|
|
||||||||





* Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710;
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709; and
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Strict regulation of innate immune function can affect the progression and outcome of several diseases, including bacterial pneumonia, chronic bronchitis, and environmental airways disease. Specific activation of innate immunity in the lung can be achieved by exposure to aerosolized bacterial endotoxin (22). Inhalation of bacterial endotoxin can contribute to the development and progression of occupational lung disease (23). Furthermore, inhaled LPS can modify allergic asthma (24, 25) and cause severe inflammatory disease in both humans and mice (26, 27, 28). Although this immediate inflammatory response plays an important role in host defense, uncontrolled inflammation can contribute to the progression of pulmonary (and systemic) disease (29). Accordingly, it is of considerable interest to identify environmental factors, which may modify innate immune responsiveness.
By focusing on the effect of ozone on innate immunity in the lung, we have found that ambient exposure to ozone can prime both local and systemic innate immune responsiveness by altering the cellular distribution of TLR4 and increased signaling by alveolar macrophages, leading to cellular apoptosis. These findings provide a biological mechanism for the epidemiological relationship between ozone and increased pulmonary morbidity and mortality.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Six- to 8-wk-old male C57BL/6J mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory. Experimental protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Duke University Medical Center and were conducted in accordance with the standards established by the U.S. Animal Welfare Acts.
Exposure protocol
Six- to 8-wk-old male C57BL/6J mice (The Jackson Laboratory) were exposed to either filtered air (FA) or ozone (2 parts per million (ppm) x 3 h), and then challenged with an aerosol of purified 0111:B4 Escherichia coli LPS (LPS; 4 µg/m3 x 2.5 h), as previously described (22). This dose of LPS models the inflammatory response experienced by grain mill workers during a typical 8-h workday (28, 30). All animals were evaluated 4 h after initiation of the LPS aerosol. The mean level of LPS measured in aerosol was 3.58 µg/m3 (2.19–4.96 µg/m3), and serum was 0.66 EU/ml (0.28–1.41 EU/ml) by the limulus amebocyte lysate assay (BioWhittaker). The level and duration of ozone exposure (2 ppm x 3 h) used in this protocol are an accepted murine model of ozone/oxidant injury in comparison with effective ambient exposure levels in humans. Level of ozone exposure for ex vivo analysis of macrophage function was 1 ppm x 3 h. Ozone or filtered air exposures were performed in 55-L Hinners-style exposure chambers for 3 h. Chamber air at 20–22°C and 50–60% relative humidity was supplied at a rate of 20 changes/hour. O3 was generated by directing 100% oxygen through a UV light ozone generator. Ozone concentration was monitored continuously within the chamber with an ozone UV light photometer (Dasibi model 1003AH; Dasibi). In vivo experiments represent 10 mice per group with at least two repeats.
Airway physiology
Direct measurements of respiratory mechanics in response to methacholine were made using the flexivent system (Scireq) and reported as total pulmonary resistance (RT) cmH2O/ml/s. Anesthesia was achieved with 60 mg/kg pentobarbital sodium injected i.p. and ventilated with a computer-controlled small animal ventilator (flexiVent; Scireq) with a tidal volume of 7.5 ml/kg and a positive end-expiratory pressure of 3 cm H2O. The mice were then given a neuromuscular blockade (0.8 ml/kg pancuronium bromide). Measurements of respiratory mechanics were made by the forced oscillation technique. Response to aerosolized methacholine (0, 10, 25, and 100 mg/ml) was determined by resistance measurements every 30 s for 5 min, ensuring the parameters calculated had peaked. Total lung capacity breaths were given after each dose, keeping the airways open and returning the measurements back to baseline. The resistance measurements were then averaged at each dose and graphed (RT cmH2O/ml/s) along with the initial baseline measurement.
Lung samples
Whole lung lavage and cell differentials were determined, as previously described (22). Luminex (Bio-Rad) was used to evaluate protein concentrations of keratinocyte cytokine, IL-6, MIP-1
, IL-10, IL-12(p70), and IL-17 with a commercially available immunoassay (Linco Research). Total protein concentrations in lung lavage fluid were determined using the Lowry assay (Bio-Rad).
Chemotaxis assays
Fresh polymorphonuclear cells (PMN) were harvested from either alveolar lavage or peripheral blood from animals exposed to either FA-LPS or ozone-LPS. First, live alveolar neutrophils were harvested from animals exposed to either FA-LPS or ozone-LPS. RBCs were removed with lysis buffer (0.14 M NH4Cl and 0.015 M Tris (pH 7.2)) for 5 min. A total of 1 x 105 cells suspended in RPMI 1640 with 10% FCS was placed in upper Transwell with 5 µm pore size (Costar). Cells were incubated in the presence of leukotriene B4 (LTB4; 30 µM) for 1 h at 37°C. Cells were collected from the lower well and stain for neutrophils (Gr-1+) and quantified by flow cytometry. Second, circulating neutrophils were isolated with Histopaque 1083, per manufacturers recommendations (Sigma-Aldrich), and analyzed for chemotaxis to LTB4. Third, lavage supernatants from pre-exposed animals were evaluated for chemotatic factors. A total of 1 x 106 zymosan-elicited peritoneal neutrophils was placed in the upper well, and then 600 µl of supernatants from either FA-LPS or ozone-LPS mice was used as chemoattractant. Neutrophils (Gr-1+) were quantified in lower well by flow cytometry.
Western blots
Lung tissues were homogenized and lysed in ice-cold lysis buffer containing 20 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 137 mM NaCl, 25 mM
-glycerolphosphate (pH 7.4), 2 mM PPiNa, 2 mM EDTA (pH 7.4), 1% Triton X-100, 10% glycerol, 1 mM PMSF, 5 µg/ml leupeptidin, 5 µg/ml pepstatin, 5 µg/ml aprotinin, 1mM Na3VO4, and 1 mM DTT. After centrifugation, tissue extracts were resolved by SDS-PAGE and were analyzed by immunoblot. The membranes were probed with Abs to phospho-JNK, phospho-p38MAPK, phospho-ERK, cleaved caspase-3, and
-actin as loading control (Cell Signaling Technology). Blots were developed with ECL plus (Amersham Biosciences).
Apoptosis
Fresh lung alveolar cells were pooled from five animals (5 x 105 fresh cells) for each group and were analyzed. Fresh whole blood was drawn from the inferior vena and pooled from five animals (1 x 106 fresh cells) for each group. After blocking with Fc block (BD Biosciences), murine IgG, and rat IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories), cells were stained with mAbs, including the following: F4/80-allophycocyanin (Serotec), Gr1-FITC (BD Biosciences), 7-aminoactinomycin D, and annexin V-PE (BD Biosciences). Analysis was performed using FACSVantage SE (BD Biosciences), and counts were calculated automatically by FlowJo software (Tree Star). For the TUNEL assay (DeadEnd Colorimetric TUNEL System; Promega), paraffin-embedded sections were deparaffinized by immersing slides in xylene and then through graded ethanol washes (100, 95, 85, 70, 60, and 50%), followed by a wash in 1x PBS. The tissue sections were then fixed by immersing the slides in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min. A proteinase K solution of 20 µg/ml was placed on the slides for 22 min to help permeabilize the tissue. The slides were then washed with 1x PBS and refixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for another 5 min and washed again. In situ nick end labeling of nuclear DNA fragmentation was performed in a humid chamber for 1 h in the dark at 37°C. A positive control slide was prepared by treating the tissue sections with RNase-free DNase for 10 min before the above labeling. A negative control slide was prepared by omitting the rTdT from the above labeling step. The labeling reaction was stopped by immersing the slides in 2x SSC for 15 min, followed by a 1x PBS wash. Endogenous peroxidases were blocked by immersing the slides in 0.3% hydrogen peroxide in PBS for 5 min and then washing with 1x PBS. Color was developed by diaminobenzidine. The slides were then mounted with Permount mounting medium (Fisher Scientific) and observed under a light microscope.
TLR4 immunohistology and flow cytometry
Whole lung lavage was performed to obtain three pools of two animals 24 h after exposure to ozone or FA. After blocking for 10 min on ice with Fc block, murine IgG, and rat IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories), live lavage cells were stained for surface expression of F4/80 (Serotec) and TLR4 for 30 min and washed. Alveolar macrophages were identified as F4/80+. Surface expression of TLR4 was determined using PE-conjugated mAbs to TLR4 (clone UT41; eBioscience). Cells were fixed with 1% ultrapure paraformaldehyde (Polysciences); flow cytometry analysis was performed using BD Biosciences LSR II flow cytometer; and data were analyzed with BD FACSDiva software (BD Biosciences). A laser-scanning confocal microscope (LSM 510 UV mounted on Axiovert 200M microscope; Zeiss) was used to obtain the fluorescence and differential interference contrast images. The images were obtained simultaneously using the 488- and 543-nm lasers as the light source, and the Zeiss Plan-Apo x63 oil N.A. = 1.4 as objective lens. For fluorescence, either a 505- to 550-nm or a long pass 560-nm filter was used for the emission, with a pinhole of 1 Airy unit, corresponding to a z-resolution of 0.8 µm. The software used for acquisition was Zeiss LSM510 version 3, and for analysis, LSM Image Examiner version 3.2.
Statistics
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Significant differences between groups were identified by ANOVA. Individual comparisons between groups were confirmed by Students t test, unless otherwise stated. Statistical calculations were performed using SPSS. A two-tailed p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To determine whether ozone could modify the innate immune response to LPS, we primarily exposed mice to either filtered air or inhaled ozone for 3 h (2 ppm), followed by secondary exposure to either saline or inhaled LPS at 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, or 7 days. All experiments follow the same experimental protocol for coexposures. Previously, both ozone and LPS inhalation have independently been shown to cause airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) to inhaled methacholine. Ozone exposure alone caused enhanced AHR at early time points (24 and 48 h), and this response peaked at 24 h and returned to baseline by 72 h. However, 48 and 72 h after ozone exposure, the airway response to inhaled LPS was synergistically enhanced over the AHR observed following either exposure alone (Fig. 1). By 7 days after ozone exposure, the physiologic response to LPS was independent of ozone pre-exposure (data not presented). This observation suggests that the effects of ozone-priming response to LPS have, in part, resolved by 7 days after exposure. Therefore, ozone can enhance LPS-induced airway hyperreactivity to methacholine up to 72 h after exposure.
|
To determine whether ozone priming of the LPS response in the airways was dependent on cellular inflammation, we characterized recruitment of cells into the alveolar compartment after exposure. Unexpectedly, we observed significantly reduced LPS-induced pulmonary inflammation at both 24 and 48 h after pre-exposure to ozone (Fig. 2). We have previously demonstrated that mice develop airways hyperresponsiveness after inhalation of ozone (22). Because it was conceivable that enhanced ozone-induced bronchoconstriction could minimize the effects of inhaled LPS by reducing the deposition and distribution of the aerosol, we challenged animals pre-exposed to FA or ozone to doses of LPS similar to aerosol by oropharyngeal aspiration (1.7 µg/50 µl saline). LPS delivered to the airways in this manner is largely independent of ozone-induced changes in air flow. The differences we observed in response between the groups using this method were identical with those using aerosolized LPS. Importantly, reduced concentrations of total cells (ozone-LPS, 6.1 x 104 vs FA-LPS, 16.5 x 104), macrophages (ozone-LPS, 1.0 x 104 vs FA-LPS, 1.7 x 104), and neutrophils (ozone-LPS, 5.0 x 104 vs FA-LPS, 14.7 x 104) persisted with this method of LPS administration. Therefore, we conclude that ozone pre-exposure can attenuate cellular inflammation in the lungs in response to aerosolized LPS independent of changes in airway hyperresponsiveness.
|
Although reductions in inflammatory cells in the lung caused by sequential exposure to ozone and LPS could have been explained by reduced production/release of cytokines and chemokines in the lower airway, this was not observed. In contrast, we found dramatic increases in the concentration of several proinflammatory proteins after pre-exposure to ozone, including the following: KC, MIP-1
, and IL-6 (Fig. 3). Minimal, but significant increases in IL-10, IL-12(p70), and IL-17 were also seen with ozone pre-exposure at 24, 48, and 72 h (data not shown). TNF-
was significantly increased after ozone pre-exposure only at 72 h (1811 ± 459 vs 3614 pg/ml ± 521, p < 0.05). To specifically address whether any undetected secreted factors contribute to altered cellular migration, we harvested zymosan-elicited peritoneal neutrophils from naive animals. No significant differences were observed in the chemotactic response to lavage fluid obtained from ozone vs FA pre-exposed mice to explain an absolute reduction in recruitment of inflammatory cells (chemotaxis index; FA-LPS, 5.8 vs ozone-LPS, 6.7). This further suggests that alteration in secreted factors in the alveolus did not significantly contribute to reduced cell populations in the lung associated with ozone pre-exposure.
|
|
Reduced LPS-induced inflammatory cell recruitment into the lungs associated with ozone pre-exposure could be the result of either impaired cellular motility or enhanced cell death. To determine whether ozone directly impaired cellular migration, we harvested lung neutrophils from animals exposed to inhaled LPS with or without ozone pre-exposure. Cells were then analyzed for their migratory potential using Transwells (31). In the absence of any chemotactic signal, there was a 7.2-fold decrease in nonspecific migration (chemokinesis) in ozone-treated cells compared with those exposed to FA (data not shown). When a chemotactic gradient was added (LTB4), similar increases in PMN migration from each of these groups were observed (chemotaxis index; FA-LPS, 1.5 vs ozone-LPS, 2.8). However, the absolute number of ozone-treated cells that migrated toward LTB4 was reduced. Thus, a reduction in spontaneous neutrophil cytokinesis after ozone exposure resulted in an absolute reduction in the number of PMNs that migrated to LTB4. This observation suggested that mice pre-exposed to ozone had a population of PMNs that were functionally unable to migrate to chemotactic stimulus.
To determine why subset of neutrophils demonstrated reduced spontaneous cytokinesis and to better understand the reduced numbers of macrophages recruited into the lung associated with pre-exposure to ozone, we explored the possibility that ozone exposure was inducing apoptosis or necrosis of inflammatory cells. To address this question, we performed flow analysis to discriminate populations of inflammatory cells in the lower airway and circulating blood 24 h after pre-exposure to ozone that might be undergoing cell death. Neutrophils recruited into the lung after inhaled LPS demonstrated a 40% increase in apoptosis when pre-exposed to inhaled ozone (ozone, 4.2%; LPS, 3.6%; ozone-LPS, 6.0%). Interestingly, ozone exposure by itself had a profound effect on macrophages. We found that ozone alone can induce apoptosis in alveolar macrophages (FA, 7.8% vs ozone, 27%), whereas inhaled LPS alone did not have a measurable impact on macrophage apoptosis at this time point (FA, 7.8% vs FA-LPS, 8.0%) (Fig. 5A). Mice were phenotyped at an early time point after exposure to LPS, which most likely explains the lack of LPS-induced apoptosis observed. However, LPS exposure in the context of ozone pre-exposure substantially increased the percentage of macrophages in the lung undergoing apoptosis (ozone, 27% vs ozone-LPS, 51%). Ozone-induced apoptosis of airway inflammatory cells in the lung was confirmed by TUNEL staining (Fig. 6) and an increase in cleaved caspase 3 (Figs. 7E and 8E). Secondary necrosis was observed after either ozone or LPS exposure (FA, 29.9%; ozone, 40.8%; FA-LPS, 35.6%; ozone-LPS, 26%). To determine whether the effects of ozone were limited to the lung, we examined apoptosis in leukocytes isolated from whole blood from animals in each of these groups. No significant difference in systemic neutrophil apoptosis was detected. However, ozone pre-exposure increased the concentration of apoptotic monocytes in the systemic circulation after exposure to LPS (FA, 3.8%; ozone, 4.6%; FA-LPS, 2.8%; ozone-LPS, 22.8%) (Fig. 5B). These data demonstrate that ozone pre-exposure not only enhanced apoptosis in leukocytes recruited to the lung in response to inhaled LPS, but also circulating monocytes, which might be involved systemically in enhancing and sustaining the initial inflammatory response.
|
|
|
|
To determine whether ozone initiates intracellular signaling through innate immune pathways, we investigated the individual and combined effects of ozone and LPS on downstream signaling in whole lung homogenates. Ozone alone transiently increased total IL-1R-associated kinase-M (data not shown), as well as phosphorylation of JNK, ERK, and p38 4 h after exposure (Fig. 8). This increase was statistically significant for p38. However, the enhanced signal associated with acute ozone exposure returned to baseline by 24 h after exposure. All proteins were significantly higher in mice exposed to either FA + LPS or O3 + LPS, when compared with mice exposed to either FA or O3 (p < 0.05; Mann-Whitney U test). Mice pre-exposed to ozone showed enhanced phospho-JNK, phospho-ERK, and phospho-p38 immunoreactivity, when compared with either exposure alone at the 24-h time point (Fig. 7). We did not observe ozone-dependent differences in TLR4 protein expression or in mRNA expression of known negative regulators of TLR4 signaling, including IRAK-M, A20, or tollip at this time point (data not shown).
Ozone exposure modifies the cellular distribution of TLR4
We did not observe differences in either mRNA or protein expression of TLR4 at 24 h after exposure to ozone that would explain ozone-induced enhanced TLR4 signaling (data not shown). For that reason, we considered that the spatial distribution of this receptor might account for the enhanced TLR4 signaling. In fact, 24 h after exposure to ozone, we observe increased intensity and altered distribution of TLR4 on alveolar macrophages by fluorescent microscopy (data not shown). Alveolar macrophages were identified by confocal microscopy (F4/80+) and demonstrate robust enhanced expression of TLR4 after exposure to ozone (Fig. 9, A–F). This was quantified by a shift in the percentage of alveolar macrophages that express a high concentration of TLR4 as detected by flow cytometry and a shift in the median fluorescent intensity (Fig. 9, G and H). Moreover, confocal microscopy images indicate that inhaled ozone results in altered special distribution of TLR4 on alveolar macrophages. These observations suggest that enhanced TLR4 signaling is related to trafficking of TLR4 within alveolar macrophages in response to inhaled ozone.
|
Ozone enhanced LPS-induced production of proinflammatory cytokines in the whole lung, increased apoptosis of alveolar macrophages, and was associated with redistribution of TLR4 on alveolar macrophages. To specifically determine whether exposure to ozone modified the functional response of alveolar macrophages to LPS, we isolated lung macrophages from ozone-exposed animals by density centrifugation. These cells were subsequently challenged to LPS in vitro, and levels of TNF-
from the supernatant were measured. Pre-exposure to ozone does prime the innate immune response to endotoxin under these conditions (Fig. 10). This observation further supports the association between ozone-induced altered distribution of cellular TLR4 and enhanced biological response to LPS.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It has long been appreciated that strict control of the biologic response to bacterial toxins is critical to host survival. This is highlighted by the fact that TLR4-deficient animals are protected against LPS-induced shock (32), yet are vulnerable to overwhelming live Gram-negative infections (33). Although it is essential to recognize, respond to, and clear pathogens, enhanced (acute or persistent) response to microorganisms can also lead to detrimental effects. In this study, we have demonstrated that ozone can substantially affect the response to LPS by priming the innate immune system through TLR4 cell surface expression. These findings are entirely consistent with the observed effect of ozone on decreased clearance of live bacterial pathogens (12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21). Moreover, these findings provide a biological hypothesis for the epidemiological relationship between ozone and increased pulmonary morbidity and mortality. Loss of lung function in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is related to exposure to environmental air pollutants (34, 35) and frequency of exacerbations (36). Our observations support that exposure to ozone can significantly enhance both lung injury and macrophage apoptosis after exposure to inhaled endotoxin. These findings suggest that ozone priming of response to inhaled endotoxin could contribute to both loss of lung function and defective antibacterial host defense.
Our results demonstrate that inhaled ozone can alter the spatial distribution of TLR4 and results in an enhanced response to LPS. This observation is consistent with previous in vitro observations, which demonstrate after stimulation trafficking of TLRs to the surface membrane of HEK293 cells (37). Recent observations in a model of hemorrhagic shock demonstrate that H2O2 can induce surface expression of TLR4 on monocytic cells (38). Furthermore, previous studies using transgenic animals demonstrate that the level of TLR4 RNA expression correlates with biologic function, suggesting a dose effect dependent on TLR4 expression (39). Our in vivo observations clearly demonstrate the pathophysiologic importance of exposure to inhaled environmental air pollutants and support that exposure to ambient ozone may have a profound effect on innate immune responsiveness. However, it remains possible that other members of the receptor complex or downstream adaptor molecules could also be altered by inhaled ozone. For example, an increase in soluble CD14 after exposure to ozone has been observed in an experimental study in humans (40). CD14, a critical component of the TLR4 complex, can either enhance the biologic response to LPS or act as a sink attenuating this response. Improved understanding of the environmental factors that can regulate TLR4-dependent signaling will improve our understanding of host defense.
Precise regulation of TLR-dependent signal is required to optimize normal inflammation and resolution of injury. Although inhaled ozone activates many proinflammatory pathways, we found that it also accelerates apoptosis. Thus, enhanced apoptosis may serve to regulate uncontrolled innate immune response. It remains plausible that this is a protective mechanism, in that robust monocyte and neutrophil recruitment, in the absence of apoptosis, could magnify the severity of lung damage. Attenuated inflammatory cell recruitment after a severe oxidative lung injury could prove protective. We speculate that in the absence of macrophage apoptosis, there might have been even higher levels of proinflammatory cytokines, neutrophil recruitment, and lung injury. In fact, ozone-induced apoptosis could also explain how pre-exposure to ozone can be protective with influenza infection (41), a disease in which acute morbidity is associated with an uncontrolled inflammatory response. In contrast, recent work supports that low-level TLR4 signaling appears protective in other forms of oxidative lung injury (42, 43, 44). Combined, these observations support divergent mechanisms of strict regulation of innate immune response to limit oxidative lung injury dependent on the level of activation.
It is noteworthy to highlight that the physiologic response of the airways was independent of the concentration of inflammatory cells. However, secreted cytokines/chemokines were clearly up-regulated with coexposure, as are other markers of lung injury. Many factors, including the cytokines IL-1
(45), TNF-
(46, 47, 48), and IL-6 (49), have been associated with ozone-related AHR. In our model of coexposure, IL-6 was dramatically increased in both the lavage fluid and serum at all time points tested. Although it remains unclear whether this specific cytokine accounts for the differences in TLR4-dependent AHR, this study further supports the dichotomy between cellular inflammation and AHR. Further studies are needed to identify the pathogenesis of airway hyperresponsiveness, which remains a hallmark of asthma.
Ozone is a common urban air pollutant that significantly contributes to increased pulmonary morbidity and mortality, especially among those with chronic lung disease (1, 2, 3, 4). We have demonstrated that ozone can prime the biologic response to inhaled LPS, leading to enhanced airway injury and apoptosis of inflammatory cells in the lung. TLR4-dependent signaling in the lung appears to be a double-edged sword. A controlled response is critical for effective clearance of bacterial pathogens. However, an exaggerated response can be associated with an increase in airway hyperresponsiveness, airway injury, and reduced numbers of functional inflammatory cells. If we are to gain a better understanding of disease etiology and pathogenesis, we need a more detailed understanding of the complex interaction between common environmental exposures and fundamental homeostatic mechanisms that regulate innate immunity.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Disclosures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 This work was supported by the National Institute on Environmental Health Services (ES12717, ES11961), the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI58161), and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL91335). This work was also supported, in part, by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health, the National Institute on Environmental Health Sciences, and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. ![]()
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. John W. Hollingsworth, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3136, Durham, NC 27710. E-mail address: holli017{at}mc.duke.edu ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; AHR, airway hyperresponsiveness; FA, filtered air; LTB4, leukotriene B4; PMN, polymorphonuclear cell; ppm, parts per million. ![]()
Received for publication April 2, 2007. Accepted for publication July 18, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-arrestin2- and GRK6-deficient mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 7478-7483.
receptors. Am. J. Physiol. 280: L537-L546.
polymorphisms and ozone-induced change in lung function. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 171: 171-176. This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Sandikci, K. Seyrek, H. Aksit, and H. Kose Inhalation of formaldehyde and xylene induces apoptotic cell death in the lung tissue Toxicology and Industrial Health, August 1, 2009; 25(7): 455 - 461. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |