|
|
||||||||
Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
4
7 and CCR9. Interestingly, the defect in trafficking of CD18/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells to the intestinal lamina propria persists even under conditions of equivalent activation and intestinal-tropic differentiation, implicating a role for CD18 in the trafficking of activated T cells into intestinal tissues independent of the earlier defects in the intestinal immune response. This argues for a complex role for CD18 in the early priming checkpoints and ultimately in the trafficking of T cells to the intestinal tissues during an intestinal immune response. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
4
7, and the chemokine receptor, CCR9, is critical for T cell trafficking from the secondary lymphoid structures into the intestinal tissues (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13). Previous studies have shown that
4
7 contributes to rolling and adhesion of lymph node cells within both PP and lamina propria high endothelial venules (14, 15).
In addition to
4
7, LFA-1 (
L
2 or CD11a/CD18) also plays a role in intestinal T cell trafficking. The requirement for multiple integrins in mediating intestinal T cell migration and function reflects the complexity of the intestinal immune response. For example, whereas trafficking to MLN does not require
4
7 (3, 5), LFA-1 is critical to MLN migration as well to PP migration (16, 17). In PP migration,
4
7 functions as a bridge to LFA-1-dependent adhesion (15). Furthermore, despite the contribution of
4
7 to trafficking and accumulation of T cells in specific intestinal lymphoid organs, it has been found not to play a role in T cell activation (18), whereas we hypothesize that LFA-1 plays a crucial role in intestinal T cell activation and differentiation in response to oral Ags. CD18-deficient mice have decreased numbers of T cells in intestinal tissues (19). Moreover, murine colitis is severely attenuated when LFA-1:ICAM interactions are blocked or absent before onset of disease (20, 21). This may, in part, reflect the demonstrated roles of LFA-1 in arrest on PP high endothelial venules (15), and trafficking to PP and MLN (16, 17). However, the intestinal immune checkpoints subsequent to PP and MLN entry that are affected by LFA-1:ICAM blockade are not known.
Thus, although LFA-1 is clearly important to intestinal immune function, its contributions to specific T cell functions in the intestine are not known. For example, functional absence of CD18 (e.g., CD18-deficient mice or blocking Abs) results in blockade of all
2 integrin family members on many different hemopoietic cell subsets (e.g., NK cells, dendritic cells (DC), macrophages, B cells) that may contribute to altered T cell accumulation in intestinal tissues. In addition, although studies have demonstrated that LFA-1 participates in T cell trafficking to PP and MLN (16, 17), they have not addressed whether LFA-1 on T cells is necessary for T cell activation and acquisition of intestinal tropism in response to intestinal Ags once T cells have entered these intestinal secondary lymphoid structures. Furthermore, it is not known whether LFA-1 on T cells is directly required for subsequent migration to the lamina propria where T cells may exert effector functions. In fact, the role for LFA-1 in entry into PP and MLN may fully account for any role LFA-1 may have in effective accumulation of T cells in intestinal tissues.
LFA-1 is known to play a critical role in trafficking of naive T cells to peripheral secondary lymphoid organs, and in peripheral T cell activation (16, 17, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30). However, the requirement for LFA-1 in T cell responses in the intestinal immune system is largely undefined. The modulatory role of LFA-1 may have distinct features in the intestinal immune system when compared with immune responses that take place in peripheral lymph nodes for several reasons. T cells in the intestinal MLN have a decreased requirement for LFA-1 for initial entry (17), are exposed to higher levels of bacterial Ags, have an overall more activated status in comparison with that of T cells in the peripheral lymph nodes, and are activated by APCs with features distinct from those in the peripheral lymph nodes. As such, the role of LFA-1 in T cell activation and differentiation with the unique DC of the PP and MLN has not been examined. Thus, the role of LFA-1 in immune checkpoints subsequent to PP and MLN entry has not been defined.
Understanding the role for LFA-1 in intestinal immune checkpoints is critical to understanding its contributions to uncontrolled T cell activation and entry into intestinal tissues in diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease. To determine the role of LFA-1 in T cell immune responses in the intestine, we dissected its contribution at specific checkpoints of the immune response in vivo through the adoptive transfer of CD18/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells into wild-type (WT) recipients. We found that in addition to the defect in trafficking to the MLN and PP that had been reported previously, CD18/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells that have successfully entered those sites have additional defects in proliferation in these lymphoid organs in response to oral Ag and in differentiation to T cells expressing intestinal trafficking molecules. Furthermore, we show that CD18 has a role independent of its effects on T cell activation and intestinal-tropic differentiation in contributing to the optimal trafficking of activated T cells into the intestinal lamina propria. Taken together, these findings highlight the complex and broad involvement of CD18 at multiple levels in intestinal T cell immune responses.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CD18/ mice were generously provided by Dr. A. Beaudet (Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX) (29). CD18/ mice were backcrossed onto the BALB/c background (nine generations) and then to DO11.10 TCR-transgenic mice. BALB/c mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory. BALB/c Thy1.1-congenic mice were generously provided by Dr. Alexander Khoruts (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN). T cells were phenotyped through staining of peripheral blood cells with a biotinylated mAb, KJ1-26 (Caltag Laboratories), directed against the TCR clonotype expressed by DO11.10 T cells and by anti-CD18 (BD Pharmingen). Mice were maintained on autoclaved food and irradiated water in a specific pathogen-free facility with filtered air according to National Institutes of Health guidelines.
Abs and staining reagents
The following Abs and secondary reagents used for flow cytometry were purchased from BD Pharmingen and/or eBioscience: PE-, FITC-, biotin-, APC-Cy7-, allophycocyanin-labeled anti-CD4; PE-, biotin-, and FITC-labeled anti-CD18, PE-labeled anti-
4
7; PE-Cy7 Thy1.2- and CyChrome-labeled streptavidin. The following Abs and secondary reagents were purchased from Caltag: PE-, PE-Cy5, and biotin-labeled KJ1-26. A goat polyclonal Ab raised to aa 1037 of murine CCR9 was purchased from Abcam, and PE- and APC-labeled anti-goat secondary reagent were purchased from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories.
Intestinal cell isolation
Lamina propria lymphocytes (LPL) were isolated essentially as described in Ref. 31 . In brief, PP were removed from the small bowel (SB). SBs and colons were cut longitudinally and then into
1-mm pieces. Colonic or small bowel pieces were washed thoroughly (ice-cold PBS, 5% FCS) and then digested (PBS, 5 mM EDTA, 5% FCS) at 37°C for 1 h in a rotating incubator to remove the epithelial cells. The supernatants containing epithelial cells and intraepithelial lymphocytes were discarded, and intestines were washed twice in ice-cold PBS to remove the residual EDTA. The remaining tissue was then incubated for 2 h at 37°C in a rotating incubator in collagenase buffer consisting of RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FCS, 200 U/ml collagenase VIII (Sigma-Aldrich), 2 mM glutamine, 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 10 mM HEPES, 50 µM 2-ME, essential amino acids, 0.5 µg/ml Fungizone, and 50 U/ml penicillin-50 µg/ml streptomycin. The cells were then filtered through a 40-µm pore size filter (Falcon) and washed twice in medium without collagenase.
In vivo T cell activation
Spleen-derived CD4+ T cells were isolated using CD4+ microbeads according to manufacturers instructions (Miltenyi Biotec). The efficacy of the CD4+ T cell purification was monitored by flow cytometry and was routinely >93% pure. Freshly isolated CD18+/ or CD18/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells were stained with 1.7 µM CFSE (Molecular Probes) and adoptively transferred by i.v. injection (2.5 x 106 of each per mouse) into WT BALB/c mice or WT Thy1.1 BALB/c mice. Twenty-four hours later, mice were immunized by oral gavage with 50 mg of chicken OVA (Sigma-Aldrich). Spleen, MLN, PP, and, where indicated, LPL, were harvested at the indicated days after immunization. Cells were stained with anti-CD4 and KJ1-26, along with Thy1.2 and/or CD18 where indicated, to assess activation (per CFSE dilution) and analyzed on a FACSCalibur or FACSCanto (BD Biosciences). In some experiments, the trafficking molecules
4
7 and CCR9 were also assessed.
In vitro T cell proliferation
For in vitro stimulation, 5.0 x 104 freshly isolated spleen-derived CD18+/ or CD18/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells were incubated with PP or MLN CD11c-isolated cells (microbeads from Miltenyi) from WT mice injected s.c. with Flt3L-secreting melanoma tumors (generously provided by Dr. Ulrich von Andrian, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA) (9, 11). T cell activation was conducted at the indicated DC:T cell ratios and with various concentrations of chicken OVA323339 in a 96-well round-bottom plate. [3H]Thymidine was added to the cultures during the last 18 h of a 72-h assay.
In vitro T cell cultures
Freshly isolated spleen-derived CD18+/ or CD18/ CD4+ T cells were stimulated with plate-bound anti-CD3 (4 µg/ml) and anti-CD28 (4 µg/ml) in the presence of 10 nM retinoic acid (Sigma-Aldrich). In other experiments, freshly isolated spleen-derived CD18+/ or CD18/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells were stimulated in the presence of 2 µg/ml OVA peptide at a 1:1 ratio (unless indicated otherwise) with PP or MLN-derived CD11c+ DC (Miltenyi) from WT mice injected s.c. with Flt3L-secreting melanoma cells. Cells were maintained in DMEM (Invitrogen Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% FCS, 2 mM glutamine, 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids, 20 mM HEPES, 100 U/ml penicillin-100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 50 µM 2-ME. Under both culture conditions, 10 U/ml recombinant human IL-2 was supplemented on day 3 after stimulation.
T cell homing
In vitro generated CD4+ T cells were harvested by Ficoll purification 56 days after stimulation. Freshly isolated or in vitro generated CD18+/ and CD18/ CD4+ T cells were differentially stained with either 1.5 µM CFSE or 2.5 µM Cell Tracker Orange (CTO) (Molecular Probes). CD18+/ and CD18/ CD4+ T cells were adoptively cotransferred at a 1:1 ratio (1520 x 106 T cells each per mouse). Sixteen hours after transfer, PP, MLN, spleen, and, where indicated, LPL were harvested. Cells were stained for CD4+, and the homing index was calculated as transferred WT CD18+/ CD4+ T cells/CD18/ CD4+ T cells adjusted for the initial input ratio.
Statistical analyses
Statistical comparisons of homing index between treated groups were assessed using a t test comparing experimental homing index vs homing index = 1. Cell accumulation between treated groups was assessed using a one-tailed Student t test. p < 0.05 was considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To dissect the role of CD18 in CD4+ T cell immune responses within the intestinal lymphoid system, we first sought to determine whether there was a defect in the number of Ag-responsive CD4+ T cells in the intestinal lamina propria after activation through oral Ag. CD18 is expressed on hematopoietic cells (22), such that CD18/ mice have a deficiency of CD18 on non-T cell subsets that may contribute to abnormal intestinal lymphoid organ immune responses. Therefore, we sought to investigate the role of CD18 specifically on CD4+ T cells through the adoptive transfer of TCR-transgenic CD4+ T cells. We used the adoptive transfer of CD18/ mice x DO11.10 T cells (encode an OVA-specific, IAd-restricted TCR) into WT mice, such that only the Ag-specific T cells migrating and responding to immunization are CD18 deficient. We isolated CD4+ T cells from the spleen, given that the majority of T cells in the spleen have not differentiated into tissue-specific T cells and CD4+ T cells in CD18/ mice do not have a trafficking defect to the spleen (17). These CD18/ CD4+ T cells are deficient only in LFA-1, given that it is the only
2 integrin expressed on peripheral CD4+ T cells (data not shown). CD18+/ mice are used as littermate controls for CD18/ mice because both CD18+/+ and CD18+/ mice have identical cell surface expression of CD18 by flow cytometry. CD18+/ and CD18/ CD4+ D011.10 T cells were adoptively cotransferred into WT Thy1.1 BALB/c mice; 24 h later, the mice were immunized with oral OVA. Absolute numbers of migrated CD4+ DO11.10 T cells to the intestinal lamina were determined 5 days after immunization to allow adequate time for trafficking to effector tissues. The number of CD18/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells in intestinal secondary lymphoid organs, MLN and PP, as well as in the small and large intestinal lamina propria, is decreased compared with CD18+/ CD4+ T cells (Fig. 1). Similar findings are observed at an earlier time point, day 4, after immunization (data not shown). Therefore, there is a defect in the total number of accumulated CD18/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells in the intestinal lamina propria after an oral immune response.
|
The defect in accumulation of CD18/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells in the intestinal lamina propria may be due to defects at various checkpoints in the immune response. The first step in the intestinal immune response requires the proper trafficking of Ag-specific T cells to the intestinal secondary lymphoid organs, including the MLN and PP. LFA-1 has been previously shown to play a role in trafficking to MLN and PP (16, 17). To confirm this role in cotransfer homing experiments using DO11.10 T cells, we determined the absolute numbers of migrated CD4+ DO11.10 T cells to the MLN and PP 16 h after adoptive cotransfer into WT BALB/c mice. The 16-h time point allows for distribution of T cells to the lymphoid organs. Migration of CD18/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells to both the MLN and PP is decreased compared with CD18+/ CD4+ T cells (Fig. 2). As controls, we also assessed trafficking to peripheral secondary lymphoid organs. As expected, trafficking of CD18/ CD4+ T cells is decreased to the PLN, whereas it is increased to the spleen, compared with CD18+/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells (Fig. 2) (17). The increased trafficking to the spleen is consistent with the splenic hypercellularity of CD4+ T cells in CD18-deficient mice under homeostatic conditions (16) and likely secondary to a redistribution of the CD4+ T cell population due to the inability to properly traffic to lymph nodes.
|
In the context of the migration defect of CD18/ CD4+ T cells to intestinal secondary lymphoid organs, we examined the activation of those CD4+ DO11.10 T cells that had successfully trafficked to the MLN of WT mice on exposure to oral Ag. Cell divisions, as indicated by CFSE dilution, 3 days after oral immunization were used as a measure of T cell activation. Upon cotransfer with CD18+/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells into WT BALB/c mice, CD18/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells in MLN entered into cell division, but 2550% less CD18/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells in MLN were able to progress to later cell divisions as compared with CD18+/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells (Fig. 3A, cotransfer). The defect in CD18/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cell activation in the MLN persisted at day 6 after immunization, indicating that the defect is not simply a delayed kinetic response (data not shown). We use cotransfer of CD18+/ and CD18/ DO11.10 T cells as a means of more accurately comparing the responses of these T cells within the mice. However, it is possible that in the absence of competition from CD18+/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells during T cell priming, the observed severe CD18/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cell activation defect may significantly improve. Therefore, we adoptively transferred CD18+/ and CD18/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells into separate WT BALB/c mice and assessed priming in the MLN after oral OVA immunization. The activation defect in CD18/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells in MLN persisted despite lack of competition from CD18+/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells (Fig. 3A, separate transfer). As expected, the total number of accumulated CD18/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells in the MLN after oral immunization under both cotransfer and separate transfer conditions was also decreased relative to CD18+/ controls (Fig. 3B). Therefore, CD18/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells demonstrate a persistent defect in both migration to the MLN and proliferation in the MLN in vivo upon oral immunization.
|
In light of the defect in proliferation observed in CD18/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells in MLN on administration of oral Ag, we questioned whether CD18/ T cells are defective in T cell differentiation on activation with oral Ag. Specifically, we assessed whether CD18-deficient CD4+ T cells were defective in the up-regulation of the intestinal-specific trafficking molecules,
4
7 and CCR9. The expression of these intestinal trafficking molecules is essential for proper trafficking of T cells to the intestinal tissues where they can then participate in the effector immune response. WT mice were adoptively cotransferred with CFSE-labeled CD18+/ and CD18/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells and orally immunized 24 h later with OVA. From 3 to 4 days after immunization, CD18/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells in both the MLN and PP demonstrate a defect in the percentage of T cells up-regulating
4
7 and CCR9 (Fig. 4A). A defect in proliferation of CD18/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells is now observed in the PP as well as the MLN (Fig. 4A). The ability to up-regulate
4
7 and CCR9 is acquired in the intestinal secondary lymphoid organs as T cells progress through cell division, such that it is possible that the differentiation defect observed in CD18/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells during oral OVA immunization is due to the defect in cell proliferation in the MLN and PP, and/or that there is an additional independent role for CD18 in differentiation of T cells expressing intestinal trafficking molecules. To examine these possibilities, we quantitated the level of
4
7 and CCR9 expression on CD18/ T cells at each cell division. We find that surface levels of these intestinal-specific trafficking molecules are equivalent between CD18+/ and CD18/ T cells at a given cell cycle (Fig. 4B). Therefore, CD18/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells demonstrate a defect in the acquisition of intestinal trafficking molecules during oral immunization associated with their proliferation defect.
|
One possibility for the defect in activation and differentiation of CD18/ CD4+ DO11.10 T cells upon oral OVA immunization is that the CD18/ T cell trafficking defect to the MLN and PP at the onset of the immune response may result in an insufficient critical T cell mass to allow for appropriate proliferation and differentiation. As a result, the defect in CD18/ T cell proliferation and acquisition of intestinal tropism would be due to the initial migration effect rather than a direct defect in CD18/ T cell activation and differentiation upon interaction with DC. In light of the critical role of DC from MLN and PP in T cell activation and differentiation, we first assessed whether the defect in CD18/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cell proliferation was due to a defect in activation by DC from these secondary lymphoid organs. We used isolated WT MLN DC and PP DC to activate CD18+/ or CD18/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells in vitro. CD18/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells demonstrate an activation defect over a broad range of Ag doses at physiological DC:T cell ratios of 1:20 with both MLN DC (Fig. 5A) and PP DC (Fig. 5B). This activation defect persists even when the ratio of DC:T cells increases to 1:10, and finally 1:1, a much higher ratio than is observed in vivo in lymphoid structures. Therefore, CD18/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells have a defect in activation in vitro upon stimulation with either MLN or PP DC.
|
4
7 and CCR9 (9, 10, 11, 12, 13). We found that upon activation with either MLN or PP DC, a decreased percent of CD18/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells up-regulate
4
7 and CCR9 (Fig. 6). Of those CD18/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells successfully up-regulating
4
7 and CCR9, they did not increase expression to the same degree as did CD18+/ T cells (Fig. 6). Therefore, despite highly favorable activation conditions, CD18/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells have defects in differentiation into T cells expressing intestinal trafficking molecules upon stimulation with either MLN or PP DC.
|
T cells activated by either MLN or PP DC demonstrate enhanced trafficking to the intestine in comparison to T cells activated by peripheral-derived DC (9, 10, 11, 12, 13). The decreased number of CD18/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells in the intestinal lamina propria after oral Ag may be due to the decreased number T cells in the MLN and PP available for trafficking to the intestine after the immune response, due to 1) initial migration defects and 2) expansion defects, as well as 3) defects in differentiation into intestinal homing cells and 4) an independent role for CD18 in the final phase of entry into the lamina propria. We now know that CD18/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells are defective in migration, proliferation, and differentiation into intestinal trafficking cells in vivo. We next sought to determine whether CD18/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells activated by either MLN or PP DC have defects in trafficking to the intestine. To eliminate the defects in available numbers of CD18/ T cells in the secondary lymphoid structures that are observed in vivo, we transferred equal numbers of CD18/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells activated in vitro by either MLN or PP DC according to the conditions described in Fig. 6. On cotransfer of CD18+/ and CD18/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells, CD18/ T cells activated by either PP (Fig. 7, A and B) or MLN (Fig. 7C) DC have defects in homing to secondary intestinal lymphoid organs and intestinal tissues, including MLN, PP, and large and SB lamina propria. The defect in intestinal-specific trafficking is more severe in CD18/ T cells activated by PP DC. As an internal control, activated CD18/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells home well to the spleen, a secondary lymphoid organ which is not dependent upon CD18 for optimal trafficking (Fig. 7). Therefore, despite transfer of equal numbers of MLN or PP DC-instructed CD18/ T cells, CD18/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells demonstrate defects in homing to the intestinal lymphoid system.
|
The defect in intestinal trafficking exhibited by MLN or PP DC-instructed CD18/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells may be due to the decreased expression of intestinal-specific trafficking molecules on these T cells. Alternatively, CD18 may directly contribute to trafficking of activated CD4+ T cells into the intestine, independent of its role in the up-regulation of intestinal trafficking molecules during T cell activation. To investigate this latter possibility, we examined whether enforced expression of intestinal trafficking molecules on activated CD18/ CD4+ T cells could overcome their defect in migration to intestinal tissues. Therefore, we activated CD18+/ and CD18/ CD4+ T cells with plate-bound anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 in the presence of retinoic acid, which instructs T cells to up-regulate intestinal trafficking molecules and results in significantly improved homing to the intestine (32). We find that CD18/ T cells activated under these conditions proliferate equivalently to CD18+/ T cells (Fig. 8, A and B), similar to previous reports using anti-CD3 stimulation (33). We further find that CD18/ CD4+ T cells up-regulate
4
7 and CCR9 to an equivalent level as is observed on CD18+/ T cells (Fig. 8C). Despite equivalent activation and intestinal-tropic differentiation of CD18/ CD4+ T cells in vitro, these T cells continue to demonstrate a defect in homing to intestinal tissues (Fig. 8, D and E). Therefore, CD18 can contribute to optimal intestinal trafficking independent of its contributions to T cell proliferation and differentiation in the secondary lymphoid structures of the intestine.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
4
7 and CCR9. Finally, CD18 plays a role in the trafficking of intestinal-tropic CD4+ T cells to the lamina propria independent of its role in activation and intestinal-tropic differentiation. We have taken advantage of the ability to follow Ag-responsive CD4+ T cells to dissect the contribution of CD18 at each phase of the intestinal immune response. The defect in accumulation of Ag-specific CD18/ CD4+ T cells in the intestinal lamina propria after oral Ag administration reflects a compounding of multiple defects in the immune response. Although we had previously identified a role for CD18 in T cell priming in vivo in the peripheral secondary lymphoid organs, the intestinal secondary lymphoid organs have different dependencies on trafficking molecules, have distinct DC-mediating T cell activation, have a larger percentage of activated T cells, and are continually exposed to intestinal bacterial Ags, such that the requirements for optimal T cell activation in these lymphoid structures may well have different requirements. Nevertheless, we find that optimal T cell activation in both the MLN and PP requires CD18. Considerations of mechanisms accounting for the CD18/CD4+ T cell activation defect may include both CD18s adhesive and costimulatory functions (16, 17, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30).
Associated with the defect in CD18/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cell progression through cell cycle in the MLN and PP upon oral Ag administration is a defect in the up-regulation of intestinal trafficking molecules generally acquired upon cell cycle progression in the MLN and PP. CD18 does not appear to have an independent contribution to up-regulation of
4
7 and CCR9 beyond its role in optimizing T cell proliferation. When we examine CD18/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells for the up-regulation of
4
7 and CCR9 on activation with MLN and PP DC in vitro, we see a defect in up-regulation despite highly favorable conditions for T cell activation at high 1:1 ratio DC:T cells and moderately high Ag dose. The defect in trafficking to the intestinal lymphoid system of MLN and PP DC-instructed CD18/ T cells would likely be greater if the T cells were activated in vitro under lower DC:T cell ratios that are more consistent with those observed in vivo. The defect that is observed in the trafficking of MLN and PP DC-instructed CD18/ DO11.10 CD4+ T cells to intestinal tissues likely reflects a combination of defects in up-regulation of intestinal-specific trafficking molecules, the deficiency of CD18, as well as possible defects in up-regulation of other adhesion molecules that may contribute to intestinal tissue trafficking. The identification of an independent role for CD18 in the trafficking of fully activated intestinal-tropic CD4+ T cells indicates that although intestinal-specific trafficking molecules are important for trafficking to intestinal tissues, they are insufficient for optimal trafficking in the absence of CD18. This is of particular relevance to diseases involving an existent population of activated, pathogenic CD4+ T cells that have been instructed to traffic to the intestine.
The infiltration of effector T cells into specific tissues is a critical feature of inflammatory disease. As a result, targeting both effector T cell activation and trafficking is increasingly used in the treatment of inflammatory diseases, such as inflammatory bowel disease, psoriasis, and multiple sclerosis. However, the outcomes of these interventions have been mixed. For example, one large study of blockade of
4 (thereby blocking
4
7 and
4
1) in patients with Crohns disease was of benefit in the maintenance phase of disease, although not in induction of remission in early phases of disease when there is significant ongoing T cell activation and populations of inflammatory effector T cells (35). This highlights the necessity of understanding the timing and role of various trafficking molecules in contributing to an immune process. The interaction of LFA-1 with its ligands (e.g., ICAM-1, ICAM-2, ICAM-3, and juntional adhesion molecule family members; Ref. 22) has been targeted in therapy of inflammatory diseases in both animal models and human disease, including inflammatory bowel disease (20, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44). As such, although LFA-1 has a role in trafficking to a number of lymphoid and nonlymphoid organs, in some models of intestinal inflammation, blockade of LFA-1 is, in fact, more effective than blockade of the more intestinal-specific integrins
4 and/or
7 (45). This may be due to contributions to intestinal immune responses by LFA-1 that are not observed with
4
7, such as trafficking to MLN or T cell activation, or to the need to block multiple molecules simultaneously due to redundancy in certain functions, such as trafficking. Therefore, although LFA-1 contributes to peripheral T cell functions, it also contributes to essential intestinal immune functions. Future interventions will require selecting appropriate technologies to mediate inhibition, optimizing the timing for intervention, determining the cooperation with other molecules in mediating intestinal immune responses, as well as carefully selecting the specific surface receptor/ligand to be targeted. As we have identified that CD18 can contribute to optimal DO11.10 CD4+ T cell responses at each phase of the intestinal immune response (migration, activation, and differentiation into intestinal-tropic T cells in the MLN and PP and trafficking into intestinal lamina propria), it has the potential to be an effective target at multiple time points in an intestinal inflammatory process.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Disclosures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 This work was supported by the Crohns and Colitis Foundation of America, National Institutes of Health Grant DK02905 (to C.A.), and University of Chicago Digestive Disease Center Grant DK42086. ![]()
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Clara Abraham, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, MC 6084, Chicago, IL 60637. E-mail address: cabraham{at}medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: MLN, mesenteric lymph nodes; WT, wild type; DO11.10 mice, OVA-specific TCR-transgenic mice; PP, Peyers patches; PLN, peripheral lymph nodes; LPL, lamina propria lymphocytes; DC, dendritic cells; CTO, cell tracker orange; LB, large bowel; SB, small bowel. ![]()
Received for publication August 30, 2006. Accepted for publication November 30, 2006.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
7 integrins on human mucosal lymphocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89: 1924-1928.
4-integrins in lymphocyte homing to mucosal tissues in vivo. J. Immunol. 152: 3282-3293. [Abstract]
7 integrins in formation of the gut-associated lymphoid tissue. Nature 382: 366-370. [Medline]
7 integrin. J. Immunol. 161: 6638-6647.
7 integrins in CD8 T cell trafficking during an antiviral immune response. J. Exp. Med. 189: 1631-1638. 
7+ lymphocytes to the small-intestinal mucosa. J. Clin. Invest. 110: 1113-1121. [Medline]
4 integrins mediate lymphocyte attachment and rolling under physiologic flow. Cell 80: 413-422. [Medline]
4
7 and LFA-1 in lymphocyte homing to Peyers patch-HEV in situ: the multistep model confirmed and refined. Immunity 3: 99-108. [Medline]
7 integrin results in less graft-versus-host disease because of decreased homing of alloreactive T cells to intestine. Blood 107: 1703-1711.
2 integrins and ICAM-1 are involved in establishment of the intestinal mucosal T cell compartment. Immunity 5: 263-273. [Medline]
2 integrins are required for skin homing of primed T cells but not for priming naive T cells. J. Clin. Invest. 109: 183-192. [Medline]
2 integrins and ICAM-1 are involved in establishment of the intestinal mucosal T cell compartment. Immunity 5: 263-273. [Medline]
2 integrins. Lab. Invest. 86: 380-390.
L
2 but not of integrins
4 and/or
7 significantly prolongs intestinal allograft survival in mice. Gut 47: 97-104. This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Liang, C. Liu, J. Y. Djeu, B. Zhong, T. Peters, K. Scharffetter-Kochanek, C. Anasetti, and X.-Z. Yu 2 integrins separate graft-versus-host disease and graft-versus-leukemia effects Blood, January 15, 2008; 111(2): 954 - 962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||