The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yarilina, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ivashkiv, L. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yarilina, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ivashkiv, L. B.
The Journal of Immunology, 2007, 178: 2204-2211.
Copyright © 2007 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Suppression of the Effector Phase of Inflammatory Arthritis by Double-Stranded RNA Is Mediated by Type I IFNs1

Anna Yarilina*, Edward DiCarlo{dagger} and Lionel B. Ivashkiv2,*,{ddagger}

* Arthritis and Tissue Degeneration Program and {dagger} Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY 10021; and {ddagger} Graduate Program in Immunology, Weill Graduate School of Medical Sciences of Cornell University, New York, NY 10021


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
Innate immune receptors that recognize nucleic acids, such as TLRs and RNA helicases, are potent activators of innate immunity that have been implicated in the induction and exacerbation of autoimmunity and inflammatory arthritis. Polyriboinosine-polyribocytidylic acid sodium salt (poly(IC)) is a mimic of dsRNA and viral infection that activates TLR3 and the RNA helicases retinoic acid-induced gene-1 and melanoma differentiation-associated gene-5, and strongly induces type I IFN production. We analyzed the effects of systemic delivery of poly(IC) on the inflammatory effector phase of arthritis using the collagen Ab-induced and KRN TCR-transgenic mouse serum-induced models of immune complex-mediated experimental arthritis. Surprisingly, poly(IC) suppressed arthritis, and suppression was dependent on type I IFNs that inhibited synovial cell proliferation and inflammatory cytokine production. Administration of exogenous type I IFNs was sufficient to suppress arthritis. These results suggest a regulatory role for innate immune receptors for dsRNA in modulating inflammatory arthritis and provide additional support for an anti-inflammatory function of type I IFNs in arthritis that directly contrasts with a pathogenic role in promoting autoimmunity in systemic lupus.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
The TLRs are a major class of innate immune receptors that recognize conserved molecular patterns expressed by microbes (pathogen-associated molecular patterns). TLRs play an important role in early host defense against various pathogens and also regulate the transition from innate to acquired immunity (1, 2, 3). In addition to microbial products, TLRs can be stimulated by endogenous ligands produced during inflammation or released secondary to tissue damage, such as heat shock proteins 60 and 70, high mobility group box chromosomal protein 1, and degradation products of fibrinogen (4, 5). TLRs are among the strongest known inducers of inflammatory cytokine production and have been implicated in the exacerbation of autoimmune diseases by coincident infections, likely via increased production of cytokines. TLR stimulation induces or exacerbates autoimmunity in many experimental models (2, 5, 6, 7). For example, LPS can aggravate subclinical arthritis or reactivate quiescent arthritis in several different animal models, likely by increasing IL-1 and TNF-{alpha} production (7, 8, 9). Thus, there is increasing interest in TLRs and their ligands as pathogenic factors in inflammatory diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA)3 (8).

However, TLRs also engage potent feedback inhibitory and homeostatic mechanisms. Most TLRs induce production of IL-10 that limits the extent of inflammation and associated tissue damage (10) and can modulate immune responses against pathogens. For example, TLR2 induces high levels of IL-10 production that suppress immune responses against bacterial infections (11, 12). TLRs that recognize LPS (TLR4) or nucleic acids (TLR3, TLR7, TLR8, and TLR9) are strong inducers of the pleiotropic type I IFNs. In contrast to other TLRs, TLR3, the receptor for dsRNA, does not engage the MyD88-dependent signaling pathway and is a relatively weak inducer of inflammatory cytokines such as TNF and IL-1. Instead, TLR3 mediates innate responses against dsRNA viruses by inducing production of large amounts of type I IFNs. Type I IFNs are also strongly induced when retinoic acid-induced gene-1 (RIG-1) and melanoma differentiation-associated gene-5 (Mda5)-signaling pathways are triggered by dsRNA (3).

Type I IFNs (IFN-{alpha} and -beta) are pleiotropic cytokines that can be produced by many cell types in response to viral, bacterial, and inflammatory stimuli and IFN itself (13). Type I IFNs have multiple, sometimes opposite, effects depending on their dose, local or systemic administration, cell type, and state of differentiation. Besides their originally described potent antiviral effects, type I IFNs regulate cell growth and differentiation and modulate immune and inflammatory responses (14, 15). Type I IFNs promote immunity via stimulation of chemokine and cytokine production, enhancement of dendritic cell maturation and function, up-regulation of MHC class I and II expression, induction of NK and T cell cytotoxicity, and promotion of Th1 responses, B cell class switching, and Ab production (15). Alternatively, type I IFNs also can suppress immunity and inflammation. For example, type I IFNs can decrease delayed type hypersensitivity, suppress proliferative responses of T cells to mitogens, and suppress endotoxin-induced mortality under certain conditions (16). Human diseases that have been reported to benefit from type I IFN treatment include multiple sclerosis, Sjögren’s syndrome, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, inflammatory bowl disease, Behçet’s disease, chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis, and some tumors (15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21). The mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of type I IFNs are not well understood and include suppression of cell proliferation and growth arrest; inhibition of IL-12, IL-1, and TNF-{alpha} production and activity; and, under specific conditions, suppression of IFN-{gamma} production (15, 16, 22).

TLRs, including TLR2, TL3, TLR4, are expressed in joint synovium, and there is an emerging interest in understanding the role of TLRs in the pathogenesis of inflammatory arthritis. Local synovial injection of TLR2, TLR3, TLR4, and TLR9 ligands has been clearly shown to induce or exacerbate arthritis (5, 8, 23, 24). In our study, we investigated the effects of systemic administration of dsRNA on experimental arthritis. We took advantage of two models of experimental arthritis that bypass the need to induce an autoimmune response by administering autoantibodies that directly induce immune complexes in joints and thereby induce synovial inflammation. This allowed us to test the effects of dsRNA solely on the inflammatory effector phase of arthritis. Surprisingly, dsRNA suppressed arthritis in a manner that was dependent on type I IFNs and suppression of synoviocyte proliferation and of inflammatory cytokine production. These results suggest that activation of TLRs or related signaling pathways downstream of RIG-I/Mda5 is not always detrimental for inflammatory disease pathogenesis, and they provide additional evidence supporting an anti-inflammatory role for type I IFNs in arthritis.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
Reagents

Polyriboinosine-polyribocytidylic acid sodium salt (poly(IC)) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Arthrogen-CIA arthritis-inducing mAb mixture and Escherichia coli LPS was from Chemicon International (Temecula, CA), and IFN-{alpha} A/D, a universal mammalian type I IFN, was from R&D Systems, rabbit monoclonal anti-Ki67 Ab was from NeoMarkers (Lab Vision), Vectastain ABC kit, Vector NovaRED substrate, and Ag Unmasking Solution were from Vector Laboratories, control rabbit IgG was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, and Contrast GREEN Solution was from Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories.

Mice and induction of experimental arthritis

Wild-type C57BL/6J and NOD/Lt mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory. IFNAR1-deficient mice (a gift from Dr. D. Levy, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY) and genetically matched control mice were maintained on a C57BL/6J x 129/Sv genetic background. KRN TCR-transgenic mice (a gift from Drs. D. Mathis and C. Benoist, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA) were bred to NOD/Lt mice to generate K/BxN mice. All animals were bred and maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions in the Animal Facility of the Hospital for Special Surgery (New York, NY), and all protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Collagen Ab-induced arthritis (CAIA) was induced in 6- to 8-wk-old male mice by i.p. administration of 4 mg of Arthrogen-CIA arthritis-inducing mAb mixture at day 0 followed by injection of 50 µg of LPS on day 2 (25). Control animals were injected with saline at day 0 and 50 µg of LPS on day 2. K/BxN serum pools were prepared from adult arthritic mice as previously described (26). Arthritis was induced by i.p. injection of 150 µl of serum at days –2 and 0. Control animals were injected with saline only. The severity of arthritis was monitored by measuring the thickness of both wrist and ankle joints using a dial type caliper (Bel-Art Products). For each animal, the joint thickness was calculated as a sum of measurements of two wrists and two ankles. The joint thickness was represented as an average for every group of treatment.

Cell culture

Murine bone marrow-derived macrophages from C57BL/6 mice were obtained by culturing bone marrow in DMEM supplemented with 20% FBS (HyClone) containing 10 ng/ml murine M-CSF (Peprotech) as described (27). Macrophages at 2 x 106 cells/well (six-well plate) were stimulated with 25 µg/ml poly(IC) for 24 h and then with 10 ng/ml LPS for another 24 h.

Histopathology

For histopathology, knee joints were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 24 h, decalcified with 10% neutral buffered EDTA for 6 days, and embedded in paraffin. Sections 5 µm thick were stained with either H&E or safranin O using standard techniques. Synovial membranes, bones, and cartilage tissues of knee joints were evaluated blindly using a previously validated scoring system (28) by a certified pathologist who specializes in musculoskeletal diseases and independently by a second blinded investigator. The synovial tissues were scored for the degree of inflammatory cell infiltration, pannus formation, proliferation of synovial cells, and presence of debris in the joint space. The bone and cartilage tissues were scored for the presence of degeneration and death of chondrocytes, proteoglycan depletion, destruction of bone, increase in osteoclasts, and inflammation in the bone and periosteum. Each parameter was examined separately and the severity was graded as follows: –, normal; +, slight change; ++, mild change; and +++, severe change.

Measurement of synovial lining thickness was performed using digital image analysis with Bioquant Nova version 5.50.8 software (R&M Biometrics) as described previously (29). Briefly, three regions of synovium that were comparable between control and experimental mice were assessed in each slide and a total of four to six slides were analyzed for each treatment group. Lines from the outer surface to the inner margin of the synovial lining that were perpendicular to the inner margin were drawn at 20- to 30-µm intervals, the lining layer depth was measured, and the mean result was expressed in micrometers.

Immunohistochemistry

Sections were prepared as described for histopathology. Before incubation with Abs samples were microwaved for 5 min in Ag Unmasking Solution and then left to cool to room temperature; endogenous peroxidase was blocked by the glucose oxidase-glucose-sodium azide method (30). To detect cell proliferation, sections were stained with rabbit monoclonal anti-Ki67, followed by incubation with biotinylated secondary Abs, and then visualized using the Vectastain ABC kit and Vector NovaRED substrate (stains nuclei red) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. All sections were counterstained with Contrast GREEN Solution which stains nuclei bluish green. Nonproliferating cells stained light bluish green (Contrast GREEN positive only), whereas proliferating cells stained dark blue/purple (Contrast GREEN and NovaRED positive). For each section, the total number of cells and the number of proliferating cells in three different matched regions of the joint were quantitated using digital image analysis with Bioquant Nova version 5.50.8 software.

Analysis of mRNA levels

RNA was isolated from one knee joint, wrists, ankles, and small paw joints of each animal separately. Briefly, legs were cut close to the joints and cleaned from the skin and muscles, bone marrow was washed out, and joints were opened into guanidine isothiocyanate-containing buffer, vortexed for 1 min, and then frozen at –20°C until used. For quantitative real time PCR, DNA-free RNA was extracted using a RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) with DNase treatment, and 0.5 µg of total RNA was reverse transcribed using a First Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (Fermentas). Real time PCR was performed in triplicate using the iCycler iQ thermal cycler and detection system and an iQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad). Relative expression was normalized for levels of GAPDH. The primer sequences used were: GAPDH, forward primer (5'-ATCAAGAAGGTGGTGAAGCA-3') and reverse primer (5'-AGACAACCTGGTCCTCAGTGT-3'); RANTES, forward primer (5'-TTTGAAACCAGCAGCCTTTG-3') and reverse primer (5'-GCATTCAGTTCCAGGTCAGT-3'); vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGFbeta), forward primer (5'-TGGATGTGTCTACCAGCGAAGC-3') and reverse primer (5'-TGTCCACCAGGGTCTCAATC-3'); COX-2, forward primer (5'-TGCTGCCCGACACCTTTCAACAT-3'); and reverse primer (5'-AGCAACCCGGCCAGCAATCT-3'); IL-1beta, forward primer (5'-ACATCAGCACCTCACAAGCA-3') and reverse primer (5'-TTAGAAACAGTCCAGCCCATA-3'); MCP-1, forward primer (5'-TGTCCCAAAGAAGCTGTAGT-3') and reverse primer (5'-TGTATGGTCTGGATTCC-3'); IL-6, forward primer (5'-AGCTGGAGTCACAGAAGGAG-3') and reverse primer (5'-AGGCATAACGCACT AGGTTT-3').

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was done using SPSS Analytical Software version 8.0.2 for Windows (SPSS). The Mann-Whitney U test was performed to determine whether statistically significant differences existed among the groups.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
Poly(IC) suppresses the effector phase of inflammatory arthritis

We tested whether poly(IC), a mimic of dsRNA and an activating ligand for TLR3, RIG-I, and Mda5, could suppress the inflammatory effector phase of arthritis using the CAIA model. In this well-established model (9, 25), mice are injected with a single dose of a mAb mixture directed against collagen type II, followed by an LPS injection 2 days later. Arthritis develops rapidly (3–4 days after mAb injection) and reaches a maximum at days 6–7 (25). In our study, we sacrificed mice near the peak of arthritis (day 6) to obtain joints for analysis of histology and gene expression. Control mice that were injected with LPS alone did not develop arthritis, as assessed by measuring joint thickness (Fig. 1A) and histological analysis (Fig. 1B). As expected, arthritis developed rapidly in mice injected with anti-collagen Abs and LPS (Fig. 1A). Systemic administration of poly(IC), given i.p., blocked development of arthritis (Fig. 1A). Histological analysis revealed that poly(IC) suppressed synovial hyperplasia, with decreased numbers of synovial lining cell layers and decreased synovial thickness. Representative knee joint sections are shown in Fig. 1B, and a more thorough and quantitative analysis of the histology is presented below. These results suggested that poly(IC) suppresses the inflammatory effector phase of arthritis in the CAIA model.


Figure 1
View larger version (77K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 1. The TLR3 ligand poly(IC) suppresses arthritis elicited by synovial autoantibodies and immune complexes. A, Poly(IC) suppresses anti-CAIA. Arthritis was induced in C57BL/6 mice using anti-collagen Abs and LPS as described in Materials and Methods. Poly(IC) (150 µg) or PBS (150 µl) were injected i.p. every other day beginning 1 day before Ab injection. Control nonarthritic mice received only LPS. Data are shown as mean ± SD, of four (poly(IC)) and six (arthritis and control) mice in each treatment group and represent two independent experiments. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01 for differences between arthritic mice treated with poly(IC) vs PBS. B, Representative histology of knee joints. Animals were sacrificed on day 6 after injection of anti-collagen Abs, hind legs were fixed and decalcified, and knee joint sections were stained with H & E and safranin O. Original magnification, x40. Arrows show synovium and asterisks mark pannus. Inserts show higher magnification (x400) of synovium. C, Poly(IC) suppresses K/BxN serum-induced arthritis. C57BL/6 mice received i.p injections of K/BxN serum on days –2 and 0. Poly(IC) was administered as described above, starting 1 day before serum injection. Animals from the control group were injected i.p. with PBS. Data are means ± SD of six mice in each treatment group and represent two independent experiments. Significant differences between arthritic mice treated with poly(IC) and PBS are indicated as follows: *, p < 0.05.

 
In the CAIA model, poly(IC) could potentially suppress either inflammation elicited by synovial anti-collagen Abs, or the effects of LPS (which works in this model by transiently inducing elevated levels of IL-1 and TNF-{alpha} (31)). To address whether poly(IC) suppressed inflammation induced by synovial autoantibodies/immune complexes, we used the K/BxN serum transfer model that does not require injection of LPS or any other exogenous adjuvants (32, 33). In this model, arthritis is induced by transfer of arthritogenic serum derived from arthritic K/BxN mice that express high titers of Abs directed against GPI that is expressed in cartilage and synovium. Treatment with poly(IC) substantially and significantly inhibited arthritis in the K/BxN serum transfer model (Fig. 1C). These results indicate that poly(IC) can suppress the autoantibody/immune complex-dependent component of inflammatory arthritis.

Suppression of arthritis by poly(IC) is mediated by type I IFNs

Poly(IC) could suppress arthritis indirectly secondary to induction of type I IFN production. Alternatively, direct ligation of synovial TLR3 and/or RIG-I/Mda5 and activation of downstream pathways and genes other than type I IFNs could contribute to suppression. To differentiate between these two possibilities, we used mice deficient in the IFNAR1 subunit of the type I IFN receptor which were on a mixed 129/Sv x C57BL/6 genetic background (34). Poly(IC) suppressed CAIA in control genetically matched mice on the 129 x C57BL/6 background (Fig. 2, top), albeit to a lesser extent than in C57BL/6 mice (Fig. 1A). In contrast to control mice, poly(IC) did not suppress arthritis in the absence of IFNAR1 and type I IFN signaling (Fig. 2, bottom panel). Instead, arthritis was more severe in IFNAR1 knockout animals (Fig. 2, bottom). This result indicates that suppression of arthritis by poly(IC) was dependent on the induction of endogenous type I IFNs and further supports a role for type I IFNs in the suppression of arthritis. One possible explanation for induction of more severe arthritis by poly(IC) in IFNAR1-deficient mice is that type I IFNs function in a feedback inhibition loop to limit poly(IC)-induced inflammatory cytokine production.


Figure 2
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 2. Suppression of arthritis by poly(IC) is mediated by type I IFNs. Poly(IC) does not reduce arthritis in IFNAR1 knockout mice. Control mice on a mixed C57BL/6 x 129/Sv background (top) and matched IFNAR1-deficient mice on the same genetic background (bottom) were used, and arthritis was induced using anti-collagen Abs and LPS. Data are means ± SD, of three mice in each treatment group. Significant differences are indicated as follows: *, p < 0.05.

 
To further confirm the inhibitory role of type I IFN in arthritis, we injected mice with recombinant IFN-{alpha} A/D, following the same regimen as with poly(IC). Similar to poly(IC), type I IFN reduced joint swelling by suppressing hyperplasia of the synovial lining layer and pannus formation (Fig. 3A and B (inset) and Table I). These results indicate that type I IFNs are sufficient to suppress inflammatory arthritis.


Figure 3
View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 3. IFN{alpha} attenuates joint swelling. A, Time course of arthritis development with or without IFN{alpha} treatment. Arthritis was induced in C57BL/6 mice using anti-collagen Abs and LPS. IFN-{alpha} at a loading dose of 5 x 104 U was given s.c. 1 day before Ab injection, followed by injection of 104 U every other day. Control nonarthritic mice received only LPS. Data are means ± SD of six (arthritis and control) and four (IFN-{alpha} + arthritis) mice in each treatment group and represent two independent experiments. Significant differences between arthritic mice treated with IFN{alpha} and PBS are marked as follows: *, p < 0.05. B, Representative histology of knee joints. Animals were sacrificed on day 6 after Ab injection. Original magnification, x40. Arrows, synovium; asterisks, pannus. Smaller insets show higher magnification (x400) of synovium.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table I. Histopathological analysis of knee jointsa

 
It was recently reported that uric acid administered i.p. suppressed arthritis by skewing inflammation from the joint cavity to the site of injection (35). We investigated the possibility that i.p. administration of poly(IC) or IFN-{alpha} could attenuate arthritis by inducing inflammatory exudates in the peritoneum, thereby diverting inflammation from the joint to the peritoneum. Mice were injected with poly(IC) or with same volume of PBS i.p. every other day, following the same protocol that was used in the arthritis induction experiments. Peritoneal cells were harvested 2 and 4 days after initiation of injections, time points that correspond to the time of initiation of arthritis and the early stage of arthritis where poly(IC) was suppressive (Fig. 1). Poly(IC) did not increase peritoneal cell numbers relative to PBS-treated controls (Fig. 4). We have previously reported that i.p. administration of IFN-{alpha} did not induce inflammatory exudates in C57BL/6 mice (36). These results suggested that factors other than skewing of inflammation to another compartment contributed to the suppressive effects of poly(IC) and IFN-{alpha} on arthritis.


Figure 4
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 4. Local effects of poly(IC) at the site of injection. Poly(IC) does not induce peritoneal inflammation. C57BL/6 mice were injected with 150 µg of poly(IC) in 500 µl of PBS or with PBS alone. Mice were sacrificed on days 2 and 4 after the first injection. Peritoneal cells were washed out with saline and counted. Data are the results of two independent experiments (total of eight animals per group of treatment for each day).

 
Poly(IC) and IFN-{alpha} suppress synovial proliferation and pannus formation

Next, we examined the effect of poly(IC) on synovial histology. Slides were reviewed blindly by a pathologist who specializes in the musculoskeletal system and arthritis, and a semiquantitative evaluation of histopathology was performed by two independent blinded observers (Table I). Poly(IC) suppressed synovial hyperplasia and pannus formation and also attenuated the extent of tissue damage (Table I). Poly(IC)- and IFN-{alpha}-mediated suppression of synovial hyperplasia was more precisely quantitated, and the difference relative to untreated arthritic joints was statistically significant (p < 0.01) for poly(IC) treatment (Fig. 5A). However, although the extent of synovial lining hyperplasia and the size of the inflammatory lesion (pannus) were smaller in poly(IC)- and IFN-{alpha}-treated mice, the intensity of inflammatory cell infiltrates was minimally affected by IFN-{alpha} and poly(IC) (Figs. 1B and 3B and Table I). Thus, IFN-{alpha} and poly(IC) attenuated arthritis by diminishing the amount of inflammatory tissue, but not changing the intensity of inflammatory infiltrates.


Figure 5
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 5. Poly(IC) and IFN-{alpha} suppress synovial proliferation and pannus formation. A, Synovial lining thickness. Knee joint sections were stained with H & E, and synovial thickness was measured as described in Materials and Methods using Bioquant Nova software. Data are means ± SEM of four (poly(IC), IFN-{alpha}) and six (arthritis and control) mice in each treatment group and represent two independent experiments. Differences relative to positive control arthritic mice were significant as shown: *, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001. B, Proliferation of synovial cells. C57BL/6 mice were injected with anti-collagen Ab and LPS and treated with IFN-{alpha} and poly(IC) as before and sacrificed on day 6; synovial tissue sections from hind paws were stained with anti-Ki67 Ab and counterstained with Contrast GREEN. Nonproliferating cells stain light bluish green, whereas proliferating cells stain dark blue/purple. C, Synovial tissue sections from B were analyzed using Bioquant Nova software and the per cent of synovial cells positive for nuclear Ki67 is shown. Significant differences relative to positive control arthritic mice are marked: *, p < 0.05.

 
The combination of comparable intensity of inflammatory infiltrates with less synovial hyperplasia and pannus formation suggested that IFN-{alpha} and poly(IC) may suppress arthritis, at least in part, by suppressing synoviocyte proliferative responses to inflammation. This possibility was further investigated using immunohistochemistry with a mAb against Ki67 to detect proliferating cells (Fig. 5, B and C). There was a substantial increase in cells that stained positive for Ki67 (cells that stain dark blue/purple in Fig. 5B), indicating increased synovial cell proliferation in arthritic relative to control joints, (Fig. 5B, quantitated in Fig. 5C). Both IFN-{alpha} and poly(IC) suppressed synovial cell proliferation (Fig. 5, B and C), and this difference was statistically significant (Fig. 5C). In addition, the number of newly formed blood vessels (positive for CD31) was diminished in IFN-{alpha}- and poly(IC)-treated animals, but this trend did not reach statistical significance (data not shown). Finally, we measured the effects of IFN-{alpha} and poly(IC) on synovial inflammatory mediators. The CAIA model is highly dependent on IL-1 (28, 31), and both IFN-{alpha} and poly(IC) suppressed synovial expression of IL-1 mRNA (Fig. 6A). In addition, IFN-{alpha} and poly(IC) suppressed synovial levels of cyclooxygenase-2 and VEGF (Fig. 6A). In contrast, synovial expression of RANTES and MCP-1 was not decreased by IFN{alpha} and poly(IC) (Fig. 6A). Synovial IL-10 expression was not affected by poly(IC) (data not shown), suggesting that systemic poly(IC) administration is insufficient to induce synovial IL-10 production. LPS contributes to inflammatory cytokine production in the CAIA model. We tested whether poly(IC) can suppress the inflammatory response to LPS. Macrophages preincubated with poly(IC) for 24 h showed substantially reduced expression of IL-6, IL-1, and TNF-{alpha} after stimulation with LPS (Fig. 6B), a suppressive effect that is most likely mediated by type I IFN (22). Taken together, the results suggest that IFN-{alpha} and poly(IC) inhibit arthritis by suppressing synovial production of inflammatory mediators and synoviocyte proliferative responses.


Figure 6
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 6. Effect of poly(IC) and IFN{alpha} treatment on gene expression in synovial and infiltrating inflammatory cells. A, Gene expression in mouse synovium. RNA was isolated from pooled wrist, ankle, and knee synovia on day 6 after induction of CAIA, and mRNA levels were determined by quantitative real time PCR and normalized relative to GAPDH expression. Expression relative to untreated nonarthritic animals (set at 1) is shown. Data are means ± SD of four to six animals per group of treatment. Significant differences relative to control nonarthritic mice injected with LPS only are marked: *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; and significant differences relative to arthritic untreated mice are marked: +, p < 0.05. B, Poly(IC) pretreatment diminishes LPS-induced inflammatory gene expression in mouse bone marrow-derived macrophages. Bone marrow-derived macrophages from C57BL/6 mice were incubated with or without 25 µg/ml poly(IC) for 24 h before stimulation with 10 ng/ml LPS for another 24 h. RNA levels were measured using quantitative real time PCR. Data are the mean expression relative to unstimulated macrophages (set at 1) ± SD in six independent experiments. Significant differences are marked: *, p < 0.01.

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
Disclosures
 References
 
A role for TLRs in the induction and perpetuation of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases has been established (2, 5, 37). The major finding of our study is that, in contrast to other TLRs, activation of TLR3 suppresses the inflammatory effector phase of arthritis. TLR3 is a relatively weak inducer of inflammatory cytokines such as TNF and IL-1 and a strong inducer of type I IFN production. Our study suggests that this pattern of TLR3-induced cytokine production can attenuate inflammatory processes and implicate TLR3 as a potential negative regulator of inflammatory diseases via production of type I IFNs. This concept is in line with recent reports showing that TLR9 suppresses intestinal inflammation via production of IFNs (20), and that TLR9 suppresses inflammation in the MRL/lpr model of systemic lupus erythematosus by an as yet unknown mechanism (38). Taken together, our results and these previous reports suggest a regulatory function for certain TLRs in inflammatory processes.

TLR3 is expressed on the plasma membrane and in endosomes and recognizes extracellular and endocytosed dsRNA. Thus, TLR3 likely mediates the systemic effects of poly(IC) after injection of mice. In contrast, the RNA helicases RIG-I and Mda5 recognize cytoplasmic dsRNA, and transfection of cells with poly(IC) is required to activate these receptors (3). However, a recent publication suggests a role for Mda5 in mediating effects of poly(IC) in vivo (39), and future work will determine the relative importance of TLR3, RIG-I, and Mda5 in mediating the suppressive effects of dsRNA on inflammatory arthritis. TLR3, RIG-I, and Mda5 all participate in innate responses to viral infection and activate similar downstream signaling pathways, with sequential activation of TNFR-associated factor-associated NF-{kappa}B activator-binding kinase/I{kappa}B kinase-{epsilon} and IFN regulatory factor 3 resulting in production of large amounts of type I IFN.

Many factors have opposing effects on arthritis depending on whether they are expressed systemically or locally in the joint. For example, systemic TGF-beta administration suppresses arthritis by suppressing immune and inflammatory reactions (40), whereas the chemotactic properties of TGF-beta predominate after intra-articular injection, resulting in influx of inflammatory cells and induction of arthritis (41). Similarly, many TLR ligands, including TLR3 and TLR9 ligands, induce local cytokine and chemokine production and arthritis when injected intra-articularly (5, 23, 24). Articular ligation of these TLRs, such as occurs during joint infections, will contribute to synovial inflammation. Ligands of at least two TLRs, TLR3 (this study) and TLR9 (D. Mathis, unpublished observation), suppress arthritis when given systemically. Systemic ligation of these TLRs, which can occur during systemic infection, release of endogenous nucleic acids from apoptotic or necrotic cells, or therapeutic administration of TLR ligands, will suppress synovitis.

Type I IFNs can either exacerbate or attenuate autoimmune diseases. For example, type I IFNs have been implicated in the pathogenesis of the autoimmune disease systemic lupus erythematosus but have clear suppressive and therapeutic effects in multiple sclerosis and inflammatory bowel disease (17, 18, 19, 20, 21). Greater understanding of which components of these complex diseases are suppressed by IFNs and of the cellular and molecular basis of the beneficial effects of type I IFNs, would help guide future therapeutic approaches. This study shows that type I IFNs suppress the inflammatory effector component of arthritis by a mechanism that involves inhibition of synovial cell proliferation and of inflammatory cytokine production. Although type I IFNs suppressed arthritis in other experimental models, a significant clinical benefit was not detected in relatively short term trials of IFN in RA (42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48). We predict that prolonged IFN therapy that suppresses the expansion of pannus by inhibiting the growth of synoviocytes would potentially have a beneficial effect on inflammatory arthritis.

In contrast to suppressing inflammation, type I IFNs exacerbate autoimmunity (15, 16). We propose that the balance between the opposing effects of IFNs on inflammation and autoimmunity will determine the outcome of IFN treatment of specific diseases. In RA, this balance would be determined by the opposing effects of IFN on promoting autoimmunity mediated by lymphocytes and dendritic cells and suppressive effects on inflammation that is mediated by synovial macrophages and fibroblasts. Autoimmunity has been proposed to play a more important role in pathogenesis in early RA, with inflammatory synovitis becoming less dependent on autoimmunity later in the disease process (49). If this notion is correct, our results showing effective suppression of the inflammatory synovial component of arthritis by IFN-{alpha} suggests that IFN therapy may be more effective in late disease, especially if therapy is of sufficient duration to attenuate the expansion of pannus. On the other hand, IFNs would be least effective and could potentially even exacerbate disease, if given during a phase of arthritis where autoimmunity is a prominent driver of synovial inflammation.

Macrophages play an important role in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis and inflammatory bowel disease, and one mechanism by which IFNs suppress these diseases is inhibition of macrophage inflammatory cytokine production (19, 20, 21). Macrophages also play a key role in the pathogenesis of RA and of the effector inflammatory phase of experimental arthritis (50). Thus, it is likely that suppression of macrophage cytokine production contributes to the suppressive effects of IFNs that we observed. This notion is supported by our findings of lower expression of the macrophage-derived cytokine IL-1 in synovia of IFN- or poly(IC)-treated arthritic mice (Fig. 6A), and of a suppressive role of poly(IC) in proinflammatory cytokine production by macrophages in vitro (Fig. 6B). Emerging evidence suggests that type I IFNs also suppress inflammatory diseases by direct effects on target organs or tissues, for example by regulating epithelial homeostasis in the bowel (51). It is likely that type I IFNs suppressed synovitis at least in part by acting directly on cells in the target tissue, namely by suppressing synoviocyte proliferation (Fig. 5) via their well-known effects of suppressing progression through the cell cycle (13).

Synovial biopsies have demonstrated that RA patients can have substantial inflammatory infiltrates in synovium obtained from asymptomatic joints that have a normal physical examination (52, 53, 54). This work, together with evidence of autoimmunity against cyclic citrullinated peptide before onset of clinical disease (55, 56), demonstrate a preclinical phase of disease where joint swelling is not apparent, despite intense synovial inflammation. These previous findings suggest that even intense synovial inflammation may be clinically unapparent in the absence of a quantitative increase in the size of infiltrates (as occurs during pannus formation) or the development of vascular permeability that leads to joint effusions. We found that even when IFN and poly(IC) effectively suppressed joint swelling (Figs. 1 and 3 and Table I), inflammatory synovial infiltrates, deposits of fibrin in the joint cavity, and loss of proteoglycans were readily detectable. This pattern is similar to that of biopsied asymptomatic joints of RA patients and suggests that type I IFNs suppressed the progression of synovial inflammation into clinically apparent disease. Our results suggest that IFNs accomplished this suppression by inhibiting synoviocyte proliferation (Fig. 5) and thus pannus formation, by suppressing expression of regulators of increased vascular permeability such as cyclooxygenase-2 (via PGE2) and vascular endothelial growth factor (Fig. 6A), and possibly by suppressing neoangiogenesis (A. Yarilina, unpublished observations). Thus, type I IFNs can suppress progression of synovitis by several mechanisms that include suppression of proliferation and production of inflammatory factors, and possibly by modulation of factors that regulate synovial vasculature.


   Acknowledgments
 
We thank Kyung-Hyun Park-Min for critical review of the manuscript and Steve Doty and the Hospital for Special Surgery Analytical Microscopy Core for help with histology.


   Disclosures
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
References
 
The authors have no financial conflict of interest.


   Footnotes
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (to L.B.I.) and was conducted in a facility constructed with support from Research Facilities Improvement Program Grant C06-RR12538-01 from the National Center for Research Resources, National Institutes of Health. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Lionel B. Ivashkiv, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021. E-mail address: ivashkivl{at}hss.edu Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: RA, rheumatoid arthritis; poly(IC), polyriboinosine-polyribocytidylic acid sodium salt; RIG-I, retinoic acid-induced gene-1; Mda5, melanoma differentiation-associated gene-5; CAIA, collagen Ab-induced arthritis; K/BxN, KRN TCR-transgenic mouse; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor. Back

Received for publication July 28, 2006. Accepted for publication November 24, 2006.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 

  1. Kawai, T., S. Akira. 2006. TLR signaling. Cell Death Differ. 13: 816-825. [Medline]
  2. Iwasaki, A., R. Medzhitov. 2004. Toll-like receptor control of the adaptive immune responses. Nat. Immunol. 5: 987-995. [Medline]
  3. Kawai, T., S. Akira. 2006. Innate immune recognition of viral infection. Nat. Immunol. 7: 131-137. [Medline]
  4. Akira, S., K. Takeda. 2004. Toll-like receptor signalling. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 4: 499-511. [Medline]
  5. Anders, H. J., D. Zecher, R. D. Pawar, P. S. Patole. 2005. Molecular mechanisms of autoimmunity triggered by microbial infection. Arthritis Res. Ther. 7: 215-224. [Medline]
  6. Redecke, V., H. Hacker, S. K. Datta, A. Fermin, P. M. Pitha, D. H. Broide, E. Raz. 2004. Cutting edge: activation of Toll-like receptor 2 induces a Th2 immune response and promotes experimental asthma. J. Immunol. : 2739-2743.
  7. Choe, J. Y., B. Crain, S. R. Wu, M. Corr. 2003. Interleukin 1 receptor dependence of serum transferred arthritis can be circumvented by Toll-like receptor 4 signaling. J. Exp. Med. : 537-542.
  8. Brentano, F., D. Kyburz, O. Schorr, R. Gay, S. Gay. 2005. The role of Toll-like receptor signalling in the pathogenesis of arthritis. Cell Immunol. 233: 90-96. [Medline]
  9. Terato, K., D. S. Harper, M. M. Griffiths, D. L. Hasty, X. J. Ye, M. A. Cremer, J. M. Seyer. 1995. Collagen-induced arthritis in mice: synergistic effect of E. coli lipopolysaccharide bypasses epitope specificity in the induction of arthritis with monoclonal antibodies to type II collagen. Autoimmunity 22: 137-147. [Medline]
  10. Moore, K. W., R. de Waal Malefyt, R. L. Coffman, A. O’Garra. 2001. Interleukin-10 and the interleukin-10 receptor. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 19: 683-765. [Medline]
  11. Netea, M. G., R. Sutmuller, C. Hermann, C. A. Van der Graaf, J. W. Van der Meer, J. H. van Krieken, T. Hartung, G. Adema, B. J. Kullberg. 2004. Toll-like receptor 2 suppresses immunity against Candida albicans through induction of IL-10 and regulatory T cells. J. Immunol. 172: 3712-3718. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Sing, A., D. Rost, N. Tvardovskaia, A. Roggenkamp, A. Wiedemann, C. J. Kirschning, M. Aepfelbacher, J. Heesemann. 2002. Yersinia V-antigen exploits Toll-like receptor 2 and CD14 for interleukin 10-mediated immunosuppression. J. Exp. Med. 196: 1017-1024. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Bach, E. A., D. H. Kaplan, R. D. Schreiber. 1999. Bichemistry, Mechanism of Action, and Biology of the Interferons Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore.
  14. Biron, C. A.. 2001. Interferons {alpha} and beta as immune regulators: a new look. Immunity 14: 661-664. [Medline]
  15. Gutterman, J. U.. 1994. Cytokine therapeutics: lessons from interferon {alpha}. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 1198-1205. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Ivashkiv, L. B.. 2003. Type I interferon modulation of cellular responses to cytokines and infectious pathogens: potential role in SLE pathogenesis. Autoimmunity 36: 473-479. [Medline]
  17. Belardelli, F., I. Gresser. 1996. The neglected role of type I interferon in the T-cell response: implications for its clinical use. Immunol. Today 17: 369-372. [Medline]
  18. Brassard, D. L., M. J. Grace, R. W. Bordens. 2002. Interferon-{alpha} as an immunotherapeutic protein. J. Leukocyte Biol. 71: 565-581. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Teige, I., A. Treschow, A. Teige, R. Mattsson, V. Navikas, T. Leanderson, R. Holmdahl, S. Issazadeh-Navikas. 2003. IFN-beta gene deletion leads to augmented and chronic demyelinating experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Immunol. 170: 4776-4784. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Katakura, K., J. Lee, D. Rachmilewitz, G. Li, L. Eckmann, E. Raz. 2005. Toll-like receptor 9-induced type I IFN protects mice from experimental colitis. J. Clin. Invest. 115: 695-702. [Medline]
  21. Nikolaus, S., P. Rutgeerts, R. Fedorak, A. H. Steinhart, G. E. Wild, D. Theuer, J. Mohrle, S. Schreiber. 2003. Interferon beta1a in ulcerative colitis: a placebo controlled, randomised, dose escalating study. Gut 52: 1286-1290. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Sharif, M. N., D. Sosic, C. V. Rothlin, E. Kelly, G. Lemke, E. N. Olson, L. B. Ivashkiv. 2006. Twist mediates suppression of inflammation by type I IFNs and Axl. J. Exp. Med. 203: 1891-1901. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Zare, F., M. Bokarewa, N. Nenonen, T. Bergstrom, L. Alexopoulou, R. A. Flavell, A. Tarkowski. 2004. Arthritogenic properties of double-stranded (viral) RNA. J. Immunol. 172: 5656-5663. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Magnusson, M., F. Zare, A. Tarkowski. 2006. Requirement of type I interferon signaling for arthritis triggered by double-stranded RNA. Arthritis Rheum. 54: 148-157. [Medline]
  25. Terato, K., K. A. Hasty, R. A. Reife, M. A. Cremer, A. H. Kang, J. M. Stuart. 1992. Induction of arthritis with monoclonal antibodies to collagen. J. Immunol. 148: 2103-2108. [Abstract]
  26. Korganow, A. S., H. Ji, S. Mangialaio, V. Duchatelle, R. Pelanda, T. Martin, C. Degott, H. Kikutani, K. Rajewsky, J. L. Pasquali, C. Benoist, D. Mathis. 1999. From systemic T cell self-reactivity to organ-specific autoimmune disease via immunoglobulins. Immunity 10: 451-461. [Medline]
  27. Herrero, C., L. Marques, J. Lloberas, A. Celada. 2001. IFN-{gamma}-dependent transcription of MHC class II IA is impaired in macrophages from aged mice. J. Clin. Invest. 107: 485-493. [Medline]
  28. Kagari, T., D. Tanaka, H. Doi, T. Shimozato. 2003. Essential role of Fc{gamma} receptors in anti-type II collagen antibody-induced arthritis. J. Immunol. 170: 4318-4324. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Cunnane, G., L. Bjork, A. K. Ulfgren, S. Lindblad, O. FitzGerald, B. Bresnihan, U. Andersson. 1999. Quantitative analysis of synovial membrane inflammation: a comparison between automated and conventional microscopic measurements. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 58: 493-499. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Andrew, S. M., B. Jasani. 1987. An improved method for the inhibition of endogenous peroxidase non-deleterious to lymphocyte surface markers: application to immunoperoxidase studies on eosinophil-rich tissue preparations. Histochem. J. 19: 426-430. [Medline]
  31. Kagari, T., H. Doi, T. Shimozato. 2002. The importance of IL-1beta and TNF-{alpha}, and the noninvolvement of IL-6, in the development of monoclonal antibody-induced arthritis. J. Immunol. 169: 1459-1466. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Kyburz, D., M. Corr. 2003. The KRN mouse model of inflammatory arthritis. Springer Semin. Immunopathol. 25: 79-90. [Medline]
  33. Matsumoto, I., A. Staub, C. Benoist, D. Mathis. 1999. Arthritis provoked by linked T and B cell recognition of a glycolytic enzyme. Science 286: 1732-1735. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Muller, U., U. Steinhoff, L. F. Reis, S. Hemmi, J. Pavlovic, R. M. Zinkernagel, M. Aguet. 1994. Functional role of type I and type II interferons in antiviral defense. Science 264: 1918-1921. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Zare, F., M. Magnusson, T. Bergstrom, M. Brisslert, E. Josefsson, A. Karlsson, A. Tarkowski. 2006. Uric acid, a nucleic acid degradation product, down-regulates dsRNA-triggered arthritis. J. Leukocyte Biol. 79: 482-488. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Tassiulas, I., X. Hu, H. Ho, Y. Kashyap, P. Paik, Y. Hu, C. A. Lowell, L. B. Ivashkiv. 2004. Amplification of IFN-{alpha}-induced STAT1 activation and inflammatory function by Syk and ITAM-containing adaptors. Nat. Immunol. 5: 1181-1189. [Medline]
  37. Uematsu, S., S. Akira. 2006. The role of Toll-like receptors in immune disorders. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 6: 203-214. [Medline]
  38. Christensen, S. R., M. Kashgarian, L. Alexopoulou, R. A. Flavell, S. Akira, M. J. Shlomchik. 2005. Toll-like receptor 9 controls anti-DNA autoantibody production in murine lupus. J. Exp. Med. 202: 321-331. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Gitlin, L., W. Barchet, S. Gilfillan, M. Cella, B. Beutler, R. A. Flavell, M. S. Diamond, M. Colonna. 2006. Essential role of mda-5 in type I IFN responses to polyriboinosinic:polyribocytidylic acid and encephalomyocarditis picornavirus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 8459-8464. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Brandes, M. E., J. B. Allen, Y. Ogawa, S. M. Wahl. 1991. Transforming growth factor beta1 suppresses acute and chronic arthritis in experimental animals. J. Clin. Invest. 87: 1108-1113. [Medline]
  41. Allen, J. B., C. L. Manthey, A. R. Hand, K. Ohura, L. Ellingsworth, S. M. Wahl. 1990. Rapid onset synovial inflammation and hyperplasia induced by transforming growth factor beta. J. Exp. Med. 171: 231-247. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Triantaphyllopoulos, K. A., R. O. Williams, H. Tailor, Y. Chernajovsky. 1999. Amelioration of collagen-induced arthritis and suppression of interferon-{gamma}, interleukin-12, and tumor necrosis factor {alpha} production by interferon-beta gene therapy. Arthritis Rheum. 42: 90-99. [Medline]
  43. Genovese, M. C., E. F. Chakravarty, E. Krishnan, L. W. Moreland. 2004. A randomized, controlled trial of interferon-beta1a (Avonexs®) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a pilot study [ISRCTN03626626]. Arthritis Res. Ther. 6: R73-R77. [Medline]
  44. Shiozawa, S., K. Shiozawa, M. Kita, T. Kishida, T. Fujita, S. Imura. 1992. A preliminary study on the effect of {alpha}-interferon treatment on the joint inflammation and serum calcium in rheumatoid arthritis. Br. J. Rheumatol. 31: 405-408. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Smeets, T. J., J. M. Dayer, M. C. Kraan, J. Versendaal, R. Chicheportiche, F. C. Breedveld, P. P. Tak. 2000. The effects of interferon-beta treatment of synovial inflammation and expression of metalloproteinases in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 43: 270-274. [Medline]
  46. Sundel, R. P., C. A. Wallace, D. Zurakowski. 2001. Pilot trial of interferon beta-1a in JRA. Arthritis Rheum. 44: s272
  47. van Holten, J., K. Reedquist, P. Sattonet-Roche, T. J. Smeets, C. Plater-Zyberk, M. J. Vervoordeldonk, P. P. Tak. 2004. Treatment with recombinant interferon-beta reduces inflammation and slows cartilage destruction in the collagen-induced arthritis model of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 6: R239-R249. [Medline]
  48. Treschow, A. P., I. Teige, K. S. Nandakumar, R. Holmdahl, S. Issazadeh-Navikas. 2005. Stromal cells and osteoclasts are responsible for exacerbated collagen-induced arthritis in interferon-beta-deficient mice. Arthritis Rheum. 52: 3739-3748. [Medline]
  49. Firestein, G. S., N. J. Zvaifler. 2002. How important are T cells in chronic rheumatoid synovitis? II. T cell-independent mechanisms from beginning to end. Arthritis Rheum. 46: 298-308. [Medline]
  50. Solomon, S., N. Rajasekaran, E. Jeisy-Walder, S. B. Snapper, H. Illges. 2005. A crucial role for macrophages in the pathology of K/B x N serum-induced arthritis. Eur. J. Immunol. 35: 3064-3073. [Medline]
  51. Wirtz, S., M. F. Neurath. 2005. Illuminating the role of type I IFNs in colitis. J. Clin. Invest. 115: 586-588. [Medline]
  52. Bresnihan, B., D. Kane. 2004. Sonography and subclinical synovitis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 63: 333-334. [Free Full Text]
  53. Wakefield, R. J., M. J. Green, H. Marzo-Ortega, P. G. Conaghan, W. W. Gibbon, D. McGonagle, S. Proudman, P. Emery. 2004. Should oligoarthritis be reclassified? Ultrasound reveals a high prevalence of subclinical disease. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 63: 382-385. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Emery, P., F. C. Breedveld, M. Dougados, J. R. Kalden, M. H. Schiff, J. S. Smolen. 2002. Early referral recommendation for newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis: evidence based development of a clinical guide. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 61: 290-297. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Mimori, T.. 2005. Clinical significance of anti-CCP antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis. Intern. Med. 44: 1122-1126. [Medline]
  56. Edwards, C. J., C. Cooper. 2006. Early environmental factors and rheumatoid arthritis. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 143: 1-5. [Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Ann Rheum DisHome page
M Corr, D L Boyle, L Ronacher, N Flores, and G S Firestein
Synergistic benefit in inflammatory arthritis by targeting I{kappa}B kinase {epsilon} and interferon {beta}
Ann Rheum Dis, February 1, 2009; 68(2): 257 - 263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann Rheum DisHome page
Q Zhang, W Hui, G J Litherland, M J Barter, R Davidson, C Darrah, S T Donell, I M Clark, T E Cawston, J H Robinson, et al.
Differential Toll-like receptor-dependent collagenase expression in chondrocytes
Ann Rheum Dis, November 1, 2008; 67(11): 1633 - 1641.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yarilina, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ivashkiv, L. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yarilina, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ivashkiv, L. B.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS