|
|
||||||||
as a New Hypoxia Response Factor Responsible for Coordinated Induction of the
2 Integrin Family1


* Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Womens Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115;
Mucosal Inflammation Program, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 80218; and
Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 integrin family of adhesion molecules. In this study, we show that coordinated induction of the
2 integrins during direct hypoxia-sensing occurs through transcriptional activation of each of the genes by which they are encoded. Certain of the molecular mechanisms that mediate this activation in transcription are dependent upon hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1), whereas others are HIF-1 independent. In search of these HIF-1-independent mechanisms, we identified Pur
as a new hypoxia-response factor. Binding of Pur
to the HIF-1-independent
2 integrin promoters is induced by hypoxia and mutagenesis of these Pur
-binding sites almost completely abolishes the ability of the promoters to respond to hypoxic conditions. Additional studies using siRNA directed against Pur
also revealed a loss in the hypoxic response of the
2 integrin promoters. Taken together, our findings demonstrate that hypoxia induces a coordinated up-regulation in
2 integrin expression that is dependent upon transcriptional mechanisms mediated by HIF-1 and Pur
. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is now appreciated that adhesion-based interactions coordinated by leukocyte
2 integrins are the primary means by which myeloid cells interact with other cell types, including endothelial and epithelial cells (9, 10). The
2 integrins are a family of four glycoprotein heterodimers composed of a unique
-subunit, encoded by the CD11a, CD11b, CD11c, or CD11d gene, noncovalently associated with a common
-subunit encoded by the CD18 gene (11, 12, 13, 14). Expression of the different subunits of the
2 integrins is coordinately regulated during leukocyte differentiation and during activation. Such coordinated regulation occurs at the level of gene transcription (15).
We have previously shown that the hypoxia associated with inflammation dramatically induces transcription of the CD18 gene (16). The molecular mechanisms that mediate this induction involve the heterodimeric transcription factor hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1)3 (17, 18). Although this finding provided an initial insight into how hypoxia regulates
2 integrin expression, the means by which hypoxia influences coordinated regulation of the different members of the
2 integrin family remained unknown. In the current study, we aimed to identify these molecular mechanisms.
Initial observations revealed that hypoxia induces transcription, not only of the CD18 gene, but also each CD11 gene that encodes an
-subunit of the
2 integrin family. Transcriptional induction of the CD11a and CD11d genes was found to be mediated by HIF-1-dependent mechanisms. However, induction of the CD11b and CD11c genes is mediated by mechanisms that are independent of HIF-1. Further studies revealed that hypoxia induces transcription of the CD11b and CD11c genes by mechanisms involving the ssDNA-binding protein Pur
. This finding identifies Pur
for the first time as a hypoxia-response factor. Furthermore, our results demonstrate that Pur
acts together with HIF-1 to drive coordinated induction of the
2 integrin family in response to hypoxia.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The human promonocytic cell line U937 and human microvascular endothelial cells were obtained and cultured as previously described (16, 19). U937 cells were exposed to hypoxia by replacing the growth medium with fresh medium equilibrated with a hypoxic gas mixture and incubated in a hypoxic chamber (Coy Laboratory Products). Measured pO2 was 20 mm Hg with the balance made up of nitrogen, carbon dioxide (ambient 5% CO2), and water vapor (16). Where indicated, human microvascular endothelial cells monolayers were activated by the addition of 100 ng/ml LPS (List Biological Laboratories). Leukocyte-endothelial adhesion assays were performed as previously described (16, 20).
Immunoprecipitation and Western blotting
U937 cells were exposed to experimental conditions and washed with HBSS, and then their surface proteins were labeled with biotin as described previously (16, 21). Cells were lysed and debris was removed by centrifugation, and then lysates were precleared with protein-G Sepharose (Pharmacia Biotech) (16). CD18 immunoprecipitation was performed with 10 µg/ml of the mAb IB4 followed by incubation with protein-G Sepharose (16). Washed immunoprecipitates were boiled in nonreducing sample buffer, separated by SDS-PAGE under nonreducing conditions, and transferred to nitrocellulose (16). Biotinylated proteins were labeled with streptavidin-peroxidase and visualized by ECL (Amersham Biosciences). Densitometric analysis of resulting blots (n = 4 per experiment) was performed using Image J software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD).
In subsets of experiments, individual CD11 integrin chains were immunoblotted following U937 cell exposure to indicated periods of hypoxia. Anti-CD11a (clone MHM.24) was obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, anti-CD11b polyclonal Ab was a gift from C. Parkos (Emory University, Atlanta, GA), anti-CD11c polyclonal Ab was obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, and anti-CD11d was a gift from D. Staunton (ICOS, Bothell, WA).
Quantitative polymerase chain reactions
Messenger RNA was quantified by real-time PCR as described previously (22). The primer sets consisted of 1 µM of sense primer and 1 µM of antisense primer each containing SYBR Green I (Molecular Probes). Primer sets (sense sequence, antisense sequence, and product size, respectively) for the following genes were used: CD11a (5'-AACTGGACTCAGGATGCCC-3', 5'-CAAGGAAGGAACCAAGAGAGG-3', 239bp), CD11b (5'-TCTCAGAGTCCTTCTGTTAACAG-3', 5'-AGCTGAGGGGGGCTGGTGG-3', 299bp), CD11c (5'-GAGAAATGATCCCTCTTTGCC-3', 5'-GTCCTTTTGGGGAACACAGC-3', 230bp), CD11d (5'-TATCATGGATTCAACCTGG-3', 5'-CGGGCCACAGGCCAGGAG-3', 283bp), and human
-actin (5'-GGTGGCTTTTAGGATGGCAAG-3', 5'-ACTGGAACGGTGAAGGTGACAG-3', 162bp). The analysis of
-actin was used to control for variations in the quantity of starting template. Transcript levels and fold changes in mRNA were determined as described previously (23).
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay
ChIP assays were performed using U937 cells subjected to normoxia or hypoxia and the mAb 9C12 that specifically interacts with Pur
or control IgG (16, 24). Primer sets for the following genes were used in the PCR phase of the assays (sense sequence, antisense sequence, and product size, respectively): CD11a (5'-AGTGAGAAACCATGACAGCAGTG-3', 5'-GCGTCAGGAGGCCCGTGGG-3', 289bp), CD11b (5'-GGCTAAGTCTATTCAGCTTGTTCA-3', 5'-GGAACCACAAGGAAGCCACCAA-3', 275bp), CD11c (5'-TGCATCCATCTAAGCAAAGGGCA-3', 5'-GAGGAGTGCTGCCCTGGTCC-3', 278bp), CD11d (5'-CGGGGCTCCCTGGGTACCAA-3', 5'-CAGAAGGTGCTCACCCTCCCA-3', 250bp) and CD18 negative control (5'-TGCAACCCACCACTTCCTCCA-3', 5'-ACCCTCGGTGTGCTGGAGTC-3', 166bp).
Transfection assays
U937 cells were used to assess the induction of the
2 integrin gene promoters by hypoxia. These cells were transfected by electroporation with a mixture of a plasmid that constitutively expresses Renilla luciferase (Invitrogen Life Technologies) and a construct generated by cloning one of the
2 integrin gene promoters into the plasmid vector pATLuc such that it is immediately upstream of a firefly luciferase reporter. The CD11a promoter spanned nucleotides –525 to +103 relative to the major site of transcription initiation, the CD11b promoter spanned nucleotides –242 to +71, the CD11c promoter spanned nucleotides –128 to +36, the CD11d promoter spanned nucleotides –419 to +60, and the CD18 promoter spanned nucleotides –79 to +19 (15, 19, 25, 26, 27). Background firefly luciferase activity was assessed by transfecting U937 cells with the Renilla expression plasmid mixed with the parental plasmid pATLuc that lacks a functional
2 integrin promoter (27). After transfection, cells were subjected to hypoxia or normoxia and lysed, and luciferase activity was assessed using a dual luciferase assay kit (Stratagene) and a Turner Designs luminometer. All firefly luciferase activity was normalized with respect to the constitutively expressed Renilla luciferase reporter gene. In subsets of experiments, Pur
binding site mutations were introduced into the CD11b and CD11c promoters by site-directed mutagenesis (28). Specifically, within the CD11b gene, the sequence 5'-GGCAGGCTG-3' spanning nucleotides –114 to –106 relative to major site of transcription initiation was mutated to the sequence 5'-GGCAttCTG-3' (28). The mutated nucleotides are indicated in lower case type. Within the CD11c gene the sequence 5'-CTTCCTTCCCC-3' spanning nucleotides –40 to –30 relative to major site of transcription initiation was mutated to the sequence 5'-aTTaaTTaaaa-3' (19). All mutations were confirmed by DNA sequencing. The ability of the mutated CD11b and CD11c promoters to respond to hypoxia was assessed as described above.
Inhibition of HIF-1
expression
HIF-1
depletion was accomplished by using phosphorothioate derivatives of antisense (5'-GCCGGCGCCCTCCAT-3') or control sense (5'-ATGGAGGGCGCCGGC-3') oligonucleotides as described previously (16). Western blot analysis for HIF-1
was performed as described previously (29). HIF-1
repression was accomplished using commercial siRNA provided by Dharmacon.
Inhibition of Pur
expression
Pur
depletion was accomplished by using siRNA directed toward the Pur
mRNA sequence 5'-CCGCAAGTACTACATGGATCT-3'. As a control for these experiments, a mismatched siRNA was used with the sequence 5'-CCGCAAGTAtTACgTGGATCT-3'. The two mismatches to the Pur
mRNA sequence in this control siRNA are indicated in lowercase type. Both the test and control siRNA were expressed from the plasmid vector pSUPER provided by Dr. R. Agami of the Netherlands Cancer Institute (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) (30).
Expression of recombinant Pur
The Pur
expression construct, pHAPur1, was provided by E. Johnson (Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York) and the empty vector control, pHA, produced by religation following liberation of the Pur
sequence by RsrII and EcoRI digestion (24).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Leukocyte
2 integrins are coordinately expressed as heterodimers composed of a common CD18 subunit linked to a subunit of CD11a, CD11b, CD11c, or CD11d (11, 12, 13, 14). In previous studies, we found that expression of the
2 integrin CD18 subunit is induced by hypoxia (16). Furthermore, we demonstrated that this induced expression contributes in a significant way to increased leukocyte binding to endothelium (16). However, CD18 induction would have no functional meaning without a concomitant induction of at least one of the
2 integrin CD11 subunits. Consequently, we hypothesized that CD11 subunits are hypoxia inducible. To address this hypothesis, U937 cells were subjected to normobaric hypoxia for 24 h and then assessed for their ability to adhere to LPS-activated endothelial cells in the presence of inhibitory Abs directed against CD11a or CD11c. As shown in Fig. 1, the component of increased leukocyte adhesion attributable to hypoxia (3.1 ± 0.6-fold increase, p < 0.01) was nearly completely inhibited by Abs directed against either CD11a or CD11c, but was unaffected by an Ab directed against
1 integrins. These results indicate that hypoxia-induced leukocyte adhesion to activated endothelial cells is dependent upon at least two of the
2 integrin
-subunits.
|
Because hypoxia induces CD11-dependent adhesion, we reasoned that this might be mediated by increased expression of CD11 protein. Initially, we examined induction of the sum total of all five
2 integrin molecules. This was achieved by subjecting U937 cells to a range of hypoxic periods (6–48 h), labeling surface proteins with biotin, and then immunoprecipitating CD18 from the lysates. Immunoprecipitates were resolved by SDS-PAGE and Western blots were probed with avidin-peroxidase. As can be seen in Fig. 2A, this protocol precipitates
2 integrin heterodimeric complexes of CD11 and CD18. Consistent with our previous work, the common CD18 subunit is significantly induced by hypoxia (16), with induction observed as early as 12 h of hypoxia (2.7 ± 0.6-fold by densitometry, p < 0.05), and maximally at 48 h (9.7 ± 2.3-fold by densitometry, p < 0.01). In parallel, hypoxia-inducible CD11 protein is also observed, with maximal induction observed at 48 h of hypoxia (8.7 ± 1.9-fold by densitometry, p < 0.01). We next used immunoprecipitation and Western blot analysis to assess the expression of the individual members of the CD11 family (Fig. 2, B and C). These analyses revealed increased expression of each member of the CD11 family upon hypoxia exposure (for CD11a, CD11b, CD11c, and CD11d; 3.1 ± 0.4, 3.6 ± 1.1, 5.4 ± 1.3, and 5.5 ± 0.8-fold increase by densitometry, respectively, all p < 0.025). Consequently, these results support our hypothesis that all the proteins known to be formed into
2 integrin heterodimers are coordinately induced by hypoxia.
|
Our previous studies demonstrated that the increase in CD18 protein induced by hypoxia is reflected as an increase in the steady-state levels of CD18 mRNA (16). Consequently, we determined whether increased mRNA levels also underlie the induction of CD11 proteins elicited by hypoxia. Using real-time PCR, we observed that the steady-state level of each CD11 mRNA was increased in U937 cells exposed to hypoxia (Fig. 3A). For these purposes, CD18 was used as a positive control (16). Interestingly, both the time-course and magnitude of mRNA induction varied depending on the protein encoded. Maximal induction of both CD11b and CD11c mRNA occurred within 2 h of hypoxia exposure and then rapidly subsided. However, maximal induction of CD11a and CD11d occurred after 6 h, then subsided slowly. In addition, the maximal level to which hypoxia induced CD11d mRNA was approximately half of that to which it induced CD11a, CD11b, and CD11c mRNA.
|
Transcriptional induction of the
2 integrin gene promoters
We next determined whether hypoxia-inducible CD11 reflects an increase in transcription, as had been found previously with CD18 (16). As shown in Fig. 4A, U937 cells transiently transfected with the wild-type CD11a promoter (nucleotides –525 to +103) showed a 57 ± 7-fold increase in activity (p < 0.01, with mean normoxia luciferase values of 155 ± 35 counts) when subjected to 24 h of hypoxia. The CD11b promoter (nucleotides –242 to +71) showed a 43 ± 8-fold increase (p < 0.01, with mean normoxia luciferase values of 486 ± 68 counts), the CD11c promoter (nucleotides –128 to +36) showed a 31 ± 5-fold increase (p < 0.01, with mean normoxia luciferase values of 446 ± 49 counts), the CD11d promoter (nucleotides –419 to +60) exhibited a 16 ± 4-fold increase (p < 0.01, with mean normoxia luciferase values of 87 ± 7 counts) and, as previously shown, the CD18 promoter (nucleotides –79 to +19) exhibited a greater than 20-fold increase (16). These results demonstrate that transcription driven by the isolated promoter region of each
2 integrin gene is induced by hypoxia. Thus, transcriptional activation of the
2 integrin genes appears to help mediate increased leukocyte adhesion during conditions of hypoxia.
|
Each
2 integrin promoter is activated by hypoxia (Fig. 2A). Our previous work demonstrated HIF-1
-dependent regulation of CD18 (16). Furthermore, chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis directly demonstrated HIF-1 binding to the endogenous CD18 gene (16). To determine whether CD11 promoters are controlled by HIF-dependent mechanisms, we first screened for expression of the various
-chains of HIF (HIF-1, 2, and 3) by Western blot. These studies revealed that U937 cells express only HIF-1, but not HIF-2 or HIF-3 (data not shown). Based on this evidence, we blocked expression of HIF-1
with antisense oligonucleotides (16) (Fig. 2B; 72 ± 6% decrease in protein, p < 0.025) and examined CD11a-d inducibility by hypoxia. HIF-1
antisense treatment resulted in 49 ± 6%, 44 ± 7%, and 88 ± 9% reduction in hypoxia-inducibility, respectively, for CD11a, CD11d, and CD18 promoters (Fig. 2C). Neither CD11b or CD11c promoter activity was significantly influenced by the HIF-1
antisense oligonucleotide, suggesting that both HIF-1-dependent and HIF-1-independent mechanisms regulate hypoxic induction of the
2 integrins.
Additional evidence of a role for HIF-1 was provided by targeted repression of HIF-1
. For these purposes, we used siRNA directed against HIF-1
and screened CD11a-d and CD18 promoters. This siRNA approach effectively decreased the expression of HIF-1
by 82 ± 7% by real-time PCR. Similar to our findings with HIF-1
antisense, HIF-1
siRNA blocked induction of CD11a, CD11d, and CD18 (58 ± 8%, 63 ± 10%, and 78 ± 11% reduction in hypoxia-inducibility, respectively, all p < 0.025). CD11b and CD11c promoter activity were not significantly influenced by the HIF-1
siRNA (p = not significant). Moreover, the combination of HIF-1
antisense and HIF-1
siRNA to maximally block the HIF pathway did not influence this induction pattern (data not shown).
The transcription factor Pur
exhibits increased binding to the
2 integrin gene promoters during hypoxia
Our use of HIF-1
antisense oligonucleotides and HIF-1
siRNA indicate that hypoxia induces CD11b and CD11c gene expression by mechanisms that are, for the most part, independent of HIF-1 (Fig. 4B). Important in this regard, our own analysis of the individual CD11 gene promoters revealed no obvious consensus motifs for HIF (S. Colgan, unpublished observations). Consequently, in the next phase of our analysis, we sought to identify the HIF-1-independent mechanisms. We reasoned that coordinated induction of the
2 integrin genes would likely involve common transcription factors. Therefore, we analyzed the
2 integrin gene promoters for shared consensus transcription factor binding sites. This analysis revealed that all the CD11 gene promoters contain close repeats of the sequence GGN, in which N is not G. Such repeats represent the recognition element of the transcription factor Pur
(31, 32). Our own analysis has revealed that the CD18 gene promoter contains no binding site for Pur
(data not shown). ChIP analyses of each of the CD11 gene promoters demonstrated that binding of Pur
is indeed a common feature of the CD11 genes (Fig. 5). Furthermore, this analysis revealed that Pur
binding to the CD11 gene promoters is strongly induced by hypoxia (Fig. 5). For these purposes, the proximal region of the CD18 promoter served as a negative control.
|
in HIF-1-independent induction of the CD11b and CD11c genes
We next addressed the functional significance of Pur
to the HIF-1-independent induction of CD11. Given the possible interactions of HIF-1
and Pur
on the CD11a and CD11d promoters (Figs. 4 and 5, respectively), we focused on the CD11b and CD11c promoters. First, as shown in Fig. 6, mutagenesis of Pur
binding sites in the CD11b (Fig. 6A) and CD11c (Fig. 6B) promoters almost completely abolishes their induction by hypoxia. Importantly, the mutations did not adversely influence the basal activity of any of these promoters. These results suggest that Pur
binding sites contribute significantly to hypoxia induction that is HIF-1 independent. As a second approach, we knocked down expression of Pur
in U937 cells by siRNA. As shown in Fig. 7A, this strategy successfully decreased Pur
expression by >85% (based on densitometric determination). In addition, and consistent with our findings using ChIP (Fig. 5), this analysis revealed that hypoxia induces Pur
mRNA (Fig. 7A). Examination of CD11b and CD11c promoter activity in U937 cells treated with Pur
siRNA showed significantly decreased hypoxia-induction (Fig. 7, B and C), confirming the role of Pur
as a hypoxia response factor.
|
|
recapitulates CD11b and CD11c promoter activity in hypoxia
Mutatagenesis and siRNA analysis suggested that Pur
binding is necessary for hypoxia induction of the CD11b and CD11c gene promoters (Figs. 6 and 7). We next sought to determine whether expression of Pur
was also sufficient to activate these promoters. This was achieved by cotransfecting the CD11b and CD11c reporter constructs with the plasmid pHAPur1 in which Pur
is constitutively expressed from the CMV promoter (24). As shown in Fig. 8A, transfection of U937 cells with pHAPur1 resulted in significant increases in Pur
expression in normoxia but not in hypoxia. Consistent with this engineered pattern of Pur
expression, CD11b and CD11c promoter activity was significantly increased under normoxic conditions but not under conditions of hypoxia. (Fig. 8, B and C). The levels to which pHAPur1 induced the CD11 promoters under normoxic conditions were approximately equivalent to those reached by the promoters under hypoxic conditions in the absence of Pur
overexpression. Taken together with our siRNA and mutagenesis results (Figs. 6 and 7), these observations indicate that Pur
is both necessary and sufficient to effect HIF-1-independent induction of the
2 integrins in response to hypoxia.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 integrin family. This family comprises four heterodimers, composed of a common
subunit encoded by the CD18 gene linked with one of four possible
subunits encoded by the CD11a, CD11b, CD11c, and CD11d genes (11, 12, 13, 14). In this study, we demonstrate that the
subunits of
2 integrin family are coordinately induced by hypoxia and identify, for the first time, that Pur
represents a common transcriptional regulator of this response.
Previous work has shown that endothelial cells contribute to inflammation by directly sensing hypoxic conditions and responding through induction of the selectin and ICAM-1 genes (35, 36). These studies suggested that in hypoxia, endothelial cells communicate with leukocytes primarily through the release of chemokines/cytokines and the functional activation of leukocyte-adhesive properties (35, 36). However, it is recently appreciated that monocytes have the capacity to transcriptionally induce adhesion molecules (e.g., CD18) independent of the hypoxic response of the endothelium. Central to this mechanism is leukocyte HIF-1
(16). Because
2 integrins are expressed on the monocyte surface as heterodimers, induction of the CD18 gene would have no functional consequence without concomitant induction of at least one of the CD11 genes. Initially, we profiled induction of the CD11a, CD11b, CD11c, and CD11d genes and demonstrated that each is induced at the mRNA and protein level following subjection to hypoxia. Notable were the differences in kinetics of this response for the various integrins. For example, induction of CD11b and CD11c is more rapid and transient than induction of CD11a and CD11d. Our previous studies have shown that the hypoxic induction of the CD18 gene is mediated by its interaction with HIF-1. Using antisense oligonucleotides and siRNA, we demonstrate in this study that HIF-1 contributes, albeit to a lesser extent than CD18, to induction of the CD11a and CD11d genes. However, this approach (HIF-1 antisense/siRNA) did not significantly influence hypoxia inducibility of CD11b or CD11c genes. Consequently,
2 integrin induction by hypoxia appears to be mediated by both HIF-1-independent and HIF-1-dependent mechanisms. That said, we have no evidence that either CD11a or CD11d are directly regulated by HIF-1. For example, we did not identify an obvious consensus binding sequence for HIF-1
, and the degree of transcriptional inhibition using HIF-1 antisense approaches was significantly less that CD18, which bears a classic HIF response element (16). Such findings implicate a more indirect role for HIF in CD11a and CD11d regulation. From this standpoint, a number of transcription factors have been implicated in the control of
2 integrin expression, including AP-1, MS-2, Sp1, and members of the Ets family (19, 27, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42), and it is appreciated that HIF cooperates with a number of other transcriptional regulators (1, 43).
It is striking that the CD11a, CD11d, and CD18 genes that are dependent upon HIF-1 are all induced to maximal levels after the CD11b and CD11c genes that are HIF-1-independent. We reasoned that such HIF-1-independent mechanisms likely involved a transcription factor that binds both genes such that their induction can be coordinated. In this study, we identified this factor as Pur
. This is the first description of Pur
mediating a hypoxia response. However, previously a role for Pur
in inflammation had been implied by its control of TGF-
1, CD11c, and CD43 expression and its increase in infiltrating eosinophils and activated endothelium during allergic reactions (19, 44, 45). Calcium mobilization is characteristic of the cellular activation that occurs during inflammation. In this regard, it is of note that the DNA binding activity of Pur
is increased by interaction with the calcium binding protein calmodulin (46).
Although Pur
has the capacity to bind dsDNA, its ability to bind ssDNA is at least 10-fold greater (31). The binding sites for Pur
within the CD11b and CD11c genes are associated with repeat sequences with the potential to form slippage structures with single-stranded loops. An induction in the availability of such loops might contribute to the dramatic induction of Pur
binding to the CD11b and CD11c promoters observed by chromatin immunoprecipitation. Indeed, it is possible that Pur
could itself contribute to the generation of single-stranded conformations because with isolated plasmids it can effect DNA unwinding (47).
Taken together, our results indicate that hypoxia coordinately induces
2 integrins by mechanisms which involve both HIF-1
and Pur
. Our results indicate that indirect and direct oxygen sensing are linked at the molecular level. Specifically, while in this study we demonstrate that Pur
is required for direct hypoxia induction of the CD11c gene, previously we have reported it is also required for CD11c induction by phorbol ester (19). Taking phorbol ester as a mimic of a cytokine response, our data implicate Pur
in both direct and indirect hypoxia sensing during inflammation.
| Acknowledgment |
|---|
| Disclosures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 This work was supported by Grants HL60569, DK50189, and DE016191 from the National Institutes of Health, Grant-in-Aid 0355696T from the Northeast Affiliate of the American Heart Association, and by a grant from the Crohns and Colitis Foundation of America. ![]()
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Sean P. Colgan, Mucosal Inflammation Program, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 80218 or Dr. Carl Simon Shelley, Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Medicine, 149 13th Street, 8th Floor, Charlestown, MA 02129. E-mail addresses: sean.colgan{at}uchsc.edu or shelley{at}receptor.mgh.harvard.edu ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: HIF-1, hypoxia-inducible factor-1; ChIP, chromatin immunoprecipitation. ![]()
Received for publication January 11, 2007. Accepted for publication May 25, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
in myeloid cell inflammation. Trends Immunol. 26: 434-439. [Medline]
. Crit. Care 7: 47-54. [Medline]
d
2, binds preferentially to ICAM-3. Immunity 3: 683-690. [Medline]
2 Integrins Elsevier Sciences Publishers, Amsterdam.
2 integrin gene expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 10440-10445.
mediates induction of the CD11c
2 integrin gene promoter. J. Immunol. 168: 3887-3893.
with the retinoblastoma protein, Rb, regulates binding to the single-stranded DNA Pur
recognition element. J. Biol. Chem. 270: 24352-24360.
2 integrin CD18 promoter consists of two inverted Ets cis elements. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14: 2604-2615.
is essential for myeloid cell-mediated inflammation. Cell 112: 645-657. [Medline]
2 leukocyte integrin): a novel mechanism of transcriptional regulation in myeloid cells. Blood 101: 311-317.
2 leukocyte integrin) transcription. J. Biol. Chem. 270: 23627-23633.
. Br. J. Haematol. 115: 159-166. [Medline]
, in rat lung and its increase in allergic airway inflammation. Jpn. J. Pharmacol. 78: 419-427. [Medline]
binding to single-stranded purine-rich DNA elements (PUR elements). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 255: 406-411. [Medline]
and comparison with Pur family member, Pur
. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1743: 64-78. [Medline]
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |