|
|
||||||||

* Department of Rheumatology and
Department of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
both in vitro and in vivo. In vivo, Treg cells suppressed IL-6 production in response to LPS injection in mice. In contrast, Treg cells from TNFRII-deficient mice were unable to do so despite their unhampered capacity to suppress T cell proliferation in a conventional in vitro suppression assay. Thus, shedding of TNFRII represents a novel mechanism by which Treg cells can inhibit the action of TNF, a pivotal cytokine driving inflammation. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Despite accumulating evidence for the immunoregulatory properties of CD4+CD25+ Treg cells, the mechanism by which CD4+CD25+ Treg cells inhibit T cell-independent inflammation is not well defined. CD4+CD25+ Treg cells are anergic to TCR stimulation in vitro and capable of inhibiting proliferation and cytokine production of other T cells by secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-10 and TGF-β) and a mechanism that depends on CTLA-4 and membrane-bound TGF-β (5, 6).
We previously showed that adoptive transfer of Treg cells decreases levels of acute phase proteins such as the serum amyloid P component in mice that had been injected with CFA (our unpublished observations) or had underwent total body irradiation (7). For that reason, we hypothesized that Treg cells shed a soluble mediator that can inhibit the induction of acute phase responses. TNF-
is one of the most prominent initiators of the acute phase reaction that can, via the action of IL-6, promote the release of several acute phase proteins from the liver (8, 9, 10). In this study, we describe a novel mechanism by which Treg cells can counteract the action mediated by TNF-
.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
C57BL/6 mice and TNFRII knockout (KO) mice on a C57BL/6 background (B6.129S2-Tnfrsf1btm1Mwm/J) were maintained at Leiden University Medical Center animal facility in accordance with national legislation under the supervision of the Universitys animal experimental committee.
Isolation of murine Treg cells and culture
Murine CD4+CD25+ and CD4+CD25– T cells were isolated from spleen and lymph nodes of 6- to 14-wk-old mice by positive selection of CD4+ T cells (MACS), fluorescent labeling (anti-CD4 anti-CD25), and subsequent FACS sorting (FACSAria cell sorter; BD Biosciences) on the basis of CD25 expression. Purified T cell subsets were activated in the presence of Dynabeads mouse CD3/CD28 (Dynal Biotech) and 50 IU/ml IL-2.
Isolation of human Treg cells and culture
Isolation of human CD4+CD25high or CD4+CD25– T cells from buffy coats of healthy human donors was performed as previously described (11). FACS-sorted CD4+CD25high and CD4+CD25– cells were cultured in the presence of 1 µg/ml anti-CD28 (CLB-CD28/1; Sanquin), 5 µg/ml plate-bound anti-CD3 (OKT-3, BD Biosciences), and 100 U/ml IL-2 for up to 5 days. The metalloproteinase inhibitor marimastat was added to cultures where indicated at a final concentration of 10 µg/ml.
Suppression assay
After 3 to 4 days of in vitro activation, CD4+CD25– and CD4+CD25+ T cells were cultured with equal numbers of freshly isolated splenocytes in the presence of 1 µg/ml PHA. [3H]Thymidine incorporation of triplicates was measured 3–4 days later. Suppression assays were performed for each sorted population of CD4+CD25+ cells to ensure the suppressive capacity of isolated Treg cells.
Flow cytometry
Murine cells were stained using mAb against CD4, CD25, CD120b (TR75-89), FoxP3 (FJK-16S, eBioscience), or an isotype control. Human cells were stained using mAb against CD4 (RPA-T4), CD25 (2A3), CD120b (MR2-1, AbD Serotec and 22235, R&D Systems), CCR7 (3D12), HLA-DR (L243), CD45RO (UCHL1), CD45RA (HI100), and CD62L (Dreg 56). Intracellular FoxP3-staining was performed using eBioscience FoxP3-staining kit (PCH101 or appropriate isotype control). Abs were purchased from BD Biosciences unless otherwise stated.
TNFRI and TNFRII secretion
Souble TNFR (sTNFR) I and sTNFRII in culture supernatants were measured using standard ELISA kits (Hycult Biotechnology for murine sTNFR and R&D Systems DuoSet for human sTNFR).
Bioactivity of sTNFR
In vitro activity of sTNFR was measured using TNF-
-sensitive WEHI 164 clone 13 cells as previously described (12). In vivo activity was determined by injecting mice i.v. with 1 x 106 Treg or control cells (CD4+CD25– T cells) of either wild-type (WT) animals or TNFRII KO animals after 4 days of in vitro activation. As a control, mice were injected i.v. with 250 µg of etanercept, a TNFRII-Ig fusion protein. One hour later mice were injected i.p. with 150 µg of LPS (Salmonella typhosa, Sigma-Aldrich). Four and 6 h after LPS injection, blood samples were collected to determine serum levels of IL-6 using BD Biosciences mouse IL-6 ELISA set.
| Results and Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Adoptive transfer of CD4+CD25+ Treg cells can inhibit the induction of acute phase responses in mice (7). Because TNF-
stimulates acute phase responses (8, 9, 10), we hypothesized that CD4+CD25+ Treg cells could directly inhibit TNF-
. FACS analysis revealed that CD4+CD25+ Treg cells, as opposed to CD4+CD25– T cells, strongly express TNFRII (data not shown), leading us to predict that Treg cells may be able to shed sTNFRII. Therefore, we activated purified CD4+CD25+ and CD4+CD25– T cell populations in vitro and analyzed supernatants of these cultures for the presence of sTNFR. Although no sTNFRI could be observed (data not shown), sTNFRII was detectable in culture supernatants of CD25+ cells from day 1 onward (Fig. 1). No TNFR shedding was noted in the presence of IL-2 only (data not shown), indicating that TCR triggering is required for TNFR shedding.
|
50 times more sTNFR than their CD4+CD25– counterparts on a per cell basis (data not shown).
CD4+CD25+ Treg cell-derived sTNFRII inhibits the action of TNF-
in vitro
We next wished to examine the biologic activity of Treg cell-derived sTNFRII. For this purpose we performed a bioassay using TNF-
-sensitive WEHI cells (12). Survival of WEHI cells was measured after incubation with ranging amounts of rTNF-
in the presence or absence of culture supernatants derived from activated CD4+CD25+ and CD4+CD25– T cells. Supernatant from CD4+CD25– T cells induced
50% WEHI cell death without the addition of rTNF-
, reflecting increased shedding of TNF-
by activated CD25– effector T (Teff) cells as compared with CD4+CD25+ Treg cells. TNF-
-induced death of WEHI cells was largely prevented, however, when, next to titrated amounts of recombinant TNF-
, culture supernatant of CD4+CD25+ Treg cells was added to the wells. (Fig. 2A). To confirm that the inhibition of cell death was indeed mediated by sTNFRII, we next isolated CD4+CD25+ Treg cells from TNFRII KO mice. No inhibition of cell death was observed after the addition of culture supernatants from activated CD4+CD25+ cells derived from TNFRII KO mice (Fig. 2B). Nonetheless, these cells were at least as potent as CD4+CD25+ cells from control WT animals in a conventional in vitro T cell suppression assay, indicating that CD4+CD25+ cells from TNFRII KO animals were bona fide Treg cells with the ability to suppress Teff cells (Fig. 2C). Addition of etanercept, a soluble TNFRII-Ig fusion protein used clinically to treat rheumatoid arthritis, had comparable effects on the survival of WEHI cells (Fig. 2B). These data indicate that the ability of Treg cells to inhibit T cell proliferation is unaffected in TNFRII KO mice and further show that Treg cell-derived sTNFRII is functional because it is able to prevent the action of TNF-
in vitro.
|
TNF-
modulates the kinetics of IL-6 expression following LPS injection in mice (13, 14). IL-6, in turn, induces the expression of acute phase proteins. Thus, we reasoned that the reduction of the acute phase response observed previously (7) could be due to Treg cell-derived sTNFRII. To analyze this possibility, we injected mice i.p. with LPS 1 h after injection of CD4+CD25+ Treg cells from either WT or TNFRII KO mice. Serum IL-6 levels were analyzed at different time points following LPS injection.
At 4 and 6 h after LPS-injection, treatment with etanercept significantly reduced the amount of IL-6 produced in response to LPS, confirming that, indeed, TNF-
is involved in the induction of IL-6 following LPS injection (Fig. 3). Likewise, adoptive transfer of CD4+CD25+ Treg cells isolated from WT animals significantly decreased IL-6 production. In contrast, CD4+CD25+ Treg cells isolated from TNFRII KO animals lacked this ability, indicating that Treg cell-derived TNFRII is involved in the inhibition of the IL-6 response following injection of LPS. Together, these data show that CD4+CD25+ Treg cells can inhibit the action of TNF-
and dampen inflammation by releasing sTNFRII.
|
Given the potential implications of our findings with murine Treg for the treatment of TNF-mediated inflammatory disorders, we next investigated whether TNFR shedding would also be a feature of human Treg.
We first analyzed TNFRII-expression on freshly isolated human CD4+ T cells. TNFRII expression was found to be highest on CD4+CD25high T cells but could also be detected on CD4+CD25int (where "int" is intermediate) and on a minor fraction of CD4+CD25– T cells (Fig. 4A). In line with this, TNFRII expression was highest on, but not exclusively confined to, CD4+FoxP3+ T cells. Phenotypic analysis using markers relevant for T cell function revealed that CD4+TNFRII+ T cells were largely CD45RO+CD45RA– (Fig. 4B). Whereas CD4+TNFRII– T cells uniformly expressed CCR7 but no HLA-DR and were mostly CD62Lhigh, CD4+TNFRII+ T cells exhibited a more heterogeneous expression of these markers. Interestingly, FoxP3 expression was restricted to TNFRII+ T cells. Thus, CD4+CD25highFoxP3+ T cells that display both effector and central memory markers (15) constitutively express TNFRII and have in part lost expression of the homing receptors CD62L and CCR7.
|
converting enzyme (TACE, ADAM17), the enzyme responsible for the cleavage of TNFR from the cell surface. Inhibition of TNFR shedding by marimastat led to a strong accumulation of TNFRII on the cell surface of CD4+CD25high T cells as determined by an increase in mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of the TNFRII staining. Activation of CD4+CD25– T cells under the same conditions, however, led to an only weak increase in TNFRII MFI, indicating lower shedding activity. In line with this observation, large amounts of sTNFRII were detectable in culture supernatants of CD4+CD25high T cells, with much lower levels being produced by CD4+CD25– T cells (Fig. 5B). sTNFRI was almost undetectable in cultures of both cell types (data not shown). The difference in TNFRII levels was even more prominent when adjusting TNFRII levels in supernatants for cell counts, taking into account the stronger proliferation of CD4+CD25– T cells. In addition, calculation of the amount of TNFRII shed from day to day revealed that the shedding activity of CD4+CD25– T cells reached a peak between day 3 and 4, whereas TNFRII-shedding of CD4+CD25high T cells still increased (Fig. 5C). It is unlikely that the sTNFRII levels determined originate from activated Teff cells contaminating the CD4+CD25high T cell population, as FACS sorting and subsequent activation of CD4+CD25int T cells led to substantially lower amounts of sTNFRII in culture supernatants than activation of CD4+CD25high T cells (data not shown). Interestingly, surface staining with HLA-DR of CD4+CD25high T cells from two donors activated in the presence or absence of marimastat revealed that CD4+CD25highHLA-DR+ T cells had substantially higher shedding capacity than CD4+CD25highHLA-DR– T cells (Fig. 5D). Within the Treg cell compartment, HLA-DR has previously been described to define a population with enhanced suppressive ability. Our data indicate that the TNFR shedding capacity differs between these two subsets. This might be relevant for the in vivo function of Treg cells and further emphasizes that human Treg cell populations are composed of functionally distinct subsets (16).
|
can transiently silence the suppressive activity of Treg cells through signaling via TNFRII (17, 18). Interestingly, suppressive function was found to be restored after several days (18). Our findings showing that TNFRII is shed several days after the activation of Treg cells fit well with these observations, as the shedding of TNFRII would allow Treg cells to counteract the action of TNF-
, thereby circumventing its inhibitory effect on Treg cell function. This way, Treg cells could regain their suppressive ability to regulate the function of Teff cells and, at the same time, suppress the effects of TNF-
, a crucial mediator of acute and chronic inflammation. We have previously shown that CD4+CD25+ T cells can be used effectively in the treatment of collagen-induced arthritis (CIA), a model for systemic arthritis in mice (7, 19). Collagen-induced arthritis is primarily an Ab driven disease (20, 21) and the role of T cells is, most likely, restricted to the provision of help to B cells that produce collagen type II-specific Abs. As CD4+CD25+ Treg cells are able to reduce arthritis severity in the effector phase of the disease without affecting circulating anti-CII Abs, it is likely that the shedding of sTNFR by adoptively transferred Treg cells is involved in the inhibition of arthritis.
Finally, our data obtained with human Treg cells indicate that the mechanism we show in mice is essentially similar in the human setting. Although constitutive TNFRII expression is not confined to Treg cells, human CD4+CD25high T cells exhibit a much stronger and more sustained shedding activity upon activation when compared with CD4+CD25– T cells. This is of potential interest in the context of TNF-mediated autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, in which TNFRII-Ig fusion proteins are used effectively in therapeutic settings. Together, these data provide a rationale for the therapeutic use of Treg cells in systemic autoimmune diseases.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Disclosures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 This study was supported by Dutch Arthritis Foundation Grant 02-I-402 and by research funding from the European Community FP6 funding project 018661 Autocure. The work of R.E.M.T. was supported by a Vidi Grant from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research. H.U.S. was supported by a Pfizer Articulum Fellowship. ![]()
2 G.J.D.v.M., H.U.S., and M.H. contributed equally to this work. ![]()
3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. René E. M. Toes, Department of Rheumatology, Postal Zone C1-R, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands. E-mail address: R.E.M.Toes{at}lumc.nl ![]()
4 Abbreviations used in this paper: Treg cell, CD4+CD25+ regulatory T (cell); KO, knockout; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity; sTNFR, soluble TNF-receptor; Teff, effector T (cell); WT, wild type. ![]()
Received for publication November 20, 2007. Accepted for publication December 28, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
/TNF
-deficient mice. Mol. Med. 3: 864-875. [Medline]
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |