3CR1-deficient cells were less able to repopulate CD11bhigh DCs, shifting the ratio significantly below 1.0 (Fig. 4F), illustrating a critical role for CX3CR1 in reconstituting CD11bhigh DCs. Fig. 4F shows data for BAL DCs and very similar results were observed for interstitial DCs. Thus, the failure of CCR2- and CX3CR1-deficient cells to allow normal numbers of Ly-6Chigh and Ly-6Clow monocytes to circulate, respectively, correlates with a failure of CCR2- and CX3CR1-deficient cells to populate CD103+CD11blow and CD11bhigh pulmonary DCs, respectively. These data are in close agreement with the other experimental approaches shown in Figs. 2 and 3, together strongly supporting the conclusion that CCR2+ Ly-6Chigh monocytes replenish CD103+CD11blow pulmonary DCs, whereas CX3CR1+/+ Ly-6Clow monocytes replenish CD11bhigh DCs.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
Previous studies on the role of monocytes as DC precursors had led to the emergence of a view that monocytes may only convert to DCs during inflammation (39). In the steady state, monocytes do not contribute to the DC populations in spleen (13, 40, 41), but following infection or sterile inflammation, they become a specialized type of splenic DCs and/or develop into DCs in other inflamed organs (15, 17, 21, 41, 42). However, recent data indicate that after DCs are artificially ablated in the airway and lung, adoptively transferred monocytes can contribute to their repopulation (13), and further work revealed that monocytes became pulmonary DCs in resting mice even in the absence of ablation or overt inflammation (14). These studies raised the possibility that DCs in peripheral organs, including but not limited to lung, may arise at least to some extent from monocytes in the steady state. A major limitation of these studies is that by tracing GFP+ DCs in CX3CR1gfp/+ mice, CD11blowCD103+ DCs were missed, since we show that CD11bhigh DCs but not CD103+ DCs are GFP+ in CX3CR1gfp/+ mice. Our approach permitted analyses of both conventional pulmonary DC subpopulations. We confirm a role for monocytes as precursors of pulmonary DCs in the absence of inflammation and we reveal for the first time that both monocyte subsets differentiate differently after recruitment into lung, respectively, developing into distinct subsets of conventional DCs in the airway and lung interstitium.

We took four different experimental approaches in this work. One particularly powerful method for assessing the potential validity of relationships of monocyte subsets with particular populations of DCs or macrophages, providing that they are rapidly turned over by blood precursors, is parabiosis, since monocyte subsets are not shared equally between parabiotic partners (Ref. 38) and Fig. 3). DCs in the lung turnover rapidly, and we found that the extent to which these DCs have mixed between parabiotic partners relates to the extent of mixing that occurred in blood monocytes. That is, the mixing of genotypes between parabionts from Ly-6Chigh monocytes is similar to the mixing observed in CD103+ pulmonary DCs. A different degree of mixing occurred for CD11bhigh DCs and this matched circulating Ly-6Clow monocytes closely. Results from this and all other methods we used converged on the conclusion that Ly-6Clow monocytes appear to be precursors of CD11bhigh DCs and do not contribute to CD103+ DCs. By contrast, all methods indicated that Ly-6Chigh monocytes were selectively able to generate CD103+ DCs. The fact that so many distinct approaches, each with differing underlying principles and each with different pros and cons, converge on similar outcomes strongly suggest that CD11bhigh DCs are mainly repopulated by Ly-6Clow monocytes, whereas CD103+ DCs selectively derive from Ly-6Chigh monocytes.

Indeed, we strongly advocate a multipronged approach to tracing monocytes, because each approach adds power to evaluation of the hypothesis. To illustrate, one might argue that a small number of cells other than, for instance, Ly-6Clow monocytes took up latex beads in the circulation and became pulmonary DCs rather than the Ly-6Clow monocytes. If that were true, then to fit with data from the other approaches the "mystery precursor" would not only have had to acquire latex beads in a similar manner as these monocytes, but they would have to have the same degree of mixing between parabiotic partners as the monocytes, the same profile as Ly-6Clow monocytes in responding to intranasal LPS, and the same responses to the absence of CX3CR1 as Ly-6Clow monocytes when we generated mixed chimeric mice. The probability that all of these characteristics would closely overlap in two unrelated cells is very low. Indeed, this probability would likely be much lower than the probability that the contaminating cells in monocyte adoptive transfer experiments, rather than the monocytes, are the real precursors for DCs observed in tissues after transfer. Only ~2% of adoptively transferred cells can be recovered after transfer (15), increasing the chances that robust or proliferative contaminants could account for the source of progeny in adoptive transfer-based fate mapping. Finally, we also see an advantage of coupling parabiotic and chimerism studies with manipulative techniques that involve labeling or adoptive transfer of monocytes, because when all approaches agree, it is difficult to argue that the findings are simply an artifact of manipulation.

Similar to adoptive transfer experiments (14), our latex-labeling approach suggested that CD11bhigh DCs could also be generated from Ly-6Chigh monocytes. However, again, if Ly-6Chigh monocytes directly contributed substantially to CD11bhigh pulmonary DCs, data from parabiotic mice, LPS challenge, and bone marrow chimeras would likely not reveal such a close correlation between the frequency and genotype of circulating Ly-6Clow monocytes and CD11bhigh DCs in the lung, since these relationships would be obscured if both monocyte subsets were able to efficiently replenish CD11bhigh DCs. Thus, the observations that Ly-6Chigh monocytes can replenish CD11bhigh DCs after adoptive transfer (14) or latex-labeling of endogenous monocytes, as done herein, are may be explained by the fact that Ly-6Chigh monocytes can convert to Ly-6Clow monocytes, so that such conversion somewhat masks the critical role of Ly-6Clow monocytes in replenishing CD11bhigh DCs, although this possibility remains to be explored. Another possibility is that Ly-6Chigh monocytes directly differentiate into both types of DCs, but they become CD11bhigh DCs much less efficiently than Ly-6Clow monocytes, such that their contribution to CD11bhigh DCs is apparent only in assays wherein the Ly-6Clow monocytes are absent or reduced (such as the several day period following clodronate liposomes).

CCR2 is critical in monocyte homeostasis, at least in part because this chemokine receptor is needed for Ly-6Chigh monocytes to egress from the bone marrow (27). Consequently, CCR2–/– mice have dramatically reduced blood Ly-6Chigh monocytes (21, 27), but normal Ly-6Clow monocytes (21). Ly-6Clow monocytes are CCR2 negative but express high levels of CX3CR1. A role for CX3CR1 in the homeostasis of Ly-6Clow monocytes has not been previously appreciated. When we quantified Ly-6Clow monocytes in mixed bone marrow chimeras wherein WT and CX3CR1-deficient hemopoietic cells were present in the same host, there was a marked reduction of Ly-6Clow CX3CR1–/– monocytes compared with WT monocytes in the same animal. In contrast to the role for CCR2 in driving emigration of Ly-6Chigh monocytes from the bone marrow, this defect in Ly-6Clow monocytes could not be attributed to failure of Ly-6Clow monocytes to emigrate from the bone marrow. Instead, we found that CX3CR1 was needed to maintain bcl-2 expression in Ly-6Clow monocytes, raising the possibility that CX3CR1 regulates their survival at least in some conditions through expression of survival genes such as bcl-2. A role for CX3CR1 in survival might have been anticipated from previous studies wherein a 1:1 mixture of CX3CR1gfp/+ and CX3CR1gfp/gfp Ly-6Clow monocytes was transferred into WT hosts revealed a 80% relative loss of CX3CR1gfp/gfp monocytes compared with CX3CR1gfp/+ monocytes not only in lung but also in blood (15), suggesting that survival of CX3CR1gfp/gfp in the circulation was reduced. However, those data were instead interpreted to indicate a role for CX3CR1 in monocyte migration. Other studies reported generally fewer F4/80+ blood cells in the absence of CX3CL1, consistent with a need for CX3CL1 and CX3CR1 for survival of some monocytes (43). These findings raise the need to consider a role for CX3CR1 in monocyte survival and not solely as a mediator of trafficking. A role for CX3CR1 in Ly-6Clow monocyte survival could directly lead to the observed decrease in CD11bhigh DCs in the lung, but there may also be direct roles for CX3CR1 in maintaining survival in other locations, including the lung itself.

Because CCR2+ monocytes respond robustly to inflammation, Ly-6Chigh CCR2+ monocytes in the mouse are often called "inflammatory monocytes." This term should be used carefully to avoid the implication that these monocytes may preferentially develop into effectors of inflammation. Instead, our data indicate that in lung they are selectively prone to give rise to CD103+ DCs. Inasmuch as CD103+ DCs can be linked to events in the negative regulation of immune responses (3, 4), these monocytes do not seem to necessarily generate inflammation-promoting differentiation products. CCR2+ monocytes are also linked to the replenishment of skin Langerhans cells in severe injury (36), and Langerhans cells, likewise, appear to function in many instances as negative regulators of immune responses (44). Furthermore, the cells referred to as Gr-1+ myeloid suppressor cells that become highly elevated in tumor-bearing mice possess a phenotype that is closely overlapping with, and possibly identical to, Ly-6Chigh monocytes (45). Thus, there may be multiple instances wherein Ly-6Chigh monocytes give rise to differentiated APCs that work to curtail immune reactivity. Finally, it is known that depletion of Gr-1+ cells in mouse models of asthma destroys the normal underlying mechanisms in negative immune regulation and promotes airway inflammation (46). Whereas this outcome can be at least partly explained by the depletion of plasmacytoid DCs in the lung with anti-Gr-1 Ab, it is also possible that the depletion of Ly-6Chigh (Gr-1+) monocytes contributed to the loss of negative regulation. It is obvious that a more detailed analysis of the functional roles of CD103+ and CD11bhigh DCs is needed, although recent progress has been made (4, 5). Because we reveal that these DC populations in lung are differentially replenished by distinct monocyte subsets that, respectively, use distinct chemokine receptor pathways, approaches to alter the composition of pulmonary DC subpopulations for the possible modulation of pulmonary immune responses and inflammation becomes evident.


    Disclosures
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
The authors have no financial conflict of interest.


    Footnotes
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants AI49653 (to G.J.R.) and HL086899 and CA112100 (to M.M.), National Institutes of Health Postdoctoral Fellowships to C.J., F.T., and F.G., the German Research Foundation, and the Phillippe Foundation, respectively. Back

2 Current address: Medical Clinic III, University Hospital Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany. Back

3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Gwendalyn J. Randolph, Department of Gene and Cell Medicine, 1425 Madison Avenue, Box 1496, New York, NY 10029. E-mail address: Gwendalyn.Randolph{at}mssm.edu Back

4 Abbreviations used in this paper: DC, dendritic cell; WT, wild type; BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; MHC II, MHC class II. Back

Received for publication September 27, 2007. Accepted for publication December 13, 2007.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 

  1. Sung, S. J., S. M. Fu, C. E. Rose, Jr, F. Gaskin, S. T. Ju, S. R. Beaty. 2006. A major lung CD103 {alpha}E7 integrin-positive epithelial dendritic cell population expressing langerin and tight junction proteins. J. Immunol. 176: 2161-2172. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Agace, W. W., J. M. Higgins, B. Sadasivan, M. B. Brenner, C. M. Parker. 2000. T-lymphocyte-epithelial-cell interactions: integrin {alpha}ECD103β7, LEEP-CAM, and chemokines. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 12: 563-568. [Medline]
  3. Annacker, O., J. L. Coombes, V. Malmstrom, H. H. Uhlig, T. Bourne, B. Johansson-Lindbom, W. W. Agace, C. M. Parker, F. Powrie. 2005. Essential role for CD103 in the T cell-mediated regulation of experimental colitis. J. Exp. Med. 202: 1051-1061. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Coombes, J. L., K. R. Siddiqui, C. V. Arancibia-Carcamo, J. Hall, C. M. Sun, Y. Belkaid, F. Powrie. 2007. A functionally specialized population of mucosal CD103+ DCs induces Foxp3+ regulatory T cells via a TGF-β- and retinoic acid-dependent mechanism. J. Exp. Med. 204: 1757-1764. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. del Rio, M. L., J. I. Rodriguez-Barbosa, E. Kremmer, R. Forster. 2007. CD103 and CD103+ bronchial lymph node dendritic cells are specialized in presenting and cross-presenting innocuous antigen to CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. J. Immunol. 178: 6861-6866. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Beaty, S. R., C. E. Rose, Jr, S. S. Sung. 2007. Diverse and potent chemokine production by lung CD11bhigh dendritic cells in homeostasis and in allergic lung inflammation. J. Immunol. 178: 1882-1895. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Julia, V., E. M. Hessel, L. Malherbe, N. Glaichenhaus, A. O’Garra, R. L. Coffman. 2002. A restricted subset of dendritic cells captures airborne antigens and remains able to activate specific T cells long after antigen exposure. Immunity 16: 271-283. [Medline]
  8. Hintzen, G., L. Ohl, M. L. del Rio, J. I. Rodriguez-Barbosa, O. Pabst, J. R. Kocks, J. Krege, S. Hardtke, R. Forster. 2006. Induction of tolerance to innocuous inhaled antigen relies on a CCR7-dependent dendritic cell-mediated antigen transport to the bronchial lymph node. J. Immunol. 177: 7346-7354. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Holt, P. G., S. Haining, D. J. Nelson, J. D. Sedgwick. 1994. Origin and steady-state turnover of class II MHC-bearing dendritic cells in the epithelium of the conducting airways. J. Immunol. 153: 256-261. [Abstract]
  10. Holt, P. G., P. A. Stumbles. 2000. Characterization of dendritic cell populations in the respiratory tract. J. Aerosol. Med. 13: 361-367. [Medline]
  11. Legge, K. L., T. J. Braciale. 2003. Accelerated migration of respiratory dendritic cells to the regional lymph nodes is limited to the early phase of pulmonary infection. Immunity 18: 265-277. [Medline]
  12. Cook, D. N., K. Bottomly. 2007. Innate immune control of pulmonary dendritic cell trafficking. Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. 4: 234-239. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Varol, C., L. Landsman, D. K. Fogg, L. Greenshtein, B. Gildor, R. Margalit, V. Kalchenko, F. Geissmann, S. Jung. 2007. Monocytes give rise to mucosal, but not splenic, conventional dendritic cells. J. Exp. Med. 204: 171-180. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Landsman, L., C. Varol, S. Jung. 2007. Distinct differentiation potential of blood monocyte subsets in the lung. J. Immunol. 178: 2000-2007. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Geissmann, F., S. Jung, D. R. Littman. 2003. Blood monocytes consist of two principal subsets with distinct migratory properties. Immunity 19: 71-82. [Medline]
  16. Sunderkotter, C., T. Nikolic, M. J. Dillon, N. Van Rooijen, M. Stehling, D. A. Drevets, P. J. Leenen. 2004. Subpopulations of mouse blood monocytes differ in maturation stage and inflammatory response. J. Immunol. 172: 4410-4417. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Le Borgne, M., N. Etchart, A. Goubier, S. A. Lira, J. C. Sirard, N. van Rooijen, C. Caux, S. Ait-Yahia, A. Vicari, D. Kaiserlian, B. Dubois. 2006. Dendritic cells rapidly recruited into epithelial tissues via CCR6/CCL20 are responsible for CD8+ T cell crosspriming in vivo. Immunity 24: 191-201. [Medline]
  18. Drevets, D. A., P. J. Leenen, R. A. Greenfield. 2004. Invasion of the central nervous system by intracellular bacteria. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 17: 323-347. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Xu, H., A. Manivannan, R. Dawson, I. J. Crane, M. Mack, P. Sharp, J. Liversidge. 2005. Differentiation to the CCR2+ inflammatory phenotype in vivo is a constitutive, time-limited property of blood monocytes and is independent of local inflammatory mediators. J. Immunol. 175: 6915-6923. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Robben, P. M., M. LaRegina, W. A. Kuziel, L. D. Sibley. 2005. Recruitment of Gr-1+ monocytes is essential for control of acute toxoplasmosis. J. Exp. Med. 201: 1761-1769. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Qu, C., E. W. Edwards, F. Tacke, V. Angeli, J. Llodra, G. Sanchez-Schmitz, A. Garin, N. S. Haque, W. Peters, N. van Rooijen, et al 2004. Role of CCR8 and other chemokine pathways in the migration of monocyte-derived dendritic cells to lymph nodes. J. Exp. Med. 200: 1231-1241. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Tacke, F., D. Alvarez, T. J. Kaplan, C. Jakubzick, R. Spanbroek, J. Llodra, A. Garin, J. Liu, M. Mack, N. van Rooijen, et al 2007. Monocyte subsets differentially employ CCR2, CCR5, and CX3CR1 to accumulate within atherosclerotic plaques. J. Clin. Invest. 117: 185-194. [Medline]
  23. Swirski, F. K., P. Libby, E. Aikawa, P. Alcaide, F. W. Luscinskas, R. Weissleder, M. J. Pittet. 2007. Ly-6Chigh monocytes dominate hypercholesterolemia-associated monocytosis and give rise to macrophages in atheromata. J. Clin. Invest. 117: 195-205. [Medline]
  24. Palframan, R. T., S. Jung, G. Cheng, W. Weninger, Y. Luo, M. Dorf, D. R. Littman, B. J. Rollins, H. Zweerink, A. Rot, U. H. von Andrian. 2001. Inflammatory chemokine transport and presentation in HEV: a remote control mechanism for monocyte recruitment to lymph nodes in inflamed tissues. J. Exp. Med. 194: 1361-1373. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Tsou, C. L., W. Peters, Y. Si, S. Slaymaker, A. M. Aslanian, S. P. Weisberg, M. Mack, I. F. Charo. 2007. Critical roles for CCR2 and MCP-3 in monocyte mobilization from bone marrow and recruitment to inflammatory sites. J. Clin. Invest. 117: 902-909. [Medline]
  26. Passlick, B., D. Flieger, H. W. Ziegler-Heitbrock. 1989. Identification and characterization of a novel monocyte subpopulation in human peripheral blood. Blood 74: 2527-2534. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Serbina, N. V., E. G. Pamer. 2006. Monocyte emigration from bone marrow during bacterial infection requires signals mediated by chemokine receptor CCR2. Nat. Immunol. 7: 311-317. [Medline]
  28. Tacke, F., F. Ginhoux, C. Jakubzick, N. van Rooijen, M. Merad, G. J. Randolph. 2006. Immature monocytes acquire antigens from other cells in the bone marrow and present them to T cells after maturing in the periphery. J. Exp. Med. 203: 583-597. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Eggan, K., S. Jurga, R. Gosden, I. M. Min, A. J. Wagers. 2006. Ovulated oocytes in adult mice derive from non-circulating germ cells. Nature 441: 1109-1114. [Medline]
  30. Kuziel, W. A., S. J. Morgan, T. C. Dawson, S. Griffin, O. Smithies, K. Ley, N. Maeda. 1997. Severe reduction in leukocyte adhesion and monocyte extravasation in mice deficient in CC chemokine receptor 2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 12053-12058. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Jung, S., J. Aliberti, P. Graemmel, M. J. Sunshine, G. W. Kreutzberg, A. Sher, D. R. Littman. 2000. Analysis of fractalkine receptor CX3CR1 function by targeted deletion and green fluorescent protein reporter gene insertion. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20: 4106-4114. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Van Rooijen, N., A. Sanders. 1994. Liposome mediated depletion of macrophages: mechanism of action, preparation of liposomes, and applications. J. Immunol. Methods 174: 83-93. [Medline]
  33. Mack, M., J. Cihak, C. Simonis, B. Luckow, A. E. Proudfoot, J. Plachy, H. Bruhl, M. Frink, H. J. Anders, V. Vielhauer, et al 2001. Expression and characterization of the chemokine receptors CCR2 and CCR5 in mice. J. Immunol. 166: 4697-4704. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Vermaelen, K. Y., I. Carro-Muino, B. N. Lambrecht, R. A. Pauwels. 2001. Specific migratory dendritic cells rapidly transport antigen from the airways to the thoracic lymph nodes. J. Exp. Med. 193: 51-60. [Medline]
  35. Kirby, A. C., J. G. Raynes, P. M. Kaye. 2006. CD11b regulates recruitment of alveolar macrophages but not pulmonary dendritic cells after pneumococcal challenge. J. Infect. Dis. 193: 205-213. [Medline]
  36. Ginhoux, F., F. Tacke, V. Angeli, M. Bogunovic, M. Loubeau, X. M. Dai, E. R. Stanley, G. J. Randolph, M. Merad. 2006. Langerhans cells arise from monocytes in vivo. Nat. Immunol. 7: 265-273. [Medline]
  37. Swirski, F. K., M. J. Pittet, M. F. Kircher, E. Aikawa, F. A. Jaffer, P. Libby, R. Weissleder. 2006. Monocyte accumulation in mouse atherogenesis is progressive and proportional to extent of disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 10340-10345. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Liu, K., C. Waskow, X. Liu, K. Yao, J. Hoh, M. Nussenzweig. 2007. Origin of dendritic cells in peripheral lymphoid organs of mice. Nat. Immunol. 8: 578-583. [Medline]
  39. Shortman, K., S. H. Naik. 2007. Steady-state and inflammatory dendritic-cell development. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 7: 19-30. [Medline]
  40. Fogg, D. K., C. Sibon, C. Miled, S. Jung, P. Aucouturier, D. R. Littman, A. Cumano, F. Geissmann. 2006. A clonogenic bone marrow progenitor specific for macrophages and dendritic cells. Science 311: 83-87. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Naik, S. H., D. Metcalf, A. van Nieuwenhuijze, I. Wicks, L. Wu, M. O’Keeffe, K. Shortman. 2006. Intrasplenic steady-state dendritic cell precursors that are distinct from monocytes. Nat. Immunol. 7: 663-671. [Medline]
  42. Randolph, G. J., K. Inaba, D. F. Robbiani, R. M. Steinman, W. A. Muller. 1999. Differentiation of phagocytic monocytes into lymph node dendritic cells in vivo. Immunity 11: 753-761. [Medline]
  43. Cook, D. N., S. C. Chen, L. M. Sullivan, D. J. Manfra, M. T. Wiekowski, D. M. Prosser, G. Vassileva, S. A. Lira. 2001. Generation and analysis of mice lacking the chemokine fractalkine. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21: 3159-3165. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Romani, N., S. Ebner, C. H. Tripp, V. Flacher, F. Koch, P. Stoitzner. 2006. Epidermal Langerhans cells: changing views on their function in vivo. Immunol. Lett. 106: 119-125. [Medline]
  45. Huang, Q., D. Liu, P. Majewski, L. C. Schulte, J. M. Korn, R. A. Young, E. S. Lander, N. Hacohen. 2001. The plasticity of dendritic cell responses to pathogens and their components. Science 294: 870-875. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. De Heer, H. J., H. Hammad, T. Soullie, D. Hijdra, N. Vos, M. A. Willart, H. C. Hoogsteden, B. N. Lambrecht. 2004. Essential role of lung plasmacytoid dendritic cells in preventing asthmatic reactions to harmless inhaled antigen. J. Exp. Med. 200: 89-98. [Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. Diao, J. Zhao, E. Winter, and M. S. Cattral
Recruitment and Differentiation of Conventional Dendritic Cell Precursors in Tumors
J. Immunol., February 1, 2010; 184(3): 1261 - 1267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
F. Ginhoux, K. Liu, J. Helft, M. Bogunovic, M. Greter, D. Hashimoto, J. Price, N. Yin, J. Bromberg, S. A. Lira, et al.
The origin and development of nonlymphoid tissue CD103+ DCs
J. Exp. Med., December 21, 2009; 206(13): 3115 - 3130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. J. Osterholzer, G.-H. Chen, M. A. Olszewski, J. L. Curtis, G. B. Huffnagle, and G. B. Toews
Accumulation of CD11b+ Lung Dendritic Cells in Response to Fungal Infection Results from the CCR2-Mediated Recruitment and Differentiation of Ly-6Chigh Monocytes
J. Immunol., December 15, 2009; 183(12): 8044 - 8053.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
A. M. Manicone, I. Huizar, and J. K. McGuire
Matrilysin (Matrix Metalloproteinase-7) Regulates Anti-Inflammatory and Antifibrotic Pulmonary Dendritic Cells That Express CD103 ({alpha}E{beta}7-Integrin)
Am. J. Pathol., December 1, 2009; 175(6): 2319 - 2331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
M. A.M. Willart, H. Jan de Heer, H. Hammad, T. Soullie, K. Deswarte, B. E. Clausen, L. Boon, H. C. Hoogsteden, and B. N. Lambrecht
The lung vascular filter as a site of immune induction for T cell responses to large embolic antigen
J. Exp. Med., November 23, 2009; 206(12): 2823 - 2835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
E. L. Gautier, C. Jakubzick, and G. J. Randolph
Regulation of the Migration and Survival of Monocyte Subsets by Chemokine Receptors and Its Relevance to Atherosclerosis
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, October 1, 2009; 29(10): 1412 - 1418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. Komaru, Y. Ueda, A. Furuya, S. Tanaka, K. Yoshida, T. Kato, H. Kinoh, Y. Harada, H. Suzuki, M. Inoue, et al.
Sustained and NK/CD4+ T Cell-Dependent Efficient Prevention of Lung Metastasis Induced by Dendritic Cells Harboring Recombinant Sendai Virus
J. Immunol., October 1, 2009; 183(7): 4211 - 4219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
M. V. Lukens, D. Kruijsen, F. E. J. Coenjaerts, J. L. L. Kimpen, and G. M. van Bleek
Respiratory Syncytial Virus-Induced Activation and Migration of Respiratory Dendritic Cells and Subsequent Antigen Presentation in the Lung-Draining Lymph Node
J. Virol., July 15, 2009; 83(14): 7235 - 7243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
K. Liu, G. D. Victora, T. A. Schwickert, P. Guermonprez, M. M. Meredith, K. Yao, F.-F. Chu, G. J. Randolph, A. Y. Rudensky, and M. Nussenzweig
In Vivo Analysis of Dendritic Cell Development and Homeostasis
Science, April 17, 2009; 324(5925): 392 - 397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
C. Auffray, D. K. Fogg, E. Narni-Mancinelli, B. Senechal, C. Trouillet, N. Saederup, J. Leemput, K. Bigot, L. Campisi, M. Abitbol, et al.
CX3CR1+ CD115+ CD135+ common macrophage/DC precursors and the role of CX3CR1 in their response to inflammation
J. Exp. Med., March 16, 2009; 206(3): 595 - 606.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
Y. Peng, Y. Latchman, and K. B. Elkon
Ly6Clow Monocytes Differentiate into Dendritic Cells and Cross-Tolerize T Cells through PDL-1
J. Immunol., March 1, 2009; 182(5): 2777 - 2785.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
L. Landsman, L. Bar-On, A. Zernecke, K.-W. Kim, R. Krauthgamer, E. Shagdarsuren, S. A. Lira, I. L. Weissman, C. Weber, and S. Jung
CX3CR1 is required for monocyte homeostasis and atherogenesis by promoting cell survival
Blood, January 22, 2009; 113(4): 963 - 972.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
C. Jakubzick, M. Bogunovic, A. J. Bonito, E. L. Kuan, M. Merad, and G. J. Randolph
Lymph-migrating, tissue-derived dendritic cells are minor constituents within steady-state lymph nodes
J. Exp. Med., November 24, 2008; 205(12): 2839 - 2850.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
D. A. Hume
Macrophages as APC and the Dendritic Cell Myth
J. Immunol., November 1, 2008; 181(9): 5829 - 5835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M.-L. del Rio, J.-I. Rodriguez-Barbosa, J. Bolter, M. Ballmaier, O. Dittrich-Breiholz, M. Kracht, S. Jung, and R. Forster
CX3CR1+c-kit+ Bone Marrow Cells Give Rise to CD103+ and CD103- Dendritic Cells with Distinct Functional Properties
J. Immunol., November 1, 2008; 181(9): 6178 - 6188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
E. Jaensson, H. Uronen-Hansson, O. Pabst, B. Eksteen, J. Tian, J. L. Coombes, P.-L. Berg, T. Davidsson, F. Powrie, B. Johansson-Lindbom, et al.
Small intestinal CD103+ dendritic cells display unique functional properties that are conserved between mice and humans
J. Exp. Med., September 1, 2008; 205(9): 2139 - 2149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
J. McGill, N. Van Rooijen, and K. L. Legge
Protective influenza-specific CD8 T cell responses require interactions with dendritic cells in the lungs
J. Exp. Med., July 7, 2008; 205(7): 1635 - 1646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jakubzick, C.
Right arrow Articles by Randolph, G. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jakubzick, C.
Right arrow Articles by Randolph, G. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS