|
|
||||||||



* Transplantation Research Center, Renal Division, Brigham and Womens Hospital and Childrens Hospital Boston, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115;
Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114;
Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115;
Department of Immunology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; and
¶ Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worchester, MA 01655
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and IL-4 after allostimulation in vitro, prohibit the expansion of alloreactive CD4+ T cells, and appear to mediate a Th2 switch of recipient CD4+ T cells after adoptive transfer in vivo. Finally, these cells are not confined to the CD28-negative population but express programmed death 1, a molecule required for their regulatory function in vivo. CD8+PD1+ T cells suppress alloreactive CD4+ T cells but do not inhibit the functions by alloreactive CD8+ T cells in vitro. These results describe a novel allospecific regulatory CD8+PD1+ T cell induced by ICOS-B7h blockade in vivo. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ICOS-B7h blockade prolongs allograft survival in several transplantation models (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9). Those studies indicate a key role for the ICOS-B7h pathway in acute and chronic rejection and demonstrate the potential use of anti-ICOS therapy in combination with other immunosuppressive agents or other T cell costimulatory blockade regimens to promote allograft survival (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9). However, the exact mechanisms of action of ICOS-B7h blockade in vivo remain unclear. We have recently shown that delayed blockade of ICOS-B7h prolongs cardiac allograft survival (4). ICOS-B7h signal blockade results in the inhibition of alloreactive CD4+ T cell expansion and alloantibody production. In addition, the function of ICOS-B7h signaling was found to be independent of the presence or absence of a CD28 molecule in allograft recipients. Interestingly, the beneficial effect of the ICOS-B7h signal blockade was abrogated when CD8+ T cells were depleted in allograft recipients. It appears, therefore, that the effect of the ICOS-B7h signal blockade in preventing acute rejection is dependent on the presence of CD8+ T cells. Additional evidence supporting this hypothesis was the finding that cardiac allografts were promptly rejected in CD8-deficient recipients treated with ICOS-B7h blockade, suggesting that such a blockade may be generating regulatory CD8+ T cells that inhibit the alloimmune response in vivo (4).
The regulatory functions of CD8+ T cells have recently been highlighted in experimental models of autoimmune diseases (10, 11, 12), neonatal tolerance (13), and allergen-induced airway hypersensitivity (14). Several studies using tolerogenic APCs have demonstrated that regulatory CD8+ T cells play a key role in the mechanisms of either tolerance induction (15) or the suppression of pathogenesis of autoimmunity (16, 17). We have also demonstrated that the adoptive transfer of CD8+CD28– T cells into CD8–/– mice results in significant suppression of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (12). A recent article described the regulatory functions of CD8+CD122+ T cells in vitro (18). Moreover, in human recipients of renal allografts minor histocompatibility Ag, HA-1-specific, regulatory CD8+ T cells have been identified in the context of allograft tolerance (19). Also, regulatory CD8+CD28– T cells were significantly expanded in patients without rejection of cardiac allografts as compared with patients with acute rejection (20). The relationship of ICOS and regulatory CD8+ T cells in general or in the context of alloimmunity has not been investigated.
In this study we report for the first time that an ICOS-B7h signal blockade results in the generation of allospecific regulatory CD8+ T cells as a novel mechanism of action mediating the prolongation of allograft survival, and we define the effector mechanisms of these cells in vivo in a murine model of cardiac transplantation.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
BALB/c (H-2d), C57BL/6 (B6)4 (H-2b), and C3H/He (H-2k) male mice were purchased from Taconic Farms. CD8-deficient (CD8–/–) and CD28-deficient (CD28–/–) B6 male mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory. All animals were used at 6–10 wk of age (20–25 g), and were housed in accordance with institutional and National Institutes of Health guidelines.
Abs and in vivo treatment protocol
The anti-ICOS mAb (clone 7E.17G9; rat IgG2b isotype) (4) and anti- programmed death 1 (PD-1) mAb (J43; hamster IgG) (21) have been recently described. All mAbs were manufactured and purified by ISC BioExpress. CTLA4-Ig is a human Ab IgG1 from Bristol-Myers Squibb.
Anti-PD-1 mAb was given i.p. according to the protocol of 0.5 mg of mAb on the day of transplantation and 0.25 mg of mAb on days 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 after transplantation. Twenty-five milligrams of CTLA4-Ig is given i.p. on days 0, 2, 4, and 6. Delayed anti-ICOS treatment consists of 0.5 mg on day 4 and 0.25 mg on days 6, 8, and 10.
Murine cardiac transplantation
The vascularized intraabdominal heterotopic transplantation of cardiac allografts was performed using microsurgical techniques. In brief, donor and recipient mice were anesthetized with i.p. pentobarbital (70 mg/kg). Fully MHC-mismatched hearts (from BALB/c or C3H/He donors) were transplanted into B6 wild-type (WT), CD8-deficient (CD8–/–), or CD28-deficient (CD28–/–) recipients. The survival of cardiac allografts was assessed by daily palpation. Rejection was defined as the complete cessation of cardiac contractility as determined by direct visualization. Graft survival is shown as the median survival time (MST) in days.
CD8+ T cell purification for adoptive transfer experiments and in vitro suppression assays
To obtain 100% purified CD8+CD28– and CD8+CD28+ T cells for adoptive transfer studies, we first prepared a single-cell suspension from spleens of naive WT B6 or CD28–/– recipients of BALB/c cardiac allografts undergoing delayed treatment with anti-ICOS mAb (CD8icos) or appropriate isotype control Ig (CD8iso)14 days posttransplantation. CD8+ T cells were enriched (>95% CD8+ T cells) by MACS using a CD8a+ T cell isolation kit (catalog no.130-090-859; Miltenyi Biotec). To test whether regulatory CD8+ T cells were generated in recipients of cardiac allograft treated with ICOS blockade, CD8+ T cells were purified from C57BL6 or CD28–/– recipients of BALB/c hearts 2 wk after transplantation as described, and 20 x 106 cells were transferred via tail vein into CD8–/– or WT recipients of either BALB/c or C3H/He cardiac allografts. To study the effect of adoptively transferred regulatory CD8+ T cells in the absence of alloreactive CD8+ effector cells, some WT recipients underwent transient depletion by a mAb to mouse CD8 (clone 2.43) (100 µg i.p. on days –6, –3, and –1 before transplantation) as previously described (12). To evaluate the role of the negative costimulatory molecule PD-1 in the function of the transferred CD8icos T cells, some CD8–/– recipients of BALB/c hearts were treated with either anti-PD-1 mAb after adoptive transfer (0.50 mg i.p. on day 0 and 0.25 mg i.p. on days 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10). In other experiments, CD8icos T cells were stained with PD-1 mAb (eBioscience) and depleted of cells expressing PD-1 (<1%) by using MACS LS columns before adoptive transfer. Next, we flushed the MACS column several times and collected the enriched CD8+PD1+ T cells (>80%). Some of these cells were used for adoptive transfer experiments as described in detail above. Given the low number of this cell population, their regulatory activity was also tested in an in vitro MLR assay; splenocytes from B6 CD8–/– recipients of BALB/c allografts were used as responder cells to irradiated BALB/c splenocytes. Purified CD8+PD1+ and CD8+PD1– T cells were then added to each well (regulatory to responder T cell ratios of 1:1, 1:2, and 1:4) either in direct contact with or separated from responder cells using 8-well strip inserts (Nalge Nunc International). To evaluate the suppressive activity of regulatory T cells on CD4+ and CD8+ effector cells in vitro, WT, CD4-deficient splenocytes, or WT splenocytes after CD8 depletion ex vivo were also used as responders in the above MLR. The proliferation of responder cells (cpm) was then estimated by the degree of thymidine incorporation in responder cells.
ELISPOT assay
The technique for ELISPOT analysis has been described recently by our group and others (4). ImmunoSpot plates (Cellular Technology) were coated with 4 µg/ml rat anti-mouse IFN-
mAb or IL-4 mAb in sterile PBS overnight. The plates were then blocked for 1 h with sterile PBS containing 1% BSA-fraction V and washed three times with sterile PBS. Splenocytes (0.5 x 106 in 200 µl of HL-1 medium containing 1% L-glutamine) were then placed in each well in the presence of 0.5 x 106 irradiated (30 gray) syngeneic or allogeneic splenocytes and cultured for 24 h at 37°C in 5% CO2. After washing with PBS followed by washing with PBS containing 0.05% Tween (PBST), 2 µg/ml biotinylated rat anti-mouse IFN-
or IL-4 detection mAb was added overnight. All Abs described above were purchased from BD Pharmingen. The plates were then washed four times in PBST followed by 2 h of incubation with HRP-conjugated streptavidin (DakoCytomation) diluted at 1/2000 in PBS with 1% BSA. After washing three times with PBST followed by PBS, the plates were developed using 3-amino-9-ethyl-carbazole (Sigma-Aldrich). The resulting spots were counted on a computer-assisted, enzyme-linked ImmunoSpot image analyzer (Cellular Technology), and frequencies were expressed as the number of cytokine-producing spots per 0.5 x 106 splenocytes.
Cytotoxic T lymphocyte assay
Cell-mediated cytotoxicity was determined by 51Cr release assay. In brief, P815, a H2d tumor cell line, was maintained in our laboratory in RPMI 1640 medium (Invitrogen Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% fetal clone serum (HyClone), L-glutamine, and penicillin/streptomycin and served as the target cell. Target P815 cells were prepared by labeling with 51Cr as sodium chromate (50 µCi/million cells; New England Nuclear) for 1 h at 37°C followed by three washes with fresh medium. Labeled targets were seeded into wells of 96-well round-bottom plates (1 x 104 cells per well). Freshly isolated spleen cells from B6 mice that had been primed by BALB/c (H2d) skin transplantation and depleted of NK cells with an anti-NK1.1 mAb (0.025 mg; i.p.) in vivo 72 h before spleen cell isolation served as the effector cell population. Effectors were seeded into triplicate wells at E:T ratios of 100:1, 50:1, 25:1, and 12.5:1. Additionally, some wells received either enriched CD8+PD1+ or CD8+PD1– T cell populations as indicated in the text. Total releasable radioactivity (cpmmax; where max is maximum) was determined by incubating aliquots of target cells in a 5% solution of Triton X-100, and spontaneous radioactivity release (cpmspont; where spont is spontaneous) was determined by incubating aliquots of target cells with medium alone. Spontaneous release was uniformly <15% of maximal release. Before incubation, cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 300 x g for 2 min and then incubated for 20 h at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2. After incubation, 50 µl of supernatant was transferred to wells of a new microtiter plate containing 150 µl of OptiPhase SuperMix
-scintillation fluid (PerkinElmer) and counted (cpmtest) using a 1450 MicroBeta TriLux instrument (PerkinElmer). The percentage of specific lysis was determined using the raw cpm and the following formula: specific lysis (%) = [(cpmtest – cpmspont)/(cpmmax – cpmspont)] x 100.
Flow cytometry
To study the phenotype of purified CD8icos and CD8iso, cells were stained with CD8-FITC, CD4-FITC, and PE-conjugated mAb against PD-1, PD ligand 1 (PD-L1), PD-L2, CD27, CD70, glucocorticoid-induced TNFR (GITR), CD25, CD45RA, CD45RB, and CD103. To evaluate the CD28 expression on CD8icos and CD8iso, we made use of CD28-allophycocyanin. Intracellular CTLA-4 staining was performed using the Cytofix/Cytoperm intracellular staining kit. An anti-mouse Foxp3 staining set (eBioscience) was used to assess intracellular expression of Foxp3. Briefly, cells were fixed and permeabilized for 16 h in the dark, blocked with Fc block, and stained for Foxp3 for 30 min. All anti-mouse Abs and the kit above were obtained from BD Biosciences. Biotin-conjugated chicken anti-TGF-
1 Ab, biotin-conjugated goat anti-human latency-associated protein, and corresponding isotype controls were purchased from R&D Systems. Flow cytometry was performed using a FACSCalibur flow cytometer system (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using CellQuest software (BD Biosciences).
Measurement of serum alloantibodies
Naive splenocytes (106) of donor strain BALB/c were incubated for 30 min at 4°C with 50 µl of serially diluted sera obtained from naive B6 or BALB/c mice (controls) or B6 heart recipients adoptively transferred with CD8icos or CD8iso between days 10–14 after transplantation. Cells were washed twice, incubated with 50 µl of FITC-conjugated anti-mouse IgG1 or anti-mouse IgG2a (both from BD Pharmingen) at 4°C for 30 min, and analyzed by flow cytometry using a FACSCaliber system (BD Biosciences) and CellQuest software (BF Biosciences). The percentage of donor cells stained at each serum dilution and the relative median fluorescence was determined and compared with that of control samples (4).
Histological analysis
Cardiac allografts were harvested from CD8–/– recipients 14 days after operation. Specimens were fixed in 10% buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin. Ventricular short axis sections were cut and stained with H&E. Immunohistological staining for CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were performed using mAb purchased from BD Biosciences. A representative field (x40 original magnification) was selected and the numbers of CD8+ and CD4+ cells were counted.
Real-time PCR
Cardiac grafts were removed from adoptively transferred CD8–/– recipients 14 days after operation. RNA extraction was performed following Polytron homogenization using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies) according to the manufacturers protocol; RNA was then reverse transcribed to synthesize 60 µl of cDNA. Two hundred fifty nanograms of cDNA, 10 µl of SYBR Green master mix (Applied Biosystems), and 250 nmol of sense and antisense primer were used in a 20-µl quantitative PCR. Primers for IL-4 were designed with Primer Express software (sense, 5'-TCATCGGCATTTTGAACGAG-3'; anti-sense, 5'-CGTTTGGCACATCCATCTCC-3') Quantitative PCR conditions were as follows: 50°C for 2 min, 95°C for 10 min, and then 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 1 min. For each reaction, emitted fluorescence was measured during the annealing/extension phase. The calculated number of copies was divided by the number of copies of the housekeeping gene GAPDH.
Statistics
Kaplan-Meier survival graphs were constructed and a log rank comparison of the groups was used to calculate p values. Students t test was used for comparison of means between experimental groups examined by ELISPOT assay. Differences were considered to be significant when p < 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have previously demonstrated that delayed ICOS-B7h blockade by mAbs significantly prolongs vascularized cardiac allograft survival in a fully mismatched mouse transplant model (4). However, the same therapy had no beneficial effect in CD8-depleted (by mAb therapy) or CD8-deficient recipients, suggesting the possible generation of regulatory CD8+ T cells as a mechanism of prolongation of graft survival (4). In addition, whereas the transfer of naive CD8+ T cells into CD8-deficient recipients of BALB/c allografts led to acute rejection in a similar fashion as that of CD8-deficient mice with no transfer of such cells (MST 8 days vs MST 10 days, n = 5; p = NS), treatment of the former group with a delayed ICOS blockade demonstrated significant allograft prolongation (MST 15 days, n = 5; p = 0.002). These results demonstrate that naive or "conventional" CD8+ T cells alone (with no blockade of the ICOS-B7h pathway) have no effect on allograft survival; more importantly, the graft-prolonging effect of delayed ICOS-B7h blockade in WT recipients is dependent on the presence of CD8+ T cells.
To test this hypothesis, we have set up an adoptive transfer model where CD8+ T cells are purified 14 days posttransplantation from B6 recipients of BALB/c heart allografts after receiving delayed treatment with the CD8icos anti-ICOS mAb or after receiving the CD8iso isotype control Ig. Interestingly, adoptive transfer of CD8icos cells resulted in significant prolongation of BALB/c heart allograft survival in CD8–/– recipients as compared with control mice adoptively transferred with CD8iso cells (MST 63.5 days, n = 6 vs MST 10.5 days, n = 4; p = 0.001; Fig. 1A). To test the donor Ag specificity of the regulatory CD8+ T cells, we used the same adoptive transfer model but instead transplanted third party heart allografts (C3H/He) into CD8–/– mice. CD8icos had no beneficial effect on the survival of C3H/He hearts (MST 14 days, n = 6, Fig. 1B), clearly indicating the allospecificity of their regulatory function in vivo.
|
Regulatory CD8+ T cells mediate a Th2 switch of effector CD4+ T cells after adoptive transfer and localize to the graft
We characterized the cytokine expression profile of CD8+ T cells used for adoptive transfer and isolated from engrafted animals in response to stimulation by donor or third party alloantigens by using an ELISPOT assay (Fig. 2). The frequency of IFN-
-producing CD8icos (967.6 + 20.4) and CD8iso T cells (782.6 + 14.4) is enhanced in response to BALB/c donors as compared with third party (C3H) cells (520.5 + 19 for CD8icos vs 315 + 9.8 for CD8iso) due to allosensitization (Fig. 2A). Interestingly, while the frequency of IL-4-producing T cells in response to the C3H alloantigen was similar in both groups (35 + 2.8 vs 44 + 0), there was clear increase in the frequency of donor Ag-specific (BALB/c) IL-4-producing CD8icos cells as compared with CD8iso cells (Fig. 2B; 97.8 + 31 vs 50.2 + 4.1, p = 0.02).
|
-producing cells (227.5 + 92.1 vs 100.5 + 7.8, p = 0.06) and a significant increase in donor-specific IL-4-producing cells when the mice receiving CD8icos are compared with those adoptively transferred with CD8iso (340 + 88.9 vs 93 + 31.2, p = 0.003). These findings are intriguing because at this time point posttransplant CD8+ T cells are detected only in the allograft but cannot be detected in the spleen by flow cytometry (see below). Thus, regulatory CD8+ T cells inhibit IFN-
-producing alloreactive CD4+ T cell expansion while promoting the development of CD4+ Th2 responses after adoptive transfer in vivo. Although the H&E examination of all three groups on day 14 (CD8-deficient recipients of BALB/c allografts not adoptively transferred vs those after adoptive transfer with CD8iso or CD8icos) demonstrate broadly similar degrees of cell infiltration, the immunohistological examination clearly demonstrate that the cell infiltrates found in the grafts of control CD8-deficient transplant recipients (that are rejecting) consists of CD4+ T cells only as expected (76 ± 23.5 per high power field (hpf)), whereas the cell infiltrates in both CD8iso (rejecting) and CD8icos (prolonged survival) recipients consist of similar degrees of both CD4+ (34 ± 3.3 and 33.2 ± 19.2 per hpf) and CD8+ T cells (47 ± 18.5 and 48 ± 9.3 per hpf) (Fig. 3A). Interestingly, there is significant up-regulation of intragraft IL-4 gene expression following the adoptive transfer of CD8icos as compared with that of CD8iso (0.0347 ± 0.0056 vs 0.0075 ± 0.0044 copies per copies of GAPDH, p = 0.0009) (Fig. 3B). Although the main difference seems to be the type and phenotype of infiltrating cells, we found no difference in the alloantibody production/titers (IgG1 and IgG2a) in the sera of CD8-deficient mice adoptively transferred with CD8icos or CD8iso T cells (Fig. 4). Taken together, the results indicate that an ICOS-B7h blockade generates regulatory CD8+ T cells that are characterized by donor Ag specificity, the production of IL-4 in response to donor Ag, the inhibition of alloreactive CD4+ T cells but not alloantibody production in recipients, and the ability to migrate to the target tissue that they protect from rejection.
|
|
To understand the mechanisms of action of the regulatory CD8+ T cells in vivo, we first compared the expression of a panel of known regulatory markers between CD8icos and CD8iso by using flow cytometry (Table I). We found that the expression of the inhibitory molecule PD-1 to be significantly enhanced on CD8icos (13 ± 4.7%) as compared with CD8iso (7.5 ± 0.9%, p = 0.04) (Fig. 5A) while there was no statistical difference in the expression of a variety of other molecules including those previously reported to be associated with naturally occurring CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells such as CD25, Foxp3, GITR, or intracellular CTLA4.
|
|
Next, we tested the effect of an adoptive transfer of CD8+ T cells after ex vivo removal of the PD-1-expressing subset of cells (Fig. 5A, CD8+PD-1– T cells). PD-1-depleted CD8icos cells lack any regulatory functions (MST 11 days, n = 4, p = 0.001) as compared with CD8icos (Fig. 5B).
To further validate these findings, we next wanted to test the suppressive activity of CD8+PD1+ T cells. Because obtaining the necessary number of these cells for adoptive transfer in vivo would require a very large number of transplanted and treated animals (20 million CD8icos contain
3 million CD8+PD1+ T cells), we have performed adoptive transfer of 1.3 million (graft survival: 17 and 19 days) and 1.8 million CD8+PD1+ T cells (graft survival: 22 and 22 days) and found significant prolongation of graft survival (survival of controls: 8, 8, 9, 9 days, p = 0.04 and 0.04, respectively), demonstrating a sort of a dose response effect of regulation in vivo. Next, we compared the ability of enriched CD8+PD1+ T cells or PD1-depleted CD8+ T cells obtained from anti-ICOS-treated mice to suppress an MLR assay using CD8-deficient splenocytes as responder cells (Fig. 5C). In contrast to PD1-depleted CD8+ T cells, the enriched CD8+PD1+ T cells significantly suppressed the MLR at different ratios (percentage of suppression, 76.5 ± 8.5% for a regulatory-to-effector ratio of 1:1; >75% suppression at 1:2 and 1:4). These novel results are the first that clearly establish a key role for the inhibitory costimulatory molecule PD-1 as a phenotypic marker of regulatory CD8+ T cells in vivo. In addition, these data are consistent with the role of PD-1 in the suppressive functions of these cells.
To further elucidate the mechanisms of action of regulatory CD8+PD1+ T cells, we first characterized the cytokine expression profile of CD8+PD1+ as compared with CD8+PD1– T cells in response to a donor alloantigen by using ELISPOT assay. The CD8+PD1+ T cells contained less IFN-
-producing (236.7 ± 89.2 vs 589.3 ± 67.8, n = 3, p = 0.05) but significantly more IL-4-producing T cells (170 ± 12 vs 81 ± 5, n = 3, p = 0.009) after allostimulation when compared with CD8+PD1– T cells (Fig. 6, A and B). To evaluate the role of cell-cell contact in the suppressive activity of CD8+PD1+ T cells in vitro, Transwell studies were performed. We observed that the suppressive activity of Tregs was also preserved when the regulatory cells (1:1) were separated from the MLR by a Transwell insert, supporting cytokine-mediated suppression by Tregs in vitro (Fig. 6C).
|
CD8+PD1+ T cells suppress CD4+ but not CD8+ alloreactive T cells
Next we adoptively transferred 20 million regulatory CD8+ T cells derived from ICOS-treated WT recipients of BALB/c hearts into unmanipulated WT mice transplanted with BALB/c allografts. We found statistically significant, albeit biologically minor, prolongation of allograft survival (Fig. 7; MST 8.5 days, n = 6 vs MST 7 days, n = 6, p = 0.01). Based on these findings, we hypothesized that the regulatory T cells may be less effective in suppressing CD8+ effector cells. Thus, we repeated the adoptive transfer experiment but used CD8-depleted WT (by anti-CD8 mAb) rather than CD8-deficient mice as the recipients of the regulatory CD8+ T cell. This regimen has been previously shown to deplete CD8+ T cells for 10–14 days after which time the CD8+ T cells reappear gradually (12). Interestingly, as compared with unmanipulated B6 recipients, CD8-depleted B6 recipients of BALB/c allografts adoptively transferred with CD8icos demonstrated enhanced prolongation of allograft survival (Fig. 7; MST 11 days, n = 6, p = 0.0008), suggesting a lack of efficient suppression of alloreactive CD8+ effector cells by the currently used number of regulatory T cells. The shorter allograft prolongation induced by regulatory CD8icos in CD8-depleted vs CD8-deficient mice is not surprising, given that circulating anti-CD8 mAbs may also deplete some of the transferred regulatory T cells and also given the transient nature of CD8 depletion by mAb administration as compared with total deficiency in knockout mice.
|
Regulatory function of CD8+ T cells is not confined to the CD28-negative population
Several studies have previously demonstrated the regulatory function of CD8+CD28– T cells in autoimmunity and transplantation (12, 24). In addition, we and others have demonstrated that
60% of CD8+ T cells have high expression and 40% have low or minimal expression of the CD28 molecule in WT mice (12) (Fig. 1). In the case of the adoptive transfer studies described above, this means that the 20 million CD8icos cells derived from WT recipients of BALB/c allografts after the ICOS-B7h blockade contained roughly only 8 million CD8+CD28– T cells. Because our own data show long-term allograft survival in CD28-deficient recipients after delayed ICOS-B7h blockade (4), we asked the question of whether the CD8+CD28– subpopulation is primarily responsible for the regulatory functions of CD8icos. Thus, we repeated the described adoptive transfer experiment except that we used CD8+ T cells isolated from CD28–/– mice transplanted with BALB/c hearts and treated with the CD8icos anti-ICOS mAb or the CD8iso isotype control Ig. The adoptive transfer of 20 x 106 CD8+CD28– T cells effected only modest yet statistically significant prolongation of allograft survival (MST 20 days, n = 5 in ICOS-treated vs 13.5 days, n = 5 in isotype control Ig treated, p = 0.005), indicating that the regulatory function does not seem to be confined to CD8+ T cells lacking CD28. Further, we performed triple staining on CD8icos T cells (with CD8, CD28, and PD-1) because we have demonstrated PD-1 as the key marker for our regulatory T cells and found that most CD8+PD1+ T cells are contained in the CD8+CD28+ (percentage of CD8 T cells expressing both CD28 and PD-1, 11.8 ± 5.6%) rather than the CD8+CD28– (4.8 ± 2.9%) subset of T cells. Therefore, it is PD-1 and not CD28 that serves as the main marker of the regulatory CD8+ T cells in our model.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To further evaluate the mechanisms of regulation, we compared the expression of a panel of regulatory markers on regulatory CD8icos with that of control CD8iso. Previous studies demonstrated that the regulatory function is confined to the CD8+CD28– subset of T cells in models of both transplantation and autoimmunity (12, 24). Alloantigen-specific CD8+CD28– T suppressor cells were recently found to express Foxp3, GITR, and CTLA4 at levels similar to those observed in natural regulatory T cells even though they clearly differ from these cells both by their phenotype and mechanisms of action (36). Nevertheless, with the exception of PD-1 we found no difference in the expression of other regulatory markers. PD-1 is a new member of the CD28/CTLA-4 family that has been implicated in peripheral tolerance (37) and the regulation of alloimmune responses (23, 38, 39, 40, 41). In fact, a recent study clearly demonstrated that PD-1-PDL1 interaction is essential for induction of regulatory cells by the intratracheal delivery of alloantigen (42). Another study characterized CD4+CD25–PD-1+ T cells that uniquely produced large amounts of IL-4 and IL-10 in response to anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 mAb stimulation (43). Interestingly, the same cells were able to inhibit the development of colitis induced by the adoptive transfer of CD4+ T cells into SCID mice in a CTLA4- but not PD1-dependent manner despite expressing the latter molecule on their surface. In this study we clearly demonstrate that PD-1 rather than CD28 is the main phenotypic marker of our regulatory T cells. It is also interesting that a PD-1 blockade abrogated the graft-prolonging effects of CD8+PD1+ T cells in vivo. In contrast, CD8+PD1+ T cells contain significantly more donor-specific IL-4-producing cells and promote a Th2 switch of host CD4+ T cells after adoptive transfer. Taken together, these data are consistent with a key role for the inhibitory costimulatory molecule PD-1 in the actual suppressive function in vivo and suggest that CD8+PD1+ T cells mediate their suppressive activity by the secretion of immunoregulatory cytokines. The fact that CD8+PD1+ T cells can suppress in vitro in a contact-independent manner may point to some differences in the mechanisms of suppression by these cells in vivo and in vitro while still pointing to the importance of regulatory cytokines.
In sum, this paper describes a novel CD8+PD-1+ regulatory T cell induced by the blockade of a positive T cell costimulatory pathway, the ICOS-B7h pathway. The exact cellular and molecular interaction between ICOS-B7h and PD-1 in relation to the generation of regulatory CD8+ T cells requires further investigation. In fact, the therapeutic potential of a simultaneous stimulation of PD-1 and the blockade of ICOS-B7h costimulation in the prevention of lupus nephritis has been recently demonstrated in a mouse model of the disease (44). Thus, our results are clinically relevant and have important implications in organ transplantation because they clearly support tolerance-inducing strategies that consist of blocking positive costimulatory pathways combined with enhancing inhibitory costimulatory signals.
| Disclosures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 This work was supported by National Institute of Health Grants R01 AI51559, P01 AI041521, and P01 AI56299. N.N. is a recipient of the American Society of Transplantation Faculty Grant, the American Society of Nephrology John Merrill Transplant Scholar Grant, and the American Heart Association Scientist Development Grant. ![]()
2 A.I. and K.Y. contributed equally to this work. ![]()
3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Mohamed H. Sayegh, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Transplantation Research Center, EBRC, 221 Longwood Avenue, Third Floor, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail address: msayegh{at}rics.bwh harvard.edu ![]()
4 Abbreviations used in this paper: B6, C57BL/6; PD-1, programmed death 1; CD8icos, CD8+ T cells derived from animals tested with anti-ICOS mAb; CD8iso, CD8+ T cells derived from animals tested with isotype control Ig; GITR, glucocorticoid-induced TNF receptor; PD-L, PD ligand; hpf, high power field; MST, median survival time; WT, wild type. ![]()
Received for publication April 17, 2006. Accepted for publication May 8, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
repertoire during experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 8378-8383.
-treated antigen-presenting cells. Immunol. Res. 30: 155-170. [Medline]
production and proliferation of CD8+ T cells. J. Immunol. 175: 7093-7097.
after antigen-specific triggering. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89: 421-425. This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Takahashi, K. Matsumoto, H. Saito, T. Nanki, N. Miyasaka, T. Kobata, M. Azuma, S.-K. Lee, S. Mizutani, and T. Morio Impaired CD4 and CD8 Effector Function and Decreased Memory T Cell Populations in ICOS-Deficient Patients J. Immunol., May 1, 2009; 182(9): 5515 - 5527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Ueno, K. Tanaka, M. Jurewicz, T. Murayama, I. Guleria, P. Fiorina, J. C. Paez, A. Augello, A. Vergani, M. Wong, et al. Divergent Role of Donor Dendritic Cells in Rejection versus Tolerance of Allografts J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2009; 20(3): 535 - 544. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. H. Koehn, M. L. Ford, I. R. Ferrer, K. Borom, S. Gangappa, A. D. Kirk, and C. P. Larsen PD-1-Dependent Mechanisms Maintain Peripheral Tolerance of Donor-Reactive CD8+ T Cells to Transplanted Tissue J. Immunol., October 15, 2008; 181(8): 5313 - 5322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Peng, P. Ye, B. R. Blazar, G. J. Freeman, D. J. Rawlings, H. D. Ochs, and C. H. Miao Transient blockade of the inducible costimulator pathway generates long-term tolerance to factor VIII after nonviral gene transfer into hemophilia A mice Blood, September 1, 2008; 112(5): 1662 - 1672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |