|
|
||||||||


* Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U 764, Université Paris XI, Laboratoire dHématologie, Service de Médecine Interne-Immunologie, Hôpital Antoine Beclère, Clamart, France;
Laboratoire dOnco-Hématologie, Commissariat à lEnergie Atomique/Direction des Sciences du Vivant, Fontenay aux Roses, France; and
Service dHématologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpetrière, Paris, France
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B (RELB, BCL3), Wnt, TGF
, VEGF, MAPKs, Stats, cytokines, chemokines (IL-10, IL-10R, IL-2R, CCL-3, CCL-4, and CCR7), TLR-9, and the surface Ags CD52, CD54, CD70, and CD72. Most of these gene groups are strongly expressed in CLL B cells as compared with normal B cells. Unexpectedly, metabolic pathways, namely cholesterol synthesis and adipogenesis, are also enhanced by CD5. Conversely, CD5 inhibited genes involved in RNA splicing and processing, ribosome biogenesis, proteasome, and CD80 and CD86 Ags, whose expression is low in CLL. Comparison of CD5- vs tailless CD5-transfected cells further demonstrated the role of CD5 phosphorylation in the regulation of selected genes. These results support a model where CLL cells are chronically stimulated, leading to CD5 activation and cell survival. In addition to CD5 itself, we point to several CD5-induced genes as potential therapeutic targets. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The origin and nature of CLL cells are undetermined; however, there are strong arguments to suspect that they have been selected by a common Ag as suggested by surface markers and the biased, restricted repertoire of their BCR genes (7, 8). Many BCRs are indeed autoreactive in CLL (9) or directed against carbohydrates (10). Thus, it is likely that B-CLL cells are chronically activated in vivo inasmuch as their CD5+IgMlow phenotype is reminiscent of autoreactive B cells in a double transgenic (hen egg lysozyme/anti-hen egg lysozyme) mouse model (11) in which CD5 is up-regulated on B cells by chronic BCR stimulation and is needed to maintain B cell anergy to auto-Ags.
Although CD5 is constitutively expressed on B1a B cells (12), it can be induced on conventional B cells either by chronic Ag stimulation in vivo as mentioned above or by in vitro stimulation with anti-IgM and a soluble CD40 ligand (13).
Following expression at the cell surface, CD5 exerts a negative feedback on BCR signaling as shown by reduced proliferating capacity and inhibition of an intracellular Ca2+ peak following BCR stimulation (13, 14, 15). We have indeed observed that CD5+ human blood B cells display a low Ca2+ response in comparison to their CD5– counterparts (13). Interestingly, CLL cells have long been described as anergic to BCR stimulation (16), this feature being prominent in Ig-mutated CLL cases (17).
Although considered to be a negative regulator of BCR signaling, we demonstrated that CD5 directly augmented IL-10 production in B cells (13) in agreement with the previously observed IL-10 production in long-lived murine B1a cells (12), human CD5+ B cells (18), and CLL (19). We therefore speculated that several of the above-mentioned features of CLL could be related to CD5 expression and/or phosphorylation. The implications of this finding are obvious, because attempts to induce B cell apoptosis by CD5 ligation were successful in few CLL cases (20).
To exert its negative regulation on BCR-mediated early events, CD5 must be brought to the BCR vicinity and phosphorylated on tyrosines in its cytoplasmic domain (14, 15). We found that CD5 was naturally phosphorylated on tyrosines in all CLL samples studied, indicating that this may reflect chronic activation in vivo. In parallel, we observed that CD5 was phosphorylated upon introduction into Daudi B cells (13), suggesting that these cell lines could be of value to study the effects of CD5 signaling on gene regulation. We compared the expression profiles of empty vector (CD5–) and CD5+ Daudi B cells by means of DNA microarrays and found that several gene families already known to be activated in CLL were induced by CD5 in Daudi B cells, suggesting that some prominent features of CLL are downstream effects of CD5 signaling. Unexpectedly, several gene families such as those involved in cholesterol synthesis were induced by CD5, whereas genes involved in RNA splicing and export from the nucleus were inhibited. Comparison of these data to microarrays generated from CLL or normal B cells revealed a CD5 signature in CLL, a finding with potential biological and clinical implications.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The patients enrolled in the study were diagnosed according to cytologic and immunologic analyses and followed up at the Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (Paris, France) and Antoine Beclère Hospital (Clamart, France) between 1998 and 2006. The treatment (if any)-free period was at least 3 mo. Approval for these studies was obtained from the institutional review boards of the Commissariat à lEnergie Atomique and the University Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière in Paris, France. Among the six patients studied (Fig. 3b), four had mutated, one had unmutated, and one had undetermined IgV genes. All patients gave informed consent. B lymphocytes from leukemic and normal benevolent donors were purified and maintained in culture as previously described (21). For B cell purification a negative B cell selection was applied using a "B cell enrichment" RosetteSep kit (Stem Cell Technologies). The mean purity of B cells was 96% in donors and 92.5% (89.5% to 98%) in patients.
|
TL1 and TL4 mutants were amplified from full-length CD5 cDNA using a 5' primer, GCCTCGAGATGCCCATGGGGTCTCTGCAA, and a 3' primer, GCGGCCGCCTACTTGTAGGCAAGGGGGCC (TL1) or GCGGCCGCTTACAGAGCTGGATAAGCTGACA (TL4), and inserted into a pNT plasmid at the XhoI and NotI sites.
CD5 deleted from the 16-aa region encompassing Y429 and Y441 was cloned into pNT as described (15). Transfected Daudi cell lines were thawed and propagated in RPMI 1640 and 10% FCS with 0.8 mg/ml geneticin for several days and stained with anti-CD5-PE mAb (Beckman Coulter) to assess cell homogeneity. Cells were washed and cultured thereafter without geneticin for 3 days and RNA was extracted.
Hybridization on DNA microarrays
RNA was extracted using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen) and RNA integrity was assessed by using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. cRNA was prepared according to the manufacturers "one-cycle target labeling" protocol starting from 5 µg of total RNA and hybridized to HG-U133 Plus 2.0 GeneChip oligonucleotide arrays (Affymetrix). HG-U133 Plus 2.0 arrays contain 54,675 sets of oligonucleotide probes that correspond to roughly 39,000 unique human genes. Primary image analysis of the arrays was performed using GeneChip operating software 1.2 (Affymetrix), resulting in a single raw value for each probe ("signal"). Data from each different array experiment were scaled to a target value of 100 by GeneChip operating software 1.2 using the "global scaling" method. A comparison between empty vector and CD5-transfected cell samples was performed with the GeneChip operating software 1.2. Only genes found to be present in both pNT and pNT-CD5 cell lines with a "change" labeled as significantly decreased or increased and with a ratio under 0.67 or above 1.5, respectively, were retained. p < 0.05 was considered significant.
Data analysis
Comparative analysis was performed for each gene or expressed sequence tag and for each microarray separately. The first comparison value was "pairs in average," meaning the number of probe pairs used in the computation of "average difference" and "log average." Average difference means an intensity difference (perfect match (PM) signal/mismatch (MM) signal) for each probe pair used, which was calculated by subtracting the intensity of the MM from the intensity of the PM. "Absolute call" can be expressed as present, absent, or marginal. "Increase" means the number of probe pairs for each gene for which PM – MM is significantly greater in the experimental data (exp) than in the baseline (base) data; to be considered significant, two conditions must be met, the first being (PM – MM)exp – (PM – MM)base
change threshold (CT) and the second being ((PM – MM)exp – (PM-MM)base)/(PM-MM)base
percentage change threshold (PCT).
Similarly, "decrease" means the number of probe pairs for each gene, for which PM – MM is significantly greater in the baseline data than in the experimental data. "Difference call" can result in five possible outcomes indicating that the level of expression of a mRNA is decreased, increased, marginally increased, marginally decreased, or without significant changes.
Both the Affymetrix average difference expression data and the present/absent calls were used in the analyses. Data analysis was conducted using Affymetrix GeneChip operating software 1.2 with a MAS 5.0 statistical algorithm (Affymetrix; more detail about the Affymetrix image analysis algorithms is available at www.affymetrix.com/products/software/specific/gcos.affx). Unsupervised clustering by sample and gene dimensions by hierarchical clustering was based on the Pearson correlation and the complete linkage group aggregation technique using TIGR MeV 4.0 software (22). Data on two wild-type Daudi cell lines (Fig. 3a) were generated by Affymetrix technology and obtained from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) DataSet (reference identifiers GSM18895 and GSM18896).
Gene Ontology analysis and analysis of biological pathways
The FatiGO (23) web interface carries out data mining using Gene Ontology database (www.geneontology.org) for DNA microarray data. The grouping of genes by functional classes and pathways provides insight that is simply not possible by looking at particular gene lists. The data mining consists of the assignation of the most characteristic Gene Ontology term to each cluster. FatiGO implements Fishers exact test for 2 x 2 contingency tables by comparing two groups of genes and extracting a list of Gene Ontology terms distributed among the groups that are significantly different. The results of the test are corrected for multiple testing to obtain an adjusted p value. The use of FatiGO help us to characterize each cluster by the significant pathways and Gene Ontology terms identified by FatiGO and also to investigate the most strongly regulated genes within each cluster.
Gene Microarray Pathway Profiler (GenMAPP) is a program for viewing and analyzing microarray data on microarray pathway profiles (MAPPs) representing biological pathways or any other functional grouping of genes (24). When a MAPP is linked to a gene-expression data set, GenMAPP automatically and dynamically color codes the genes on the MAPP according to criteria supplied by the user. GenMAPP was used to construct and modify pathways as well as to provide access to annotation for genes and a connection with a pathway using information available from the Gene Ontology Consortium (www.geneontology.org).
Real-time PCR
Cells (2 x 106/ml) were incubated in complete medium for 24 h under various conditions, and RNA was purified using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). Reverse transcription was done with random hexamers using the SuperScript first-strand synthesis system for RT-PCR (Invitrogen Life Technologies). Transcript expression was analyzed by PCR using the TaqMan technology as described (25). Results were analyzed using the ABI Prism 7700 sequence detection system software (PE Applied Bio System). Each reaction was normalized by the cycle threshold (Ct) of GAPDH cDNA expression. Relative expression was calculated by measuring the difference of normalized Ct between condition A vs condition B and applying the following formula: difference of expression between A and B = 2e – (CtA – CtB). The following TaqMan specific primers and probes (Proligo) were selected using Primer Express Software and specificity verified using NCBI Blast software. Probes are 5' FAM and 3' TAMRA dually labeled.
The primer sequences are as follows: SC4MOL (amplicon size 146), 5'-AAGATGCTTTGGTTGTGCAG-3' (L1), 5'-GATGTGCATATTCAG CTTCCA-3' (R1), and 5'-TTCCAAATGGAGCCTGAAACTCATGA-3' (P1); MVK (amplicon size 75), 5'-ACCAAAGTCCCTCGCAATAC-3' (L1), 5'-CACGATCTCTGGGAACTTGA-3' (R1), and 5'-TCTGACGCCAGCCACAAGGG-3' (P1); UBE2D1 (amplicon size 146), 5'-CCACCAAAGATTGCTTTCAC-3' (L1), 5'-TCACAAAGTAGAGAACATATGGACAA-3' (R1), and 5'-TTCTGAGGTCACAATGGTCACCAGC-3' (P1); SMD3 (amplicon size 107), 5'-TCAGCCTAGATGAGCGAATTT-3' (L1), 5'-TTCCACATCTCCCAAGATCA-3' (R1), and 5'-TCTGCCTCGAAGCTCTCGGTCA-3' (P1); LSM3 (amplicon size 133), 5'-TGTCTATTGGTGTGCCGATT-3' (L1), 5'-TTGGACATCTGGCAGTTCAT-3' (R1), and 5'-ACAATGTGGCCCTCGGCCTC-3' (P1); CD86 (amplicon size 121), 5'-CTCTTTGTGATGGCCTTCCT-3' (L1), 5'-AGCTCACTCAGGCTTTGGTT-3' (R1), and 5'-CTGCAGACCTGCCATGCCAA-3' (P1); CCL3 (amplicon size 81), 5'-CTGCTCAGAATCATGCAGGT-3' (L1); 5'-ATGCAGAGAACTGGTTGCAG-3' (R1), and 5'-TGCTGCCCTT GCTGTCCTCC-3' (P1).
Immunoprecipitation and Western blotting
CLL cells were processed from fresh blood and washed at room temperature in serum-free RPMI 1640 with 10 mM HEPES. CLL and Daudi cells were stimulated or not stimulated with 2 µg/ml rabbit polyclonal F(ab')2 anti-IgM (BD Pharmingen) for 5 min and lysed. Cells (10 x 106 Daudi, or 15 x 106 CLL) were lysed at 4°C for 30 min in lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 140 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 50 U/ml aprotinin, 1 mM PMSF, and 1 mM sodium orthovanadate) containing 1% Nonidet-P-40 detergent. Lysates were precipitated with 1 µg of the 0490D anti-CD5 mAb (26) plus protein G-Sepharose beads (Sigma-Aldrich). Proteins were separated by electrophoresis on SDS-polyacrylamide gels, electrotransferred onto PVDF membranes (Amersham Biosciences), and blotted with polyclonal rabbit anti-phospho-serine Ab (Zymed Laboratories), anti-phosphotyrosine 4G10 mAb (Upstate Biotechnology), or anti-CD5 UCH-T2 mAb (catalog no. sc-1180; Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Blots were revealed using a goat anti-mouse or goat anti-rabbit HRP-conjugated Ab (Bio-Rad) and ECL detection (Amersham Biosciences). For tailless CD5 precipitation, rabbit polyclonal anti-CD5 (H-300; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was used and revealed with anti-phosphotyrosine 4G10 mAb or with UCH-T2 anti-CD5 mAb. Membranes were saturated with 3% gelatin (Sigma-Aldrich) for phosphoserine detection; otherwise, membranes were saturated with 3% powdered milk.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CD5 phosphorylation status was investigated in fresh ex vivo CLL samples and in Daudi B cells permanently transfected with CD5 or with vector by means of CD5 immunoprecipitation followed by Western blotting with an anti-phosphotyrosine mAb. We found that CD5 was naturally phosphorylated in untreated, Binet stage A patients as shown from three representative CLL samples (Fig. 1a). CD5 phosphorylation was also observed on seven other CLL samples with stage A and the more advanced B and C stages (data not shown), implying that it is a general feature of CLL cases. Fig. 1a shows that CD5 is naturally phosphorylated on tyrosines in CD5+ Daudi cells similarly as in CLL cells. Importantly, we failed to observe CD5 phosphorylation in control cells from (CD5+) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) in normal blood T cells (all of which express CD5) and in cord blood B cells (70% of which express CD5) as shown in Fig. 1c.
|
Because CD5 phosphorylation on tyrosine is essential to mediate signal in B cells (13, 14, 15), our results suggested that the CD5-transfected cell line was a bona fide model for studying the role of CD5 on gene regulation and may provide insights into the role of CD5 in CLL. This led us to analyze vector- and CD5-transfected Daudi cells by means of gene expression profiling and to compare these data with those generated from fresh CLL samples.
Differential expression of genes involved in CD5 signaling
Comparison of (pNT) vector- and CD5-transfected B cells showed that among 38,500 potential human coding gene sequences, (>54,000 probe sets), 581 were up-regulated by CD5 >1.5-fold and 215 were up-regulated >2-fold (supplemental information S1),5 whereas 525 were down-regulated >1.5-fold and 84 were down-regulated >2-fold (supplemental information S2). A Gene Ontology analysis program was used to organize the expression data of differentially expressed genes. Thirty-one gene groups were categorized according to their functions, and the number of genes up-regulated (Fig. 2 top, filled histograms) or down-regulated (open histograms) within each group is shown. It appeared that CD5 stimulated most (28/31) of metabolic pathways described here in which the number of up-regulated genes exceeds the number of down-regulated ones. In seven of these pathways all of the genes were up-regulated and none were down-regulated. These pathways include that of Jak-STAT (10/10 genes up-regulated), biosynthesis of steroids, adipocytokine signaling, and aminoacyl-tRNA synthases (6/6), Gly-Ser-Thr metabolism (5/5), and glycolysis and tight junction (4/4). Thus, although CD5 is a negative regulator of BCR-mediated early events, it is nevertheless able to stimulate the transcription of several hundred genes in B cells and to inhibit the expression of many others.
|
|
B/NF-
B-cascade genes RElB (2.28), IL-10 (1.70), Bcl3 (2.1), TLR8 (1.85), and STAT1 (1.74); TGF
signaling genes TGFB1 (1.59), STAT1 and STAT3 (2.0), MAPK9 (1.60), and RUNX3 (1.88); oncogenes PIM1 (1.52) and PIM2 (1.57); cholesterol synthesis genes (14 of 16 genes were stimulated and none was inhibited, see MAPP data in supplemental information S3); and genes involved in adipogenesis such as RARA (5.0), CEBPB (2.6) and PCK2 (3.0). In brief, the overall CD5 activity can be viewed as inhibitory for RNA and protein processing and stimulatory for metabolic processes such as amino acid, steroid, and lipid metabolism and for several intracellular signaling pathways. Evidence for a CD5 signature in CLL and validation of individual genes
Unsupervised hierarchical clustering was performed using 22,277 gene probes across the B-CLL, healthy B cells, wild-type Daudi, and transformed Daudi samples. Our transformed Daudi cells clustered with the wild-type ones previously described by others (as evidenced from data available on line; see Material and Methods), thereby validating our own cell line. Thus, transfection of vector or CD5 did not significantly change the whole pattern of gene expression in Daudi cells (Fig. 3a).
Supervised hierarchical clustering was then performed on significantly CD5-modulated genes by using a very stringent test (false discovery rate = 0). One hundred twenty-two genes were selected that constitute a true CD5 signature. As shown in Fig. 3b, CLL samples are closely grouped with the CD5 signal, whereas healthy individuals are closely grouped with the pNT signal.
Thus B-CLL cells shared a common gene expression pattern with CD5-transfected cells, but not with empty vector-transfected B cells.
To further validate these results, seven genes, the expressions of which were regulated in the same manner in CD5+ Daudi cells and in CLL cells according to DNA microarray data (Table II), were studied by real-time PCR. By looking at Table I, it is intuitive that genes up-regulated by CD5 are strongly expressed in CLL and, conversely, that genes down-regulated by CD5 are underexpressed in comparison to normal B cells. We selected genes with less obvious functions in B cells such as those involved in cholesterol synthesis (MVK and SC4MOL) or those involved in proteasome pathway (UBE2D1 and SMD3) or mRNA processing (LSM3). CCL3 and CD86 were selected as controls. We show (Fig. 4) that the expression of CCL3, SC4MOL, and MVK was increased whereas that of CD86, UBE2D1, SMD3, and LSM3 was decreased in both CLL and CD5+ cells in comparison to normal B cells and empty vector cells, respectively. For all seven genes, the ratios of CLL/healthy controls and CD5/vector (Fig. 4) were close to those obtained from microarrays (Table II), thereby validating the DNA microchip data described here.
|
|
Our previous results demonstrated that consecutive to BCR engagement, CD5 must be phosphorylated on tyrosines within its cytoplasmic domain to regulate the BCR signal (14, 15). To further dissect the role of CD5, real-time PCR experiments were performed in Daudi cells transfected with various CD5 mutants and expressions of the above seven genes were quantified. Tailless TL1-CD5 and TL4-CD5 were deleted from the domains starting at residues 380 and 468, respectively, and
CD5 was deleted from the 16 residues encompassing Y429 and Y441 (14, 15). As shown in Fig. 5, TL4-CD5 deleted of the 3 serines at the C-terminal end (28) had similar regulatory activity than full length CD5. In contrast, TL1-CD5 and
CD5 had no significant regulatory activity. Because BCR engagement phosphorylated CD5 on tyrosines, the role of which was further highlighted in the above experiments, we analyzed the effect of BCR stimulation on gene expression.
|
|
Similar results were observed with SMD3 and LSM3, two genes down-regulated by CD5. We found no difference between vector and CD5-TL1 cells for the expression of SMD3 and LSM3, whereas CD5 cells displayed lower levels of both transcripts. Inhibition of SMD3 and LSM3 was even more pronounced in anti-IgM-stimulated CD5 cells (Fig. 5b). Note also that CLL cells displayed significantly lower amounts of transcripts than normal B cells, this difference being amplified by anti-IgM stimulation.
In conclusion, these experiments discriminated between BCR- and CD5-mediated signals. We found that CD5 needed to be phosphorylated in Daudi-cells to amplify BCR-mediated signal, whether its effect was stimulatory or inhibitory on gene expression. Although not formally demonstrated in CLL, it is likely that CD5 played a role in these cells as well. Indeed, respective amplification or inhibition of the four genes studied here is very similar between CLL cells and CD5-transfected B cells.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
An interesting question not addressed here is whether CD5 is differentially phosphorylated in mutated vs unmutated cases. Indeed, anergy is more prominent in mutated CLL and may therefore correlate with CD5 activation. In contrast, because CD5 is activated following BCR engagement it may be strongly phosphorylated in unmutated CLL. Unfortunately, we do not yet understand the molecular mechanism of CD5 phosphorylation, the discovery of which would help us understand the BCR signaling defects in CLL.
At variance with CLL, we failed to detect constitutive phosphorylation on CD5 from mantle zone lymphoma samples (Fig. 1) although CD5 underwent phosphorylation following anti-IgM stimulation in vitro (our unpublished results), suggesting that CD5 may not signal in this disease in vivo. Indeed, albeit for a few genes such as CCL4 (see below), the pattern of gene expression of CLL is very different from that published in mantle zone lymphoma.
Likewise, comparison of CD5+ and CD5– B cells on a single CD5 expression criteria would be inappropriate for defining a CD5 signature because these cells differ by thousands of transcripts, including CD5 inducers, making it impossible to discriminate the effect of CD5 from that of other molecules. Possibly the best validation of our model is the finding that most transcripts, the expressions of which were increased or decreased by CD5, are especially relevant to CLL physiology. Previous gene array studies demonstrated that B-CLL shared a common signature related to memory B cells irrespective of their Ig mutational status (1, 2, 3). Noteworthily, it has been shown that CCR7 expression is higher in CLL than in normal memory B cells (3). In CLL, interaction of CCR7 with its ligand synergizes with integrins for the migration of malignant cells into lymph nodes (32). This is in agreement with our finding that both CCR7 (Table I) and integrin-mediated cell adhesion are up-regulated by CD5 (Fig 2). Integrins also synergize with VEGF to enhance the chemokine-induced motility of CLL cells, but not of normal B cells, through the endothelium (32). Angiogenesis is indeed augmented in the bone marrow and lymph nodes of CLL patients (33), partly due to the autocrine effect of VEGF. Interestingly, VEGF enhances survival in CLL likely through interaction with the VEGF receptor, which associates with STAT1 and STAT3 (34). Our finding that CD5 up-regulated several STAT genes in addition to VEGF is therefore relevant to CLL.
Among chemokines, a slight decrease in CXCL12/SDF1 (0.59 ratio) was observed in the CD5+ cells, possibly in agreement with the finding that CLL patients had lower SDF1 plasma levels than normal controls (35). Intriguingly, two chemokines, CCL3 and CCL4, were strongly up-regulated by CD5 (Table I), whereas their respective counter receptors (CCR1 and CCR5) were unchanged. Although unexplored yet in CLL, CCL4 is increased in (CD5+) MCLs (36). Of note, B cells recruit regulatory T cells through CCL4 (37). Also relevant to CLL physiology is the enhancement of IL-10 and IL-10R by CD5 as expected from our previous results (13). IL-10, together with TGF
signaling, may participate in the immune defect in CLL. TGF
is released by CLL cells (38) and inhibits both hemopoietic progenitors in synergy with CCL3/MIP1
(39) and CLL B cell proliferation through interference with proliferative T cell signals (40). In this respect, normal and leukemic CD5+ B cells respond to IL-2 and IL-15 in vitro (18, 28, 41) in agreement with CD5-enhanced IL-2R
(Table I), IL-2R
, and IL-15R
expressions (supplemental information).
The recently described Wnt pathway in CLL (42) is also induced by CD5 and may contribute to the defect in apoptosis that characterizes this disease. Several other genes pertaining to immune regulation and expressed in memory B cells and/or in CLL are up-regulated by CD5 as shown in Table I: the CD27-ligand CD70 (43), CD72, another negative regulator of BCR signaling (44), and TLR9 (45). TLR9 is of special interest as it is constitutively expressed in memory cells and able to induce B cell proliferation in these cells independently of BCR stimulation (46, 47). Because many B-CLL clones are autoreactive (17, 43, 47), they might be vigorously selected by dual BCR and TLR engagement.
CLL is characterized by the poor Ag-presenting capacity of malignant B cells, possibly in part due to low B7 Ag expression (48) which is reversed by CD40-activation (49). Given the inhibition of CD80, CD86, and several genes involved in proteasomal processing by CD5, malignant cells may fail to efficiently load MHC Ags with peptides and deliver a second signal to effector cells. Among immune deficits in CLL, an impaired Ig production and a compromised class switching are prominent. The 2-fold increase in Bcl3 induced by CD5 should be relevant to CLL physiology inasmuch as Bcl3-transgenic mice developed altered Ig production and B cell expansion (50).
Unexpectedly, CD5 enhanced the expression of most cholesterol synthesis genes and genes involved in adipogenesis (supplemental information). This may seem anecdotal, but the ability of statins (inhibitors of HMG CoA) to induce apoptosis of CLL cells was reported years ago (51). One possible explanation for the role of lipids in the survival of malignant cells is the enhanced ability of the CD5- and BCR-associated tyrosine kinase Lyn, which resides constitutively in lipid rafts, to associate with the BCR in lipid-enriched membranes (52). Lipid-rich membranes may also help cells migrate through endothelium and lipid synthesis may favor the metabolic modifications of proteins such as those involved in the Wnt pathway (53), which are also shown to be activated in CLL cells and contribute to malignant cell survival.
The discovery that CD5 inhibited RNA processing was also surprising. Although not trendy, this subject has been studied by a few groups. It was indeed shown that CLL cells displayed RNA processing abnormalities (54, 55). Strikingly, thymidine kinase mRNA is 100-fold higher in CLL than in normal lymphocytes without the corresponding enzymatic activity (56). These results are relevant to what we observed in CD5+ cells, which may help our understanding of how the lack of ribosomal and mRNA processing and trafficking leading to the accumulation of abnormal RNAs in the nucleus might disturb the cells normal feedback systems or generate abnormal proteins, thereby favoring the development of malignant conditions.
Based on our (13, 14, 15) work and that of others (7, 8, 9, 10) we hypothesize that, in CLL, chronic activation through the BCR and/or other as yet undetermined surface molecules promote cell survival. Recently, sustained signaling through the BCR by immobilized anti-IgM promoted CLL survival (57), although the status of CD5 was not investigated in this study. A likely hypothesis is that activated CD5 regulates redundant signals that all concur in B cell survival. For instance, STAT genes are involved in both TGF
signaling and adipogenesis pathways, whereas suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS) genes are involved in both cell growth and adipogenesis. In this respect it has been demonstrated that STAT5 phosphorylates PIM (58), which in turn interacts with SOCS proteins (59) It is tempting to ascribe to these genes a role in malignant cell survival, although their precise mechanisms of action need to be determined. It is worth mentioning here that acquisition of CD5 is associated with poor prognosis in diffuse large B cell lymphomas, supporting the view that CD5 is a survival factor in B cells (60).
One could note, however, that several genes, namely IL4, IL4R, CD23, and CXCR4, although present in CLL (47), are not influenced by CD5. It is intuitive that CLL cells differ from normal B cells in many aspects other than CD5 expression and activation and that several other genes may concur with the malignant phenotype. This is inferred from our quantitative data indicating that for most genes described in this article the differences between CLL and normal B cells were more significant than those between CD5- and vector-transfected cell lines. Yet, analysis of the entire set of genes modulated by CD5 clearly showed that CD5-transfected cells were closer to CLL cells whereas vector-transfected cells were closer to normal B cells (Fig. 3). Although different from CLL B cells, Burkitt lymphoma-derived Daudi cells have an intact signaling machinery and many constitutively phosphorylated proteins including Lyn (our unpublished observation), an Src kinase that couples the BCR to downstream signaling and is constitutively active in CLL (61).
Our data suggest that CD5 can be targeted in CLL either with molecules that would inhibit its phosphorylation or with Abs that may prevent its interactions with the BCR as already described (52). Thus, inhibiting CD5 expression by RNA interference should be able to induce the apoptosis of CLL B cells, provided that CD5 recycling is not too slow in this disease. In this respect it would be worthwhile and interesting to elicit the combined effect of an altered ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, previously shown to be affected in CLL at protein and enzymatic levels (62), with an altered control of the gene expression of several mRNA transcripts, on protein half-life and trafficking in CLL. Although we bring attention to many relevant pathways, interesting genes might have been discarded due to our elimination of transcripts absent in one cell line but present in the other and that merit further analysis. Our data provide a new useful cell model that may help to further investigate and possibly target CD5-emanating signals contributing to B-CLL leukemogenesis.
| Disclosures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 This work was supported by a 2005 grant from Association de Recherche sur le Cancer to A.D. ![]()
2 H.G.-G., and A.S.-P. contributed equally to the work. ![]()
3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Ali Dalloul, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U 764, 32 Rue des Carnets, France. E-mail address: ali.dalloul{at}u-psud.fr ![]()
4 Abbreviations used in this paper: CLL, chronic lymphocytic leukemia; Ct, cycle threshold; MAPP, microarray pathway profile; MCL, mantle cell lymphoma; MM, mismatch; PM, perfect match. ![]()
5 The online version of this article contains supplemental material. ![]()
Received for publication December 18, 2006. Accepted for publication July 16, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
4
1 integrin for chemokine-induced motility on and through endothelium. Blood 105: 4813-4819.
. Br. J. Haematol. 80: 480-487. [Medline]
and transforming growth factor
on hematopoietic progenitor/stem cell growth. Blood 84: 2175-2181.
from chronic lymphocytic leukemia-B cells interferes with proliferative T cell signals. Immunobiology 200: 128-139. [Medline]This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Sainz-Perez, H. Gary-Gouy, F. Gaudin, G. Maarof, A. Marfaing-Koka, T. de Revel, and A. Dalloul IL-24 Induces Apoptosis of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia B Cells Engaged into the Cell Cycle through Dephosphorylation of STAT3 and Stabilization of p53 Expression J. Immunol., November 1, 2008; 181(9): 6051 - 6060. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Garaud, C. Le Dantec, C. Berthou, P. M. Lydyard, P. Youinou, and Y. Renaudineau Selection of the Alternative Exon 1 from the cd5 Gene Down-Regulates Membrane Level of the Protein in B Lymphocytes J. Immunol., August 1, 2008; 181(3): 2010 - 2018. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |