The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kovacic, N.
Right arrow Articles by Marusic, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kovacic, N.
Right arrow Articles by Marusic, A.
The Journal of Immunology, 2007, 178: 3379-3389.
Copyright © 2007 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

The Fas/Fas Ligand System Inhibits Differentiation of Murine Osteoblasts but Has a Limited Role in Osteoblast and Osteoclast Apoptosis1

Natasa Kovacic2,*, Ivan Kresimir Lukic*, Danka Grcevic{dagger}, Vedran Katavic*, Peter Croucher{ddagger} and Ana Marusic*

* Department of Anatomy, University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; {dagger} Department of Physiology and Immunology, University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; and {ddagger} Academic Unit of Bone Biology, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, United Kingdom


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
Apoptosis through Fas/Fas ligand (FasL) is an important regulator of immune system homeostasis but its role in bone homeostasis is elusive. We systematically analyzed: 1) the expression of Fas/FasL during osteoblastogenesis and osteoclastogenesis in vitro, 2) the effect of FasL on apoptosis and osteoblastic/osteoclastic differentiation, and 3) osteoblastogenesis and osteoclastogenesis in mice deficient in Fas or FasL. The expression of Fas increased with osteoblastic differentiation. Addition of FasL weakly increased the proportion of apoptotic cells in both osteoclastogenic and osteoblastogenic cultures. In a CFU assay, FasL decreased the proportion of osteoblast colonies but did not affect the total number of colonies, indicating specific inhibitory effect of Fas/FasL on osteoblastic differentiation. The effect depended on the activation of caspase 8 and was specific, as addition of FasL to osteoblastogenic cultures significantly decreased gene expression for runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2) required for osteoblastic differentiation. Bone marrow from mice without functional Fas or FasL had similar osteoclastogenic potential as bone marrow from wild-type mice, but generated more osteoblast colonies ex vivo. These colonies had increased expression of the osteoblast genes Runx2, osteopontin, alkaline phosphatase, bone sialoprotein, osteocalcin, and osteoprotegerin. Our results indicate that Fas/FasL system primarily controls osteoblastic differentiation by inhibiting progenitor differentiation and not by inducing apoptosis. During osteoclastogenesis, the Fas/FasL system may have a limited effect on osteoclast progenitor apoptosis. The study suggests that Fas/FasL system plays a key role in osteoblastic differentiation and provides novel insight into the interactions between the immune system and bone.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
The immune system and bone are anatomically and functionally closely related, sharing common progenitor cells and various cytokine networks (1). Furthermore, development and function of both systems is regulated by apoptosis. Apoptosis is an important regulator of the immune reaction and development of hemopoietic cells and also determines the lifespan and number of bone cells. All osteoclasts and 60–80% of osteoblasts eventually die by apoptosis (2). One of major apoptotic mediators in the immune system is the cell surface receptor Fas (CD95). Binding of Fas ligand (FasL,3 CD95L, CD178) to Fas leads to the recruitment and activation of initiator caspases, such as caspase 8, which start a series of intracellular events culminating in cell death (3). The importance of the Fas/FasL system is reflected in mice lacking functional Fas or FasL who develop a systemic autoimmune disease marked by lymphadenopathy and splenomegaly, production of autoantibodies, and formation of immunocomplexes, lymphoproliferation, and a shortened lifespan (4, 5, 6, 7). We have previously shown that a constitutive component of the phenotype of gld mice, which lack functional FasL, is increased bone mass in vivo and increased number of osteoblasts in vitro (8). gld mice also form more bone and cartilage during endochondral bone formation in vivo (9, 10). Although these studies point to the importance of the Fas/FasL system in the control of bone homeostasis, cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying the bone phenotype in gld mice have not been clarified. As apoptosis of bone cells is a rapid process and cannot be assessed in vivo during bone turnover in a normal adult organism (2), expression and function of the Fas/FasL system on bone cells has been investigated in vitro, with controversial results from different experimental models and methods. Several studies reported constitutive or inducible expression of Fas and FasL on human and mouse osteoblasts (11, 12, 13). The studies on the expression of Fas and FasL on osteoclasts reported both positive (14, 15) and negative (16) findings. To elucidate cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying increased bone formation in vivo in the absence of active Fas, we systematically investigated the expression and activity of Fas and FasL during in vitro osteoblastogenesis and osteoclastogenesis from wild-type murine bone marrow cells, as well as bone marrow cells from mice with a gene knockout for Fas (6) or loss-of-function FasL mutation in gld mice (4). We report here that although Fas is expressed on cells from mature osteoblastogenic and osteoclastogenic cultures, it plays a limited role in the regulation of their apoptosis, but has a novel inhibitory effect on osteoblastic differentiation.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
Mice

Twelve-week-old female C57BL/6J mice, mice homozygous for a mutation in the FasL gene (gld) (4), and mice deficient in the Fas gene (Fas–/–) were used in experiments. Both deficient strains were on the C57BL/6J background. The Fas–/– mice were a gift from Dr. M. Simon (Max Planck Institute for Immunobiology, Freiburg, Germany). Mice homozygous for the gld mutation on a C57BL/6 background were originally obtained from Dr. E. R. Podack (Miami University, Miami, FL). All animal protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Zagreb, School of Medicine (Zagreb, Croatia).

Cell culture

Bone marrow was flushed out of the medullar cavity of long bones from at least six animals per group and used for cell culture. For osteoblastic differentiation, cells were seeded in 6-well culture plates at a density of 3 x 106 cells/well in 3 ml of {alpha}-MEM supplemented with 10% FCS (HyClone) (17). Osteoblastic differentiation was induced by the addition of 50 µg/ml ascorbic acid, 10–8 M dexamethasone, and 8 mM beta-glycerophosphate (termed osteoblastogenic cultures). Osteoblast colonies were identified histochemically by the activity of alkaline phosphatase (AP), using a commercially available kit (Sigma-Aldrich). For the induction of apoptosis, cells were cultured in 24-well culture plates (Corning-Costar), at a density of 1 x 106 cells/well in 0.7 ml {alpha}-MEM with 10% FCS/well. For fluorescence microscopy, cells were plated in 4-well chamber slides at a density of 1 x 106 cells in 0.7-ml culture medium/well. Osteoblast characteristics and purity of cultures were checked on day 14 of osteoblastogenic culture, when AP-positive colonies comprised minimally 75% of total colonies, compared with <20% of AP-positive colonies in cultures without addition of ascorbic acid, dexamethasone, and beta-glycerophosphate. The total number of colonies was determined after destaining for AP with ethanol and subsequent staining with methylene blue.

Osteoclastic differentiation of bone marrow cells was stimulated by the addition of 10 ng/ml of both recombinant mouse (rm) receptor activator of NF-{kappa}B ligand (RANKL) (gift from Amgen) and rmM-CSF (R&D Systems) to the cultures (termed osteoclastogenic cultures). After 6 days of culture, cells with three or more nuclei per cell, stained positively for tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP), were considered osteoclasts and counted per well. Osteoclastic phenotype was further confirmed by quantitative PCR (qPCR) for calcitonin receptor gene expression as a marker of mature osteoclasts (18). Labeling with mAb to RANK was used to confirm the presence of osteoclast progenitors on day 2 of osteoclastogenic culture. At this time point, there were minimally 25% RANK-positive cells, indicating at least 25% osteoclast progenitors. Osteoclasts did not differentiate in cultures without the addition of RANKL and M-CSF and there were <5% of RANK-positive cells on culture day 2, as well as no calcitonin receptor mRNA. For TRAP-staining, cells were cultured in 48-well culture plates (1 x 106 cells in 1 ml {alpha}-MEM with 10% FCS/well). For RNA isolation, flow cytometry for Fas and FasL, and induction of apoptosis, cells were cultured in 24-well culture plates (2 x 106 cells in 1 ml of {alpha}-MEM with 10% FCS/well). For the morphologic estimation of apoptotic cells and immunofluorescence staining of Fas and FasL, cells were cultured in 4-well chamber slides, at a density of 2 x 106 cells in 1 ml of culture medium/well.

Induction of apoptosis

For the induction of apoptosis, 0.5 µg/ml rmFasL and 5 µg/ml mAb to polyhistidine tag (anti-6x-histidine; R&D Systems) required for FasL cross-linking were added to osteoblastogenic and osteoclastogenic cultures on days 6 and 13, and days 2 and 6, respectively, and incubated for 16 h at 37°C. Cells treated with 5 µg/ml mAb to polyhistidine tag or 0.5 µg/ml BSA were used as negative controls. For a positive control, lymph node lymphocytes were stimulated with 2 µg/ml mitogen Con A (Sigma-Aldrich) for 48 h in RPMI 1640/10% FCS at 37°C with 5% CO2. After that lymphocytes were treated with 0.5 µg/ml rmFasL and 5 µg/ml anti-6x-histidine mAb. FasL treatment induced apoptosis in 50–60% of Con A-stimulated T cells, whereas there were <15% of apoptotic cells in cultures treated only with anti-6x-histidine mAb. Furthermore, 1.0 µg/ml rmFasL induced apoptosis of minimally 65% of Jurkat cells. There were <5% of apoptotic Jurkat cells after treatment with anti-6x-histidine mAb only.

For inhibition of caspase 8 activity, cells were preincubated with 20 µM of the caspase 8 inhibitor Z-IETD-FMK (BD Pharmingen) for 30 min at 37°C, and then treated with FasL.

Flow cytometry

Cells (1 x 106) were suspended in 100 µl of PBS with 0.1% NaN3, and incubated with FITC-conjugated anti-Fas mAb (BD Pharmingen), or a PE-conjugated anti-FasL mAb (BD Pharmingen), as well as appropriate isotype control mAb (Syrian hamster IgG 2{lambda}, conjugated with FITC or PE; BD Pharmingen) for 30 min on ice in the dark. To obtain a positive control for anti-Fas and anti-FasL mAb labeling, lymph node lymphocytes were stimulated with 2 µg/ml mitogen Con A (Sigma-Aldrich) for 48 h in RPMI 1640/10% FCS at 37°C with 5% CO2 and analyzed by flow cytometry. Expression of RANK in osteoclast cultures was analyzed by staining with a goat-anti-RANK Ab (R&D Systems) and detecting with a PE-anti-goat Ab. Data for the expression of cell markers were collected on a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using the CellQuest software (BD Biosciences), 2 x 104 events were collected from each sample. Dead and fragmented cells were excluded from the analysis on the basis of their light scatter properties and labeling with propidium iodide (PI). Positively stained populations were delineated using the signal of the isotype control. Annexin V (BD Pharmingen) and PI staining were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Single DNA-strand breaks in apoptotic nuclei were detected using a nick translation (NT) assay (19). The acquired data from 2 x 104 events per sample were analyzed using the CellQuest software (BD Biosciences).

Immunofluorescence

For in situ immunofluorescence analysis of Fas or FasL expression and apoptosis detection, bone marrow cells were cultured in chamber slides. Cells were washed with 0.5 ml of PBS, fixed in 4% formaldehyde in PBS for 15 min, washed again with PBS, and then nonspecific binding was blocked by incubation for 15 min with a 3% solution of BSA in PBS. Cells were then incubated with anti-Fas or anti-FasL mAb diluted 1/100 in 3% BSA in PBS for 30 min at room temperature (RT). After three washes with PBS, cell nuclei were stained with 2 µg/ml 4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Sigma-Aldrich) for 15 min. Apoptosis was detected by examining the morphology of cell nuclei stained with DAPI, membrane binding of annexin V, and staining of nuclei by the NT method (19). In osteoclastogenic cultures, only cells with three or more nuclei were analyzed.

Fas and FasL ELISA

Cultured cells were lysed for 1 h on ice in buffer (300 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-Cl, 0.5% Triton-X 100 (pH 7.6)) containing protease inhibitors (Protease Inhibitor Cocktail Tablets; Roche). After centrifugation at 1,500 x g for 15 min at 4°C, the supernatant was collected and centrifuged again for 15 min at 14,000 x g at 4°C. Protein concentration in the samples was determined using a commercial kit (BCA protein assay; Pierce Biotechnology). The concentration of Fas and FasL proteins in cell lysates was determined using commercial kits (Quantikine, Mouse Fas and Fas Ligand Immunoassays; R&D Systems). Briefly, samples were added to Fas- or FasL-specific mAb-precoated plates and incubated for 2 h at RT on a horizontal orbital microplate shaker, washed five times, and incubated for the next 2 h with HRP-conjugated Fas or FasL-specific Ab. After further washing, the reaction was visualized with tetramethylbenzidine and arrested with hydrochloric acid. OD was determined within 15 min, on a microplate reader (Bio-Rad) set to 450 nm excitation wavelength.

Gene expression analysis

Total RNA was extracted from cultured cells using a commercial kit (TriPure; Roche). For PCR amplification, 2 µg of total RNA was converted to cDNA by reverse transcriptase (Applied Biosystems). The amount of cDNA corresponding to 20 ng of reversely transcribed RNA was amplified by qPCR, using specific amplimer sets designed by Primer Express software (Applied Biosystems) for beta-actin (sense, 5'-CATTGCTGACAGGATGCAGAA-3', antisense, 5'-GCTGATCCACATCTGCTGGA-3'); RANK (sense, 5'-GACACTGAGGAGACCACCCAA-3', antisense, 5'-ACAACGGTCCCCTGAGGACT-3'); RANKL (sense, 5'-TGCAGCATCGCTCTGTTCC-3', antisense, 5'-CCCACAATGTGTTGCAGTTCC-3'); M-CSF receptor (c-fms) (sense, 5'-AGTCCACGGCTCATGCTGAT-3', antisense, 5'-TAGCTGGAGTCTCCCTCGGA-3'); and osteocalcin (OC) (sense, 5'-CAAGCAGGAGGGCAATAAGGT-3', antisense, 5'-AGGCGGTCTTCAAGCCATACT-3'), with SYBR Green chemistry (SYBR Green Master Mix; Applied Biosystems). Expression of Fas, Fasl, runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2), AP, osteopontin, bone sialoprotein (BSP), osteoprotegerin (OPG), and calcitonin receptor was analyzed using commercially available TaqMan Assays (two primers and Fam/Mgb-labeled probe; Applied Biosystems) and TaqMan chemistry. Quantitative PCR was conducted using an ABI Prism 7000 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems). Each reaction was performed in duplicate or triplicate in a 25-µl reaction volume (8). The generated data were analyzed by plotting the normalized fluorescence receptor signal ({Delta}Rn) vs the cycle number. An arbitrary threshold was set on the linear phase midpoint of the log {Delta}Rn vs cycle number plot. The cycle threshold (Ct) value was defined as the cycle number at which {Delta}Rn crossed this threshold. The expression of specific genes was calculated according to the standard curve of gene expression in the calibrator sample (cDNA from osteoblastogenic or osteoclastogenic culture) and normalized to the expression of the gene for beta-actin ("endogenous" control) (8).

Data analysis and interpretation

All experiments were repeated three times and the results from a representative experiment are presented. Results were expressed as the mean ± SD of TRAP-positive osteoclast number in 6 wells of a 48-well plate and osteoblast or total colony number in three wells of a 6-well plate. Differences in the number of osteoclasts or osteoblast colonies between B6, Fas–/–, and gld mice were analyzed by ANOVA or t test.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
Moderate expression of Fas and weak expression of FasL during osteoblastic differentiation

Expression of Fas and FasL was first analyzed by flow cytometry (Fig. 1, A and B). Anti-Fas mAb-labeled ~30% of freshly isolated bone marrow cells. During the first few days of osteoblastogenic culture, the proportion of cells expressing Fas decreased below 5%, and then increased to 30% after day 7, remaining unchanged until the end of culture (day 17). Anti-FasL mAb also labeled ~30% of freshly isolated bone marrow cells and after that <5% of cells up to culture day 9. FasL membrane expression peaked on day 11 of osteoblastogenic culture, when it was found on 30% cells, and then decreased with osteoblastic differentiation to <10% of cells. The signal obtained by both anti-Fas and anti-FasL mAbs was weak, suggesting low expression of Fas and FasL per cell (Fig. 1A, two left panels). Weak signal was apparent in comparison with the clear signal obtained on activated T lymphocytes used as a positive control (Fig. 1A, two right panels). Total Fas protein content was low during the early stages of osteoblastic differentiation, and increased in mature cells of osteoblastogenic culture (days 14 and 17, Fig. 1C). Both Fas and FasL were present in freshly isolated bone marrow (day 0), but FasL level decreased after day 0 and remained low until the end of culture (Fig. 1C). The expression of mRNA for Fas and Fasl, by qPCR, was in accordance with protein expression by ELISA and revealed low Fas and Fasl gene expression in osteoblastogenic cultures (Fig. 1D). The difference in the Ct between Fas/Fasl and beta-actin was ~15 cycles for Fas and 20 cycles for Fasl, indicating a 215- and 2020-fold lower expression, respectively, compared with the expression of beta-actin. Early in osteoblastogenic cultures, the expression of Fas mRNA was low but it increased later in the culture course, whereas expression of Fasl mRNA was continuously low throughout osteoblastic differentiation (Fig. 1D).


Figure 1
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 1. Expression of Fas and FasL during osteoblastic and osteoclastic differentiation in vitro. A, Representative histograms of cells from osteoblastogenic and osteoclastogenic cultures, and Con A-stimulated lymph node lymphocytes (T ly), labeled with mAbs to Fas (anti-Fas-FITC) or FasL (anti-FasL-PE). B, Proportion of cells in osteoblastogenic cultures labeled with mAbs to Fas or FasL. Labeled cells were delineated according to the signal from isotype control mAbs. Day 0 represents Fas/FasL expression on freshly isolated bone marrow cells. Statistics: p < 0.05 (ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc test); *, FasL expression vs days 4, 7, 9, 14, and 17; **, FasL expression vs days 0, 9, 11, and 14; ***, Fas expression vs days 0, 9, 11, 14, and 17. C, Fas/FasL protein concentration in osteoblastogenic cultures, determined by ELISA and normalized to total protein content. Statistics: p < 0.05 (ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc test); *, FasL expression vs all other time points; **, Fas expression vs days 0, 4, 7, 9, and 11. D, Expression of Fas/Fasl mRNA in osteoblastogenic cultures. Expression was calculated according to the standard curve for Fas/Fasl expression in the calibrator sample (cDNA from osteoblastogenic culture) and normalized to the mRNA quantity for beta-actin ("endogenous" control). Statistics: p < 0.001 (t test); *, Fasl expression vs all other time points; **, Fas expression vs days 0, 9, 11, 14, and 17; ***, Fas expression vs all other time points. E, Proportion of cells in osteoclastogenic cultures labeled with mAb to Fas or FasL. Labeled cells were delineated according to the signal from isotype control mAbs. Day 0 represents Fas/FasL expression on freshly isolated bone marrow cells. Statistics: p < 0.05 (ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc test); *, Fas and FasL expression vs all other time points; **, Fas expression vs days 0, 2, and 4. F, Fas/FasL protein concentration in osteoclastogenic cultures, determined by ELISA and normalized to total protein content. Statistics: p < 0.05 (ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls post-hoc test); *, Fas expression vs days 0, 4, and 9; **, FasL expression vs all other time points. G, Fas/Fasl mRNA expression in osteoclastogenic cultures. Expression was calculated according to the standard curve for Fas/Fasl expression in the calibrator sample (cDNA from osteoclastogenic culture) and normalized to the mRNA quantity of beta-actin ("endogenous" control). Statistics: p < 0.001 (t test); *, Fasl expression vs all other time points; **, Fas expression vs days 0, 4, and 7. H, Representative micrographs of mature osteoclasts on day 6 of culture (original magnification, x200), labeled with mAbs to Fas or FasL; PH, phase contrast image of the same field. Arrows indicate osteoclasts. Results represent arithmetic means (±SD) of percentages of mAb-labeled cells from three experiments (B and E); arithmetic means (±SD) of duplicate samples analyzed by ELISA (C and F); or arithmetic means (±SD) of qPCR triplicates prepared from the same sample (D and G).

 
Weak expression of Fas and FasL during osteoclastic differentiation

During osteoclastic differentiation, membrane expression of Fas was continuously weak (Fig. 1A, two middle panels), compared with the signal of corresponding isotype controls and activated T lymphocytes (Fig. 1A, two right panels). Anti-Fas mAb stained 30% of freshly isolated bone marrow cells (day 0) and ~20% of cells on culture day 2, whereas anti-FasL mAb labeled 30% of freshly isolated bone marrow cells and up to 15% of cells from mature osteoclastogenic cultures (Fig. 1E). ELISA revealed varying levels of Fas and low levels of FasL during the culture (Fig. 1F). Fas and Fasl mRNA expression was also low, ~220- and 219-fold lower than that of beta-actin and corresponded to the expression levels observed by ELISA (Fig. 1G). Immunofluorescence staining of osteoclastogenic cultures grown in chamber slides revealed no expression of Fas and FasL on mature osteoclasts but rather on surrounding nonosteoclastic cells (Fig. 1H).

Activation of Fas induces apoptosis of minor proportion of cells from osteoblastogenic and osteoclastogenic cultures

After confirming the presence of Fas in bone cell cultures, we tested the ability of expressed Fas to mediate apoptosis. Spontaneous apoptosis occurred during osteoblastic differentiation in vitro, with ~8% apoptotic cells on day 7 and no increase after the addition of FasL (Fig. 2). On day 14, the proportion of spontaneously apoptotic cells was 20–25%, and the addition of FasL increased this fraction of apoptotic cells by additional 10–15% compared with control cells. The proportion of dead (i.e., necrotic) cells also increased by 5–10% upon addition of FasL (Fig. 2B).


Figure 2
View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 2. Proportion of apoptotic cells after addition of rmFasL during osteoblastic differentiation in vitro. Osteoblastogenic cultures were treated with 0.5 µg/ml rmFasL and 5 µg/ml anti-polyhistidine mAb (anti-6x-his) on day 6 or 13 after seeding, for 16 h. Control cells were treated with 5 µg/ml anti-6x-his or 0.5 µg/ml BSA. The proportion of apoptotic cells was determined by annexin VFITC combined with PI labeling or the NT method where apoptotic cells were labeled with avidin-FITC. Cell treatment was performed in triplicate and pooled for flow cytometric analysis. A, The ratio of apoptotic cells in cultures treated with BSA, anti-6x-his, or FasL, normalized to cultures treated with BSA (mean ± SD of three repeated experiments). B, Representative data of the annexin VFITC labeling of apoptotic cells. Numbers represent percentages of cells in each quadrant and apoptotic cells are in the lower right quadrant.  

 
During osteoclastic differentiation in vitro, 5–15% of control cells were labeled with annexin V on flow cytometry (Fig. 3). The proportion of annexin V-labeled cells increased 2- to 3-fold on day 3 of osteoclastogenic culture after treatment with FasL (Fig. 3) while addition of FasL did not have a significant effect on the proportion of apoptotic cells on day 7 of osteoclastogenic culture. These results showed similar pattern when using the NT method, although the increase in the proportion of apoptotic cells on day 3 was less prominent (Fig. 3A).


Figure 3
View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 3. Proportion of apoptotic cells induced by rmFasL during osteoclastic differentiation in vitro. Osteoclastogenic cultures were treated with 0.5 µg/ml rmFasL and 5 µg/ml anti-polyhistidine mAb (anti-6x-his) on day 2 or 6 after seeding, for 16 h. Control cells were treated with 5 µg/ml anti-6x-his or 0.5 µg/ml BSA. The proportion of apoptotic cells was determined by annexin VFITC binding combined with PI staining, or the NT method where apoptotic cells were labeled with avidin-FITC. Cell treatment was performed in four wells and pooled for flow cytometric analysis. A, The ratio of apoptotic cells in cultures treated with BSA, anti-6x-his, or FasL normalized to cultures treated with BSA (mean ± SD of three repeated experiments; *, p < 0.05 vs control groups, ANOVA, and the Student-Newman-Keuls post-hoc test). B, Representative data of the annexin V labeling of apoptotic cells. Numbers represent percentages of cells in each quadrant and apoptotic cells are in the lower right quadrant.

 
As osteoblasts and osteoclasts are adherent cells, their removal from the plastic substrate of the culture dish may damage the cell membrane and result in annexin V labeling of damaged nonapoptotic cells. To explore this possibility, we cultured both cell types on chamber slides, labeled them in situ with annexin V or NT, and examined their morphology (20). Using this approach, we found very few spontaneously apoptotic cells. The addition of FasL induced an weak and non significant increase in the number of apoptotic cells on day 14 of osteoblastogenic culture, and at both analyzed time points in osteoclastogenic cultures (Table I).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table I. Induction of apoptosis by rmFasL during osteoblastic and osteoclastic differentiation in vitroa

 
Treatment with FasL suppresses osteoblastic but not osteoclastic differentiation

In the previous set of experiments, we observed that the addition of FasL-induced apoptosis of only a small population of cells committed to the osteoblast lineage. To estimate whether FasL treatment would affect the final osteoblast number, we treated osteoblastogenic cultures with FasL during their differentiation in vitro, and analyzed the number of osteoblast colonies, visualized by AP staining, and total colonies, visualized by methylene blue staining. FasL treatment significantly reduced the number of osteoblast colonies but not total colonies (Fig. 4A). The reduction in the number of osteoblast colonies was most prominent when FasL was present continuously in the culture (Fig. 4A). Single treatment with FasL on day 10 also reduced the number of osteoblast colonies as well as on day 12, without influencing the number of total colonies (Fig. 4A). FasL treatment was ineffective in osteoblastogenic cultures of bone marrow from Fas gene knockout mice (Fig. 4B), confirming the specificity of the ligand-receptor interaction.


Figure 4
View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 4. Effect of FasL on osteoblastic differentiation in vitro. Osteoblastogenic cultures were treated with 0.5 µg/ml rmFasL and 5 µg/ml anti-polyhistidine mAb (anti-6x-his) on days 5, 10, and 12. Cells treated only with 5 µg/ml anti-6x-his were used as a negative control. All experiments were repeated three times. A, FasL decreases formation of osteoblast colonies. Upper panels, Osteoblast colonies on day 14 of cell culture, stained for AP (red); lower panels, total colonies stained with methylene blue (blue). Histograms represent the number of osteoblast and total colonies per square centimeter plate surface (mean ± SD, n = 3; *, p < 0.05 vs control group, t test). B, Effect of rmFasL on osteoblastogenesis from wild-type mice (C57BL/6, B6) and Fas knockout mice (Fas–/–). Left panels, Osteoblast colonies on day 14 of cell culture, stained for AP (red); right panels, total colonies stained with methylene blue (blue). Histograms represent the number of osteoblast and total colonies per centimeter plate surface (mean ± SD, n = 3; *, p < 0.05 vs control group, t test). C, Caspase 8 inhibitor suppresses the effect of rmFasL on osteoblastogenesis in B6 mice. Thirty minutes before addition of FasL cells were treated with 20 µM caspase 8 inhibitor. Left panels, Osteoblast colonies on day 14 of cell culture, stained for AP (red); right panels, total colonies stained with methylene blue (blue). Histograms represent the number of osteoblast and total colonies per centimeter plate surface (mean ± SD, n = 3; *, p < 0.05 vs control group, t test). D, Expression of Runx2 in osteoblastogenic cultures after treatment with rmFasL. Values were calculated according to the standard curve of gene expression in the calibrator sample (cDNA from osteoblastogenic cultures) and normalized to the expression of the gene for beta-actin ("endogenous" control). Results are arithmetic means ± SD of qPCR triplicates prepared from the same sample. Cell treatment was performed minimally in duplicate wells (*, p ≤ 0.05 vs control group, t test).

 
To establish whether the activation of the caspase pathway was involved in the inhibition of osteoblastic differentiation, we tested whether the activity of caspase 8, the first downstream enzyme activated upon ligand binding to Fas, is necessary for transduction of the apoptotic signal (21). FasL treatment was ineffective in decreasing the number of osteoblast colonies when the cells were preincubated with the inhibitor of caspase 8 Z-IETD-FMK before FasL treatment (Fig. 4C), confirming the involvement of the caspase 8 in the effect of FasL on osteoblastic differentiation. FasL treatment, with subsequent activation of caspases, had a direct inhibitory effect on osteoblastic differentiation because it suppressed the expression of Runx2 (Fig. 4D), a transcription factor required for commitment of bone marrow progenitors to the osteoblast lineage (22).

In contrast to its effect on osteoblastic differentiation, FasL had no effect on osteoclast number (377.5 ± 75.0 TRAP-positive osteoclasts in FasL-treated wells vs 403.3 ± 77.8 in control wells; p = 0.29, t test, n = 6 wells/group from a representative of three repeated experiments).

Absence of Fas or FasL stimulates osteoblastic differentiation

To confirm that Fas/FasL system is directly involved in the regulation of osteoblastic differentiation, we cultured bone marrow from mice with a gene knockout for Fas (Fas–/–) (6) or with spontaneous loss-of-function mutation in Fasl gene (gld mice) (4). Bone marrow from both Fas–/– and gld mice had greater osteoblastogenic potential than bone marrow from B6 control mice, with Fas–/– bone marrow forming significantly more osteoblast colonies than gld bone marrow (Fig. 5A). At the same time, there was no difference among B6, gld, or Fas–/– mice in the proportion of apoptotic cells in osteoblastogenic cultures, detected by either the annexin V labeling or NT method (Fig. 5B). The expression of several gene markers for osteoblastic differentiation was significantly increased in Fas–/– bone marrow cultures compared with control B6 cultures (Fig. 5C). The expression of Runx2, an early marker of osteoblast lineage commitment (23) was higher in osteoblastogenic cultures from Fas–/– bone marrow than in osteoblastogenic cultures from gld or B6 bone marrow. The same was true for other osteoprogenitor markers, AP and BSP (24, 25). The expression of OC, marker of mature osteoblasts (26), was highest in Fas–/– mature osteoblastogenic cultures. We also tested the expression of OPG, a soluble decoy receptor for RANKL produced by osteoblasts (27), and increased in bone tissue of gld mice as a part of their bone phenotype (8). OPG expression was higher and occurred earlier in osteoblastogenic cultures from Fas–/– and gld mice than in B6 mice. The expression of RANKL (27) was slightly but not significantly lower in immature osteoblastogenic cultures from Fas–/– or gld mice, compared with B6 mice, but unchanged in mature osteoblastogenic cultures.


Figure 5
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 5. Deficiency of Fas or FasL in vivo enhances osteoblastogenesis. Osteoblastogenic cultures were prepared from bone marrow of wild-type mice (C57BL/6, B6), mice without functional FasL (gld) and Fas knockout mice (Fas–/–). All experiments were repeated three times. A, Osteoblast colonies on day 14 of cell culture, stained for AP (red). Histogram represents the number of osteoblast colonies per centimeter plate surface (mean ± SD, n = 3; ANOVA and the Student-Newman-Keuls post-hoc test; *, p < 0.05 vs B6 and Fas–/– mice; **, vs B6 and gld mice). B, Ratio of apoptotic cells in cultures from B6, gld, or Fas–/– mice normalized to apoptotic cells from B6 mice (mean ± SD of three repeated experiments). The proportion of apoptotic cells was determined by NT where apoptotic cells were labeled with avidin-FITC and Annexin VFITC binding. For each group, cells were cultured in triplicates pooled for flow cytometry analysis. C, Gene expression pattern during in vitro osteoblastic differentiation. For each time point in each group, cells were cultured in triplicates pooled for RNA isolation. Day 0 represents gene expression in freshly isolated bone marrow cells. Values were calculated according to the standard curve of gene expression in the calibrator sample (cDNA from osteoblastogenic culture) and normalized to the expression of the gene for beta-actin ("endogenous" control). Results are arithmetic means ± SD of qPCR triplicates prepared from the same sample. Statistics: p < 0.001 (t test); *, vs B6 and gld mice; **, vs Fas–/– and gld mice; ***, vs B6 mice.

 
Absence of Fas or FasL does not influence osteoclastic differentiation but increases osteoclast number

Bone marrow cultures from Fas–/– mice, but not gld mice, formed more TRAP-positive osteoclasts than those from control B6 mice, indicating an inhibitory effect of Fas on the proliferation of osteoclast precursors (Fig. 6A). There were no differences in the number of apoptotic cells on days 3 and 7 of osteoclastogenic cultures from gld or Fas–/– mice, in comparison with wild-type mice. Only on day 7, annexin V labeling revealed a small nonsignificant reduction in the proportion of apoptotic cells in osteoclastogenic cultures from Fas–/– mice (Fig. 6B). The expression of genes related to the osteoclastic differentiation was similar in all three groups of mice (Fig. 6C), indicating that the Fas/FasL system does not have an effect on osteoclastic differentiation.


Figure 6
View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 6. Deficiency of Fas in vivo enhances osteoclastogenesis. Osteoclastogenic cultures were prepared from bone marrow of wild-type mice (C57BL/6, B6), mice without functional FasL (gld) and Fas knockout mice (Fas–/–). All experiments were repeated three times. A, Osteoclasts (mean ± SD, n = 6; t test, *, p < 0.02 vs B6 mice) on day 6 of cell culture, stained red histochemically for the activity of TRAP. B, Ratio of apoptotic cells in cultures from B6, gld, or Fas–/– mice normalized to apoptotic cells from B6 mice (mean ± SD of three repeated experiments). The proportion of apoptotic cells was determined by NT where apoptotic cells were labeled with avidin-FITC and annexin VFITC binding. Cells were cultured in quadruplicate for each group and pooled for flow cytometric analysis. C, Gene expression pattern in osteoclastogenic cultures from B6, gld, and Fas–/– mice. For each time point in each group, cells were cultured in quadruplicate and pooled for RNA isolation. Day 0 represents gene expression in freshly isolated bone marrow cells. Values were calculated according to the standard curve of gene expression in the calibrator sample (cDNA from osteoclastogenic cultures) and normalized to the expression of the gene for beta-actin ("endogenous" control). Results are arithmetic means ± SD of qPCR triplicates prepared from the same sample. c-fms, M-CSF receptor; CTR, calcitonin receptor.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
The results of the present study demonstrated a novel nonapoptotic action of Fas/FasL system in bone. Activation of Fas by its ligand inhibited commitment and differentiation of osteoblasts from bone marrow, without affecting the differentiation of osteoclasts from the same source of bone marrow. The inhibitory effect on osteoblastogenesis was demonstrated by the inhibition of differentiation after addition of FasL to osteoblastogenic cultures in vitro and by increased osteoblastic differentiation in bone marrow from mice with a gene knockout for Fas or loss-of-function mutation of Fasl. At the same time, apoptosis by Fas/FasL was not a dominant apoptotic mechanism for either osteoblasts or osteoclasts generated from normal bone marrow, as only approximately a third of cells from mature osteoblastogenic cultures and 10% of cells from mature osteoclastogenic cultures showed constitutive expression of Fas and weakly expressed FasL. Absence of this inhibitory effect on osteoblastic differentiation and, to a lesser extent, lack of apoptosis-inducing activity is thus at least partly responsible for the increased bone mass observed in the FasL mutation phenotype of gld, mice (8), and Fas–/– mice (our unpublished results).

Detailed analysis of mediators of bone cell apoptosis is possible only in vitro because the apoptotic removal of osteoblasts and osteoclasts in vivo is a very rapid process and cannot be monitored well in intact bones (2). Weak expression of Fas on ~30% of cells from freshly isolated bone marrow could be assigned to the cells of the erythroid, myelomonocytic or lymphoid lineages, which are known to express Fas (28, 29). In our culture conditions, according to the flow cytometry data, Fas was weakly expressed on 20–30% cells from the mature osteoblastogenic cultures, with little or no expression of Fas during early stages of osteoblastic differentiation. Because Fas protein content was low in osteoblastogenic cultures and corresponded to the low expression pattern of Fas mRNA, a considerable percentage of cells that expressed Fas by flow cytometry may be explained by accumulation of Fas in a limited cell population. In addition, the intensity of fluorescence detected by flow cytometry within this population was low, indicating a weak expression of Fas per cell. Moderate membrane expression of Fas on osteoblasts has been reported in other human and mouse in vitro models (Refs. 11 , 12 , 30 , and the Genome Anatomy Project for the Osteoprogenitor Lineage: http://skeletalbiology. uchc.edu/30_ResearchProgram/304_gap/index.htm).

Very low constitutive expression of the Fasl gene in osteoblastogenic cultures from normal mouse bone marrow in our study is supported by similar results from gene chip analysis of primary mouse osteoblasts (Genome Anatomy Project for the Osteoprogenitor Lineage: http://skeletalbiology.uchc.edu/30_ResearchProgram/304_gap/index.htm and Ref. 30). Despite very low mRNA expression compared with the ubiquitously expressed beta-actin (Ct values between 18 and 20 cycles greater than for beta-actin, depending on the time point), as well as low FasL protein content, we found FasL on the membrane of 10–30% cells from osteoblastogenic cultures. This finding may again be explained by accumulation of FasL within a small cell population.

Since the addition of FasL induced apoptosis in a small proportion (<15%) of cells from mature osteoblastogenic cultures, apoptosis through the Fas/FasL system seems to be only partially responsible for the apoptotic removal of mature osteoblasts (2). Furthermore, our data showed that all cells in osteoblastogenic cultures were not equally sensitive to apoptosis. Even when they expressed Fas (~30% cells on osteoblastogenic culture day 14), the addition of FasL at the same time point was able to induce apoptosis in only 15% of cells or less. Although cells in osteoblastogenic cultures were relatively resistant to Fas-induced apoptosis, cultures treated with FasL had a significantly lower osteoblastic differentiation in vitro. This effect was not the result of decreased cell proliferation, as the number of total colonies in FasL-treated cultures was similar to that in control cultures. Lower osteoblastogenesis in vitro may rather be a result of specific inhibition of differentiation, as shown by the decrease in the number of differentiated osteoblast colonies and down-regulation of Runx2, a transcription factor necessary for the commitment of mesenchymal stem cells to the osteoblast lineage (22). The inhibitory effect of FasL on osteoblastogenesis was specific for the Fas/FasL interaction, because it was absent in osteoblastogenic cultures from mice without functional Fas. This finding is important because it confirmed that Fas is crucial for the FasL regulation of osteoblastic differentiation.

Involvement of Fas in the cellular activation has been previously shown on human HEK293 cells (31) and those processes were initiated by caspases, which are primary effectors of apoptosis. Caspase 8 has been shown to be required for normal function of myeloid and B cell precursors in bone marrow and for maturation of macrophages in the presence of M-CSF (32). Our results indicate that activation of caspase 8 may also be involved in the transmission of the inhibitory Fas/FasL effect on osteoblastic differentiation, as the inhibition of caspase 8 activity abrogated the effect of FasL on osteoblastogenesis.

Alteration in the differentiation of cells of the osteoblast lineage was less prominent in mice deficient in FasL than in those with Fas deficiency. Fas-deficient mice used in our experiments were produced by a gene knockout for the Fas gene and had full penetration of the phenotype (6), whereas FasL-deficient mice are spontaneous gld mutants (4). Incomplete penetration of a spontaneous mutation has been described for the lpr mouse strain which carries a spontaneous mutation for Fas (33). There is no specific study confirming the completeness of penetration of the gld mutation, but more severe autoimmune syndrome in Fasl knockout mice than in gld mice (7) favors incomplete penetration of the spontaneous mutation. A recent systematic study on the interactions between TNF and TNFR superfamily members could not identify ligands for Fas other than FasL (34). However, Balkow et al. (35) observed the presence of apoptotic cells in the liver of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus-infected gld mice, and suggested the possibility of an undiscovered ligand that may trigger Fas-mediated apoptosis. This may be an alternative explanation for the smaller effect on osteoblastogenesis and unaltered osteoclast numbers observed in gld mice in our study.

Constitutive expression and activity of the Fas/FasL system on cells in osteoclastogenic cultures was limited in our experimental model, contrasting the reports from some research groups, such as Wu et al. (14), who described a strong expression of Fas on mouse osteoclasts. However, their culture conditions included 5-fold higher doses of RANKL for the stimulation of osteoclastogenesis than in our culture system. RANKL is necessary for osteoclastic differentiation in culture, but higher doses may increase Fas expression on osteoclast progenitors (36). Our findings are similar to that of Park et al. (15), who described weak expression of both Fas and FasL on osteoclasts, and of Ogawa et al. (16), who could not detect Fas on mature mouse osteoclasts. Similarly to Ogawa, who detected Fas only on the surrounding lymphocytes in culture, anti-Fas mAb-labeled cells in osteoclastogenic cultures in our study were small supportive stromal-like cells, and not osteoclasts. However, addition of FasL to cell cultures in our study did not affect the number of osteoclasts, which contrasts with the finding of enhanced osteoclastogenesis after FasL treatment reported by Park et al. (15) and ascribed to the stimulation of IL-1beta and TNF-{alpha} production (15). Such differences may be explained by the higher amount of RANKL, which, in turn may increase production of IL-1 (37). We believe that our in vitro cultures are more likely to resemble physiological in vivo conditions, in which cytokines are effective in picomolar concentrations. Despite the fact that FasL treatment did not affect osteoclastogenesis in vitro, TRAP-positive osteoclastic cell number was increased in Fas-deficient mice, and the proportion of apoptotic cells in osteoclastogenic cultures from Fas- or FasL-deficient mice was only weakly decreased. Because osteoclast progenitors comprise a minor proportion of hemopoietic bone marrow cells, the effect of single dose of FasL in vitro may not be noticeable. Another explanation may lie in the fact that osteoclast progenitors are susceptible to FasL-induced apoptosis only at a certain stage of development (possibly at the stage of GM-CFU before exposure to RANKL) and those cells could not be investigated in our culture conditions. This is supported by the finding that the number of apoptotic cells increased after the addition of FasL early to the osteoclastogenic culture. However, prolonged deficiency of FasL in vivo may cause accumulation of osteoclast progenitors in bone marrow and subsequent increase in osteoclastogenesis ex vivo. Taken together, our results favor the explanation that Fas/FasL has a limited role in the apoptosis of osteoclast progenitors, while having no direct effect on osteoclastic differentiation.

In conclusion, the Fas/FasL system, although an important regulator of the immune system, is only partially involved in the apoptotic death of bone cells or their progenitors. Rather, it has a direct and specific regulatory effect on osteoblastic differentiation. This finding provides an important contribution to the understanding of the functional interactions between anatomically adjacent hemopoietic and bone/stromal compartments in the bone marrow. FasL expressed on differentiating hemopoietic cells may directly regulate osteoblastic differentiation, which in turn constitutes an important part of the hemopoietic stem cell niche (38). During inflammatory conditions, a decrease in osteoblastic differentiation and subsequent bone loss may be caused by increased Fas/FasL activity in the immune system, where the immune reaction is restricted by Fas/FasL-mediated apoptosis primarily in CTL. Direct regulatory effect on osteoblastic differentiation may also be a potential target for therapeutic modulation of the Fas/FasL system. In the approaches aimed at stimulation of Fas/FasL-induced apoptosis, such as in antitumor therapy (39), the inhibitory effect of this system on osteoblastic differentiation must be addressed. In contrast, therapeutic strategies to reduce Fas/FasL-induced apoptosis, such as in autoimmunity (40), may have an important protective effect on bone.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr. Markus M. Simon (Institute for Immunobiology, Freiburg, Germany) for providing us the mice as well as for critical reading and help in manuscript preparation. We thank Katerina Zrinski-Petrovic for her excellent technical assistance. RANKL was a gift from Amgen.


    Disclosures
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
The authors have no financial conflict of interest.


    Footnotes
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 This work was supported by Welcome Trust (U.K.) Grant CRIGS 073828/Z/03/Z as well as by grants from the Croatian Ministry of Science, Education and Sports (108-1080229-0140, 108-1080229-0142, and 108-1080229-0341). Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Natasa Kovacic, Department of Anatomy, University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Salata 11, Zagreb, Croatia. E-mail address: natasa{at}mef.hr Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: FasL, Fas ligand; AP, alkaline phosphatase; rm, recombinant mouse; RANK, receptor activator of NF-{kappa}B; RANKL, RANK ligand; TRAP, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase; qPCR, quantitative PCR; PI, propidium iodide; NT, nick translation; OC, osteocalcin; DAPI, 4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole; Runx2, runt-related transcription factor 2; BSP, bone sialoprotein; Ct, cycle threshold; OPG, osteoprotegerin; {Delta}Rn, normalized fluorecence reporter signal. Back

Received for publication July 7, 2006. Accepted for publication December 7, 2006.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 

  1. Grcevic, D., V. Katavic, I. K. Lukic, N. Kovacic, J. A. Lorenzo, A. Marusic. 2001. Cellular and molecular interactions between immune system and bone. Croat. Med. J. 42: 384-392. [Medline]
  2. Weinstein, R. S., S. C. Manolagas. 2000. Apoptosis and osteoporosis. Am. J. Med. 108: 153-164. [Medline]
  3. Sartorius, U., I. Schmitz, P. H. Krammer. 2001. Molecular mechanisms of death-receptor-mediated apoptosis. Chembiochemistry 2: 20-29.
  4. Takahashi, T., M. Tanaka, C. I. Brannan, N. A. Jenkins, N. G. Copeland, T. Suda, S. Nagata. 1994. Generalized lymphoproliferative disease in mice, caused by a point mutation in the Fas ligand. Cell 76: 969-976. [Medline]
  5. Watanabe-Fukunaga, R., C. I. Brannan, N. G. Copeland, N. A. Jenkins, S. Nagata. 1992. Lymphoproliferation disorder in mice explained by defects in Fas antigen that mediates apoptosis. Nature 356: 314-317. [Medline]
  6. Adachi, M., S. Suematsu, T. Kondo, J. Ogasawara, T. Tanaka, N. Yoshida, S. Nagata. 1995. Targeted mutation in the Fas gene causes hyperplasia in peripheral lymphoid organs and liver. Nat. Genet. 11: 294-300. [Medline]
  7. Karray, S., C. Kress, S. Cuvellier, C. Hue-Beauvais, D. Damotte, C. Babinet, M. Levi-Strauss. 2004. Complete loss of Fas ligand gene causes massive lymphoproliferation and early death, indicating a residual activity of gld allele. J. Immunol. 172: 2118-2125. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Katavic, V., I. K. Lukic, N. Kovacic, D. Grcevic, J. A. Lorenzo, A. Marusic. 2003. Increased bone mass is a part of the generalized lymphoproliferative disorder phenotype in the mouse. J. Immunol. 170: 1540-1547. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Katavic, V., D. Grcevic, I. K. Lukic, V. Vucenik, N. Kovacic, I. Kalajzic, A. Marusic. 2003. Non-functional Fas ligand increases the formation of cartilage early in the endochondral bone induction by rhBMP-2. Life Sci. 74: 13-28. [Medline]
  10. Mori, S., M. Nose, M. Chiba, K. Narita, M. Kumagai, H. Kosaka, T. Teshima. 1997. Enhancement of ectopic bone formation in mice with a deficit in Fas-mediated apoptosis. Pathol. Int. 47: 112-116. [Medline]
  11. Bu, R., C. W. Borysenko, Y. Li, L. Cao, A. Sabokbar, H. C. Blair. 2003. Expression and function of TNF-family proteins and receptors in human osteoblasts. Bone 33: 760-770. [Medline]
  12. Hatakeyama, S., N. Tomichi, Y. Ohara-Nemoto, M. Satoh. 2000. The immunohistochemical localization of Fas and Fas ligand in jaw bone and tooth germ of human fetuses. Calcif. Tissue Int. 66: 330-337. [Medline]
  13. Ozeki, N., M. Mogi, H. Nakamura, A. Togari. 2002. Differential expression of the Fas-Fas ligand system on cytokine-induced apoptotic cell death in mouse osteoblastic cells. Arch. Oral Biol. 47: 511-517. [Medline]
  14. Wu, X., M. A. McKenna, X. Feng, T. R. Nagy, J. M. McDonald. 2003. Osteoclast apoptosis: the role of Fas in vivo and in vitro. Endocrinology 144: 5545-5555. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Park, H., Y. K. Jung, O. J. Park, Y. J. Lee, J. Y. Choi, Y. Choi. 2005. Interaction of Fas ligand and Fas expressed on osteoclast precursors increases osteoclastogenesis. J. Immunol. 175: 7193-7201. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Ogawa, Y., M. Ohtsuki, M. Uzuki, T. Sawai, Y. Onozawa, J. Nakayama, A. Yonemura, T. Kimura, H. Matsuno. 2003. Suppression of osteoclastogenesis in rheumatoid arthritis by induction of apoptosis in activated CD4+ T cells. Arthritis Rheum. 48: 3350-3358. [Medline]
  17. Kalajzic, I., Z. Kalajzic, M. Kaliterna, G. Gronowicz, S. H. Clark, A. C. Lichtler, D. Rowe. 2002. Use of type I collagen green fluorescent protein transgenes to identify subpopulations of cells at different stages of the osteoblast lineage. J. Bone Miner. Res. 17: 15-25. [Medline]
  18. Grcevic, D., S. K. Lee, A. Marusic, J. A. Lorenzo. 2000. Depletion of CD4 and CD8 T lymphocytes in mice in vivo enhances 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3-stimulated osteoclast-like cell formation in vitro by a mechanism that is dependent on prostaglandin synthesis. J. Immunol. 165: 4231-4238. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Shipman, C. M., M. J. Rogers, J. F. Apperley, R. G. Russell, P. I. Croucher. 1997. Bisphosphonates induce apoptosis in human myeloma cell lines: a novel anti-tumour activity. Br. J. Haematol. 98: 665-672. [Medline]
  20. Godard, T., E. Deslandes, P. Lebailly, C. Vigreux, F. Sichel, J. M. Poul, P. Gauduchon. 1999. Early detection of staurosporine-induced apoptosis by comet and annexin V assays. Histochem. Cell Biol. 112: 155-161. [Medline]
  21. Siegel, R. M., F. K. Chan, H. J. Chun, M. J. Lenardo. 2000. The multifaceted role of Fas signaling in immune cell homeostasis and autoimmunity. Nat. Immunol. 1: 469-474. [Medline]
  22. Schroeder, T. M., E. D. Jensen, J. J. Westendorf. 2005. Runx2: a master organizer of gene transcription in developing and maturing osteoblasts. Birth Defects Res. C. Embryo Today 75: 213-225. [Medline]
  23. Komori, T., H. Yagi, S. Nomura, A. Yamaguchi, K. Sasaki, K. Deguchi, Y. Shimizu, R. T. Bronson, Y. H. Gao, M. Inada, et al 1997. Targeted disruption of Cbfa1 results in a complete lack of bone formation owing to maturational arrest of osteoblasts. Cell 89: 755-764. [Medline]
  24. Aubin, J. E.. 1998. Advances in the osteoblast lineage. Biochem. Cell Biol. 76: 899-910. [Medline]
  25. Malaval, L., F. Liu, P. Roche, J. E. Aubin. 1999. Kinetics of osteoprogenitor proliferation and osteoblast differentiation in vitro. J. Cell. Biochem. 74: 616-627. [Medline]
  26. Ducy, P., G. Karsenty. 1995. Two distinct osteoblast-specific cis-acting elements control expression of a mouse osteocalcin gene. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15: 1858-1869. [Abstract]
  27. Lacey, D. L., E. Timms, H. L. Tan, M. J. Kelley, C. R. Dunstan, T. Burgess, R. Elliott, A. Colombero, G. Elliott, S. Scully, et al 1998. Osteoprotegerin ligand is a cytokine that regulates osteoclast differentiation and activation. Cell 93: 165-176. [Medline]
  28. De Maria, R., U. Testa, L. Luchetti, A. Zeuner, G. Stassi, E. Pelosi, R. Riccioni, N. Felli, P. Samoggia, C. Peschle. 1999. Apoptotic role of Fas/Fas ligand system in the regulation of erythropoiesis. Blood 93: 796-803.
  29. Alenzi, F. Q., S. B. Marley, J. L. Lewis, A. Chandrashekran, A. N. Warrens, J. M. Goldman, M. Y. Gordon. 2002. A role for the Fas/Fas ligand apoptotic pathway in regulating myeloid progenitor cell kinetics. Exp. Hematol. 30: 1428-1435. [Medline]
  30. Kalajzic, I., A. Staal, W. P. Yang, Y. Wu, S. E. Johnson, J. H. Feyen, W. Krueger, P. Maye, F. Yu, Y. Zhao, et al 2005. Expression profile of osteoblast lineage at defined stages of differentiation. J. Biol. Chem. 280: 24618-24626. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Imamura, R., K. Konaka, N. Matsumoto, M. Hasegawa, M. Fukui, N. Mukaida, T. Kinoshita, T. Suda. 2004. Fas ligand induces cell-autonomous NF-{kappa}B activation and interleukin-8 production by a mechanism distinct from that of tumor necrosis factor-{alpha}. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 46415-46423. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Kang, T. B., T. Ben-Moshe, E. E. Varfolomeev, Y. Pewzner-Jung, N. Yogev, A. Jurewicz, A. Waisman, O. Brenner, R. Haffner, E. Gustafsson, et al 2004. Caspase-8 serves both apoptotic and nonapoptotic roles. J. Immunol. 173: 2976-2984. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Mariani, S. M., B. Matiba, E. A. Armandola, P. H. Krammer. 1994. The APO-1/Fas (CD95) receptor is expressed in homozygous MRL/lpr mice. Eur. J. Immunol. 24: 3119-3123. [Medline]
  34. Bossen, C., K. Ingold, A. Tardivel, J. L. Bodmer, O. Gaide, S. Hertig, C. Ambrose, J. Tschopp, P. Schneider. 2006. Interactions of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and TNF receptor family members in the mouse and human. J. Biol. Chem. 281: 13964-13971. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Balkow, S., A. Kersten, T. T. Tran, T. Stehle, P. Grosse, C. Museteanu, O. Utermohlen, H. Pircher, F. von Weizsacker, R. Wallich, et al 2001. Concerted action of the FasL/Fas and perforin/granzyme A and B pathways is mandatory for the development of early viral hepatitis but not for recovery from viral infection. J. Virol. 75: 8781-8791. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Wu, X., G. Pan, M. A. McKenna, M. Zayzafoon, W. C. Xiong, J. M. McDonald. 2005. RANKL regulates Fas expression and Fas-mediated apoptosis in osteoclasts. J. Bone Miner. Res. 20: 107-116. [Medline]
  37. Lee, S. K., A. E. Gardner, J. F. Kalinowski, S. L. Jastrzebski, J. A. Lorenzo. 2006. RANKL-stimulated osteoclast-like cell formation in vitro is partially dependent on endogenous interleukin-1 production. Bone 38: 678-685. [Medline]
  38. Yin, T., L. Li. 2006. The stem cell niches in bone. J. Clin. Invest. 116: 1195-1201. [Medline]
  39. de Vries, E. G., T. Timmer, N. H. Mulder, C. M. van Geelen, W. T. van der Graaf, D. C. Spierings, M. N. de Hooge, J. A. Gietema, S. de Jong. 2003. Modulation of death receptor pathways in oncology. Drugs. Today 39: (Suppl. C):95-109. [Medline]
  40. Askenasy, N., E. S. Yolcu, I. Yaniv, H. Shirwan. 2005. Induction of tolerance using Fas ligand: a double-edged immunomodulator. Blood 105: 1396-1404. [Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kovacic, N.
Right arrow Articles by Marusic, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kovacic, N.
Right arrow Articles by Marusic, A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS