|
|
||||||||
Laboratory for Investigative Dermatology, Rockefeller University, New York, NY, 10021
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, and STAT-1-regulated genes). However, CSA also modulated genes from the newly described Th17 pathway (IL-17, IL-22, and downstream genes S100A12, DEFB-2, IL-1β, SEPRINB3, LCN2, and CCL20). CSA also affected dendritic cells, reducing TNF and inducible NO synthase (products of inflammatory TNF- and inducible NO synthase-producing dendritic cells), CD83, and IL-23p19. We detected 220 early response genes (day 14 posttreatment) that were down-regulated by CSA. We classified >95% into proinflammatory or skin resident cells. More myeloid-derived than activated T cell genes were modulated by CSA (54 myeloid genes compared with 11 lymphocyte genes), supporting the hypothesis that myeloid derived genes contribute to pathogenic inflammation in psoriasis. In circulating mononuclear leukocytes, in stark contrast, no inflammatory gene activity was detected. Thus, we have constructed a genomic signature of successful treatment of psoriasis which may serve as a reference to guide development of other new therapies. In addition, these data also identify new gene targets for therapeutic modulation and may be applied to wide range of autoimmune diseases. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
signature (2, 3, 4). Now it appears that there may be an important contribution from the newly described Th17 T cell population, defined by production of IL-17 (5, 6, 7, 8, 9). Th17 cells are activated by the DC cytokine IL-23, produce IL-17, IL-22, and TNF, and have many other downstream proinflammatory effects. The role of Th17 has been described in murine disease models (10) and the role of Th17 cells in human autoimmune disease is currently under investigation (8, 11, 12, 13). The effects of various therapeutic agents on Th17 cells are presently unknown. This Th17 pathway potentially offers a new therapeutic target for the treatment of autoimmune inflammation. The immunosuppressive agent cyclosporine A (CSA) has revolutionized the field of organ transplantation since it was introduced for clinical use over 20 years ago (14). CSA inhibits calcineurin (a calcium-dependent serine/threonine phosphatase) and its substrate, the NFAT (15). Successful treatment of psoriasis with CSA led to the hypothesis that psoriasis was a T cell-mediated disease (16), and subsequently to the development of the new T cell-targeted biological therapies. There are several studies that describe cellular CSA effects in psoriasis. CSA may, e.g., inhibit keratinocyte cell cycle progression (17), affect psoriatic lymphocytes and macrophages (18), and decrease production of monocyte production of IL-12 (19).
Currently, there is little information regarding genomic expression alterations with CSA in skin diseases. We are at an exciting crossroad: we now have well-documented genomic expression patterns in psoriasis, and are beginning to appreciate the complex inflammatory circuitry involved, such as epidermal hyperplasia as well as T cell and DC activation (20). However, we still need to determine the relative contributions of these different pathways so that we can develop new hypotheses and treatment targets. It would be particularly useful to evaluate the effects of treatment on the affected skin tissue vs cells from the peripheral circulation. As CSA is considered a "gold standard" systemic therapy for moderate-to-severe psoriasis, the molecular changes induced by CSA may serve as a reference to understand the therapeutic activity of other immunosuppressives.
This study provides a reference list of genomic changes that may need to be achieved to deliver a consistent therapeutic benefit or a "genomic signature" of successful antipsoriatic therapy. In response to CSA treatment, psoriatic skin lesions showed a decrease in T cells and DCs, as expected. We have profiled genes affected by CSA in skin biopsies of psoriasis patients and categorized these to a set of cell types that are relevant to skin (21). In this study, we classified >95% of CSA-regulated genes as associated with proinflammatory cells and skin resident cells such as keratinocytes and fibroblasts. We found a large number of genes affected by CSA were not only associated with T cells and keratinocytes but also with myeloid cells, e.g., monocytes and DCs (21).
The effects of CSA were further detected on genes of the type 1 pathway (e.g., p40, STAT1, IFN-
, and IL-8; Ref. 3), on the Th17 pathway (e.g., IL-17, IL-22, defensin B2 (DEFB-2), CCL20 (MIP3
), and lipocalin 2 (LCN2); Ref. 22), and genes produced by a subset of inflammatory DCs, the TNF- and inducible NO synthase (iNOS)-producing DCs (Tip-DCs; e.g., suppression of and iNOS and TNF; Refs. 23 and 24). This knowledge can be further applied to better the understanding of disease pathogenesis of a wide range of autoimmune diseases and lead to new therapeutic targets.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Eleven patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis were enrolled in this study, which was approved by The Rockefeller University Hospital Institutional Review Board. Informed consent was obtained from volunteers before their participation and the study was performed with strict adherence to the Declaration of Helsinki principles. Major inclusion criteria were: involvement of psoriasis vulgaris of >10% body surface area, neither systemic treatment for at least 4 wk nor topical treatment for at least 2 wk before entering the study, no significant infections or immune suppression, and no significant renal, hepatic, or other medical disease.
The patients were treated twice daily with 4 mg/kg/day CSA per os Five skin biopsies and two blood samples were taken. The link to the trial is available on the following website: www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/ NCT00050648?order = 1.
Peripheral blood isolation
Peripheral blood draws were taken at days 0 (before CSA treatment) and 14 posttreatment. PBMC were isolated and stored at –80°C as previously described (25).
Skin samples
Lesional (LS) and nonlesional (NL) skin punch biopsies were obtained from index plaques at baseline day 0 and from LS areas at days 0, 14, 42, and 56. A representative psoriasis plaque large enough to allow for four repeated biopsies was selected as a LS area.The location was chosen for ease of biopsy wound care, e.g., abdomen or thigh. The biopsies were stained with hematoxylin (Fisher) and eosin (Shandon) and purified mouse anti-human mAbs to keratin 16 (K16; Sigma-Aldrich), CD3, CD25, and CD83 (BD Biosciences) as described previously (25). Epidermal thickness measures were computed by using National Institutes of Health software (NIH image 6.1), and positive cells were counted manually through computer-assisted image analysis. Total RNA was isolated and gene expression for proinflammatory genes were measured as described below.
Microarray analysis
U95Av2-set GeneChip probe microarrays (Affymetrix) were used containing probe sets representing
12,000 genes. Fragmentation and array hybridization were conducted according to the manufacturers instructions (Affymetrix). Scanning and quality control, GeneChip expression value analysis, hierarchical clustering, and heat maps were performed as previously described (26).
The number of patients in each group was as follow: LS (n = 9), NL (n = 5), and day 14 posttreatment (n = 8). Similarly, mRNA from blood of four patients before and day 14 posttreatment was analyzed. The analysis was performed using Bioconductor packages for R (www.bioconductor.org). Expression values were obtained using the GCRMA algorithm. Genes were first filtered for overall intensity and evidence of variation across sample: genes where all the samples had intensity smaller than 3 (log 2 scale) and SD smaller than 0.15 were excluded from the analysis. A total of 7751 genes passed the filter.
Statistical analysis of microarray data
To assess differential expression of the groups of interest (LS vs NL and day 14 for the skin samples and day 14 vs baseline for blood samples) taking into account that samples came from the same patient, a linear mixed effect model was used considering condition (LS, NL, day 14) as a fixed factor and patient as random effect, which is also know as repeated measures ANOVA model. Model fitting and hypothesis testing were conducted using the limma package form Bioconductor. As proposed by Ref. 27 , limma uses an empirical Bayes method to moderate the SEs of the estimated contrasts which is particularly useful in microarray analysis where the number of replicates per condition is not high, resulting in more stable inference and improved power. For blood samples, this approach is the same as using the moderated paired t test. Contrasts were fitted and the moderated t test was used to assess differential expression. Values of p were adjusted controlling the false discovery rate (FDR) using the Benjamini-Hochberg approach. Finally, genes with a FDR <0.1 were declared differentially expressed.
Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of genes was performed using Euclidean distance and average linkage method, and is shown in a heat map graph (see Fig. 3). Complete lists of genes with description of relevant function of genes are provided in supplemental table I.4 Annotation was obtained using annotation package HGU95a version 2 1.14.0 built from Bioconductor.
Validation of expression changes in mRNA with real-time RT-PCR analysis
The expression of the following genes was tested in skin biopsies (n = 11): p19, p40, IFN-
, STAT1, IFN-regulatory factor 1 (IRF-1), monokine induced by IFN-
, CXCL9 (MIG), inducible NO synthase (iNOS), IL-8, myxovirus resistance 1, IFN-inducible protein p78 (Mx-1), keratin 16 (K16), IL-19, IL-1β, IL-17, IL-22, serine (or cysteine) proteinase inhibitor, member 3 (SERPINB3), granzyme B (GZMB), S100 calcium-binding protein A12 (S100A12), chemokine (CC motif) ligand 20 (MIP-3
), matrix metalloproteinase-12 (MMP12), defensin B2 (DEFB-2, DEFB4), and human acidic ribosomal protein (HARP). The expressions of IL-8, iNOS, IL-1β and MMP12 were also tested in mRNA isolated from blood (n = 10). The hARP gene, a housekeeping gene, was used to normalize each gene.
The primers and probes for these genes for the TaqMan RT-PCR assays were generated with the Primer Express algorithm, version 1.0, using published genetic sequences (National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI)-PubMed) for each gene. The primer sequences have been published for IL-23/p19/p40, IFN-
, STAT1, MIG, iNOS, IL-8, K16, and HARP (25), IP-10, MMP12, SERPINB3, DEFB-2, and GZMB (26). The primers sequence were as follows for: IP-10 forward: TCCACGTGTTGAGATCATTGC, IP-10 reverse: AATTCTTGATGGCCTTCGATTC, IP-10 probe: 6FAM-ACAATGAAAAAGAAGGGTGAGAAGAGATGTCTGAA-TAMARA (GenBank accession number NM_001009191; IRF-1 forward: TCCAGCACTGTCGCCATGT, IRF-1 reverse: GCACAACTTCCACTGGGATGT, IRF-1 probe: 6FAM-CTGTCAGCAGCACTCTCCCCGACTG-TAMARA (GenBank accession number NM_002198; IL-19 forward: CATGCAACTCTATTCCCAGCTACTT, IL-19 reverse: AGGTCAAAGCTGCAGTGAGCCATGATTG, IL-19 probe: 6FAM-GGGTGTCTCAATCTGGCACC-TAMARA (GenBank accession number AF276915); IL-1β forward: GCACGATGCACCTGTACGAT, IL-1β reverse: AGACATCACCAAGCTTTTTTGCT, IL-1β probe: 6FAM-CTGAACTGCACGCTCCGGGACTC-TAMRA (GenBank accession number NM_000576); S100A12 forward: TTGAAGAGCATCTGGAGGGAAT, S100A12 reverse: ACCCTTAGAGAGGGTGTCAAAATG, S100A12 probe: 6FAM- CAATATCTTCCACCAATACTCAGTTCGGAAGGG-TAMARA (GenBank accession number NM_005621); MIP-3
forward: GCTTTGATGTCAGTGCTGCTACTC, MIP-3
reverse: GTATCCAAGACAGCAGTCAAAGTTG, MIP-3
probe: 6FAM-TGCGGCGAATCAGAAGCAGCAA-TAMARA (GenBank accession number NM_004591. The primers and probes for IL-17 (assay ID Hs00174383_m1), MX-1 (assay ID Hs00182073_m1), IL-22 (Hs00220924_m1) were designed by Applied Biosystems. The RT-PCR was performed using EZ PCR Core Reagents (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturers directions and as previously described (25).
Statistical analysis of histology and real-time RT-PCR data
The repeated measures ANOVA model (28, 29) was used to evaluate the evolution in time of each gene and histological variable. The statistical mixed effect models include time as fixed effect and patient as random effect and was fitted using the mixed procedure available in SAS software.
Multivariate (µ-scores) analysis
To assess relative changes over time, the gene expression and phenotype data from days 0 (LS and NL) and x (14, 42, or 56) were transformed as (LSx – NL0)/(LS0 – NL0). T cell counts were transformed as LSx/LS0. Multivariate µ scores (46) were used to combine the changes of all genes belonging to a given pathway (Th.1, Th.17, Tip-DC, other).
Among the phenotype variables, epidermal thickness (ET) and psoriasis area of severity index (PASI) are related measures. Thus, short-term changes between days 0 and 14 in ET (ET, PASI, and K16) expression were combined into a comprehensive measure in a hierarchical fashion (indicated as parentheses in the formulae given above and in the figures and tables), to increase information content (to be published separately). For long-term changes, an additional level of hierarchy was added to combine the (ET, PASI, K16) profiles for days 14, 42, and 56.
For univariate data (gene expression), µ scores reduce to the well-known µ scores (Mann-Whitney) or, equivalently, to ranks (Wilcoxon). Genes related to disease remission were identified by computing Spearman-type correlation coefficients (using µ scores, instead of ranks) and related p values (based on the Gaussian distribution).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To assess the effect of CSA on disease activity, T cells and DCs in biopsies of NL and an index skin lesion were taken at baseline and after days 14, 42, and 56 of treatment. Both PASI and histologic remission were assessed to judge responses to CSA. Cryostat sections were analyzed for routine histopathology, epidermal thickness measurements, CD3+, CD25+ lymphocytes, CD83+ DCs counts and K16 expression (Fig. 1).
|
CSA administration down-regulates proinflammatory genes produced by "type 1," Th17 T cells and Tip-DCs in psoriatic skin lesions
To understand the effects of CSA on proinflammatory genes expressed in the skin lesions, we analyzed the gene expression in the skin biopsies collected during the clinical trial. We found that the major effect of CSA was in down-regulating gene expression at day 14 posttreatment. This inhibitory effect lasted during the course of treatment. We found many proinflammatory genes suppressed after treatment with CSA. We separated these genes into four categories that are described in Fig. 2. We detected major effects on genes of the "type 1" pathway (3) (Fig. 2A), the Th17 pathway (22) (Fig. 2B), genes produced by Tip-DCs (23) (Fig. 2C), and additional proinflammatory genes that can be ascribed to common cytokine effects of the above pathways.
|
, and the primary response genes STAT1, IRF1, IP-10, and MIG. The secondary response genes of activated "type 1" pathway that were affected by CSA included genes like IL-8 and Mx1 (Fig. 2A).
The genes of Th17 pathway which were down-regulated with CSA (Fig. 2B) include IL-23 subunit p19, IL-17, IL-22, and downstream genes such as MIP-3
, DEFB-2, IL-1β, SERPINB3, and S100A12 (12, 30, 31). Tip-DCs produce iNOS and TNF and these were both down-regulated with treatment (Fig. 2C). The effects of CSA were further detected on additional genes known to be up-regulated in psoriasis and regulated by IL-17, IFN-
, and TNF (Fig. 2D). These genes included K16, GZMB, MMP12, and IL-19.
To detect how CSA might be affecting gene expression in general, we tested expression of 12,000 genes using Affymetrix human U95Av2 gene chips at baseline skin (NL and LS skin biopsies and day 14 posttreatment) and blood (baseline and day 14 posttreatment). A heat map of genes with elevated expression in LS skin as compared with NL or day 14 posttreatment is shown (Fig. 3A). We identified 190 known genes that are down-regulated by CSA at day 14 posttreatment by 1.5-fold (p < 0.1 after correction). The list of genes with description of the function is available in supplemental table I. We detected genes such as S100A12, IL-1β, iNOS, GZMB, K16, SERPINB3, CXCL9 (MIG), IL-8, MMP12, and STAT1 with both microarray and real-time RT-PCR (Figs. 2 and 3).
|
In contrast to the effects of CSA on gene expression changes in skin at day 14, we did not detect any changes in peripheral blood circulating by day 14 posttreatment. Fig. 3A shows a heat map (on the left) of genes down-regulated after day 14 posttreatment in skin biopsies compared with LS skin. The heat map of gene array of RNA isolated from three patients on the right shows that there is no difference in expression (p > 0.05) of 12,000 genes expressed at baseline (day 0) and day 14 posttreatment. In accordance with the microarray analysis, our real-time RT-PCR analysis of RNA isolated from 10 patients shows lack of effect on proinflammatory genes like IL-8, IL-1β, iNOS, and MMP12 in blood samples at baseline (day 0) and day 14 posttreatment (Fig. 3B). Both analyses reveal no effect of CSA in blood as compared with skin biopsies.
Association of genes regulated by CSA with proinflammatory cells: identification of genes uniquely expressed in activated cells
We have recently created gene lists ("gene maps") that describe lineage characteristics of cells grown in vitro that include monocytes, DCs, T cells, fibroblasts, and keratinocytes (21). The gene maps also include genes that are expressed commonly in myeloid cells (monocytes, macrophages, and DCs) and such expressed in more than one leukocyte (myeloid cells and T cells). There are also genes that are expressed in multiple cells (leukocytes, fibroblasts, and keratinocytes) or are expressed in all cells (housekeeping). We have also listed genes that describe the activation genes after maturation of DCs; T cell genes after activation with anti-CD3/CD28 Ab or keratinocyte activation genes after stimulation with cytokines (TNF and IFN-
). As we detected several genes known to be regulated in the Th17 pathway, we have pointed these out with references from the known literature (supplemental table I).
To better understand the role of CSA on genes derived from proinflammatory cells known to be present in LS skin biopsies, we intercepted the genes down-regulated by CSA at day 14 with the lineage genes described in Table I. To our surprise, a large subset of these genes is present in myeloid derived cells. There were 54 genes associated with myeloid derived cells (monocytes, macrophages, and DC) compared with 11 genes associated with activated T cells (Table I, Lineage genes). As expected, there were a number of genes associated with keratinocytes and fibroblasts (51). We also classified 15 genes that were unique to T cell activation or cytokine (TNF, IFN-
, and IL-17) activation (Table I, Unique activation). These included genes such as LCN2, CXCL1, CXCL9, MMP12, and CXCL10 (bold in supplemental table I). We also detected a set of genes with known functions but not associated with a specific cell typed analyzed (not classified: Table I, Summary).
|
To characterize how expression of inflammatory mediators in Th1 (p40, IFN-
, STAT1, IRF1, MIG, IP-10, IL-8, Mx1), Th17 (p19, IL-17, IL-22, CCL20 (MIP-3
), DEFB-2 (DEFB4), IL-1β, SERPINB3, S100A12), and Tip-DC (iNOS, TNF
) pathways as well as additional genes like GZMB, MMP12, and IL-19 relate to psoriasis disease activity, µ scores of changes in mRNA levels between days 0 and 14 were compared with the short-term (day 14) and long-term (days 14, 42, 56) µ scores of phenotype changes (Fig. 4).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Compared with the TNF antagonist etanercept (33), cyclosporine appears to produce more rapid and quantitatively larger suppression of a variety of inflammatory gene products, so that it is tempting to relate the stronger/broader suppression of inflammatory gene activation by cyclosporine to its increased therapeutic activity compared with etanercept. However, at this juncture, comparable data for modulation of inflammatory gene sets (using array-based methods) are not available for more targeted biologic agents in psoriasis. Thus, the set of genes modulated in the skin by cyclosporine treatment of psoriasis will provide a "genomic signature" of successful treatment, and serve as a reference "anti-inflammatory" group for eventual comparison with more targeted inhibitors.
A major finding of our study is that in addition to specific leukocytes, CSA impacts on key inflammatory pathways. Within 2 wk of commencing treatment with cyclosporine, there was strong genomic inhibition of two pathways. First, Th1-type T cell activation was suppressed as shown by decreased STAT1, IFN-
, and several downstream genes regulated by IFN-
(3). Second, there was suppression of Th17 activation with decreased IL-17, IL-22, and downstream genes including DEFB-2, LCN2, CXCL1, and CCL20 (5, 6, 7, 11, 30, 31, 34). In vitro keratinocyte treatment with IL-17 and IL-22 led to induction of IL-1β, SA10012, and SERPINB3 (data not shown), and these genes were also decreased by CSA. We have also identified genes regulated by CSA that are specific products of IL-17-, TNF-, or IFN-
-activated cells, or T cells activated by TCR ligation (supplemental table I). Previous studies (35, 36) have identified suppression of "type 1" gene products during successful treatment of psoriasis with therapeutic agents. IL-17 and IL-17-induced gene products are only newly identified in psoriasis (12, 30). These data now show strong suppression of IL-17 (Th17) axis by CSA in psoriasis. This is further supported by the strong and significant correlation of Th17 pathways with disease remission. We believe the analysis of CSAs effect on suppression of Th1 vs Th17 inflammatory pathways is particularly important within a human inflammatory disease, because differences in activating stimuli for Th17 T cells have been identified in human vs mouse models (10, 12, 13, 37) and these differences could translate to differential effects of immunosuppressive agents on mouse vs human Th17 T cells.
Although the effects of CSA on T cells have long been appreciated, we detected a significant suppression of DC genes during treatment of psoriasis, from several perspectives. We have developed a set of lineage-specific genes of cutaneous cell types (21) and using these cell signatures, we found that the major effects of CSA were on myeloid-derived cells. DC maturation was strongly reduced (38), with reduced CD83 protein expression as well as multiple gene products associated with DC maturation. More specifically, CSA suppressed key inflammatory products of TIP-DCs, a newly recognized population of inflammatory DCs in psoriasis and increased frequency of skin cancers in transplant patients (23, 39). These CD11c+ myeloid-derived DCs produce inflammatory products including IL-20, IL-23, TNF, and NO (as a product of iNOS that is highly up-regulated in these cells) (23, 37, 40). CSA treatment of psoriasis decreased genomic expression of IL-23, TNF, and iNOS. The genes of the Tip-DC pathway correlated best with disease remission when the whole period of treatment was considered.
Products of Tip-DCs, such as IL-20, may be directly activating for epidermal keratinocytes (40). IL-19 and IL-20 gene expression are increased in psoriasis and have been shown to decrease with therapy (40, 41). CSA decreases IL-20-regulated genes such as IL-19, IL-8, CD83, and CXCL1, SPRR1B (40, 41). IL-23 appears to be a key activator of Th17 T cells and cytokine products of these cells (believed to be IL-17A and IL-22) have significant ability to stimulate keratinocyte hyperplasia and induce other inflammatory products in keratinocytes that typify psoriasis lesions (12). Hence, there is a growing body of evidence that IL-20 family cytokines, i.e., IL-19, IL-20, and IL-22, may be key pathogenic cytokines in psoriasis (30).
Our findings describe major effects of CSA on several signaling pathways of ILs, e.g., IL-1β, IL-12, IL-23, IL-20, IL-17, IL-22, CCL20, CXCL9 as well as IFN-
, and TNF, in myeloid-derived, skin resident and T cells. The role of Th1-induced chemokines like MIG in psoriasis may be to direct trafficking of T cell to psoriatic skin (42) and IFN-
is a probable inducer of >100 STAT1-regulated genes that are induced in psoriasis. Alternatively, Th17-chemokine like MIP3
(CCL20) (11) expressed in skin may direct migration of DC precursors to psoriasis lesions (43) and innate defense products induced by IL-17 and IL-22 are key contributors to psoriasis lesions. Thus, the complex mixture of cell types and expressed genes must be considered to be induced by inflammatory products synthesized by Tip-DCs, Th1, and Th17 T cells at a minimum (2, 3, 30, 37).
Interestingly, the gene expression changes in response to CSA at a relatively early time point are localized in skin rather than blood. Thus, it can be assumed that the therapeutic activity of the drug is in skin and further supports the assumption that psoriasis is a disease of immune modulation in the skin rather than circulating lymphocytes (4, 44, 45). To the extent that other inflammatory diseases have common inflammatory pathways expressed, this psoriasis response data may help to explain therapeutic activities in tissues, which are not accessible to biopsy analysis. Within the background of multiple types of leukocytes, complex genomic activation of inflammation in psoriasis lesions, and the interplay of innate acquired immune activation, we have revisited the pharmacologic actions of CSA and identified new pharmacologic actions of this widely used drug. An additional study from our laboratory reports reduced expression of IL-17 and IL-22 mRNA in psoriasis patients treated with cyclosporine as evidence that Th17 T cells are present and active in psoriasis lesions, but that study did not analyze genes that might be regulated by these cytokines in psoriasis lesions.
| Disclosures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health (NIH)/Clinical and Translational Science Award Grant UL1 RR024143. M.A.L. was supported by NIH Grant K23AR052404. L.C.Z. was supported by NIH Medical Science Training Program Grant GM07739. ![]()
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. James G. Krueger, Laboratory for Investigative Dermatology, Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10021-6399. E-mail address: jgk{at}mail.rockefeller.edu ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: DC, dendritic cell; CSA, cyclosporine A; iNOS, inducible NO synthase; Tip-DC, TNF- and iNOS-producing-DC; LS, lesional; NL, nonlesional; PASI, psoriasis area and severity index; ET, epidermal thickness. ![]()
4 The online version of this article contains supplemental material. ![]()
Received for publication August 13, 2007. Accepted for publication November 14, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, interleukin-2, and tumor necrosis factor-
, defining TC1 (cytotoxic T lymphocyte) and TH1 effector populations: a type 1 differentiation bias is also measured in circulating blood T cells in psoriatic patients. J. Invest. Dermatol. 113: 752-759. [Medline]
-induced genes in bone cells. J. Leukocyte Biol. 77: 388-399.
, and macrophage inflammatory protein-3
mRNA in patients with psoriasis vulgaris. J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Technolog. Med. Sci. 24: 294-296. [Medline]
/CCL20 and CC chemokine receptor 6 in psoriasis. J. Immunol. 164: 6621-6632.
and inducible nitric oxide synthase-expressing dendritic cells in psoriasis and reduction with efalizumab (anti-CD11a). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 19057-19062.
enhances keratinocyte proliferation in psoriasis and induces heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor. J. Invest. Dermatol. In press.
synergize in the enhancement of proinflammatory cytokine production by human keratinocytes. J. Invest. Dermatol. 111: 645-649. [Medline]
/CCL20 in human epidermis with impaired permeability barrier function. Exp. Dermatol. 11: 135-142. [Medline]This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Ortega, S. Fernandez-A, J. M. Carrillo, P. Romero, I. J. Molina, J. C. Moreno, and M. Santamaria IL-17-producing CD8+ T lymphocytes from psoriasis skin plaques are cytotoxic effector cells that secrete Th17-related cytokines J. Leukoc. Biol., August 1, 2009; 86(2): 435 - 443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. O. Nestle, D. H. Kaplan, and J. Barker Psoriasis N. Engl. J. Med., July 30, 2009; 361(5): 496 - 509. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. van der Fits, S. Mourits, J. S. A. Voerman, M. Kant, L. Boon, J. D. Laman, F. Cornelissen, A.-M. Mus, E. Florencia, E. P. Prens, et al. Imiquimod-Induced Psoriasis-Like Skin Inflammation in Mice Is Mediated via the IL-23/IL-17 Axis J. Immunol., May 1, 2009; 182(9): 5836 - 5845. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Kryczek, A. T. Bruce, J. E. Gudjonsson, A. Johnston, A. Aphale, L. Vatan, W. Szeliga, Y. Wang, Y. Liu, T. H. Welling, et al. Induction of IL-17+ T Cell Trafficking and Development by IFN-{gamma}: Mechanism and Pathological Relevance in Psoriasis J. Immunol., October 1, 2008; 181(7): 4733 - 4741. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |