|
|
||||||||

* Division of Molecular Immunology, La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, La Jolla, CA 92037; and
Integrated Department of Immunology, National Jewish Medical and Research Center, Denver, CO 80206
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-herpesvirus that causes life-long, species-specific infection in vertebrate hosts. HCMV infection in humans is generally asymptomatic in healthy individuals, but results in multiorgan disease in the immunologically immature (e.g., congenital infection), and in the immune compromised (e.g., organ transplant recipients and AIDS patients) (1). A critical role for CD8 T cells in the control of HCMV is suggested by the correlation between virus reactivation in immune-compromised patients and defective CD8 T cell responses (2, 3). Moreover, transfer of HCMV-specific CD8 T cells can protect immune-suppressed individuals from virus reactivation (4, 5, 6). However, despite the efficacy of this treatment, it is not widely adopted due to extensive technical and financial demands of ex vivo cell culture. Another important aspect of HCMV-specific T cell responses is the unusually high frequency of virus-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells in healthy seropositive individuals (7). This expansion of cells increases with age (8) and is associated with defective T cell responses to heterologous Ags (9, 10), suggesting that HCMV infection may impair protective immunity to other pathogens.
Mouse CMV (MCMV) serves as a useful model to investigate the mechanisms controlling T cell responses to a viral pathogen with latent and persistent properties. After resolution of the primary infection, CD8 T cells control virus reactivation from latency (11), whereas CD4 T cells control persistent virus replication in the salivary gland (12). Similar to HCMV, MCMV-specific memory CD8 T cells expand to very high frequencies as infection progresses (13, 14), and transfer of either primary effector or memory CD8 T cells from MCMV immune donors can inhibit virus replication and disease in immune-suppressed recipients (15, 16, 17, 18).
Although a role of CD8 T cells in controlling MCMV infection is established, the mechanisms that regulate expansion of MCMV-specific CD8 T cells and maintenance of the pool of memory T cells are poorly understood. In particular, the role of cosignaling pathways that operate during Ag recognition that determine expansion of effector cells and memory development have not been investigated. The TNFR superfamily member OX40 (CD134) is an inducible cosignaling molecule expressed by T cells (19, 20, 21). OX40 was initially described as a costimulatory receptor for CD4 T cells regulating primary and memory responses (19, 20, 22, 23, 24). In contrast, early reports using OX40- and OX40 ligand (OX40L)-deficient mice indicated that OX40 was dispensable for primary CD8 T cell responses to influenza virus, lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV), vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV), and Theilers murine encephalomyelitis virus (25, 26, 27). However, more recently, in response to rechallenge with influenza infection (28), CD8 T cell priming was found to be impaired in the absence of OX40-OX40L interactions. Furthermore, CD8 T cell responses were also impaired when OX40 was targeted in mouse models of contact hypersensitivity (26) and reaction to tissue allografts (29), and OX40 was shown to directly signal CD8 T cells and control primary (30, 31) and secondary CD8 T cell responses (32) to Ag presented in adjuvant, in adenoviral vectors, or expressed by tumors cells.
We now report a critical role for the OX40 cosignaling pathway in the regulation of MCMV-specific CD8 T cells during the persistent phase of virus replication. Using genetic and pharmacological approaches, we demonstrated that OX40 signaling promoted accumulation of MCMV-specific CD8 T cell populations after the acute phase of infection and this required the participation of CD4 T cells. By contrast, activation of the OX40 cosignaling pathway induced a massive expansion of MCMV-specific CD8 T cells during the initial infection, independent of CD4 T cells. These findings substantiate the role of OX40 in regulating CD8 T cell responses that are both independent and dependent on CD4 T cells and provide insight into the mechanisms that regulate the expansion and survival of MCMV-specific T cells in vivo.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Wild-type C57BL/6 (B6) mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory and MHC class II-deficient mice (33) were purchased from Taconic Farms. OX40–/– knockout mice (27) on the B6 background were bred in-house. All experiments were conducted following the guidelines of the La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunologys Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Virus, mouse infections, and treatments
MCMV Smith strain (American Type Culture Collection (ATCC)) was prepared in BALB/c salivary glands, and titered on 3T3 cells as described previously (34). Mice were infected i.p. with 5 x 104 PFU MCMV. Mice were injected at the time of infection with 100 µg of either rat IgG (Chemicon International) or anti-OX40 (clone OX86 (35)). In other experiments, mice were irradiated (700 rad), infected i.p. with 5 x 103 PFU of MCMV and injected i.v. with 1 x 105 CD8+ T cells purified from spleens of MCMV-infected mice (8 days postinfection) by MACS separation, according to manufacturers instructions (Miltenyi Biotec).
Intracellular cytokine staining and flow cytometry
To evaluate CD8 T cell responses, splenocytes were isolated from MCMV-infected mice and incubated at 5 x 106 cells/ml in the presence of 2 µg/ml brefeldin A (Sigma-Aldrich) and 2 µg/ml MCMV-derived peptides (Genemed Synthesis) for 5 h at 37°C. The peptides used were the H-2Db-restricted M45-derived peptide HGIRNASFI, and the H-2Kb-restricted peptides derived from the M38 (SSPPMFRVP), M57 (SCLEFWQRV), and m139 (TVYGFCLL) open reading frames, as previously described (36). Cells were then washed and incubated with Fc block (BD Pharmingen). Cells incubated with peptide (or medium-treated controls) were then surface stained with anti-CD8
-PE-Cy7. In some experiments, cells were also stained with anti-CD43-PE and anti-CD44-CyChrome or anti-CD122-FITC and anti-CD127-PE. For evaluation of CD4 T cell responsiveness, splenocytes were stimulated with 1 µg/ml anti-CD3 (clone 145-2C11) and 1 µg/ml anti-CD28 (clone 37.51; BD Pharmingen) for 5 h at 37°C in the presence of brefeldin A, and stained with anti-CD8
-PE-Cy7 and anti-CD4 Pacific Blue (all Abs purchased from BD Pharmingen). All cells were then fixed with 3% formalin, permeabilized with saponin buffer (PBS, 2% FCS, 0.05% sodium azide, and 0.5% saponin), and stained with anti-IFN-
-allophycocyanin (BD Pharmingen) and, in some experiments, with anti-IL-2-PE (eBioscience) or anti-human granzyme B-PE (Caltag Laboratories/Invitrogen Life Technologies). In other experiments, splenocytes were immediately stained with anti-CD8
-PE-Cy7, anti-CD4-Pacific Blue, and OX40-PE (Serotec). All data were acquired on an LSR II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and analyzed with FlowJo software.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MCMV-specific CD8 T cells were analyzed in virus-infected B6 mice by intracellular staining for IFN-
following ex vivo stimulation of splenocytes with class I MHC-restricted peptides derived from M38, M45, M57, and m139 proteins. Given the H-2-restricted nature of these peptides, only CD8 T cells are activated by this in vitro stimulation. The MCMV-reactive CD8 T cell populations analyzed represent
60% of the MCMV-specific CD8 T cell response during the initial infection (36). Similar to data reported previously (37), the initial T cell response at 7–8 days postinfection consisted primarily of M45-specific CD8 T cells (
6% of all CD8 T cells; Fig. 1, A and B). Significant populations of M57- and m139-specific cells were also detectable, with M38-reactive CD8 T cells present at the lowest frequency (<2% of CD8 T cells). However, during the persistent phase of infection (>30 days), the CD8 T cell response in the spleen shifted to being dominated by m139- and M38-specific CD8 T cells (
10% of all CD8 T cells,; Figs. 1, A and B, and 2). The progressive decrease in expression of CD43 (marker for primary effector cells), while retaining CD44, suggested that these cells transitioned over this time away from an effector state (Fig. 1C).
|
|
-expressing NK cells on days 3 and 7 postinfection were also comparable in wild-type and OX40–/– mice (data not shown). Furthermore, virus replication in the spleen and liver at these time points was also unaltered in the absence of OX40 (data not shown), similar to reports in mice infected with LCMV, VSV, influenza, and Theilers murine encephalomyelitis virus, where no major role for OX40 was found in the acute antiviral response (25, 26, 27).
In contrast, the OX40 deficiency led to a defect in the number of CD8 T cells responding to late dominant Ags, M38 or m139, detectable at 34 and, in the case of M38, 90 days postinfection (Fig. 2, C and D). Plotting peptide-specific CD8 T cells against time revealed reduced accumulation of the OX40–/– T cells specific for M38 and, to a lesser extent, m139 peptides (Fig. 2, E–H). The OX40 deficiency did not alter expression of IL7R
chain (CD127) or IL-15R
-chain (CD122) on virus-specific T cells, suggesting that impaired CD8 T cell responses in OX40–/– mice were not due to reduced responsiveness to IL-7 or IL-15 (Table I). Furthermore, wild-type and OX40–/– CD8 T cells expressed comparable levels of granzyme B, indicating that the absence of OX40 did not affect the cytolytic potential of these cells (Table I).
|
To determine whether OX40 regulated CD4 T cells that might promote MCMV-specific CD8 T cells, CD4 T cell responsiveness was determined in the early (acute) and late (chronic) phases of infection. The epitopes of MCMV recognized by CD4 T cells have not been described in B6 mice, but the numbers of virus-reactive CD4 T cells can be reliably estimated with a short-term cytokine expression assay that detects Ag-primed T cells using limiting anti-CD3 stimulation. In OX40–/– mice, significantly lower numbers of IFN-
- and IL-2-producing CD4 T cells were visualized 34 (Fig. 3B), but not 7 (Fig. 3A), days after MCMV infection. This data implied that the defect in M38- and m139-reactive CD8 T cell populations in OX40–/– mice might be related to a poor sustained CD4 T cell response. In line with this hypothesis, priming of M38- and m139-specific CD8 T cells was also partially impaired in MHC class II-deficient mice after 33 days of infection (Fig. 3C) approximating the defect found in OX40–/– mice.
|
Given that endogenous OX40 signaling augmented the frequency of persisting MCMV-specific CD8 T cells following development of the acute response, we hypothesized that targeting of OX40 with agonist Ab would enhance the accumulation and longevity of CD8 T cells, particularly reactive with M38 and m139 Ags that dominated the late phase of the infection. Administration of anti-OX40 at the time of infection strongly enhanced the numbers of IFN-
-expressing CD8 T cells at early (Fig. 4A) and late (Fig. 4B) time points, as detected following ex vivo stimulation with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28. Moreover, anti-OX40 also enhanced the accumulation of MCMV-reactive CD8 T cells during the early response (Fig. 4C), and promoted a pronounced accumulation of M38 and m139 CD8 T cell populations as late as 34 days after infection (Fig. 4D). When these responses were plotted over time, all populations expanded at about the same rate (Fig. 4, E–H), but OX40 signaling only affected the long-term persistence of M38- (Fig. 4G) and m139-(Fig. 4H) specific CD8 T cells. OX40 targeting did not appreciably maintain the M45- and M57-reactive cells (Fig. 4, E and F). By 90 days postinfection, all CD8 T cell populations were equivalent in anti-OX40-treated vs untreated mice. Anti-OX40 treatment had no effect on granzyme B expression during early infection (Fig. 4I). Furthermore, CD8 T cells derived 7 days after infection from anti-OX40-treated mice afforded comparable protection from virus replication following transfer into irradiated MCMV-infected recipients compared with CD8 T cells derived from control-treated MCMV-infected donors (Fig. 4J). These results indicate that the CD8 T cell frequency rather than the antiviral potential of these cells was the primary target of OX40 action. Collectively, these data imply that CD8 T cell populations that react to different MCMV epitopes are regulated in alternate manners. OX40 can participate in the response of M45- and M57-reactive cells but does not normally play a major role, whereas OX40 strongly influences M38- and m139-reactive cells after the acute phase of infection.
|
To determine whether CD4 T cells were required for the action of anti-OX40 in promoting MCMV-reactive CD8 T cell populations, MCMV-infected wild-type and MHC class II-deficient mice were treated with control Ig or anti-OX40. Expansion of CD8 T cells following OX40 targeting was associated with a dramatic increase in the number of CD4 T cells producing IFN-
and IL-2 at 7 (Fig. 5A) and 30 (Fig. 5B) days postinfection. By analyzing MCMV-infected wild-type and class II-deficient mice, we found that CD4 T cells were not required for the primary MCMV-specific CD8 T cell responses (Fig. 5C). Compared with wild-type controls in untreated mice, the numbers of MCMV-specific CD8 T cells at day 7 were equivalent or even increased in MHC class II–/– mice. Interestingly, anti-OX40-induced primary expansion of all CD8 T cell populations was not abrogated in MHC class II–/– mice and was equivalent to increases seen in wild-type mice (Fig. 5C).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MCMV-specific CD8 T cells varied in their responsiveness to OX40 stimulation. Whereas endogenous and exogenous OX40 stimulation promoted CD8 T cells reactive to M38 and m139 epitopes, only exogenous OX40 signals influenced the accumulation of CD8 T cells recognizing M45 and M57 peptides, and did not promote their long-term accumulation. Why these populations of CD8 T cells behave differently is not clear, but it is likely related to recognition or availability of the antigenic peptides over time. Thus, the early M45 and M57 responses might contract dramatically due to a lack of Ag recognition, perhaps because of inhibition of MHC class I expression by MCMV (38) or alternatively due to poor processing or availability of M45 and M57 proteins during the chronic phase of infection. This is supported by the finding that anti-OX40 enhanced and prolonged M38 and m139 responses, but could not prolong the M45 and M57 responses. Functional effects of OX40 signaling on T cells are likely dependent on concomitant TCR signals, in line with it being a costimulatory molecule, and hence in the absence of Ag recognition, OX40 signals might not be expected to rescue the decline of M45 and M57 anti-viral CD8 T cell populations.
Defective M38- and m139-specific CD8 T cell responses during chronic MCMV infection of OX40-deficient mice were associated with reduced late CD4 T cell activity. The similar defects in these CD8 T cell responses in OX40- and MHC class II-deficient mice further suggested that OX40 at least partially, if not wholly, promoted persistent CD8 T cell responses via sustaining CD4 T cells, and this hypothesis was substantiated by the finding that anti-OX40 could not mediate CD8 T cell persistence in MHC class II-deficient mice. OX40 signaling during the activation and priming of CD4 T cells in a number of model systems has been shown to promote clonal expansion, survival, and memory development (20, 39, 40), through targeting cell cycle and antiapoptotic molecules such as survivin, Bcl-xL, and Bcl-2 (21, 41). This is in line with the idea that endogenous OX40 signaling during the initial to late stages of acute MCMV infection influenced the persistence of virus-reactive CD4 T cells. Furthermore, although we only observed impaired CD4 T cell responses at later stages (day 34) of infection in OX40–/– mice, exogenous OX40 stimulation at the time of infection induced a massive expansion of IFN-
- and IL-2-producing CD4 T cells during both acute and chronic phases of infection.
A role for CD4 T cells in mediating MCMV-specific CD8 T cell responses further adds to the literature suggesting that the requirement for CD4 T cells in CD8 T cell responses can vary depending on the nature of the Ag and context in which it is presented, and also the time at which responses are analyzed. In different models of CD8 T cell generation, CD4 T cells have been found to be required either during the priming and/or the maintenance of memory CD8 T cell populations (42, 43, 44, 45), although a growing number of reports are highlighting that it is long-term CD8 responses that are most dependent on CD4 T cells. With all MCMV-specific populations, we found that their initial generation was not affected by the absence of CD4 T cells in line with data assessing the induction of primary CD8 T cells to other viral infections (46). In contrast, the persistence of M38 and m139-specific populations after the acute response was influenced by the presence of CD4 T cells, raising parallels with other data in a model of chronic LCMV infection where depletion of CD4 T cells induced a strong decrease in CTL activity when assessed at 5 mo (47).
Given that our data indicates that both OX40 and CD4 T cells can strongly influence the early persistence of MCMV-specific CD8 T cell populations after the acute response, it will be interesting to determine in future studies whether similar regulation takes place in HCMV-infected individuals many months to years after initial infection. OX40 signaling can strongly enhance the clonal expansion of memory CD4 T cells following re-exposure to Ag (48) and has been suggested in some cases to play a role in reactivation of already primed CD8 T cells (28, 32). This implies that periodic OX40 stimulation during late phases of chronic infection could also contribute to maintaining high frequencies of MCMV-reactive cells. Interestingly, CD8 T cell populations present during persistent polyoma infection consist in part of T cells newly recruited from the thymus (49), suggesting that long-term T cell populations in HCMV-infected individuals may also represent a combination of persistent and more recently primed T cells. Consistent with this idea, HCMV-specific T cells display heterogenous surface expression of costimulatory receptors indicative of different stages of memory development (50, 51), and it is highly likely that these cells may differentially express OX40 and/or respond to OX40 signals.
The observation that stimulation of OX40 augments the expansion of CD4 and CD8 T cells during MCMV infection has potential implications for the improvement of existing HCMV immunotherapy regimes. The generation of HCMV-specific CD8 T cell clones is technically and financially demanding. Although HCMV-specific CD8 T cells can be isolated directly from peripheral blood using HLA-peptide tetramers (52), therapeutic approaches that could induce the expansion and/or prolonged survival of these cells in vitro or following transfer into immune-suppressed recipients could significantly enhance the efficacy of such treatments. Because OX40 can promote allograft rejection (53, 54), there are obvious complications in attempting to target OX40 in vivo following transfer of HCMV-reactive cells into immune-suppressed transplant recipients. However, HCMV-specific cells could be stimulated through OX40 in vitro to allow the generation and transfer of greater numbers of cells. In line with this idea, our recent data in a therapeutic model of adoptive transfer of tumor-reactive CD8 T cells has shown that OX40 signaling in vitro can strongly influence the survival of cells when transferred into a recipient (32). Although the timing and requirement for OX40 stimulation and associated CD4 T cell help requires definition, these types of strategies may be applicable to HCMV immunotherapy in the future.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Disclosures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants CA91837 and AI67341 (to M.C.), AI048073, AI057840, AI057840, and R37AI33068 (to C.F.W.). A.L. is supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Fellowship LO1421/1-1. ![]()
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Michael Croft, Division of Molecular Immunology, La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, 9420 Athena Circle, La Jolla, CA 92037; E-mail address: mick{at}liai.org or Dr. Carl F. Ware, Division of Molecular Immunology, La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, 9420 Athena Circle, La Jolla, CA 92037; E-mail address: cware{at}liai.org ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: HCMV, human CMV; MCMV, murine CMV; OX40L, OX40 ligand; LCMV, lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus; VSV, vesicular stomatitis virus. ![]()
Received for publication December 12, 2006. Accepted for publication May 31, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
axis essential for lymphocyte survival revealed during cytomegalovirus infection. J. Immunol. 174: 7217-7225.
OX-40 with
CTLA-4. J. Immunol. 167: 6804-6811. This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. M. Snyder, A. Loewendorf, E. L. Bonnett, M. Croft, C. A. Benedict, and A. B. Hill CD4+ T Cell Help Has an Epitope-Dependent Impact on CD8+ T Cell Memory Inflation during Murine Cytomegalovirus Infection J. Immunol., September 15, 2009; 183(6): 3932 - 3941. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Salek-Ardakani, M. Moutaftsi, S. Crotty, A. Sette, and M. Croft OX40 Drives Protective Vaccinia Virus-Specific CD8 T Cells J. Immunol., December 1, 2008; 181(11): 7969 - 7976. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Walton, P. Wyrsch, M. W. Munks, A. Zimmermann, H. Hengel, A. B. Hill, and A. Oxenius The Dynamics of Mouse Cytomegalovirus-Specific CD4 T Cell Responses during Acute and Latent Infection J. Immunol., July 15, 2008; 181(2): 1128 - 1134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |