|
|
||||||||




* Servicio Regional de Inmunología y Alergia, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain;
Fundación IMABIS, Laboratorio de Investigación, Hospital Civil, Málaga, Spain;
Bial-Aristegui, Research and Development Department, Bilbao, Spain; and
Departamento de Medicina, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
RI and galectin-3 (Fc
RI>galectin-3), but not against Fc
RII. These observations represent a novel view of neutrophils as possible source of ECP in IgE-dependent diseases. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
RI) (32), the low-affinity receptor for IgE (Fc
RII/CD23) (33, 34), and galectin-3 (35, 36). We have previously shown that specific Ags were able to activate functional responses by neutrophils from allergic patients sensitized to Ags of the same type as those which produce clinical allergic symptoms. For example, allergens induce in neutrophils the release of myeloperoxidase, IL-8, and elastase, the down-modulation of L-selectin, and the respiratory burst and intracellular increase of Ca2+ levels (37, 38, 39, 40, 41). If eosinophils are unable to release ECP by an IgE-dependent mechanism, can neutrophils do so? The present work was undertaken to analyze this question. | Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The Ags were commercially available Ag extracts, including D1 (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus), G3 (Dactylis glomerata), T9 (Olea europaea), and W6 (Artemisia vulgaris). They were purchased from Bial-Aristegui. Goat anti-human IgE Ab, goat anti-human IgG Ab, and the Fix-and-Perm cell kit were obtained from Caltag Laboratories. Goat or mouse IgG, L-
-phosphatidylcholine, platelet-activating factor (PAF) (
-acetyl-
-O-alkyl), and LPS were from Sigma-Aldrich. Ficoll-Hypaque, PBS, RPMI 1640, FBS, and penicillin/streptomycin were purchased from BioWhittaker. PCR primers and protein G-Sepharose were obtained from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. Anti-human CD9 Ab, anti-human CD16 Ab, anti-human CD203c Ab, anti-human CD66b Ab, anti-human Fc
RII/CD23 Ab (clone 9P.25), FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG Ab, and goat anti-mouse IgG micromagnetic beads were obtained from Beckman Coulter-IZASA. Polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes were from Bio-Rad. mAb against human ECP was from Pharmacia Diagnostics. Horseradish-conjugated anti-mouse IgG Ab was obtained from Promega. Anti-human galectin-3 Ab (clone A3A12) and anti-human Fc
RI
-chain Ab (clone AER-37/CRA1) were purchased from Abcan and eBioscience, respectively. 35Izolabel (35S) was obtained from Nucliber. Kodak X-Omat AR films were obtained from Kodak. Mouse mAb specific for human anti-
-actin (sc-8432) was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. All cultured reagents had endotoxin levels of
0.01 ng/ml, as tested by the Limulus lysate assay (Coatest; Chromogenix).
Patients and controls
The studied group included adult atopic patients with intermittent bronchial asthma and healthy adult nonatopic volunteer controls (42). The group of asthmatic patients had positive skin-prick test (Bial-Arístegui) and specific IgE (HYTEC 288; Hycor Biomedical-IZASA) to at least one common Ag. The subjects received no specific hyposensitization. The patients were not allowed to take any bronchodilators within the 8 h before challenge of cells in vitro. Oral bronchodilators were withheld for 24 h, and none of the subjects had taken corticosteroids, disodium cromoglycate, or nedocromil sodium in the previous week. The healthy controls had no history of allergy or bronchial symptoms, and had negative skin-prick test (Bial-Arístegui) and specific IgE (HYTEC 288) to a battery of inhalant Ags (house-dust mites, pollens, molds, and animal danders). The hospital ethics committee approved the study and each subject gave informed consent.
Preparation of neutrophils and eosinophils
Human neutrophils were isolated as previously described (37, 38, 39, 40, 41). Neutrophil preparations were further purified using a MACS by incubation with mouse anti-human CD9, anti-human CD203c, and anti-human CD14 Abs, and then with anti-mouse IgG micromagnetic beads. The purity of neutrophils was on average >99%. To prepare mRNA for RT-PCR, neutrophils were purified even further by repeating the procedure above thrice more, using anti-CD9, anti-human CD203c, and anti-human CD14 Abs each time, which reduced contaminating eosinophils to 0.001–0.004% of the final cell population. Human eosinophils were analogously purified by MACS, using anti-CD16, anti-CD203, and anti-human CD14 Abs as previously described (43).
Neutrophil and eosinophil culture: treatment with different agents
Neutrophils and eosinophils were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and maintained at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% O2. For stimulation treatments, cells were incubated with Ags, anti-human IgE Ab, goat IgG, or agonists at 37°C for the times indicated in figure legends. LPS was used at 1 µg/ml (44). None of the reagents affected the viability of the cells at the concentrations used in this work, as confirmed by the trypan blue dye-exclusion test.
ECP release
ECP released was measured in the culture supernatants by ELISA (CAP system immunoassay; Pharmacia) according to the manufacturers instructions.
ECP expression analysis by flow cytometry
Neutrophils (2 x 106, cultured at a density of 6.6 x 106/ml) were cooled on ice and washed with cold PBS. Cells were incubated with PE-conjugated anti-CD66b Ab or the IgG1-PE isotype control Ab, for 15 min. After washing with PBS, cells were fixed and permeabilized using the Fix-and-Perm cell kit, following the manufacturers indications. Next, cells were incubated for 20 min with anti-human ECP (1 µg), washed with PBS, and pelleted by centrifugation. Then, cells were incubated with FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG at 4°C in the dark for 30 min, washed, and finally resuspended in PBS. In the isotype control, the primary Ab was omitted. Flow cytometry analysis was performed using an Epics XL-MCL system (Coulter-IZASA). For each sample, 10,000 events were analyzed for fluorescence intensity. Results were expressed as frequency of fluorescence-positive cells (%).
Immunofluorescence staining
After treatment, 5 x 106 cells (cultured at a density of 6.6 x 106/ml) were harvested, washed with PBS, and smeared onto poly-L-lysine-treated glass slides. The slides were fixed at room temperature for 10 min with 2% paraformaldehyde. After washing with PBS, cells were blocked for 15 min with 1% BSA in PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100, then incubated with primary mouse anti-human ECP Ab (2 µg/ml) for 1 h, washed extensively, and stained for 30 min with secondary FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG Ab (1:100). After extensive washing, coverslips were mounted on the slides using mounting medium (10% PBS, 90% glycerol). Immunostained cells were observed and photographed using a Nikon EFD-3 microscope (Nikon-IZASA). In negative controls, the primary Ab was not added.
Western blotting analysis
Cells (107, cultured at a density of 6.6 x 106/ml) were pelleted, lysed in 50 µl of ice-cold lysis buffer A (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.9), 10 mM EDTA, 50 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.1% SDS, and the following protease-inhibitor mixture: 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor, 10 µg/ml N-tosyl-L-phenylalanyl-chloromethyl ketone, 10 µg/ml captopril, 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM benzamidine, and 10 mM iodoacetamide), and vortexed for 10 s following sonication for 10 s; insoluble material was pelleted by centrifugation at 15,000 x g for 2 min. The supernatants were used for protein measurement. Proteins (80 µg/lane) were separated on 15% polyacrylamide-SDS gels under reducing conditions, and electrophoretically transferred to PVDF membranes using a semidry device. Membranes were probed without need of prior blocking (45) with anti-human ECP Ab (1:500), at room temperature for 2 h, in PBS containing 1% BSA and 0.2% Tween 20. Next, membranes were washed with PBS, and incubated at room temperature for 30 min with horse anti-mouse IgG Ab linked to HRP (1:5000). After washing with PBS, immunoreactive bands were visualized by ECL (46). Reprobing of blots with anti-human
-actin Ab was conducted to verify even protein loading throughout lanes.
Dissociation of neutrophil-bound Igs
Ig molecules were dissociated from the surface of neutrophils as described previously (39, 40). Briefly, after isolation, neutrophils were resuspended in 1 ml acetate buffer (50 mM sodium acetate (pH 4), 85 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, supplemented with 0.03% human serum albumin) and incubated on ice for 3 min. An equal volume of gelatin veronal buffer (1.8 mM sodium barbital, 3.1 mM barbituric acid, 0.1% gelatin, 0.05 mM MgCl2, 141 mM NaCl, 0.15 mM CaCl2 (pH 7.4)) was then added to the treated cells, and the mixture was centrifuged at 500 x g for 10 min. After the treatment, neutrophils were cultured with the different agents.
RNA extraction and RT-PCR analysis
Total RNA from 2 x 107 highly purified neutrophils or eosinophils (cultured at a density of 6.6 x 106/ml) was isolated using the guanidine phenol method (47). Total RNA (1 µg) was reverse transcribed into cDNA using random primers. The first-strand cDNA was amplified with primer sets for human ECP (accession number: X55990): 5'-GCACATCAGTCTGAACCCCCCTCG-3' and 5'-TAGAACCTCCTTCCTGGTCTGTCT-3', GAPDH (accession number: J04038): 5'-CCACCCATGGCAAATTCCATGGCA-3' and 5'-TCTAGACGGCAGGTCAGGTCCACC-3', Charcot-Leyden crystal protein (CLC) (accession number: NM_001828): 5'-AGGAGACAACAATGTCCCTG-3' and 5'-TCACAGCCTCAGGCTTGATT-3'. The reaction was performed by 40 cycles each of 94°C for 1 min, 60°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min. The PCR products were electrophoresed through agarose gels, and bands were visualized by ethidium bromide staining (ECP: 280 bp, GAPDH: 600 bp, CLC: 373 bp).
De novo synthesis of ECP
Cells (2 x 107, cultured at a density of 6.6 x 106/ml) were cultured in methionine- and cysteine-free medium (RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% (v/v) dialyzed FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin) supplemented with 250 µCi/ml [35S]methionine and [35S]cysteine (35Izolabel 35S). Cells were incubated for 18 h, at 37°C, in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% O2. Following incubation, cells were harvested and centrifuged (12,000 x g for 10 min, at 4°C), and cell culture supernatants were collected and kept at –80°C. Pelleted cells were lysed in 1 ml of cold buffer (50 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 10 mM EGTA, 50 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 2 mM sodium orthovanadate, 100 µM phenylarsine oxide, and the following protease-inhibitor mixture: 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor, 10 µg/ml N-tosyl-L-phenylalanyl-chloromethyl ketone, 10 µg/ml captopril, 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM benzamidine, and 10 mM iodoacetamide). After 10 min, cells were vortexed for 10 s, sonicated for 10 s, and centrifuged at 12,000 x g for 2 min at 4°C. The supernatants obtained after that centrifugation constituted whole cell extracts. Whole cell extracts (1 ml
1 mg) and cell culture supernatants previously obtained (1 ml) were incubated with 2 µg/ml anti-human ECP Ab for 18 h, at 4°C, and then with 75 µl of IgG-coupled protein G-Sepharose for 4 h at 4°C. Next, Sepharose was pelleted, and washed twice with 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) containing the previous protease-mixture inhibitor. Immunoprecipitated proteins were subjected to SDS-PAGE by boiling the Sepharose particles in Laemmli sample buffer, on 15% polyacrylamide gels under reducing conditions. Following electrophoresis, the gels were dried, mounted on Kodak X-Omat AR films with an intensifying screen, and exposed for 1–5 days at –80°C.
Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as means ± SEM. A Student t test or one-way ANOVA was used to make comparisons between groups. A level of p < 0.05 was considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The potential ability to release ECP was evaluated in highly purified neutrophils and eosinophils from allergic asthmatic patients. For this, the cells were cultured in the presence of Ags to which the patients were sensitized, or of agonists, including PAF and LPS, and the release of ECP was measured in the cell culture supernatant by ELISA. As is shown in Fig. 1A, the treatment with Ags and/or PAF induced a time-dependent ECP release by neutrophils, but not by eosinophils (Fig. 1B). In contrast, LPS induced a time-dependent ECP release only by eosinophils (Fig. 1B).
|
Because it has been reported that eosinophils and basophils (48, 49, 50, 51, 52), but not neutrophils, can express CLC, we additionally analyzed, by RT-PCR, the expression of its transcript, and thereby excluded a possible eosinophil and basophil contamination in our preparations. As is shown in Fig. 1C, no C-L mRNA was detected in any neutrophil sample, whereas CLC expression was found in the eosinophil sample examined. Fig. 2A illustrates a dose-dependent ECP release after challenge of neutrophils for 18 h with different doses of the specific Ags to which the donor was sensitized. As is also shown, the maximal level of ECP release was attained after treatment with 10 µg/ml Ag.
|
Role of IgE in ECP release by human neutrophils
We have previously reported the ability of neutrophils from allergic patients to bind Ag-specific IgE on their cell surface (39, 40). In this regard, we further investigated the participation of IgE in Ag-induced ECP release. First, we studied whether anti-human IgE Ab treatment could mimic the effect observed with Ags. Fig. 3 shows that anti-IgE Ab, like Ags, induced ECP release in a time- (Fig. 3A) and dose- (Fig. 3B) dependent manner, with a maximal production at 18 h, at 10 µg/ml anti-IgE Ab. An additive effect similar to that with Ags was observed in the presence of PAF (Fig. 3A). In no case was ECP release found when neutrophils from allergic patients were treated with nonspecific goat IgG Ab. In addition, goat IgG did not affect the PAF-dependent ECP release by neutrophils. Furthermore, when neutrophils from allergic patients were cultured with anti-IgG Abs, no ECP release was detected (Fig. 3A). Moreover, ECP release was not detected when IgE molecules were stripped from the neutrophil surface before the Ag challenge (39) (Fig. 3C).
|
RI, Fc
RII/CD23, and
BP/mac-2/galectin-3) has previously been reported in neutrophils (32, 33, 34, 35, 36). The next experiments were performed to identify the types of IgE receptor/IgE-binding molecule involved in IgE-dependent ECP release. Fig. 4A illustrates a higher ECP release by neutrophils from an allergic patient, incubated with CRA1 Ab (directed against the Fc
RI
-chain), compared with neutrophils treated with A3A12 Ab (directed against galectin-3). However, when neutrophils were challenged with 9P.25 Ab (directed against Fc
RII/CD23), the amount of ECP released was similar to that in the case of unstimulated cells. In no case was ECP release found when neutrophils from allergic donors were treated with nonspecific mouse IgG1 Ab. In contrast to neutrophils, eosinophils responded only to the treatment with LPS (Fig. 4B). Galectin-3 activity is affected by lactose, which is a saccharide ligand recognized by galectin-3 (53). To further confirm the involvement of this IgE-binding protein in IgE-dependent ECP release by human neutrophils, experiments were next done to clarify whether lactose could inhibit the Ag-dependent ECP release. Fig. 4C shows a partial inhibition of Ag-dependent ECP release by lactose, while preincubation with glucose did not affect the Ag-dependent ECP release.
|
Additional experiments were performed to analyze whether, in addition to releasing ECP, human neutrophils were able to express ECP protein. To this end, we studied the intracellular ECP expression in human neutrophils. After two-color flow cytometry analysis, we detected that a low number of nonstimulated neutrophils (CD66b+ cells) displayed intracellular ECP expression (Fig. 5A). However, this expression was clearly enhanced after 18 h of incubation with Ag to which the patient was sensitized, anti-IgE Ab, and PAF. As is shown, PAF additively enhanced the effect of Ag and anti-IgE Ab. Further analysis performed using immunofluorescence staining yielded similar results (Fig. 5B). Additional analysis by Western blotting (Fig. 5C) showed that ECP protein was only weakly detected in untreated cells; however, ECP was detected after challenge with anti-IgE Ab, PAF, or PAF plus anti-IgE Ab. In no case was ECP expression found when neutrophils from allergic donors were treated with nonspecific goat IgG Ab or anti-IgG Ab. In addition, goat IgG did not affect the PAF-dependent ECP expression by neutrophils.
|
Although the presence of ECP protein has previously been found in neutrophils (11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18), its mRNA expression has never been detected in these cells. Therefore, we next studied the observed effects of anti-IgE Ab, Ags, and PAF upon ECP expression at mRNA levels, using RT-PCR. Because RT-PCR is a very sensitive method, it was important to isolate RNA from extremely pure cells to avoid false-positive results. Neutrophil and eosinophil populations were close to 100% purity (see Materials and Methods). Fig. 6 shows the absence of ECP mRNA in unstimulated neutrophils (Fig. 6A) and its presence in unstimulated eosinophils (Fig. 6B). Bands of amplification product corresponding to ECP were present in neutrophils stimulated with PAF, anti-IgE alone, or anti-IgE Ab together with PAF (Fig. 6A). Unspecific goat IgG was taken as negative control, and did not exert any effect on ECP mRNA levels (Fig. 6A). mRNA amplification of the CLC was also assayed to exclude eosinophil and basophil contamination (48, 49, 50, 51, 52) (Fig. 6C).
|
For further confirmation, in addition to the presence of ECP in human neutrophils, ECP de novo synthesis was analyzed in these cells. Human neutrophils were cultured with anti-IgE Ab plus PAF for 20 h in a medium containing [35S]methionine and [35S]cysteine. Then, cellular lysates or supernatants were immunoprecipitated using a mAb against ECP. Results presented in Fig. 7 show that treatment of neutrophils with these agents induced de novo synthesis of ECP. In addition, ECP synthesis was detected in both cellular lysates and cell culture supernatants, indicating that ECP release, at least in part, was originated in de novo synthesis of the protein.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The results described here provide the first evidence of a new mechanism of ECP induction in human neutrophils. This mechanism, elicited by Ags, was highly specific. In this context, Ags other than those which produce clinical symptoms did not evoke ECP production, and were ineffective in healthy donors. Presumably, the Ag-mediated effect occurred in an IgE-dependent manner. This hypothesis is supported by four main facts: 1) we have previously described the presence of specific IgE on the surface of neutrophils from allergic patients (39, 40); 2) anti-IgE Ab challenge triggered an equivalent response to that obtained with the Ags, and this response was not detected after IgE stripping from the cell surface; 3) anti-IgG Ab challenge did not induce ECP expression or release by human neutrophils; and 4) ligation of Fc
RI and galectin-3 with specific Ab evoked an ECP release.
In line with our results, IL-8 liberation by these cells following stimulation with anti-Fc
RI Ab has been reported previously (32); moreover, galectin-3 stimulates superoxide production (36). Although anti-Fc
RII/CD23 Ab failed to induce ECP, we have previously reported that activation of neutrophils through this receptor down-modulated L-selectin from their surface (41). The involvement of galectin-3 in the allergen-induced release of ECP was demonstrated by the fact that preincubation of neutrophils with lactose, but not with glucose, abolished the ECP release by allergens (Fig. 4C).
Our results are exclusively due to neutrophils, and cannot be ascribed to a possible contamination by eosinophils for several reasons: 1) the two cell types had a different course of ECP release. As previously described (44, 54), eosinophils released ECP after 30 min of cell stimulation; neutrophils released protein only after 3–18 h. 2) In agreement with previous reports (54, 55), PAF failed to induce ECP release by eosinophils, whereas it induced ECP release by neutrophils. 3) LPS induced ECP release from eosinophils (44), which is in agreement with our results, but not from neutrophils. 4) Ag-, anti-IgE-, anti-IgE plus PAF-, anti-Fc
RI-, and anti-galectin-3-dependent ECP production was observed in neutrophils, but not in eosinophils. In this regard, previous report have shown an absence of IgE-dependent ECP release from human eosinophils (8, 9, 10). 5) ECP mRNA was detected in unstimulated eosinophils (54), but not in unstimulated neutrophils. 6) CD66b is a specific marker for neutrophils (56) and we found that these cells (CD66b+) are in fact highly expressing ECP. 7) Finally, CLC is a marker of eosinophils and basophils but not of neutrophils (48, 49, 50, 51, 52) and we did not find its transcript in our neutrophil preparations. These findings are greatly in support of no contamination of eosinophils and/or basophils in our neutrophil samples.
We have previously described an IgE-dependent mechanism releasing elastase (39) and lactoferrin (unpublished data from our laboratory) from human neutrophils. These neutrophil granule contents have been described as stimuli for eosinophil activation, including ECP release (57, 58). For this reason, it can be speculated that the neutrophil may be an eosinophil-regulatory cell in IgE-mediated hypersensitivity inflammation. Based on our experiments, we hypothesize that ECP released by neutrophils has a biological role in IgE-induced reactions. We are carrying out additional studies to verify this hypothesis.
| Disclosures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 This work was supported by grants from the Junta de Andalucia (Ayudas Grupos de Investigación), Fundación de la Sociedad Española de Alergia e Inmunología Clínica, Fundación Sanitaria Virgen Macarena, and Fundación Alergol, Spain. A.V. and P.C. were supported by fellowships from the Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología, and Fundación Alergol, Spain. R.E. is a recipient of a postdoctoral grant (Juan de la Cierva) (SAF2003-00200) from the Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia, Spain. J.M. is under the Programa de Intensificación de la Actividad Investigadora del Sistema Nacional de Salud. ![]()
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Javier Monteseirín, Servicio Regional de Inmunología y Alergia, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain, c/Asunción 27, 3° Izda. E-41011, Sevilla, Spain. E-mail address: fmonteserinm{at}meditex.es ![]()
3 J.M., A.V., and P.C. contributed equally to this work. ![]()
4 Abbreviations used in this paper: ECP, eosinophil cationic protein; PVDF, polyvinylidene difluoride; CLC, Charcot-Leyden crystal protein; PAF, platelet-activating factor. ![]()
Received for publication October 27, 2006. Accepted for publication June 4, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
RII) of eosinophils, platelets, and macrophages. J. Exp. Med. 164: 72-89.
BP) expressed by human eosinophils. Implication in IgE-dependent eosinophil cytotoxicity. Eur. J. Immunol. 23: 3230-3235. [Medline]
RII induce eosinophil degranulation. J. Clin. Invest. 95: 2813-2821. [Medline]
, IL-1
, TNF-
, or neutrophils. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 106: 307-312. [Medline]
RI): role in asthma. FASEB J. 5: 940-949.
RII/CD23 expression on normal human polymorphonuclear neutrophils. Int. Immunol. 8: 479-490.
RII/CD23 on human neutrophils isolated from rheumatoid arthritis patients. Inflammation 23: 471-479. [Medline]
BP) of the S-type lectin family: role in IgE-dependent activation. J. Exp. Med. 117: 243-248.
BP/Mac2), stimulates superoxide production by neutrophils. J. Immunol. 154: 3479-3487. [Abstract]
B DNA binding. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 93-100. This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J Monteseirin and A Vega Eosinophil cationic protein is not only a distinctive eosinophil proteinAuthors' reply Thorax, February 1, 2008; 63(2): 185 - 185. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y Qiu and P K Jeffery Authors' reply Thorax, February 1, 2008; 63(2): 185 - 185. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Harder, R. Glaser, and J.-M. Schroder Review: Human antimicrobial proteins effectors of innate immunity Innate Immunity, December 1, 2007; 13(6): 317 - 338. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |