|
|
||||||||





* Division of Clinical Onco-Immunology, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland;
Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research, Epalinges, Switzerland;
Vaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892;
Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Department of Immunology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; and
¶ Multidisciplinary Oncology Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The CD8+ T cell responses to primary virus infections are characterized by large expansions of activated T cell clones bearing particular TCRs (4). In humans, highly restricted TCR usage has been described in several viral systems, including influenza (5, 6), EBV (7, 8), CMV (9), and HIV-1 (10, 11, 12). Thus, the limited TCR diversity seems to be a conserved feature of CD8+ T cell responses to viral infection. Our group recently identified a naturally primed T cell clone that dominated the human CD8+ T cell response to the Melan-A/MART-1 tumor Ag (13). Taken together, our data and those reported by others (reviewed in Ref. 14) indicate that similar to T cell responses against immunodominant viral Ags, selection and amplification of tumor-specific T cell clones occurs in cancer patients.
Long-term persistence of clonally restricted CD8+ T cell expansions has been observed in chronic viral infections such as EBV (15, 16), HSV (17), or HIV (11, 18, 19). In line with these studies, individual T cell clonotypes expressing high avidity TCRs to cognate tumor Ag were detected in melanoma patients with favorable disease outcome (20), as well as in a patient vaccinated repeatedly with Melan-A26–35 peptide mixed with IFA and CpG 7909 over extended periods of time (13). Despite major progress in the analysis of Ag-specific T cells, however, in vivo TCR repertoire evolutions in response to chronic antigenic exposure, e.g., in viral infection (EBV, HIV) or in the tumor-bearing state, remain largely unexplored. Furthermore, most of these studies provide limited information concerning the factors controlling turnover and persistence of particular T cell clonotypes. These questions are fundamental to our understanding of protective immunity and have important implications for vaccine design and development.
In the present study, we explored a natural tumor-specific immune response against the cancer testis Ag NY-ESO-1, subsequently boosted by peptide vaccination in a melanoma patient. To study and define the molecular evolution of epitope-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes, we used a novel ex vivo molecular-based approach at the single cell level (13). We identified nine distinct and codominant T cell clonotypes bearing BV1, BV8, or BV13 TCRs. Over a period of several years, we observed changes in frequencies of clonotypes with an expansion of BV13 T cells, and decrease and even disappearance of BV8 subpopulations. Clonotypic fluctuations were concomitant to vaccination with NY-ESO-1 analog peptide. We quantified differentiation, proliferative potential, and ability to produce effector mediators and cytokines. Because our analysis was performed on individual T cell clonotypes, it provides, for the first time, a detailed insight in factors associated with persistence and survival of tumor-specific T cell subpopulations.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Patient LAU 50, HLA-A*0201 positive, was diagnosed at the age of 62 years with primary skin melanoma of the right leg in January 1992. Breslow tumor thickness was 4.3 mm. In the following year he developed multiple skin metastases in the right leg and was treated with isolated limb perfusion with melphalan, TNF-
, and IFN-
. Five inguinal lymph nodes were removed and found tumor free. Two years later he developed a single inguinal lymph node metastasis, and inguinocrural lymph node dissection revealed that 13/14 nodes were tumor free. Eight years later (in November 2003) he had a contralateral metastasis (i.e., left inguinal), which was removed in January 2004 (–3 mo before the start of vaccination). Similar to the previous lesions, this metastasis expressed multiple tumor Ags, i.e., Melan-A, gp100, Tyr, Mage-1, Mage-3, Mage-10, Lage-1, NY-ESO-1, SSX-2, and SSX-4. Starting April 2004 (D0), the patient was enrolled in the Ludwig Institute vaccination trial LUD 01-003 (21) and received 12 monthly s.c. vaccines (until +13 mo) composed of 3 x 500 mg of peptide (NY-ESO-1157–165 SLLMWITQA C165A analog, Mage-A10254–262 GLYDGMEHL and Melan-A26–35 ELAGIGILTV A27L analog), emulsified in 1 ml of Montanide ISA-51, prepared altogether in one syringe as a stable emulsion (2-ml injection volume). Peptides were provided by ClinAlfa, MerckBiosciences, Läufelfingen, Switzerland, and adjuvant IFA; Montanide ISA-51 was provided by Seppic. Increased frequencies of Mage-A10 Ag-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes were observed in patient LAU 50 upon vaccination, with values reaching up 0.16% of CD8+ T cells (21). Future studies involve the molecular characterization of such tumor-specific T cells. In July 2004, one metastatic node in the right calf had regressed and was no longer detectable by radiological imaging and positron-emission tomography. The patient was thus in complete remission and remained so during the study, until 18 mo later (September 2005) when several new metastases developed in the right lower limb. All studies have been reviewed and approved by an appropriate institutional review committee.
A2/peptide multimers and flow cytometry immunofluorescence analysis
PBMCs were obtained by density centrifugation using Ficoll-Hypaque (Pharmacia Biotech) and cryopreserved in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 40% FCS and 10% DMSO (1 x 107–4 x 107 cells per vial). Synthesis of PE- and allophycocyanin-labeled HLA-A*0201/peptide multimers were prepared as described previously (2, 3) with NY-ESO-1 analog peptide SLLMWITQA. Five color stains were done with PE- or allophycocyanin-HLA-A2/peptide multimers, FITC-conjugated anti-CD28, -CD27, -CD57, and -programmed death (PD)-1 (BD Biosciences), PE-conjugated anti-TCR BV8 and BV13 (Beckman Coulter) and anti-CD127 (BD Biosciences), PE-Texas Red-conjugated anti-CD45RA (Beckman Coulter), allophycocyanin/Cy7-conjugated anti-CD8 (BD Biosciences) reagents, and anti-CCR7 mAb (BD Biosciences) followed by allophycocyanin-conjugated goat anti-rat IgG Ab (Caltag Laboratories). In brief, CD8+ T lymphocytes were positively enriched from PBMCs using anti-CD8-coated magnetic microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec), resulting in >90% CD3+CD8+ lymphocytes. Cells were first stained with PE- or allophycocyanin-labeled multimers for 30 min at 4°C in PBS, 0.2% BSA, 50 µM EDTA, and then with appropriate Abs (30 min, 4°C). Intracellular content of granzyme B, perforin, and Ki-67 was measured in CD8+ T lymphocytes without previous stimulation. After staining with appropriate mAbs, cells were fixed for 20 min at room temperature in PBS containing 1% formaldehyde, 2% glucose, and 5 mM sodium azide. Fixation was followed by permeabilization with PBS/0.1% saponin (Fluka)/0.2% BSA/50 µM EDTA and staining with granzyme B-FITC (Hölzel Diagnostika), perforin-FITC mAbs (Alexis) or Ki-67-FITC (BD Biosciences), both for 20 min at room temperature. Cells were immediately analyzed on a BD Vantage or a LSRII flow cytometer using CellQuest software (BD Biosciences). KLRG1 expression was determined by Alexa 488-conjugated anti-KLRG1 mAb 13F12F2 (22).
cDNA amplification, TCR spectratyping, sequencing, and clonotyping
Five-cell aliquots were sorted with a FACSVantage SE machine directly into wells of 96 V-bottom plates. cDNA preparation, cDNA amplification, and PCR were performed as described (23). CDR3 size of TCR transcripts and the sequences of oligonucleotides corresponding to the 22 variable segments of the TCR
-chain (based on the nomenclature proposed by Arden et al. (24)) were analyzed as follows: in brief, 8 µl taken from 10 individually sorted and amplified 5-cell cDNA samples were pooled together to obtain total cDNA material equivalent to ex vivo sorted 50 cells. cDNA pools generated from circulating EM28+ and EM28– NY-ESO-1-specific T cells at different time points before and after vaccination as well as cDNA pools from NY-ESO-1-specific T cells sorted from single-cell suspension of a metastatic lymph node tissue (TILN)4 were subjected to individual PCR using a set of validated 5' sense fluorescent-labeled primers specific for the 22 BV subfamilies and one 3' antisense primer specific for the corresponding C gene segment (25). PCR products were then run on an automated sequencer in the presence of fluorescent size markers and data analysis was performed with the Genescan analysis software (Applied Biosystems). TCR BV-BC PCR products were directly purified and sequenced (Fasteris) when single dominant PCR peaks were identified. Two distinct sets of primers (Metabion) specific for the CDR3 region of each identified BV1, BV8, and BV13 T cell clonotype were validated and used for clonotyping PCR as recently described (13); 1) CDR3 clonotype forward and C
reverse, and 2) BV-subfamilies (BV1, BV8, or BV13) and CDR3 clonotype reverse. Forward and reverse clonotype primers are depicted as following; BV1 clonotype 1: 5'-AGCGTAACAGGGACAGGGG-3'; rev-5'-GCCCCCTGTCCCTGTTACG-3', BV1 clonotype 2: 5'-GTAGATGGAAGCAATCAGCC-3'; rev-5'-AAAATGCTGGGGCTGATTGC-3', BV8 clonotype 1: 5'-ACTTCTGTGCCAGCCAACAG-3'; rev-5'-AAAGCTTCAGTACCCCCCTG-3', BV8 clonotype 2: 5'-ACTTCTGTGCCAGCAGTCTC-3'; rev-5'-AAGCTTCAGTCCCCCCGAGA-3', BV8 clonotype 3: 5'-GTTTGGGGGGCAATGAGCAG-3'; rev-5'-GAACTGCTCATTGCCCCCCA-3', BV13 clonotype 1: 5'-GAACAGGGTTGGACGGCTAC-3'; rev-5'-GTAGCCGTCCAACCCTGTTC-3', BV13 clonotype 2: 5'-AGTTACGTAGGGGGGAAGG-3'; rev-5'-AGCCTTCCCCCCTACGTAA-3', and BV13 clonotype 3: 5'-GACACTATAATTCACCCCTCC-3'; rev-5'-GGAGGGGTGAATTATAGTGTC-3'.
Gene expression analysis
The procedures for cDNA preparation, cDNA amplification as well as the RT-PCR were recently described in detail (23). Primers to detect CD3, CCR7, IFN-
, granzyme B, perforin, CD94, and TNF-
mRNA transcripts were previously reported (26). Additional primers were used in the present study: CD127/IL-7R
: 5'-ATCTTGGCCTGTGTGTTATGG-3'; rev-5'-ATTCTTCTAGTTGCTGAGGAAACG-3', KLRG1: 5'-CTTGAGCCCAGGAGTTTGAG-3'; rev-5'-TGGTCTCCTTCATCACTGTACC-3'.
T cell cloning and culture
Multimer+ CD8+ T cell subsets (EM28+ and EM28–) were sorted by flow cytometry, cloned by limiting dilution, and expanded in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 8% human serum, 150 U/ml recombinant human IL-2 (rhIL-2; a gift from GlaxoSmithKline), 1 µg/ml PHA (Sodiag) and 1 x 106/ml irradiated allogeneic PBMC (3000 rad) as feeder cells.
Telomere fluorescence in situ hybridization and flow cytometry (flow FISH)
The average length of telomere repeats at chromosome ends in individual cells, was measured by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and flow cytometry (flow FISH) as previously reported (27, 28). Telomere length measurements were performed on 45 in vitro derived T cell clones sorted from EM28– NY-ESO-1-specific T subpopulations at various time points before and following immunotherapy, allowing the recovery of sufficient numbers of cells for flow FISH analysis. All T cell clones were expanded in identical in vitro culture conditions, and after a single round of stimulation, 2 x 105 cells were further processed by flow FISH. Because the average telomere fluorescence from all these clones was evaluated in the same experimental design, this allowed direct telomere comparison between each tested clone. We estimated that all clones had, on average, shortened their telomere lengths by
1.5 kb through their in vitro expansion round (29). Telomere fluorescence was calculated by subtracting the mean fluorescence of the background control (no probe) from the mean fluorescence obtained from cells hybridized with the telomere probe after calibration with FITC-labeled fluorescent beads (Quantum TM-24 Premixed; Bangs Laboratories) and conversion into molecules of equivalent soluble fluorochrome (MESF) units. The following equation was used to estimate the telomere length in base pair: bp = MESF x 0.495 (27).
LiveCount assay
Ex vivo lytic activity and Ag recognition was assessed as recently described (30) with some modifications. In brief, peptide-pulsed T2 cells (HLA-A2+/TAP–/–) were labeled with 0.1 µM CFSE (NY-ESO-1 peptide; T2-CFSElow) or with 2 µM CFSE (irrelevant peptide; T2-CFSEhigh). A 1/1 mixture of T2-CFSElow and T2-CFSEhigh was prepared. BV8+ and BV13+ NY-ESO-1-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes were sorted as described above, and increasing numbers of sorted cells (63, 125, 250, 500, 1000, and 2000) were dispensed into a plate containing the peptide-pulsed T2 cells (125 cells per peptide). The percentage of specific lysis was then calculated as described by Devevre et al. (30).
IFN-
Cytospot assay
Measurement of intracellular IFN-
production was combined to multimer, CD28 and CD45RA labeling. 1 x 106 CD8+ enriched T cells (Miltenyi Biotec) were incubated for 5 h with 1 x 106 T2 cells pulsed with 10 µg/ml irrelevant HIV-1 Pol476–484 (ILKEPVHGV) peptide, 10 µg/ml cognate peptide, or 1 µg/ml PMA/0.25 µg/ml ionomycin, respectively. After 1 h, 10 µg/ml brefeldin A (Sigma-Aldrich) was added. After 4 additional hours, cells were stained with multimers and Abs, fixed, permeabilized, and incubated with anti-IFN-
-FITC in PBS/0.1% saponin for 30 min at 4°C. Cells were analyzed on a LSRII flow cytometer using CellQuest software (BD Biosciences).
CFSE proliferation assay
We incubated 2 x 106 CFSE-labeled PBMCs per ml in the presence of 10 µg/ml cognate peptide in RPMI 1640 containing 10% human serum and 150 U/ml IL-2 for 5 days. After day 3, 4, and 5, we collected
2 x 106 cells and stained cells with multimers and Abs as described above. Cells were analyzed on a LSRII flow cytometer using CellQuest software (BD Biosciences).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Patient LAU 50 with advanced melanoma remained disease free for a period of 9 years before developing two new metastases, one of which was removed by surgery. Subsequently, the patient was enrolled in a vaccination trial and received monthly vaccinations with NY-ESO-1157–165 C165A analog peptide emulsified in IFA during 13 mo (21). During the first 3 mo of vaccination, the remaining metastasis regressed and was no longer detectable by radiological imaging and positron-emission tomography (see patients clinical history in Materials and Methods). Using fluorescent HLA-A2/peptide multimers incorporating peptide NY-ESO-1157–165 (thereafter NY-ESO-1 multimers), we identified a high frequency (>3%) of NY-ESO-1 multimer+ T cells that were already detectable in the circulating CD8+ compartment 8 mo before the relapse of disease (Fig. 1A). This population expanded up to 10% of CD8+ T cells during vaccination. Of note, the high frequency values of NY-ESO-1-specific T cells observed in this particular patient represent a rare exception, because in most HLA-A2+ individuals cancer testis Ag-specific T cells are not detectable ex vivo (31). Multicolor flow cytometry analysis revealed that NY-ESO-1-specific T lymphocytes predominantly bore a differentiated effector-memory phenotype (EM28–; CD45RA–CCR7–CD28–), which persisted for at least 18 mo following immunotherapy (Fig. 1B; data not shown). The majority of these cells expressed intracellular granzyme B and had down-regulated CD27. In contrast, a small but yet detectable proportion (
7%) of the effector memory compartment contained CD28+ cells (designed as EM28+).
|
-chain variable segment usage (BV) and CDR3 length heterogeneity as described recently (13). Primed EM28+ cells displayed large polyclonal TCR repertoires with a diverse usage of the 22 different BV families as well as high variability within CDR3 size products. In sharp contrast, EM28– T cells exhibited a restricted TCR repertoire diversity with the majority of cells using BV1, BV8, or BV13 gene segments of defined CDR3 lengths. These dominant TCRs were conserved over the period during which the patient received immunotherapy (0–18 mo). TCR sequencing revealed the presence of nine distinct clonotypes; three for each of the identified TCR-BV (Table I).
|
To gain insight into the kinetics of each distinct BV1, BV8, and BV13 T cell clonotype over time, we first examined the proportion of the different clonotypes among ex vivo purified EM28+ and EM28– NY-ESO-1-specific T cell subsets. To directly assess the presence or absence of particular clonotypes, we used a modified RT-PCR protocol that detects specific cDNAs after global amplification of expressed mRNAs from as few as five cells (23) and combined it with designed clonotypic primers (13). Transcript analysis revealed the presence of TCR-BV8 and -BV13 clonotypes 1 and 2 in the majority of the EM28+ and EM28– characterized 5-cell aliquots, and these represented the most abundant clonotypes (Fig. 1, D and E; data not shown). BV8-clono1 and BV8-clono2 were dominant within blood recovered 11 mo before vaccination. The ratio BV8:BV13 was reversed 18 mo after immunotherapy, with an increase in the proportion of 5-cell samples positive for BV13 TCR clonotypes. Most strikingly, we observed the complete disappearance of BV8-clono2 TCR at the latest time point.
Increased proportions of BV13 T cell clonotypes after vaccination
Our strategy combining ex vivo cell sorting with molecular analysis of 5-cell T lymphocytes provides the identification of specific T cell clonotypes as well as insight in TCR repertoire evolution over time. However, the 5-cell approach does not allow a precise estimate of T cell frequencies. Therefore, we generated 480 T cell clones derived by in vitro limiting dilution from circulating tumor-specific EM28+ and EM28– T cell subsets isolated at various time points. The TCR of each T cell clone was analyzed by sequencing and/or specific clonotypic PCR analysis. In agreement with the ex vivo 5-cell data, we found that over 50% of the EM28– NY-ESO-1-specific T cell clones were composed of TCR BV8 clonotypes before the start of immunotherapy, whereas BV13 and BV1 clonotypes, represented 28.6 and 7.6% of the repertoire, respectively (–11 mo; Fig. 2A). Following vaccination, the proportion of cells bearing the TCR BV13 clonotypes gradually increased to 42.5% before reaching up to
60% at 13 and 18 mo. In sharp contrast, the fraction of BV8-clonotypic T cell clones declined by 13 mo after treatment (23%), and we could no longer detect the BV8-clono2 at this time point (Table II). Similar shifts in the proportion of BV8 and BV13 clonotypes were found in the EM28+ subset (Fig. 2A; Table II). Moreover, the proportion of other and infrequent TCRs was greater within the latter subset (43–58%) than among the EM28– cells (5–10%). The proportions of NY-ESO-1-specific BV8 and BV13 T cell clonotypes 1 and 2 were calculated as percentages of circulating CD8+ T lymphocytes (Fig. 2B). A drastic increase in frequencies of both BV13-clono1 and BV13-clono2 T cells was observed during immunization, reaching up to 3.1 and 2.2%, respectively. In contrast, the proportion of BV8-clono1 and BV8-clono2 T cells diminished over time, which became particularly evident at 18 mo. Similar kinetics were observed when the proportion of individual BV8 and BV13 clonotypes was adjusted to the total counts of leukocytes (data not shown).
|
|
|
We next evaluated the TCR usage of NY-ESO-1-specific T cell subsets within a metastatic lymph node, resected 3 mo before the start of peptide vaccination (–3 mo). Most tumor-specific T cells exhibited the effector-memory CD45RA–CCR7– phenotype, with a dominant fraction of these cells that had down-regulated CD28 and CD27, and up-regulated granzyme B and perforin (Fig. 3A). As their counterparts in peripheral blood samples, TCR-BV diversity in the multimer-specific EM28– T cell subpopulation was limited with preferential presence of BV1-, BV8-, and BV13-expressing cells (Fig. 3B). Again, the TCR repertoire in the EM28low/+ fraction was more diverse than in the EM28– subset. We further investigated the proportion of each T cell clonotype by ex vivo sorting of 5-cell samples (Fig. 3C) and analysis of in vitro generated T cell clones (n = 70; Fig. 3D). All of the clonotypes identified within the circulating NY-ESO-1-specific CD8+ T cells were also found in the metastatic tissue. In contrast to the data obtained from peripheral blood (–11 mo; Fig. 2A), the BV13 clones were predominant in both EM28+ and EM28– T cell subpopulations, whereas BV8 T cell clonotypes were represented at reduced frequencies (Table II). This dominance was particularly marked within the EM28+ compartment. Altogether, these results provide molecular evidence that the prevalence for BV13 clonotypes observed within multimer-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes of a metastatic lymph node resected 3 mo before the start of vaccination (–3 mo) precedes the BV13>>BV8 ratio attained about 2 years later in the peripheral blood (+18 mo; Fig. 2A).
|
We next measured the turnover of distinct NY-ESO-1-specific T cell clonotypes before and after immunotherapy (Fig. 4A). Because telomeres progressively shorten as a function of cell division, telomere length is a powerful indicator of the in vivo replicative history of lymphocytes (27). We observed a drastic reduction in the mean telomere fluorescence of BV13 T cell clonotypes over time, that corresponded to a loss of
2.4 kb, indicating extensive in vivo proliferation. Telomere shortening seemed coincident with immunotherapy, because BV13 clonotypes from the metastatic lymph node (–3 mo) displayed similar average telomere lengths compared with the clones isolated from the earliest blood sample before vaccination (–11 mo). Despite its subsequent disappearance, the BV8-clono2 displayed the brightest telomere signal, and no telomere loss was observed within the BV8-clonotype 1 subpopulation over time. Altogether, our data indicate that several tumor-specific T cell clones may persist over extended periods of time in vivo, likely reflecting the repetitive triggering by Ag derived from tumor cells or vaccination. Others eventually disappear from the blood, but this is not associated with a state of replicative senescence.
|
and retain proliferative capacity upon antigenic stimulationThe finding of distinct kinetics among NY-ESO-1-specific BV subpopulations over time prompted us to assess their ex vivo cytolytic activity using a novel flow cytometry-based cytotoxic assay (30). As depicted in Fig. 4B, BV8+ and BV13+ NY-ESO-1-specific T lymphocytes efficiently and similarly killed NY-ESO-1-peptide pulsed T2 cells. These data are in agreement with chromium release assays performed with EM28– derived BV8+ and BV13+ T cell clones (n = 103), where we found similar efficiency by the different clonotypes to recognize NY-ESO-1 expressing autologous tumor cells and T2 cells labeled with titrated amounts of NY-ESO-1 peptides (Fig. 4C; data not shown). Efficiency of target cell lysis apparently remained stable over time, as we obtained similar results with clones of BV8 and BV13 T cell clonotypes 1 and 2 generated from blood samples retrieved before (–11 mo) or after (+18 mo) immunotherapy (Fig. 4C; data not shown).
We next investigated whether BV8 and BV13 T cell clonotypes differed in the expression of molecules involved in T cell effector, survival, or regulatory functions. A similar proportion of 5-cell samples containing ex vivo detectable IFN-
, TNF-
, granzyme B, perforin, and C-type killer cell lectin-like receptor CD94 transcripts, was found in both BV clonotypes (Fig. 5A; data not shown). These clones displayed a highly differentiated phenotype, because a majority of the cells expressed CD57 whereas having down-regulated CD127 (IL-7R
), CD27, and L-selectin (CD62-L) expression (Fig. 5B; data not shown). Moreover, BV8+ and BV13+ NY-ESO-1-specific T cells expressed similar levels of PD-1. Surprisingly, the number of samples positive for KLRG1 mRNA, another killer cell lectin-like receptor, was much higher in both BV13-1 and BV13-2 clonotypes than in BV8 clonotypes (Fig. 5A), correlating with the analysis of KLRG1 protein expression by FACS (Fig. 5B). Indeed, the majority of NY-ESO-1-specific BV13+ cells expressed KLRG1 (>80%), whereas only 15–20% of BV8 clonotypes expressed the protein. Similar profiles of PD-1 and KLRG1 protein expression were observed 8 mo after immunotherapy (data not shown).
|
after short-term antigenic challenge as well as after nonspecific PMA/ionomycin stimulation (Fig. 5C). As observed previously, most of the IFN-
-secreting cells stimulated by the cognate peptide were differentiated EM28– cells. Finally, we stimulated CFSE-labeled PBMC with IL-2 alone or IL-2 plus NY-ESO-1 peptide to determine the proliferative potential of NY-ESO-1-specific CD8+ T cells (Fig. 5D). We found an important fraction of EM28+ and EM28– Ag-specific T cells as well as of BV8+ and BV13+ Ag-specific T cells that divided in response to antigenic stimulation. This is in line with the small proportion of ex vivo NY-ESO-1-specific EM28+ and EM28– T cell clonotypes that expressed low, but readily detectable levels of Ki-67, indicating that cycling cells are present in both compartments (Fig. 6A). Collectively, our data show that tumor-specific EM28– BV8 and BV13 T cell clonotypes are composed of differentiated cells with strong and efficient effector properties, although retaining their proliferative potential.
|
but not of PD-1 by EM28+ T cells
We monitored CD27, granzyme B, perforin, CD127, PD-1, and KLRG1 expression in combination with CD28 (Fig. 6). An important fraction of tumor-specific EM28+ T cells expressed CD27 (87%) and CD127 (60–70%), whereas they expressed granzyme B (36%), perforin (27%), and PD-1 (20–30%) at much lower levels than EM28– cells (70–90%). In contrast, the same proportion of KLRG1+ cells was observed within EM28+ and EM28– compartments (
50%). Altogether, our data show that unlike tumor-specific EM28– T cells that are closely related to effector-type cells, the EM28+ Ag-specific cells share functional features with memory lymphocytes. As the latter subset contains all identified tumor-specific T cell clonotypes, it may potentially serve as a pool for clonotypic T cells that can differentiate, expand, and mediate effector functions when required. Finally, KLRG1 expression is associated with distinct tumor-specific CD8+ T cell clonotypes, rather than with their functional differentiation status.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We could identify two functionally distinct populations of multimer+ T cells. The major population making up to 90% of the cells displayed the hallmarks of highly differentiated and active effector T cells (Fig. 1). Indeed, beside down-regulating lymph node homing (CCR7 and CD62L) and costimulatory (CD28 and CD27) receptors, these repetitively stimulated T cells (also designated as EM28–) down-regulated IL-7R
(involved in prosurvival/homeostatic signals delivered by IL-7) while up-regulating NK-like receptors such as CD57 and CD94, as well as PD-1, an inhibitory receptor. This dominant subset was mostly composed of nine expanded T cell clonotypes incorporating variable TCR-BV domains from only three subfamilies (BV1, BV8 and BV13). The other relatively minor population (EM28+), representing between 5 and 10% of the NY-ESO-1-reactive CD8+ T lymphocytes, was also differentiated with features consistent with a resting memory state (CD28+CD27+CD127+PD-1–granzymeB–perforin–) (26, 33, 34). The 9:1 ratio between these two subsets prevailed over the entire observation period.
A remarkably and somewhat surprising finding was that all NY-ESO-1-specific T cell clonotypes were found to be present within the tiny memory multimer+ T cell population, despite their otherwise large TCR heterogeneity (Fig. 2). Thus, our results indicate that such population serves as a reservoir for clonal expansion of tumor-reactive dominant effector T cell responses with efficient effector properties. This view is supported by two recent studies reporting that murine TCR repertoires of both central-memory (CM; CD62Lhigh) and effector-memory (EM; CD62Llow) Ag-specific CD8+ T cells were largely overlapping (35, 36). Kedzierska and coworkers (36) also showed that the memory CD62Lhigh T cell repertoire was more diverse, thus preserving clonal diversity, and proposed that the "best-fit" TCRs were selected from the CM subset into the EM subset. The very limited human data published so far indicated that T cell clonotypes can indeed be shared by CM and EM cells (37), but more studies are necessary to precisely describe human T cell differentiation at the clonotypic level.
Another major finding is that at least three of the dominant BV1, BV8, and BV13 T cell clonotypes displayed long-term in vivo persistence for up to 6 years (38). This is consistent with the capacity of the NY-ESO-1-specific EM28+ and EM28– T cells to proliferate when exposed to cognate Ag (Fig. 5). However, despite long-term persistence, we observed a progressive shift in the proportion of dominant clonotypes with an increase in BV13 T cells, whereas BV8 populations declined over time in vivo (Fig. 2). Such changes were coincident with repeated peptide vaccination and with a 2-fold expansion of the multimer+ population. Fluctuations in the TCR repertoire of Ag-specific CD8+ T cell populations have also been reported during primary HIV infection (39), in HIV infected individuals with partial control of viremia (19), as well as in an healthy subject during the first year of EBV infection (40). Whether the decline in frequency of particular T cell clones is permanent or whether it represents a temporary or random fluctuation of the TCR repertoire remains still unclear, and deserves further in-depth analyses.
Our data revealed that the BV8-clonotype 2 cell subpopulation was undetectable at the latest time point analyzed (+18 mo), despite displaying relatively long average telomere lengths (Fig. 4). This indicates that the differential evolution observed between BV8 and BV13 T cell clonotypes cannot be attributed to replicative senescence due to the presence of critically short telomeres (27). Moreover, we found a rapid loss of telomere length within these clonotypes, corresponding to a 20-fold increased turnover rate when compared with average telomere shortening in total CD8+ T cells associated with aging (28), The results reported here support the view that the loss of the BV8 clonotype 2 is likely due to dilution upon clonal expansion of the BV13 clonotypes. However, one cannot formally exclude that the progressive deletion of BV8 T cell clonotypes is associated with activation-induced cell death following repetitive triggering by Ag derived from tumor cells or vaccination. Because apoptosis is rapidly induced upon TCR triggering, this question remains difficult to assess experimentally, because MHC-peptide-multimers are required to study T cells in the context of natural TCR repertoires, but multimers trigger TCRs and thus promote apoptosis. Intriguingly, the BV13:BV8 ratio attained by the end of the observation period in the circulating lymphocyte compartment (+18 mo) was already present in the NY-ESO-1-specific T cell population isolated from a tumor infiltrated lymph node resected 21 mo earlier, at a time predating the instauration of therapeutic vaccination (Fig. 3). Due to the low frequencies of circulating EM28+ Ag-specific T cells, we were unable to assess the telomere lengths of such cells. Future work involving the careful evaluation of their replicative history combined to their cell cycle status are needed to fully elucidate the role of EM28+ cells in CD8+ T cell differentiation, eventually leading to the generation of differentiated EM28– cells.
One question raised by our data concerns the biological parameters that may trigger the preferential selection of BV13 T cell clonotypes over time. The avidity of the TCR for MHC/peptide complexes is unlikely to be involved because the different BV8 and BV13 clonotypes recognized and killed autologous NY-ESO-1 tumor cells and peptide-pulsed T2 cells with similar functional avidity (Fig. 4; data not shown). In addition, immunotherapy had no detectable impact on the functional avidity of BV8 and BV13 T cell clonotypes, because the clones shared similar killing efficacy, whether the cells were retrieved before or after the start of peptide vaccination. High levels of KLRG1 expression were seen on chronically activated EBV- and CMV-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes, and to a lesser extent on T cells specific for influenza, a resolved infection without a latent stage (41, 42). In line with these results, we found that a significant proportion of NY-ESO-1-specific EM28+ and EM28– T lymphocytes expressed KLRG1 (Fig. 6). Moreover, the work reported here extends recent findings (41), that KLRG1+ CD8+ T cell population is heterogeneous, as it contains both differentiated (EM28–) and less differentiated (EM28+) cells. Our observations further indicate that KLRG1 expression is associated to distinct TCR-BV clonotypes (Fig. 5), regardless of their differentiation status. Although KLRG1 is expressed on T cells that have undergone a large number of cell divisions (43, 44), the function of this molecule has not been fully explored. Recently, Gründemann and coworkers (45) identified E-cadherin as a ligand for murine KLRG1, and proposed that its ligation by E-cadherin in healthy tissues may exert an inhibitory effect on primed T cells. In addition, mouse KLRG1 also binds to N- or R-cadherin (46), but ligand(s) for human KLGR1 have yet to be defined. Because in our tumor model, KLRG1 expression was preferentially observed on BV13-specific T cell clonotypes displaying increased in vivo cell turnover, another hypothesis is that KLRG1 downstream receptor signaling may be involved in promoting long-term survival of cells rather than their inhibition (47). Alternatively, KLRG1 expression is preferentially up-regulated in strongly proliferating clonotypes and may allow their specific inhibition by ligand-expressing tissues or melanoma cells.
Emerging findings suggest that the expression of PD-1 contributes to the functional impairment that characterizes T cells during chronic viral infections, because blocking the PD-1/PD-1L pathway enhances both proliferation and effector functions of "exhausted" T cells (48, 49, 50, 51). Intriguingly, these results do not exactly support those obtained here in which chronically expanded tumor-reactive T cells expressing PD-1 also retained their capacity to undergo proliferation, cytokine production, and cytotoxic activity. Both BV8 and BV13 NY-ESO-1-specific T cell clonotypes efficiently secreted effector mediators such as granzyme B and perforin and killed tumor cells when tested directly ex vivo in a LiveCount assay (Fig. 4). Moreover, an important proportion of EM28– NY-ESO-1-specific T cells were able to release IFN-
upon stimulation with cognate peptide. Ongoing studies on blood samples from patient LAU 444, who exhibited a persisting and dominant Melan-A-specific CD8+ T cell response (13) further emphasized the finding that PD-1 was preferentially expressed within the differentiated EM28– compartment, whereas IL-7R
expression was mostly found on EM28+ cells (data not shown). Collectively, our data strongly support the notion that circulating tumor-specific CD8+ T cell clonotypes not only share phenotypic features with that of differentiated cells but also exhibit functional characteristics similar to those of effective CTL specific for immunodominant viral Ags such as EBV or CMV (52). Whether PD-1 expression on tumor-reactive CTL may regulate such cells directly at the tumor site where melanoma cells, particularly in the presence of IFN-
, express the PD-1L surface molecule (53), remains unclear and deserves additional studies.
We recently reported that both the natural T cell triggering by endogenous Ags and subsequent vaccination preferentially promoted an endogenous T cell clonotype with relatively high TCR avidity and antitumor activity (13). In the present study, we found that all individual T cell clonotypes that were identified after the start of immunotherapy were already present within the NY-ESO-1-specific CD8+ T cell response several months to years before vaccination. Importantly, both EM28+ and EM28– compartments comprised the same T cell clonotypes, thus revealing a tight interplay of T cells in early and differentiated stages. These data suggest that effective therapeutic vaccination for cancer may only be accomplished in the presence of both memory (EM28+) and effector (EM28–) subsets of tumor-specific T cells and that multifactorial events determine the rise and fall of dominant clonotypes that contribute to dynamically sustain antitumor CD8+ T cell-mediated immunity.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Disclosures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 This study was sponsored and supported by the Swiss National Center of Competence in Research (NCCR) Molecular Oncology, the Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, the Cancer Research Institute, NY, the Swiss Cancer League/Oncosuisse Grant 01323-02-2003, and the Swiss National Science Foundation Grants 3200B0-107693 and 3100A0-105929. ![]()
2 L.D., M.B., D.S., and N.R. contributed equally to this work. ![]()
3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Nathalie Rufer, Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research, 155 ch. des Boveresses, Epalinges, Switzerland. E-mail address: Nathalie.Rufer{at}isrec.ch ![]()
4 Abbreviations used in this paper: TILN, tumor-infiltrated lymph node cells; PD, programmed death; int, intermediate; EM, effector-memory; CM, central-memory. ![]()
Received for publication March 26, 2007. Accepted for publication May 30, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and
chains of the human T-cell antigen receptor recognizing HLA-A2 and influenza A matrix peptide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88: 8987-8990.
17 gene segment. J. Exp. Med. 181: 79-91.
usage during the primary immune response to HIV. Nature 370: 463-467. [Medline]This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. M. Iancu, P. Corthesy, P. Baumgaertner, E. Devevre, V. Voelter, P. Romero, D. E. Speiser, and N. Rufer Clonotype Selection and Composition of Human CD8 T Cells Specific for Persistent Herpes Viruses Varies with Differentiation but Is Stable Over Time J. Immunol., July 1, 2009; 183(1): 319 - 331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Touvrey, L. Derre, E. Devevre, P. Corthesy, P. Romero, N. Rufer, and D. E. Speiser Dominant Human CD8 T Cell Clonotypes Persist Simultaneously as Memory and Effector Cells in Memory Phase J. Immunol., June 1, 2009; 182(11): 6718 - 6726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. K. Ramalingam, D. Meyer-Olson, N. H. Shoukry, D. G. Bowen, C. M. Walker, and S. A. Kalams Kinetic Analysis by Real-Time PCR of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV)-Specific T Cells in Peripheral Blood and Liver after Challenge with HCV J. Virol., November 1, 2008; 82(21): 10487 - 10492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Derre, M. Bruyninx, P. Baumgaertner, M. Ferber, D. Schmid, A. Leimgruber, V. Zoete, P. Romero, O. Michielin, D. E. Speiser, et al. Distinct sets of {alpha}{beta} TCRs confer similar recognition of tumor antigen NY-ESO-1157-165 by interacting with its central Met/Trp residues PNAS, September 30, 2008; 105(39): 15010 - 15015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |