|
|
||||||||

* Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics and Department of Pharmacology, and
Department of Microbiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A role for DAF in cellular immunity is also supported by studies of DAF knockout (Daf-1–/–) mice (11, 12, 13). In previous studies, we found that DAF deficiency significantly exacerbated systemic autoimmunity in MRL/lpr mice (12), and C57BL/6 Daf-1–/– mice immunized with two model Ags, OVA and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG), exhibited markedly enhanced CD4+ T cell recall response (13). Furthermore, Daf-1–/– mice immunized with MOG developed much more severe symptoms of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, a typical CD4+ T cell-mediated inflammatory condition of the CNS (13). One of the limitations of the immunization experiments with OVA and MOG was the use of CFA and the fact that the procedure primarily elicited CD4+ T cell responses. It is not known whether the regulatory effect of DAF on T cell immunity is restricted to CD4+ T cells and whether it can be observed in settings of natural T cell immune reactions during pathogenic infections. In the present study, we have addressed these questions by examining the CD8+ T cell response of wild-type (WT) and Daf-1–/– mice to lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) infection. We describe in this study that both the primary and memory CD8+ T cell responses to acute or chronic LCMV infection was dramatically enhanced in Daf-1–/– mice. Significantly, we found that the phenotype of enhanced CD8+ T cell immunity in Daf-1–/– mice was completely dependent on C3 or the receptor for the anaphylatoxin C5a. These results support the conclusion that DAF is a significant modulator of CD8+ T cell immunity in the setting of natural microbial infection and that it plays such a role by functioning as a complement regulator. Our data further highlight the connection between complement and T cell immunity and support a critical role of C5aR in the interaction between the two systems.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Daf-1–/– mice deficient in the Daf-1 gene, the murine homolog of human DAF, were generated by gene targeting as previously described (11). They were backcrossed onto the C57BL/6 background for 10 generations. Six time-backcrossed C57BL/6-C3–/– mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory, and were backcrossed in house for an additional five generations. A breeder pair of C5a receptor knockout (C5aR–/–) mice on the C57BL/6 background was provided by Dr. J. Lambris (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA) (14). C3–/– or C5aR–/– mice were cross-bred with Daf-1–/– mice to derive Daf-1–/–/C3–/– or Daf-1–/–/C5aR–/– mice, respectively. Male mice ages 8–12 wk were used in this study. Gender- and age-matched WT C57BL/6 mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory. All experimental protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Pennsylvania.
Reagents
Allophycocyanin-conjugated rat anti-mouse IFN-
(clone XMG1.2), PE- or FITC-conjugated rat anti-mouse CD8a (clone 53-6.7), PerCp-conjugated rat anti-mouse CD4 (clone RM4-5), allophycocyanin-conjugated rat anti-mouse CD44 (clone IM-7), FITC-conjugated rat anti-mouse CD62 ligand (CD62L, clone MEL-14), purified rat anti-mouse Fc receptor (clone 2.4G2), GolgiStop and Cytofix/Cytoperm kit were from BD Pharmingen. DMEM, L-glutamine, HEPES, PBS, nonessential amino acids, sodium pyruvate, 2-ME, and penicillin-streptomycin were from Invitrogen Life Technologies. LCMV gp33–41 peptide was synthesized by Sigma-Aldrich. FBS was from HyClone Laboratories. [3H]thymidine was from Amersham Biosciences. EL-4 cell line was from American Type Culture Collection.
Infection of mice with LCMV
LCMV-Armstrong and LCMV-clone 13 strains were propagated in vitro, and viral titers were determined by plaque assays as previously described (15). For acute LCMV infection, 2 x 105 PFU of LCMV-Armstrong were administered to mice by i.p. injection. Mice were sacrificed at day 6, 7, or 8 to collect the spleens for analysis of primary immune response or 2 mo later for memory immune response. For chronic LCMV infection, 2 x 106 PFU LCMV-clone 13 were administered to mice by i.v. injection through the tail vein. Mice were bled at day 8, 15, 30, and 45 to obtain PBMC for T cell analysis, and to obtain serum for monitoring virus clearance. Mice infected with clone 13 were sacrificed at day 50 postinfection for terminal analysis of splenocytes. Experiments were also performed to test the function of the memory immune response to LCMV infection. For these experiments, mice were first infected with 2 x 105 PFU LCMV-Armstrong (i.p.) and then challenged 5 mo later with 2 x 106 PFU LCMV-clone 13 (i.v.). Mice were sacrificed at different time points, and the titers of LCMV-clone 13 virus in their spleens were determined by plaque assays as previously described (15).
Preparation of splenocytes and PBMC
Spleens were first cut into small pieces and meshed with the blunt end of a plastic syringe in a petri dish on ice. Single-cell suspension was prepared by passing the spleen homogenate through a 70-µm cell strainer (Falcon) and cell pellets were collected after centrifugation at 600 x g for 7 min. Contaminating RBC were lysed by resuspending the cell pellets in ACK buffer (0.15 M NH4Cl, 1 mM KHCO3, 0.1 mM EDTA (pH 7.3)) for 3 min and then washing twice in PBS. To prepare PBMC, 100 µl of blood was collected from each mouse by retro-orbital bleeding using sodium citrate as an anticoagulant. RBC were removed by ACK lysis followed by washing with PBS. Numbers of splenocytes and PBMCs were determined on a Beckman Coulter counter.
Analysis of cell surface markers
A total of 1 x 106 splenocytes or 5 x 105 PBMC in 30 µl of staining buffer (PBS containing 1% BSA and 0.1% NaN3) were first treated with the anti-Fc receptor mAb 2.4G2 (Fc Block) on ice for 15 min to reduce nonspecific staining. The cells were then stained with various combinations of Abs for 30 min at 4°C in the dark. After washing twice with staining buffer, cells were fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde and analyzed by FACS on a FACSCalibur instrument using the CellQuest software (BD Biosciences). Data were analyzed with the FlowJo software (Tree Star).
In vitro Ag restimulation of splenocytes and intracellular staining for IFN-
Splenocytes were adjusted to 1 x 107 cells/ml in complete medium (DMEM containing 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 10 mM HEPES, 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids, 50 µM 2-ME, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, and 100 U/ml penicillin-streptomycin). A total of 100 µl of the cell suspension was seeded into each well of a 96-well U-bottom plate. Another 100 µl of complete medium containing GolgiStop (used at 1/750 dilution) and the LCMV gp33–41 peptide (final concentration, 0.01 µM) was added to each well. After 5 h of culture, cells were harvested and were stained sequentially for surface CD8a and intracellular IFN-
. Surface staining was performed as described and intracellular staining was performed with the Cytofix/Cytoperm kit. The frequency of IFN-
-producing cells in gated CD8+ T cells was determined by FACS analysis.
Quantitation of LCMV-specific CD8+ T cells using MHC-tetramer
Allophycocyanin-conjugated gp33–41/Db tetramer was prepared in-house and used at 1/500 dilution as previously described (16). Splenocytes were first stained with gp33–41/Db tetramer for 30 min at room temperature in the dark, followed by staining with FITC-conjugated rat anti-mouse CD8a at 4°C for another 30 min. After washing in PBS, cells were fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde and analyzed by FACS.
CTL assay
JAM test was used to determine the CTL activity of splenocytes from LCMV-infected mice. This method is based on the principle of DNA fragmentation after cell death (17). EL-4 cells (a mouse lymphoma cell line, C57BL/6 background) were used as target cells. Cells were cultured in complete DMEM, and exponentially growing cells were treated with the gp33–41 peptide (final concentration, 0.01 µM) and [3H]thymidine (final concentration, 5 µCi/ml) for 5 h at 37°C. After extensive washing in DMEM, the gp33–41 peptide-pulsed and [3H]thymidine-pulsed EL-4 cells were mixed at different ratios with splenocytes from LCMV-Armstrong infected WT or Daf-1–/– mice (day 7 after LCMV infection) in 96-well U-bottom plates. After cell mixing, plates were centrifuged at 200 x g for 5 min and incubated for 5 h at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator. Cells were harvested onto glass fiber filters using a cell harvester (Tomtec) and the specific CTL activity was determined by scintillation counting according to the following formula: percentage of specific lysis = ((cpm from spontaneous release wells – cpm from experimental wells)/cpm from spontaneous release wells) x 100, where the average cpm from experimental wells (wells containing both target cells and effectors) and the average cpm from spontaneous release wells (wells containing target cells only) (17) are used.
Statistical analysis
Data were expressed as mean ± SEM. Groups were compared by two-tailed, unpaired Students t test and the significance was defined at p < 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To determine whether DAF regulates CD8+ T cell immunity, we infected groups of WT and Daf-1–/– mice with LCMV-Armstrong, a virus strain that causes acute infection and a strong CD8+ T cell response in the mouse (15, 18, 19). On day 6, 7, or 8 postinfection, mice were sacrificed, and the percentage and total number of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in their spleens were determined by FACS. As shown in Fig. 1, A and B, Daf-1–/– mouse spleens were found to contain a significantly higher percentage of CD8+ T cells than WT mouse spleens at day 7 postinfection (30.40 ± 1.60% vs 20.48 ± 1.45%, n = 4 mice per group, p < 0.005). The total number of CD8+ T cells in Daf-1–/– mouse spleens was also greatly increased (32.80 ± 2.76 x 106/spleen vs 12.50 ± 1.64 x 106/spleen, p < 0.001) (Fig. 1C). Similar increases in CD8+ T cell expansion in Daf-1–/– mice were also observed on days 6 and 8 postinfection (Fig. 1D). Because there was no difference between naive (noninfected) WT and Daf-1–/– mice in their splenic CD8+ T cell frequency or total number (data not shown and Ref. 20), these results suggested that DAF deficiency either promoted Ag-specific CD8+ T cell expansion or impaired the depletion of nonspecific CD8+ T cells in response to acute LCMV infection. We observed no significant difference in the frequency of splenic CD4+ T cells between LCMV-infected WT and Daf-1–/– mice (Fig. 1A). However, in three of four independent experiments, the total number of splenic CD4+ T cells was significantly greater in Daf-1–/– mice than in WT mice (data not shown).
|
To further characterize the highly expanded CD8+ T cells in Daf-1–/– mice, we analyzed the number of splenic CD8+ T cells that were specific for the LCMV antigenic gp33–41 peptide by staining total splenocytes with the gp33–41/Db tetramer (16). Fig. 2, A–C, shows that the percentage and total number of gp33–41/Db tetramer-positive CD8+ T cells in Daf-1–/– mouse spleens were significantly higher than that in the WT mouse spleens (percentage: 2.02 ± 0.15% vs 1.30 ± 0.10%; total number: 21.84 ± 2.39 x 105/spleen vs 7.76 ± 0.43 x 105/spleen; n = 4 mice per group, p < 0.01 for both measurements). Separately, we stimulated splenocytes from LCMV-infected WT and Daf-1–/– mice with gp33–41 and analyzed the number of IFN-
-secreting CD8+ T cells after intracellular staining of IFN-
. Fig. 2, E–G, shows that Daf-1–/– mouse spleens were again found to contain a significantly higher percentage and total number of IFN-
-producing CD8+ T cells than WT mouse spleens (percentage: 4.44 ± 0.41% vs 2.50 ± 0.29%; total number: 48.23 ± 6.18 x 105/spleen vs 14.99 ± 1.57 x 105/spleen; n = 4 mice, p < 0.01 for both measurements). These data indicated that Daf-1–/– mice had increased Ag-specific CD8+ T cell expansion upon acute LCMV infection. Notably, the relative percentage of gp33–41/Db tetramer-positive (Fig. 2D) or IFN-
-producing cells (Fig. 2H) among gated CD8+ T cells showed a trend of increase in Daf-1–/– mice but did not differ significantly from that of WT mice, suggesting that DAF deficiency caused expansion of gp33–41-specific as well as other epitope-specific CD8+ T cells.
|
To evaluate the functional significance of enhanced Ag-specific CD8+ T cell immunity in Daf-1–/– mice, we compared the total CTL activities of WT and Daf-1–/– mouse splenocytes at day 7 after LCMV-Armstrong infection. For this experiment, EL-4 cells pulsed with the viral antigenic peptide gp33–41 were used as target cells (25). Fig. 3A shows that the total CTL activity of Daf-1–/– mouse splenocytes was significantly higher than that of WT mouse splenocytes at three different E:T ratios. This most likely reflected an increased number of gp33–41-specific CD8+ T cells in Daf-1–/– mice rather than higher CTL activity of individual Daf-1–/– CD8+ T cells. Indeed, in a separate assay wherein we normalized the effector cell number in splenocytes based on the frequency of gp33–41/Db tetramer-positive CD8+ T cells, we observed no difference in total CTL activity between WT and Daf-1–/– mice (data not shown). In a parallel experiment, we investigated the antiviral activity of CD8+ T cells in vivo by determining the LCMV titers in WT and Daf-1–/– mouse spleens at day 3, 5, and 7 post infection with LCMV-Armstrong. As expected, we observed that the virus titers in both groups of mice decreased exponentially between days 3 and 7, indicating that the virus was being cleared by the host (Fig. 3B). Notably, we found that the viral titer in the spleen of Daf-1–/– mice was significantly lower than that in the spleen of WT mice at days 5 and 7, suggesting that Daf-1–/– mice eliminated LCMV more efficiently than WT mice. These data correlated well with the increased CD8+ T cell number in Daf-1–/– mice as described and suggested that the more vigorously expanded CD8+ T cells in the mutant mice were functionally relevant.
|
The kinetics of viral clearance and immune response to chronic LCMV infection is significantly different from that of acute LCMV infection (26). Chronic LCMV infection is characterized by a high virus load in multiple tissues for 2–3 mo (15). Although the infection is eventually under control in most tissues, the virus is not completely eliminated from the host (15). The induction of CD8+ T cell response in chronic LCMV infection also differs in that, although CD4+ T cells are not necessary for an acute CD8+ T cell response, they are indispensable for CD8+ T cell responses in chronic LCMV infection (27, 28). To examine the CD8+ T cell response of Daf-1–/– mice during chronic LCMV infection, we infected groups of WT and Daf-1–/– mice with LCMV clone 13, a more virulent LCMV strain that causes chronic infection in mice (15). We then monitored their CD8+ T cell response by analyzing PBMC (day 8, 15, 30, and 45) or splenocytes (day 50, terminal) for the frequency of CD8+ or gp33–41/Db tetramer-positive T cells. As shown in Fig. 4, A and B, we found that the percentage of CD8+ or gp33–41/Db tetramer-positive T cells in PBMC of Daf-1–/– mice was significantly higher than the percentage found in WT mice at all time points examined. Notably, increased total and gp33–41-specific CD8+ T cells in Daf-1–/– mice correlated with lower blood viral titers in these mice at latter but not early time points after infection (Fig. 4C). When splenocytes were restimulated at day 50 with gp33–41, a higher percentage (Fig. 4, D and E) and total number (Fig. 4F) of Daf-1–/– mouse splenocytes secreted IFN-
as assessed by intracellular staining (percentage: 0.32 ± 0.01% vs 0.13 ± 0.01%; total number: 2.3 ± 1.26 x 105/spleen vs 0.80 ± 0.28 x 105/spleen, n = 4 mice per group, p < 0.001 for both measurements). These data demonstrated that Daf-1–/– mice could mount a persistently stronger CD8+ T cell response to chronic LCMV infection.
|
In the case of acute LCMV infection, most of the activated T cells are eliminated by activation-induced cell death after resolution of virus infection (16). Only
5% of the these cells will survive and develop into memory T cells, which can give rise to a quicker and more vigorous recall response upon reencounter with the same Ag. To determine whether DAF deficiency also influences the development of memory CD8+ T cells, groups of WT and Daf-1–/– mice were infected with LCMV-Armstrong and examined 2 mo later. Mice were sacrificed and splenocytes were analyzed for the frequency of gp33–41/Db tetramer-positive cells directly or of IFN-
-producing CD8+ T cells after gp33–41 restimulation. Although there was no difference in the spleen size or total number of splenocytes between the two groups of mice, Daf-1–/– mice were found to contain significantly more gp33–41/Db tetramer-positive T cells in their spleens than WT mice (percentage: 0.95 ± 0.08% vs 0.52 ± 0.03%; total number: 4.58 ± 0.27 x 105/spleen vs 2.75 ± 0.35 x 105/spleen; n = 5 mice per group, p < 0.005 for both measurements) (Fig. 5, A–C). Similarly, in response to gp33–41 peptide restimulation, Daf-1–/– mouse spleens contained significantly more IFN-
-secreting CD8+ T cells than WT mouse spleens (percentage: 1.09 ± 0.05% vs 0.70 ± 0.03%; total number: 5.18 ± 0.43 x 105/spleen vs 2.51 ± 0.27 x 105/spleen; n = 5 mice, p < 0.001 for both measurements) (Fig. 5, D–F). These data indicated that more memory CD8+ T cells had developed in Daf-1–/– mouse spleens after acute LCMV infection.
|
|
Enhanced CD8+ T cell response to LCMV infection in Daf-1–/– mice is C3- and C5aR-dependent
To explore the mechanism of enhanced CD8+ T cell immunity to LCMV infection in Daf-1–/– mice, we investigated the consequences of C3 or C5aR gene deficiency in Daf-1–/– mice. Daf-1–/– mice were crossed with C3–/– and C5aR–/– mice, respectively, to generate Daf-1–/–/C3–/– and Daf-1–/–/C5aR–/– mice. Comparison of the total and Ag-specific CD8+ T cell expansions upon acute LCMV-Armstrong infection in WT, Daf-1–/–, Daf-1–/–/C3–/–, and Daf-1–/–/C5aR–/– mice revealed that the enhanced CD8+ T cell immunity phenotype in Daf-1–/– mice was completely rescued by either C3 or C5aR deficiency (Fig. 7). This result indicated that enhanced CD8+ T cell immunity to LCMV infection in Daf-1–/– mice was dependent on complement activation and C5aR signaling.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is notable that the phenotype of increased T cell immunity in LCMV-infected Daf-1–/– mice was more pronounced with CD8+ T cells than with CD4+ T cells. This difference may be related to the nature of LCMV-elicited T cell response as the virus is known to drive primarily a CD8+ T cell response in the mouse (32, 33, 34, 35). Nevertheless, this result contrasted with the specific inhibition of CD4+ T cell immunity by CD59, another GPI-anchored membrane complement regulator, in mice infected with recombinant vaccinia virus (36). A further important difference between the inhibitory functions of DAF and CD59 in T cell immunity is that the activity of CD59 was shown to be complement-independent (36), whereas we have demonstrated that enhanced CD8+ T cell immunity in LCMV-infected Daf-1–/– mice was dependent on C3 and C5aR. Thus, GPI-anchored membrane complement regulators could influence T cell immunity to viral infection via at least two different mechanisms.
The complement-dependent nature of the Daf-1–/– mouse phenotype in LCMV infection is consistent with our previous finding that C3 and C5 were necessary for Daf-1–/– mice to develop a CD4+ T cell recall hyperresponse after OVA or MOG immunization (13). It also agrees with previous studies showing that C3 was required for optimal T cell expansion in response to viral infection in WT mice (37, 38). Suresh et al. (37) have shown earlier that C3 but not CR1/CR2 deficiency caused epitope-specific impairment in CD8+ T cell expansion after LCMV infection in mice of two genetic backgrounds. On the 129/B6 background, NP396–404-specific CD8+ T cells in WT mice were
2-fold more than that in C3–/– mice, whereas on the C57BL/6 background gp33–41-specific CD8+ T cells were twice as many in WT mice than in C3-deficient mice (37). In a model of influenza virus infection, Kopf et al. (38) demonstrated that C3 deficiency resulted in delayed viral clearance, reduced priming of CD4+ Th cells and CD8+ CTLs, and severely impaired recruitment of virus-specific T cells into the lungs. Consistent with our demonstration of an essential role for C5aR in the Daf-1–/– mouse phenotype, blocking the interaction of C5a-C5aR by a peptide antagonist effectively inhibited the expansion of CD8+ T cells specific for the immunodominant NP366–374 peptide of influenza virus (39). Taken together, these data suggested that complement augmented antiviral T cell immunity via a C5aR-dependent, CR1/CR2-independent mechanism and that in the absence of DAF, this adjuvant effect of complement on T cell immunity was amplified, presumably by increased C5a generation.
Several questions arise from our hypothesis and remain to be addressed experimentally. First, does the LCMV cause more complement activation in Daf-1–/– mice than in WT mice and, if so, does it occur in the fluid phase (plasma) or on specific cell types? Second, how and on what cells does the C5a-C5aR interaction promote T cell immunity? Although we have not attempted to measure and compare complement activation in LCMV-infected WT and Daf-1–/– mice, complement is known to be activated by West Nile virus in vivo in the mouse (40, 41, 42). Furthermore, we have recently found that LPS, a TLR4 ligand and alternative pathway complement activator from Gram-negative bacteria, caused significantly increased systemic complement activation in Daf-1–/– mice than in WT mice (43). It is therefore quite possible that LCMV similarly induced a higher degree of complement activation in Daf-1–/– mice, either systemically or locally on cells it infects. In the case of LPS-treated Daf-1–/– mice, increased complement activation synergized with LPS-mediated TLR4 signaling in a C5aR-dependent manner, resulting in greatly elevated production of inflammatory cytokines including IL-6 and TNF-
(43). By analogy to LPS-stimulated events, it may be speculated that a similar synergistic interaction between complement and TLR occurred in LCMV-infected Daf-1–/– mice, which promoted dendritic cell maturation and/or T cell priming through elevated inflammatory cytokine production and adhesion/costimulatory molecule expression. Relevant to this hypothesis, previous work by others has shown that LCMV-driven innate and CD8+ T cell immunity in mice was dependent on TLR2 and the obligatory TLR signaling adaptor molecule MyD88 (44).
In summary, we have shown a marked C5aR-dependent enhancement in anti-LCMV CD8+ T cell immunity in Daf-1–/– mice. This finding further highlights the connection between complement and the adaptive immune system and reaffirms the role of DAF as a negative inhibitor of T cell immunity in vivo. The knowledge that complement and its membrane regulators such as DAF mediate primary and memory T cell immunity may be exploited therapeutically in the treatment of human immune disorders and in the development of effective vaccines for cancer and infectious diseases.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Disclosures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 This work was supported by Grants AI-49344, AI-44970, and AI-62388 from the National Institutes of Health. ![]()
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Wen-Chao Song, Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics and Department of Pharmacology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 1254 Biomedical Research Building II/III, 421 Curie Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104. E-mail address: Song{at}spirit.gcrc.upenn.edu ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: DAF, decay-accelerating factor; LCMV, lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus; CD62L, CD62 ligand; MOG, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein; WT, wild type. ![]()
Received for publication June 19, 2007. Accepted for publication June 21, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. Pavlov, H. Raedler, S. Yuan, S. Leisman, W.-h. Kwan, P. N. Lalli, M. E. Medof, and P. S. Heeger Donor Deficiency of Decay-Accelerating Factor Accelerates Murine T Cell-Mediated Cardiac Allograft Rejection J. Immunol., October 1, 2008; 181(7): 4580 - 4589. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. N. Lalli, M. G. Strainic, M. Yang, F. Lin, M. E. Medof, and P. S. Heeger Locally produced C5a binds to T cell-expressed C5aR to enhance effector T-cell expansion by limiting antigen-induced apoptosis Blood, September 1, 2008; 112(5): 1759 - 1766. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Varela, M. Imai, C. Atkinson, R. Ohta, M. Rapisardo, and S. Tomlinson Modulation of Protective T Cell Immunity by Complement Inhibitor Expression on Tumor Cells Cancer Res., August 15, 2008; 68(16): 6734 - 6742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS |