|
|
||||||||
Converting Enzyme or Endocytosed in a Clathrin-Dependent Manner1
,











* Department of Anti-Aging Orthopedic Research,
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, and
Department of Musculoskeletal Reconstruction and Regeneration Surgery, Keio University, School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; and
Arthritis and Tissue Degeneration Program, Hospital for Special Surgery, and Departments of Medicine and of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY 10021
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
converting enzyme (TACE, also known as a disintegrin and metalloprotease 17) and was rescued by expression of wild-type TACE in these cells, strongly suggesting that the stimulated shedding is TACE dependent. Additionally, we observed that mCSF-1 is predominantly localized to intracellular membrane compartments and is efficiently internalized in a clathrin-dependent manner. These results indicate that the local availability of mCSF-1 is actively regulated by ectodomain shedding and endocytosis. This mechanism may have important implications for the development and survival of monocyte lineage cells. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B ligand. As illustrated by the osteopetrotic mutant mouse line op/op, which lacks functional CSF-1 and has few osteoclasts, CSF-1 is crucial for osteoclastogenesis (5, 6, 7). CSF-1 mRNA is alternatively spliced, giving rise to at least five different CSF-1 mRNA species, which in turn encode three biochemically distinct protein isoforms, as follows: a secreted glycoprotein, a secreted proteoglycan, and a cell surface glycoprotein (8, 9, 10, 11, 12). All three isoforms are biologically active and have been shown to correct the defects in op/op mice, to a different degree, when they are transgenetically introduced (13, 14, 15). Although some full-length CSF-1 has been shown to be expressed as a membrane-anchored isoform (16), the majority of membrane-bound or cell surface CSF-1 (henceforth referred to as membrane CSF-1 (mCSF-1))3 arises from alternative usage of exon 6 of the CSF-1 mRNA. It has been shown that osteoblasts and stromal cells express both the membrane-bound and the soluble CSF-1 isoforms (17, 18, 19), and that this membrane-bound isoform is capable of supporting osteoclastogenesis and CSF-1-dependent cell growth in vitro (20, 21, 22, 23). Additionally, mCSF-1 is involved in regulating body weight, which cannot be compensated by the soluble isoforms (14).
Interestingly, it has also been shown that mCSF-1 is proteolytically cleaved and released from the cell surface to become a soluble growth factor (24, 25, 26). In recent years, various membrane-bound molecules have been shown to be cleaved and released from the cell surface. The proteolytic release of extracellular domains of membrane-bound proteins, called ectodomain shedding, has emerged as an important posttranslational mechanism for regulating the availability and the function of membrane-bound proteins (27, 28, 29). The various shed molecules comprise a wide variety of functionally and structurally diverse proteins, including TNF-
and its receptors (TNFR1 and TNFR2) (30, 31, 32, 33), ligands of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor, such as TGF
, heparin-binding EGF (HB-EGF), EGF, amphiregulin, betacellulin, epiregulin and epigen (34, 35, 36), Notch (37), ErbB4 (38), chemokines such as fractalkine (39) and CXCL16 (40), and CSF-1 receptor, c-fms (41), to name some examples. The contribution of ectodomain shedding to the substrates function may be different from one protein to another. In the case of HB-EGF and TGF
, ectodomain shedding is essential, at least during development, for these growth factors to become fully functional (31), whereas in the case of the TNFR1, ectodomain shedding has a role in regulating the sensitivity of cells to TNF-
by reducing the receptors availability (42).
TNF-
converting enzyme (TACE) (3), also known as a disintegrin and metalloprotease (ADAM) 17, is the first enzyme shown to function as sheddase and was originally identified as an enzyme responsible for the ectodomain shedding of the membrane-bound precursor of TNF-
(30, 33). However, subsequent studies have identified a far wider range of substrates than initially expected, including the above-mentioned molecules (TGF
, HB-EGF, amphiregulin, epiregulin, epigen, TNFRs 1 and 2, ErbB4, chemokines, L-selectin, neuregulin, amyloid precursor protein, neurotrophin receptor p75, and c-fms) (30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 43, 44, 45, 46). The significance of ectodomain shedding in vivo has been highlighted by the phenotype of TACE-deficient (Tace–/–) mice, which showed various developmental defects quite similar to those seen in Tgf
–/–, Hb-egf–/–, and Egfr–/– mice (31, 47).
In addition to ectodomain shedding, other mechanisms can modulate the function of membrane-bound molecules, such as regulation of cell surface availability by means of intracellular trafficking. In fact, various receptors are known to be endocytosed upon ligand binding and then targeted for degradation, or recycled to the cell surface (48, 49, 50). Additionally, recent studies have revealed that some membrane-bound ligands are also subjected to internalization, and that this also has roles in regulating their functions (51, 52).
In this study, we evaluated the biochemical properties of the ectodomain sheddase of mCSF-1, which we found to be sensitive to metalloprotease inhibitors and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteases (TIMP) 3. Stimulated shedding of mCSF-1 was almost completely abolished in fibroblasts from Tace–/– embryos, and was rescued by expression of wild-type TACE, indicating that TACE is essential for stimulated mCSF-1 shedding. Moreover, we examined the subcellular localization of mCSF-1 and found that it is predominantly localized intracellularly and is efficiently internalized from the cell surface via a clathrin-dependent pathway. These results provide new insights into the mechanisms responsible for controlling the local bioavailability of CSF-1.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
TACE-deficient embryonic fibroblasts (Tace–/– mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs)) derived from E13.5 embryos were immortalized, as previously described (53 , 54). ST2 and COS-7 cells were from RIKEN Cell Bank and from M. Jasin (Sloan-Kettering Institute, New York, NY), respectively. Anti-hemagglutinin (HA)-Tag mAbs and anti-Myc-Tag polyclonal Abs were purchased from MBL. Fluorescent-conjugated Abs and streptavidin used in immunostaining were purchased from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories. TOTO3-, phalloidin-, and Alexa-Fluor 568-conjugated transferrin were from Molecular Probes. FITC-labeled wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) from Tritium vulgaris was from Sigma-Aldrich. Anti-calreticulin Ab was from Affinity BioReagents. Anti-mouse CSF-1 was purchased from BD Pharmingen. U0126 and SB202190 were purchased from Calbiochem. GM6001 was from Chemicon International, and human rTIMPs 1–3 were purchased from R&D Systems. All other reagents were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, unless otherwise indicated.
Cloning of murine mCSF-1 and generation of expression vectors
A cDNA fragment including the entire coding sequence of mCSF-1 was cloned by RT-PCR using the RNA from mouse bone marrow tissue as a template, and the PCR fragment was sequenced (see Fig. 1A for the nucleotide sequence of murine and human mCSF-1). The epitope-tagged expression vectors and cytoplasmic domain deletion mutants were generated by PCR and cloned into pAPtag5 (Genhunter) and pcDNA4/Myc-His (Invitrogen Life Technologies) (see Fig. 1B for the schema of each vector).
|
COS-7 cells, ST2 cells, and MEFs were grown in DMEM supplemented with 5% FCS and antibiotics. The cells were transfected with alkaline phosphatase (AP)-tagged mCSF-1 (AP-mCSF-1 and AP-
CP-mCSF-1; see Fig. 1B) using lipofectamine (Invitrogen Life Technologies), as previously described (34, 55, 56). Fresh Opti-MEM (Invitrogen Life Technologies) medium with or without the indicated reagents was added 18–24 h after transfection and incubated for 1 h. The supernatants were collected and cleared by centrifugation for 15 min at 15,000 x g in a centrifuge to removed cell debris. The activity of AP in the supernatant, which is derived from AP-tagged mCSF-1 released from the cell surface by proteolysis, was measured by colorimetry, as previously described (56). In short, 100 µl of cleared cell supernatants applied in 96-well plates was mixed with the same volume of 2 mg/ml 4-nitrophenylphosphate per well. AP converts 4-nitrophenylphosphate into nitrophenol, which results in increased absorbance at 405 nm. Plates were incubated at 37°C for color development, and OD405 was measured by a microplate reader (Model 680XR; Bio-Rad). The supernatant from nontransfected cells incubated with 4-nitrophenylphosphate for the same amount of time was used as a spectrophotometric blank to normalize for background AP activity. The conditioned supernatant from cells transfected with the AP-tagged vector and incubated without addition of a stimulus such as PMA or an inhibitor of shedding for the same amount of time was used as a control to determine constitutive background shedding for each individual experiment. The average of this constitutive background shedding was set to 1, and used as a reference to calculate percent increase in shedding following stimulation, or percent decrease in shedding following inhibition. The OD405 value of a given sample was normalized by dividing by the OD405 value of the standard from the same individual experiment. To validate that the AP activity in the supernatant was derived from shedding of AP-mCSF-1, but not from cell fragments or vesicles containing AP-mCSF-1, we visualized AP-mCSF-1 from the supernatant and the cell lysate by NBT/5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate (Sigma-Aldrich) on SDS-PAGE, as previously described (56), and confirmed that AP-mCSF-1 from the supernatant migrated faster than that from the cell lysate (data not shown). The faster migration of AP-mCSF-1 in the supernatant compared with the AP-mCSF-1 in the cell lysate is caused by proteolytic cleavage in the membrane-proximal ectodomain, which removes the transmembrane domain and cytoplasmic domain of AP-mCSF-1. All experiments were repeated at least three times in duplicate with similar results.
Immunostaining and confocal microscopy
Cells transiently transfected with HA-mCSF-1 or HA-
CP-mCSF-1 were incubated for 18–24 h, washed with PBS, and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA)/PBS. Permeabilization with 0.1% Triton X-100/PBS was performed when applicable. Fixed cells were blocked with 1% BSA/PBS, incubated with primary Ab at 4°C overnight, washed three times with PBS, and incubated with secondary Ab for another hour. Cells mounted in FluoroGuard (Bio-Rad) were viewed and photographed using an Olympus FV1000 confocal microscope and Olympus Fluoview software.
mCSF-1 internalization assay
The assay was performed essentially as described previously (51). COS-7 cells or ST2 cells were transiently transfected with HA-mCSF-1 or HA-
CP-mCSF-1. Twenty hours after transfection, cells were incubated with anti-HA Ab at 4°C for 1 h. Unbound Abs were removed by washes with PBS, and the cells were further incubated at 37°C for 0–60 min. After incubation, the cells were washed several times with PBS and fixed with 4% PFA/PBS, followed by permeabilization with 0.1% Triton X-100/PBS. The anti-HA Ab/HA-mCSF-1 complex was detected with fluorophor-conjugated secondary Abs.
Flow cytometry analysis
COS-7 cells transiently expressing either HA-mCSF-1 or HA-
CP-mCSF-1 were washed twice with ice-cold PBS and then incubated with anti-HA Abs at 4°C for 30 min. After this incubation, the cells were washed with PBS, and were either immediately trypsinized or further incubated with growth medium containing GM6001 at 37°C for the indicated periods of time before trypsinization. Trypsinized cells were resuspended in ice-cold 5% FCS/PBS, incubated with fluorophore-conjugated secondary Ab, washed two times with 5% FCS/PBS, and then analyzed by flow cytometry.
Statistical analysis
Students t test for two samples assuming equal variances was used to calculate the p values. Values of p smaller than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In humans, there are multiple CSF-1 mRNAs species (4.0, 3.0, 2.3, 1.9, and 1.6 kb), derived from a single gene via alternative splicing (8, 9, 11). Among these, mCSF-1 is encoded by the 1.6- and 3.0-kb mRNAs. We performed RT-PCR using RNA prepared from murine bone marrow to clone
0.8-kb-long PCR product. Sequencing revealed that it contained a 771-bp open reading frame with 83% identity to human mCSF-1 cDNA. At the protein level, murine mCSF-1 encoded a 257-aa protein with a putative transmembrane domain, which had 77% identity with human mCSF-1, with all the cysteine residues conserved between these two species (Fig. 1A). When HA-tagged mCSF-1 was expressed in COS-7 cells, it could be detected as a 38-kDa protein by Western blot analysis, which is consistent with the predicted mass of the tagged mCSF-1 molecule (data not shown). We thus concluded that the PCR product is a murine homologue of mCSF-1 and used it for the subsequent experiments.
Ectodomain shedding of mCSF-1 is metalloprotease dependent
Previous studies showed that cleavage of human mCSF-1 can be stimulated by phorbol esters, such as PMA (25), but the nature of this enzymatic activity remained to be characterized. To facilitate the analysis of the shedding activity of mCSF-1, we took advantage of an AP reporter system for ectodomain shedding (for a detailed description of this method, see Ref. 56). Briefly, a mCSF-1 expression vector with an AP tag added to its 5' end was generated (AP-mCSF-1), and was transfected into cultured cells. Cleavage of AP-mCSF-1 resulted in the release of AP activity into the supernatant, allowing shedding of the soluble ectodomain to be assessed by spectrophotometric detection of AP activity. As described previously for untagged mCSF-1 (25), we found that the shedding of the AP-tagged version of mCSF-1 can also be stimulated with PMA (Fig. 2A). To further characterize the protease responsible for this activity, we examined whether GM6001, a broad-spectrum metalloprotease inhibitor, could inhibit this activity. As shown in Fig. 2A, addition of GM6001 effectively decreased both the constitutive and PMA-stimulated shedding of AP-mCSF-1 from transfected COS-7 cells, indicating that the shedding of mCSF-1 into the culture supernatant is metalloprotease dependent, and not caused by release of membrane vesicles or cell debris from the cells. Identical results were obtained when mCSF-1 shedding was studied in ST2 cells, which express endogenous CSF-1 and support osteoclastogenesis in vitro (57) (Fig. 2B).
|
Various signaling pathways and stimuli have been implicated in metalloprotease-mediated ectodomain shedding. Among these, the MAPK pathway has been shown to participate in growth factor-induced and PMA-induced ectodomain shedding for several membrane-bound molecules whose shedding depends on TACE (46, 58, 59). To assess the possible involvement of the MAPK signaling pathway in the release of mCSF-1, we evaluated how a MEK-1 and -2 inhibitor, U0126, and a P38 MAPK inhibitor, SB202190, affected mCSF-1 shedding. Both U0126 and SB202190 slightly reduced the level of constitutive shedding of mCSF-1 (32 and 27%, respectively; Fig. 2C). In contrast, PMA-stimulated shedding was inhibited by 50 and 35% with each reagent, respectively, and was almost completely reduced to the level of basal constitutive shedding when these two inhibitors were used simultaneously, suggesting synergistic effects between these two inhibitors. To further validate these observations, we performed similar experiments using the inhibitors at a lower concentration, either alone (Fig. 2D) or in combination (Fig. 2E). Both U0126 and SB202190 showed statistically significant inhibitory effect at 0.2 µM. When used in combination at this concentration, PMA-stimulated shedding was inhibited by 44%, which is lower than that of these inhibitors used alone (U0126, 24%; SB202190, 30%, respectively). These observations indicate that PMA-stimulated shedding of mCSF-1 is potentially dependent on the MAPK signaling pathways.
Shedding of mCSF-1 is inhibited by TIMP3, but not by TIMP1 or 2
Because the members of the metzincin family, including matrix metalloproteases (MMPs), membrane-type (MT)-MMPs, ADAM domain with thrombospondin type I motifs (ADAMTSs), and ADAMs, show different sensitivity to TIMPs (for reviews on TIMPs, see Refs. 60 and 61), determining the TIMP-inhibitor profile can be an informative approach toward identifying a given sheddase. MMPs are sensitive to TIMPs 1–3, whereas MT1-MMP is sensitive to TIMPs 2 and 3, but not TIMP1, whereas TACE is partially inhibited by TIMP3 only. As shown in Fig. 2F, TIMP3 had a significant inhibitory effect on PMA-induced shedding, whereas TIMPs 1 and 2 had little effect, if any, indicating that the PMA-induced shedding is unlikely to be dependent on MMPs or MT1-MMP. Interestingly, the inhibitory effect of TIMP3 on constitutive shedding was only marginal, although statistically significant, compared with that of GM6001 (Fig. 2A), indicating a possible involvement of other metalloprotease(s) that is less sensitive to TIMPs 1–3 in constitutive shedding of mCSF-1.
PMA-stimulated shedding of mCSF-1 is TACE dependent
Because TACE-dependent shedding can usually be stimulated by PMA, and because TACE is sensitive to TIMP3, but not to TIMPs 1 or 2 (62, 63), we hypothesized that TACE is involved in the shedding of mCSF-1. To assess the contribution of TACE to the shedding of mCSF-1, we used immortalized embryonic fibroblasts derived from E13.5 Tace–/– embryos (Tace–/– MEFs) (54). AP-mCSF-1 was transfected into Tace–/– MEFs together with a wild-type TACE expression vector or with an empty vector. PMA-stimulated shedding was abolished in Tace–/– MEFs (Fig. 3A), and the coexpression of TACE restored PMA-induced shedding activity to a similar level as seen in wild-type control cells (Fig. 3B), suggesting that TACE indeed plays an essential role in PMA-stimulated mCSF-1 shedding.
|
In an attempt to further characterize the cell-biological properties of mCSF-1, we studied its subcellular localization, about which very little has been previously reported (11). When COS-7 cells were transfected with HA-tagged mCSF-1 and immunostained without permeabilization, positive staining was observed on the cell surface (Fig. 4A, a and b). However when PFA-fixed cells were permeabilized with Triton X-100, strong staining was predominantly observed inside the cell, presumably in the Golgi apparatus and in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (Fig. 4A, c and d). The anti-HA Ab did not stain untransfected control cells (data not shown). To further corroborate the expression of HA-mCSF-1 on the cell surface, cells transfected with HA-mCSF-1 were trypsinized and then subjected to flow cytometry. As shown in Fig. 4B, the anti-HA Ab bound to HA-mCSF-1 on cell surface, whereas the anti-Myc Ab, which only recognizes an intracellular domain of HA-mCSF-1, did not show any detectable binding (see Fig. 1B for a diagram of the construct). A similar subcellular staining pattern was observed with ST2 cells, which endogenously express CSF-1, and with COS-7 cells transiently expressing HA-mCSF-1 after they were stained with anti-CSF-1 Abs (Fig. 4C). The subcellular localization of mCSF-1 was further examined by costaining the ER with anti-calreticulin, and the Golgi apparatus with WGA. Fig. 4D shows a significant overlap of the staining pattern between mCSF-1 and these two organelle markers. To examine whether PMA has an impact on the cellular localization of mCSF-1, cell staining was also performed with or without incubation with PMA. However, as shown in Fig. 4E (a, b, d, e, g, and h), there was no evident change in the subcellular localization of CSF-1 in the presence or absence of PMA. Additionally, in all cases, there was no major difference in the staining pattern observed with an anti-HA Ab (which recognizes the extracellular domain of HA-mCSF-1) compared with an anti-Myc Ab (which recognizes the cytoplasmic domain of HA-mCSF-1). This observation indicates that a relatively small proportion of the cell-associated mCSF-1 molecules is subjected to ectodomain shedding, and hence, most remain uncleaved (because HA-mCSF-1 is dually tagged by HA and Myc epitopes, any dissociation in the staining pattern between these two epitopes reflects the presence of cleaved mCSF-1 or the membrane-bound cleaved stalk). Alternatively, shed mCSF-1 could be rapidly released from the cell and the membrane-bound stalk could then be immediately degraded. We next examined whether inhibiting mCSF-1 shedding would lead to accumulation of uncleaved mCSF-1 on the cell surface, which should result in stronger staining on the plasma membrane. However, there was little, if any, difference in the staining pattern of mCSF-1 after incubation in the presence of GM6001 for up to 5 h (Fig. 4E, c, f, and i). Consistent with these results, flow cytometric analysis did not reveal any significant difference in the amount of HA-mCSF-1 on the cell surface of COS-7 cells treated with PMA to stimulate shedding, or with GM6001 to block shedding (Fig. 4F). The ratio of HA-mCSF-1-positive COS-7 cells relative to the untreated control (=100%) was 96.8% ± 1.0 SD for PMA-treated cells and 101.2% ± 4.0 SD for GM6001-treated cells (n = 3, p > 0.9), respectively. Up-regulation (by PMA) and inhibition (by GM6001) of the release of HA-mCSF-1 in the supernatant were confirmed by ELISA against murine CSF-1 (data not shown). These results suggest that either a limited amount of the total mCSF-1 is subjected to shedding, as mentioned above, or that uncleaved mCSF-1 is rapidly removed from the cell surface via endocytosis.
|
To address the hypothesis that uncleaved mCSF-1 is internalized, as is the case for some other membrane-tethered molecules such as TGF
and the EGFR (49, 51), we incubated live COS-7 cells transiently expressing HA-mCSF-1 with an anti-HA Ab at 4°C and examined whether the bound Abs would be endocytosed and thereby relocalized to an intracellular vesicular compartment. As shown in Fig. 5A (a and b), the HA-mCSF-1/anti-HA-Ab complex was efficiently internalized when COS-7 cells were subsequently incubated at 37°C, but not when they were immediately fixed after incubation at 4°C. Identical results were also observed in ST2 cells (Fig. 5A, c and d), indicating that this cellular mechanism is also active in a cell line used as a model for osteoblasts and stromal cells. Because internalization of a given ligand or a receptor can be triggered by addition of an Ab, we next examined whether the internalization of mCSF-1 occurs independently of Ab binding. COS-7 cells transiently expressing HA-mCSF-1 were cell surface biotinylated and incubated at 37°C. We then immunostained the cells with anti-HA- and FITC-conjugated secondary Abs (to detect HA-mCSF-1) and rhodamine-conjugated streptavidin (to detect biotinylated molecules), and compared their subcellular localization. As shown in Fig. 5B, numerous costained spots were found in the merged images. This result implies that the internalization of mCSF-1 can also occur independently of Ab stimulation.
|
Deletion of the cytoplasmic domain leads to faster internalization/degradation of mCSF-1
Because the cytoplasmic domain of membrane proteins is essential for proper endocytic sorting, we next asked whether the deletion of the cytoplasmic domain of mCSF-1 has an impact on the subcellular localization or turnover of mCSF-1. We transfected mCSF-1 lacking its cytoplasmic domain (HA-
CP-mCSF-1) and HA-mCSF-1 into COS-7 cells and performed an internalization assay with a 0- to 60-min time course (Fig. 6A). Both HA-
CP-mCSF-1 and HA-mCSF-1 had a comparable cell surface staining pattern at the outset of this experiment, yet HA-
CP-mCSF-1 was internalized more rapidly than HA-mCSF-1. Internalization of HA-
CP-mCSF-1 was seen after 5 min, whereas most of the Ab-bound HA-mCSF-1 still remained on the cell surface, with only very little positive staining of intracellular membranes (Fig. 6A, b, c, h, and i). The internalization of HA-
CP-mCSF-1 appeared to be increased throughout this experiment, and there were many cells with only a few positive spots left at 60 min, indicating increased degradation of HA-
CP-mCSF-1 in addition to increased endocytosis. In contrast, in cells transfected with HA-mCSF-1, strong positive staining was seen in endosomes and on the cell surface during the same time period. Because the rapid disappearance of HA-
CP-mCSF-1 from the cell surface could also be caused by accelerated shedding, we performed a similar assay in the presence of GM6001. However, as shown in Fig. 6B, addition of the metalloprotease inhibitor GM6001 had no detectable effect on the removal of HA-
CP-mCSF-1. Furthermore, deletion of the cytoplasmic domain of mCSF-1 did not significantly affect its shedding efficiency compared with wild-type mCSF-1 (Fig. 6C). To quantitatively validate the more rapid disappearance of HA-
CP-mCSF-1 compared with HA-mCSF-1, we repeated the experiments described above using a flow cytometric analysis as a readout for the surface expression levels of both membrane proteins. COS-7 cells transiently expressing either HA-mCSF-1 or HA-
CP-mCSF-1 were labeled with anti-HA Ab at 4°C and were subsequently incubated at 37°C for 0–6 h in the presence of GM6001. Following the incubation, the cells were trypsinized and resuspended in 5% FCS/PBS. As shown in Fig. 6, D and E, flow cytometric analysis demonstrated that HA-
CP-mCSF-1 disappears more rapidly from the cell surface than HA-mCSF-1 (79.5% ± 3.3 SD and 42.0% ± 13.7 SD at 6 h, respectively), which corroborates the results obtained with confocal microscopy (see above). Taken together, these observations indicate that the cytoplasmic domain of mCFS-1 has a role in endocytic sorting and in the regulation of the cell surface expression levels, but does not affect the susceptibility of mCSF-1 to ectodomain shedding.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
As was shown previously (25), the phorbol ester PMA strongly stimulates mCSF-1 shedding. To further characterize this proteolytic activity, we explored the inhibitory effects of several reagents. Both constitutive and PMA-stimulated shedding of mCSF-1 was sensitive to the metalloprotease inhibitor GM6001 in COS-7 cells and ST2 cells, demonstrating that it depends on a metalloprotease(s). Because GM6001 can inhibit the proteolytic activity of several different enzymes, including MMPs, MT-MMPs, ADAMTSs, and ADAMs, we next used TIMPs 1–3 to narrow down the candidate proteases. TIMPs are the major cellular inhibitors of metalloproteases and have been shown to exhibit distinct efficacies against different metalloprotease subfamily members (61). PMA-stimulated shedding of mCSF-1 was reduced to the levels of constitutive shedding by TIMP3, but not by TIMP1 or 2. This result excludes MMPs, which are sensitive to all three TIMPs, and MT1-MMP, which is sensitive to TIMPs 2 and 3, leaving ADAMs and ADAMTSs as candidate sheddases for mCSF-1.
Because the proteolytic activity of TACE can be highly stimulated by phorbol ester and is sensitive to TIMP3 (34, 46, 55, 62, 63), we hypothesized that TACE is, at least in part, responsible for mCSF-1 shedding. To explore this possibility, we used immortalized fibroblasts derived from Tace–/– embryos. Cells lacking TACE showed little PMA-stimulated increase in mCSF-1 shedding. The PMA-stimulated shedding of mCSF-1 from these cells could be rescued by cotransfection of wild-type TACE, demonstrating that TACE is required for PMA-regulated shedding of mCSF-1. Intriguingly, although constitutive shedding of mCSF-1 was inhibited by GM6001, it was less sensitive to TIMP3. Consistent with this observation, GM6001 showed an inhibitory effect on constitutive shedding even in the absence of TACE (data not shown), and the expression of wild-type TACE in Tace–/– MEFs only led to a minor up-regulation in the constitutive shedding of mCSF-1. The properties of the mCSF-1 sheddases thus closely resemble those of the sheddases for the p75 neurotrophin receptor, for which the PMA-stimulated sheddase is also TACE, whereas the constitutive sheddase(s) is (are) distinct from TACE (46).
For several TACE substrates, such as TGF
, L-selectin, TNF-
, and the neurotrophin receptor p75, it has been shown that regulated and constitutive shedding activities depend on MAPK signaling (46, 59). The current study shows that PMA-stimulated mCSF-1 shedding is also potentially dependent on signaling via both MEK and P38 MAPK pathways. This is supported by the observation that the PMA-stimulated component of CSF-1 shedding was strongly reduced when these two pathways are simultaneously blocked. In contrast, the inhibitors of these two MAPKs showed only limited effects on constitutive shedding compared with that of GM6001. This observation further supports the hypothesis that there are distinct sheddases responsible for constitutive and stimulated shedding of mCSF-1.
Processing of membrane proteins by TACE usually occurs in the juxtamembrane region of the substrates. In the case of EGFR-ligand family, the cleavage site is located 7–14 aa residues from the transmembrane domain (68). Similarly, the cleavage site of human mCSF-1 is located at
8 aa residues from transmembrane domain (69). To our knowledge, the cleavage site of murine mCSF-1 had not been identified yet; however, because the amino acid residues around the putative cleavage site are identical (EGSS; see Fig. 1A) in mouse and human mCSF-1, it is likely that both have the same cleavage site. In contrast, five residues in the juxtamembrane domain of human mCSF-1 (PQLQE), which are essential for human mCSF-1 cleavage (69), are not conserved in mouse (PQIPE). We found that the deletion of these five residues from mouse mCSF-1 had little impact on the efficiency of its ectodomain shedding (data not shown).
Although the membrane-bound isoform of CSF-1 was identified several years ago, very little is known about the subcellular localization of mCSF-1 (11). Our data show that mCSF-1 is detectable on the cell surface; however, the predominant localization of mCSF-1 appears to be in an intracellular compartment. One possible explanation for the relatively low amount of mCSF-1 on the cell surface might be that it is efficiently shed from the cell surface. In this case, blocking mCSF-1 should lead to an accumulation of uncleaved mCSF-1 on the cell surface. However, treatment with GM6001, which blocks mCSF-1 shedding, or with PMA, which enhances its shedding, had little effects on the subcellular expression pattern of mCSF-1. To further explore the fate of uncleaved mCSF-1, we labeled HA-tagged mCSF-1 with anti-HA Abs and tracked its subcellular localization. This demonstrated that uncleaved mCSF-1 is efficiently endocytosed in a clathrin-dependent manner. Taken together, these observations suggest a model in which the availability of soluble mCSF-1 derived from the membrane-anchored form can be controlled by ectodomain shedding, whereas the levels of mCSF-1 on the cell surface appear to be regulated by internalization via clathrin-coated pits. In addition, shedding could also affect the amounts of mCSF-1 on the cell surface, even though this was difficult to detect in the experiments presented in this study, presumably because any mCSF-1 molecules that escaped ectodomain shedding would be rapidly endocytosed.
Previous studies have identified several motifs, which encode endocytic signals and have essential roles in targeting the receptors/ligands to their subcellular destination. These include tyrosine-based (NPXY and YXX
;
, a bulky hydrophobic side chain) (70) and dileucine ([DE]XXXL[LI] and DXXLL) (71, 72) signals. The cytoplasmic domain of mCSF-1 is relatively short (37 aa; see Fig. 1A) and lacks any of these well-characterized motifs. Further studies will therefore be necessary to identify the motif(s) required for intracellular trafficking and endocytosis of mCSF-1.
The exact role of ectodomain shedding of mCSF-1 in vivo remains to be determined. Uncleaved mCSF-1 is at least as potent as the soluble isoforms or has synergistic effects in its ability to support osteoclastogenesis in vitro (21, 73, 74, 75). However, the bioactivity of CSF-1 is retained even after it is shed to become soluble (25). Thus, the shedding mechanism does not seem to be simply involved in switching the function of mCSF-1 on or off, as is the case for TGF
and HB-EGF, in which ectodomain shedding is essential for their functional activation during development (31, 47). One possible purpose of mCSF-1 shedding might be to down-regulate c-fms signaling elicited by cell-cell contact, which is thought to generate an even more potent signal than that induced by the interaction between soluble CSF-1 and c-fms (21, 76). However, because blocking shedding did not lead to a detectable increase in mCSF-1 levels on the cell surface, one would have to postulate that even small increases in mCSF-1 amounts on the cell surface, which might be difficult to detect with the assays used in this study, would affect its ability to participate in juxtacrine signaling. It is also possible that shedding regulates specific, nonredundant functions of the membrane-bound isoform, such as the maintenance of a normal growth rate (14). Finally, shedding of mCSF-1 could contribute to paracrine signaling, and thereby have similar functions as the soluble splice variants. This would provide an additional mechanism to generate soluble mCSF-1, which would be subjected to regulation by metalloproteases instead of alternative splicing. Further studies, including the generation of knock-in mice carrying uncleavable mCSF-1, will be required to learn more about the role of ectodomain shedding in regulating the function of mCSF-1.
In summary, we present an evaluation of the ectodomain shedding and endocytosis of mCSF-1. Pharmacological inhibitors and a mutant cell line were used to identify TACE as the major sheddase for stimulated shedding for mCSF-1. Moreover, our data show for the first time that uncleaved mCSF-1 is internalized via a clathrin-dependent mechanism, indicating that the bioactivity and/or availability of cell surface mCSF-1 are regulated by two different mechanisms, as follows: namely, ectodomain shedding and endocytosis. These observations are likely to contribute to a better understanding of the local regulation of CSF-1 and of its role in osteoclastogenesis and the survival and development of monocyte lineage cells.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 This work was supported by Nagao Memorial Fund, The Nakatomi Foundation, and Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (19591765) to K.H. ![]()
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Keisuke Horiuchi, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Keio University, School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan. E-mail address: horiuchi{at}z3.keio.jp ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: mCSF-1, membrane CSF-1; ADAM, a disintegrin and metalloprotease; ADAMTS, ADAM domain with thrombospondin type I motif; AP, alkaline phosphatase; EGF, epidermal growth factor; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; HA, hemagglutinin; HB, heparin binding; MEF, mouse embryonic fibroblast; MMP, matrix metalloprotease; MT-MMP, membrane-type MMP; PFA, paraformaldehyde; TACE, TNF-
converting enzyme; TIMP, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteases; WGA, wheat germ agglutinin. ![]()
Received for publication April 10, 2007. Accepted for publication August 31, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
vβ3 and macrophage CSF: partners in osteoclast biology. Immunol. Rev. 208: 88-105. [Medline]
induces transcription of the CSF-1 gene in murine osteoblasts. J. Cell. Physiol. 168: 199-208. [Medline]
from cells. Nature 385: 729-733. [Medline]
converting enzyme inhibits proTNF and TNFRII secretion. J. Immunol. 163: 4105-4108.
. Nature 385: 733-736. [Medline]
converting enzyme (TACE) regulates epidermal growth factor receptor ligand availability. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 12838-12845.
-secretase activity in fibroblasts. Hum. Mol. Genet. 11: 2615-2624.
-converting enzyme is required for cleavage of erbB4/HER4. J. Biol. Chem. 275: 10379-10387.
-converting enzyme (ADAM17) mediates the cleavage and shedding of fractalkine (CX3CL1). J. Biol. Chem. 276: 37993-38001.
-converting enzyme cleaves the macrophage CSF receptor in macrophages undergoing activation. J. Immunol. 166: 1583-1589.
converting enzyme is involved in regulated
-secretase cleavage of the Alzheimer amyloid protein precursor. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 27765-27767.
and L-selectin shedding from leukocyte membranes. Antisense Nucleic Acid Drug Dev. 11: 107-116. [Medline]
convertase (TACE) in ectodomain shedding of the p75 neurotrophin receptor (p75NTR). J. Biol. Chem. 279: 4241-4249.
) regulates epidermal growth factor receptor activation. J. Biol. Chem. 280: 36970-36977.
-converting enzyme (TACE/ADAM17) inactivation in mouse myeloid cells prevents lethality from endotoxin shock. J. Immunol. 179: 2686-2689.
(TNF
) shedding and of the function of the TNF
ectodomain in ensuring selective stimulated shedding by the TNF
convertase (TACE/ADAM17). J. Biol. Chem. 279: 42898-42906.
and other transmembrane proteins is induced by receptor tyrosine kinase activation and MAP kinase signaling cascades. EMBO J. 18: 6962-6972. [Medline]
converting enzyme (TACE) is inhibited by TIMP-3. FEBS Lett. 435: 39-44. [Medline]This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Horiuchi, H. Morioka, H. Takaishi, H. Akiyama, C. P. Blobel, and Y. Toyama Ectodomain Shedding of FLT3 Ligand Is Mediated by TNF-{alpha} Converting Enzyme J. Immunol., June 15, 2009; 182(12): 7408 - 7414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Horiuchi, T. Kimura, T. Miyamoto, K. Miyamoto, H. Akiyama, H. Takaishi, H. Morioka, T. Nakamura, Y. Okada, C. P. Blobel, et al. Conditional Inactivation of TACE by a Sox9 Promoter Leads to Osteoporosis and Increased Granulopoiesis via Dysregulation of IL-17 and G-CSF J. Immunol., February 15, 2009; 182(4): 2093 - 2101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |