|
|
||||||||
Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Spanish National Research Council and University of Valladolid School of Medicine, Valladolid, Spain
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(cPLA2
) and the group V sPLA2 (sPLA2-V) (6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20). There is general consensus that cPLA2
is the critical enzyme in AA release (21, 22, 23), whereas sPLA2-V may participate by amplifying the cPLA2
-mediated process by various mechanisms (4, 24, 25, 26). Definitive genetic evidence for this model has been recently provided in murine peritoneal macrophages and mast cells by showing that disruption of the cPLA2
gene nearly abrogates eicosanoid production (12, 27), whereas disruption of the sPLA2-V gene leads to a 3550% reduction in eicosanoid production (18, 20). These results also support the existence of a coordinate action between cPLA2
and sPLA2-V, although the molecular basis of this cross-talk still remains poorly understood. Many potential mechanisms have been proposed, ranging from the cPLA2
regulation of sPLA2 activity by gene induction (11, 28) to sPLA2 regulation of cPLA2
via calcium signaling (29) or during secretion of the sPLA2 (30, 31), through binding to cell membrane proteoglycans or plasma membrane phosphatidylcholine (32, 33, 34, 35, 36). Several lines of investigation have also indicated that sPLA2 enzymes can control the induction of the cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) gene, thus influencing eicosanoid production in an alternate manner. The ability of sPLA2-V to induce COX-2 expression has been clearly documented in LPS-treated P388D1 macrophages (37) and, more recently, in Ag-treated murine mast cells (20). Other sPLA2 enzymes in addition to sPLA2-V have also been found to amplify COX-2 induction when transfected into HEK293 cells (26). In the P388D1 macrophage-like cell system, the regulatory role that sPLA2-V plays on COX-2 induction was found to depend on enzyme activity, thus suggesting that a lipid metabolite arising from the hydrolytic action of sPLA2-V on cell membranes was involved (37). In this study, we describe studies that identify lysophosphatidylcholine (lysoPC) as the sPLA2-V downstream metabolite involved in COX-2 induction in LPS-treated P388D1 macrophages. In addition, our studies highlight a key role for the transcription factor c-Rel in COX-2 induction by lysoPC in P388D1 macrophages.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
P388D1 cells (MAB clone) (11) were provided by Y. Shirai and E. Dennis (University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA). RPMI 1640 medium and FBS were from Invitrogen Life Technologies (5, 6, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14). The [3H]AA (sp. act. 214 Ci/mmol) and [1-14C]oleic acid (OA) (sp. act. 53 mCi/mmol) were from Amersham Ibérica. LPS (Escherichia coli 0111: B4) was from Sigma-Aldrich. Rabbit anti-mouse COX-2 Ab, methyl arachidonyl fluorophosphonate (MAFP), and bromoenol lactone (BEL) were from Cayman Chemical. The 12-Epi-scalaradial and manoalide were from BIOMOL. Both 1-O-octadecyl-2-O-methyl-rac-glycero-3-phosphocholine (methyl-lysoPC) and radicicol were from Calbiochem. c-Rel Ab was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Pyrrophenone was a gift from T. Ono (Shionogi, Osaka, Japan). LY311727 was provided by E. Mihelich (Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN). Pure rat sPLA2-V was provided by A. Aarsman (Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands). All other reagents were from Sigma-Aldrich.
Cell culture and labeling conditions
P388D1 cells were maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere at 95% air and 5% CO2 in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 5% FBS, 2 mM glutamine, 50 U/ml penicillin, and 50 µg/ml streptomycin. P388D1 cells were plated at 106/well, allowed to adhere overnight, and used for experiments the following day. All experiments were conducted in serum-free RPMI 1640 medium. When required, radiolabeling of the P388D1 cells was achieved by including 0.5 µCi/ml [3H]AA or 0.1 µCi/ml [14C]OA during the overnight adherence period (20 h). Labeled fatty acid that had not been incorporated into cellular lipids was removed by washing the cells four times with serum-free medium containing 0.5 mg/ml albumin.
Primary cultures of peritoneal macrophages were established from resident cells from C57BL/6 male mice (University of Valladolid Animal House), as described previously (38, 39). The cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS, 2 mM glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin.
Small interfering RNA (siRNA) inhibition studies
The siRNA directed against sPLA2-V was from Ambion (sequence 5'-CAC GAC UCC UUC UGU CCA AdTdT-3'). The cells (3 x 105/ml) were transiently transfected with oligonucleotide (520 nM) in the presence of 10 µg/ml lipofectamine (Invitrogen Life Technologies) under serum-free conditions for 6 h. Afterward, 5% serum was added and the cells were maintained at normal culture conditions for 20 h. Then the cells were used for experiments, as described above. A scrambled siRNA was used as a negative control.
PLA2 activity measurements
The mammalian membrane assay described by Diez et al. (40) was used. Briefly, aliquots of P388D1 cell homogenates were incubated for 12 h at 37°C in 100 mM HEPES (pH 7.5) containing 1.3 mM CaCl2 and 100,000 dpm of [3H]AA-labeled U937 cell membrane, used as substrate. When cPLA2 activity was measured, the assay contained 25 µM LY311727 and 25 µM BEL to completely inhibit sPLA2 and iPLA2 activities. When sPLA2 activity was measured, the assay contained 1 µM pyrrophenone and 25 µM BEL to completely inhibit cPLA2 and iPLA2 activities. These assay conditions have been validated previously (41, 42, 43, 44, 45).
Immunoblot analyses
Cells were serum starved and stimulated with 100 ng/ml LPS for the periods of time indicated in the presence or absence of the indicated inhibitors. Afterward, the cells were washed and then lysed in a buffer consisting of 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% Triton X-100, 100 µM Na3VO4, 1 mM PMSF, and protease inhibitor mixture (Sigma-Aldrich) at 4°C. Protein was quantified, and a 4-µg aliquot was analyzed by immunoblot exactly as described previously (46, 47), with Abs against murine COX-2 (Cayman).
Measurement of extracellular fatty acid release
The cells were placed in serum-free medium for 1 h before the addition of LPS in the absence or presence of pyrrophenone or scalaradial, and in the presence of 0.5 mg/ml BSA. After the 24-h incubation period, the supernatants were removed, cleared of detached cells by centrifugation, and assayed for radioactivity by liquid scintillation counting.
Transcription factor activity assay
Detection of transcription factor activity was performed with the BD Mercury TransFactor Profiling Kit, Inflammation 1 (BD Clontech), which uses an ELISA-based technique, following the manufacturers instructions.
Other methods
Protein concentration was determined using the Bradford protein assay kit (Bio-Rad) with BSA as a standard. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM of at least three different experiments.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In previous work, we have shown that inhibition of cellular sPLA2-V activity by either antisense oligonucleotide technology or the pharmacological inhibitor LY311727 leads to a markedly reduced induction of COX-2 in LPS-treated P388D1 cells (37). In these experiments, the antisense oligonucleotide and pharmacological approaches that we used failed to produce complete inhibition of cellular sPLA2-V activity (37). Thus, the possibility exists that the partial suppression of COX-2 production that we generally observed (37) was due to incomplete inhibition of cellular sPLA2-V. To address this issue, we devised new strategies to try to block cellular sPLA2-V in a more efficacious manner. In the first place, we used siRNA technology. P388D1 cells were transfected with siRNA-targeting sPLA2-V, exposed to LPS, and then assayed for COX-2 content. Because we have been unable to find reliable Abs against murine sPLA2-V, the efficiency of siRNA knockdown was judged by enzyme activity assay. Treatment with different concentrations of siRNA directed against sPLA2-V induced a dose-dependent inhibition of COX-2 induction, as judged by immunoblot (Fig. 1A). However, as shown in Fig. 1B, the siRNA treatment only partially blocked sPLA2-V expression, and a significant fraction of activity was still present at 20 nM, the highest siRNA concentration that did not promote loss of cell viability. Although these results provide further evidence for the regulatory role of sPLA2-V on COX-2 expression, overall, siRNA technology produced no improvement over previous methods with regard to the abrogation of sPLA2-V expression.
|
|
|
COX-2 expression in mouse peritoneal macrophages
To assess whether the inhibitory effect of scalaradial on the induction of COX-2 in the LPS-treated P388D1 macrophage-like cells is physiologically relevant and not just a peculiarity of the cell line used, we extended our studies to murine peritoneal macrophages. In agreement with the P388D1 cell data, scalaradial markedly inhibited COX-2 expression in LPS-treated peritoneal macrophages in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 4A).
|
on COX-2 induction was also assayed in the murine peritoneal macrophages. For this purpose, we used the inhibitors MAFP and pyrrophenone. Although MAFP is a dual cPLA2/iPLA2 inhibitor (7, 53), pyrrophenone specifically inhibits the cPLA2
(54, 55). Fig. 4B shows that both inhibitors, used at concentrations that completely abrogate cellular cPLA2 activity (41, 42, 43, 44, 45), markedly blunted COX-2 production in the LPS-stimulated mouse macrophages. This is fully consistent with our previous work in the P388D1 cells, in which a functionally active cPLA2
was found to be necessary for the induction of sPLA2-V and subsequent COX-2 production in response to LPS (37). Effect of scalaradial on the release of fatty acids by LPS-stimulated P388D1 cells
Unlike cPLA2
, sPLA2-V does not preferentially hydrolyze AA-containing membrane phospholipids, being able to significantly affect the release of other fatty acids such as OA. In this regard, we previously documented that LPS stimulation of OA release in P388D1 cells requires the hydrolytic action of sPLA2, regulated by cPLA2
(13). In keeping with these data, the LPS-stimulated release of OA from P388D1 was prevented by scalaradial, confirming the involvement of sPLA2 (Fig. 5A). AA release under these conditions was also inhibited by scalaradial, albeit to a lesser degree, i.e., 2030% (Fig. 5B). This level of inhibition is consistent with the recent studies by Arm and colleagues (20) with mice lacking sPLA2-V, who estimated a contribution of sPLA2-V to delayed eicosanoid production of
35%. As expected, cPLA2
inhibition by pyrrophenone strongly inhibited both OA and AA release (Fig. 5), consistent with this enzyme being regulatory for OA release (13, 23), and the primary effector of AA release (22, 23).
|
Collectively, the above results indicate that sPLA2-V-mediated phospholipid hydrolysis occurs during LPS stimulation of P388D1 cells, and that inhibition of sPLA2-V by scalaradial blocks both fatty acid release and COX-2 induction. To study the possible relationship between free fatty acids and COX-2, we studied the effect of exposing the cells to either OA or AA on COX-2 production. Incubation of the cells with various concentrations of OA or AA (up to 100 µM) for various times (up to 24 h) did not induce COX-2 expression in the P388D1 cells. Next, we studied whether the inhibitory effect of scalaradial on LPS-induced COX-2 production could be reversed by the presence of OA or AA. To this end, the cells were incubated with various concentrations of exogenous OA or AA (up to 100 µM), treated with LPS in the presence or absence of scalaradial, and assayed for COX-2 production by immunoblot. The fatty acids were either added 1 h before or at the same time as the LPS. No reversal of the inhibition of COX-2 production by scalaradial could be observed under any condition (results not shown). Collectively, these results indicate that free fatty acids are not the sPLA2-V metabolites involved in COX-2 production.
To study the possible involvement of an oxygenated metabolite of AA instead, LPS-induced COX-2 production was studied in the presence of a variety of general cyclooxygenase or lipoxygenase inhibitors, namely indomethacin, aspirin, ebselen, and baicalein. These compounds were used at concentrations up to 25 µM, and were added to the cells 30 min before the addition of LPS. Neither of the inhibitors tested exerted any effect on the LPS-induced COX-2 production, thus ruling out the participation of an AA metabolite in the process (results not shown).
Given the above results excluding the participation of free fatty acids and/or oxygenated derivatives in LPS-induced COX-2 production, we turned our eyes to the other product of sPLA2-catalyzed phospholipid hydrolysis, i.e., lysophospholipid. Initial experiments indicated that, when added exogenously to the P388D1 macrophage-like cells, lysophospholipids were rapidly metabolized by either acylation or hydrolysis reactions (results not shown). To circumvent this problem, we used the stable lysoPC analog, methyl-lysoPC, which, because of the ether bonds at the sn-1 and sn-2 positions, cannot be hydrolyzed to glycerophosphocholine, or acylated to form phosphatidylcholine. Using this compound, it was possible to greatly overcome the inhibitory actions of scalaradial on LPS-induced COX-2 production. As shown in Fig. 6A, at a concentration of 8 µM, methyl-lysoPC overcame the scalaradial inhibition of COX-2 production by
80%. Importantly, methyl-lysoPC did not have any stimulatory effect by itself, nor did it enhance the LPS-induced COX-2 production in the absence of scalaradial (Fig. 6B). Collectively, these data suggest that methyl-lysoPC did not function through interaction with a surface receptor.
|
inhibitor pyrrophenone on LPS-induced COX-2 was assayed next. Unlike scalaradial, the inhibitory actions of pyrrophenone on COX-2 production were not overcome by methyl-lysoPC (data not shown). Thus, these results demonstrate that it is the lysoPC generated by sPLA2-V, not the one produced by cPLA2
, that is specifically linked to COX-2 production. To explore the possibility that sPLA2-V might generate lysophospholipids by acting extracellularly, lysoPC levels were measured in the supernatants of LPS-stimulated cells in the presence or absence of scalaradial. To this end, cells labeled with 0.5 µCi/ml [3H]choline for 2 days were used (56, 57). After the different treatments, lipids in the supernatants were extracted with ice-cold n-butanol and separated by thin-layer chromatography (56, 57). However, no significant amounts of [3H]lysoPC could be detected in the supernatants of LPS-treated cells vs control-untreated cells at any time, indicating that lysoPC does not accumulate extracellularly under these conditions.
Transcription factors involved in the sPLA2-dependent expression of COX-2
Transcriptional regulation of mouse COX-2 expression is mediated by different regulatory elements that are distributed along the COX-2 promoter sequence. The COX-2 promoter contains a classical TATA box, an E-box, and binding sites for transcription factors such as NF-
B, C/EBP, CREB, AP-1, and NF-AT, all of which have been shown to act as positive regulatory elements for COX-2 transcription in different cell types (58, 59). To study which of these elements may lie downstream of sPLA2-V during LPS stimulation of P388D1 cells, we studied the inhibition of transcription factor activity by scalaradial. In an ELISA-based transcription factor profiling assay, DNA-binding activities of the inflammation-related transcription factors activating transcription factor 2, CREB-1, c-fos, c-Rel, NF-
B p65, and NF-
B p50 were measured in unstimulated or LPS-stimulated P388D1 cells in the presence or absence of scalaradial for 6 h. NF-
B p65, c-fos, and c-Rel were activated by LPS, but only the activation of c-Rel was significantly inhibited by scalaradial and restored by treating the cells with methyl-lysoPC (Fig. 7). Collectively, these results indicate that activation of c-Rel corresponds with COX-2 production in that both processes are inhibited by scalaradial, but inhibition can be overcome by methyl-lysoPC. To confirm that a link actually exists between these two proteins, we studied the effect of radicicol on COX-2 expression (Fig. 8). Radicicol is a fungal metabolite that has previously been demonstrated to inhibit c-Rel transcriptional activity in LPS-treated macrophages by reducing c-Rel expression (60). As shown in Fig. 8, radicicol inhibited in parallel the production of both c-Rel and COX-2 in LPS-treated cells, suggesting that both processes are related.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, highlighting the key role that cPLA2
plays as the primary regulator of the eicosanoid response in LPS-treated macrophages. Importantly, inhibition of COX-2 expression also occurs if sPLA2-V activity is inhibited. Thus, sPLA2-V may serve two different roles during the delayed eicosanoid generation response. sPLA2-V may increase the free AA level that is derived to eicosanoid synthesis by directly hydrolyzing AA-containing phospholipids, and, alternatively, it may amplify the eicosanoid release response by directly regulating the induction of COX-2. In the studies reported in this work, the cell-permeable inhibitor scalaradial strongly inhibited COX-2 expression and OA release, but only modestly blunted AA release. These data may suggest that, under these settings, sPLA2-V amplifies the LPS-mediated delayed eicosanoid response mainly through its effect on COX-2 expression. This would be consistent with recent data in mast cells implicating endogenous sPLA2-V in COX-2 induction in murine mast cells from C57BL mice, but only modestly at best on provision of AA (20). Interestingly, in mast cells from another strain, BALB/c, no role for sPLA2-V in either AA release or COX-2 induction could be found (20). These findings were made by using mice in which the gene encoding sPLA2-V gene had been disrupted (20). Thus, they provide solid evidence that, depending on the genetic background, two different phenotypes may exist in cells regarding the involvement of sPLA2 in eicosanoid generation. Whether these two phenotypes may also manifest in cells depending on culture conditions is unknown at present. In our previous studies, pharmacologic and antisense oligonucleotide evidences were provided to indicate that the enzymatic activity of sPLA2-V is required for COX-2 induction (37), suggesting that a sPLA2-derived metabolite plays an instrumental role in the process. A weakness in our previous studies was that the strategies used inhibited sPLA2-V only partially (37). This adds complexity to the search for the sPLA2-V-downstream metabolite involved, because diminished levels of the metabolite in question could still produce biological effects, as suggested by the finding that reduction of COX-2 under these conditions was always incomplete (37). To circumvent this problem, in this study we have tried new strategies to abrogate sPLA2-V activity. Our attempts at using siRNA have failed to produce quantitative inhibition of sPLA2-V. Thus, in our hands, siRNA technology produced no improvement over previous methods.
Recent work by the Gelb laboratory has raised the possibility that sPLA2 may act inside the cells during secretion rather than outside the cells after secretion has occurred (30, 31). Thus, the authors suggest that the role of sPLA2 in AA mobilization must be investigated before or during secretion of the enzyme (30, 31). In our previous studies, the cell-impermeable indole derivative LY311727 was used (37). Thus, we speculated that one reason for the failure of this inhibitor to produce quantitative effects on COX-2 induction could be that the inhibitor acted only on the fraction of sPLA2-V already outside of the cell, but not on the enzyme acting inside, prior, or during secretion. To test this hypothesis, we used the cell-permeable inhibitor scalaradial. This compound, at concentrations as low as 4 µM, was able to completely block cellular sPLA2 activity and induce a very strong inhibition of COX-2 expression (i.e., always over 90%). Collectively, these data are consistent with a role for intracellular sPLA2-V in COX-2 induction.
As recently discussed elsewhere (31), investigators have usually assumed that sPLA2 functions outside of the cells. This assumption is inferred mainly from earlier findings showing high sPLA2 levels in inflammatory exudates and the biochemical properties of the protein, in particular its high disulfide content. Circulating phagocytes secrete significant amounts of sPLA2 (51, 61), which, eventually, could associate with the cell membranes of the originating or neighboring cells, and/or be reinternalized to exert an hydrolytic action at various cellular sites (16, 25, 33, 62, 63). The ability of sPLA2-V to act on neighboring cells to induce phospholipid hydrolysis at physiological concentrations has been unambiguously demonstrated (29, 36, 64). Importantly, extracellular sPLA2-V may promote AA mobilization from cells lacking cPLA2
, which indicates that, regardless of any secondary effect on cPLA2
, sPLA2-V does indeed have the capacity to affect phospholipid hydrolysis and produce lysoPC on its own (35). These findings, together with the aforementioned results demonstrating intracellular sPLA2 actions before secretion (30, 31), raise the key concept that multiple sites and modes of action may exist for sPLA2-V in cells. Thus, whether sPLA2-V functions transcellularly by a paracrine mechanism or acts on its originating cells by an autocrine mechanism, or simply functions intracellularly before secretion under physiological conditions may ultimately depend on cell type and nature of the stimulus. In this regard, we recently found that in the LPS-treated P388D1 macrophages, sPLA2-V localized in large cytoplasmic granules containing caveolin (16). Localization of sPLA2-V in these granules correlates with the appearance of COX-2 protein, suggesting a cause-effect relationship (11, 16). In our studies, the localization of sPLA2-V in cytoplasmic granules could be partially prevented by treating the cells with heparin, a polysaccharide that sequesters some sPLA2 enzymes in the culture medium, and in this manner, blunts their effects on the cells (16). These data would be compatible with an autocrine role for sPLA2-V in P388D1 cells in that the enzyme, after being secreted to the extracellular medium, would be internalized back to the cells to exert its biological role in an intracellular compartment. However, given that heparin is pleiotropic in its effects, we do not rule out that sPLA2-V exerts its effects on COX-2 before or during secretion.
Although scalaradial is a selective inhibitor of sPLA2, caution needs to be exercised when using this compound, because other enzyme activities could be inhibited as well. At concentrations slightly higher than those required to inhibit sPLA2, scalaradial may also affect the activity of cPLA2
(49, 50). This nonselective action does not appear to participate in the inhibitory effects of scalaradial on LPS-induced COX expression, because scalaradial, at concentrations that inhibit both sPLA2 activity and COX-2 induction (<5 µM), does not affect cellular cPLA2 activity, as measured in an in vitro assay. Additional evidence to support that inhibition of sPLA2-V by scalaradial is responsible for inhibition of COX-2 expression includes the following: 1) the finding that a low concentration of scalaradial that exerts little effect on COX-2 expression in normal cells is able to quantitatively block COX-2 expression in cells expressing lower sPLA2-V levels by siRNA treatment, and 2) the ability of methyl-lysoPC, an analog of the sPLA2-V product lysoPC, to almost completely overcome the inhibitory actions of scalaradial on LPS-induced COX-2 expression. Importantly, methyl-lysoPC does not restore COX-2 expression in pyrrophenone-treated cells, suggesting that it is the lysoPC produced by sPLA2-V that is specifically implicated in COX-2 expression.
The intracellular signaling mechanism by which sPLA2-V-derived lysoPC mediates COX-2 expression is associated with the activation of the transcription factor c-Rel. Using an ELISA-based transcription activity assay, we simultaneously measured the effect of sPLA2-V inhibition on six different transcription factors. The activation of c-fos and c-Rel is inhibited by scalaradial, and of these, only the scalaradial-sensitive c-Rel activation, but not that of c-fos is significantly overcome by treating the cells with methyl-lysoPC. In addition, we show that inhibition of c-Rel expression by radicicol in LPS-treated cells results in a corresponding inhibition of COX-2. Our results, coupled with previous data (11, 37), suggest a model for COX-2 induction in stimulated P388D1 cells whereby LPS first induces sPLA2-V expression in a cPLA2
-dependent manner. sPLA2-V, acting intracellularly either prior/during secretion or in an autocrine manner on the cells that originated it, catalyzes phospholipid hydrolysis leading to lysoPC accumulation, which in turn would be implicated in c-Rel activation leading to COX-2 induction. Collectively, our findings highlight the complexity of the macrophage response to LPS regarding COX-2 expression and suggest a pivotal role for intracellular PLA2 enzymes in regulating this process.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Disclosures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science (Grants BFU2004-01886/BMC and SAF2004-04676), the Fundación La Caixa (Grant BM05-248-0), and the Spanish Ministry of Health (ISCIII-RETIC RD06). ![]()
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Jesús Balsinde, Instituto de Biología y Genética Molecular, Calle Sanz y Forés s/n, 47003 Valladolid, Spain. E-mail address: jbalsinde{at}ibgm.uva.es ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: AA, arachidonic acid; BEL, bromoenol lactone; COX-2, cyclooxygenase-2; cPLA2, cytosolic phospholipase A2; cPLA2
, group IV cPLA2
; iPLA2, Ca2+-independent phospholipase A2; lysoPC, lysophosphatidylcholine; MAFP, methyl arachidonyl fluorophosphonate; methyl-lysoPC, 1-O-octadecyl-2-O-methyl-rac-glycero-3-phosphocholine; OA, oleic acid; PLA2, phospholipase A2; siRNA, small interfering RNA; sPLA2, secreted PLA2; sPLA2-V, group V sPLA2. ![]()
Received for publication January 24, 2007. Accepted for publication April 14, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
reigns supreme in arthritis and bone resorption. Trends Immunol. 25: 116-119. [Medline]
(cPLA2
) and secretory phospholipase A2 (sPLA2) in hydrogen peroxide-induced arachidonic acid release in murine mesangial cells: sPLA2 regulates cPLA2
activity that is responsible for arachidonic acid release. J. Biol. Chem. 278: 24153-24163.
. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 25024-25038.
, pyrrophenone. Biochem. J. 363: 727-735. [Medline]
B/Rel in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated macrophages. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 294: 548-554.
2-integrin-mediated adhesion and synthesis of leukotriene C4 in eosinophils. J. Immunol. 177: 574-582. This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. Ruiperez, A. M. Astudillo, M. A. Balboa, and J. Balsinde Coordinate Regulation of TLR-Mediated Arachidonic Acid Mobilization in Macrophages by Group IVA and Group V Phospholipase A2s J. Immunol., March 15, 2009; 182(6): 3877 - 3883. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Pindado, J. Balsinde, and M. A. Balboa TLR3-Dependent Induction of Nitric Oxide Synthase in RAW 264.7 Macrophage-Like Cells via a Cytosolic Phospholipase A2/Cyclooxygenase-2 Pathway J. Immunol., October 1, 2007; 179(7): 4821 - 4828. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |